Cases from cite.case.law:

BLAKE, E. S. T. v. ST. JOHNS RIVER POWER PARK SYSTEM EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN,, 275 So. 3d 804 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Plan section 10.15 provides that any overpayment due to the Plan's trust fund shall be subject to five . . .

IN RE STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT, 272 So. 3d 243 (Fla. 2019)

. . . 25.7 Controlled Substance, if a controlled substance is the contraband alleged Possession of a 790.23 10.15 . . . 25.7 Controlled Substance, if a controlled substance is the contraband alleged Possession of a 790.23 10.15 . . .

RXSTRATEGIES, INC. v. CVS PHARMACY, INC. LLC,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 1341 (M.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . Kintner, Federal Antitrust Law § 10.15 (2013)). . . .

UNIVERSAL INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION, v. MICRO SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, INC., 924 F.3d 32 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . See 3 Nimmer § 10.15[A] (noting that "use by the grantee without authority from the grantor" leads to . . .

PHOTOGRAPHIC ILLUSTRATORS CORPORATION, v. ORGILL, INC., 370 F. Supp. 3d 232 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Nimmer, supra, § 10.15[A][2]; see also Jacob Maxwell, Inc. v. . . . See id.; Nimmer, supra, § 10.15[A][1]. . . .

IN RE STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT, 253 So. 3d 1024 (Fla. 2018)

. . . instructions 10.13 (Shooting or Throwing Missiles in Dwelling), 10.14 (Possession of Forbidden Firearms), 10.15 . . . Felons Carrying a Concealed Weapon or Possessing Firearm/Ammunition/Electric Weapon or Device), and 10.15 . . . Lastly, in instructions 10.15 and 10.15(a), the definition for "possession" is amended based upon In . . . This instruction was adopted in 1981 and was amended in 1989 [540 So.2d 1205] and 2018. 10.15 FELONS . . . [543 So.2d 1205], 1992 [603 So.2d 1175], 2007 [953 So.2d 495], and 2013 [131 So.3d 720], and 2018. 10.15 . . .

SPINELLI, E. v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL L. P. NFL L. L. C. NFL L. L. C. L. L. C. NFL LLC, LLC, LLC, NFL LP, LLC, LP, LLC, LP, Co. LLC, Co. LLC, US, 903 F.3d 185 (2nd Cir. 2018)

. . . Davis , 505 F.3d at 100 ; see also 3 Nimmer on Copyright § 10.15 (2018) ("More generally, when a license . . .

BIRCH, v. STATE, 248 So. 3d 1213 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . defined each form of possession, tracking the pertinent portions of Standard Jury Instruction (Criminal) 10.15 . . .

SWAIN, v. STATE, 226 So. 3d 1002 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . (Crim.) 10.15. . . .

STATE v. JOY, III,, 221 So. 3d 1281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . (Crim.) 10.15. . . . The appropriate standard jury instruction for felon-in-possession charges is Instruction 10.15. . . .

DASH, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NEW YORK,, 238 F. Supp. 3d 375 (E.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . Id. at ¶ 10.15. . . . Id. at ¶ ¶ 10.15-10.21. . . . Id. at ¶¶ 10.13-10.15. . . . Compl. at ¶¶ 10.15-10.17, He also reported one of the remarks of a school employee to the Regional Safety . . . Compl. at ¶¶ 10.15— 10.17. . . .

FIORANELLI, v. CBS BROADCASTING INC. BBC RTW LLC, LLC, LLC, SRL, JVCT IPSE LLC, A E LLC,, 232 F. Supp. 3d 531 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . (quoting Nimmer on Copyright § 10.15)); Marshall v. . . .

CONGREGATION JESHUAT ISRAEL, v. CONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL,, 186 F. Supp. 3d 158 (D.R.I. 2016)

. . . Myers £20.0.0 “for a piece of plate” and £10.15 for “rimonim”). . . .

EBERHARD ARCHITECTS, LLC, v. BOGART ARCHITECTURE, INC., 314 F.R.D. 567 (N.D. Ohio 2016)

. . . James, 144 F.3d 229, 236 (2nd Cir.1998)(citing Nimmer, § 10.15[A] at 10-120). . . .

IN RE BELTWAY ONE DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, N. A. v. LLC,, 547 B.R. 819 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2016)

. . . Specifically, Wells Fargo claimed the value of the property was $10.15 million and therefore, in order . . .

E. SPANN, v. J. C. PENNEY CORPORATION, a, 314 F.R.D. 312 (C.D. Cal. 2016)

. . . maximum benefit of $101.48 — $128.54, while a 20% claim rate would result in benefits ranging from $10.15 . . . They would receive $20.30 with a 5% claim rate, $10.15 with a 10% claim rate, and $5.07 with a 20% claim . . .

IN RE TRANS- INDUSTRIES, INC. J. v. S., 538 B.R. 323 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2015)

. . . Paragraph 10.15 of the Plan provides that “[a]ll provisions of this Plan shall be interpreted and applied . . . And Paragraph 10.15 of the Plan, consistent with ERISA, required all Plan provisions to be “interpreted . . .

IN RE FISKER AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, 128 F. Supp. 3d 814 (D. Del. 2015)

. . . 18) By May 2011, Kleiner Perkins owned a 12.61% equity stake in Fisker Automotive and Ace Strength 10.15% . . . interest” in Fisker Automotive through Ace Strength, a British Virgin Islands corporation which owned 10.15% . . .

BARFIELD, v. SHO- ME POWER ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE,, 309 F.R.D. 491 (W.D. Mo. 2015)

. . . Georgia-Pacific Corp., 119 F.3d 703, 706 (8th Cir.1997) (citing 2 Newberg on Class Actions § 10.15 (3d . . .

SAVANI P. Jr. v. URS PROFESSIONAL SOLUTIONS LLC LLC, LLC, LLC s URS WSMS URS URS, 121 F. Supp. 3d 564 (D.S.C. 2015)

. . . PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, 212 F.R.D. 400, 412 (E.D.Wis.2002) (awarding fee of 30% of $ 10.15 million . . .

TRI COUNTY WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. LABATT USA OPERATING CO. LLC,, 112 F. Supp. 3d 639 (S.D. Ohio 2015)

. . . the appropriate discount rate for Tri County with the NAB Brands is 9.2%, arid without the brands is 10.15% . . .

IN RE OSC LIQUIDATING CORPORATION f k a LLC LLC, v. A G LLC,, 529 B.R. 825 (Bankr. D. Del. 2015)

. . . Urging the Court to apply Delaware law to determine Plaintiffs’ claim, Defendants point to Section 10.15 . . . Since Section 10.15 of the Amended Designation of Rights Agreement specifies Delaware law, the only remaining . . .

SPINELLI, E. v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL LLC, NFL L. P. NFL LLC, NFL LLC, LLC, Us LLC, LLC, LLC, NFL LP, LLC, LP, LLC, LP, Co. LLC, Co. LLC,, 96 F. Supp. 3d 81 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 10.15(A)(5) (2013) (“Failure to pay royalties does not render . . .

COBB THEATRES III, LLC IV, LLC, v. AMC ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, INC. AMC, 101 F. Supp. 3d 1319 (N.D. Ga. 2015)

. . . Kintner, Federal Antitrust Law § 10.15 (2013). . . .

INTERNATIONAL FRANCHISE ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CITY OF SEATTLE,, 97 F. Supp. 3d 1256 (W.D. Wash. 2015)

. . . nocdn=l (San Jose, $10.15; Santa Fe, $10.66; Washington, DC, $11.50; Oakland $12.25; Chicago, $13.00; . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 153 So. 3d 192 (Fla. 2014)

. . . Substance, if a controlled substance is the contraband alleged _ Possession of a Firearm or a 790.23 10.15 . . .

HUSTON v. JOHNSON JOHNSON, 585 F. App'x 165 (4th Cir. 2014)

. . . contentions that: dismissal of the action violates Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and Multi-Dis-trict Litigation Rule 10.15 . . .

MONTALVO v. LT S BENJAMIN RECORDS, INC., 56 F. Supp. 3d 121 (D.P.R. 2014)

. . . Graham, 144 F.3d at 236 (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting 3 NimmeR on Copyright § 10.15[A], . . .

In CAPITAL ONE BANK CREDIT CARD INTEREST RATE LITIGATION, 51 F. Supp. 3d 1316 (N.D. Ga. 2014)

. . . From January 24, 2008 to December 20, 2008, the variable APR for Purchases fluctuated from 10.15% to . . .

In A. LAMENTO, A. v. U. S., 520 B.R. 667 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2014)

. . . Eagle Alethea has continued to work part-time at Giant Eagle (32 hours a week) where she is now paid $10.15 . . . Alethea responded: My gross wage is $10.15 per hour at 32 hours a week. I have two children. . . . But, starting at $10.15 an hour, it is rising at the rate of about 75 cents an hour every year. . . .

In BORGES, B. J M R. J M AG FCS, ACA, AG FCS, FLCA, AG FCS, PCA, v. a a a a LLC, a CWBC, a In B. J M R. J M v. AG FCS, PCA, AG FCS, FLCA, AG FCS, ACA, In B. J M R. J M v. AG FCS, ACA, AG FCS, PCA, AG FCS, FLCA,, 510 B.R. 306 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. 2014)

. . . AGNM’s optional advance analyses in 2009 valued the herd between $9.3 million to $10.15 million. . . .

FLORES E. v. ETHICON, INC. A. M. D. St., 563 F. App'x 266 (4th Cir. 2014)

. . . 2) dismissal violates Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 and Multi-District Litigation Manual Rule 10.15 . . .

J. SCHUMACHER, v. AK STEEL CORP. RET. ACC. PENSION PLAN,, 995 F. Supp. 2d 835 (S.D. Ohio 2014)

. . . (For instance, in Clevenger, the Court awarded 29% of a $35 million settlement fund, or $10.15 million . . .

In SOUTHEASTERN MILK ANTITRUST LITIGATION. LLC v. L. P. LLC,, 739 F.3d 262 (6th Cir. 2014)

. . . Kinter et ah, Federal Antitrust Law § 10.15 (2013). . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 131 So. 3d 720 (Fla. 2013)

. . . 10.1 (Carrying a Concealed Weapon/Firearm); 10.5 (Improper Exhibition of a Firearm/Dangerous Weapon); 10.15 . . . _777.04(1)5.1 Assault 784.011 8.1 Comment This instruction was adopted in 1981 and amended in 2013. 10.15 . . .

DESIGN BASICS, LLC, v. CHELSEA LUMBER CO., 977 F. Supp. 2d 714 (E.D. Mich. 2013)

. . . Nimmer, 3 Nimmer on Copyright § 10.15[A][2]. See also BroadVision, Inc. v. Med. . . .

v., 140 T.C. 294 (T.C. 2013)

. . . 18.38 A70 B: Lot 209 375-040-18-00 14.50 A70 C: Lot 206 375-040-15-00 9.90 A70 D: Lot 203 375-040-14-00 10.15 . . .

E. HIBBERT, v. BELLMAWR PARK MUTUAL HOUSING CORPORATION,, 937 F. Supp. 2d 565 (D.N.J. 2013)

. . . . § 2A:42-10.15 et seq.; (4) violation of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.; (5) violation of the New . . .

In AMR CORPORATION, U. S. v. U. S. AMR EETC AMR EETC v., 485 B.R. 279 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . (See 2011-2 EETC Indenture § 10.15; 2009-1 EETC Indenture § 10.15; 2009-2 Secured Notes Indenture § 13.17 . . .

TRUSTEES OF THE DETROIT CARPENTERS FRINGE BENEFIT FUNDS, v. A. NORDSTROM, d b a, 901 F. Supp. 2d 934 (E.D. Mich. 2012)

. . . A, § 10.15. . . . A, § 10.15(a). . . .

MDC LLC, a L. v. NRG INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC,, 93 So. 3d 1145 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . that the trial court erred in denying its motion with regard to the foreclosure claims because section 10.15 . . . In response, MDC 6 filed a motion to compel arbitration based upon section 10.15. . . . We begin with section 10.15, titled “Mandatory Arbitration.” . . . Lastly, section 10.15(b) concludes with the following acknowledgment: Neither this exercise of self help . . . Analysis By its express language, section 10.15 applies to “[a]ny controversy or claim ... arising out . . .

DAVIS, v. DUNN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., 872 F. Supp. 2d 1291 (N.D. Ala. 2012)

. . . Conley screed 10.70 11.50 Caucasian Jason Evans screed 11.00 11.40 Caucasian Keith Davis rakeman screed 10.15 . . . with Defendant, Plaintiff was initially classified and paid as a rake laborer, at an hourly rate of $10.15 . . . classification from rakeman to screed operator, and simultaneously increased Plaintiff's hourly pay rate from $10.15 . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 95 So. 3d 868 (Fla. 2012)

. . . Aggravated Assault, or Battery or Aggravated Battery, by a Detainee Upon Another Detainee or Upon a Visitor; 10.15 . . . Comment This instruction was adopted in 1981 and was amended in 1995 and September 2005 and 2012. 10.15 . . .

In TC LIQUIDATIONS LLC, L. TC LLC, v. L. TC LLC, v. L. TC LLC, v. L. TC LLC, v., 463 B.R. 257 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . December 13, 1999, defined Tiffen LLC as the “Borrower” under the Saunders Loan, and provides in Section 10.15 . . .

WU, v. PEARSON EDUCATION, INC., 277 F.R.D. 255 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . NIMMER ON COPYRIGHT § 10.15. . . .

CONSERVATION FORCE, v. SALAZAR,, 811 F. Supp. 2d 18 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . Conf. 10.15 (Rev. CoP14); 64 Fed.Reg. at 51,500. . . .

FALCON ENTERPRISES, INC. v. PUBLISHERS SERVICE, INC., 438 F. App'x 579 (9th Cir. 2011)

. . . James, 144 F.3d 229, 236 (2d Cir.1998)); 3 Nimmer on Copyrights § 10.15[A][1]. . . .

In MANULIFE FINANCIAL CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION, 276 F.R.D. 87 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . the decline in Manulife’s common stock price from US$10.93, its opening price on February 27, to US$10.15 . . .

F. GLASER, v. LTD., 772 F. Supp. 2d 573 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . Between July 1 and July 15, The9’s ADS price fell from $10.15 to $8.68. (Id. ¶ 142.) . . .

In LYONDELL CHEMICAL COMPANY,, 445 B.R. 277 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . Thereafter, § 10.15 of the Term Loan Agreement, captioned “Governing Law,” provided: ANY LEGAL ACTION . . . And it asserts that “as set forth in the Exit Facility Documents” (specifically Term Loan Agreement § 10.15 . . . the UBS/Highland litigation.”). .Term Loan Agreement, Highland's Supplemental Exh. 3, at §§ 10.07, 10.15 . . . Highland’s Opposition Br., at ¶ 26 (citing Confirmation Order ¶ 22 and Term Loan Agreement § 10.15). . . .

RUSSIAN ENTERTAINMENT WHOLESALE, INC. d b a St. v. CLOSE- UP INTERNATIONAL, INC. Up v. d b a St. DVD LLC, 767 F. Supp. 2d 392 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . cause of action for breach of contract,’ not copyright infringement.” 144 F.3d at 236 (quoting Nimmer § 10.15 . . .

In ADAK FISHERIES, LLC, LLC, v., 459 B.R. 731 (Bankr. D. Alaska 2010)

. . . a primary fish buyer as defined in AS 16.10.296, or to a cooperative corporation organized under AS 10.15 . . .

WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 48 So. 3d 192 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . information controlled the case and gave instructions based on Florida Standard Criminal Jury Instruction 10.15 . . .

L. GUNTER, v. CHASE BANK USA, N. A., 731 F. Supp. 2d 1238 (S.D. Ala. 2010)

. . . Also according to Chase, based on risk factors unique to the Redds, their base rate was “increased” to 10.15% . . .

SCHMIDT, v. SHAH,, 696 F. Supp. 2d 44 (D.D.C. 2010)

. . . . § 10.15 (“No employer or other person may require an employee or other claimant to enter into any agreement . . .

MINNICK v. CLEARWIRE US, LLC, 683 F. Supp. 2d 1179 (W.D. Wash. 2010)

. . . . (¶¶ 10.1-10.15.) 6. Clearwire was unjustly enriched by collecting ETFs. (¶¶ 11.1-11.5.) 7. . . .

In SCOTT v. U. S. TERI, 417 B.R. 623 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 2009)

. . . owe $34,028.94 for both Educap loans, with varying interest rates starting at 8.15% on $12,572.93 and 10.15% . . .

JAMES a k a v. STATE, 16 So. 3d 322 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . (Crim.) 10.15. . . . Standard Jury Instruction 10.15 labels all crimes under section 790.23, Florida Statutes, as “Felon in . . .

BERGT, v. McDOUGAL LITTELL, a R. R., 661 F. Supp. 2d 916 (N.D. Ill. 2009)

. . . .”); 3-10 Nimmer on Copyright § 10.15[A] (2009) (“[W]hen a license is limited in scope, exploitation . . .

D. WEST, v. AK STEEL CORPORATION RETIREMENT ACCUMULATION PENSION PLAN,, 657 F. Supp. 2d 914 (S.D. Ohio 2009)

. . . (For instance, in Clevenger, the Court awarded 29% of a $35 million settlement fund, or $10.15 million . . .

R. BEZIO, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,, 655 F. Supp. 2d 162 (N.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . Finally, the court also notes that the $10.15 million cash award for former participants of the relevant . . . formulated by experienced counsel in ERISA law, the total value of the settlement is $40.15 million ($10.15 . . . The settlement provides $10.15 million in cash for former plan participants plus structural changes of . . . in relation to the settlement, the court, as previously mentioned, notes that the settlement is for $10.15 . . .

STERLING, M. D. v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INS. CO., 619 F. Supp. 2d 1242 (M.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . cognizable against it because it is not a party to the disability insurance contract (Doc. 59, pp. 8-10.15 . . .

PRYOR, v. UNITED STATES,, 85 Fed. Cl. 97 (Fed. Cl. 2008)

. . . . § 10.15 to support her argument that the Army breached the Settlement Agreement by requiring plaintiff . . . See 20 C.F.R. § 10.15 (“No employer or other person may require an employee or other claimant to enter . . .

WOOD, v. HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT PUBLISHING COMPANY, R. R., 589 F. Supp. 2d 1230 (D. Colo. 2008)

. . . Broadcasting Cos., 538 F.2d 14, 20 (2d Cir.1976))); 3-10 Nimmer on Copyright § 10.15[A] (“[W]hen a license . . . See Jacobsen, 535 F.3d at 1380; 3-10 Nim-mer on Copyright § 10.15[A]. 2. Claims against HMH a. . . .

McCLINTON, v. A. McNEIL,, 615 F. Supp. 2d 1310 (M.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . (Crim.) 10.15 (emphasis added). . . .

JACOBSEN, v. KATZER KAM, 535 F.3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . See, e.g., 3-10 Nimmer on Copyright § 10.15 (“An express (or possibly an implied) condition that a licensee . . .

HINES, v. STATE, 983 So. 2d 721 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . (Crim.) 10.15. . . .

In AMERICAN BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. L. v. LLC, N. A. LP, W., 384 B.R. 66 (Bankr. D. Del. 2008)

. . . (See Servicing Agreement § 10.15.) . . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. SMITHFIELD PACKING CO. INC., 545 F. Supp. 2d 508 (D. Md. 2008)

. . . of her discharge, Rodriguez was working as a packing room line leader on the first shift, earning $10.15 . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES, 953 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 2007)

. . . Aggravated Stalking — Injunction Entered; 8.8 — Aggravated Stalking — Victim Under 16 Years of Age; 10.15 . . . 2006, the Committee filed an amended report revising its proposals with regard to instructions 8.7(b), 10.15 . . . This instruction was adopted in 2000 [765 So.2d 692] and amended in 2007 to incorporate cyberstalking. 10.15 . . .

In AMERICAN BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. L. v. LLC, N. A. LP, W., 362 B.R. 149 (Bankr. D. Del. 2007)

. . . (See Servicing Agreement at § 10.15.) . . .

In MIRANT CORPORATION,, 348 B.R. 725 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2006)

. . . interests as a shareholder far outweigh any participation to which it might be entitled pursuant to Plan § 10.15 . . . transfer of a Class 3 Claim would carry, at most, the right to supplemental distributions under Plan § 10.15 . . . If the BTB were not rejected, the distribution under Plan § 10.15 would be substantial. . . . by a distribution of Mirant stock, one who purchased the right to receive distributions under Plan § 10.15 . . .

In ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP., 342 B.R. 142 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . .13; HVA Facility Credit Agreement (Joint Exh. 26) § 10.13; Century-TCI Facility Credit Agreement § 10.15 . . .

LGS ARCHITECTS, INC. a LGS a v. CONCORDIA HOMES OF NEVADA,, 434 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. 2006)

. . . .”); see also 3 Nimmer & Nimmer, supra, § 10.15[A] (“when a license is limited in scope, exploitation . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. PENA,, 61 M.J. 776 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. 2005)

. . . Air Force Instruction (AFI) 31-205, The Air Force Corrections System, H 10.15 (9 Apr 2001). . . . AFI 31-205, If 10.15. . . .

MADISON RIVER MANAGEMENT COMPANY, v. BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE CORPORATION, a k a BMS,, 387 F. Supp. 2d 521 (M.D.N.C. 2005)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 10.15[A]. . . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 10.15[A]). . . .

BRIGHT- JACOBS, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 386 F. Supp. 2d 1352 (N.D. Ga. 2005)

. . . for all of counsel’s work when 105.95 hours thereof were performed in calendar year 2003, and only 10.15 . . . performed in calendar year 2003 = 105.8 hours x $147.75/hour = $15,631.95 and $153.26 per hour for 10.15 . . . also agrees with the Government that 105.8 hours should be based on the 2003 Consumer Price Index, and 10.15 . . .

TVT RECORDS, TVT v. THE ISLAND DEF JAM MUSIC GROUP, a UMG COHEN,, 412 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 2005)

. . . (internal citations omitted); 3 Nimmer on Copyright § 10.15[A] (6th ed. 1978) (“Rescission may also be . . .

VALVE CORPORATION, a v. SIERRA ENTERTAINMENT INC. a a S. A. a a a v. a, 431 F. Supp. 2d 1091 (W.D. Wash. 2004)

. . . See Nimmer on Copyright § 10.15(A) (“[w]hen a license is limited in scope, exploitation of the copyrighted . . .

G. KRAIMER, Jr. J. s, LLC LLC, v. CITY OF SCHOFIELD,, 342 F. Supp. 2d 807 (W.D. Wis. 2004)

. . . . § 10.15(6); the now repealed ordinance requiring plaintiffs to obtain a Public Entertainment/Exhibition . . . As to § 10.15(6)(g), I conclude that it is constitutional. . . . Fourth, they challenge as overbroad Ord. § 10.15(6), which applies to adult-oriented establishments. . . . §§ 10.15(6)(b)(36) and 10.15(6)(g). . . . Plaintiffs do not suggest that defendant did not have compelling reasons to pass § 10.15(6)(g). . . .

EVOLUTION, INC. v. SUNTRUST BANK,, 342 F. Supp. 2d 943 (D. Kan. 2004)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 10.15[A], at 10-116. . . .

MORRIS, v. STATE, 869 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . (Crim.) 10.15. . . .

G. GROMALA, v. ROYAL SUNALLIANCE,, 87 F. App'x 562 (6th Cir. 2004)

. . . Gromala also looks to plan § 10.15— “[a]ll provisions of this plan shall be interpreted and applied in . . . But § 10.15 speaks to the application and interpretation of plan provisions. . . . Section 10.15 is one of sixteen miscellaneous provisions that set out interpretation aids regarding choice . . . Section 10.15 also provides, beyond what Gromala quoted, that plan provisions control over conflicting . . .

In INFONET SERVICES CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION, 310 F. Supp. 2d 1080 (C.D. Cal. 2003)

. . . The Agreements are attached to Infonet's Registration Statement as Exhibits 10.12, 10.13, 10.14, and 10.15 . . .

In INFONET SERVICES CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION, 310 F. Supp. 2d 1106 (C.D. Cal. 2003)

. . . The Agreements are attached to Infonet’s Registration Statement as Exhibits 10.12, 10.13, 10.14, and 10.15 . . .

IMAGE SOFTWARE, INC. a v. THE REYNOLDS AND REYNOLDS COMPANY,, 273 F. Supp. 2d 1168 (D. Colo. 2003)

. . . See generally 3 Nimmer on Copyright, § 10.15[B] at pp. 10-128—10-130 (Lexis/Nexis 2002)(eiting Saturday . . .

In J. KOSTER, L., 294 B.R. 737 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 2003)

. . . Fairbanks contended that under the note and deed of trust, interest is to accrue at the rate of 10.15% . . .

In PITTSBURGH- CANFIELD CORPORATION, v., 283 B.R. 231 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2002)

. . . prices for gas in December 2000, ranging from Six and 85/100 Dollars ($6.85) to Ten and 15/100 Dollars ($10.15 . . . Defendant's Exhibit O lists four prices paid in December 2000: $6.85, $10.15, $9.12258 and $8.83952. . . . By the Court’s calculations, adding all four of the December prices ($6.85 + $10.15 + $9.12258 + $8.83952 . . .

A. M. CAPEN S CO. INC. v. AMERICAN TRADING AND PRODUCTION CORPORATION,, 200 F. Supp. 2d 34 (D.P.R. 2002)

. . . Tigar, Federal Appeals § 10.15, p. 531 (3d ed.1999)(emphasis added). . . . Tigar & Tigar, Federal Appeals § 10.15, p. 531. . . . . Federal Appeals § 10.15, p. 537. . . . .

FRIENDS AND LOVERS, INC. a v. LIONS GATE FILMS, INC. a a, 56 F. App'x 760 (9th Cir. 2001)

. . . Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright, § 10.15[A] (2000). . . .

FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK N. A. v. UNITED STATES S. G., 164 F. Supp. 2d 660 (E.D. Pa. 2001)

. . . that Casagrande has no entitlement to a jury trial with respect to First Union’s claims against him: 10.15 . . . THE BANK HAS BEEN INDUCED TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT BY, INTER ALIA, THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION 10.15 . . .

PEER INTERNATIONAL CORP. v. LATIN AMERICAN MUSIC CORP., 161 F. Supp. 2d 38 (D.P.R. 2001)

. . . cause of action for breach of contract,” not copyright infringement. 3 NIMMER ON COPYRIGHT, supra, § 10.15 . . . granted so that any further use of the work was without authority.”); 3 NIM-MER ON COPYRIGHT, supra, § 10.15 . . . Nimmer, NIMMER ON COPYRIGHT § 10.15[A], at 10-125-126 (1996) (“Upon such rescission, the assignment or . . .

WEST, v. R. MANSON,, 163 F. Supp. 2d 116 (D. Conn. 2001)

. . . Tegler 11/25/95-4/10/96 10.15 hrs X $200/hr $ 2,030.00 5/10/96-1/14/00 86.30 hrs X $67.50/hr $ 5,825.25 . . .

In LOIS USA, INC. USA USA USA USA v. f k a, 264 B.R. 69 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . claims cannot be considered without considering the potential effect of the Entire Agreement Clause, § 10.15 . . . The Agreement provides, in § 10.15: This Agreement, including all Exhibits, Schedules and other documents . . .

MANGONE, v. FIRST USA BANK,, 206 F.R.D. 222 (S.D. Ill. 2001)

. . . See, e.g., Newberg On Class Actions, § 10.15 (3rd Ed.1992); Wilson v. . . .

B. GLICK K. v. UNITED STATES, 96 F. Supp. 2d 850 (S.D. Ind. 2000)

. . . 1992_1993 ■_ Partnerships $111,300,571 $115,419,009 GBG_$12,681,134_$13,010,769 Percentage of 7.62% to 10.15% . . .

BASSETT, v. MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBE,, 204 F.3d 343 (2d Cir. 2000)

. . . Rotelle, 670 F.2d 1035, 1045 (D.C.Cir.1981), and the reference in Costello to 3 Nimmer § 10.15 (1980 . . . Cf. 3 Nimmer § 10.15[A], at 10-120 to 10-125 (section entitled “Consequences of Violation of Assignment . . .

RT COMPUTER GRAPHICS, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 44 Fed. Cl. 747 (Fed. Cl. 1999)

. . . cause of action for breach of contract,” not copyright infringement. 3 Nimmer on Copyright, supra, § 10.15 . . .

JONES, v. NATIONAL DISTILLERS,, 56 F. Supp. 2d 355 (S.D.N.Y. 1999)

. . . Newberg on Class Actions § 10.15, at 10-38. A. . . .

S. CROOKER, v. MAGAW,, 41 F. Supp. 2d 87 (D. Mass. 1999)

. . . Portugese, 8 x 53Rmm Japanese Murata, 9.5 x 60Rmm Turkish Mauser, 11.5 x 57Rmm Spanish Re-formado, 10.15 . . .