The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 30
SHERIFFS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 30.24

30.24 Transportation and return of prisoners.—

(1) The sheriff of any county of the state, when required to go beyond the limits of this state to bring back a prisoner charged with any offense or who has been convicted of any crime in this state and has escaped, shall receive the actual and necessary expense on account of returning the prisoner to the state. Travel under this subsection is exempt from the provisions of s. 112.061.

(2)(a) The sheriff of each county of the state is authorized to contract with private transport companies for the transportation of prisoners both within and beyond the limits of this state. Each prisoner shall be delivered to the transport company by a sheriff or other proper law enforcement official for transportation and then delivered by the same transport company to the proper sheriff or other law enforcement official upon arriving at the point of destination.

(b) Any company transporting a prisoner pursuant to this section shall be considered an independent contractor and shall be solely liable for the prisoner while the prisoner is in the custody of the company. Any transport company contracting with a sheriff for the transportation of prisoners as provided for in this section shall be insured and shall provide no less than $100,000 in liability insurance with respect to the transporting of the prisoners.

(c) Personnel employed by any transport company for the transportation of prisoners as provided for in this section are specifically exempted from:

1. Any requirements of being appointed as deputy sheriffs.

2. Providing bond.

3. Meeting requirements and training as provided by the Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission for law enforcement and correctional officers.

History.—s. 1, ch. 5407, 1905; ss. 2, 5, ch. 7886, 1919; RGS 2893; s. 2, ch. 10091, 1925; CGL 4591; s. 2, ch. 20943, 1941; s. 1, ch. 77-154; s. 1, ch. 81-176; s. 4, ch. 83-167; s. 183, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 30.24 on Google Scholar

F.S. 30.24 on Casetext

Amendments to 30.24

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 30.24

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 30.24.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, In, 366 F. Supp. 3d 256 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . 30.21 Immediate Binding Effect...364 30.22 Additional Documents...364 30.23 Reservation of Rights...364 30.24 . . . Constitution or PROMESA), and nothing herein shall be deemed a waiver of any such rights and powers. 30.24 . . .

IN RE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, In, 363 F. Supp. 3d 220 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . 30.21 Immediate Binding Effect...327 30.22 Additional Documents...327 30.23 Reservation of Rights...327 30.24 . . . Constitution or PROMESA), and nothing herein shall be deemed a waiver of any such rights and powers. 30.24 . . .

FREYRE, v. CHRONISTER, s s C., 910 F.3d 1371 (11th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 30.24(2)(b) ("independent contractors" transporting prisoners "shall be solely liable for the prisoner . . .

P. MEDINA, v. CLOVIS ONCOLOGY, INC., 215 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (D. Colo. 2017)

. . . On November 16, 2015, Clovis’ stock price fell by 70%, from $99.43 per share to $30.24 per share, wiping . . .

SECURE SOLUTIONS USA INC. a W. a k a W. v. MORROW,, 210 So. 3d 92 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . We have considered the application of section 30.24(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2012), but it does not impact . . . Section 30.24 is entitled “Transportation and return of prisoners” and provides, in pertinent part: ( . . . Section 30.24 does not waive sovereign immunity or address sovereign immunity in any manner. . . . While section 30.24(b) gives private transport companies independent contractor status, this status does . . . Likewise, section 30.24’s requirements of holding the sheriff harmless and maintaining $100,000 in liability . . .

IN RE CIVIC PARTNERS SIOUX CITY, LLC, LLC, v., 553 B.R. 355 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2016)

. . . Paragraph 30.24 of the amended lease provides: [Civic Partners’] obligations under this Lease are conditioned . . .

ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL PENSION v. CLOVIS ONCOLOGY, INC., 185 F. Supp. 3d 1172 (N.D. Cal. 2016)

. . . press release, the price of Clovis’s shares decreased to $69.19 per share and ultimately closed at $30.24 . . .

J. KIPPLE, v. UNITED STATES,, 105 Fed. Cl. 651 (Fed. Cl. 2012)

. . . . §§ 30.24, 30.33 (2007). . . .

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS v. P. BECKER, J. L. F. R. Jr. R. W. Jr. R. M. Jr. Jr. J. Jr. Jr. J. III, L. A. Jr. C. Jr. L. Jr. A. Sr., 863 F. Supp. 2d 1190 (N.D. Ga. 2012)

. . . permissions program for the digital distribution of this excerpt, Sage would have earned less than $30.24 . . . The amount earned would have been $30.24, the amount charged by Sage through its in-house program at . . .

TRADING VENTURES, LLC, LLC, v. UNITED STATES,, 101 Fed. Cl. 365 (Fed. Cl. 2011)

. . . received a partnership interest in K2 in the following amounts: Bergmann Trust, 20.74 percent; A.B.I.B., 30.24 . . .

ESTATE OF GERASIMENKO v. CAPE WIND TRADING COMPANY,, 272 F.R.D. 385 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . May 9, 2007) (discussing this distinction) (citations omitted); Moore’s Federal Practice § 30.24[1] at . . . Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 30.24[1] at 30-58 (3d ed. 2008). . . . .

M. FRIEDMAN, v. INTERVET INC. d b a,, 730 F. Supp. 2d 758 (N.D. Ohio 2010)

. . . (quoting Manual for Complex Litigation, Third § 30.24)). . . .

AHLE, v. VERACITY RESEARCH CO., 663 F. Supp. 2d 713 (D. Minn. 2009)

. . . Id., quoting Manual for Complex Litigation, Second, at § 30.24 at p. 232, citing, in turn, Kleiner v. . . .

JONES, v. JELD- WEN, INC. IG v. d b a GLASSLAM N. G. I., 250 F.R.D. 554 (S.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . Industries, Inc., 59 F.3d 764, 766 (8th Cir.1995) (quoting Manual for Complex Litigation, Second § 30.24 . . . (citing Manual for Complex Litigation, Third § 30.24 at 233 (1995)) (“Defendants ordinarily are not precluded . . .

RIDDLE, v. KEMNA,, 523 F.3d 850 (8th Cir. 2008)

. . . R. 30.24(b) (each appellate court shall send the mandate affirming a felony sentence, or dismissing its . . .

UNITED STATES v. WHITTINGTON, 269 F. App'x 388 (5th Cir. 2008)

. . . The heroin seized from Garcia weighed 30.24 grams. . . .

ROSARIO, v. AMERICAN CORRECTIVE COUNSELING SERVICES, INC. R., 506 F.3d 1039 (11th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 30.24(2)(b) with Fla. Stat. § 766.1115. . . .

VILLAGE OF GRAFTON KNG, v. RURAL LORAIN COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY,, 419 F.3d 562 (6th Cir. 2005)

. . . RLCWA’s non-bulk customers are charged $30.24 per month per 5,131 gallons. . . .

D. LOUGHIN, v. OCCIDENTAL CHEM. CORP., 234 F.R.D. 75 (E.D. Pa. 2005)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 30.24 (3d ed. 1999) (“[Ljeave to take a telephonic deposition . . .

VILLAGE OF GRAFTON, v. RURAL LORAIN COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY,, 316 F. Supp. 2d 568 (N.D. Ohio 2004)

. . . The RLCWA charges its non-bulk customers $30.24 per month per 5131 gallons Second Stip. ¶4. . . .

COBELL, v. A. NORTON,, 212 F.R.D. 14 (D.D.C. 2002)

. . . .”); Annotated Manual for Complex Litigation § 30.24, at 276 (3d ed. 2002) (“Under accepted ethical principles . . .

PARKS, v. EASTWOOD INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., 235 F. Supp. 2d 1082 (C.D. Cal. 2002)

. . . sides should be permitted to investigate the case fully”); Manual for Complex Litigation (Third) § 30.24 . . .

PAKISTAN NATIONAL SHIPPING CORPORATION, v. A CARGO OF M T OF HEAVY STEEL SCRAP, D, 159 F. Supp. 2d 942 (S.D. Tex. 2001)

. . . . § 30.24 specifically allows a carrier to file the SED four days late. . . . mandates that § 30.22’s requirement of an SED still applies in the context of a late filing under § 30.24 . . . See 15 C.F.R. § 30.24. . . .

E. BUBLITZ A. v. E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, Hi-, 196 F.R.D. 545 (S.D. Iowa 2000)

. . . Id. at 765 (quoting Manual for Complex Litigation, Second § 30.24 at 232 (1985)). . . . MCL 2d § 30.24 at 232 (citing Kleiner v. . . . See Manual for Complex Litigation, Third § 30.24 at 233 (1995) (“Defendants ordinarily are not precluded . . .

MR. J. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION,, 98 F. Supp. 2d 226 (D. Conn. 2000)

. . . Subpoena Costs Next, the Board contends that it is not liable for $30.24 in costs for subpoena service . . . testify and he fails to establish the reasonableness of the expense, the award shall be reduced by $30.24 . . .

v., 23 Ct. Int'l Trade 940 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1999)

. . . /Commex Corp. 30.24% All Others 16.66% These rates have been stipulated to and accepted by all parties . . .

GREAT RIVERS COOPERATIVE OF SOUTHEASTERN IOWA, a a v. FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC., 59 F.3d 764 (8th Cir. 1995)

. . . Manual for Complex Litigation, Second § 30.24 at 232 (1985) (“MCL 2d”). . . . MCL 2d § 30.24 at 232 (citing Kleiner v. . . .

ARCHE, INC. v. AZALEIA, U. S. A. INC., 882 F. Supp. 334 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . . §§ 30.24[2], 30.25[4], 30.27[l][b], Indeed, in this Circuit, actual confusion is a necessary prerequisite . . .

A. GEORGINE, v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. v. ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 160 F.R.D. 478 (E.D. Pa. 1995)

. . . materially false and misleading letter sent to class by defendant); Manual for Complex Litigation, Second, § 30.24 . . .

In ATLANTA SOUTHERN BUSINESS PARK, LTD., 173 B.R. 444 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1994)

. . . the Debtor proposes to satisfy NationsBank’s claim by delivering $144,886.00 in cash and conveying 30.24 . . .

MINNESOTA PET- BREEDERS, INC. v. SCHELL KAMPETER, INC. d b a, 843 F. Supp. 506 (D. Minn. 1993)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition § 30.24[1] (3d ed. 1992) [ . . .

WESCH, v. HUNT,, 785 F. Supp. 1491 (S.D. Ala. 1992)

. . . 0.00% 0 0.00% Block 121 0 0 0 0 0 Block 122 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 1 1,012 100.00% 702 69.37% 306 30.24% . . . 0 0.00% 4 0.40% 0 0.00% Total Tract 0104.03 1,012 100.00% 702 69.37% 306 30.24% 0 0.00% 4 0.40% 0 0.00% . . .

CATERPILLAR OVERSEAS, S. A. v. MARINE TRANSPORT INC. CATERPILLAR OVERSEAS, S. A. v. FARRELL LINES, INC. CATERPILLAR OVERSEAS, S. A. v. FARRELL LINES, INC., 900 F.2d 714 (4th Cir. 1990)

. . . As applied in this case, the tractor would translate into 30.24 units, which, given each unit a liability . . .

In SCHOOL ASBESTOS LITIGATION. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LANCASTER MANHEIM TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT, v. LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC, LTD. Co. U. S. U. S. Co. Co. Co. W. R. Co. Co. NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY, W. R. Co. No. SAFE BUILDINGS ALLIANCE, a No., 842 F.2d 671 (3d Cir. 1988)

. . . of “actual or threatened misconduct of a serious nature,” Manual for Complex Litigar tion, Second, § 30.24 . . . 452 U.S. at 104, 101 S.Ct. at 2202 (emphasis added); accord Manual for Complex Litigation, Second, § 30.24 . . .

ROSSINI v. OGILVY MATHER, INCORPORATED,, 798 F.2d 590 (2d Cir. 1986)

. . . Manual for Complex Litigation Second § 30.24 (1985), reprinted in 1 J. . . .

M. DIXON, v. BURMAN, 593 F. Supp. 6 (N.D. Ind. 1983)

. . . plaintiffs March 8, 1983, Exhibit III (photo copy of 1982 Nonemployment Compensation Form 1099 detailing $30.24 . . .

A. BALLEW, v. ASSOCIATES FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY OF NEBRASKA, INC. a, 450 F. Supp. 253 (D. Neb. 1976)

. . . An amount of $30.24 was assessed. . . .

X. DUFNER, v. PENN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY,, 374 F. Supp. 979 (E.D. Pa. 1974)

. . . service to or received vacation pay -from a signatory Employer in the preceding calendar month, of which $30.24 . . .

S. IMESON, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 487 F.2d 319 (9th Cir. 1973)

. . . (See, e. g., 5 Mertens, supra, §§ 30.24, 30.27, 30.28.) (3) We must also answer the third question against . . .

ROLLY MARINE SERVICE, INC. a v. SULLIVAN,, 273 So. 2d 770 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . It exactly reflected the storage dates and time of accrual and showed a tax of $30.24 and a total due . . .

ASHEVILLE TOBACCO BOARD OF TRADE, INC. a v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,, 294 F.2d 619 (4th Cir. 1961)

. . . The operator who ranked first with 30.24% of thejnarket in 1954 now ranks fourth with 18.03%. . . .

ALFRED C. BERGH, ET AL. v. THE UNITED STATES, 132 Ct. Cl. 564 (Ct. Cl. 1955)

. . . Bergh_$48.80 Joe Frank Bryson_ 30.24 James A. . . .

INLAND PUMP MFG. CO. v. UNITED STATES, 59 F.2d 261 (Ct. Cl. 1932)

. . . 30, 1925. 55.83 ..........May 16, 1925. 38.71..........June 11, 1925. 17.88 ..........July 9, 1925. 30.24 . . .

THE A. L. WALKER. THE TOMPKINSVILLE. THAMES TOWBOAT CO. v. EASTERN TRANSP. CO., 45 F.2d 621 (D. Md. 1930)

. . . October 3: Paramour Gas Buoy at 2:05 a. m., barometer 30.24; Winter Quarter Light Vessel at 8:10 a. rn . . .

Co. v., 14 B.T.A. 1321 (B.T.A. 1929)

. . . Turn-bull held the second largest amount of stock, having 30.24 per cent, and Harris held the smallest . . .

THE LONDON, 238 F. 645 (E.D. Pa. 1917)

. . . The respondent answers that the sum demandable was $30.24, the one-half of $60.48, the amount earned, . . .