The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 79
HABEAS CORPUS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 79.02

79.02 Bond may be required.—When it appears necessary, the court, justice, or judge granting the writ shall require bond with surety to be approved by the judge or clerk payable to the Governor executed in such manner and reasonable penalty as the court, justice, or judge prescribes; conditioned for the payment of the charges and costs awarded against the prisoner and that he or she will not escape by the way. The bond shall be filed and may be sued on in the name of the Governor for the benefit of any person interested therein. In the event of inability to give bond for the payment of charges and costs, he or she may be permitted, in the place thereof, to make deposit in such amount as the court, justice, or judge requires.

History.—s. 1, Sept. 16, 1822; s. 1, ch. 3129, 1879; RS 1771; GS 2248; RGS 3571; CGL 5435; s. 29, ch. 67-254; s. 414, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 79.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 79.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 79.02

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 79.02

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 79.02.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

JEMINE, v. P. D. DENNIS, III, d b a d b a USA, 901 F. Supp. 2d 365 (E.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . 586.50 05/14/07-10/07/07 1821 114 254.94 Cook 02/29/08 Shannan $ 112.60 06/15/05- 07/16/05 2634 103 79.02 . . .

CELLULAR TECHNICAL SERVICES COMPANY, INC. v. TRUEPOSITION, INC., 609 F. Supp. 2d 223 (D. Conn. 2009)

. . . KSI as consisting of ten percent (10%) ownership by Plaintiffs, approximately seventy-nine percent (79.02% . . .

DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES, DFS LLC, v. VISA U. S. A. INC. VISA, 598 F. Supp. 2d 394 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . See also 4 Sand et al, Modern Federal Jury Instructions ¶ 79.02.[5] (“ ‘Injury’ differs from ‘damages . . .

GRAVEL AND SHEA, v. VERMONT NATIONAL BANK,, 162 B.R. 969 (D. Vt. 1993)

. . . See 7 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 79.02 (discussing Fed.R.Civ.P. 79, upon which 5003 is patterned, as . . .

UNITED STATES FOOTBALL LEAGUE, USFL IMI LAEFC, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, St. Co. NFL R., 842 F.2d 1335 (2d Cir. 1988)

. . . Repeating nearly verbatim the instruction set forth in Judge Sand's Modem Federal Jury Instructions ¶ 79.02 . . .

WESTERN ACCEPTANCE COMPANY, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 472 So. 2d 497 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Cavitch, Business Organizations § 79.02 (1982); Fletcher, supra at § 8804.2. . . .

A. M. SEAMON v. UPHAM,, 536 F. Supp. 931 (E.D. Tex. 1982)

. . . .-01, 76.02, 76.03, 76.04, 77, 78.01, 78.04, 78.05, 78.06, 78.07, 78.08, 78.09, 79.02, 79.03, 79.04, . . .

R. EULO v. DEVAL AERODYNAMICS, INC. a a A., 47 F.R.D. 35 (E.D. Pa. 1969)

. . . See, Moore, supra, 1968 Supplement, ¶ 58.02, pp. 25-26, and Vol. 7, 1968 Supplement, ¶ 79.02 [2], p. . . .

T. Jr. N. v., 42 T.C. 885 (T.C. 1964)

. . . . $23,000.00 191.67 22,808.33 Garage.. 79.02 266.79 256.79 Porch___ 300.00 150.00 150.00 Equipment. 198.00 . . .

v. Co., 11 Ct. Cust. 99 (C.C.P.A. 1921)

. . . The five readings of the first test of a portion of the sample taken resulted as follows: 79.02, 79.01 . . .