The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS

Chapter 101
VOTING METHODS AND PROCEDURE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 101.20

101.20 Publication of ballot form; sample ballots.—

(1) Two sample ballots shall be furnished to each polling place by the officer whose duty it is to provide official ballots. The sample ballots shall be in the form of the official ballot as it will appear at that polling place on election day. Sample ballots shall be open to inspection by all electors in any election, and a sufficient number of reduced-size ballots may be furnished to election officials so that one may be given to any elector desiring same.

(2)(a) Upon completion of the list of qualified candidates, a sample ballot shall be published by the supervisor in a newspaper of general circulation in the county, before the day of election.

(b) In lieu of the publication required under paragraph (a), a supervisor may send a sample ballot to each registered elector by e-mail at least 7 days before an election if an e-mail address has been provided and the elector has opted to receive a sample ballot by electronic delivery. If an e-mail address has not been provided, or if the elector has not opted for electronic delivery, a sample ballot may be mailed to each registered elector or to each household in which there is a registered elector at least 7 days before an election.

History.—s. 5, ch. 26870, 1951; s. 8, ch. 57-166; s. 9, ch. 65-380; s. 1, ch. 75-174; s. 16, ch. 77-175; s. 2, ch. 2013-192; s. 12, ch. 2019-162.

F.S. 101.20 on Google Scholar

F.S. 101.20 on Casetext

Amendments to 101.20

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 101.20

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 101.20.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

UTTER v. COLCLAZIER a k a, 714 F. App'x 872 (10th Cir. 2017)

. . . Stat. tit. 70, §§ 6-101.20 to .32 (TDPA); (III) the Board Members violated Oklahoma’s Open Meeting Act . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. TITO CONTRACTORS, INC., 847 F.3d 724 (D.C. Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 101.20(c) (2014). . . .

In HANNON ABCD LLC, ABC D LLC, v., 512 B.R. 1 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2014)

. . . behalf of Debtors” and broke down the payments into the following categories: _May_June Cable_$97.84 $101.20 . . .

In HOSSEINI, v. N. A., 504 B.R. 558 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2013)

. . . According to the Cost Bill Itemization, the debtor sought $101.20 for copying and printing (mostly for . . .

In TEXAS WYOMING DRILLING, INC. v. II, LLC, In v. LLC, LLC, E., 422 B.R. 612 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2010)

. . . See 15 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 101.20 (Matthew Bender 3d ed.2009). . . .

DIAZ A. AFL- CIO AFL- CIO v. M. COBB, C., 541 F. Supp. 2d 1319 (S.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . See § 101.20, Fla. Stat. (2007). • Conduct Early Voting. . . .

ADVISORY OPINION TO ATTORNEY GENERAL RE REFERENDA REQUIRED FOR ADOPTION, 963 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 2007)

. . . Office of Economic and Demographic Research’s websites in the publication or mailing required by s. 101.20 . . .

In E. BLI R. In BLI,, 309 B.R. 295 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2004)

. . . King et al., Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 101.20[1] (15th ed. rev. May 2003) (citing Potmesil v. . . .

NUNLEY, v. PIONEER PLEASANT VALE SCHOOL DISTRICT, 149 F. Supp. 2d 1283 (W.D. Okla. 2001)

. . . Stat. tit. 20, § 6-101.20 et seq., does not provide protection for an individual seeking employment as . . .

CREEKMORE v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, A., 116 F. Supp. 2d 767 (E.D. Tex. 2000)

. . . MooRe Et Al., MooRe’s Federal Practice § 101.20 (Bd ed.2000). . . .

In M. VOGT,, 250 B.R. 250 (Bankr. M.D. La. 2000)

. . . The past due wage amounted to some $412.50, and the daily wage rate at the time of termination was $101.20 . . . amount of $328,900, the employee would have to work 365 days per year (at the court-found daily rate of $101.20 . . .

LANCASTER, v. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO., 149 F.3d 1228 (10th Cir. 1998)

. . . Stat. tit. 70, §§ 6-101.20-.30 (West 1998). . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. HOLDSWORTH,, 990 F. Supp. 1274 (D. Colo. 1998)

. . . . § 101.20-305 can only be applied to actions that occurred on government property. . . .

ILLINOIS CONFERENCE OF TEAMSTERS AND EMPLOYERS WELFARE FUND, v. STEVE GILBERT TRUCKING,, 953 F. Supp. 1026 (C.D. Ill. 1997)

. . . forwarded that contribution report to the Fund accompanied by a cheek in the appropriate amount of $101.20 . . .

PARKER, v. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. I- OF OKMULGEE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA,, 82 F.3d 952 (10th Cir. 1996)

. . . teachers in Oklahoma, known as the “Teacher Due Process Act of 1990” or TDPA Okla.Stat.Ann. tit. 70, §§ 6-101.20 . . .

In MOORE, J. NEWSOM, J. v. MOORE,, 186 B.R. 962 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 1995)

. . . Compensatory Damages: $101.20 Punitive Damages: $-0- Sixth Cause of Action (Negligence) (failure of Moore . . . se, but also upon wilful infliction of emotional distress (for which compensatory damages of only $101.20 . . . Cause of Action, a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress that resulted in award of $101.20 . . .

HEALTHCARE RESOURCES CORP. v. DISTRICT NATIONAL UNION OF HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES, AFSCME, AFL- CIO,, 878 F. Supp. 732 (E.D. Pa. 1995)

. . . . § 101.20 (1994). . . .

WALSH, v. FINN,, 865 F. Supp. 126 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . Velardo filed an inmate misbehavior report charging Plaintiff, Michael Walsh, with violating Inmate Rules 101.20 . . . Inmate Rules 101.20 and 101.10 provide respectively that “inmates shall not intentionally expose the . . .

REICH, v. COLE ENTERPRISES, INC., 901 F. Supp. 255 (S.D. Ohio 1993)

. . . Joe D. 71.76 Eduardo, Rosemarie 330.29 Hatfield, Carolyn 149.38 Kennedy, Sylvia 243.75 Lawson, Anita 101.20 . . .

NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, v. S. KING, AFL- CIO,, 798 F. Supp. 780 (D.D.C. 1992)

. . . . § 101.20-403. . . .

DOLPHIN OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 582 So. 2d 709 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Dolphin paid $101.20 on February 27, 1989, for a Polk County building permit, and a three year advertising . . .

DOSTON, v. T. DUFFY,, 732 F. Supp. 857 (N.D. Ill. 1988)

. . . obligations, unless the Department determines there is good cause for refusing (see 89 Ill.Adm.Code 101.20 . . .

PRECISION SPECIALTY CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 15 Cl. Ct. 1 (Cl. Ct. 1988)

. . . . § 8-101.20, and provides as follows: Settlement proposal means a termination claim submitted by a contractor . . . define a “settlement proposal” to mean "a termination claim submitted by a contractor" (32 C.F.R. § 8-101.20 . . .

FEDERAL LAND BANK OF COLUMBIA, v. McNEAL,, 77 B.R. 315 (S.D. Ga. 1987)

. . . In the Matter of Bernard Armstrong, 812 F.2d 1024, 1026 (7th Cir.1987); Collier on Bankruptcy, Sec. 101.20 . . .

In J. HASCHKE C., 77 B.R. 223 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1987)

. . . The list is not intended to be all-inclusive. 2 Collier on Bankruptcy, 15 Ed., Para. 101.20, p. 101-48 . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. ELIXIR INDUSTRIES,, 682 F.2d 867 (9th Cir. 1982)

. . . . § 101.20 (1981). The hearing officer makes no findings or recommendations. . . .

GRIFFIN v. OCEANIC CONTRACTORS, INC., 458 U.S. 564 (U.S. 1982)

. . . The District Court found that the daily wage to be used in computing the penalty was $101.20. . . . The court found that the daily wage rate to be used in calculating the penalty was $101.20. . . . The District Court computed that sum by doubling his daily wage of $101.20 and multiplying that amount . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. H. S. CAMP SONS, INC., 542 F. Supp. 411 (M.D. Fla. 1982)

. . . showing that from May 31, 1975 through November 1, 1978, the average weekly pay of white employees was $101.20 . . .

A. TOWNSEND v. S. CARMEL, 494 F. Supp. 30 (D.D.C. 1979)

. . . . § 101.20-304 unconstitutional, and (2) is the government liable for false arrest, false imprisonment . . . I. 41 C.F.R. § 101.20-304 Defendants contend that the regulation is valid because (1) the Pentagon is . . . Court understands Defendants’ failure to offer a narrow construction of the regulation—41 C.F.R. § 101.20 . . . from both the plain meaning of the regulation and its application in the instant case, 41 C.F.R. § 101.20 . . . Indeed, arrests are made pursuant to 41 C.F.R. § 101.20-304 precisely to vindicate affronts to police . . .

CIHACEK, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, AFL- CIO- CLC,, 464 F. Supp. 940 (D. Neb. 1979)

. . . Alleging a violation of NLRB Rule 101.20(b) has taken place, plaintiff contends that his First, Fifth . . .

INTERNATIONAL TELEPHONE TELEGRAPH CORP. COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS DIVISION v. LOCAL INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL- CIO,, 419 U.S. 428 (U.S. 1975)

. . . or field examiner attached to the regional office but may be another qualified official.” 29 CFR § 101.20 . . .

BARRUS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,, 483 F.2d 191 (4th Cir. 1973)

. . . The Board’s rules and regulations describe a representation hearing as follows: “§ 101.20 Formal Hearing . . . purpose of obtaining a full statement of pertinent facts in representation election hearings, 29 C.F.R. § 101.20 . . . . § 101.20(c) (1972). In so doing, he may attack evidence introduced by either party. . . .

v., 51 T.C. 971 (T.C. 1969)

. . . and interest shall be due and payable in monthly installments of One Hundred One and 20/100 Dollars ($101.20 . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. CAROLINA NATURAL GAS CORPORATION,, 386 F.2d 571 (4th Cir. 1967)

. . . The Board, in its published Statements of Procedure, Section 101.20(c) (29 C.F.R. 101.20(c)), formally . . .

UNITED STATES v. MERCHANTS MUTUAL BONDING COMPANY, a v. R. L. MADISON, M., 242 F. Supp. 465 (N.D. Iowa 1965)

. . . The Government surrenders its claim of $101.20 unearned warehousing charges paid by Commodity Credit . . .

G. BARNHART, v. AMERICAN OIL COMPANY,, 237 F. Supp. 492 (E.D. Va. 1965)

. . . As of July 23, 1962, he was on a salary of $101.20 per week for a forty-hour week- — apparently a better . . .

FOWLER v. W. WIRTZ,, 236 F. Supp. 22 (S.D. Fla. 1964)

. . . See generally NLRB Statements of Procedure, Series 8, Sections 101.17-101.20; 29 C.F.R. . . . Sections 101.17-101.20. . . .

HERFF, v. J. M. ROUNTREE, G. HERFF,, 140 F. Supp. 201 (M.D. Tenn. 1956)

. . . the property which was conveyed to Southwestern, as of the time of conveyance, had a value of $44,-101.20 . . .

KEARNEY TRECKER CORP. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, 209 F.2d 782 (7th Cir. 1953)

. . . represented, the report and analysis of the hearing officer made to the Board as provided for in Sec. 101.20 . . . referred to as a part of the investigation; in fact,' the Board in its Statements of Procedure Sec. 101.20 . . .

In ANN ARBOR BREWING CO., 110 F. Supp. 111 (E.D. Mich. 1951)

. . . Unemployment Compensation Commission claim for 3rd quarter 1949 contributions tax in the amount of $101.20 . . .

B. v., 6 T.C. 930 (T.C. 1946)

. . . Petitioner claims an overassessment for that year according to his petition in the amount of $101.20, . . .

In MIDLAND UNITED CO., 64 F. Supp. 399 (D. Del. 1946)

. . . petitions filed by the applicants will be allowed as prayed for with the exception of the amount of $101.20 . . .

BONNER v. SUITER, 112 F.2d 912 (10th Cir. 1940)

. . . 87.50 35.00 70.00 JO. 00 33.25 JO 3,250.00 81.25 32.50 65.00 108.79 29.00 it 3,500.00 87.50 35.00 70.00 101.20 . . .

v., 14 F. 241 (C.C.E.D. Pa. 1882)

. . . , on the boys was - $43.60 On the two angels, - - - - - - 97.60 And on the throe seasons, - - - - - 101.20 . . . claimed to bo due by the said plaintiffs, then they find forthe said plaintiffs in the further sum of $101.20 . . .