...The jury's verdict pertaining to rent damages in the amount of $4,320 is not supported by the record. Appellee argues that the award can be justified on the theory that the Carharts are entitled to claim double rent pursuant to section
83.06 [2] or *374 section
83.58, Florida Statutes (1987). Section
83.06 applies only to "nonresidential tenancies," and requires a demand for double rent. It clearly is not applicable here. Nor do we think section
83.58 applies to this case....
...The evidence in this record supports (at best) only an award of $3,200.00. I would affirm as to that amount. The Carharts argued they were entitled to claim double rent because of the Casavans' seven and one-half month's retention of possession of the premises, pursuant to section
83.06 or section
83.58, Florida Statutes (1985)....