Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 56.12 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 56.12 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 56.12

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 56
FINAL PROCESS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 56.12
56.12 Executions; levy, forthcoming bond.If a judgment debtor wants to retake possession of any property levied on, the judgment debtor may do so by executing a bond with surety to be approved by the officer in favor of the judgment creditor in a sum double the value of the property retaken as fixed by the officer holding the execution and conditioned that the property will be forthcoming on the day of sale stated in the bond.
History.s. 3, Mar. 15, 1844; RS 1192; GS 1621; RGS 2825; CGL 4512; s. 11, ch. 67-254; s. 301, ch. 95-147; s. 8, ch. 2016-33.
Note.Former s. 55.34.

F.S. 56.12 on Google Scholar

F.S. 56.12 on Casetext

Amendments to 56.12


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 56.12
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 56.12.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

SCHWARTZ, v. HSBC BANK USA, N. A., 160 F. Supp. 3d 666 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . Moore, MooRe’s Federal PRACTICE ¶ 56.12, at 56-165 (2d ed. 1995)). . . .

In CALDWELL, v. E. DeWOSKIN,, 529 B.R. 723 (E.D. Mo. 2015)

. . . Bismarck Public School Dist., 949 F.2d 1000, 1004-05 (8th Cir.1991) (citing 6 Moore’s Federal Practice § 56.12 . . .

CAPITOL RECORDS, LLC, v. ReDIGI INC., 934 F. Supp. 2d 640 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . (RD Rep. 56.12 ¶ 5, 5 ¶ 20.) . . .

WARREN PUBLISHING COMPANY v. J. SPURLOCK d b a, 645 F. Supp. 2d 402 (E.D. Pa. 2009)

. . . See 1 Nimmer on Copyright, § 5.03[D], at 5-56.12 (“[A] custom or usage whereby certain rights are reserved . . .

FARID, v. Dr. I. ELLEN, S. NYS s h a L. a P. Dr. NYS, 514 F. Supp. 2d 482 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12, at 56-165 (2d ed.1995) (quoted with approval in Ramsey v. . . .

MSF HOLDING LTD. v. FIDUCIARY TRUST COMPANY INTERNATIONAL,, 435 F. Supp. 2d 285 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 56.12, at 56-165 (2d ed.1995))), limiting its application only to situations . . .

SCHWAN- STABILO COSMETICS GMBH CO. v. PACIFICLINK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, 401 F.3d 28 (2d Cir. 2005)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12, at 56-165 (2d ed.1995)). . . .

GIBSON, v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILMINGTON, a A., 355 F.3d 215 (3d Cir. 2004)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12, at 56-165 (2d ed.1995)); Yu v. . . .

FIRST FINANCIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. ALLSTATE INTERIOR DEMOLITION CORP. HRH L. P. L. L. C., 193 F.3d 109 (2d Cir. 1999)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12, at 56-165 (2d ed.1995)). . . .

K. C. LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, v. READE MANUFACTURING, v., 33 F. Supp. 2d 835 (W.D. Mo. 1998)

. . . Dist., 949 F.2d 1000, 1004 (8th Cir.1991) (citing 6 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12, at p. 56-162 & . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. ALLENDALE NURSING CENTRE d b a CCG, 996 F. Supp. 712 (W.D. Mich. 1998)

. . . APCOM, Inc., 782 F.Supp. 389, 394-95 (N.D.Ill.1992); 6 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 56.12). . . .

RABIN, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, M., 980 F. Supp. 116 (E.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12, at 56-165 (2d ed.1995); see also Ruotolo v. . . .

K. FABRIC, M. D. K. M. D. P. A. a v. PROVIDENT LIFE ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 115 F.3d 908 (11th Cir. 1997)

. . . Moore et ah, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12; see also 10 Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. . . .

WALL, a WALL, v. MATTITUCK- CUTCHOGUE SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 945 F. Supp. 501 (E.D.N.Y. 1996)

. . . Moore, Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 56.12, at 56-165 (2d ed. 1995)). . . . .

F. RAMSEY, v. A. COUGHLIN, III, R. J., 94 F.3d 71 (2d Cir. 1996)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12, at 56-165 (2d ed.1995). . . .

HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, v. WAYCROSSE, INC. a, 990 F. Supp. 720 (D. Minn. 1996)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 & Supp. (1996) (citing cases for same). . . .

In A. BILZERIAN, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. A. BILZERIAN,, 196 B.R. 907 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1996)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 56.12 (2d ed.1991). . . .

AMERICAN FLINT GLASS WORKERS UNION, AFL- CIO J. v. BEAUMONT GLASS COMPANY, 62 F.3d 574 (3d Cir. 1995)

. . . for [the] adversary if it is clear that the case warrants that result.’ 6 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 . . .

UNDERWRITERS AT INTEREST, WAO WAO v. SCI STEELCON, a, 905 F. Supp. 441 (W.D. Mich. 1995)

. . . APCOM, Inc., 782 F.Supp. 389, 394-95 (N.D.Ill.1992); see generally 6 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 56.12 . . .

UNITED STATES v. H. LUCERO L., 895 F. Supp. 1421 (D. Kan. 1995)

. . . See, e.g., Pattern Instructions for Kansas (Criminal) 56.12 (listing elements of assault under Kansas . . .

In McTYRE GRADING PIPE, INC. D. ELLENBERG, As v. J. M. TULL METAL IRS, 180 B.R. 308 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1995)

. . . Sumner Financial Corp., 376 F.Supp. 772 (M.D.Fla.1974); 6 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12. . . .

In MANDRAYAR, 174 B.R. 289 (Bankr. S.D. Cal. 1994)

. . . At the time, the debtors' monthly income consisted of $4,015.52 from their business and $56.12 from an . . .

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. BRANTLEY,, 867 F. Supp. 1004 (M.D. Ala. 1994)

. . . Pollack, 650 F.2d at 810 (quoting MOORE’S FEDERAL PRACTICE paragraph 56.12). III. . . .

In U. SNYDER, N. P. DEOUDES, INC. Co. W. Co. Co. v. U. SNYDER,, 171 B.R. 532 (Bankr. D. Md. 1994)

. . . Wicker, Moore’s Federal Practice 56.12 (2d ed. 1994). . . .

PIERSON SAND GRAVEL, INC. a v. PIERSON TOWNSHIP, a a a a a a BASF a PIERSON TOWNSHIP, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, BASF CORPORATION, v. CHEMETRON INVESTMENTS, INC. BASF CORPORATION, v. CHEMETRON CORPORATION, a a a, 851 F. Supp. 850 (W.D. Mich. 1994)

. . . See 6 Moore's Federal Practice, 2nd ed., ¶ 56.12. . . .

QUADE, s v. L. ANDERSON E., 829 F. Supp. 220 (W.D. Mich. 1993)

. . . See 6 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 and cases cited therein. . . .

In LEASE- A- FLEET, INC. LEASE- A- FLEET, INC. v. UNIVERSITY CADILLAC, INC. N. A., 152 B.R. 431 (E.D. Pa. 1993)

. . . MOORE, FEDERAL PRACTICE, 11 56.12, at 56-162 to 56-165 & n. 5 (2d ed. 1993). 3. . . .

In CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, E. O NEILL, v. CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC., 981 F.2d 1450 (5th Cir. 1993)

. . . Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 56.12 at 161-65 (2d ed. 1991); Jensen v. . . .

In CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, E. O NEILL, v. CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC., 981 F.2d 1450 (5th Cir. 1993)

. . . Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice, 11 56.12 at 161-65 (2d ed. 1991); Jensen v. . . .

C. BUCKLEY, v. ILLINOIS JUDICIAL INQUIRY BOARD, C. D. L. E. F. A. O K. F. L. YOUNG, v. BANDY, P. T. Jr. M. C. R. C. D. L. E. F. A. O K. F., 801 F. Supp. 83 (N.D. Ill. 1992)

. . . See 6 Moore’s Federal Practice If 56.12 (1992). . . .

WESCH, v. HUNT,, 785 F. Supp. 1491 (S.D. Ala. 1992)

. . . 0 Water block 199F 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199G 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 1 294 165 129 100.00% 56.12% . . .

DAYTON ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING CO. v. APCOM, INC. Co., 782 F. Supp. 389 (N.D. Ill. 1992)

. . . _district courts can definitely grant summary judgment sua sponte”); 6 Moore’s Federal Practice, 1Í 56.12 . . .

JOHNSON, v. BISMARCK PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 949 F.2d 1000 (8th Cir. 1991)

. . . See 6 Moore’s Federal Practice H 56.12, at p. 56-162 & n. 5 (1991). . . .

TRUSTEES OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTSMEN LOCAL NO. HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST, v. REYNOLDS ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING CO. INC., 747 F. Supp. 606 (D. Nev. 1990)

. . . summary judgment for the non-moving party if the non-movant is so entitled. 6 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 56.12 . . .

In VITREOUS STEEL PRODUCTS COMPANY, M. MILLER,, 911 F.2d 1223 (7th Cir. 1990)

. . . Wicker, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 (2d ed. 1988). . . .

In VITREOUS STEEL PRODUCTS COMPANY, M. MILLER,, 911 F.2d 1223 (7th Cir. 1990)

. . . Wicker, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 (2d ed. 1988). . . .

In D. GLEN, H. IHA, v. D. GLEN,, 115 B.R. 837 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1990)

. . . MOORE, FEDERAL PRACTICE, ¶ 56.12, at 56-161 to 56-165 (2d ed. 1990). . . .

UPJOHN COMPANY v. AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, 768 F. Supp. 1186 (W.D. Mich. 1990)

. . . See generally 6 Moore’s Federal Practice § 56.12. . . .

BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, v. OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT, NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, v. OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT, 888 F.2d 1228 (8th Cir. 1989)

. . . Platte Valley Livestock, 597 F.Supp. 1055, 1060 (D.Neb.1984); 6 Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 (2d . . .

In SAINT JOSEPH S HOSPITAL, SAINT JOSEPH S HOSPITAL v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, F. Jr. M. S. D., 103 B.R. 643 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1989)

. . . MOORE, FEDERAL PRACTICE, ¶ 56.12, at 56-161 to 56-165 (2d ed. 1988). . . .

HOLT, v. R. BOWEN, M. D., 712 F. Supp. 813 (D. Colo. 1989)

. . . and Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil 2d § 2720, at 29-30; 6 Moore’s Federal Practice 2d, ¶ 56.12 . . .

I. A. M. NATIONAL PENSION FUND, PLAN A, A BENEFITS, v. SLYMAN INDUSTRIES, INC., 704 F. Supp. 301 (D.D.C. 1989)

. . . The Order granted interest at a daily rate of $56.12, accruing from the date of judgment. . . . August 23, 1988, is hereby vacated insofar as it awards post-judgment interest at a daily rate of $56.12 . . .

CARADOR, v. SANA TRAVEL SERVICE, LTD., 700 F. Supp. 787 (S.D.N.Y. 1988)

. . . U.S. 928, 90 S.Ct. 2245, 26 L.Ed.2d 796 (1970). 6 Moore, Taggart, Wicker, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 . . .

EYDE BROTHERS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF UNITED STATES, a, 697 F. Supp. 1431 (W.D. Mich. 1988)

. . . See 6 Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 (2d ed.) . . .

HORN v. CITY OF CHICAGO M., 860 F.2d 700 (7th Cir. 1988)

. . . Wicker, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12; 5 C. Wright and A. . . .

In C. PETERS d b a M. C. S. J. GROVES SONS COMPANY, v. C. PETERS, d b a M. C., 90 B.R. 588 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. 1988)

. . . . ¶¶ 56.02[4], 56.12 (2d ed. 1987). I. . . . Id. at ¶ 56.12 at 56-331 (quoting its own first edition), 56-332 n. 6 (cases cited). Cf. . . .

SUPERIOR ENGINEERING AND ELECTRONICS COMPANY, INC. v. C. SANDERS, As R. B., 833 F.2d 823 (9th Cir. 1987)

. . . Wicker, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 (2d ed. 1987). . . .

PURO INTERNATIONAL OF NEW JERSEY CORP. v. CALIFORNIA UNION INSURANCE CO. CALIFORNIA UNION INSURANCE CO. v. T T REALTY CO. INC. GENATT ASSOCIATES, INC. v. T T REALTY CO. INC., 672 F. Supp. 129 (S.D.N.Y. 1987)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 56.12 at 34 (2d ed. 1986). . . .

ARTWAY, v. SCHEIDEMANTEL,, 671 F. Supp. 330 (D.N.J. 1987)

. . . summary judgment against the moving party, even if her opponent has not moved. 6 Moore’s Fed.Prac., para. 56.12 . . .

In DAVID S UNIQUE EATERY, a Co- B. COLLINS, s a Co- v. PUB DENNIS OF HADLEY, INC. N., 82 B.R. 652 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1987)

. . . Wicker, Moore’s Federal Practice § 56.12 (ed. 1987). . . .

In CASE, E. SWISHER, v. CASE,, 75 B.R. 492 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1987)

. . . See 6 Moore’s Federal Practice para. 56.12, p. 56-331 (2d ed. 1987) (“If either the proponent of the . . .

DIAL CORPORATION, a v. MANGHNANI INVESTMENT CORP. a, 659 F. Supp. 1230 (D. Conn. 1987)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice IMI 56.13 and 56.12 (1986), one who does so still must sustain a dual prong burden . . .

In L. SCHILTZ, D. FITZPATRICK, Jr. v. L. SCHILTZ,, 97 B.R. 671 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1986)

. . . Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 2720, at 28-30 (2d ed. 1983); 6 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 56.12 . . .

WEBER J. v. DELL, R. P., 804 F.2d 796 (2d Cir. 1986)

. . . Occidental Petroleum Corp., 411 U.S. 582, 93 S.Ct. 1736, 36 L.Ed.2d 503 (1973); 6 Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 . . .

In CLARK CLARK v. UNITED STATES, 64 B.R. 437 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1986)

. . . Texas, 603 F.Supp. 110 (W.D.Pa.1984), and Volume VI more Federal Practice Second Edition Paragraph 56.12 . . .

In LEONARD, Jr. NATIONAL PERMANENT BANK, F. S. B. v. LEONARD, Jr., 63 B.R. 261 (Bankr. D.D.C. 1986)

. . . See 6 Moore’s Federal Practice, 11 56.12. . . .

In JOHNS- MANVILLE CORPORATION, MANVILLE CORPORATION, v. EQUITY SECURITY HOLDERS COMMITTEE,, 60 B.R. 842 (S.D.N.Y. 1986)

. . . Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure ¶ 56.12 at 56-331 (2d ed. 1985) (A court may grant summary judgment . . .

S. CLARK, v. UNITED STATES, 630 F. Supp. 101 (D. Md. 1986)

. . . for his adversary if it is clear that the case warrants that result.” 6 Moore’s Federal Practice II 56.12 . . .

LEE BEVERAGE COMPANY, INC. a v. I. S. C. WINES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. a a, 623 F. Supp. 867 (E.D. Wis. 1985)

. . . Practice, ¶ 56.12, p. 56-331-339 (2d Ed.1982). . . .

In NIELSEN, SCHRIMSHER, v. NIELSEN, In A. ROBSON, SCHRIMSHER, v. A. ROBSON,, 53 B.R. 289 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 1985)

. . . .2d 1335 (5th Cir.1980) (construing the prior statute — see note 4). . 6 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 . . .

S. D. SHIPLEY, v. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF DELAWARE B. P., 619 F. Supp. 421 (D. Del. 1985)

. . . Wicker, Moore’s Federal Practice 1f 56.12 (2d ed. 1982). . . .

SIDERIUS, INC. v. M. V. IDA PRIMA, v. NEWSER NAVIGATION, S. A. A S, 613 F. Supp. 916 (S.D.N.Y. 1985)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice, 11 56.12 at 331-32 (2d ed. 1985) and cases cited therein. . . .

In ZERODEC MEGACORP, INC. ZERODEC MEGACORP, INC. v. TERSTEP OF TEXAS, INC, 60 B.R. 884 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1985)

. . . Wicker, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 (2nd ed. 1981) (and authorities cited therein). . . .

UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. GREEN COUNTY, WISCONSIN,, 618 F. Supp. 91 (W.D. Wis. 1985)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 (2d ed. 1976). . . .

LITTON INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS, INC. v. SOLID STATE SYSTEMS CORP., 755 F.2d 158 (Fed. Cir. 1985)

. . . Wicker, Moore’s Federal Practice § 56.12 (2d ed. 1984); 6 Part 2 J. Moore & J. . . .

In GOVERNOR S ISLAND, a GOVERNOR S ISLAND, a v. M. EWAYS,, 45 B.R. 247 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 1984)

. . . and the non-movant is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. 6 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 . . .

ACLI INTERNATIONAL COMMODITY SERVICES, INC. A. C. v. BANQUE POPULAIRE SUISSE, S. A., 609 F. Supp. 434 (S.D.N.Y. 1984)

. . . Wicker, Moore’s Federal Practice 56.12 at 56-334 (2d ed. 1983); Commission on Independent Colleges and . . .

ROWSE v. PLATTE VALLEY LIVESTOCK, INC. a, 597 F. Supp. 1055 (D. Neb. 1984)

. . . Rule 54(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 6 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 (2d ed. 1983). . . .

v., 83 T.C. 302 (T.C. 1984)

. . . Wicker, Moore’s Federal Practice, par. 56.12 (2d ed. 1983); 10A C. Wright, A. Miller & M. . . .

SELLERSBURG STONE COMPANY, v. FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION, MSHA, 736 F.2d 1147 (7th Cir. 1984)

. . . . §§ 56.10, 56.12. . . . serious” and posed a “grave risk ’ to employees, and he found that the violations of sections 56.10 and 56.12 . . .

DANIEL B. G. v. O BANNON,, 588 F. Supp. 1095 (E.D. Pa. 1984)

. . . Education, 306 F.Supp. 1345 (E.D.Pa.1969) aff'd 432 F.2d 1358 (3d Cir.1970); 6 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 . . .

WHITFIELD, v. FINN, R., 731 F.2d 1506 (11th Cir. 1984)

. . . Connett, 685 F.2d 309, 311 (9th Cir.1982); Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12; Wright, Miller & . . .

NEBRASKA HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION, INC. v. DUNNING,, 575 F. Supp. 176 (D. Neb. 1983)

. . . As pointed out in 6 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12, 56-331 to 56-334, where one party has invoked the . . .

PROJECT RELEASE, v. PREVOST,, 722 F.2d 960 (2d Cir. 1983)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 (2d ed. 1971 & Supp.1982-83). . . .

W. DeLAIGLE B. v. FEDERAL LAND BANK OF COLUMBIA M. Jr., 568 F. Supp. 1432 (S.D. Ga. 1983)

. . . moved for summary judgment or the provisions of Rule 12 are not satisfied. 6 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 . . .

LIBERTY NATIONAL BANK, v. AETNA LIFE CASUALTY COMPANY,, 568 F. Supp. 860 (D.N.J. 1983)

. . . F.Supp. 1345 (E.D.Pa.1969), aff’d per curiam, 432 F.2d 1358 (3d Cir.1970); 6 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 . . . F.Supp. 1345 (E.D.Pa.1969), aff'd per curiam, 432 F.2d 1358 (3d Cir.1970); 6 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 . . .

CENTER FOR AUTO SAFETY, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 576 F. Supp. 739 (D.D.C. 1983)

. . . See generally 6 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 (1982). . . . .

VIGER, v. COMMERCIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY,, 707 F.2d 769 (3d Cir. 1983)

. . . See 6 Moore’s Federal Practice H 56.12 (2d ed. 1982); Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. . . .

SADIQQ, a k a v. BRAMLETT, 559 F. Supp. 362 (N.D. Ga. 1983)

. . . that the plaintiff is in fact entitled to recover as a matter of law. 6 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 . . .

OIL, CHEMICAL ATOMIC WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL v. SHELL OIL COMPANY,, 555 F. Supp. 142 (S.D. Tex. 1982)

. . . Wicker, Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 (2d ed. 1982). ' An Interoffice Memorandum from the General . . .

SELECTED RISKS INSURANCE COMPANY, v. V. BRUNO C. Jr., 555 F. Supp. 590 (M.D. Pa. 1982)

. . . See generally 6 Moore’s, Federal Practice, ¶ 56.12 (2d ed.1976); 10 C. Wright & A. . . .

INNER CITY BROADCASTING CORP. v. CARDENAS,, 554 F. Supp. 42 (D.D.C. 1982)

. . . Sarolea, 269 F.Supp. 4, 7 (D.D.C.1967); see 6 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 (2d ed.1976). . . . .

In GREENHILL DBA R. F., 27 B.R. 197 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1982)

. . . summary judgment, the Court is drawn to the following language found in 6 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 . . .

INVICTUS RECORDS, INC. a a a v. AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC. a ABC a ABC a ABC a ABC a GRT a I. C. a M. a M. a H. A. P. C. a A. P. C. a H. d b a LDR a a, 98 F.R.D. 419 (E.D. Mich. 1982)

. . . Continental Grain Co., 563 F.2d 563, 565 (2nd Cir.1977); 6 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 56.12. . . .

COOL FUEL, INCORPORATED, v. H. CONNETT,, 685 F.2d 309 (9th Cir. 1982)

. . . International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 587 F.2d 1379 (9th Cir. 1978); 6 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 56.12 . . .

KEH TONG CHEN, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF UNITED STATES,, 546 F. Supp. 1060 (D.D.C. 1982)

. . . not a prerequisite to the entry of a judgment for the non-moving party. 6 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 . . .

STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA v. UNITED STATES, 685 F.2d 1337 (Ct. Cl. 1982)

. . . Wicker, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 (2d ed. 1982); cf. Greenway v. . . .

STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA v. THE UNITED STATES, 231 Ct. Cl. 112 (Ct. Cl. 1982)

. . . Wicker, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 (2d ed. 1982); cf. Greenway v. United States, 163 Ct. . . .

PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION, v. FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION MSHA AFL- CIO,, 681 F.2d 1189 (9th Cir. 1982)

. . . . § 56.12-16, the identical counterpart of § 55.12-16 under Part 56, Safety and Health Standards — Sand . . .

KEALEY PHARMACY HOME CARE SERVICE, INC. d b a d b a a S. d b a d b a d b a s s, d b a s D W d b a v. WALGREEN COMPANY, COLLINS DRUGS, INC. a v. WALGREEN CO., 539 F. Supp. 1357 (E.D. Wis. 1982)

. . . and if the non-movants are entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. 6 Moore’s Fed.Practice, ¶ 56.12 . . .

COMMISSION ON INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, D. C. J. J. C. v. NEW YORK TEMPORARY STATE COMMISSION ON REGULATION OF LOBBYING, J. L. S. M. C., 534 F. Supp. 489 (N.D.N.Y. 1982)

. . . material fact, the Court may grant judgment for the non-moving party. 6 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 56.12 . . .

SECURITIES ADMINISTRATOR, v. COLLEGE ASSISTANCE PLAN GUAM INCORPORATED, A. Jr., 533 F. Supp. 118 (D. Guam 1981)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice § 56.12 at 56-335 — 56-338 (1976); Note, Granting Summary Judgment to a Non-Moving . . .

In ORIENTAL REALTY CORP. d b a LOCAL ASSOCIATED HOTEL, HOSPITAL, NURSING HOME AND ALLIED SERVICES UNION, SEIU, AFL- CIO,, 523 F. Supp. 441 (E.D.N.Y. 1981)

. . . Curran, 423 F.2d 393 (2d Cir. 1970); 6 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 56.12 (2d ed. 1980). . . .

J. A. POLLOCK M. v. BIRMINGHAM TRUST NATIONAL BANK,, 650 F.2d 807 (5th Cir. 1981)

. . . for his adversary if it is clear that the case warrants that result. 6 Moore’s Federal Practice, H 56.12 . . .

BANCO DE VIZCAYA, S. A. a v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, a, 514 F. Supp. 1280 (N.D. Ill. 1981)

. . . for his adversary if it is clear that the case warrants that result. 6 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 56.12 . . .

MATALA, v. CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, MATALA, v. MARSHALL,, 647 F.2d 427 (4th Cir. 1981)

. . . /Day 12/6/76 to 1/31/77 63.08 55.00 8.08 2/1/77 to 4/30/77 63.40 55.32 8.08 5/1/77 to 7/31/77 64.20 56.12 . . .

KENNEDY, v. H. WHITEHURST,, 509 F. Supp. 226 (D.D.C. 1981)

. . . See 6 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.12 (cases cited at n.6). III. CONCLUSION. . . .

In EASTERN FREIGHT WAYS, INC. B. GLUCK, v. SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY, J., 9 B.R. 653 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1981)

. . . See 6 Moore’s Federal Practice, (2d ed. 1976) ¶ 56.12. . . .

In J. A. G. INC. FRAMINGHAM WINERY, INC. v. J. A. G. INC., 7 B.R. 624 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1980)

. . . Lynn, 388 F.Supp. 493 at 498 (D.Mass. 1974); See also: 6 Moore’s Federal Practice, Par. 56.12. . . .