Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 251.01 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 251.01 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 251.01

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

The statute you have selected cannot be found.
Copyright © 1995-2024 The Florida Legislature • Privacy StatementContact Us


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 251.01
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 251.01.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

GAMERO, v. KOODO SUSHI CORP. d b a, 272 F. Supp. 3d 481 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . Damages: Before April 9, 2011, Defendants underpaid Mastranzo by $1,004.04, which means he can recover $251.01 . . .

In ABBATIELLO, v., 484 B.R. 655 (Bankr. M.D. Pa. 2013)

. . . Subtracting the total of Schedule J from Schedule I leaves a remainder of $251.01, i.e. net monthly income . . .

In DOHERTY. In A., 400 B.R. 382 (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . #7 (“Benedetti Claim # 7”), in the amount of ten thousand two hundred fifty one dollars 01/00 ($10,-251.01 . . .

ILLUSIONS- DALLAS PRIVATE CLUB, INC. a a a v. T. STEEN, Jr. a a P. T. s, v. T. Jr. a, 482 F.3d 299 (5th Cir. 2007)

. . . Bev.Code § 251.01. The Clubs are located in political subdivisions that have elected to be dry. . . . Bev.Code § 251.01. . . .

In SWANSON, 207 B.R. 76 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1997)

. . . the debtors' alleged contempt, excluding attorneys' fees and costs, total $10,506.37 and include: $251.01 . . .

BOARD OF TRADE OF CITY OF CHICAGO, v. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION,, 818 F. Supp. 228 (N.D. Ill. 1993)

. . . The only CBOT rule that potentially deals with CBOT’s jurisdiction over past members is Rule 251.01, . . . At the time Sanders sold his membership Rule 251.01 provided in relevant part: No member may sell his . . . CBOT Rule 251.01 (October 1, 1987). . . . Since none of the conditions described in Rule 251.01 were applicable to Sanders at the time he sold . . . Since these conditions were not applicable to Sanders, Rule 251.01 was not triggered. . . .

R. BUTZ, v. BANCOHIO NATIONAL BANK, In MANNS,, 31 B.R. 893 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1983)

. . . Debtor’s ready reserve account was as follows: DATE CHARGES * CREDITS * READY RESERVE IN USE 8-8-82 (251.01 . . .