Cases Citing Rule 3.853
Total Results: 247
679 F.3d 1257, 2012 WL 1579489, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 9325
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 8, 2012 | Docket: 753889
Cited 93 times | Published
Testing," pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853 and Fla. Stat. § 925.11. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853 specifically governs
Category: Criminal Procedure
27 So. 3d 11, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 64, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 62, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 64
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2010 | Docket: 1665077
Cited 41 times | Published
Johnston at trial violated the constitution.
[2] Rule 3.853 originally contained a deadline for filing motions
Category: Criminal Procedure
808 So. 2d 1237, 2002 WL 54414
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2002 | Docket: 1738455
Cited 40 times | Published
failure to adhere to the procedural requirements of rule 3.853. King filed an amended motion on January 11,
Category: Criminal Procedure
976 So. 2d 536, 2007 WL 4191990
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2007 | Docket: 2518715
Cited 35 times | Published
See art. V, § 3(b)(1), (9), Fla. Const; Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Overton
Category: Criminal Procedure
865 So. 2d 1259, 2004 WL 170362
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2004 | Docket: 58859
Cited 32 times | Published
of acquittal or a lesser sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(b)(1)-(6); Hitchcock v. State, 866 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
931 So. 2d 807, 2006 WL 948173
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2006 | Docket: 2518752
Cited 27 times | Published
remand, Lott filed a motion for DNA testing under rule 3.853. He claimed that genetic material from the crime
Category: Criminal Procedure
866 So. 2d 23, 2003 WL 23162540
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 2004 | Docket: 1273947
Cited 27 times | Published
Procedure Creating Rule 3.853 (DNA Testing), 807 So.2d 633 (Fla.2001). Under rule 3.853, a motion for postconviction
Category: Criminal Procedure
841 So. 2d 409, 2003 WL 124508
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2003 | Docket: 413079
Cited 23 times | Published
pursuant to the mandates of section 925.11 and rule 3.853.
We find Cole's tenth claim, that Cole should
Category: Criminal Procedure
967 So. 2d 131, 2007 WL 1836848
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 2007 | Docket: 1733550
Cited 19 times | Published
defendant for that crime. . . .
See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853. Further, in Hitchcock, 866 So.2d at 27
Category: Criminal Procedure
872 So. 2d 230, 2003 WL 22304578
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2004 | Docket: 1356912
Cited 19 times | Published
See § 925.11(2)(f), Fla. Stat. (2002); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853; see also King v. State, 808 So.2d 1237
Category: Criminal Procedure
530 F.3d 1335, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 12912, 2008 WL 2445763
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 19, 2008 | Docket: 922096
Cited 18 times | Published
prosecuting authority." Rule 3.853(c)(8); § 925.11(2)(i). Thus, a Rule 3.853 proceeding involves an application
Category: Criminal Procedure
916 So. 2d 728, 2005 WL 2456006
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2005 | Docket: 2452077
Cited 18 times | Published
to Fla. Rules of Criminal Procedure Creating Rule 3.853, 807 So.2d 633, 636 (Fla.2001) (Anstead, J.,
Category: Criminal Procedure
820 So. 2d 1059, 2002 WL 1466525
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2002 | Docket: 112002
Cited 18 times | Published
in her identification of him as her assailant.
Rule 3.853(b) sets forth the requirements for a facially
Category: Criminal Procedure
918 So. 2d 224, 2005 WL 2455820
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2005 | Docket: 1715212
Cited 16 times | Published
motion under rule 3.853, however, regarding the current items sought to be tested. Rule 3.853 provides formal
Category: Criminal Procedure
82 So. 3d 84, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 112, 2012 WL 386752, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 267
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 2012 | Docket: 60306273
Cited 15 times | Published
Water-house stated that in the context of a prior rule 3.853 motion for postconviction DNA testing, it was
Category: Criminal Procedure
957 So. 2d 1164, 2007 WL 1285808
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2007 | Docket: 1679417
Cited 14 times | Published
Creating Rule 3.853 (DNA Testing), 807 So.2d 633, 634 (Fla.2001) (adopting new rule 3.853 to establish
Category: Criminal Procedure
802 So. 2d 1173, 2001 WL 1613800
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2001 | Docket: 1332757
Cited 14 times | Published
this appeal, the Florida Supreme Court adopted rule 3.853 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which
Category: Criminal Procedure
983 So. 2d 443, 2008 WL 321494
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 29, 2008 | Docket: 1756478
Cited 13 times | Published
pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.853. The State did not oppose the motion and the
Category: Criminal Procedure
807 So. 2d 633
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2001 | Docket: 1505804
Cited 12 times | Published
FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CREATING RULE 3.853 (DNA Testing).
Amendment to Florida Rules of
Category: Criminal Procedure
761 F.3d 1256, 2014 WL 3809389, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 14953
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 4, 2014 | Docket: 115009
Cited 11 times | Published
of counsel.”
Id.
28
. Rule 3.853 "provides procedures for obtaining DNA (deoxyribonucleic
Category: Criminal Procedure
829 So. 2d 249, 2002 WL 2007881
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2002 | Docket: 1454401
Cited 11 times | Published
that hair to determine if in fact it is his.
Rule 3.853[1] sets forth the requirements for a facially
Category: Criminal Procedure
3 So. 3d 1091, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 166, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 142, 2009 WL 217969
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2009 | Docket: 1652822
Cited 10 times | Published
evidence and how it originally was obtained." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(b)(1). The motion must also allege that
Category: Criminal Procedure
848 So. 2d 1288, 2003 WL 21654408
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2003 | Docket: 1309348
Cited 9 times | Published
deny his motion without an evidentiary hearing.
Rule 3.853 is silent on when a trial court must conduct
Category: Criminal Procedure
802 So. 2d 402, 2001 WL 1502842
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 2001 | Docket: 477176
Cited 9 times | Published
use the tests for case work. Pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(postconviction DNA testing), a court, upon
Category: Criminal Procedure
26 So. 3d 534, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 629, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1948, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 629
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 2009 | Docket: 1117422
Cited 7 times | Published
correct statutory references.
Subdivision (c)(4) of rule 3.853 (Motion for Postconviction DNA Testing) is amended
Category: Criminal Procedure
1 So. 3d 407, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1053, 2009 WL 323340
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2009 | Docket: 1653341
Cited 7 times | Published
postconviction court improperly dismissed Murray's rule 3.853 motion because the record does not show that
Category: Criminal Procedure
974 So. 2d 1047, 2007 WL 3101804
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2007 | Docket: 1369450
Cited 6 times | Published
DCA 1993)). This standard has been applied to rule 3.853 motions for postconviction DNA testing. See Spaziano
Category: Criminal Procedure
912 So. 2d 642, 2005 WL 2175467
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 2005 | Docket: 1755516
Cited 6 times | Published
battery crimes, it must be raised pursuant to rule 3.853 and it must meet the rule's stringent requirements
Category: Criminal Procedure
894 So. 2d 857, 2005 WL 106963
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 2005 | Docket: 1768181
Cited 6 times | Published
his Brady and Giglio claims, and a motion under rule 3.853, seeking to obtain DNA testing on the remains
Category: Criminal Procedure
895 So. 2d 398, 2004 WL 2696901
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 2004 | Docket: 1674357
Cited 6 times | Published
pursuant to the mandates of section 925.11 and rule 3.853.
Id. at 419.
Thereafter, on September 20, 2003
Category: Criminal Procedure
861 So. 2d 1244, 2003 WL 22927489
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2003 | Docket: 1514119
Cited 6 times | Published
the murder of his wife, Michelle. He filed a rule 3.853 motion seeking DNA testing of fingernail scrapings
Category: Criminal Procedure
260 So. 3d 985
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2018 | Docket: 8439940
Cited 5 times | Published
court granted in part and denied in part King's rule 3.853 motion for postconviction DNA testing or running
Category: Criminal Procedure
851 So. 2d 811, 2003 WL 21748980
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2003 | Docket: 1691526
Cited 5 times | Published
crime, and at Riley's apartment. In *812 his rule 3.853 motion, Riley sought DNA testing of blood on
Category: Criminal Procedure
850 So. 2d 574, 2003 WL 21338921
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 2003 | Docket: 1783561
Cited 5 times | Published
of subsections (b)(1), (b)(3), and (b)(4) of rule 3.853.
We first note that under section 925.11(1)(a)
Category: Criminal Procedure
967 So. 2d 398, 2007 WL 3033515
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2007 | Docket: 1338393
Cited 4 times | Published
court ordered the state to respond. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(b). In response, the state asserted that
Category: Criminal Procedure
961 So. 2d 220, 2007 WL 1287190
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2007 | Docket: 1515775
Cited 4 times | Published
330. The "reasonable probability" standard from rule 3.853, which we applied in Van Poyck IV to affirm the
Category: Criminal Procedure
961 So. 2d 195, 2007 WL 1215217
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2007 | Docket: 468688
Cited 4 times | Published
days of the rendition of the order."); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(f) ("All orders denying relief must include
Category: Criminal Procedure
913 So. 2d 701, 2005 WL 2656107
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2005 | Docket: 1331222
Cited 4 times | Published
support the summary denial of a facially sufficient rule 3.853 petition); Jakeway v. State, 884 So.2d 290 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
884 So. 2d 1074, 2004 WL 2309042
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 2004 | Docket: 342801
Cited 4 times | Published
rape.
This court previously held that Warren's rule 3.853 motion was facially sufficient and instructed
Category: Criminal Procedure
840 So. 2d 438, 2003 WL 1386759
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2003 | Docket: 2570609
Cited 4 times | Published
Florida Statutes.
[2] We observe that in adopting Rule 3.853 to provide a procedural mechanism to implement
Category: Criminal Procedure
806 So. 2d 595, 2002 WL 125678
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2002 | Docket: 2575448
Cited 4 times | Published
Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure Creating Rule 3.853, 807 So.2d 633 (Fla.2001). See also Ch. 01-97
Category: Criminal Procedure
995 So. 2d 324, 2008 WL 4346309
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2008 | Docket: 1684498
Cited 3 times | Published
jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.; Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853. We affirm the trial court's denial of relief
Category: Criminal Procedure
963 So. 2d 913, 2007 WL 2428514
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2007 | Docket: 1146344
Cited 3 times | Published
jury trial. On September 30, 2003, Bain filed a rule 3.853 motion, which the postconviction court dismissed
Category: Criminal Procedure
946 So. 2d 1060, 2006 WL 3741061
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2006 | Docket: 2529299
Cited 3 times | Published
tests shall be provided in writing pursuant to rule 3.853[c](8). The circuit court shall then enter an
Category: Criminal Procedure
947 So. 2d 495, 2006 WL 3377787
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 2006 | Docket: 1720327
Cited 3 times | Published
Kris Edward Helton appeals from denial of his rule 3.853 motion for postconviction DNA testing. We affirm
Category: Criminal Procedure
935 So. 2d 55, 2006 WL 2096000
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 2006 | Docket: 1670986
Cited 3 times | Published
robbery, and kidnaping. The appellant filed a rule 3.853 motion seeking DNA testing of biological material
Category: Criminal Procedure
925 So. 2d 1111, 2006 WL 1143584
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2006 | Docket: 1146458
Cited 3 times | Published
have to file a timely, *1112 facially sufficient rule 3.853 motion. See Scarborough v. State, 906 So.2d 379
Category: Criminal Procedure
921 So. 2d 853, 2006 WL 508340
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 2006 | Docket: 1146514
Cited 3 times | Published
Lemay's motion is facially insufficient. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(b)(1). This affirmance is without prejudice
Category: Criminal Procedure
924 So. 2d 34, 2006 WL 167985
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2006 | Docket: 1736085
Cited 3 times | Published
a genuinely disputed fact at trial. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(b)(4). The record supports that finding
Category: Criminal Procedure
908 So. 2d 326, 2005 WL 1176050
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2005 | Docket: 1724834
Cited 3 times | Published
court's order summarily denying his rule 3.853 motion.
ANALYSIS
Rule 3.853 sets forth the procedures for obtaining
Category: Criminal Procedure
879 So. 2d 51, 2004 WL 1530889
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2004 | Docket: 463745
Cited 3 times | Published
investigation. § 925.11, Fla. Stat. (2002); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853. Spaziano requested that certain items of
Category: Criminal Procedure
872 So. 2d 427, 2004 WL 1057663
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2004 | Docket: 1357328
Cited 3 times | Published
post-conviction motion for DNA testing. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853. We reverse and remand for further proceedings
Category: Criminal Procedure
866 So. 2d 1257, 2004 WL 305748
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2004 | Docket: 1274043
Cited 3 times | Published
its face to establish a right to testing under rule 3.853 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and
Category: Criminal Procedure
854 So. 2d 684, 2003 WL 21655026
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2003 | Docket: 441168
Cited 3 times | Published
to Fla. Rules of Criminal Procedure Creating Rule 3.853, 807 So.2d 633, 634-35 (Fla.2001). We therefore
Category: Criminal Procedure
855 So. 2d 97, 2003 WL 21360387
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2003 | Docket: 1510934
Cited 3 times | Published
2002).
In order for a motion filed pursuant to rule 3.853 be considered facially sufficient, it must include
Category: Criminal Procedure
155 F. Supp. 3d 1253, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3529, 2016 WL 145826
District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 2016 | Docket: 64306292
Cited 2 times | Published
(“DNA motion”). The DNA motion filed pursuant to Rule 3.853. Fla. R.Crim. P. sought the testing of several
Category: Criminal Procedure
109 So. 3d 241, 2013 WL 440143
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 2013 | Docket: 60229524
Cited 2 times | Published
acquitted or receive a lesser sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(c)(5)(C). At this hearing, the associate
Category: Criminal Procedure
32 So. 3d 614, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 206, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 473, 2010 WL 1372691
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2010 | Docket: 1662974
Cited 2 times | Published
Postconviction DNA Testing Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 3.853." In his motion, Gore sought DNA testing of a
Category: Criminal Procedure
46 So. 3d 529, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 573, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1794, 2009 WL 3296231
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 2009 | Docket: 60296322
Cited 2 times | Published
motion for postconviction DNA testing.
ANALYSIS
Rule 3.853 requires that a motion for postconviction DNA
Category: Criminal Procedure
982 So. 2d 1226, 2008 WL 2167846
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 2008 | Docket: 1687064
Cited 2 times | Published
date of service of the order denying appellant's rule 3.853 motion is March 9, 2006, we dismiss this appeal
Category: Criminal Procedure
954 So. 2d 732, 2007 WL 1213419
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2007 | Docket: 1166258
Cited 2 times | Published
first-degree murder and robbery. Appellant filed a rule 3.853 motion seeking DNA testing of evidence collected
Category: Criminal Procedure
950 So. 2d 442, 2007 WL 403640
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2007 | Docket: 1752106
Cited 2 times | Published
reconsideration and summarily denied Jordan's Rule 3.853 motion upon a ruling that "given the circumstances
Category: Criminal Procedure
936 So. 2d 1213, 2006 WL 2570873
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 2006 | Docket: 315551
Cited 2 times | Published
complying with the pleading requirements set forth in rule 3.853(b). The trial court's order of dismissal is affirmed
Category: Criminal Procedure
929 So. 2d 34, 2006 WL 931550
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2006 | Docket: 1422634
Cited 2 times | Published
would be found, that is not the criteria. What rule 3.853 requires the court to find is "[w]hether it has
Category: Criminal Procedure
911 So. 2d 221, 2005 WL 2321699
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2005 | Docket: 1207243
Cited 2 times | Published
days of the rendition of the order."); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(f) ("All orders denying relief must include
Category: Criminal Procedure
906 So. 2d 379, 2005 WL 1705126
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 2005 | Docket: 2574401
Cited 2 times | Published
identification was in dispute within the meaning of rule 3.853(b)(4). See Saffold v. State, 850 So.2d 574, 577
Category: Criminal Procedure
908 So. 2d 321, 2005 WL 977015
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2005 | Docket: 1397415
Cited 2 times | Published
subsequently filed in circuit court the present rule 3.853 motion seeking DNA testing of certain evidence
Category: Criminal Procedure
908 So. 2d 321, 2005 WL 977015
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2005 | Docket: 1397415
Cited 2 times | Published
subsequently filed in circuit court the present rule 3.853 motion seeking DNA testing of certain evidence
Category: Criminal Procedure
878 So. 2d 470, 2004 WL 1697758
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2004 | Docket: 1353600
Cited 2 times | Published
maintains that his Rule 3.853 appeal cannot be an abuse of process because, in adding Rule 3.853, "The Florida
Category: Criminal Procedure
866 So. 2d 772, 2004 WL 360892
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 2004 | Docket: 84141
Cited 2 times | Published
defendant appeals an order denying as untimely his rule 3.853 motion for postconviction DNA testing. In light
Category: Criminal Procedure
837 So. 2d 1147, 2003 WL 366642
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2003 | Docket: 1527455
Cited 2 times | Published
made any findings with regard to this issue. Rule 3.853(c)(5) provides:
*1149 (5) The court shall make
Category: Criminal Procedure
218 So. 3d 426, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 604, 2017 WL 2210390, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 1079
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 18, 2017 | Docket: 6063843
Cited 1 times | Published
which were previously requested in his first rule 3.853 motion. Specifically, Bates again seeks DNA testing
Category: Criminal Procedure
217 So. 3d 977
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2017 | Docket: 4615976
Cited 1 times | Published
jury, leading to an acquittal.
2. Rule 3.853 requires that a motion for DNA testing must
Category: Criminal Procedure
210 So. 3d 140, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14119
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2016 | Docket: 4423913
Cited 1 times | Published
Thus, we concluded that Mr. Murray’s pro se rule 3.853 motion, which had been filed after counsel had
Category: Criminal Procedure
181 So. 3d 1207
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2015 | Docket: 3018838
Cited 1 times | Published
trial courts from denying facially sufficient rule 3.853 motions until after the State responds to the
Category: Criminal Procedure
116 So. 3d 255, 2013 WL 627117, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 272
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2013 | Docket: 60232340
Cited 1 times | Published
to authorize (nunc pro tunc) DNA testing under rule 3.853. Zeigler argued that the DNA results demonstrated
Category: Criminal Procedure
113 So. 3d 863, 2012 WL 2053296, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9197
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2012 | Docket: 60231624
Cited 1 times | Published
raise a facially sufficient claim pursuant to rule 3.853(b), a motion must include the following:
(1)
Category: Criminal Procedure
46 So. 3d 105, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15038, 2010 WL 3893953
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2010 | Docket: 1928232
Cited 1 times | Published
rule 3.800(a) (closed case no. 4D09-2322), and rule 3.853 (closed case no. 4D03-1201).
[2] O'Berry appealed
Category: Criminal Procedure
41 So. 3d 1050, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11711, 2010 WL 3155027
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 2010 | Docket: 1238106
Cited 1 times | Published
We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Rule 3.853(b) prescribes the required contents of a motion
Category: Criminal Procedure
20 So. 3d 974, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15791, 2009 WL 3350168
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2009 | Docket: 1433808
Cited 1 times | Published
analysis and postconviction DNA testing pursuant to rule 3.853 in Duval County Circuit Court case number 16-99-CF-5084-AXXX-MA
Category: Criminal Procedure
13 So. 3d 1088, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10065, 2009 WL 1940425
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 2009 | Docket: 2546987
Cited 1 times | Published
an agreed order for DNA testing. Pursuant to rule 3.853(c)(8), the results were provided to the parties
Category: Criminal Procedure
15 So. 3d 35, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5784, 2009 WL 1383401
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2009 | Docket: 1660900
Cited 1 times | Published
DCA 2007) ("A trial court's summary denial of a Rule 3.853 motion for DNA testing must be reversed, however
Category: Criminal Procedure
9 So. 3d 723, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3440, 2009 WL 1066293
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2009 | Docket: 1222114
Cited 1 times | Published
sentenced to life in prison. He filed the instant rule 3.853 motion in 2006. In his motion, Bain sought DNA
Category: Criminal Procedure
6 So. 3d 122, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3252, 2009 WL 1025878
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2009 | Docket: 308309
Cited 1 times | Published
3.853. However, as a result of amendments to rule 3.853 and statutes governing DNA testing, a motion
Category: Criminal Procedure
3 So. 3d 1014, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 88, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 129, 2009 WL 196364
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2009 | Docket: 60289122
Cited 1 times | Published
“does not satisfy the pleading requirements of rule 3.853 in that it is not under oath, nor does the motion
Category: Criminal Procedure
979 So. 2d 1121, 2008 WL 1065784
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 2008 | Docket: 1503000
Cited 1 times | Published
the motion is facially insufficient regarding Rule 3.853(b)(3) and (4). Appellant may replead *1122 in
Category: Criminal Procedure
978 So. 2d 176, 2007 WL 1201703
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2007 | Docket: 208668
Cited 1 times | Published
Murray's motion is facially insufficient. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(b). This affirmance is without prejudice
Category: Criminal Procedure
931 So. 2d 205, 2006 WL 1559760
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2006 | Docket: 1522200
Cited 1 times | Published
J.
Houston appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.853 motion for postconviction DNA testing. We affirm
Category: Criminal Procedure
922 So. 2d 383, 2006 WL 508331
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 2006 | Docket: 2570854
Cited 1 times | Published
So.2d 1288 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(c)(3). The record does not contain any testimony
Category: Criminal Procedure
919 So. 2d 573, 2006 WL 47472
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 2006 | Docket: 1269623
Cited 1 times | Published
850.
We affirm the denial of DNA testing under Rule 3.853, but grant leave for the defendant to file an
Category: Criminal Procedure
909 So. 2d 922, 2005 WL 1677985
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2005 | Docket: 1602147
Cited 1 times | Published
challenges to Huffman's convictions premised upon rule 3.853." See Huffman v. State, 837 So.2d 1147, 1147
Category: Criminal Procedure
903 So. 2d 238, 2005 WL 954645
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2005 | Docket: 1258157
Cited 1 times | Published
determined that rule 3.853 presents no occasion to rule on a Youngblood claim. Rule 3.853 provides procedures
Category: Criminal Procedure
876 So. 2d 641, 2004 WL 1360771
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2004 | Docket: 1245467
Cited 1 times | Published
ground stated by the trial court in denying the rule 3.853 motion was that evidence had been destroyed,
Category: Criminal Procedure
870 So. 2d 927, 2004 WL 865831
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 2004 | Docket: 1697912
Cited 1 times | Published
["Olvera"] appeals the summary denial of his second rule 3.853 "Motion for DNA Evidence Examination." We affirm
Category: Criminal Procedure
870 So. 2d 926, 2004 WL 840629
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 2004 | Docket: 347077
Cited 1 times | Published
likely would produce a definitive result." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(b)(2). Because appellant cannot show that
Category: Criminal Procedure
869 So. 2d 723, 2004 WL 735532
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2004 | Docket: 1175039
Cited 1 times | Published
findings in *724 conformity with the requirements of rule 3.853(c)(5), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
After
Category: Criminal Procedure
884 So. 2d 70, 2004 WL 625633
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2004 | Docket: 1281990
Cited 1 times | Published
outcome."
On appeal from the summary denial of a rule 3.853 motion, "unless the record shows conclusively
Category: Criminal Procedure
857 So. 2d 277, 2003 WL 22136845
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 2003 | Docket: 2584797
Cited 1 times | Published
Cherryhomes might have to file a facially sufficient rule 3.853 motion containing an adequate oath[1] within
Category: Criminal Procedure
851 So. 2d 817, 2003 WL 21749052
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2003 | Docket: 294713
Cited 1 times | Published
to comply with the procedural requirements of rule 3.853 because the motion *818 "does not demonstrate
Category: Criminal Procedure
832 So. 2d 835, 2002 WL 31525291
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2002 | Docket: 1699995
Cited 1 times | Published
results of court-ordered DNA testing obtained under rule 3.853 is to be treated as raising a claim of newly
Category: Criminal Procedure
824 So. 2d 958, 2002 WL 1842802
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 2002 | Docket: 2583574
Cited 1 times | Published
conclusive result could now be obtained. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(2).
We agree with the trial court's denial
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2025 | Docket: 70340566
Published
[May 22, 2025]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 2025 | Docket: 69929812
Published
v. State, 866 So. 2d 23, 27–28 (Fla. 2004)
(“Rule 3.853 is not intended to be a fishing expedition.
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2025 | Docket: 69870745
Published
Note
[No Change]
RULE 3.853. MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION DNA TESTING
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067578
Published
2024]
Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067578
Published
2024]
Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067577
Published
2024]
Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067578
Published
2024]
Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067578
Published
2024]
Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067578
Published
2024]
Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067578
Published
2024]
Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067577
Published
2024]
Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067577
Published
2024]
Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067577
Published
2024]
Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067578
Published
2024]
Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067577
Published
2024]
Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067579
Published
2024]
Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067578
Published
2024]
Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067577
Published
2024]
Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067577
Published
2024]
Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067577
Published
2024]
Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2024 | Docket: 69006071
Published
[August 1, 2024]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2024 | Docket: 68972079
Published
defendant's
sentence.”) (quoting Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(b)(1)-(4)); Hitchcock v. State, 866
So
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2024 | Docket: 68929115
Published
defendant's
sentence.”) (quoting Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(b)(1)-(4)); Hitchcock v. State, 866
So
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2024 | Docket: 68913301
Published
[July 3, 2024]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Fifteenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2024 | Docket: 68553304
Published
[May 22, 2024]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Fifteenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2024 | Docket: 68443729
Published
JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(b) (requiring that a motion for
postconviction
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 2024 | Docket: 68234670
Published
[February 8, 2024]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Fifteenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2024 | Docket: 68215568
Published
[February 1, 2024]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2024 | Docket: 68192141
Published
[January 25, 2024]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2024 | Docket: 68192125
Published
[January 25, 2024]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 2024 | Docket: 68152548
Published
motion for postconviction DNA testing
under rule 3.853 and section 925.11, Florida Statutes. In his
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 2023 | Docket: 68120486
Published
[December 28, 2023]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2023 | Docket: 68088073
Published
[December 14, 2023]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 2023 | Docket: 68029169
Published
[November 22, 2023]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2023 | Docket: 68003694
Published
post-conviction DNA testing filed
pursuant to Rule 3.853 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
The
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2023 | Docket: 67992608
Published
them were the subject of his prior unsuccessful rule
3.853 motion. The trial court summarily denied the
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 2023 | Docket: 67723770
Published
[August 24, 2023]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2023 | Docket: 67604712
Published
case involves the denial of the Yvelan Pierre’s Rule 3.853 motion
for post-conviction DNA testing. The
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2022 | Docket: 65664790
Published
[November 3, 2022]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2022 | Docket: 65592268
Published
[October 20, 2022]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Fifteenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2022 | Docket: 64942141
Published
[September 1, 2022]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2022 | Docket: 63339303
Published
[May 26, 2022]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 2022 | Docket: 63252851
Published
[April 21, 2022]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Fifteenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2021 | Docket: 61650787
Published
[December 30, 2021]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 2021 | Docket: 60385858
Published
[September 15, 2021]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Nineteenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2021 | Docket: 60041123
Published
defendant's sentence.”) (citations omitted); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(c)(5)(C)
(When ruling on a motion for
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2021 | Docket: 59974490
Published
[June 10, 2021]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2020 | Docket: 27333641
Published
[December 31, 2021]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Nineteenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 2020 | Docket: 17102757
Published
[April 23, 2020]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Fifteenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2020 | Docket: 16961859
Published
[March 12, 2020]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Nineteenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2020 | Docket: 16840565
Published
[February 13, 2020]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2019 | Docket: 16607145
Published
[December 19, 2019]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 2019 | Docket: 16439256
Published
[November 7, 2019]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2019 | Docket: 16128151
Published
to how DNA testing related to his case.
Rule 3.853 requires the movant to “lay out with specificity
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2019 | Docket: 15934585
Published
[July 18, 2019]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2019 | Docket: 15665645
Published
[May 23, 2019]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2019 | Docket: 14562386
Published
[February 21, 2019]
Appeal order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the
Fifteenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
264 So. 3d 366
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2019 | Docket: 64704605
Published
as may be determined by the court. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(c)(2). Here, the trial court erred in ruling
Category: Criminal Procedure
264 So. 3d 366
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2019 | Docket: 64704606
Published
as may be determined by the court. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(c)(2). Here, the trial court erred in ruling
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2019 | Docket: 14539143
Published
[February 7, 2019]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Fifteenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2019 | Docket: 14539136
Published
[February 7, 2019]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Fifteenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2019 | Docket: 14528482
Published
[January 31, 2019]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 2019 | Docket: 8470365
Published
[January 3, 2019]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Nineteenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2018 | Docket: 8454996
Published
[December 27, 2018]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
262 So. 3d 47
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2018 | Docket: 8439942
Published
without making independent findings as required by rule 3.853. Gosciminski claims that the State's memorandum
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2018 | Docket: 14544799
Published
court granted in part and denied in part King’s rule
3.853 motion for postconviction DNA testing or running
Category: Criminal Procedure
268 So. 3d 192
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2018 | Docket: 8395123
Published
Bing's motion based on his failure to satisfy rule
3.853(b)(4), we nevertheless affirm because Bing's
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2018 | Docket: 8152272
Published
[November 8, 2018]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2018 | Docket: 8047177
Published
[October 18, 2018]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Nineteenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
251 So. 3d 356
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 2018 | Docket: 64684957
Published
because it was facially insufficient. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(c)(2). We agree and affirm without prejudice
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2018 | Docket: 7727802
Published
[August 23, 2018]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2018 | Docket: 7784426
Published
because it was facially insufficient. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(c)(2). We
agree and affirm without prejudice
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2018 | Docket: 7416783
Published
[July 12, 2018]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2018 | Docket: 6384587
Published
[May 3, 2018]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Nineteenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2018 | Docket: 6361569
Published
[April 12, 2018]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Nineteenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
242 So. 3d 506
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2018 | Docket: 6362639
Published
evidence of the identity of the
murderer.
Rule 3.853(c) procedurally provides that if the postconviction
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2018 | Docket: 6342229
Published
[March 22, 2018]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2018 | Docket: 6305697
Published
[February 15, 2018]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 2018 | Docket: 6258872
Published
[January 11, 2018]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Fifteenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2017 | Docket: 6233366
Published
[November 30, 2017]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2017 | Docket: 6233374
Published
[November 30, 2017]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
235 So. 3d 912
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2017 | Docket: 60287168
Published
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2017 | Docket: 6224747
Published
[November 16, 2017]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Fifteenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
228 So. 3d 621, 2017 WL 4392889
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2017 | Docket: 6163425
Published
initial motion for'postconviction DNA testing under rule 3.853. Mr. Montez requested DNA testing of the murder
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2017 | Docket: 6155342
Published
[September 20, 2017]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
225 So. 3d 418, 2017 WL 3896914, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 12903
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2017 | Docket: 6153664
Published
established the requisite “good cause” under rule 3.853(c)(7).
1
We affirmed the State’s appeal
Category: Criminal Procedure
230 So. 3d 1219
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2017 | Docket: 60282701
Published
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2017 | Docket: 6135804
Published
[August 10, 2017]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2017 | Docket: 6089512
Published
[ July 13, 2017 ]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2017 | Docket: 6085957
Published
[July 6, 2017]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Nineteenth
Category: Criminal Procedure
197 So. 3d 130, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11073, 2016 WL 3916963
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2016 | Docket: 60256206
Published
court’s order. As the State correctly concedes, the rule 3.853 Motion currently before this Court is not time
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2016 | Docket: 4112459
Published
order.
As the State correctly concedes, the rule 3.853 Motion currently before this Court
is not time
Category: Criminal Procedure
179 So. 3d 407, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16958, 2015 WL 7008144
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2015 | Docket: 3011948
Published
postconviction DNA testing, filed pursuant to rule 3.853, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We reverse
Category: Criminal Procedure
177 So. 3d 310, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14892, 2015 WL 5836160
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2015 | Docket: 2865042
Published
Also, the motion was not verified as required in Rule 3.853(b).
Affirmance is without prejudice to appellant
Category: Criminal Procedure
175 So. 3d 928, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14518, 2015 WL 5724757
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2015 | Docket: 2863173
Published
postconviction court to comply with the requirements of rule 3.853.
Wright was convicted after a jury trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
165 So. 3d 708, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6739
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 2015 | Docket: 2679357
Published
original motion, and also denied relief under Rule 3.853. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Category: Criminal Procedure
183 So. 3d 1065, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5808, 2015 WL 1810370
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2015 | Docket: 2651563
Published
court failed to follow the procedures required by rule 3.853.
In 1983, Harris was found guilty of first-degree
Category: Criminal Procedure
149 So. 3d 143, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15256, 2014 WL 4840763
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2014 | Docket: 1401415
Published
summarily denying appellant’s facially sufficient rule 3.853 motion for DNA testing. As the State concedes
Category: Criminal Procedure
147 So. 3d 583, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13405, 2014 WL 4209214
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2014 | Docket: 1146098
Published
93 So.3d 1167, 1169 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).
Rule 3.853(c)(2) provides: “The court shall review the motion
Category: Criminal Procedure
141 So. 3d 752, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10477, 2014 WL 3359405
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2014 | Docket: 375689
Published
of “Uncle Matt” as her assailant.
In his rule 3.853 motion, Blackert sought DNA testing of the sexual
Category: Criminal Procedure
147 So. 3d 469, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 398, 2014 WL 2516326, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1806
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2014 | Docket: 797244
Published
served on the prosecuting authority.
Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(b). This Court has explained that “[i]t
Category: Criminal Procedure
140 So. 3d 510, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 355, 2014 WL 2186202, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1704
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 27, 2014 | Docket: 57512
Published
the deadline of October 1, 2003, set forth in rule 3.853(d)(1)(A), is hereby suspended until further order
Category: Criminal Procedure
128 So. 3d 942, 2013 WL 6821507, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20372
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2013 | Docket: 60237230
Published
such other time as may be ordered by the court.” Rule 3.853(c)(3) then provides that “[u]pon receipt of the
Category: Criminal Procedure
89 So. 3d 1071, 2012 WL 2011171, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8893, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1351
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2012 | Docket: 60308517
Published
“[A] mov-ant, in pleading the requirements of rule 3.853, must lay out with specificity how the DNA testing
Category: Criminal Procedure
91 So. 3d 182, 2012 WL 2011343, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9009
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2012 | Docket: 60309829
Published
evidence that may contain DNA still exists.” Rule 3.853(c)(5)(A), Fla. R.Crim. P. Here, the trial court
Category: Criminal Procedure
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 8, 2012 | Docket: 2904755
Published
” pursuant to Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853 and Fla.
Stat. § 925.11. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853 specifically governs
Category: Criminal Procedure
86 So. 3d 1243, 2012 WL 1557270, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7010
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2012 | Docket: 60307601
Published
that he is innocent of this crime. He based his rule 3.853 motion on the existence of newly available, much
Category: Criminal Procedure
56 So. 3d 91, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2648, 2011 WL 711084
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2011 | Docket: 60298698
Published
Motion for Post-Conviction Relief pursuant to rule 3.853, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The motion
Category: Criminal Procedure
67 So. 3d 262, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19440, 2010 WL 5184895
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2010 | Docket: 448380
Published
motion for postconviction DNA testing. See Fla. R. Crim P. 3.853. The postconviction court properly found
Category: Criminal Procedure
46 So. 3d 1154, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 16610, 2010 WL 4292197
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2010 | Docket: 2399307
Published
cause order, we conclude that the appellant’s rule 3.853 motion is facially sufficient. See Fla. R.Crim
Category: Criminal Procedure
43 So. 3d 688, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 481, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1454, 2010 WL 3431715
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 2010 | Docket: 60295465
Published
on December 21, 2009, proposing amendments to rule 3.853(c)(7), pertaining to the circumstances upon which
Category: Criminal Procedure
12 So. 3d 1270, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9344, 2009 WL 1940816
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 2009 | Docket: 60233770
Published
genuinely disputed issue in his case. This was error.
Rule 3.853(c)(2) states that upon receipt of the motion
Category: Criminal Procedure
11 So. 3d 977, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 4311, 2009 WL 1230753
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2009 | Docket: 1235077
Published
has noted, however, that "testing [pursuant to rule 3.853] may be available even if the defendant does
Category: Criminal Procedure
3 So. 3d 387, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 262, 2009 WL 103154
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2009 | Docket: 60289164
Published
untimely. Because the motion was not untimely under rule 3.853 or section 925.11, Florida Statutes (2007), we
Category: Criminal Procedure
959 So. 2d 305, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7057, 2007 WL 1342461
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2007 | Docket: 64851254
Published
summarily denied relief without explanation. Rule 3.853(b)(3) requires a statement of “how the DNA testing
Category: Criminal Procedure
958 So. 2d 450, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6789, 2007 WL 1296242
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2007 | Docket: 64851009
Published
sentence. However, pending the outcome of the rule 3.853 motion, the circuit court is not required to
Category: Criminal Procedure
953 So. 2d 513, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 116, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 558, 2007 WL 924070
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2007 | Docket: 64850055
Published
September 29, 2005, issued an order amending rule 3.853(d) on an interim basis, extending the deadline
Category: Criminal Procedure
940 So. 2d 1238, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18461, 2006 WL 3102285
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2006 | Docket: 64847630
Published
the merits of Tasker’s motion.
The version of rule 3.853 under which Tasker filed his motion required
Category: Criminal Procedure
940 So. 2d 1172, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15494, 2006 WL 2684834
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2006 | Docket: 64847617
Published
might have to file a timely facially sufficient rule 3.853 motion. See Harvey v. State, 925 So.2d 1111 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
932 So. 2d 496, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9424, 2006 WL 1627000
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2006 | Docket: 64845577
Published
an order permitting Chestnut to file a renewed rule 3.853 motion within sixty days. Chestnut v. State,
Category: Criminal Procedure
929 So. 2d 708, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8088, 2006 WL 1408670
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 2006 | Docket: 64844747
Published
had thirty days in which to appeal the order.
Rule 3.853 authorizes appeals from orders on motions which
Category: Criminal Procedure
927 So. 2d 239, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6805, 2006 WL 1194302
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 2006 | Docket: 64844235
Published
sufficiently complied with the pleading requirements of rule 3.853(b), and we remanded for DNA testing. Id. at 250
Category: Criminal Procedure
914 So. 2d 1084, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18769, 2005 WL 3179745
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2005 | Docket: 64840966
Published
for DNA evidence examination, filed pursuant to rule 3.853, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We reverse
Category: Criminal Procedure
912 So. 2d 355, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15701, 2005 WL 2447889
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2005 | Docket: 64840605
Published
would exonerate the defendant, as required by Rule 3.853(b)(8).
The State concedes that the defendant’s
Category: Criminal Procedure
935 So. 2d 1218, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 661, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 2053, 2005 WL 3193520
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2005 | Docket: 64846156
Published
amendment, the Court amends, on an interim basis, rule 3.853(d)(1) as follows:
(d) Time Limitations.
(1) The
Category: Criminal Procedure
912 So. 2d 57, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14414, 2005 WL 2219285
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2005 | Docket: 64840581
Published
prejudice to file a legally sufficient motion under rule 3.853.
WARNER, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Category: Criminal Procedure
904 So. 2d 582, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9220, 2005 WL 1398501
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2005 | Docket: 64839064
Published
reverse.
The trial court dismissed Jefferson’s rule 3.853 petition as untimely filed, relying on the state’s
Category: Criminal Procedure
900 So. 2d 624, 2005 WL 600653
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2005 | Docket: 287058
Published
trial court to conduct a hearing, pursuant to rule 3.853, and make a factual determination as to whether
Category: Criminal Procedure
889 So. 2d 919, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18809, 2004 WL 3029500
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2004 | Docket: 64835160
Published
McClinton might have to file a facially sufficient rule 3.853 motion within sixty days from the date of the
Category: Criminal Procedure
885 So. 2d 993, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 16452, 2004 WL 2452522
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2004 | Docket: 64833899
Published
order for Block to be entitled to relief under rule 3.853, he must show “how the DNA testing requested
Category: Criminal Procedure
884 So. 2d 502, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14834, 2004 WL 2254561
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 2004 | Docket: 64833574
Published
Supreme Court suspended the deadline for filing a rule 3.853 motion in Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal
Category: Criminal Procedure
884 So. 2d 934, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 482, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 1521, 2004 WL 2047658
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 2004 | Docket: 64833621
Published
Jud. Admin. 2.130(e).
BACKGROUND
The history of rule 3.853 is succinctly set forth as follows in Amendment
Category: Criminal Procedure
875 So. 2d 1289, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10157, 2004 WL 1530902
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2004 | Docket: 64831218
Published
the trial court’s order summarily denying his rule 3.853 motion for DNA testing. The trial court ruled
Category: Criminal Procedure
874 So. 2d 1260, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8251, 2004 WL 1263760
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2004 | Docket: 64831025
Published
case number 1D02-3940 (appeal from denial of a rule 3.853 motion dismissed by unpublished order for failure
Category: Criminal Procedure
875 So. 2d 726, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8046, 2004 WL 1252708
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2004 | Docket: 64831111
Published
So.2d 574 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (holding that a rule 3.853 motion that does not contain at least some information
Category: Criminal Procedure
875 So. 2d 726, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8046, 2004 WL 1252708
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2004 | Docket: 64831111
Published
So.2d 574 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (holding that a rule 3.853 motion that does not contain at least some information
Category: Criminal Procedure
867 So. 2d 627, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2826, 2004 WL 444562
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2004 | Docket: 64828678
Published
DNA Evidence Examination does not comply with rule 3.853, Fla. R.Crim. P., but instead attempts to argue
Category: Criminal Procedure
866 So. 2d 748, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1534, 2004 WL 256550
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2004 | Docket: 64828357
Published
requests an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Rule. 3.853, the trial court could' not deny the request
Category: Criminal Procedure
862 So. 2d 943, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 221, 2004 WL 57269
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 2004 | Docket: 64827326
Published
State, 850 So.2d 574 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(b)(3), (4). Our affirmance is without prejudice
Category: Criminal Procedure
861 So. 2d 115, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19536, 2003 WL 23009043
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 2003 | Docket: 64826974
Published
DNA testings must be made under oath”); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.853(b) (“motion for postconviction DNA testing
Category: Criminal Procedure
859 So. 2d 534, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15708, 2003 WL 22399560
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2003 | Docket: 64826469
Published
PER CURIAM.
The order striking Appellant’s Rule 3.853 motion is affirmed, in light of the trial court’s
Category: Criminal Procedure
857 So. 2d 190, 2003 WL 22243950
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2003 | Docket: 64825860
Published
post-conviction motions for DNA testing under rule 3.853 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. See
Category: Criminal Procedure
848 So. 2d 1197, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9469, 2003 WL 21471733
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2003 | Docket: 64823873
Published
of jurisdiction.
The order denying Cheshire’s Rule 3.853 motion was rendered on 21 November 2002. Cheshire
Category: Criminal Procedure
827 So. 2d 387, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14583, 2002 WL 31255591
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2002 | Docket: 64817929
Published
court had jurisdiction to entertain appellant’s rule 3.853 motion. Therefore, we reverse and remand for
Category: Criminal Procedure
826 So. 2d 1069, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14500, 2002 WL 31399393
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2002 | Docket: 64817744
Published
to Fla. Rules of Criminal Procedure Creating Rule 3.853, 807 So.2d 633 (Fla.2001).
THOMPSON, C.J., and
Category: Criminal Procedure
821 So. 2d 318, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7358, 2002 WL 1058378
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 2002 | Docket: 64816401
Published
file a facially -sufficient motion pursuant to rule 3.853.
*319We affirm the denial of Harrison’s remaining
Category: Criminal Procedure