The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 210.50(b)(2). . . .
. . . granted total compensation in the amount of $3,000 and reimbursement of expenses in the amount of $210.50 . . . The Court shall also allow Counsel to be reimbursed by the Debtor for expenses in the amount of $210.50 . . . for his representation of the Debtor in her Chapter 13 bankruptcy case and expenses in the amount of $210.50 . . . Roseann Ruggerio (“Debtor”); and (3) Counsel is allowed reimbursement of expenses in the amount of $210.50 . . .
. . . . § 210.50(a)(2). . . . Commission, see, e.g., id. § 210.23 (permitting sua sponte suspension of investigation by ITC); id. § 210.50 . . . production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, and U.S. consumers.” 19 C.F.R. § 210.50 . . . production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, and U.S. consumers. 19 C.F.R. § 210.50 . . . See 19 U.S.C. § 13370(3); see also 19 C.F.R. § 210.50(d). . . .
. . . Fees Unrelated to Subpoenas The Court will not include the $210.50 in fees reflected in the following . . .
. . . Penal Law §§ 210.50, 210.15 and People v. . . .
. . . Neidig $290.00 per month in insurance premiums, but paid the insurance company only $210.50 per month . . .
. . . Neidig $290.00 per month for the insurance, but paid the insurance company only $210.50 per month for . . .
. . . See CPL § 210.50. . People v. . . .
. . . The Debtor shall receive a refund of $210.50. CIT paid the firm $375 for 3.4 hours of G. . . .
. . . For example, Damon & Morey expended $210.50 to make for each creditor a copy of the nineteen page notice . . .
. . . Morgan, for $1,950 together with taxable cost in the amount of $210.50, or a total of $2,160.50 bearing . . .
. . . Sinkler’s South Carolina policy, for example, cost $210.50 for six months. . . .
. . . dollars and eight cents ($8,164.08) and costs in the amount of two hundred ten dollars and fifty cents ($210.50 . . . The hours (78.20 hours), the hourly fee rate ($104.40), and the costs ($210.50) are reasonable. . . . fees, under the Equal Access to Justice Act, in the amount of $8,164.08 and expenses in the amount of $210.50 . . .
. . . . § 210.50(a). . . . . § 210.50(c). . . . determination [constitutes] an initial determination of the administrative law judge...." 19 C.F.R. § 210.50 . . .
. . . standard of $213 per month, while a two person filing unit has a need standard of $421 per month, or $210.50 . . .
. . . Based on that section, the deputy found that claimant’s average weekly wage was $210.50. . . .
. . . Sand 6.75 $100 $ 675.00 $ 1,012.50 $ 23,064.00 Gill 0 0 0 0 $ 1,312.50 Rosen 0 0 0 0 $ 3,187.50 Fink 210.50 . . .
. . . S 83°50'42" E 210.50 feet; 582. S 81°30'12" E 195.47 feet; 583. S 73°38'32" E 249.36 feet; 584. . . .
. . . disposition of the “timeliness” issue in agreeing with ITC’s waiver of the 30-day requirement of Rule 210.50 . . . motion for termination, thus avoiding any need to consider waiver of the 30-day requirement of Rule 210.50 . . . could not have known that the ITC would interpret them as motions for summary determination under Rule 210.50 . . . totally unaware of the need to file motion 52-250 as a motion for summary determination under Rule 210.50 . . . Waiver of the time requirement imposed by Rule 210.50 is a matter committed to ITC discretion. . . . There is no inconsistency between a rule imposing a time requirement, e. g., Rule 210.50, and a rule . . . Rule 210.50, 19 CFR § 210.50 (1979) provides in pertinent part: Summary determinations. . . .
. . . disposition of the timeliness issue in agreeing with ITC’s waiver of the 30-day requirement of rule 210.50 . . . motion for termination, thus avoiding any need to consider waiver of the 30-day requirement of rule 210.50 . . . The ITC found sufficient reasons to waive the 30-day requirement of rule 210.50. . . . totally unaware of the need to file motion 52-250 as a motion for summary determination under rule 210.50 . . . Waiver of the time requirement imposed by rule 210.50 is a matter committed to ITC discretion. . . . Southwire argues that the ITC failed to abide by rule 201.1 , saying that rule 210.50, a rule of special . . . Rule 210.50,19 CFR 210.50 (1979) provides in pertinent part: Summary determinations. . . .
. . . Lindsay had no income except the Social Security payments (the reduced total of which will now be $210.50 . . .
. . . It determined that the policy had a cash value of $210.50 as of November 2, 1930. . . . without deciding it, but for the purposes of this opinion we shall assume that the lower figure of $210.50 . . . Assuming $210.50 to be the “cash value” on November 2, 1930, we must subtract from it the amount of the . . . Assuming that the interest had been paid, and that the cash value was $210.50, the “net cash value” is . . . $210.50 minus $191 or $19.50. (3) The Amount of “continued term insurance”. . . .
. . . .$7,320 of the agreed compensation was withheld as liquidated damages and $210.50 as additional costs . . .
. . . in making payment the Government deducted for the aforesaid delay the sum of $7,530.50 (including $210.50 . . .