The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title III
LEGISLATIVE BRANCH; COMMISSIONS

Chapter 11
LEGISLATIVE ORGANIZATION, PROCEDURES, AND STAFFING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 11.13

11.13 Compensation of members.—

(1)(a) The annual salaries of members of the Senate and House of Representatives, payable in 12 equal monthly installments, shall be:

1. The President of the Senate and Speaker of the House of Representatives, $25,000 each.

2. All other members of the Senate and House of Representatives, $18,000 each.

(b) Effective July 1, 1986, and each July 1 thereafter, the annual salaries of members of the Senate and House of Representatives shall be adjusted by the average percentage increase in the salaries of state career service employees for the fiscal year just concluded. The Appropriations Committee of each house shall certify to the Office of Legislative Services the average percentage increase in the salaries of state career service employees before July 1 of each year. The Office of Legislative Services shall, as of July 1 of each year, determine the adjusted annual salaries as provided herein.

(2) During the time the Legislature is in session, each legislator shall be paid subsistence at a rate to be established by the President of the Senate for members of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives for members of the House. Each legislator, in addition to subsistence, shall be paid travel expenses in accordance with s. 112.061(7) and (8) for actual travel between the legislator’s home and the seat of government for not more than one round trip per week or fraction of a week during any regular, special, or extraordinary session of the Legislature or for the convening of either the House or Senate for official business.

(3) Members of any standing or select committee or subcommittee thereof shall receive per diem and travel expenses as provided in s. 112.061 from the appropriation for legislative expenses.

(4) Each member of the Legislature shall be entitled to receive a monthly allowance for intradistrict expenses in an amount set annually by the President of the Senate for members of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives for members of the House. In setting the amount, the costs of maintaining a legislative district office or offices that provide an appropriate level of constituent services shall be considered. The procedure for disbursement of the monthly intradistrict expense allowed shall be set from time to time by the Office of Legislative Services, with the approval of the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives or their respective designees. Such expenses shall be a proper expense of the Legislature and shall be disbursed from the appropriation for legislative expense. The expenses provided under this subsection shall not include any travel and per diem reimbursed under subsections (2) and (3) or the rules of either house.

(5)(a) All expenditures of the Senate, House of Representatives, and offices, committees, and divisions of the Legislature shall be made pursuant to and, unless changed as provided below, within the limits of budgetary estimates of expenditure for each fiscal year prepared and submitted prior to June 15 by the administrative head of each such house, office, committee, or division and approved by the President of the Senate as to Senate budgets, by the Speaker of the House of Representatives as to House budgets, and by the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives acting jointly as to joint committees and other units of the Legislature. Amounts in the approved estimates of expenditure may be transferred between budgetary units within the Senate, House of Representatives, and joint activities by the original approving authority. Funds may be transferred between items of appropriation to the Legislature when approved by the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, provided the total amount appropriated to the legislative branch shall not be altered. The Office of Legislative Services shall formulate and present to each house and office thereof recommendations concerning the form and preparation of such budgets and procedures for their adoption and transmission.

(b) Thirty days prior to the date established by s. 216.023 for submission of legislative budgets by all state agencies to the Governor, all budgetary units required to submit estimates of expenditures as provided by paragraph (a) shall annually submit tentative estimates of their financial needs for the next fiscal year beginning July 1 to the authorities required by that paragraph so that the financial needs of the Legislature for the ensuing fiscal year may be reported to the Governor by the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives as required by s. 216.081.

(c) The Office of Legislative Services shall submit on forms prescribed by the Chief Financial Officer requested allotments of appropriations for the fiscal year. It shall be the duty of the Chief Financial Officer to release the funds and authorize the expenditures for the legislative branch to be made from the appropriations on the basis of the requested allotments. However, the aggregate of such allotments shall not exceed the total appropriations available for the fiscal year.

(6) The pay of members of the Senate and House of Representatives shall be only as set by law.

History.—s. 1, ch. 19626, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 103(1); s. 1, ch. 20839, 1941; s. 3, ch. 21933, 1943; s. 1, ch. 24999, 1949; s. 1, ch. 26539, 1951; s. 2, ch. 29627, 1955; s. 1, ch. 57-343; s. 1, ch. 57-1988; s. 1, ch. 62-7; s. 2, ch. 63-400; s. 1, ch. 69-3; s. 5, ch. 69-52; s. 8, ch. 69-82; ss. 31, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 73-113; s. 1, ch. 77-88; s. 1, ch. 79-215; s. 1, ch. 79-224; s. 1, ch. 81-99; s. 1, ch. 81-259; s. 8, ch. 85-322; s. 12, ch. 95-147; s. 3, ch. 98-136; s. 1, ch. 99-333; s. 2, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 11.13 on Google Scholar

F.S. 11.13 on Casetext

Amendments to 11.13

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 11.13

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 11.13.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

BLACK VEATCH CORPORATION, v. ASPEN INSURANCE UK LTD., 378 F. Supp. 3d 975 (D. Kan. 2019)

. . . Windt, Insurance Claims and Disputes § 11.13 (6th ed. 2018). . . . Windt, Insurance Claims and Disputes § 11.13 (6th ed. 2018). . . . Windt, Insurance Claims and Disputes § 11.13 n. 8 ( Truax , despite its broad holding, "could be explained . . .

J. BOGAN, v. MTD CONSUMER GROUP, INCORPORATED,, 919 F.3d 332 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . See also FIFTH CIRCUIT PATTERN JURY INSTRUCTIONS (Civil Cases) 11.13 (2014); Price Waterhouse v. . . .

IN RE ICPW LIQUIDATION CORPORATION, a ICPW a v., 600 B.R. 640 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Defendants assert that this entire action is barred by the release (the "DIP Release") contained in section 11.13 . . . The Creditors' Committee also objected to the DIP Release contained in section 11.13 of the DIP Agreement . . .

ST. BERNARD PARISH GOVERNMENT, v. UNITED STATES,, 916 F.3d 987 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 11.13 ("A final determination of the [NAD] shall be reviewable and enforceable by any United States . . .

FLEXUSPINE, INC. v. GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC., 879 F.3d 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2018)

. . . superior surface of the upper body and the inferior surface of the lower body. ’810 patent col. 36 11.13 . . .

AUSMUS, L. v. PERDUE, C., 289 F. Supp. 3d 1227 (D. Colo. 2017)

. . . . § 11.13, and Chapter 7 of Title 5 of the United States Code, Plaintiffs seek judicial review of a final . . . Plaintiffs timely appealed to this Court pursuant to 7 C.F.R. § 11.13(a). . . . Pursuant to 7 U.S.C. § 6999 and 7 C.F.R. § 11.13(a), the United States District Courts may review and . . .

ADKINS, v. VILSACK,, 252 F. Supp. 3d 588 (N.D. Tex. 2017)

. . . . § 11.13, and Chapter 7 of Title 5 of the United States Code, Plaintiffs seek judicial review of a final . . . Pursuant to 7 U.S.C. § 6999 and 7 C.F.R. § 11.13(a), the United States District Courts may review and . . .

COOPER TIRE RUBBER COMPANY, Co. Co. v. UNITED STATES, AFL- CIO, CLC,, 217 F. Supp. 3d 1373 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2017)

. . . deposit rate, Commerce stated that it would subtract from the percentage the “export subsidy rate” of 11.13% . . . Cooper maintains that if Commerce uses 11.13% as the export subsidy adjustment, which is based on Cooper . . . This would result in a cash deposit rate of 6.03% for Cooper, calculated by subtracting 11.13% and 8.68% . . . That provided Commerce with data from which it could calculate, at 11.13%, a percentage for the export . . . Defendant takes the position that Commerce acted permissibly in making the 11.13% export subsidy adjustment . . .

UNWIRED PLANET, LLC, v. GOOGLE INC., 841 F.3d 995 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

. . . Id. at col. 211. 48-58, col, 3 11.13-19. One secondary reference is Wilbert 0. . . .

COCONUT GROVE PADS, INC. v. MICH MICH TGR, INC. TGR, v., 222 F. Supp. 3d 222 (E.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . material that forms at least a section of the main portion 11a of the retainer 30. ’766 Patent col.4 11.13 . . .

JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC. v. CELLTRION HEALTHCARE CO. LTD., 211 F. Supp. 3d 364 (D. Mass. 2016)

. . . Id,; ’272 patent col.98 11.13-15. V. . . .

RSH LIQUIDATING TRUST, v. C. MAGNACCA, E. J. A. R. H. L. D., 553 B.R. 298 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2016)

. . . According to the Trust, in section 11.13 of that agreement, RadioSh-ack released the directors from claims . . .

VAN CUREN, f k a v. FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE CORPORATION, 651 F. App'x 611 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 11.13(b) (2016); 7 U.S.C. § 1508(j)(2)(B). . . .

VAN CUREN, f k a v. FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE CORPORATION, 651 F. App'x 611 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 11.13(b) (2016); 7 U.S.C. § 1508(j)(2)(B). . . .

RADWARE, LTD. v. NETWORKS, INC., 147 F. Supp. 3d 974 (N.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . balancing client requests among redundant network servers in different geographical locations.” ’319 col.l 11.13 . . .

CARDSOFT LLC, v. VERIFONE, INC. S. A., 807 F.3d 1346 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

. . . Id. at col. 3 11.13-14. . . .

HITACHI MAXELL, LTD. v. TOP VICTORY ELECTRONICS TAIWAN CO. LTD. TPV l USA Co. TPV Co. TPV TPV Co., 143 F. Supp. 3d 485 (E.D. Tex. 2015)

. . . Id. at col.7 11.13-21. . . . See, e.g., id. at Abstract, col.3 11.30-31, col.7 11.13-17. . . . Id. at col.6 11.13-36. . . .

EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC, v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, L. P. L. P. LLC, v. LLC, v. LLC, v. LLC, v. LLC, v. LLC, v. LLC, v. LLC, v., 137 F. Supp. 3d 1157 (N.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . computer and digital networks, as well as on physical, published, and “other” media. ’682 patent, col.3 11.13 . . .

SHIRE LLC, LLC, v. AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, LLC, LLC,, 802 F.3d 1301 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

. . . Id. at col.9 11.13-21. One embodiment of the invention is LDX dimesylate. See id. at col.811.43-67. . . .

J. O. C. FARMS, LLC. v. RURAL COMMUNITY INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. d b a s J., 131 F. Supp. 3d 514 (E.D.N.C. 2015)

. . . . § 11.13. . . .

UNITED STATES v. WASHINGTON,, 129 F. Supp. 3d 1069 (W.D. Wash. 2015)

. . . . ; 11.13. . . .

OIP TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. AMAZON. COM, INC., 788 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

. . . Id. at col. 2 11.13-19. . . .

GARCIA, v. SPECTRUM OF CREATIONS INC., 102 F. Supp. 3d 541 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . Garcia Deck 11.13; Flores Deck ¶ 13. . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 163 So. 3d 478 (Fla. 2015)

. . . or Lascivious Offenses Committed Upon or in the Presence of an Elderly Person or Disabled Person); 11.13 . . . State, 920 So.2d 32 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). 11.13 VOYEURISM § 810.14, Fla. Stat. . . .

IN RE RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC,, 531 B.R. 1 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . . ¶¶ 11.13-11.14.) . . .

AUSTIN v. UNITED STATES,, 118 Fed. Cl. 776 (Fed. Cl. 2014)

. . . the statute, is explicit regarding when and where disappointed claimants can seek judicial review: § 11.13 . . . Id. § 11.13. . . . See 7 C.F.R. § 11.13. . . .

EPOS TECHNOLOGIES LTD. S. A. S. A. USA, v. PEGASUS TECHNOLOGIES LTD., 766 F.3d 1338 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

. . . U-shaped portion ... adapted to engage with the upper edge of the writing surface.” '051 patent col. 6 11.13 . . .

MIDLAND FARMS, LLC, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, NAU, 35 F. Supp. 3d 1056 (D.S.D. 2014)

. . . . § 11.13, the FCIA, and federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Doc. 1 at ¶ 6. . . . Section 11.13 outlines when a litigant may seek judicial review under the APA of an administrative determination . . . See 7 C.F.R. § 11.13. . . . administrative remedies and that the Agency Defendants’ determinations are ripe for judicial review under § 11.13 . . .

ALLERGAN, INC. v. APOTEX INC. Hi- Co. v., 754 F.3d 952 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

. . . Johnstone at 17 11.13-15. The conclusion of Johnstone’s detailed description makes this clear. . . .

A. ELKJER, v. SCHEEF STONE, L. L. P., 8 F. Supp. 3d 845 (N.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . Id. at § 11.13. . . . Partnership Agreement at § 11.13. . . . Partnership Agreement at § 11.13 (emphasis added). . . .

WEST v. BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON, INC., 967 F. Supp. 2d 479 (D.N.H. 2013)

. . . McNamara, Tort & Insurance Practice, in 8 New Hampshire Practice § 11.13, at 11-14 (3d ed. 2003). . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 122 So. 3d 263 (Fla. 2013)

. . . (Voyeurism); 11.13(a)-(b) (Video Voyeurism); 11.13(c)-(d) (Video Voyeurism Dissemination); 11.13(e)- . . . APPENDIX 11.13 VOYEURISM § 810.14, Fla. Stat. . . . See Instruction 11.13(c). For Video Voyeurism under Fla. . . . See Instruction 11.13(g). Then, give (a) and/or (b) and! . . . Instructions 11.13(h) and 13.5 are new instructions. . . . .

BARTLETT LLC L. A. D. N. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE J., 716 F.3d 464 (8th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 11.13(a). However, not all county committee decisions are eligible for administrative review. . . . above, only a final decision of the NAD is reviewable by a district court. 7 U.S.C. § 6999; 7 C.F.R. § 11.13 . . . See 7 U.S.C. §§ 6998-6999; 7 C.F.R. §§ 11.9; 11.13; Deaf Smith Cnty. Grain Processors, Inc. v. . . . merits of the county committees’ decisions are then reviewable under 7 U.S.C. § 6999 and 7 C.F.R. § 11.13 . . .

J. LAMSON, v. UNITED STATES,, 110 Fed. Cl. 691 (Fed. Cl. 2013)

. . . Various products may be used to achieve the experience of virtual reality. ’764 patent col.4 11.13-28 . . . Various products may be used to achieve the experience of virtual reality. ’764 patent col.4 11.13-29 . . .

ERNIE BALL, INC. v. EARVANA, LLC,, 502 F. App'x 971 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

. . . Id. col. 8 11.13-31. . . .

APPLE INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. LLC,, 695 F.3d 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . Id. at col.5 11.13-14. . . .

In ABBOTT DIABETES CARE INC., 696 F.3d 1142 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . specification describes methods and devices for monitoring glucose levels for diabetics. '752 patent col.l 11.13 . . .

POZEN INC. v. PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. Dr. s, 696 F.3d 1151 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . migraines comprising co-timely administration of 5-HT agonists and long-acting NSAIDs. '499 patent col.l 11.13 . . .

In RAMBUS INC., 694 F.3d 42 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . request, onto the bus synchronously with respect to the external clock signal. '918 Patent col. 26 11.13 . . .

UNITED STATES v. WARD, 482 F. App'x 922 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . The Government’s expert further testified that the small bag from Brown’s pocket contained 11.13 grams . . .

DOE v. UNITED STATES,, 106 Fed. Cl. 118 (Fed. Cl. 2012)

. . . . § 11.13(a) (2012), but a program participant may not seek such review until NAD has rendered a final . . . decision pursuant to the procedures set forth in part 11, id. § 11.13(b) (2012). . . .

CHICAGO BOARD OPTIONS EXCHANGE, INC. v. INTERNATIONAL SECURITIES EXCHANGE, LLC,, 677 F.3d 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . discloses an invention that relates generally to markets for the exchange of securities. '707 Patent, col.l 11.13 . . .

SMARTMETRIC INC. v. AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, v., 476 F. App'x 742 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . providers through the use of a smart card containing network access information. '464 patent col.l 11.13 . . . system that allows a user to automatically connect to a network service provider.” '464 patent col.l 11.13 . . .

ADVANCED FIBER TECHNOLOGIES AFT TRUST, v. J L FIBER SERVICES, INC., 674 F.3d 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . extending in a direction inclined relative to the longitudinal extent of said grooves. '940 Patent col.15 11.13 . . .

ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS, INC. s, a v. MOC PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC. a, 856 F. Supp. 2d 1156 (S.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . col.20 11.10-12, and Claim 17 covers those complementary to a flare tube fitting, '855 Patent col.20 11.13 . . .

IA LABS CA, LLC, v. NINTENDO CO. LTD., 863 F. Supp. 2d 430 (D. Md. 2012)

. . . (Id. col. 16 11.13-31.) 3. . . .

GRACE, v. FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC., 845 F. Supp. 2d 653 (W.D.N.C. 2012)

. . . computed on an hourly basis, averaged $9.87 per hour ($545 per week), $10.42 per hour ($575.46 per week), $11.13 . . .

In SP CONTROLS, INC., 453 F. App'x 990 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . claim 1 claims “[a] device control apparatus ... comprising” enumerated components. '794 patent col.9, 11.13 . . .

IGT, v. BALLY GAMING INTERNATIONAL, INC., 659 F.3d 1109 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . Appellee’s Br. 44 (citing '885 patent col.3 11.13-15). . [8] Again, the district court correctly construed . . .

FUJITSU LIMITED, v. TELLABS OPERATIONS, INC. v. v., 821 F. Supp. 2d 1009 (N.D. Ill. 2011)

. . . interfaces reside in a same office but each interface to separate WDM networks.” '772 Patent, eol.8 11.13 . . .

UNIGENE LABORATORIES, INC. v. APOTEX, INC., 655 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . for liquid nasal compositions containing polypeptides as active ingredient [sic].” '315 patent col.2 11.13 . . .

CYBERSOURCE CORPORATION, v. RETAIL DECISIONS, INC., 654 F.3d 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . patent’s specification discusses referencing “a database of Internet addresses,” '154 patent, col.3 11.13 . . .

In HUDSON, R. v. N. A., 455 B.R. 648 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2011)

. . . Cameron, § 11.13 at 386 (citing Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 565.28). . . .

MHL TEK, LLC, v. NISSAN MOTOR CO. Co. LLC, Dr. h. c. F. AG, AG, AG, BMW AG AG BMW LLC, BMW Co. LLC,, 655 F.3d 1266 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . transducer; and (5) a needle and spring in the elongate portion. '516 patent col.18 1.66-C01.19 1.9, col.19 11.13 . . .

In NTP, INC., 654 F.3d 1279 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . originated information to the at least one of a plurality of destination processors”); '172 patent col.53 11.13 . . .

EON- NET LP, L. L. P. v. FLAGSTAR BANCORP,, 653 F.3d 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . Id col.4 11.13-15. . . .

SMITH NEPHEW, INC. v. ARTHREX, INC., 453 F. App'x 977 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . See, e.g., id. col.6 11.13-17. . . .

In PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION,, 453 B.R. 570 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 2011)

. . . It says that nothing in 11.13 will have the effect of impairing the rights of the nonparticipating and . . . the confirmation order or the plan which is preemptory or supervening, which would include Section 11.13 . . . It says literally that nothing in the confirmation order or the plan including Section 11.13 will impair . . .

FOX GROUP, INC. v. CREE, INC., 819 F. Supp. 2d 490 (E.D. Va. 2011)

. . . Id. col.4 11.13-15. . . . grown at an angle “greater than 25 degrees as measured from a normal growth axis,” '026 patent col.11 11.13 . . .

UNITED STATES v. WB STELLAR IP OWNER LLC, LLC, L. P. v. L. P., 800 F. Supp. 2d 496 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . See Housing Choice Voucher Program Guidebook §§ 11.1-11.13. . . . .

BILLUPS- ROTHENBERG, INC. v. ASSOCIATED REGIONAL AND UNIVERSITY PATHOLOGISTS, INC. ARUP, 642 F.3d 1031 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . chromosome six, that does not disclose the exact location or sequence of the mutation. '681 patent col.32 11.13 . . .

FUJITSU LIMITED, v. TELLABS OPERATIONS, INC. v. v., 782 F. Supp. 2d 635 (N.D. Ill. 2011)

. . . (Id. at col. 1 11.13-45.) . . .

INNOVENTION TOYS, LLC, v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC. R Us,, 637 F.3d 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . Id. col.3 11.26-30; col.9 11.13-17. . . .

AMERICAN PILEDRIVING EQUIPMENT, INC. v. GEOQUIP, INC. v., 637 F.3d 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . See id. col.9 11.37-44, col.ll 11.13-18 (emphasis added). . . . recites “an eccentric weight portion connected to said cylindrical gear portion.” '964 Patent col.ll 11.13 . . . relevant part “an eccentric weight portion connected to said cylindrical gear portion.” '964 Patent col.ll 11.13 . . .

HOLOGIC, INC. L. P. v. SENORX, INC., 639 F.3d 1329 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . Id. col.10 11.13-17 (emphasis added). Prior art in the field is also relevant to the appeal. . . .

SHARPE, v. GLOBAL SECURITY INTERNATIONAL,, 766 F. Supp. 2d 1272 (S.D. Ala. 2011)

. . . rehired at an hourly rate of $10.00, and subsequently received raises to $10.35 in April 2009, and to $11.13 . . .

ARLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC. v. BRIDGEPORT FITTINGS, INC., 632 F.3d 1246 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . two electrical cables through the connector into a single hole in the junction box. '831 patent col.l 11.13 . . .

In SMURFIT- STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION,, 444 B.R. 111 (Bankr. D. Del. 2011)

. . . Indenture § 11.13. . . .

LAZARE KAPLAN INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. PHOTOSCRIBE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 628 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . Gresser Patent col.2 11.13-68. Herbert Gresser and his company, Group II Manufacturing Ltd. . . . of each of the graphitized spots to form the marking is within about ±1 micron. '938 Patent col.27 11.13 . . .

AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC., 629 F.3d 1311 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . More generally, the virtual server hostname is inserted into the URL. '645 patent col. 4 11.13-19. . . .

ALLIED HOME MORTGAGE CAPITAL CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 95 Fed. Cl. 769 (Fed. Cl. 2010)

. . . the statute, is explicit regarding when and where disappointed claimants can seek judicial review: § 11.13 . . . Court of competent jurisdiction in accordance with chapter 7 of title 5, United States Code. 7 C.F.R. § 11.13 . . .

WHITE III, v. LOOMIS ARMORED US, INC., 729 F. Supp. 2d 897 (E.D. Mich. 2010)

. . . motion papers, the plaintiffs assert that White, who was 51 at the time she was fired, was earning $11.13 . . .

W. WYERS v. MASTER LOCK COMPANY,, 616 F.3d 1231 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . designed to insulate the locking mechanism of the lock from the ingress of contaminants. '649 patent col.7 11.13 . . . Id. col.8 11.13-47. . . .

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. UNITED STATES, L-, 93 Fed. Cl. 1292 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . See '914 patent col.4 11.54-57, col.5 11.4-8, col.5 11.13-15. . . .

In VAIDYANATHAN, 381 F. App'x 985 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . missile after it is a safe distance from the aircraft until it reaches a nonfinal position (id. col. 4 11.13 . . .

ARIAD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY,, 598 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . Id. at col.38 11.13-14. . . .

BAUMGARDNER, v. BIMBO FOOD BAKERIES DISTRIBUTION, INC., 697 F. Supp. 2d 801 (N.D. Ohio 2010)

. . . Baumgardner’s jury demand, arguing that the right to a jury trial in this action is waived by section 11.13 . . . Section 11.13 states, in its entirety: NO JURY TRIAL: The parties hereby knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally . . .

In P. CHAPMAN J., 595 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . Gonzalez Abstract; id. col.l 11.13— 19; id. col.13 11.15-24; id. col.15 11.32-36. . . .

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. UNITED STATES, L-, 596 F.3d 800 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . See '914 patent col.4 11.54-57, col.5 11.4-8, col.5 11.13-15. . . .

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. UNITED STATES, L-, 596 F.3d 800 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . See '914 patent col.4 11.54-57, eol.5 11.4-8, col.5 11.13-15. . . .

BRISTOL COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a v. BOSCH REXROTH INCORPORATED, a a a, 684 F. Supp. 2d 1245 (D. Colo. 2010)

. . . conveyor— and “said second means” — the means for driving the liquid system pump. '125 Patent col. 13 11.13 . . .

NO DOUBT, a v. ACTIVISION PUBLISHING, INC. a, 702 F. Supp. 2d 1139 (C.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . Id. at 1004 (citing McCarthy, Rights of Publicity and Privacy § 11.13[C] at 11-72-73 (1997)). . . .

AVANTE INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. PREMIER ELECTION SOLUTIONS, INC., 663 F. Supp. 2d 778 (E.D. Mo. 2009)

. . . Ex. 3, Col. 6 11. 7-8; Col. 6, 1. 66-Col. 7, 1. 4; Col. 7, 11. 45-50; Col. 14, 11.13-14.) . . .

In PATENT INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION. N. V. L. P. v. USA, Dr. s Dr. s Co. N. V. L. P. v., 583 F.3d 1317 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . See id. col.l 11.13-21. . . .

SANOFI- AVENTIS U. S. LLC, S. A. v. SANDOZ, INC. USA, BV, USA A. S. W. C. GMBH, APP LLC, HF, PLC PLC GES. M. B. H. NFG KG, A. S. MN, 345 F. App'x 594 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . Id. eol.7 11.25-50, col.8 11.13-15. . . .

LYDALL THERMAL ACOUSTICAL, INC. LLC, v. FEDERAL- MOGUL CORPORATION, 344 F. App'x 607 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . See id. col. 12 II.53-col.13 11.13. . . . Id. eol.12 II.53-col.13 11.13 (emphases added). . . .

In SKVORECZ, 580 F.3d 1262 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . alternative embodiment of the present invention” and Figure 13 is a top view of Figure 12. '948 patent col.3 11.13 . . .

RFID TRACKER, LTD. v. WAL- MART STORES, INC., 342 F. App'x 628 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . 11.11— 14 (describing interrogator/reader’s receiver capability); id., eol.7 11.7-23, 11.34-53, col.8 11.13 . . .

GEMTRON CORPORATION, v. SAINT- GOBAIN CORPORATION,, 572 F.3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . See, e.g., '573 patent eol.2 11.53-58; id. col.6 11.13-29. . . .

ENTERPRISE NATIONAL BANK, v. J. VILSACK,, 568 F.3d 229 (D.C. Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 11.13 (tracking statute). . . . .

In MORTGAGE LENDERS NETWORK USA, INC. USA, v., 406 B.R. 213 (Bankr. D. Del. 2009)

. . . (Id. at p. 83, § 11.13.) 12. Similarly, Financial Security Assurance, Inc. . . . (Id. at p. 83, § 11.13.) 17. . . . Ex. 24, p. 83, § 11.13; Def. Tr. Ex. 25, p. 83, § 11.13.) 3. . . .

BOSS INDUSTRIES, INC. v. YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, U. S. A. INC., 333 F. App'x 531 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . to the snowmobile to resist horizontal movement”); eol.5 11.54-65; col.8 II.53-58; '630 patent col.2 11.13 . . .

ABBOTT LABORATORIES, v. SANDOZ, INC. GMBH, USA, v., 566 F.3d 1282 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . about 14.7° about 17.8° about 21.5° about 22.0° about 23.4° about 24.5° about 28.1° '507 patent, col.16 11.13 . . . ‘The Process For Preparing Crystal A of The Compound (I).’ ” Id. at 457 (quoting '507 patent, col.2 11.13 . . . language to describe the very two processes that are mirrored in claims 2 and 5. '507 patent col.2 11.13 . . .

ARIAD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY,, 560 F.3d 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . Id. at col.38 11.13-14. . . .

ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. HOSLER,, 626 F. Supp. 2d 1105 (D. Colo. 2009)

. . . (p. 260, 11.13-18); (k) she felt paranoid (p. 260,1. 22); (l) she found herself in “a daze” because of . . .

MORGAN, v. FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC., 551 F.3d 1233 (11th Cir. 2008)

. . . $ 7.93 2001: $7.43 2002: $ 9.68 2002 $ 8.30 2002: $7.65 2003: $10.38 2003 $ 8.90 2003: $7.79 2004: $11.13 . . .

WELKER BEARING COMPANY, v. PHD, INCORPORATED,, 550 F.3d 1090 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . .”); id. at col.6 11.13-16 (“The central post 70 extends through and is independent from the piston 54 . . .

TECHNOLOGY LICENSING CORPORATION, v. VIDEOTEK, INC., 545 F.3d 1316 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . which second compared signal is a logic level representation of said sync portion. '250 patent col.28 11.13 . . .

Mr. COMBS No. v. HOMER- CENTER SCHOOL DISTRICT F. D. C. No. Dr. No. v. D. C. No. Dr. No. v. D. C. Mr. No. v. D. C. Mr. No. v. D. D. C. No. v. D. C., 540 F.3d 231 (3d Cir. 2008)

. . . See also 22 Pa.Code § 11.13 (2008). . . .

H. Jr. D. L. v., 130 T.C. 170 (T.C. 2008)

. . . Custodianship Limited 1,763.43 11.13 L. Custodianship Limited 1,763.43 11.13 C. . . . Custodianship Limited 1,763.43 11.13 V. . . . Custodianship Limited 1,763.43 11.13 Total 15,849.07 100.01 Each petitioner timely filed a Form 709 for . . .