Cases from cite.case.law:

. . . . §§256.05-256.051, 876.52 (1987); Ga. Code Ann. §50-3-9 (1986); Haw. Rev. . . .

. . . Wolfenberger was arrested on December 4, 1970, and charged with violating Section 256.05(2), 12 F.S.A . . . adds the following definitions: The words flag, standard, color, ensign or shield, as used in Sections 256.05 . . . “At the trial the defendant’s contention that Section 256.05(2) was unconstitutional as violative of . . . “Thus the broad range of Section 256.05 (2) would proscribe the respectful and customary use of emblems . . . “Finally, Section 256.05(2) is unconstitutional as applied to the particular flag alteration engaged . . .

. . . Wolfenberger was arrested on December 4, 1970, and charged with violating §256.05(2), and chapter 38, . . . is recognized by the laws of the state as a misdemeanor, as set out in the Florida Statutes . . . §256.05 . . . At the trial the defendant’s contention that §256.05(2) was unconstitutional as violative of the first . . . Defendant argues on appeal that §256.05(2) is unconstitutional on its face because it is overbroad and . . . Cahn, 437 F. 2d 344, 348 (2d Cir. 1970), a case on all fours holding New York’s equivalent of §256.05 . . .

. . . The controverted merchandise was classified by the collector of customs as “Wall paper” in item 256.05 . . . Paper and Paperboard Cut to Size or Shape; Articles of Paper and Paperboard $ $ $ $ 3* $ ‡ 256.05 Wall . . . Item 256.05 of the tariff schedules provides for wallpaper without qualification. . . . No rate change is involved.” $$$$$$$ “Item 256.05 covers wall paper presently dutiable at 0.5 cent per . . . It is consequently properly classifiable as “Wall paper” under item 256.05 of the Tariff Schedules of . . .

. . . Judgment is awarded to plaintiff in the sum of $256.05." It is so ordered. . . .

. . . The allowance of $256.05 for “ Eoosevelt Ave. assessment, 4th Instal.” is not shown to be one of the . . .