Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 316.272 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 316.272 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 316.272 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 316.272

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXIII
MOTOR VEHICLES
Chapter 316
STATE UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL
View Entire Chapter
316.272 Exhaust systems, prevention of noise.
(1) Every motor vehicle shall at all times be equipped with an exhaust system in good working order and in constant operation, including muffler, manifold pipe, and tailpiping to prevent excessive or unusual noise. In no event shall an exhaust system allow noise at a level which exceeds a maximum decibel level to be established by regulation of the Department of Environmental Protection as provided in s. 403.061(11) in cooperation with the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. No person shall use a muffler cutout, bypass or similar device upon a vehicle on a highway.
(2) The engine and power mechanism of every motor vehicle shall be so equipped and adjusted as to prevent the escape of excessive fumes or smoke.
(3) A violation of this section is a noncriminal traffic infraction, punishable as a nonmoving violation as provided in chapter 318.
History.s. 1, ch. 71-135; s. 1, ch. 72-39; s. 1, ch. 73-89; s. 27, ch. 79-65; s. 135, ch. 94-356; s. 204, ch. 99-248; s. 30, ch. 2006-1.

F.S. 316.272 on Google Scholar

F.S. 316.272 on CourtListener

Amendments to 316.272


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Civil Citations / Citable Offenses under S316.272
R or S next to points is Mandatory Revocation or Suspension

S316.272 NOISE - MUFFLER - No/Improper (cutouts, bypass, etc.) - Points on Drivers License: 0
S316.272 (1) NOISE - Loud defective muffler - Points on Drivers License: 0
S316.272 (2) NOISE - Emit excess exhaust fumes - Points on Drivers License: 0

Cases Citing Statute 316.272

Total Results: 3  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

State v. Cobbs, 411 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...That prohibition, read in conjunction with the counterpart requirement that "every motor vehicle ... be equipped with an exhaust system in good working order and in constant operation, including muffler, manifold pipe, and tailpiping to prevent excessive or unusual noise," Section 316.272(1), Florida Statutes (1979), compels the conclusion that this equipment requirement applies to motorcycles....
...Therefore, contrary to the trial court's opinion, it was not "impossible" for an officer to entertain a reasonable suspicion that a violation of this statute was being committed in his presence. The second conclusion of the trial court was that even if, arguendo, Section 316.272(1) were applicable to motorcycles, the officer, admittedly not equipped with any sound level measuring equipment, could not by his own sense of hearing determine whether the noise of the defendant's motorcycle was in excess of the sta...
...didn't expound on that because there is no way we could have clocked him and I requested to see his driver's license." Thus, having heard what he believed to be excessive noise, the officer had a founded and articulable suspicion that a violation of Section 316.272(1) was occurring, justifying a stop to examine the exhaust system of the motorcycle....
...e appeared to be extremely faded and covered with glue, that dispute is a credibility issue to be resolved by the trial court). Lastly, the trial court's finding that because the defendant was not ultimately arrested or prosecuted for a violation of Section 316.272(1), the stop for an investigation of that offense was, ipso facto, pretextual, [4] is without basis in the law....
Copy

State v. Gibson, 560 So. 2d 1370 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 59192

...The trial court expressly did not address the issue of the validity of the defendants' consent to search the vehicle, so that issue remains for determination by the trial court after remand. REVERSED and REMANDED. GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] See § 316.272(1), Fla....
Copy

Classy Cycles, Inc. v. Bay Cnty., 201 So. 3d 779 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14507

brakes), § 316.271 (horns and warning devices), § 316.272 (exhaust system), § 316.293 (noise), § 316.2935

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. Attorney Syfert regularly works with Chapter 316 in the context of traffic and automobile accident law and represents clients throughout Northeast Florida. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.