Florida Statute 7.15 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

7.15 Dixie County.—The boundary lines of Dixie County are as follows: Beginning at a point where township line between townships seven and eight south, intersects the Suwannee River, thence southerly down the thread of the main stream of said Suwannee River to the Gulf of America; thence along said Gulf of America, including the waters of said gulf within the jurisdiction of the State of Florida, to the mouth of the Steinhatchee River; thence northerly along the thread of the said Steinhatchee River to the point where it is intersected by the section line between sections fifteen and sixteen, in township eight, south of range ten east; thence north on said section line and other sections to the township line between townships seven and eight south; thence east on said township line dividing townships seven and eight south, to the point of beginning.

History.—s. 1, ch. 8514, 1921; CGL 69; s. 5, ch. 2025-8.

F.S. 7.15 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.15 on CourtListener

Amendments to 7.15

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.15

Total Results: 12 | Sort by: Relevance | Newest First

Copy

Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp., 123 F.3d 1353 (11th Cir. 1997).

Cited 668 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 38 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1494, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 26389, 1997 WL 568682

...a return of the purchase price, or damages, in which the buyer stands on the transaction and seeks damages for the difference between the value of the product as represented and its actual value at the time of purchase. See generally 2 Fowler V. Harper et al., The Law of Torts § 7.15 (2d ed.1986)....

Copy

Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp., 123 F.3d 1353 (11th Cir. 1997).

Cited 163 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Copy

Kovach v. McLellan, 564 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 103139

...[2] However, a stronger and more clearly articulated defense and cause of action in this case is fraud and deceit. Without question fraud and deceit can be valid defenses in a mortgage foreclosure suit, where as here, the McLellans are not holders in due course. [3] Harper, James and Gray, Law of Torts, Vol. II, § 7.15 (2d ed)....

Copy

Leopold v. Kimball Hill Homes Florida, Inc., 842 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1116, 2003 WL 239240

Larry R. Leiby, Florida Construction Law Manual, § 7:15 (4th ed.2001). The fact that the Stratmon V plans

Copy

Nunez v. Geico Gen. Ins., 117 So. 3d 388 (Fla. 2013).

Cited 3 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 440, 2013 WL 3214401, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1315

No-Fault Law: Personal Injury Protection (PIP) § 7:15 (2011-12 ed.). . Geico attempts to distinguish

Copy

Hinnant v. Am. Nat. Bank & Trust Co., 406 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

court reasoned that the primary purpose of Section 7 (15 U.S.C. §§ 78g) was protection of the economy

Copy

Abdoney v. York, 903 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6952, 2005 WL 1125054

property.” Grant S. Nelson, Real Estate Finance Law, § 7.15, at 573 (4th ed. 2001). The lien of the senior

Copy

Ballantrae Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 203 So. 3d 938 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13268

S. Nelson, Real Estate Finance Law, § 7.15, at 573 (4th ed.2001)). Here, the servicers

Copy

Hinnant v. Am. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. of Ft. Lauderdale, 406 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21740

court reasoned that the primary purpose of Section 7 (15 U.S.C. §§ 78g) was protection of the economy

Copy

In re Complaint of Twenty Grand Offshore, Inc., 328 F. Supp. 1385 (S.D. Fla. 1971).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13132

According to Gilmore & Black, The Law of Admiralty § 7-15, the operators of tugboats have long sought to

Copy

Merly Nunez v. Geico Gen. Ins. Co., 726 F.3d 1231 (11th Cir. 2013).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2013 WL 4018601, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 16379

No-Fault Law: Personal Injury Protection (PIP) § 7:15 (2011-12 ed.). . Geico attempts to distinguish

Copy

Home Owners Ins. v. Charles Sales Corp., 222 So. 2d 37 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5753

88, 78 L.Ed. 577 (1933); Sterns on Suretyship, § 7.15, page 218 (5th ed. 1951). Appellant presents an

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.