The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . .] § 103.101 against any of the plaintiffs ... unless and until that section and L.A.M.C. § 12.26 and . . . shall not base a suspension or revocation [of an adult arcade permit] upon the grounds set forth in 103.101 . . . Amending the 1991 version of Section 103.101 after [Thomas ] and [ZJ. . . .
. . . Stat. (2003); see also § 103.101, Fla. . . .
. . . Los Angeles Municipal Code §§ 103.101(i), (j). . . .
. . . . § 103.101(2)(c) (1991). . . .
. . . . § 1983 in the District Court for the Southern District of Florida challenging Florida Statutes § 103.101 . . . FACTS Florida Statutes § 103.101 entitled “Presidential preference primary” is the exclusive vehicle . . . Pursuant to § 103.101(2)(a), following the plaintiffs’ submissions, the representatives of the Florida . . . Fla.Stat. § 103.101(2)(c) (1991) (emphasis added). In Duke v. . . . Fla.Stat. § 103.101(2) (1991) (emphasis added). . . . .
. . . primary ballot scheduled for March 10, 1992 and to declare the procedure set forth in Florida Statute § 103.101 . . . Statute Section 103.101 of the Florida Statutes provides in relevant part: (2) There shall be a Presidential . . . Fla.Stat. § 103.101(2)(a), (b), (c). . . . If the actions of the Presidential Candidate Selection Committee created by Florida Statute § 103.101 . . . It is clear upon a review of Fla.Stat. §§ 103.091, 103.101, Kay, v. . . .
. . . Plaintiffs also sought a declaration that Florida Statute Section 103.101 was unconstitutionally void . . . Section (2)(c) of Florida Statute 103.101, the main target of plaintiffs’ constitutional challenge, was . . .
. . . Stat.Ann., § 103.101. . . . .
. . . . § 103.101; (2) the nomination of presidential electors, pursuant to Fla.Stat.Ann. § 103.021(1); (3) . . . Stat.Ann. § 103.101 (1982 & Supp.1983). . . . The provisions touching most closely on this issue are those in § 103.101(8) which permit delegates to . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. § 103.101(6) (1982). . . . See Fla.Stat.Ann. §§ 100.11 l(3)(b) and 103.101(5). . . .
. . . . § 103.101. . . .
. . . Quinn is not entitled to have his name on the presidential preference ballot pursuant to F.S. section 103.101 . . . . § 103.101, F.S.A., as amended by Ch. 71-236, Laws of Florida (1971). . . . Fla.Stat. § 103.101(3) (b), F.S.A. . . . Stat. § 103.101, F.S.A., can hardly be an unconstitutional invasion of rights; it is instead a preservation . . . correctly delineated the issues and properly held Chapter 71-236, Laws of Florida, amending Fla.Stat. § 103.101 . . . “PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS: POLITICAL PARTIES; COMMITTEES “E.S. 103.101 Presidential preference primary.— . . .
. . . CARLTON, Justice (dissenting): I strongly dissent on the basis that Section (4) of Fla.Stat. 103.101, . . . Thus Fla.Stat. 103.101(4) F.S.A. puts upon the ballot all those recognized under the statute as candidates . . . In summary, I conclude that Section (4) of Fla.Stat. 103.101, F.S.A. violates the right of privacy discussed . . . ERVIN, Justice (dissenting): We are concerned today with the constitutionality of Section 103.101(4), . . . It appears to me that the requirements of Section 103.101(4) must yield to the constitutional rights . . . Although Section 103.101 was not in effect at that time, the Battaglia holding regarding the constitutional . . . Adams we must find Section 103.101(4), Florida Statutes, F.S.A. unconstitutional insofar as it forces . . . To be constitutional, Section 103.101(4), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., must permit a potential candidate . . . .-101(3) (a) and 103.101(4), F.S.A. contested here. . . . S. 103.101 Presidential preference primary.— “(1) This act shall be known and may be cited as the Florida . . .
. . . unpledged slate of delegates to the Republican National Convention, as authorized by our statute, Sec. 103.101 . . .
. . . Booth, Fla., 56 So.2d 716, 718; this Court said: “This Subsection 7 of Section 103.101 was enacted for . . .
. . . Rights were asserted under Section 103.101 (-7), F.S., F.S.A., the same being part of the election code . . . In deciding the question, the Court construed subsection (7) of Section 103.101 F.S., F.S.A. . . .