Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 83.001 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 83.001 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 83.001 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 83.001

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 83
LANDLORD AND TENANT
View Entire Chapter
83.001 Application.This part applies to nonresidential tenancies and all tenancies not governed by part II of this chapter.
History.s. 1, ch. 73-330.

F.S. 83.001 on Google Scholar

F.S. 83.001 on CourtListener

Amendments to 83.001


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 83.001

Total Results: 19  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Stephen Sultenfuss, Charles McMulling v. Wayne Snow, Jr., James T. Morris, Mobley Howell, Michael H. Wing, Bettye O. Hutchings, Michael J. Bowers, 35 F.3d 1494 (11th Cir. 1994).

Cited 46 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 27817, 1994 WL 538702

at 11, 99 S.Ct. at 2106 (quoting Neb. Rev.Stat. § 83-1,114(1) (1976)). . Id. at 18-19, 99 S.Ct. at 2109
Copy

Sheradsky v. Basadre, 452 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

was disbursed to the complex owners monthly. See § 83.01, Fla. Stat. (1983). The damages assessed at trial
Copy

Hamilton v. Tanner, 962 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 2254572

deemed to be a month-to-month tenancy at will. § 83.01, Fla. Stat. (1997). Such a lease does not violate
Copy

Rosamond v. Mann, 80 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 1955).

Cited 9 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 49 A.L.R. 2d 476

1 of the 1905 act (now incorporated in F.S.A. § 83.01) by providing that any lease not in writing and
Copy

Pensacola Scrap Processors, Inc. v. State Road Dept., 188 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5061

accords with reason and justice. Under F.S. Section 83.01, F.S.A., if a tenant at will without a written
Copy

Drum v. Pure Oil Co., 184 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

the authorities in other jurisdictions. F.S.A. § 83.01 provides that any lease of lands and tenements
Copy

Mangum v. Susser, 764 So. 2d 653 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 574417

deemed to be a month-to-month tenancy at will. § 83.01, Fla. Stat. (1997). Such a lease does not violate
Copy

Bldg. B1, LLC v. Component Repair Servs., Inc., 224 So. 3d 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 2961117, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9956

became a month-to-month tenancy pursuant to section 83.01, Florida Statutes (2006). 3 However
Copy

Hasty v. Chain (In Re Hasty), 25 B.R. 429 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1982).

Cited 2 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 5405

month-to-month tenancy at will was created pursuant to § 83.01 Fla.Stat. (Supp.1981). While it is not clear whether
Copy

Keeton Corr., Inc. v. Rj & Rk, Inc., 858 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 22453887

refuses to honor the terms of a written lease. Section 83.01, Florida Statutes (2000), states that a lease
Copy

Stanley Longo v. Seminole Indian Casino-Immokalee, 813 F.3d 1348 (11th Cir. 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 3160, 2016 WL 722526

federally recognized. See 25 C.F.R. § 83.1 (2015) (defining “[federally recognized Indian
Copy

Westgate & Wabasso, Corp. v. Word of Faith Cmty. Dev. Corp. (Fla. 4th DCA 2026).

Cited 1 times | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...3 See §§ 83.40–83.71, Fla. Stat. (2024). By contrast, Part I of Chapter 83 applies to nonresidential leases and contains no provisions governing the timing, manner, or interest applicable to the return of a security deposit. See §§ 83.001–83.37, Fla....
Copy

James v. City of St. Petersburg, 6 F.3d 1457 (11th Cir. 1993).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1993 WL 432521

25 B.R. 429 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1982). See Fla.Stat. § 83.01 (1967). . The city ordinances did not require
Copy

Alfran Corp. v. Park Isles, Inc. (In re Alfran Corp.), 7 B.R. 95 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1980).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 1980 Bankr. LEXIS 4164

rights are codified in this state. Florida Statutes § 83.01 et seq. (1979). Florida Statute § 83.04 (1979)
Copy

Edward A. Crapo, in his capacity as Alachua Cnty. Prop. Appraiser v. Academy for Five Element Acupuncture, Inc., a Florida Non-Profit Corp. (Fla. 1st DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

Id. (quoting Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 83(1), at 266) (emphasis added). The Court also
Copy

Gautreaux v. Notarantonio, 687 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 50, 1997 WL 1724

acquired; hence, that tenancy was terminable at will. § 83.01, Fla.Stat. (1995); Sill v. Smith, 177 So.2d 265
Copy

Farber v. Florida Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 427 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18648

will facilitate the parole hearing.” Neb Rev Stat § 83-1, 112(1) (1976). Apparently, the inmates are satisfied
Copy

Csc Serviceworks, Inc. v. Boca Bayou Condo. Ass'n, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

be construed to be a tenancy at sufferance.”); § 83.01, Fla. Stat. (2016) (“Any lease of lands and tenements
Copy

Beck v. Robb (In re KMM Corp.), 14 B.R. 348 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1981).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 1981 Bankr. LEXIS 3053

entered into a month to month tenancy. Fla.Stat. § 83.01. To terminate this tenancy, the Defendant was required