Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.987 - MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF | Syfert Law

Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.987

RULE 3.987. MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF

MODEL FORM FOR USE IN MOTIONS FOR
POSTCONVICTION RELIEF PURSUANT TO
FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.850

In the Circuit Court of the
Judicial Circuit,
in and for
County, Florida


State of Florida, )
)
v. ) Criminal Division
)
) Case No.:
(your name) ) (the original case
number)
)
)

MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF
Instructions — Read Carefully

(1) This motion must be typewritten or hand-written in
legible printed lettering, in blue or black ink, double-spaced, with
margins no less than 1 inch on white 8 1/2 by 11 inch paper. No
motion, including any memorandum of law, shall exceed 50 pages
without leave of the court upon a showing of good cause. Any false
statement of a material fact may serve as the basis for prosecution
and conviction for perjury. All questions must be answered
concisely in the proper space on the form.

(2) Additional pages are not permitted except with respect to
the facts that you rely upon to support your grounds for relief. No
citation of authorities need be furnished. If briefs or arguments are
submitted in support of your legal claims (as opposed to your
factual claims), they should be submitted in the form of a separate
memorandum of law. This memorandum should have the same
caption as this motion.

(3) No filing fee is required when submitting a motion for
postconviction relief.

(4) Only the judgment of one case may be challenged in a
single motion for postconviction relief. If you seek to challenge
judgments entered in different cases, or different courts, you must
file separate motions as to each such case. The single exception to
this is if you are challenging the judgments in the different cases
that were consolidated for trial. In this event, show each case
number involved in the caption.

(5) Your attention is directed to the fact that you must
include all grounds for relief, and all facts that support such
grounds, in the motion you file seeking relief from any judgment of
conviction.

(6) Claims of newly discovered evidence must be supported
by affidavits attached to your motion. If your newly discovered
evidence claim is based on recanted trial testimony or a newly
discovered witness, the attached affidavit must be from that
witness. For all other newly discovered evidence claims, the
attached affidavit must be from any person whose testimony is
necessary to factually support your claim for relief. If the required
affidavit is not attached to your motion, you must provide an
explanation why the required affidavit could not be obtained.

(7) Your motion must include an oath, under penalties of
perjury, that contains the following:

(a) that you have read the motion or that it has been
read to you;

(b) that you understand the contents of the motion;
and
(c) that all of the facts stated in the motion are true
and correct.

(8) You must also certify, under the threat of sanctions, the
following:

(a) that the motion is being filed in good faith and with
a reasonable belief that it is timely filed;

(b) that the motion has potential merit;

(c) that this motion does not duplicate previous
motions that have been disposed of by the court; and

(d) that you understand English, or if you cannot
understand English, that you have had the motion translated
completely into a language that you do understand, along with the
name and address of the person who translated the motion and a
certification from that person that he or she provided you with an
accurate and complete translation.

(9) When the motion is fully completed, the original must be
mailed to the clerk of the court whose address is (county
where sentence was imposed) County Courthouse, (address
of clerk), or filed through the Florida Courts E-filing Portal, as
stated in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420.

MOTION

1. Name and location of the court that entered the judgment of
conviction under attack:




2. Date of judgment of conviction:

3. Length of sentence:
4. Nature of offense(s) involved (all counts):




5. What was your plea? (check only one)


(a) Not guilty


(b) Guilty


(c) Nolo contendere


(d) Not guilty by reason of insanity

If you entered one plea to one count and a different plea to another
count, give details:




6. Kind of trial: (check only one)

(a) Jury

(b) Judge only without jury

7. Did you testify at the trial or at any pretrial hearing?
Yes No

If yes, list each such occasion:



8. Did you appeal from the judgment of conviction?

Yes No

9. If you did appeal, answer the following:

(a) Name of court:

(b) Result:

(c) Date of result:

(d) Citation (if known):

10. Other than a direct appeal from the judgment of conviction
and sentence, have you previously filed any petitions, applications,
motions, etc., with respect to this judgment in this court?

Yes No

11. If your answer to number 10 was “yes,” give the following
information (applies only to proceedings in this court):

(a) (1) Nature of the proceeding:



(2) Grounds raised:




(3) Did you receive an evidentiary hearing on your
petition, application, motion, etc.?
Yes No

(4) Result:

(5) Date of result:

(b) As to any second petition, application, motion, etc., give
the same information:

(1) Nature of the proceeding:



(2) Grounds raised:




(3) Did you receive an evidentiary hearing on your
petition, application, motion, etc.?

Yes No

(4) Result:

(5) Date of result:

12. Other than a direct appeal from the judgment of conviction
and sentence, have you previously filed any petitions, applications,
motions, etc., with respect to this judgment in any other court?

Yes No

13. If your answer to number 12 was “yes,” give the following
information:

(a) (1) Name of court:

(2) Nature of the proceeding:
(3) Grounds raised:




(4) Did you receive an evidentiary hearing on your
petition, application, motion, etc.?

Yes No

(5) Result:

(6) Date of result:

(b) As to any second petition, application, motion, etc., give
the same information:

(1) Name of court:

(2) Nature of the proceeding:




(3) Grounds raised:




(4) Did you receive an evidentiary hearing on your
petition, application, motion, etc.?

Yes No
(5) Result:

(6) Date of result:

(c) As to any third petition, application, motion, etc., give the
same information:

(1) Name of court:

(2) Nature of the proceeding:




(3) Grounds raised:




(4) Did you receive an evidentiary hearing on your
petition, application, motion, etc.?

Yes No

(5) Result:

(6) Date of result:

14. State concisely every ground on which you claim that the
judgment or sentence is unlawful. Summarize briefly the facts
supporting each ground. If necessary, you may attach pages stating
additional grounds and the facts supporting them.

For your information, the following is a list of the most frequently
raised grounds for postconviction relief. Each statement preceded
by a letter constitutes a separate ground for possible relief. You may
raise any grounds that you may have other than those listed.
However, you should raise in this motion all available grounds
(relating to this conviction) on which you base your allegations that
your conviction or sentence is unlawful.

DO NOT CHECK ANY OF THESE LISTED GROUNDS. If you select
one or more of these grounds for relief, you must allege facts. The
motion will not be accepted by the court if you merely check (a)
through (i).

(a) Conviction obtained by plea of guilty or nolo contendere
that was unlawfully induced or not made voluntarily with
understanding of the nature of the charge and the consequences of
the plea.

(b) Conviction obtained by the unconstitutional failure of the
prosecution to disclose to the defendant evidence favorable to the
defendant.

(c) Conviction obtained by a violation of the protection
against double jeopardy.

(d) Denial of effective assistance of counsel.

(e) Denial of right of appeal.

(f) Lack of jurisdiction of the court to enter the judgment or
impose sentence (such as an unconstitutional statute).

(g) Sentence in excess of the maximum authorized by law.

(h) Newly discovered evidence.

(i) Changes in the law that would be retroactive.

A. Ground 1:



Supporting FACTS (tell your story briefly without citing cases
or law):
B. Ground 2:



Supporting FACTS (tell your story briefly without citing cases
or law):




C. Ground 3:



Supporting FACTS (tell your story briefly without citing cases
or law):
D. Ground 4:



Supporting FACTS (tell your story briefly without citing cases
or law):




15. If any of the grounds listed in 14 A, B, C, and D were not
previously presented on your direct appeal, state briefly what
grounds were not so presented and give your reasons they were not
so presented:
16. Do you have any petition, application, appeal, motion, etc.,
now pending in any court, either state or federal, as to the
judgment under attack?

Yes No

17. If your answer to number 16 was “yes,” give the following
information:

(a) Name of court:

(b) Nature of the proceeding:

(c) Grounds raised:




(d) Status of the proceedings:



18. Give the name and address, if known, of each attorney who
represented you in the following stages of the judgment attacked
herein.

(a) At preliminary hearing:
(b) At arraignment and plea:



(c) At trial:



(d) At sentencing:



(e) On appeal:



(f) In any postconviction proceeding:



(g) On appeal from any adverse ruling in a postconviction
proceeding:



WHEREFORE, movant requests that the court grant all relief
to which the movant may be entitled in this proceeding, including
but not limited to (here list the nature of the relief sought):

1.
2. Such other and further relief as the court deems just and
proper.

OATH

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing
motion, or had it read to me, that I understand the motion’s
content, and that all of the facts alleged in the motion are true and
correct.



/s/
Name
DC#

Certifications and Acknowledgment

I certify that the motion is filed in good faith, that I have a
reasonable belief that the motion is timely filed, has potential
merit, and does not duplicate previous motions that have been
disposed of by the court.
I certify that [choose one]
I understand English and have read the foregoing
motion, or had the motion read to me; or
I cannot understand English and the foregoing
motion was translated completely into a language that I
understand and read to me by .....(name).....,whose address is
.....(address)....., and whose certification of an accurate and
complete translation is attached to this motion.
I understand that I am subject to judicial or administrative
sanctions, including but not limited to forfeiture of gain time, if
this motion is found to be frivolous, malicious, made in bad
faith or with reckless disregard for the truth, or an abuse of the
legal process.


/s/
Name
DC#


Certificate of Mailing
(Must use Certificate of Mailing OR Certificate of Service)

I certify that I placed this document in the hands of . . . .
.(here insert name of institution official). . . . . for mailing to . . . .
.(here insert name or names and addresses used for service). . . . .
on . . . . .(date). . . . . .

/s/
Name
Address
DC#

Certificate of Service
(Must use Certificate of Mailing OR Certificate of Service)

I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to . . .
. .(here insert name or names, addresses used for service and
mailing addresses). . . . . by (e-mail) (delivery) (mail) (fax) on . . . .
.(date). . . . . .

/s/
Attorney
Certificate of an Accurate and Complete Translation
(To be used if translation of the motion was necessary.)

I certify that a complete and accurate translation of this
motion was provided to the Defendant in this case on . . . . .(date). .
....


/s/
Name
Address
DC#

Cases Citing Rule 3.987

Total Results: 75

Spera v. State

971 So. 2d 754, 2007 WL 3196507

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2007 | Docket: 1405332

Cited 496 times | Published

help defendants file their motions. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987. This form explains that the defendant must

Category: Criminal Procedure

Michael Alan Hurley v. Michael W. Moore, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General of the State of Florida

233 F.3d 1295

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 4, 2000 | Docket: 143401

Cited 90 times | Published

required by Florida law. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987. See also Gorham v. State, 494

Category: Criminal Procedure

Scott v. State

464 So. 2d 1171, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 47

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 1985 | Docket: 2526177

Cited 33 times | Published

_ (your signature) Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.987; In re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Shearer

628 So. 2d 1102, 1993 WL 494434

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1993 | Docket: 1250374

Cited 20 times | Published

PLACE OF THE NOTARY SIGNATURE REQUIREMENT OF RULE 3.987? We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Marriott v. State

605 So. 2d 985, 1992 WL 260808

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1992 | Docket: 1437748

Cited 15 times | Published

mandatory $100,000 fine. Appellant pro se filed a Rule 3.987 Motion for Post Conviction Relief (the form motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gorham v. State

494 So. 2d 211, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 484

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1986 | Docket: 1510823

Cited 15 times | Published

under review here was not in the form required by rule 3.987 and Scott, and, therefore, the petition was properly

Category: Criminal Procedure

Billy Leon Kearse v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

736 F.3d 1359, 2013 WL 6225032, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 23971

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 2, 2013 | Docket: 44555

Cited 14 times | Published

not pointed to any case law interpreting Florida Rule 3.987 to require either a staple or pagination

Category: Criminal Procedure

Crain v. State

914 So. 2d 1015, 2005 WL 3076606

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2005 | Docket: 1781519

Cited 14 times | Published

to accomplish their purpose, they amended the Rule 3.987 form. Finally, in Judge Torpy's concurring opinion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carr v. State

495 So. 2d 282, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2110

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 1986 | Docket: 2578845

Cited 13 times | Published

of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and the forms at Rule 3.987, are designed to assist pro se filings without

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carr v. State

495 So. 2d 282, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2110

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 1986 | Docket: 2578845

Cited 13 times | Published

of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and the forms at Rule 3.987, are designed to assist pro se filings without

Category: Criminal Procedure

Demps v. State

696 So. 2d 1296, 1997 WL 394873

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1997 | Docket: 1326011

Cited 12 times | Published

postconviction relief under rule 3.850.[3]See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987. The state does not dispute Demps' assertion

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Rodriguez

523 So. 2d 1141, 1988 WL 36949

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1988 | Docket: 1517220

Cited 10 times | Published

been added to the standard oath (see the form in rule 3.987, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure), the Court

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.

606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1992 | Docket: 2191048

Cited 9 times | Published

Notes 1972 Amendment. Same as prior rule. *344 RULE 3.987. MOTION FOR POST-CONVICTIONPOSTCONVICTION RELIEF

Category: Criminal Procedure

Crosley Alexander Green v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

877 F.3d 1244

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 15, 2017 | Docket: 6242540

Cited 8 times | Published

issued on September 15, 2010. 2 . Rule 3.987 gives instructions for filing Rule 3.850 motions

Category: Criminal Procedure

JSL Const. Co. v. Levy

994 So. 2d 394, 2008 WL 4643302

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2008 | Docket: 2518600

Cited 6 times | Published

authorized by section 92.525); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987 (recognizing two types of oaths, a notarized

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jimenez v. Ratine

954 So. 2d 706, 2007 WL 1159703

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2007 | Docket: 1652193

Cited 4 times | Published

must be sworn rely on this statute. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987. Accordingly, the circuit court erred in

Category: Criminal Procedure

Armey v. State

880 So. 2d 1269, 2004 WL 1932759

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2004 | Docket: 2569935

Cited 4 times | Published

notarized oath or an unnotarized oath. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987. Under either alternative, the motion is

Category: Criminal Procedure

McFadden v. State

711 So. 2d 1350, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1495

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1998 | Docket: 2590088

Cited 4 times | Published

of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and the forms at Rule 3.987, are designed to assist pro se filings without

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dowling v. State

545 So. 2d 521, 1989 WL 72747

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1989 | Docket: 1344826

Cited 4 times | Published

presently were not raised in prior proceedings. See Rule 3.987, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (model form)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sugar v. State

655 So. 2d 1271, 1995 WL 331456

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1995 | Docket: 295561

Cited 3 times | Published

Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.987. Accordingly, the motion was legally insufficient

Category: Criminal Procedure

Love v. State

623 So. 2d 1221, 1993 WL 347573

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1993 | Docket: 1183543

Cited 3 times | Published

required by rule 3.850, in the format prescribed by rule 3.987. Therefore, we affirm without reaching the merits

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rivet v. State

618 So. 2d 377, 1993 WL 177735

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1993 | Docket: 1720294

Cited 3 times | Published

aid of counsel. The model form promulgated by rule 3.987 was designed to be used in proceedings held in

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ketion v. State

548 So. 2d 778, 1989 WL 101068

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 1989 | Docket: 1333734

Cited 3 times | Published

be provided to the trial court, see also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.987 (model form for Rule 3.850 motions). Failure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Scott v. State

364 So. 2d 67

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1978 | Docket: 461736

Cited 3 times | Published

*68 designed for the unrepresented.[1] Indeed, Rule 3.987 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ghent v. State

27 So. 3d 121, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 141, 2010 WL 99121

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 2010 | Docket: 1664932

Cited 2 times | Published

motion for postconviction relief." See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987 (2006). Ghent's sole ground for seeking

Category: Criminal Procedure

Welch v. State

946 So. 2d 649, 2007 WL 188297

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 2007 | Docket: 260880

Cited 2 times | Published

oath and a line for Welch's signature. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987; State v. Shearer, 628 So.2d 1102, 1103

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ruiz v. State

908 So. 2d 508, 2005 WL 1412102

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 2005 | Docket: 1724870

Cited 2 times | Published

So.2d 593 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997);[1]see Shearer (rule 3.987 form of oath requiring notary satisfied by section

Category: Criminal Procedure

Weisman v. State

651 So. 2d 148, 1995 WL 59666

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 1995 | Docket: 35472

Cited 2 times | Published

the motion was not filed "under oath." See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.987. The trial court denied relief without an

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

637 So. 2d 999, 1994 WL 244473

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 1994 | Docket: 422918

Cited 2 times | Published

attached memorandum were not made under oath. Rule 3.987 prescribes an appropriate form of motion that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Catlett v. State

367 So. 2d 735

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 1979 | Docket: 2589406

Cited 2 times | Published

emphasized in Scott, supra, the recently adopted Rule 3.987, Fla.R. Cr.P., provides a complete fill-in-the-blanks

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dumel v. State

183 So. 3d 476, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 700, 2016 WL 231809

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 2016 | Docket: 3029450

Cited 1 times | Published

and that the facts stated in it are true. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.987(1). A defendant’s failure to comply with

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

185 So. 3d 1169

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2015 | Docket: 60294128

Cited 1 times | Published

Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171, 1172 (Fla.1985). Rule 3.987 (Motion for. Postconviction Relief) is amended

Category: Criminal Procedure

Al-Hakim v. State

87 So. 3d 836, 2012 WL 1698769, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7831

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2012 | Docket: 60308061

Cited 1 times | Published

of which was submitted on the form included in rule 3.987, was not double-spaced. We reverse and remand

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nwajei v. State

964 So. 2d 887, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15147, 2007 WL 2781696

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2007 | Docket: 64852462

Cited 1 times | Published

as required by rule 3.850(c). See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987 (providing two forms of the oath for use

Category: Criminal Procedure

Theoc v. State

832 So. 2d 261, 2002 WL 31757632

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2002 | Docket: 302472

Cited 1 times | Published

notarized oath, or an unnotarized oath. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987. Under either alternative, the motion is

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dixon v. State

678 So. 2d 530, 1996 WL 496303

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1996 | Docket: 2572202

Cited 1 times | Published

Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla.1985); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987. Accordingly, the motion was legally insufficient

Category: Criminal Procedure

Swain v. State

355 So. 2d 865

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1978 | Docket: 1475394

Cited 1 times | Published

3.850 has been recently amended and that Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.987 now provides a model form for a Motion for

Category: Criminal Procedure

JEFFERY C. GREEN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2023 | Docket: 68003692

Published

true.” Shearer, 628 So. 2d at 1103–04 (amending rule 3.987 to provide the prescribed oath for unnotarized

Category: Criminal Procedure

JONATHAN NEELEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2022 | Docket: 64952880

Published

place of the notary signature requirement of rule 3.987?” Id. at 1102. The court answered in the affirmative

Category: Criminal Procedure

Crosley Alexander Green v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 14, 2022 | Docket: 63157479

Published

January 7 motion failed to comply with Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.987 and instructed Green to file a corrected

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2021 | Docket: 59974792

Published

310 So. 3d 374 (Fla. 2021). Finally, rule 3.987 (Motion for Postconviction Relief) is amended

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure – Corrected Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2016 | Docket: 3037340

Published

State, 464 So. 2d 1171, 1172 (Fla. 1985). Rule 3.987 (Motion for Postconviction Relief) is amended

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure - Corrected Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2016 | Docket: 3029855

Published

State, 464 So. 2d 1171, 1172 (Fla. 1985). Rule 3.987 (Motion for Postconviction Relief) is amended

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

185 So. 3d 1169, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 593, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2948, 2015 WL 10490031

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2015 | Docket: 3008265

Published

State, 464 So. 2d 1171, 1172 (Fla. 1985). Rule 3.987 (Motion for Postconviction Relief) is amended

Category: Criminal Procedure

Campbell v. State

115 So. 3d 434, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9327, 2013 WL 2501977

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2013 | Docket: 60232185

Published

that oath that was virtually identical to the rule 3.987 form oath rendered postconviction motion procedurally

Category: Criminal Procedure

Logan v. State

115 So. 3d 1045, 2013 WL 2420389, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8843

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2013 | Docket: 60232061

Published

2d 86, 86 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987 (providing two forms of the oath for use

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ramkhalawan v. State

50 So. 3d 1241, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 541, 2011 WL 222209

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 2011 | Docket: 60297274

Published

requirements of rule 3.850 and the model form of rule 3.987, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure. The trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Blanche v. State

945 So. 2d 571, 2006 WL 3543580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2006 | Docket: 1725422

Published

required by rule 3.850(c). See *572 also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987 (providing two forms of the oath for use

Category: Criminal Procedure

Murray v. State

917 So. 2d 989, 2005 WL 3536106

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 2005 | Docket: 1158201

Published

motion containing the proper oath. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987. Affirmed.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Desouza v. State

874 So. 2d 729, 2004 WL 1254009

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2004 | Docket: 1200617

Published

relief "shall be under oath ..."); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987 (providing pro se defendants with a model

Category: Criminal Procedure

Riley v. State

866 So. 2d 779, 2004 WL 398979

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2004 | Docket: 290756

Published

So.2d 1007 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987. We will give Riley one last chance to file

Category: Criminal Procedure

Airall v. State

852 So. 2d 329, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11749, 2003 WL 21800806

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2003 | Docket: 64824372

Published

consider Airall’s properly filed motion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987. GUNTHER, SHAHOOD and MAY, JJ., concur.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fordham v. State

853 So. 2d 506, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11577, 2003 WL 21766535

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2003 | Docket: 64824712

Published

its order, the trial court advised Fordham that rule 3.987 provides a model form for use in motions for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Velez v. State

778 So. 2d 480, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1807, 2001 WL 166707

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2001 | Docket: 64803792

Published

asserted that the motion was not in compliance with rule 3.987(4), which provides that “[o]nly the judgment

Category: Criminal Procedure

Michael Alan Hurley v. Michael W. Moore

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 17, 2000 | Docket: 212500

Published

written oath required by Florida law. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987. See also Gorham v. State, 494 So.2d 211

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

794 So. 2d 457, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2556, 2000 WL 1637548

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2000 | Docket: 64808411

Published

State, 321 So.2d 453, 458 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). RULE 3.987. MOTION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF MODEL FORM

Category: Criminal Procedure

McGraw v. State

758 So. 2d 1171, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5240, 2000 WL 525953

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2000 | Docket: 64797560

Published

motion that includes a proper oath. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987. FARMER, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur

Category: Criminal Procedure

Braden v. State

779 So. 2d 365, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4989, 2000 WL 502240

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2000 | Docket: 64804127

Published

form oath contained in rule 3.987. It complies with the requirements of rule 3.987. The fact that the notary

Category: Criminal Procedure

Chamberlain v. State

746 So. 2d 1189, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16554, 1999 WL 1115454

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1999 | Docket: 64792965

Published

as outlined in the state’s response. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 3.987. DELL, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Flagg v. State

733 So. 2d 1118, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6806, 1999 WL 333255

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1999 | Docket: 64788475

Published

this point. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850; Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987; Peavy v. State, 599 So.2d 234 (Fla. 1st

Category: Criminal Procedure

Palmore v. State

735 So. 2d 521, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5797, 1999 WL 279519

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1999 | Docket: 64788861

Published

Shearer, 628 So.2d 1102 (Fla.1993). See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987. The trial court dismissed the motion without

Category: Criminal Procedure

Higgins v. State

724 So. 2d 715, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 673, 1999 WL 31143

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1999 | Docket: 64785620

Published

filing a proper 3.850 motion that conforms with rule 3.987. Brown v. State, 661 So.2d 95 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tyler v. State

722 So. 2d 970, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 71, 1999 WL 2800

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 1999 | Docket: 64785019

Published

2d 95, 96 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); see also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.987. STONE, C.J., and FARMER and GROSS, JJ.,

Category: Criminal Procedure

White v. State

702 So. 2d 1328, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13655, 1997 WL 756674

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1997 | Docket: 64777405

Published

represented by counsel does not excuse the omissions. Rule 3.987 provides a form that enables pro se litigants

Category: Criminal Procedure

Walker v. State

701 So. 2d 668, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13279, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2689

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1997 | Docket: 64776804

Published

were duly verified pursuant to rule 3.850 and rule 3.987, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and- that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Keene v. Nudera

661 So. 2d 40, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5404, 1995 WL 302297

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1995 | Docket: 64759145

Published

State v. Shearer, 628 So.2d 1102 (Fla.1993); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.987. It is apparent from Mr. Solomon’s presentation

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rangel v. State

644 So. 2d 616, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11162, 1994 WL 645475

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1994 | Docket: 64751824

Published

Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla.1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.987. Accordingly, the motion was legally insufficient

Category: Criminal Procedure

Green v. State

635 So. 2d 159, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3918, 1994 WL 156719

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1994 | Docket: 64747706

Published

the appropriate oath and notary seal. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.987. We affirm the denial, with prejudice, of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Green v. State

635 So. 2d 159, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3918, 1994 WL 156719

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1994 | Docket: 64747706

Published

the appropriate oath and notary seal. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.987. We affirm the denial, with prejudice, of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Henegar v. State

635 So. 2d 990, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3544, 1994 WL 133527

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 1994 | Docket: 64747901

Published

meet the “personal knowledge” requirement of rule 3.987, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. In the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.133, 3.692, 3.986, 3.987 & 3.989

630 So. 2d 552, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 6, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 2000, 1993 WL 542380

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1993 | Docket: 64745829

Published

to collect the amount due. The amendments to rule 3.987, Form for Motion for Posteonviction Relief, revise

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gill v. State

622 So. 2d 604, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8390, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1789

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1993 | Docket: 64698170

Published

all of these facts are true and correct." See Rule 3.987, Fla. R.Crim.P.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Shearer v. State

617 So. 2d 721, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2401, 1993 WL 55979

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1993 | Docket: 64695862

Published

authorized to administer an oath.” The oath in the Rule 3.987 states, Before me, the undersigned authority

Category: Criminal Procedure

Warren v. State

504 So. 2d 1371, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 934, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7490

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 1987 | Docket: 64626220

Published

Rule 3.850 utilize the model form set out at Rule 3.987, the use of the model form will generally help

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lawrence v. State

404 So. 2d 1129, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21419

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1981 | Docket: 64585578

Published

consisted of Lawrence’s form motion, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.987, his attached affidavit, and a form order

Category: Criminal Procedure