Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 10.15 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 10.15 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 10.15 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 10.15

The 2025 Florida Statutes

The statute you have selected cannot be found.
Copyright © 1995-2025 The Florida Legislature • Privacy Statement • Contact Us


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 10.15

Total Results: 14

Greene v. State

238 So. 2d 296

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1970 | Docket: 552370

Cited 17 times | Published

ex post facto Law. * * *" U.S.Const. art. I, § 10. [15] 96 Fla. 768, 119 So. 380 (1928). [16] 91 So

In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Sam Rabin, Witness-Appellee v. United States of America, Movant-Appellant

896 F.2d 1267, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8312

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 16, 1990 | Docket: 824274

Cited 16 times | Published

Beale & W. Bryson, Grand Jury Law and Practice § 10.15, at 57 n. 19 (1986); see also United States v.

Jacob Maxwell, Incorporated v. Veeck

110 F.3d 749

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 13, 1997 | Docket: 172775

Cited 12 times | Published

3 M. Nimmer & D. Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 10.15[A], at 10-125-126 (1996) ("Upon such rescission

Jacob Maxwell, Inc. v. Veeck

110 F.3d 749, 42 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1467, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 7625, 1997 WL 154736

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 18, 1997 | Docket: 420765

Cited 9 times | Published

Nimmer & D. Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 10.15[A], at 10-125-126 (1996) (“Upon such rescission

Faye L. Roth Revocable Trust v. UBS Painewebber Inc.

323 F. Supp. 2d 1279, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11232, 2004 WL 1381697

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2004 | Docket: 2360236

Cited 7 times | Published

contained in the registration statement — see Section 10, 15 U.S.C. § 77j — , and because only public offerings

Eaton v. Coal Par of West Virginia, Inc.

580 F. Supp. 572, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19526

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1984 | Docket: 1009848

Cited 5 times | Published

a prospectus satisfying the requirements of section 10, 15 U.S. C.A. § 77j (1981). Section 13 of the Securities

Rxstrategies, Inc. v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.

390 F. Supp. 3d 1341

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 29, 2019 | Docket: 64325327

Cited 3 times | Published

(citing Earl W. Kintner, Federal Antitrust Law § 10.15 (2013)). RxStrategies alleges the relevant geographic

MDC 6, LLC v. NRG INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC

93 So. 3d 1145, 2012 WL 3101843, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12516

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2012 | Docket: 60310463

Cited 2 times | Published

with regard to the foreclosure claims because section 10.15 of the subject mortgages requires arbitration

Sarasota County v. STANTON INVESTMENT CO. OF MO.

283 So. 2d 152

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1973 | Docket: 1489731

Cited 2 times | Published

Florida Appellate Practice and Procedure, Vol. 1, § 10.15, the following proposition is stated: While a presumption

Charles Kevin Simpson v. U.S. Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 4, 2021 | Docket: 60108131

Published

offenses. See Fla. Stat. Std. Jury Instr. (Crim.) § 10.15 (West 2020). 4 That listing, in and

Randall Blake, James Bradford v. St. Johns River Power Park System Employees' etc.

275 So. 3d 804

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2019 | Docket: 15891696

Published

Members . . . . 2. Plan section 10.15 provides that any overpayment due to the

Strategic Income Fund v. Spear, Leeds & Kellogg

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 23, 2002 | Docket: 2038944

Published

II. 5 Section 10, 15 U.S.C. § 78j, states in pertinent part as follows:

Pantages v. Construction Trades Qualifying Board

231 So. 2d 236, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6900

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1970 | Docket: 64513107

Published

Dade County.1 *237Pursuant to the provision in section 10-15 of the code for review of such decisions by

Forrest v. J. L. Young & Co.

198 So. 2d 364, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4764

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1967 | Docket: 64500780

Published

judgment. * * * ” Maloy, Fla.Appellate Prac. & Proc., § 10.15. After consideration of the record we find genuine