The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Almond’s gross salary which compares with a monthly aggregate deduction of $159.29 indicated at trial . . .
. . . Sections 159.27(4), 159.28 and 159.29, Florida Statutes. . . . Pursuant to Section 159.29, Florida Statutes, no financing agreement for a project shall be entered into . . .
. . . . § 159.29(2), Fla. Stat. (1983). . . .
. . . Section 159.29, Florida Statutes (1981), sets out the criteria by which local agencies are to be guided . . . In essence, section 159.29 requires the local agency to conclude that the project will promote the economic . . . In assessing appellant’s argument it is important to note that section 159.29 also provides: “[H]owever . . . See § 159.29, Fla.Stat. (1981). . . . The appellant also questions the necessity or propriety, under section 159.29, of certain decisions of . . .
. . . properly adopted, that the bonds would not constitute a public debt, that the criteria set out in section 159.29 . . . Section 159.29 states that “the determination of the local agency as to compliance with [this section . . .
. . . Section 159.29 of the Acts says that in undertaking a project the local agency shall be guided by and . . . In the opinion validating the bonds, we said: Fla.Stat. § 159.29, F.S.A. provides that the determination . . . Accordingly, we deem the requirements of Fla.Stat. § 159.29, F.S.A. to have been satisfied by the Port . . .
. . . . § 159.29, F.S.A., the resolution also determined: (1) that the project would make a significant contribution . . . Fla.Stat. § 159.29, F.S.A. provides that the determination of the local agency as to compliance with . . . Accordingly, we deem the requirements of Fla.Stat. § 159.29, F.S.A. to have been satisfied by the Port . . .
. . . . § 159.29(1), F.S.A. . . . In fact, § 159.29 provides that such determination by the local agency as to compliance with such criteria . . .
. . . when it purchased the bond, but during the same period, there was an accrual of coupon interest of $159.29 . . .
. . . Of this $287, $159.29 was paid to appellant in satisfaction of a prior loan, representing $158.19 principal . . .
. . . second loan, the loan company drew a check to the order of the bankrupt and his wife for the sum of $159.29 . . .
. . . On said shipments land-grant deductions of $159.29 were made by the plaintiff in stating its bills. . . .