Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 163.32466 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 163.32466 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 163.32466 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 163.32466

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 163
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS
View Entire Chapter
163.32466 Readoption by ordinance of plan amendments adopted pursuant to former s. 163.32465, subject to local referendum.A comprehensive plan amendment adopted pursuant to former s. 163.32465 subject to voter referendum by local charter, and found in compliance before June 2, 2011, may be readopted by ordinance, shall become effective upon approval by the local government, and is not subject to review or challenge pursuant to the provisions of former s. 163.32465 or s. 163.3184.
History.ss. 76, 80, ch. 2011-139; s. 11, ch. 2015-2.

F.S. 163.32466 on Google Scholar

F.S. 163.32466 on CourtListener

Amendments to 163.32466


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 163.32466

Total Results: 1  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Anderson v. City of St. Pete Beach, 161 So. 3d 548 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 16830, 2014 WL 5151321

...Neiberger of Bryant Miller Olive, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellees. Jonathan D. Kaney, Jr., and Jonathan D. Kaney, III, of Kaney & Olivari, P.L., Ormond Beach, for Amicus Curiae First Amendment Foundation, Inc. KELLY, Judge. James Anderson appeals from a final judgment finding section 163.32466, Florida Statutes (2011), constitutional. He argues the trial court erred in concluding that section 163.32466 was not a special law enacted without the notice required by article III, section 10 of the Florida Constitution....
...Garnett, Lorraine Huhn, Marvin Shavlan, and James Parent; and Mayor Steve McFarlin on his claim that they violated section 286.011, Florida Statutes (2011), Florida's Government in the Sunshine Law, by discussing and orchestrating the passage of section 163.32466, amendments to the City's Charter, and an amendment to the City's comprehensive plan during a series of seven shade meetings....
...We also conclude that the trial court erred when it entered summary judgment on Anderson's claim that the appellees violated the Sunshine Law. -2- Anderson's primary argument is that Ordinance 2011-19 is invalid because it was enacted pursuant to section 163.32466, which he contends is unconstitutional....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.