Cases from cite.case.law:

WOODSON ELECTRIC SOLUTIONS, INC. v. PORT ROYAL PROPERTY, LLC,, 271 So. 3d 111 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . a non-final order denying their motion to dismiss and/or transfer for improper venue under section 47.011 . . . Miami-Dade County to Collier County ("motion to dismiss"), asserting that venue is improper under section 47.011 . . . Section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2018), provides: "Actions shall be brought only in the county where . . . the trial court's order denying the Defendants' motion to dismiss for improper venue under section 47.011 . . . money damages, there is no 'property in litigation' for the purpose of the third clause of section 47.011 . . .

KNAPP, v. KNAPP,, 266 So. 3d 224 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . . § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2019). . . . McGee , 145 So.3d 955, 957 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) ; §§ 47.011, 47.122 & 61.13(2)(d), Fla. . . .

FIRST CHURCH OF NAZARENE OF GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA, INC. v. SITE CONCEPTS, INC., 265 So. 3d 641 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . See § 47.011, Fla. . . .

ROBINSON, v. K. ROBINSON,, 248 So. 3d 174 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Venue was proper in Duval County because both parties reside there, see § 47.011, Fla. . . .

GARDNER, v. STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, 231 So. 3d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Florida Statutes (2016), governs the determination of proper venue, which is generally found in section 47.011 . . . However, in Grad we also noted that “[o]f the several venue selections authorized by either section 47.011 . . .

DYAL, v. DYAL,, 223 So. 3d 470 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2016), explains where an action may be brought: “Actions shall be brought . . . Johns County, based upon section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2016). . . .

GREEN, v. IVEY,, 220 So. 3d 475 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . .” § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2015). . . .

A. POWERS Jr. LLC, v. MELICK,, 211 So. 3d 122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . clarification, the trial court also ruled that venue was proper in Palm Beach County pursuant to sections 47.011 . . . It also erred insofar as it looked to the general provisions of section 47.011, Florida Statutes, on . . .

NUNEZ- MILLER, v. MILLER,, 209 So. 3d 619 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2015) applies to actions to establish a foreign divorce decree as a . . . defendant resides, where the cause of action accrued, or where the property in litigation is located.” § 47.011 . . . .2d 142, 143 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) (“[W]hen a complaint to establish a foreign decree is brought, F.S. 47.011 . . . action to establish foreign divorce decree as Florida judgment, the only venue alternative under section 47.011 . . .

HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. SMITH LLP D., 203 So. 3d 1013 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . When a party seeks to transfer or dismiss for improper venue under section 47.011, Florida Statutes ( . . . Section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2015) provides that a civil action “shall be .brought only in the county . . .

ALUIA, v. DYCK- O NEAL, INC., 205 So. 3d 768 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Florida’s general venue provision, section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2014), provides that “[ajctions . . .

CORIO, v. LOPEZ,, 190 So. 3d 1152 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Co-rio’s lawsuit, Lopez filed a motion to change venue pursuant to the general venue statute, section 47.011 . . .

AHG TAX CREDIT FUND XVIII, LLC, v. BLITCHTON STATION, LTD., 200 So. 3d 117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . they argued that Alachua County was the only proper venue for that action under sections 47.061 and 47.011 . . .

VINSAND, v. VINSAND,, 179 So. 3d 366 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . For purposes- of venue, section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2012), mandates that “[ajctions shall be brought . . . dissolution of marriage' is personal or transitory, the ‘property:in litigation’ clause of section 47.011 . . .

M. HALL, v. ANIMALS. COM, L. L. C., 171 So. 3d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . . §§ 47.011, 47.051, Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .

C. KING AKCA, v. RABORG, Jr., 165 So. 3d 764 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . .” § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2014). . . . See § 47.011, Fla. . . .

ILD CORP. f k a ILD v. NEW LINK NETWORK, LLC,, 157 So. 3d 501 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . County and asserted there was no proper statutory basis for venue in Pinellas County under section 47.011 . . . place of payment venue rule,” that rule deals with the issue of whether venue is proper under section 47.011 . . . or erred in denying ILD’s motion based on a factor that is applicable to an analysis under section 47.011 . . .

McGEE, v. McGEE,, 145 So. 3d 955 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . . § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .

R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO. USA v. MOONEY,, 147 So. 3d 42 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See §§ 47.011, 47.021, 47.051, Fla. . . .

PATTERSON, v. TEAGUE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., 135 So. 3d 573 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Instead, Patterson argued that under section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2012), venue is proper in Polk . . . Section 47.011 provides, in pertinent part, “Actions shall be brought only in the county where the defendant . . .

GINO VITIELLO, M. D. P. A. v. GENOVESE JOBLOVE BATTISTA, P. A., 123 So. 3d 1185 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . . §§ 47.011 & 47.051, Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .

METNICK LEVY, P. A. v. SEULING J. P. C., 123 So. 3d 639 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Where a defendant is a Florida resident, section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2012), dictates that a cause . . . However, section 47.011’s mandate does not apply to nonresidents. See id. . . .

J. ABOUL- HOSN, v. FROST VAN DEN BOOM SMITH, P. A., 117 So. 3d 445 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See § 47.011, Fla. . . .

MANN, Sr. v. A. YEATTS,, 111 So. 3d 934 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . a motion to transfer venue based on the impropriety of the plaintiffs venue selection under section 47.011 . . .

SUNCOAST HOME IMPROVEMENTS, INC. v. ROBICHAUD, 106 So. 3d 969 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . .” § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

AMERICAN K- DETECTION SERVICES, INC. v. CICERO,, 100 So. 3d 236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 47.011, Fla. . . .

BEDWELL, A. H. S. F. O J. J. B. I. v. E. RUCKS, R. Co- E. D. Co- E. L. L. P., 127 So. 3d 533 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . .” § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

M. FRYM, v. FLAGSHIP COMMUNITY BANK R. III IV a N. A., 96 So. 3d 452 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . In the petition, Frym claims that pursuant to section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2006), actions involving . . .

G. PROCACCI, v. P. HARLLEE IV A. A., 95 So. 3d 997 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . .” § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . . resident of Collier County, Florida, which is thus an appropriate venue selection pursuant to section 47.011 . . .

E. KIST, v. O. HUBBARD,, 93 So. 3d 1100 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2009), provides that “[a]ctions shall be brought only in the county . . .

WILNER HARTLEY METCALF, P. A. P. A. S. v. HOWARD ASSOCIATES, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, P. A. A., 89 So. 3d 1138 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .

E. BROWN v. J. NAGELHOUT, Co. a CSX a, 126 So. 3d 1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Based on the Supreme Court’s holding in Brown, applying the plain language of sections 47.011, 47.021 . . .

BROWN, v. J. NAGELHOUT,, 84 So. 3d 304 (Fla. 2012)

. . . Section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2011), provides that “[ajctions shall be brought only in the county . . . a motion to transfer venue based on the impropriety of the plaintiffs venue selection under section 47.011 . . . reviewing a plaintiffs venue selection, the Florida courts should apply the plain language of sections 47.011 . . .

STATE v. A. KOTECKI,, 82 So. 3d 1150 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See §§ 47.011, .021, .051-061; see also § 47.122 (“For the convenience of the parties or witnesses or . . .

FLORIDA GAMCO, INC. v. FONTAINE, a, 68 So. 3d 923 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2010), provides in pertinent part that “[a]ctions shall be brought . . . Venue is proper where the defendants reside. § 47.011. . . .

RESIDENTIAL SAVINGS MORTAGE, INC. a v. KEESLING a, 73 So. 3d 280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . to determine whether a tort action accrued in Pinellas County for purposes of venue under sections 47.011 . . .

M. DRUCKER, P. A. a k a M. P. A. P. L. v. DUVALL,, 61 So. 3d 468 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Pursuant to section 47.011, Florida Statutes, venue is proper “only in the county where the defendant . . .

RJG ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. a v. STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY,, 62 So. 3d 678 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2009). State Farm moved to transfer venue to Palm Beach County. . . . See §§ 47.011, .051. . . . Although RJG did not base its venue selection on State Farm’s presence in Manatee County, see §§ 47.011 . . .

PILL, L. Jr. R. L. v. MERCO GROUP OF PALM BEACHES, INC. a a F. Jr. J., 56 So. 3d 890 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2010), states in relevant part that “[a]c-tions shall be brought only . . . 8 So.3d 1227, 1228 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (“[T]he joint residency rule is not an exception to section 47.011 . . . residing in different counties may be brought in any county in which any defendant resides.”). .Now § 47.011 . . .

HUDSON PROTECTION GROUP, INC. v. PCG SECURITY INT L LLC,, 54 So. 3d 593 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . At hearing, the trial court determined that the motion was brought under section 47.011, Florida Statutes . . . defendant resides, where the cause of action accrued, or where the property in litigation is located. § 47.011 . . .

M. MOSCOWITZ, III, v. D. OLDHAM, III, 48 So. 3d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Venue is governed by section 47.011 of the Florida Statutes (2008), which states that actions can be . . .

WEIMORTS, v. SHOCKLEY,, 47 So. 3d 386 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . special venue provision, the trial court was required to apply the general venue provision in section 47.011 . . . Under section 47.011, “[a]ctions shall be brought only in the county where the defendant resides, where . . . However, these instructions cannot contradict section 47.011. . . .

MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, a v. JACKSON, My, 46 So. 3d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . . § 47.011, Fla. Stat. . . .

HACIENDA VILLAS, INC. v. MIA CONSULTING GROUP, INC., 47 So. 3d 848 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Under section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2009), “Actions shall be brought only in the county where the . . . rule does not apply- The next question is where the cause of action accrued for purposes of section 47.011 . . .

SHAHNASARIAN, v. D. TEJEDOR, 41 So. 3d 348 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Pursuant to section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2008), actions against an individual shall be brought only . . .

McDANIEL RESERVE REALTY HOLDINGS, LLC, v. B. S. E. CONSULTANTS, INC. a M. D., 39 So. 3d 504 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . or transfer for improper venue, arguing that Palm Beach County was an improper venue under section 47.011 . . . a motion to transfer venue based on the impropriety of the plaintiffs venue selection under section 47.011 . . . Thus, we review that legal determination de novo.- Section 47.011, Florida Statutes, the general venue . . . money damages, there is no “property in litigation” for the purpose of the third clause of section 47.011 . . .

E. BROWN v. J. NAGELHOUT, Co. a CSX a, 33 So. 3d 83 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2009), provides that “[ajctions shall be brought only in the county . . .

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, v. MIDDLETON, E., 24 So. 3d 624 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . .” § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

ROCCO, H. v. GLENN, RASMUSSEN, FOGARTY HOOKER, P. A. J., 32 So. 3d 111 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2008), provides that a cause of action “shall be brought only in the . . .

CARDELLES, v. CATHOLIC HEALTH SERVICES, INC. a k a a k a St. s d b a St. s M. D., 14 So. 3d 1025 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

X. McCARROLL, v. VAN DYK, d b a, 8 So. 3d 1256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . §§ 47.011, 47.051, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . . has instructed that non-resident defendants, like McCarroll, are removed from the scope of section 47.011 . . .

HEARTLAND ORGANICS, INC. a a v. MC DEVELOPMENTS, LLC, a a LLC, a L., 8 So. 3d 1227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . However, the joint residency rule is not an exception to section 47.011, Florida Statutes, the general . . .

STRATUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT, INC., 994 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See §§ 47.051, 47.011, Fla. Stat.; Knowles, Inc. v. . . .

FLORIDA DIVISION OF PARI- MUTUEL WAGERING OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, J. v. FLORIDA STANDARDBRED BREEDERS OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. a, 983 So. 2d 61 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . §§ 47.011, 47.122, Fla. Stat. (2006); Smith v. . . .

In DOE B, 973 So. 2d 627 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2007), the general venue statute, provides that a legal action may . . .

J. TOBIN, v. A F ENGINEERING, a, 979 So. 2d 967 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . individual defendants (Forkey, Sorena, and Shahak) reside in Palm Beach County, not Miami-Dade County, see § 47.011 . . . action, including the conversion claim, accrued in Palm Beach County, not Miami-Dade County, see §§ 47.011 . . . County”); and the property in litigation is located in Palm Beach County, not Miami-Dade County, see §§ 47.011 . . . Section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2006), provides, in part: "Where actions may be begun. — Actions shall . . .

KOPECKY, v. KOPECKA,, 967 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . “It is well-established that venue [for the purposes of applying the venue statute, section 47.011, Florida . . . Section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2007), provides: “Actions shall be brought only in the county where . . . This section shall not apply to actions against nonresidents.” § 47.011, Fla. . . . Section 47.011 does not apply to this case because the wife is a nonresident. . . .

J. OLDOCK A. v. DL B ENTERPRISES, INC., 966 So. 2d 484 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . DL & B filed a Motion to Dismiss and Transfer based on section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2005), which . . .

SAUNDERS, III, v. A BETTER BLIND, INC., 954 So. 2d 755 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . See § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2006); Lane v. . . .

BUSH, v. STATE, 945 So. 2d 1207 (Fla. 2006)

. . . .” § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . . And finally, to the extent that language in section 47.011 reasonably may be read as being consistent . . . Thus, under both section 47.011 and the home venue privilege, the circuit court in Leon County is the . . .

PENTON, v. INTERCREDIT BANK, N. A., 943 So. 2d 863 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Section 47.011, Florida Statutes, provides that actions shall be brought only in the county where the . . .

C. MEDBERRY, v. C O McCALLISTER,, 937 So. 2d 808 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . The court concluded that pursuant to section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2003), venue in Leon County is . . .

WEINBERG, v. WEINBERG, 936 So. 2d 707 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Section 47.011, Florida Statutes, the general venue statute, provides as follows: “Actions shall be brought . . .

BLACKHAWK QUARRY COMPANY OF FLORIDA, INC. v. HEWITT CONTRACTING CO. INC., 931 So. 2d 197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Venue is governed by section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2004), which provides, in pertinent part, that . . .

Z. BRODIE P. v. FOLEY LARDNER, a, 932 So. 2d 440 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See §§ 47.011, 47.021, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

Jo PEREZ, v. FERRELL AMEX, 932 So. 2d 388 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2005), allows actions to be brought “in the county where the defendant . . . Ferrell argues that section 47.011 allows her to select Hillsborough County because that is where the . . . However, section 47.011 refers to only an individual defendant and a single cause of action. . . . (renumbering § 46.01 as § 47.011 and § 46.02 as § 47.021). . . .

J. GATTON E. a v. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK OF FLORIDA,, 923 So. 2d 1260 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See §§ 47.011, .051, Fla. Stat. (2004); Carter v. Fleming, 567 So.2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). . . .

JOHN HALL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTING, INC. M. v. ALLSTATE CONSTRUCTION, INC., 917 So. 2d 310 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Under section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2004), actions against individuals “shall be brought only in . . .

WORLDWIDE APPRAISAL SERVICES, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 905 So. 2d 968 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2004). . . .

PIER POINT DEVELOPERS, L. L. C. a v. R. WHITELAW,, 912 So. 2d 18 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Venue is governed by Florida Statutes section 47.011, which provides in part that “[ajctions shall be . . .

PLATT v. HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. OF DELAWARE d b a a D. M. D. M. D. ECS a ECS, a, 897 So. 2d 556 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . the motions or the written order whether the basis for the transfer was improper venue under section 47.011 . . . Thus, section 47.011 could not support a venue change. . . .

OCEAN BANK, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, Co., 902 So. 2d 833 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . County was not exclusively under the jurisdiction of the receivership court, but asserted that section 47.011 . . .

BUSH, v. STATE, 886 So. 2d 339 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2002), provides that venue in civil actions is in a county where any . . .

A. HARB, a a v. COMMERCE REALTY GROUP, INC. a II, a, 881 So. 2d 35 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . . § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2003). . . .

L. BAUMAN v. M. RAYBURN,, 878 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . . § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2003). . . .

BURGESS, v. V. CROSBY, Jr., 870 So. 2d 217 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . filed in the county where the agency is headquartered pursuant to the general venue statute, section 47.011 . . .

BLACKSTONE CALLING CARD, INC. v. PATEL,, 869 So. 2d 59 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . State Wide Recovery & Research Corp., 330 So.2d 807, 808 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); § 47.011, Fla. . . .

D. STOVALL, v. COOPER, V. Jr., 860 So. 2d 5 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2001). . . . Accordingly, the general venue statute, section 47.011, applies. . . . That section provides: 47.011 Where actions may be -begun.— Actions shall be brought only in the county . . .

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. a v. GRACI,, 849 So. 2d 1196 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Of the several venue selections authorized by either section 47.011 or section 47.051, Fla. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, STATE OF FLORIDA, v. SUN- SENTINEL, INC., 839 So. 2d 790 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See § 47.011, Fla. . . .

SYMBOL MATTRESS OF FLORIDA, INC. v. ROYAL SLEEP PRODUCTS, INC., 832 So. 2d 233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Section 47.011 of the Florida Statutes (2001) sets forth Florida’s general venue provision as follows . . . : 47.011. . . . See §§ 47.011, 47.051, Fla. Stat (2001). . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, v. CITY OF POMPANO BEACH,, 829 So. 2d 928 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . This decision is also in line with the general venue statute, section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2001) . . .

D. M. v. J. D. M, a C. F. C. F. J. D. M, D. Ad s, 814 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . He further argued that the initial venue selection was improper under section 47.011, Florida Statutes . . . D.M. contends that the general venue provision of section 47.011 should apply to these proceedings. . . .

HILL, II, v. FIELDS,, 813 So. 2d 212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . against him by Carissa Fields did not support venue in Pasco County on any basis set forth in section 47.011 . . . Section 47.011 provides that actions shall be brought only in the county where the defendant resides, . . .

C. ALLEN, a C. W. a v. C. WALKER, E. L., 810 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2001); St. Laurent v. Resort Mktg. . . . this does not change the fact that the case “accrued” in Broward County within the meaning of section 47.011 . . .

POZO, v. ROADHOUSE GRILL, INC., 790 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . reasons: 1) the primary defendant, Humana, resides in Orange County; thus venue is proper under §§ 47.011 . . . Actions brought against individual defendants shall be in the “county where the defendant resides.” § 47.011 . . .

J. HOLLIS, v. FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY,, 259 F.3d 1295 (11th Cir. 2001)

. . . . § 47.011, the state venue statute, ■ or transferred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). . . . Stat. § 47.011, the district court ruled that venue for Mr. . . . Stat. § 47.011. ." . . .

M. ASHEMIMRY, v. BA NAFA,, 778 So. 2d 495 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . The applicable venue statutes are sections 47.011 and 47.051: 47.011. . . .

J. FONTANA v. HUGO INTERNATIONAL, INC., 781 So. 2d 433 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . .” § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

L. LANE, v. HEMOPHILIA OF THE SUNSHINE STATE, INC., 793 So. 2d 992 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . (“HOSS”), did not support venue in Pinel-las County on any basis set forth in section 47.011, Florida . . . The general venue statute, section 47.011, Florida Statutes (1999), provides: “Actions shall be brought . . .

W. J. EGGERS, v. EGGERS,, 776 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . hearing that Citrus County was an improper venue for this action under the general venue statute, section 47.011 . . .

A. TULLI, v. TULLI,, 780 So. 2d 213 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Joseph Tulli stated in the affidavit that he deposited the check in his account in Duval County- Section 47.011 . . .

RUSSELL, n k a v. A. G. EDWARDS SONS, INC., 779 So. 2d 452 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

KERR CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. PETERS CONTRACTING, INC., 767 So. 2d 610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . selection clause in the subcontract is void, and venue must be determined in accordance with section 47.011 . . . Based on section 47.011, we find that venue is in Orange County, Florida. . . .

DICKINSON v. FLORIDA NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN, INC., 763 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Pursuant to section 47.011, Florida Statutes (1999), actions shall only be brought in the county where . . .

E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS, v. SIMPSON,, 763 So. 2d 427 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Pursuant to the venue statute, section 47.011, Florida Statutes (1997), Exotic Botanicals resides in . . .

MDAR v. SHAPIRO,, 756 So. 2d 266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Because section 47.011, Florida Statutes (1999) regarding venue does not apply to non-residents, and . . .

MINGIONE, v. MINGIONE,, 756 So. 2d 197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . wife’s motion to transfer venue to the county of her residence, accepting her argument that section 47.011 . . . Skinner, 678 So.2d 512 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (reversing order denying transfer in accordance with section 47.011 . . .

ZUR v. AIR ORLANDO SALES, INC., 751 So. 2d 726 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Section 47.011, Florida Statutes (1997) provides that “[a]ctions shall be brought only in the county . . . Orange County should be upheld because the airplane is “property in litigation,” as described in section 47.011 . . . There is no dispute over the right of possession of the airplane and it cannot qualify under section 47.011 . . .

DIVE BIMINI, INC. C. v. E. ROBERTS, A. A. B. E., 745 So. 2d 482 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Under section 47.011, Florida Statutes (1997), an action must be brought in the county where a defendant . . .