Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 7.40 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 7.40 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 7.40 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 7.40

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
7.40 Madison County.The boundary lines of Madison County are as follows: Beginning at the point where the west boundary line of lot number one hundred forty-three of fifteenth district Georgia fractions intersects with the Georgia state line and run thence due south along the west boundary line of lots numbers one hundred forty-three and one hundred eighty to the southwest corner of lot one hundred eighty; thence easterly along the south line of lot number one hundred eighty to the east line of section twenty-seven, township three north, range seven east; thence due south to the southeast corner of section ten, township two north, range seven east; thence due west to the southwest corner of said section ten; thence due south to the southeast corner of section sixteen, township two north, range seven east; thence due west to the southwest corner of said section sixteen; thence due south to the southeast corner of section twenty, township two north, range seven east; thence due west to the southwest corner of section nineteen, township two north, range seven east; thence due south to the southeast corner of section twenty-five, township two north, range six east; thence due west to the southwest corner of section twenty-six, township two north, range six east; thence due south to the southwest corner of section thirty-five, township two north, range six east; thence due west to the thread of the Big Aucilla river; thence southerly along the thread of said river to the middle line of township two south, range five east, or the north boundary line of Taylor County; thence east, concurrent with the north boundary line of Taylor County, on said middle township line to the range line dividing ranges eight and nine east; thence south on said range line to the township line dividing townships two and three south; thence east on said township line to the range line dividing ranges nine and ten east, or the northwest corner of Lafayette County; thence east, concurrent with the north boundary line of Lafayette County, on said township line to the thread of the Suwannee River; thence north and easterly, concurrent with the west boundary line of Suwannee County, along the thread of said Suwannee River to where it joins the thread of the Withlacoochee River; thence northerly, concurrent with the west boundary line of Hamilton County, along the thread of the said Withlacoochee River to the boundary line between the States of Georgia and Florida; thence west along said boundary line to the place of beginning.
History.s. 1, Dec. 26, 1827; s. 11, Nov. 23, 1828; s. 1, Feb. 5, 1844; s. 1, ch. 806, 1856; RS 24; GS 22; RGS 24; s. 1, ch. 9361, 1923; CGL 26.

F.S. 7.40 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.40 on CourtListener

Amendments to 7.40


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.40

Total Results: 4  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Monsanto Co. v. Campuzano, 206 F. Supp. 2d 1252 (S.D. Fla. 2002).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16341, 2002 WL 1292000

...[2] The legal obligations cited by Merisant include 21 C.F.R. Part 110 (including specifically, sub-parts A, B, C, E, and G). entitled "Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing, Packing or Holding Human Food"; 21 C.F.R. Part 7, sub-part C. § 7.40 et seq....
Copy

Monsanto Co. v. Campuzano, 206 F. Supp. 2d 1239 (S.D. Fla. 2002).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2002 WL 1291995

...[4] The legal obligations cited by Merisant include 21 C.F.R. Part 110 (including specifically, sub-parts A, B, C, E, and G, entitled "Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing, Packing or Holding Human Food"); 21 C.F.R. Part 7, sub-part C, § 7.40 et seq....
Copy

Winner v. Cataldo, 559 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2437, 1990 WL 40340

...ly chosen: “The test ... that the action was brought without reasonable cause is appropriate to deter strike suits on the one hand, and on the other hand to protect plaintiffs whose suits have a reasonable foundation.” 2 Model Bus.Corp. Act Ann. § 7.40, at 720....
Copy

H.B. Holding Co. v. Girtman, 96 So. 2d 781 (Fla. 1957).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3585

Orman v. Day, 5 Fla. 385; 69 C.J.S. Party Walls § 7; 40 Am.Jur., Party Walls, Sec. 7. In Nabers v. Wise

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.