The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . More specifically, he noted that NYPL section 220.31 prohibits the sale of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin . . . Matching NYPL section 220.31 with the CSA There is no longer any question that NYPL section 220.31 is . . . NYPL section 220.31 thus requires only that a defendant possess a "controlled substance" generally. . . . Therefore, our inquiry is limited to whether a "controlled substance" under NYPL section 220.31 is a . . . Sessions , 860 F.3d 58, 61 (2d Cir. 2017), however, found NYPL section 220.31 to be indivisible. . . .
. . . criminalized by New York but not by the federal government, a conviction under New York Penal Law § 220.31 . . .
. . . Penal Law §§ 110 and 220.31; and (2) applying the criminal-livelihood enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l . . . Penal Law § 220.31, and his second predicate offense as an attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance . . . Penal Law § 220.31 is not a “controlled substance offense” under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, is foreclosed by this . . . Penal Law § 220.31 qualifies as a predicate for the career-offender enhancement. . . . Penal Law § 220.39 (at issue in Bryant) and that of § 220.31 (at issue here) are identical, with the . . .
. . . We hold that NYPL § 220.31 defines a single crime and is therefore an “indivisible” statute. . . . Divisibility of NYPL § 220.31 To determine whether a NYPL § 220.31 conviction is an aggravated felony . . . , we must first ask whether NYPL § 220.31 is a divisible or an indivisible statute. . . . As discussed below, New York law supports our conclusion that § 220.31 is indivisible. 2. . . . The IJ did not bar Withholding or CAT relief on the basis of Harbin’s § 220.31 conviction. . . .
. . . Sanchez argued that New York Penal Law § 220.31, criminalizes conduct, including “mere offers” to sell . . .
. . . sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (cocaine) in violation of N.Y, Penal Law (NYPL) § 220.31 . . . In 2011, he was convicted of the criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, NYPL § 220.31 . . .
. . . Barrow’s more recent conviction is for a violation of New York Penal Law § 220.31. . . . Penal Law § 220.31 (West). . . . criminalized by New York but not by the federal government, a conviction under New York Penal Law § 220.31 . . . New York Penal Law § 220.31 does not list elements in the alternative; it is violated when a person “ . . . New York Penal Law § 220.31 (West). . . .
. . . . § 220.31. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 220.31, a felony under New York law. . . .
. . . under Pascual, Andrews’s conviction for fifth-degree criminal sale of cocaine, in violation of NYPL § 220.31 . . .
. . . attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree in violation of New York Penal Law § 220.31 . . . Hernandez argues that New York Penal Law § 220.31 cannot be treated categorically as a drug trafficking . . .
. . . Penal Law § 220.31, was an aggravated felony, because although the produced indictment listed eight counts . . .
. . . Court, Queens County of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, in violation of § 220.31 . . . the third degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, in violation of §§ 220.31 . . .
. . . Possession of a Controlled Substance in the Fifth Degree, a class D felony, in violation of Penal Law § 220.31 . . . application in New York State Supreme Court, New York County, to have his conviction under Penal Law § 220.31 . . .
. . . Penal Law §§ 110 & 220.31, and in 1999, of Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance in the Seventh . . .
. . . of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance (cocaine), in violation of New York Penal Law § 220.31 . . . on an additional allegation referencing De Vargas Nuñez’s 2003 conviction under New York Penal Law § 220.31 . . .
. . . Penal Law § 220.31, which proscribes the specifically intended drug object of Mizrahi’s solicitation. . . . Penal Law § 100.05(1) and § 220.31. . . . Penal Law § 220.31. See generally Dickson v. . . . Penal Law § 100.05(1) and § 220.31 and, as such, constitutes “a violation of ... any law ... relating . . . Penal Law § 220.31, which proscribes Mizrahi’s specifically intended object, the sale of drugs. . . .
. . . 2001, of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, in violation of § 220.31 . . .
. . . pleaded guilty in New York state court to a felony charge of sale of cocaine in violation of section 220.31 . . .
. . . Penal Law § 220.31, constitutes an aggravated felony. . . . Penal Law § 220.31. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 220.31, and sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 18 months to 3 years. . . .
. . . Penal Law §§ 220.31, 220.34, 220.39, 220.41, 220.43 (defining 5 different degrees of “criminal sale of . . .
. . . See § 220.31(1), Fla. Stat. (1997) (emphasis added). . . . circumstances like those presented in the subject case, would render meaningless that portion of section 220.31 . . . Sections 220.809 and 220.31(1), Florida Statutes, specifically cover the question at issue in this case . . .
. . . Penal Law § 220.31. Galvez-Falconi did not obtain permission to reenter the United States lawfully. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 220.31 (McKinney 1989). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 220.31. He pleaded guilty and began serving a two- to four-year term of imprisonment. . . . Penal Law § 220.31 (McKinney 1989) provides that “[a] person is guilty of criminal sale of a controlled . . .
. . . Com/pare New York Penal Law §§ 220.03 — 220.21 (possession offenses) with New York Penal Law §§ 220.31 . . .
. . . Penal Law § 220.31 (McKinney 1989). . . .
. . . 1982 under charges of Criminal Sale of a Controlled Substance in the Fifth Degree, N.Y.Penal Law § 220.31 . . .
. . . Joe points out Section 220.31, which provides that every taxpayer required to file “a return under this . . . Section 220.31. St. . . .
. . . Royalties totaling $220.31 received from Oil Purchasing in June and September 1983 were falsely reported . . .
. . . probable cause to believe, at a minimum, that Lilia would be committing a violation of N.Y.Penal Law § 220.31 . . . probable cause to believe that Michael Lilia was conspiring with others to violate N.Y.Penal Law § 220.31 . . . probable cause to believe that these persons would also be committing a violation of N.Y.Penal Law § 220.31 . . .
. . . In their separate returns for 1951, each did report dividends of $1,137.61, and interest of $220.31. . . .