The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . The Commission Rule at issue in Syntex has since been re-codified as Commission Rule 210.12. . . .
. . . . §§ 133.11, 133.22, 148.55, 210.12. . . .
. . . . § 210.12 authorize complaints to be filed with the ITC for investigation into alleged unfair practices . . .
. . . . § 210.12 (2005) (providing general definitions under the OPM regulations). . . . .
. . . certification included the provisions in the Hospital Manual, including the provisions in Sections 260.1 and 210.12 . . . Between July 1986 and November 1994, § 210.12 of the Hospital Manual stated in part that "[s]ervices . . .
. . . . § 210.12(c)(6) (1986). . . . for other damages, if any, suffered by the depository bank as a proximate consequence. 12 C.F.R. § 210.12 . . . following the deadline for return of the item as specified in paragraph (a) of this section. 12 C.F.R. § 210.12 . . .
. . . posting is not complete until the midnight deadline found in 12 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 210.12 . . .
. . . . § 210.12(c)(3) (1988), the Sun Bank court held that wire notices “must include certain information, . . . However, 12 C.F.R. § 210.12(c)(3) did not become effective until October 1, 1985, several months after . . . See 12 C.F.R. § 210.12 (1985). Consequently, 12 C.F.R. § 210.12(c) is inapplicable in this case. . . . is returned “to the bank located in a state that first handled the item for collection.” 12 C.F.R. § 210.12 . . . This return would satisfy 12 C.F.R. § 210.12(c) (1988). . . .
. . . . § 210.12(c). For the reasons assigned, we reverse, render, and remand for further proceedings. . . . Under Regulation J, 12 C.F.R. § 210.12, Lake Country’s deadline for notifying LANB that it was returning . . . Section 210.12(c) provides in pertinent part: A paying bank that receives a cash item in the amount of . . . As a consequence LANB sustained a loss, one envisioned by 12 C.F.R. § 210.12(c)(6): A paying bank that . . . Under section 210.12(c)(6), Lake Country is liable to the FDIC for that amount. . . .
. . . . § 210.12(c)(1) and (2). . . . the depositary bank would have incurred even if the paying bank had used ordinary care. 12 C.F.R. § 210.12 . . . Regulation J, 12 C.F.R. § 210.12(a)(1) and (2). . . . By operation of § 210.12(a)(1) and § 210.12(c)(2), a payor bank ordinarily must notify the depositary . . .
. . . . § 210.12(c)(3) (1988) prevailed over the UCC standard with regard to Federal Reserve’s liability. . . . . § 210.12(c)(6) and (7) (1988). The action came before the Court for a three-day bench trial. . . . See 12 C.F.R. § 210.12(c)(3) (1988). . . .
. . . . § 210.12(c)(2) (1988). . . .
. . . .-32; 210.12; 372.316; 523.14; 849.12; 932.704, Fla.Stat. (1981), (relating to state attorney's independent . . .
. . . 1980, ITC voted to dismiss Syntex’s revised complaint of October 24,1979, in accordance with 19 CFR 210.12 . . . that “approximately 335 entries of cal pan some dating back to 1974 were unliquidated ... . ” . 19 CFR 210.12 . . . Commission on February 12,1980, on the grounds that the complaint was not properly filed under ITC rule 210.12 . . .
. . . 1980, ITC voted to dismiss Syntex’s revised complaint of October 24, 1979, in accordance with 19 CFK 210.12 . . . investigation) that “approximately 335 entries of cal pan some dating back to 1974 were unliquidated * * 19 CFR 210.12 . . . Commission on February 12, 1980, on the grounds that the complaint was not properly filed under ITC rule 210.12 . . .
. . . provides that a payor bank may return “an unpaid item in accordance with the provisions of Section 210.12 . . . provided that the time for return not be extended by any special collection agreement. 12 C.F.R. § 210.12 . . . claims that Request impermissibly extends Bank’s midnight deadline in violation of Regulation J, § 210.12 . . . Compare 12 C.F.R. § 210.8 (Presentment of non-cash items for acceptance) with § 210.12 (Return of cash . . .
. . . . § 210.12(a) (Emphasis added). . . . states: If a paying bank returns to us an unpaid cash item in accordance with the provisions of section 210.12 . . .
. . . The schedule prescribed by § 210.12-03 shall be filed with respect to each person among the underwriters . . . The schedule prescribed by § 210.12-03 is the following: Amounts receivable from underwriters, promoters . . .
. . . if it fails to settle for demand items before the close of its banking day of receipt, and Section 210.12 . . .
. . . . §§ 210.3, 210.12. Federal Reserve Bank of St. . . .
. . . follows: Addition to tax Year Deficiency under sec. 6653(b) 1963_ $1,187.48 1964_ 1,987.80 1965_- $420.23 210.12 . . .
. . . Regulation J, § 210.12 of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 12 C.F.R. 210.12 (1969 . . .
. . . if it fails to settle for demand items before the close of its banking day of receipt, and Section 210.12 . . .
. . . the parties that the “midnight deadline” for these items as established by Regulation J, 12 C.F.R. 210.12 . . . These facts establish a prima facie ease for the application of 12 C.F.R. 210.12 and 12A O.S.A. 4-302 . . .
. . . See also Regulation J, Federal Reserve Board, 12 C.F.R. 210, Oct. 1, 1969, at Section 210.12 — return . . .
. . . Treasury and on March 28, 1936, the balance of the moneys remaining in the Court, amounting to $3,-210.12 . . .
. . . , signed by its cashier, Sprick, stating that the Eureka Bank credited the Strasburg Bank with $10,-210.12 . . .
. . . Diack in this amount was 3í)1/skoi or $210.12, and the interest of William Diack in said sum of $2,101 . . .