Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 68.084 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 68.084 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 68.084 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 68.084

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 68
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS
View Entire Chapter
68.084 Rights of the parties in civil actions.
(1) If the department, on behalf of the state, proceeds with the action, it has the primary responsibility for prosecuting the action, and is not bound by any act of the person bringing the action. The person bringing the action has the right to continue as a party to the action, subject to the limitations specified in subsection (2).
(2)(a) The department may at any point voluntarily dismiss the action notwithstanding the objections of the person initiating the action.
(b) Subject to s. 17.04, nothing in this act shall be construed to limit the authority of the department or the qui tam plaintiff to compromise a claim brought in a complaint filed under this act if the court determines, after a hearing, that the proposed settlement is fair, adequate, and reasonable under all the circumstances.
(c) Upon a showing by the department that unrestricted participation during the course of the litigation by the person initiating the action would interfere with or unduly delay the department’s prosecution of the case, or would be repetitious, irrelevant, or for purposes of harassment, the court may, in its discretion, impose limitations on the person’s participation, including, but not limited to:
1. Limiting the number of witnesses the person may call;
2. Limiting the length of the testimony of the person’s witnesses;
3. Limiting the person’s cross-examination of witnesses; or
4. Otherwise limiting the participation by the person in the litigation.
(d) Upon a showing by the defendant that unrestricted participation during the course of the litigation by the person initiating the action would be for purposes of harassment or would cause the defendant undue burden or unnecessary expense, the court may limit the participation by the person in the litigation.
(3) If the department elects not to proceed with the action, the person who initiated the action has the right to conduct the action. If the Attorney General, as head of the department, or the Chief Financial Officer, as head of the Department of Financial Services, so requests, it shall be served with copies of all pleadings and motions filed in the action along with copies of all deposition transcripts at the requesting department’s expense. When a person proceeds with the action, the court, without limiting the rights of the person initiating the action, may nevertheless permit the department to intervene and take over the action on behalf of the state at a later date upon showing of good cause.
(4) Regardless of whether the department proceeds with the action, upon a showing by the department that certain actions of discovery by the person initiating the action would interfere with an investigation by the state or the prosecution of a criminal or civil matter arising out of the same facts, the court may stay such discovery for a period of not more than 60 days. Such a showing shall be conducted in camera. The court may extend the 60-day period upon a further showing in camera by the department that the criminal or civil investigation or proceeding has been pursued with reasonable diligence and any proposed discovery in the civil action will interfere with an ongoing criminal or civil investigation or proceeding.
(5) Notwithstanding paragraph (2)(b), the state may elect to pursue its claim through any available alternate remedy, including any administrative proceeding to determine a civil money penalty. If any such alternate remedy is pursued in another proceeding, the person initiating the action shall have the same rights in such proceeding as the person would have had if the action had continued under this section. Any finding of fact or conclusion of law made in such other proceeding that has become final shall be conclusive on all parties to an action under this section. For purposes of this subsection, a finding or conclusion is final if it has been finally determined on appeal to the appropriate court, if all time for filing such an appeal with respect to the finding or conclusion has expired, or if the finding or conclusion is not subject to judicial review.
(6) The Department of Financial Services, or the department, may intervene on its own behalf as a matter of right.
History.s. 4, ch. 94-316; s. 104, ch. 2003-261; s. 4, ch. 2007-236; s. 5, ch. 2013-104.

F.S. 68.084 on Google Scholar

F.S. 68.084 on CourtListener

Amendments to 68.084


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 68.084

Total Results: 3  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

State of Florida v. Zoltan Barati & Motorola, Inc., 150 So. 3d 810 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...complaint and decide if it wishes to become a party to the action. If it does, then the State takes over primary responsibility for the action; but if it declines then “the person who initiated the action has the right to conduct the action.” §§ 68.083(2), (3) and (6), and 68.084(1) and (3), Fla. Stat. The State may later be permitted to intervene after initially declining to do so, but only “upon showing of good cause.” § 68.084(3), Fla....
...Without formally intervening in the cause, the Attorney General, on behalf of the State, filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action on July 18, 2013. The State asserted in its notice that it had the unilateral right to dismiss the action on authority of section 68.084(2) (a), notwithstanding any objections that Barati may have. 3 Barati thereafter moved to strike the notice of voluntary dismissal arguing inter alia that dismissal did not occur...
...8 THOMAS, J. Dissenting. I respectfully dissent. Because the Attorney General’s dismissal of this action deprived the trial court of jurisdiction, we should grant the writ of prohibition. The action here was filed in 2009. Under section 68.084(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2009), the Legislature has granted the Attorney General the sole power to dismiss a qui tam action: “The department [of Legal Affairs] may voluntarily dismiss the action notwithstanding the objections of t...
Copy

Zoltan Barati v. State of Florida, Motorola, Inc., 198 So. 3d 69 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

right to dismiss the action on authority of section 68.084(2)(a), notwithstanding any objections that
Copy

Myers v. State, 866 So. 2d 103 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 221274

...t concluded only that the settlement had not been obtained through fraud. This was error. Initially, we observe that our review standard is de novo, because this appeal involves essentially an issue regarding the correct interpretation of a statute. Section 68.084(2)(b) is modeled after 31 U.S.C. § 3730(c)(2)(B), which also requires that a proposed settlement agreement be "fair, adequate, and reasonable under all the circumstances." We have uncovered no case law in Florida construing subsection 68.084(2)(b), nor have we found federal cases interpreting the parallel provision....
...See also Officers for Justice, 688 F.2d at 625 (suggesting eight factors). Because the court below, in its order of approval, appears to have considered only that the agreement was not tainted by fraud, it did not decide whether the criteria demanded by section 68.084(2)(b) had been satisfied....
...court may, in its discretion, conduct another hearing and consider additional evidence in making such determination. [5] REVERSED and REMANDED. BARFIELD and POLSTON, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Sections 68.081-68.09, Fla. Stat. (2002). [2] Specifically, section 68.084(2)(b) provides, in part: "[N]othing in this act shall be construed to limit the authority of the department or the qui tam plaintiff to compromise a claim brought in a complaint filed under this act if the court determines, after a hea...

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.