The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Moore, et al., Moore's Federal Practice § 23.21[2] (3d ed. 1999) ("For a class action to proceed, the . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice § 23.21[3][a] (3d ed. 2012) ). . . .
. . . "has broad discretion to modify the class definition as appropriate." 5 Moore 's Federal Practice § 23.21 . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice § 23.21[1] (Matthew Bender 3d ed. 1997) ). . . .
. . . For instance, § 21.23 (air-crafts) contains subparts on flight (§§ 23.21-23.255); structure (§§ 23.301 . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[1] (Matthew Bender 3d ed. 1997)). . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21 [5] at 23-61 (3rd ed. 1999). . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice-Civil § 23.21[5] (3d ed. 2016) (same). . . . See Moore, supra, § 23.21[5] (“Because [in a Rule 23(b)(2) class] the defendant is obligated to comply . . .
. . . included or excluded from the class by reference to objective criteria.” 5 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 23.21 . . . criteria” by which to evaluate whether an individual belongs in the class. 5 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 23.21 . . .
. . . . § 23.21-35 (loan program); id. § 57.2201-11 (scholarship program); id. § 414.67 (incentive payments . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[6]); see also Robidoux v. . . .
. . . Moore et al., 5 Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21 [1] (3d ed.) . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[3][a] (3d ed. 2012)). . . .
. . . See 5 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 23.21[1] (2015) (describing the “implied condition” a class be “susceptible . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 23.21 [1] (3d ed.1999) (noting that a class must be "susceptible . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[6]). . . .
. . . Moore et al., 5 Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[1] (3d ed.) . . . Moore, supra, § 23.21[3][a]. . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[1] (Matthew Bender 3d ed.1997)). . . . Young, 693 F.3d at 538-539 (citing Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[3] (citations omitted)). . . . Young, 693 F.3d at 538-539 (citing Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[3] (citations omitted)). . . .
. . . . §§ 23.21-22). . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21(3)(c) (Matthew Bender 3d ed.2011)); see also Tidenberg v. . . . unmanageable virtually by definition,” see Heffelfinger, 2008 WL 8128621, at *5; 5 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 23.21 . . .
. . . Moore et al., MooRe’s FedeRal Praotioe § 23.21[3][a] (3d ed. 2012) (“For a class to be sufficiently defined . . .
. . . Moore et al, Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 23.21[1] (3d ed.1997)). . . . Admin., 796 F.2d 576, 580 (1st Cir.1986); Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 23.21[3][c]). . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[3][e] (3d ed. 2008) (“A class definition is inadequate . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice, § 23.21[3] (Matthew Bender 3d ed.). . . .
. . . 25.00% 130 56 43% 13 23.21% 111 46 4i % 15.22% 204 86 42% 10 11.63% 389 155 67.32% 38.26% Iowa, S Iowa . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[6], at 23-62.2 (3d ed.2003)); Bertulli v. Indep. . . .
. . . for each potential class member just to determine class membership”); 5 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 23.21 . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[1], at 23-47 (Matthew Bender 3d ed. 1997). . . .
. . . Moore et al, Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21 [1], at 23-47 (Matthew Bender 3d ed. 1997) (citations omitted . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[6]). . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[3][a] (3d ed. 2012) (“For a class to be sufficiently defined . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[6]). . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice, § 23.21[1] (2001). . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[1] (Matthew Bender 3d ed. 1997) (“Although the text of . . . Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[3] (citations omitted). . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 23.21[6] (3d ed. 2011) (“If the court determines that a proposed . . .
. . . Id. at 341-42 (collecting eases); see generally 5-23 Moore’s Federal Practice — Civil § 23.21[3][a] ( . . .
. . . Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21, at 23-47 (3d ed. 1997)); see also William B. . . .
. . . Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 23.21[1] (3d ed. 1998)) (“Moore’s Federal Practice”). . . . (citing 5 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶23.21[3]). . . .
. . . See Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[1]. . . .
. . . Practice § 23.21[3][e] (2011). . . .
. . . Practice § 23.21[3][c] (2011). . . .
. . . Practice § 23.21[3][c] (2011). . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21 [4] (3d ed. 2003) (citing Baffa v. . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21(3)(c) (2001)). 4. . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 23.21[3][c] (3rd ed. 2007). 1. . . .
. . . Total Credits ... 00 Sub-Total. 19.99 New Tire Fees* * .00 Shop Fees(*) 1.70 All Taxes. 1.52 Payments 23.21 . . .
. . . See 5 Moore et al., supra, § 23.21[6] (“The court may, in its discretion ... modify the definition of . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[3][c] (3d ed. 2010). . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 23.21[3][c] (3d ed. 2007); Romberio v. . . .
. . . decline in ArthroCare’s stock price by approximately 65% — from its Class Period high of $65.70, to $23.21 . . .
. . . . §§ 23.21-.29 (governing weight limits within which aircraft may be safely operated); 14 C.F.R. § 23.51 . . .
. . . determining who is and who is not a member of the class.” 5 James W Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice 3d § 23.21 . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[3][c] (3d ed.2007)). . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice, § 23.21[1] (2001). . . .
. . . (internal quotations and citation omitted)); 5 Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21 [d] (“[Cjourts commonly . . .
. . . subordinate to the lien of any mortgage encumbering the fee title to the Premises from time to time. 23.21 . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice, § 23.21[1]. . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice, § 23.21[1] (2001). . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[1] (3d ed. 2008) (“Although the text of Rule 23(a) is . . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[3][c] (3d ed. 2008) (“A class definition is inadequate . . . Moore et al, Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[l][b] n. 6 (3d ed.2007). . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice, § 23.21[1] (2001). . . .
. . . Moore et al, Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[1], at 23-44 (3d ed.2008). . . .
. . . When the NYSE opened the next day, Belo’s stock, which had closed the previous day at $23.21, dropped . . .
. . . MOORE ET AL., MOORE’S FEDERAL PRACTICE § 23.21[1], at 23-47 (Matthew Bender 3d ed. 1997) (“Although the . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 23.21[3][c] (3d ed.2007) (explaining that "[a] class definition . . .
. . . For instance, Bastrop ISD reported 198 denials, a 23.21% rate of denial of bilingual-ESL education; Brazosport . . .
. . . Pattern Jury Instr., Civil, No. 23.21 (Supp. 2007). . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice § 23.21 [1], at 23-47 (Matthew Bender 3d ed. 1997) ("It is axiomatic . . .
. . . Moore et ah, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶23.21[1] (3d ed.1998). . . .
. . . See also 5 Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21 [5] at 23-55 (3d ed.2005) (in a Rule 23(b)(2) class action . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21 [5] at 23-61 (3d ed.1999); Boughton v. . . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[5] at 23-61 (3d ed.1999)). . . .
. . . Qwest’s purchasing diminished, however, and he met only 24.35% of his Qwest quota for 2001 and 23.21% . . .
. . . Reject_to Accept_to Reject Class 3 2,291,751/98.24% 41,029/1.76%_747/98.68%_10/1.32% Class 6 266,151,238/23.21% . . .
. . . Although 88.03% of Class 6 claim holders voted for the Plan, only 23.21% of the amount of the claims . . .
. . . Although 88.03% of Class 6 claim holders voted for the Plan, only 23.21% of the amount of the claims . . .
. . . H 23.21[1] (3d ed.1998). . . .
. . . in number (88.03%) voted to accept the Plan, less than two-thirds in amount of the Class 6 claims (23.21% . . .
. . . Moore et al., MOORE’S FEDERAL PRACTICE ¶ 23.21[3][c] (3d ed. 1999) (“A class definition is inadequate . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 23.21[3][c] (3d ed. 1999) (“A class definition is inadequate . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[4] (3d ed.2003) (citing Baffa v. . . . See generally 5 Moore et al., supra note 65, § 23.21[4][a] ("[A] class description that defines a class . . .
. . . MooRE et al., MooRe’s Federal PRACTICE § 23.21[6], at 23-62.2 (3d ed.2003); see DeBremaecker v. . . .
. . . Moore et al., MooRe’s FEDERAL PRACTICE § 23.21[6], at 23-62.2 (3d ed.2003); see DeBremaecker v. . . .
. . . exist and the class representatives must be members of the proposed class. 5 Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21 . . .
. . . Moore, 5 Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21 (3d ed.2000) (“It is axiomatic that in order for a class action . . .
. . . %BREG District 1 23.21 21.04 18.62 District 2 45.22 41.46 39.99 District 3 40.32 37.55 34.97 District . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice, § 23.21[6], at 23-62.2 (3d ed.2001). . . .
. . . Practice § 23.21 (3d ed.2000). . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶23.21[1] (3d ed.1998). . . . See 5 Moore’s Federal Practioe, ¶ 23.21[3]. . . .
. . . MooRE et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.21[5] at 23-61 (3d ed.1999). . . .
. . . 62; RevJProc. 87-57 § 2.02(2), 1987 C.B. 687; Jacob Mertens, Jr., Mertens Law of Federal Taxation §§ 23.21 . . .
. . . See 5 Moore’s Federal Practice 3d § 23.21[6], at 23-59 (Matthew Bender 3d ed.1997). . . .
. . . See generally Manual for Complex Litigation 3d., §§ 23.14 and 23.21 (1995). . . .
. . . Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction § 23.21 (4th ed. 1985 & Supp.1993) (collecting Supreme Court . . .
. . . amount of child support paid to the former wife and an elimination of the automatic annual adjustment of 23.21% . . .
. . . . §§ 91.165-91.215, §§ 23.21-23.33, § 135.159 and § 121, Appendix A (1987). . . .
. . . could be had “only under the same conditions as govern removal generally.” 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 23.21 . . .
. . . Indian applicants for ICWA funds, and, if so, whether the regulations contained in 25 C.F.R. sections 23.21 . . .
. . . See 19 CFR §§ 23.11, 23.21, 23.23, and 23.24 (1970). . . . .
. . . 5.76 32.69 7.56 29.22 21.99 6.08 24.27 21.23 28.07 16.70 15.48 28.06 24.28 25.93 26.24 20.53 20.78 23.21 . . .
. . . Trustee would be paying $200 to debtor’s attorney, $23.21 for the trustees fees and expenses and $32.06 . . .
. . . must pay over to the trustee a grand, total of $255.27, of which $200 will be paid to her attorney, $23.21 . . .