The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS

Chapter 106
CAMPAIGN FINANCING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 106.05

106.05 Deposit of contributions; statement of campaign treasurer.—All funds received by the campaign treasurer of any candidate or political committee shall, prior to the end of the 5th business day following the receipt thereof, Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays excluded, be deposited in a campaign depository designated pursuant to s. 106.021, in an account that contains the name of the candidate or committee. Except for contributions to political committees made by payroll deduction, all deposits shall be accompanied by a bank deposit slip containing the name of each contributor and the amount contributed by each. If a contribution is deposited in a secondary campaign depository, the depository shall forward the full amount of the deposit, along with a copy of the deposit slip accompanying the deposit, to the primary campaign depository prior to the end of the 1st business day following the deposit.

History.—s. 5, ch. 73-128; s. 1, ch. 76-88; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 43, ch. 77-175; s. 7, ch. 89-256; s. 29, ch. 90-315; s. 8, ch. 2013-37.

F.S. 106.05 on Google Scholar

F.S. 106.05 on Casetext

Amendments to 106.05

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 106.05

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 106.05.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY LLC,, 588 B.R. 347 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . See, e.g. , 16 Moore's Federal Practice - Civil § 106.05[10] (2018). . . .

SALAZAR, v. SAN JUAN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER C. SJCDC Dr. RN, v. C. v. C. SJCDC Dr. v. C. SJCDC Dr., 301 F. Supp. 3d 992 (D.N.M. 2017)

. . . Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice § 106.05[5], at 106-31 (3d ed. 2009) ). . . .

TIDEWATER CONTRACTORS, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 131 Fed. Cl. 372 (Fed. Cl. 2017)

. . . See Subsection 106.05 of the [FP-03]. Id. at A401-02 (footnote added). 2. . . . 0.90 in QL-PAY, terminate production to allow plaintiff to take remedial action under FP-03 Section 106.05 . . . In particular, defendant avers that the instruction in FP-03 Section 106.05(b) to terminate production . . .

BURLEY, v. MILLER,, 241 F. Supp. 3d 828 (E.D. Mich. 2017)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 106.05[4], p. 106-27 (3d ed. 2009)). . . .

HEINSOHN, v. CARABIN SHAW, P. C., 832 F.3d 224 (5th Cir. 2016)

. . . Id. at 640, 129 S.Ct. 1862 (quoting 16 Moore's Federal Practice § 106.05[4] (3d ed. 2009)). . . . .

WORLEY, v. FLORIDA SECRETARY OF STATE, L., 717 F.3d 1238 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 106.05; • make all expenditures by check drawn from the campaign account, id. § 106.11(l)(a); • keep . . . account); avoid loss or comingling of funds by depositing money into that account promptly, see id. § 106.05 . . .

UNITED STATES v. P. BOND, PT- PT- PT-, 486 B.R. 9 (E.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . See 2 Collier on Bankruptcy § 106.05 (16th ed. 2009) (noting that Section 106(b) is significant because . . .

COHON, BASS, v. NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, 646 F.3d 717 (10th Cir. 2011)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 106.05[4], p. 106-27 (3d ed. 2009)). . . .

WORLEY v. K. ROBERTS, 749 F. Supp. 2d 1321 (N.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . treasurer and establish a campaign depository); § 106.03(l)(a) (register with the Division of Elections); § 106.05 . . .

HUKIC, v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES, 588 F.3d 420 (7th Cir. 2009)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 106.05[4], p. 106-27 (3d ed.2009)). . . .

CARLSBAD TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. HIF BIO, INC., 556 U.S. 635 (U.S. 2009)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice §106.05[4], p. 106-27 (3d ed. 2009). . . .

In ULZ, E. v. J., 388 B.R. 865 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2008)

. . . See 805 ILCS 105/106.05 (2006). It has no shareholders, and therefore it has no owner. . . .

In SUPREME BEEF PROCESSORS, INC. v., 468 F.3d 248 (5th Cir. 2006)

. . . See 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 106.05-07,(15th ed. rev.2004). . . .

In SUPREME BEEF PROCESSORS, INC. v., 468 F.3d 248 (5th Cir. 2006)

. . . See 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 106.05-.07,(15th ed. rev.2004). . . .

KENNEDY, v. R. W. C. INC. A. Jr. C., 359 F. Supp. 2d 636 (E.D. Mich. 2005)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 106.05[7] (3d ed.2004) (observing that “[bjecause there is nothing . . .

SULLIVAN, v. METRO- NORTH RAILROAD CO., 179 F. Supp. 2d 2 (D. Conn. 2002)

. . . Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 106.05 (3d ed.2001). . . .

R. PARRISH, v. HBO COMPANY,, 85 F. Supp. 2d 792 (S.D. Ohio 1999)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 106.05[5] (3d ed.1999) (citing H.R.Rep. . . .

In A. STRAIGHT L. a. k. a. WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, v. A. STRAIGHT L., 143 F.3d 1387 (10th Cir. 1998)

. . . This enactment codifies the Gardner rule, see 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 106.05 (15th ed. rev.1997), but . . .

In A. STRAIGHT L. a. k. a. WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, v. A. STRAIGHT L., 143 F.3d 1387 (10th Cir. 1998)

. . . This enactment codifies the Gardner rule, see 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 106.05 (15th ed. rev.1997), but . . .

J. CONNER, v. MID SOUTH INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., 943 F. Supp. 663 (W.D. La. 1996)

. . . Memorandum Defendants’ As corrected calculations by Plaintiff Motion for summary judgment 106.05 101.25 . . .

In RODRIGUEZ, 79 F.3d 467 (5th Cir. 1996)

. . . Sections 106.05, and 106.06 of the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code states that it is illegal for minors . . .

UNITED STATES v. REID,, 911 F.2d 1456 (10th Cir. 1990)

. . . seven to nine different sales of varying quantities to defendant and, at a minimum, he sold defendant 106.05 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ROCKFORD MEMORIAL CORPORATION, 898 F.2d 1278 (7th Cir. 1990)

. . . Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 32, ¶ 106.05. So the clause we have labeled [1] would seem not to apply. . . .

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS, v. NATIONAL REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATION, INC., 894 F.2d 937 (7th Cir. 1990)

. . . Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 32, ¶¶ 106.05, 106.10, 107.03. . . .

UNITED BISCUIT COMPANY OF AMERICA, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,, 350 F.2d 615 (7th Cir. 1965)

. . . 628 .56 6 0.03 December 1959 Independents: Better Poods, Inc. 21.86 0 0.00 1.31 Gene’s Super Market 106.05 . . .

AMERICAN AUTO PARTS COMPANY, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 162 Ct. Cl. 23 (Ct. Cl. 1963)

. . . plaintiff informed the supply officer at Crane by letter that it was changing its bid on item 8 from $106.05 . . .

ALMA BLABON, ET AL. v. THE UNITED STATES, 146 Ct. Cl. 13 (Ct. Cl. 1959)

. . . Lane was for the period ending September 31 [sic], 1941 in an amount of * * * US$106.05 * * Born January . . . At the rate of $106.05 per quarter. . . .

E. Sr. v., 28 T.C. 12 (T.C. 1957)

. . . The additions to the tax under section 294 (d) for that year exceeded the overassessment shown by $106.05 . . . and mathematically a net deficiency of $106.05 was determined for that year. . . . statutory notice sent by the Commissioner shows that he has determined a deficiency in the net amount of $106.05 . . .

In HOAG, 62 F. Supp. 527 (D. Vt. 1945)

. . . Unsecured 106.05 Strong Hardware Co., Burlington, Vt. . . .