The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 28
CLERKS OF THE CIRCUIT COURTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 28.32

28.32 Destruction of certain instruments.—After the expiration of 20 years from the date of the execution of any bond or other instrument held by the clerk of the circuit court or a sheriff of any of the several counties of the state, which said instrument was executed to secure the performance or nonperformance of any act or matter and no proceeding of any type is pending involving said instrument any of the several clerks of the circuit courts or sheriffs of the state are hereby authorized, empowered and directed to cancel said instruments and to destroy the same upon making appropriate notation of the destruction and disposition thereof upon any remaining records pertaining thereto.

History.—s. 1, ch. 25502, 1949.

F.S. 28.32 on Google Scholar

F.S. 28.32 on Casetext

Amendments to 28.32

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 28.32

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 28.32.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA, v. M. AZAR, II,, 376 F. Supp. 3d 100 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . That rate-28.32 percent-had been determined using a distribution base of salaries, wages, and fringe . . . According to IHS, it had no issue using the 28.32 percent rate that the Tribe had negotiated for all . . . This approach yielded a base amount of $ 6,655,712, which, when multiplied by the 28.32 percent indirect . . . The observant mathematicians will notice that 28.32% of $ 6,655,712 is in fact roughly $ 1,884,897. . . .

ACCOUNTABLE HEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC v. WELLNESS CORPORATE SOLUTIONS, LLC,, 333 F. Supp. 3d 1133 (D. Kan. 2018)

. . . $5,227.50 $2,467.09 6275 11/3/2015 12/18/2015 957 $15.00 $7.08 6276 11/3/2015 12/18/2015 957 $60.00 $28.32 . . . 957 $112.50 $53.09 6296 11/3/2015 12/18/2015 957 $112.50 $53.09 6297 11/3/2015 12/18/2015 957 $60.00 $28.32 . . . 957 $22.50 $10.62 6301 11/3/2015 12/18/2015 957 $52.50 $24.78 6302 11/3/2015 12/18/2015 957 $60.00 $28.32 . . .

SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, v. HARBORVIEW HEALTHCARE CENTER INC., 191 F. Supp. 3d 13 (D.D.C. 2016)

. . . showing $958.42 in “additional interest due” for certified assistant nurses in August-2013; showing $28.32 . . .

SALAZAR, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 750 F. Supp. 2d 70 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . Plaintiffs request $10,471.48 for 28.32 hours expended by five separate attorneys on vague "Strategy . . .

GOPLEN, On v. INC. W. On v., 453 F. Supp. 2d 759 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . The share price fell from $43.82 on January 15, 2005 to $28.32 on January 18, 2005, the next trading . . .

UNITED STATES v. JG- INC. PR KM, 331 F. Supp. 2d 14 (D.P.R. 2004)

. . . cost methodology, and are as follows: FY 1998 (10/1/97 — 9/30/98): 28.97% FY 1999 (10/1/98 — 9/30/99): 28.32% . . .

AMERICAN RAISIN PACKERS, INC, a v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,, 221 F. Supp. 2d 1209 (E.D. Cal. 2002)

. . . . § 28.32. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MACEO,, 873 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1989)

. . . The DEA chemist testified that the government’s exhibit contained 28.32 grams of 72% pure cocaine base . . .

EICHENSEER, v. RESERVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 682 F. Supp. 1355 (N.D. Miss. 1988)

. . . James, The Law of Torts, §§ 18.6, 28.32 (1956 ed.) . . .

In ROBINSON, LEVY, v. D. ROBINSON,, 75 B.R. 985 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1987)

. . . thence leaving said West line of Lot 12 and run Easterly along said North side of the wall a distance of 28.32 . . .

HARTMAN, v. OPELIKA MACHINE AND WELDING COMPANY, 414 So. 2d 1105 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . James, § 28.32, and Greeno v. Clark Equip. Co., 237 F.Supp. 427, 429 (N.D.Ind.1965). . . .

In HURRICANE ELKHORN COAL CORP. II,, 15 B.R. 987 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 1981)

. . . It avers that the net price it realized from the sale of its coal to Consumers was $28.32 per ton, and . . .

In VALUATION PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTIONS c AND OF REGIONAL RAIL REORGANIZATION ACT OF, 531 F. Supp. 1191 (Reg'l Rail Reorg. Ct. 1981)

. . . done exceedingly well to contain the loss of what had been a substantial portion of its traffic to 28.32 . . .

MERCED v. AUTO PAK CO. INC. S C AUTO PAK CO. INC. v. SOUTHBRIDGE TOWERS, INC., 533 F.2d 71 (2d Cir. 1976)

. . . James, The Law of Torts § 28.32 (1956), and have certain of the same features under New York law. . . .

CHESTNUT, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY,, 445 F.2d 967 (4th Cir. 1971)

. . . James, supra § 28.32. . . .

v., 44 Cust. Ct. 678 (Cust. Ct. 1960)

. . . Anglia Anglia de luxe Prefect Material and Labor £275.86 £282.28 £295.38 Usual general expenses 27.59 28.32 . . .