Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853 - MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION DNA TESTING | Syfert Law

Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853

RULE 3.853. MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION DNA TESTING

(a) Purpose. This rule provides procedures for obtaining
DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) testing under sections 925.11 and
925.12, Florida Statutes.

(b) Contents of Motion. The motion for postconviction DNA
testing must be under oath and must include the following:

(1) a statement of the facts relied upon in support of
the motion, including a description of the physical evidence
containing DNA to be tested and, if known, the present location or
last known location of the evidence and how it originally was
obtained;

(2) a statement that the evidence was not previously
tested for DNA, or a statement that the results of previous DNA
testing were inconclusive and that subsequent scientific
developments in DNA testing techniques likely would produce a
definitive result establishing that the movant is not the person who
committed the crime;

(3) a statement that the movant is innocent and how
the DNA testing requested by the motion will exonerate the movant
of the crime for which the movant was sentenced, or a statement
how the DNA testing will mitigate the sentence received by the
movant for that crime;

(4) a statement that identification of the movant is a
genuinely disputed issue in the case and why it is an issue or an
explanation of how the DNA evidence would either exonerate the
defendant or mitigate the sentence that the movant received;

(5) a statement of any other facts relevant to the
motion; and

(6) a certificate that a copy of the motion has been
served on the prosecuting authority.

(c) Procedure.

(1) Upon receipt of the motion, the clerk of the court
shall file it and deliver the court file to the assigned judge.

(2) The court shall review the motion and deny it if it is
facially insufficient. If the motion is facially sufficient, the
prosecuting authority shall be ordered to respond to the motion
within 30 days or such other time as may be ordered by the court.

(3) Upon receipt of the response of the prosecuting
authority, the court shall review the response and enter an order on
the merits of the motion or set the motion for hearing.

(4) In the event that the motion shall proceed to a
hearing, the court may appoint counsel to assist the movant if the
court determines that assistance of counsel is necessary and upon
a determination of indigency pursuant to section 27.52, Florida
Statutes.
(5) The court shall make the following findings when
ruling on the motion:

(A) Whether it has been shown that physical
evidence that may contain DNA still exists.

(B) Whether the results of DNA testing of that
physical evidence likely would be admissible at trial and whether
there exists reliable proof to establish that the evidence containing
the tested DNA is authentic and would be admissible at a future
hearing.

(C) Whether there is a reasonable probability that
the movant would have been acquitted or would have received a
lesser sentence if the DNA evidence had been admitted at trial.

(6) If the court orders DNA testing of the physical
evidence, the cost of the testing may be assessed against the
movant, unless the movant is indigent. If the movant is indigent,
the state shall bear the cost of the DNA testing ordered by the
court.

(7) The court-ordered DNA testing shall be ordered to
be conducted by the Department of Law Enforcement or its
designee, as provided by statute. However, the court, upon a
showing of good cause, may order testing by another laboratory or
agency certified by the American Society of Crime Laboratory
Directors/Laboratory Accreditation Board (ASCLD/LAB) or Forensic
Quality Services, Inc. (FQS) if requested by a movant who can bear
the cost of such testing.

(8) The results of the DNA testing ordered by the court
shall be provided in writing to the court, the movant, and the
prosecuting authority.

(d) Time Limitations. The motion for postconviction DNA
testing may be filed or considered at any time following the date
that the judgment and sentence in the case becomes final.
(e) Rehearing. The movant may file a motion for rehearing of
any order denying relief within 15 days after service of the order
denying relief. The time for filing an appeal shall be tolled until an
order on the motion for rehearing has been entered.

(f) Appeal. An appeal may be taken by any adversely
affected party within 30 days from the date the order on the motion
is rendered. All orders denying relief must include a statement that
the movant has the right to appeal within 30 days after the order
denying relief is rendered.

XVIII. FORMS

Cases Citing Rule 3.853

Total Results: 247

Alvarez v. Attorney General for Fla.

679 F.3d 1257, 2012 WL 1579489, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 9325

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 8, 2012 | Docket: 753889

Cited 93 times | Published

Testing," pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853 and Fla. Stat. § 925.11. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853 specifically governs

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnston v. State

27 So. 3d 11, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 64, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 62, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 64

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2010 | Docket: 1665077

Cited 41 times | Published

Johnston at trial violated the constitution. [2] Rule 3.853 originally contained a deadline for filing motions

Category: Criminal Procedure

King v. State

808 So. 2d 1237, 2002 WL 54414

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2002 | Docket: 1738455

Cited 40 times | Published

failure to adhere to the procedural requirements of rule 3.853. King filed an amended motion on January 11,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Overton v. State

976 So. 2d 536, 2007 WL 4191990

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2007 | Docket: 2518715

Cited 35 times | Published

See art. V, § 3(b)(1), (9), Fla. Const; Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Overton

Category: Criminal Procedure

Robinson v. State

865 So. 2d 1259, 2004 WL 170362

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2004 | Docket: 58859

Cited 32 times | Published

of acquittal or a lesser sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(b)(1)-(6); Hitchcock v. State, 866 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lott v. State

931 So. 2d 807, 2006 WL 948173

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2006 | Docket: 2518752

Cited 27 times | Published

remand, Lott filed a motion for DNA testing under rule 3.853. He claimed that genetic material from the crime

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hitchcock v. State

866 So. 2d 23, 2003 WL 23162540

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 2004 | Docket: 1273947

Cited 27 times | Published

Procedure Creating Rule 3.853 (DNA Testing), 807 So.2d 633 (Fla.2001). Under rule 3.853, a motion for postconviction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cole v. State

841 So. 2d 409, 2003 WL 124508

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2003 | Docket: 413079

Cited 23 times | Published

pursuant to the mandates of section 925.11 and rule 3.853. We find Cole's tenth claim, that Cole should

Category: Criminal Procedure

Willacy v. State

967 So. 2d 131, 2007 WL 1836848

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 2007 | Docket: 1733550

Cited 19 times | Published

defendant for that crime. . . . See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853. Further, in Hitchcock, 866 So.2d at 27

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tompkins v. State

872 So. 2d 230, 2003 WL 22304578

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2004 | Docket: 1356912

Cited 19 times | Published

See § 925.11(2)(f), Fla. Stat. (2002); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853; see also King v. State, 808 So.2d 1237

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. Secretary for Department of Corrections

530 F.3d 1335, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 12912, 2008 WL 2445763

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 19, 2008 | Docket: 922096

Cited 18 times | Published

prosecuting authority." Rule 3.853(c)(8); § 925.11(2)(i). Thus, a Rule 3.853 proceeding involves an application

Category: Criminal Procedure

Chandler v. Crosby

916 So. 2d 728, 2005 WL 2456006

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2005 | Docket: 2452077

Cited 18 times | Published

to Fla. Rules of Criminal Procedure Creating Rule 3.853, 807 So.2d 633, 636 (Fla.2001) (Anstead, J.,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Zollman v. State

820 So. 2d 1059, 2002 WL 1466525

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2002 | Docket: 112002

Cited 18 times | Published

in her identification of him as her assailant. Rule 3.853(b) sets forth the requirements for a facially

Category: Criminal Procedure

Duckett v. State

918 So. 2d 224, 2005 WL 2455820

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2005 | Docket: 1715212

Cited 16 times | Published

motion under rule 3.853, however, regarding the current items sought to be tested. Rule 3.853 provides formal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Waterhouse v. State

82 So. 3d 84, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 112, 2012 WL 386752, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 267

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 2012 | Docket: 60306273

Cited 15 times | Published

Water-house stated that in the context of a prior rule 3.853 motion for postconviction DNA testing, it was

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Fla. Rules of Final Arguments

957 So. 2d 1164, 2007 WL 1285808

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2007 | Docket: 1679417

Cited 14 times | Published

Creating Rule 3.853 (DNA Testing), 807 So.2d 633, 634 (Fla.2001) (adopting new rule 3.853 to establish

Category: Criminal Procedure

Galloway v. State

802 So. 2d 1173, 2001 WL 1613800

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2001 | Docket: 1332757

Cited 14 times | Published

this appeal, the Florida Supreme Court adopted rule 3.853 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which

Category: Criminal Procedure

Derrick v. State

983 So. 2d 443, 2008 WL 321494

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 29, 2008 | Docket: 1756478

Cited 13 times | Published

pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.853. The State did not oppose the motion and the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendment to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.

807 So. 2d 633

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2001 | Docket: 1505804

Cited 12 times | Published

FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CREATING RULE 3.853 (DNA Testing). Amendment to Florida Rules of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Joel Dale Wright v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

761 F.3d 1256, 2014 WL 3809389, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 14953

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 4, 2014 | Docket: 115009

Cited 11 times | Published

of counsel.” Id. 28 . Rule 3.853 "provides procedures for obtaining DNA (deoxyribonucleic

Category: Criminal Procedure

Knighten v. State

829 So. 2d 249, 2002 WL 2007881

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2002 | Docket: 1454401

Cited 11 times | Published

that hair to determine if in fact it is his. Rule 3.853[1] sets forth the requirements for a facially

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bates v. State

3 So. 3d 1091, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 166, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 142, 2009 WL 217969

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2009 | Docket: 1652822

Cited 10 times | Published

evidence and how it originally was obtained." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(b)(1). The motion must also allege that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Borland v. State

848 So. 2d 1288, 2003 WL 21654408

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2003 | Docket: 1309348

Cited 9 times | Published

deny his motion without an evidentiary hearing. Rule 3.853 is silent on when a trial court must conduct

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lemour v. State

802 So. 2d 402, 2001 WL 1502842

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 2001 | Docket: 477176

Cited 9 times | Published

use the tests for case work. Pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(postconviction DNA testing), a court, upon

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

26 So. 3d 534, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 629, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1948, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 629

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 2009 | Docket: 1117422

Cited 7 times | Published

correct statutory references. Subdivision (c)(4) of rule 3.853 (Motion for Postconviction DNA Testing) is amended

Category: Criminal Procedure

Murray v. State

1 So. 3d 407, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1053, 2009 WL 323340

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2009 | Docket: 1653341

Cited 7 times | Published

postconviction court improperly dismissed Murray's rule 3.853 motion because the record does not show that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kelley v. State

974 So. 2d 1047, 2007 WL 3101804

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2007 | Docket: 1369450

Cited 6 times | Published

DCA 1993)). This standard has been applied to rule 3.853 motions for postconviction DNA testing. See Spaziano

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morgan v. State

912 So. 2d 642, 2005 WL 2175467

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 2005 | Docket: 1755516

Cited 6 times | Published

battery crimes, it must be raised pursuant to rule 3.853 and it must meet the rule's stringent requirements

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tompkins v. State

894 So. 2d 857, 2005 WL 106963

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 2005 | Docket: 1768181

Cited 6 times | Published

his Brady and Giglio claims, and a motion under rule 3.853, seeking to obtain DNA testing on the remains

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cole v. State

895 So. 2d 398, 2004 WL 2696901

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 2004 | Docket: 1674357

Cited 6 times | Published

pursuant to the mandates of section 925.11 and rule 3.853. Id. at 419. Thereafter, on September 20, 2003

Category: Criminal Procedure

Schofield v. State

861 So. 2d 1244, 2003 WL 22927489

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2003 | Docket: 1514119

Cited 6 times | Published

the murder of his wife, Michelle. He filed a rule 3.853 motion seeking DNA testing of fingernail scrapings

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cecil Shyron King v. State of Florida

260 So. 3d 985

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2018 | Docket: 8439940

Cited 5 times | Published

court granted in part and denied in part King's rule 3.853 motion for postconviction DNA testing or running

Category: Criminal Procedure

Riley v. State

851 So. 2d 811, 2003 WL 21748980

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2003 | Docket: 1691526

Cited 5 times | Published

crime, and at Riley's apartment. In *812 his rule 3.853 motion, Riley sought DNA testing of blood on

Category: Criminal Procedure

Saffold v. State

850 So. 2d 574, 2003 WL 21338921

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 2003 | Docket: 1783561

Cited 5 times | Published

of subsections (b)(1), (b)(3), and (b)(4) of rule 3.853. We first note that under section 925.11(1)(a)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

967 So. 2d 398, 2007 WL 3033515

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2007 | Docket: 1338393

Cited 4 times | Published

court ordered the state to respond. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(b). In response, the state asserted that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Van Poyck v. State

961 So. 2d 220, 2007 WL 1287190

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2007 | Docket: 1515775

Cited 4 times | Published

330. The "reasonable probability" standard from rule 3.853, which we applied in Van Poyck IV to affirm the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

961 So. 2d 195, 2007 WL 1215217

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2007 | Docket: 468688

Cited 4 times | Published

days of the rendition of the order."); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(f) ("All orders denying relief must include

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carter v. State

913 So. 2d 701, 2005 WL 2656107

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2005 | Docket: 1331222

Cited 4 times | Published

support the summary denial of a facially sufficient rule 3.853 petition); Jakeway v. State, 884 So.2d 290 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Warren v. State

884 So. 2d 1074, 2004 WL 2309042

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 2004 | Docket: 342801

Cited 4 times | Published

rape. This court previously held that Warren's rule 3.853 motion was facially sufficient and instructed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stewart v. State

840 So. 2d 438, 2003 WL 1386759

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2003 | Docket: 2570609

Cited 4 times | Published

Florida Statutes. [2] We observe that in adopting Rule 3.853 to provide a procedural mechanism to implement

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hartline v. State

806 So. 2d 595, 2002 WL 125678

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2002 | Docket: 2575448

Cited 4 times | Published

Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure Creating Rule 3.853, 807 So.2d 633 (Fla.2001). See also Ch. 01-97

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wright v. State

995 So. 2d 324, 2008 WL 4346309

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2008 | Docket: 1684498

Cited 3 times | Published

jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.; Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853. We affirm the trial court's denial of relief

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bain v. State

963 So. 2d 913, 2007 WL 2428514

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2007 | Docket: 1146344

Cited 3 times | Published

jury trial. On September 30, 2003, Bain filed a rule 3.853 motion, which the postconviction court dismissed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Swafford v. State

946 So. 2d 1060, 2006 WL 3741061

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2006 | Docket: 2529299

Cited 3 times | Published

tests shall be provided in writing pursuant to rule 3.853[c](8). The circuit court shall then enter an

Category: Criminal Procedure

Helton v. State

947 So. 2d 495, 2006 WL 3377787

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 2006 | Docket: 1720327

Cited 3 times | Published

Kris Edward Helton appeals from denial of his rule 3.853 motion for postconviction DNA testing. We affirm

Category: Criminal Procedure

Girley v. State

935 So. 2d 55, 2006 WL 2096000

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 2006 | Docket: 1670986

Cited 3 times | Published

robbery, and kidnaping. The appellant filed a rule 3.853 motion seeking DNA testing of biological material

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harvey v. State

925 So. 2d 1111, 2006 WL 1143584

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2006 | Docket: 1146458

Cited 3 times | Published

have to file a timely, *1112 facially sufficient rule 3.853 motion. See Scarborough v. State, 906 So.2d 379

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lemay v. State

921 So. 2d 853, 2006 WL 508340

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 2006 | Docket: 1146514

Cited 3 times | Published

Lemay's motion is facially insufficient. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(b)(1). This affirmance is without prejudice

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hampton v. State

924 So. 2d 34, 2006 WL 167985

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2006 | Docket: 1736085

Cited 3 times | Published

a genuinely disputed fact at trial. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(b)(4). The record supports that finding

Category: Criminal Procedure

Van Poyck v. State

908 So. 2d 326, 2005 WL 1176050

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2005 | Docket: 1724834

Cited 3 times | Published

court's order summarily denying his rule 3.853 motion. ANALYSIS Rule 3.853 sets forth the procedures for obtaining

Category: Criminal Procedure

Spaziano v. State

879 So. 2d 51, 2004 WL 1530889

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2004 | Docket: 463745

Cited 3 times | Published

investigation. § 925.11, Fla. Stat. (2002); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853. Spaziano requested that certain items of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cheshire v. State

872 So. 2d 427, 2004 WL 1057663

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2004 | Docket: 1357328

Cited 3 times | Published

post-conviction motion for DNA testing. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853. We reverse and remand for further proceedings

Category: Criminal Procedure

Crow v. State

866 So. 2d 1257, 2004 WL 305748

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2004 | Docket: 1274043

Cited 3 times | Published

its face to establish a right to testing under rule 3.853 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

854 So. 2d 684, 2003 WL 21655026

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2003 | Docket: 441168

Cited 3 times | Published

to Fla. Rules of Criminal Procedure Creating Rule 3.853, 807 So.2d 633, 634-35 (Fla.2001). We therefore

Category: Criminal Procedure

Manual v. State

855 So. 2d 97, 2003 WL 21360387

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2003 | Docket: 1510934

Cited 3 times | Published

2002). In order for a motion filed pursuant to rule 3.853 be considered facially sufficient, it must include

Category: Criminal Procedure

Overton v. Jones

155 F. Supp. 3d 1253, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3529, 2016 WL 145826

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 2016 | Docket: 64306292

Cited 2 times | Published

(“DNA motion”). The DNA motion filed pursuant to Rule 3.853. Fla. R.Crim. P. sought the testing of several

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cardona v. State

109 So. 3d 241, 2013 WL 440143

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 2013 | Docket: 60229524

Cited 2 times | Published

acquitted or receive a lesser sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(c)(5)(C). At this hearing, the associate

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gore v. State

32 So. 3d 614, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 206, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 473, 2010 WL 1372691

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2010 | Docket: 1662974

Cited 2 times | Published

Postconviction DNA Testing Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 3.853." In his motion, Gore sought DNA testing of a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Scott v. State

46 So. 3d 529, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 573, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1794, 2009 WL 3296231

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 2009 | Docket: 60296322

Cited 2 times | Published

motion for postconviction DNA testing. ANALYSIS Rule 3.853 requires that a motion for postconviction DNA

Category: Criminal Procedure

Palm v. State

982 So. 2d 1226, 2008 WL 2167846

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 2008 | Docket: 1687064

Cited 2 times | Published

date of service of the order denying appellant's rule 3.853 motion is March 9, 2006, we dismiss this appeal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Glenn v. State

954 So. 2d 732, 2007 WL 1213419

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2007 | Docket: 1166258

Cited 2 times | Published

first-degree murder and robbery. Appellant filed a rule 3.853 motion seeking DNA testing of evidence collected

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jordan v. State

950 So. 2d 442, 2007 WL 403640

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2007 | Docket: 1752106

Cited 2 times | Published

reconsideration and summarily denied Jordan's Rule 3.853 motion upon a ruling that "given the circumstances

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lindsey v. State

936 So. 2d 1213, 2006 WL 2570873

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 2006 | Docket: 315551

Cited 2 times | Published

complying with the pleading requirements set forth in rule 3.853(b). The trial court's order of dismissal is affirmed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Reddick v. State

929 So. 2d 34, 2006 WL 931550

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2006 | Docket: 1422634

Cited 2 times | Published

would be found, that is not the criteria. What rule 3.853 requires the court to find is "[w]hether it has

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harris v. State

911 So. 2d 221, 2005 WL 2321699

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2005 | Docket: 1207243

Cited 2 times | Published

days of the rendition of the order."); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(f) ("All orders denying relief must include

Category: Criminal Procedure

Scarborough v. State

906 So. 2d 379, 2005 WL 1705126

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 2005 | Docket: 2574401

Cited 2 times | Published

identification was in dispute within the meaning of rule 3.853(b)(4). See Saffold v. State, 850 So.2d 574, 577

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sireci v. State

908 So. 2d 321, 2005 WL 977015

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2005 | Docket: 1397415

Cited 2 times | Published

subsequently filed in circuit court the present rule 3.853 motion seeking DNA testing of certain evidence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sireci v. State

908 So. 2d 321, 2005 WL 977015

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2005 | Docket: 1397415

Cited 2 times | Published

subsequently filed in circuit court the present rule 3.853 motion seeking DNA testing of certain evidence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gaffney v. State

878 So. 2d 470, 2004 WL 1697758

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2004 | Docket: 1353600

Cited 2 times | Published

maintains that his Rule 3.853 appeal cannot be an abuse of process because, in adding Rule 3.853, "The Florida

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carter v. State

866 So. 2d 772, 2004 WL 360892

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 2004 | Docket: 84141

Cited 2 times | Published

defendant appeals an order denying as untimely his rule 3.853 motion for postconviction DNA testing. In light

Category: Criminal Procedure

Huffman v. State

837 So. 2d 1147, 2003 WL 366642

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2003 | Docket: 1527455

Cited 2 times | Published

made any findings with regard to this issue. Rule 3.853(c)(5) provides: *1149 (5) The court shall make

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kayle Barrington Bates v. State of Florida

218 So. 3d 426, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 604, 2017 WL 2210390, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 1079

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 18, 2017 | Docket: 6063843

Cited 1 times | Published

which were previously requested in his first rule 3.853 motion. Specifically, Bates again seeks DNA testing

Category: Criminal Procedure

& SC16-56 Cary Michael Lambrix v. State of Florida and Cary Michael Lambrix v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

217 So. 3d 977

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2017 | Docket: 4615976

Cited 1 times | Published

jury, leading to an acquittal. 2. Rule 3.853 requires that a motion for DNA testing must

Category: Criminal Procedure

Baker v. State

210 So. 3d 140, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14119

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2016 | Docket: 4423913

Cited 1 times | Published

Thus, we concluded that Mr. Murray’s pro se rule 3.853 motion, which had been filed after counsel had

Category: Criminal Procedure

Robert N. Gresham v. State of Florida

181 So. 3d 1207

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2015 | Docket: 3018838

Cited 1 times | Published

trial courts from denying facially sufficient rule 3.853 motions until after the State responds to the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Zeigler v. State

116 So. 3d 255, 2013 WL 627117, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 272

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2013 | Docket: 60232340

Cited 1 times | Published

to authorize (nunc pro tunc) DNA testing under rule 3.853. Zeigler argued that the DNA results demonstrated

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dubose v. State

113 So. 3d 863, 2012 WL 2053296, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9197

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2012 | Docket: 60231624

Cited 1 times | Published

raise a facially sufficient claim pursuant to rule 3.853(b), a motion must include the following: (1)

Category: Criminal Procedure

O'Berry v. State

46 So. 3d 105, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15038, 2010 WL 3893953

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2010 | Docket: 1928232

Cited 1 times | Published

rule 3.800(a) (closed case no. 4D09-2322), and rule 3.853 (closed case no. 4D03-1201). [2] O'Berry appealed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gonzalez v. State

41 So. 3d 1050, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11711, 2010 WL 3155027

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 2010 | Docket: 1238106

Cited 1 times | Published

We reverse and remand for further proceedings. Rule 3.853(b) prescribes the required contents of a motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Holland v. State

20 So. 3d 974, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15791, 2009 WL 3350168

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2009 | Docket: 1433808

Cited 1 times | Published

analysis and postconviction DNA testing pursuant to rule 3.853 in Duval County Circuit Court case number 16-99-CF-5084-AXXX-MA

Category: Criminal Procedure

Espinoza v. State

13 So. 3d 1088, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10065, 2009 WL 1940425

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 2009 | Docket: 2546987

Cited 1 times | Published

an agreed order for DNA testing. Pursuant to rule 3.853(c)(8), the results were provided to the parties

Category: Criminal Procedure

Padgett v. State

15 So. 3d 35, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5784, 2009 WL 1383401

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2009 | Docket: 1660900

Cited 1 times | Published

DCA 2007) ("A trial court's summary denial of a Rule 3.853 motion for DNA testing must be reversed, however

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bain v. State

9 So. 3d 723, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3440, 2009 WL 1066293

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2009 | Docket: 1222114

Cited 1 times | Published

sentenced to life in prison. He filed the instant rule 3.853 motion in 2006. In his motion, Bain sought DNA

Category: Criminal Procedure

SZEREMI v. State

6 So. 3d 122, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3252, 2009 WL 1025878

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2009 | Docket: 308309

Cited 1 times | Published

3.853. However, as a result of amendments to rule 3.853 and statutes governing DNA testing, a motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Consalvo v. State

3 So. 3d 1014, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 88, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 129, 2009 WL 196364

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2009 | Docket: 60289122

Cited 1 times | Published

“does not satisfy the pleading requirements of rule 3.853 in that it is not under oath, nor does the motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

LUCKNER v. State

979 So. 2d 1121, 2008 WL 1065784

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 2008 | Docket: 1503000

Cited 1 times | Published

the motion is facially insufficient regarding Rule 3.853(b)(3) and (4). Appellant may replead *1122 in

Category: Criminal Procedure

Murray v. State

978 So. 2d 176, 2007 WL 1201703

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2007 | Docket: 208668

Cited 1 times | Published

Murray's motion is facially insufficient. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(b). This affirmance is without prejudice

Category: Criminal Procedure

Houston v. State

931 So. 2d 205, 2006 WL 1559760

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2006 | Docket: 1522200

Cited 1 times | Published

J. Houston appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.853 motion for postconviction DNA testing. We affirm

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thompson v. State

922 So. 2d 383, 2006 WL 508331

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 2006 | Docket: 2570854

Cited 1 times | Published

So.2d 1288 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(c)(3). The record does not contain any testimony

Category: Criminal Procedure

Peterson v. State

919 So. 2d 573, 2006 WL 47472

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 2006 | Docket: 1269623

Cited 1 times | Published

850. We affirm the denial of DNA testing under Rule 3.853, but grant leave for the defendant to file an

Category: Criminal Procedure

Huffman v. State

909 So. 2d 922, 2005 WL 1677985

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2005 | Docket: 1602147

Cited 1 times | Published

challenges to Huffman's convictions premised upon rule 3.853." See Huffman v. State, 837 So.2d 1147, 1147

Category: Criminal Procedure

Moore v. State

903 So. 2d 238, 2005 WL 954645

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2005 | Docket: 1258157

Cited 1 times | Published

determined that rule 3.853 presents no occasion to rule on a Youngblood claim. Rule 3.853 provides procedures

Category: Criminal Procedure

Merson v. State

876 So. 2d 641, 2004 WL 1360771

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2004 | Docket: 1245467

Cited 1 times | Published

ground stated by the trial court in denying the rule 3.853 motion was that evidence had been destroyed,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Olvera v. State

870 So. 2d 927, 2004 WL 865831

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 2004 | Docket: 1697912

Cited 1 times | Published

["Olvera"] appeals the summary denial of his second rule 3.853 "Motion for DNA Evidence Examination." We affirm

Category: Criminal Procedure

Newberry v. State

870 So. 2d 926, 2004 WL 840629

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 2004 | Docket: 347077

Cited 1 times | Published

likely would produce a definitive result." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(b)(2). Because appellant cannot show that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Collins v. State

869 So. 2d 723, 2004 WL 735532

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2004 | Docket: 1175039

Cited 1 times | Published

findings in *724 conformity with the requirements of rule 3.853(c)(5), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. After

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ortiz v. State

884 So. 2d 70, 2004 WL 625633

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2004 | Docket: 1281990

Cited 1 times | Published

outcome." On appeal from the summary denial of a rule 3.853 motion, "unless the record shows conclusively

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cherryhomes v. State

857 So. 2d 277, 2003 WL 22136845

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 2003 | Docket: 2584797

Cited 1 times | Published

Cherryhomes might have to file a facially sufficient rule 3.853 motion containing an adequate oath[1] within

Category: Criminal Procedure

Warren v. State

851 So. 2d 817, 2003 WL 21749052

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2003 | Docket: 294713

Cited 1 times | Published

to comply with the procedural requirements of rule 3.853 because the motion *818 "does not demonstrate

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dedge v. State

832 So. 2d 835, 2002 WL 31525291

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2002 | Docket: 1699995

Cited 1 times | Published

results of court-ordered DNA testing obtained under rule 3.853 is to be treated as raising a claim of newly

Category: Criminal Procedure

Coombs v. State

824 So. 2d 958, 2002 WL 1842802

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 2002 | Docket: 2583574

Cited 1 times | Published

conclusive result could now be obtained. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(2). We agree with the trial court's denial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Karl Lee Thompson v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2025 | Docket: 70340566

Published

[May 22, 2025] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Robert Rodriguez v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 2025 | Docket: 69929812

Published

v. State, 866 So. 2d 23, 27–28 (Fla. 2004) (“Rule 3.853 is not intended to be a fishing expedition.

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.220, 3.851, and 3.853

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2025 | Docket: 69870745

Published

Note [No Change] RULE 3.853. MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION DNA TESTING

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lacy Crew, Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067578

Published

2024] Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lacy Crew, Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067578

Published

2024] Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lacy Crew, Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067577

Published

2024] Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lacy Crew, Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067578

Published

2024] Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lacy Crew, Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067578

Published

2024] Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lacy Crew, Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067578

Published

2024] Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lacy Crew, Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067578

Published

2024] Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lacy Crew, Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067577

Published

2024] Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lacy Crew, Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067577

Published

2024] Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lacy Crew, Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067577

Published

2024] Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lacy Crew, Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067578

Published

2024] Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lacy Crew, Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067577

Published

2024] Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lacy Crew, Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067579

Published

2024] Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lacy Crew, Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067578

Published

2024] Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lacy Crew, Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067577

Published

2024] Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lacy Crew, Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067577

Published

2024] Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lacy Crew, Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2024 | Docket: 69067577

Published

2024] Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lashan Jackson v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2024 | Docket: 69006071

Published

[August 1, 2024] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nelson Rodriguez v. The State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2024 | Docket: 68972079

Published

defendant's sentence.”) (quoting Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(b)(1)-(4)); Hitchcock v. State, 866 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rafael Toirac-Aguilera v. The State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2024 | Docket: 68929115

Published

defendant's sentence.”) (quoting Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(b)(1)-(4)); Hitchcock v. State, 866 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Raymond Soria W v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2024 | Docket: 68913301

Published

[July 3, 2024] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Larry B. Merritt v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2024 | Docket: 68553304

Published

[May 22, 2024] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

John Latham v. The State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2024 | Docket: 68443729

Published

JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(b) (requiring that a motion for postconviction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Charles Anthony Burns v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 2024 | Docket: 68234670

Published

[February 8, 2024] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Clint Nugent v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2024 | Docket: 68215568

Published

[February 1, 2024] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Emmanuel Gustave v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2024 | Docket: 68192141

Published

[January 25, 2024] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodibel Cuello Rizo v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2024 | Docket: 68192125

Published

[January 25, 2024] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Paul Glen Everett v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 2024 | Docket: 68152548

Published

motion for postconviction DNA testing under rule 3.853 and section 925.11, Florida Statutes. In his

Category: Criminal Procedure

Miguel V. Rodriguez v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 2023 | Docket: 68120486

Published

[December 28, 2023] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Daniel John Maglio v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2023 | Docket: 68088073

Published

[December 14, 2023] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Timothy Hartman v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 2023 | Docket: 68029169

Published

[November 22, 2023] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

EARL J. RAY, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2023 | Docket: 68003694

Published

post-conviction DNA testing filed pursuant to Rule 3.853 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Michael Gordon Reynolds v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2023 | Docket: 67992608

Published

them were the subject of his prior unsuccessful rule 3.853 motion. The trial court summarily denied the

Category: Criminal Procedure

TAVARES HUTCHINSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 2023 | Docket: 67723770

Published

[August 24, 2023] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

YVELAN PIERRE vs STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2023 | Docket: 67604712

Published

case involves the denial of the Yvelan Pierre’s Rule 3.853 motion for post-conviction DNA testing. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

FRITZ ALISME v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2022 | Docket: 65664790

Published

[November 3, 2022] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

MICHAEL ROMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2022 | Docket: 65592268

Published

[October 20, 2022] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

JORGE AYALA-VILLAMIZAR v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2022 | Docket: 64942141

Published

[September 1, 2022] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

MOISES CASCANTE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2022 | Docket: 63339303

Published

[May 26, 2022] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

JONATHAN MORALES v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 2022 | Docket: 63252851

Published

[April 21, 2022] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

ARTHUR R. THOMPSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2021 | Docket: 61650787

Published

[December 30, 2021] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

NEIL KURT SALAZAR v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 2021 | Docket: 60385858

Published

[September 15, 2021] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

FELIX CARBONELL v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2021 | Docket: 60041123

Published

defendant's sentence.”) (citations omitted); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(c)(5)(C) (When ruling on a motion for

Category: Criminal Procedure

BERNARD SMITH v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2021 | Docket: 59974490

Published

[June 10, 2021] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

TREVARIOUS J. PRIDE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2020 | Docket: 27333641

Published

[December 31, 2021] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

ANTHONY THOMPSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 2020 | Docket: 17102757

Published

[April 23, 2020] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

WILLIE LEWIS HULLETT v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2020 | Docket: 16961859

Published

[March 12, 2020] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

BREON T. DAVIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2020 | Docket: 16840565

Published

[February 13, 2020] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

STEPHEN KING v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2019 | Docket: 16607145

Published

[December 19, 2019] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

TYRA WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 2019 | Docket: 16439256

Published

[November 7, 2019] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Shuron Hester v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2019 | Docket: 16128151

Published

to how DNA testing related to his case. Rule 3.853 requires the movant to “lay out with specificity

Category: Criminal Procedure

MICHAEL C. DURHAM v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2019 | Docket: 15934585

Published

[July 18, 2019] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

BOBBY MELLARD v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2019 | Docket: 15665645

Published

[May 23, 2019] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

EDDIE T. NEAL v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2019 | Docket: 14562386

Published

[February 21, 2019] Appeal order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Santiago Robles v. State

264 So. 3d 366

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2019 | Docket: 64704605

Published

as may be determined by the court. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(c)(2). Here, the trial court erred in ruling

Category: Criminal Procedure

Santiago Robles v. State

264 So. 3d 366

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2019 | Docket: 64704606

Published

as may be determined by the court. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(c)(2). Here, the trial court erred in ruling

Category: Criminal Procedure

DOUGLAS SMYTH v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2019 | Docket: 14539143

Published

[February 7, 2019] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

MARCELO ESCOBAR v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2019 | Docket: 14539136

Published

[February 7, 2019] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

ANTHAWN MORRIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2019 | Docket: 14528482

Published

[January 31, 2019] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

JEAN LUXAMA v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 2019 | Docket: 8470365

Published

[January 3, 2019] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

MARK ONDICH v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2018 | Docket: 8454996

Published

[December 27, 2018] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Andrew Michael Gosciminski v. State of Florida

262 So. 3d 47

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2018 | Docket: 8439942

Published

without making independent findings as required by rule 3.853. Gosciminski claims that the State's memorandum

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cecil Shyron King v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2018 | Docket: 14544799

Published

court granted in part and denied in part King’s rule 3.853 motion for postconviction DNA testing or running

Category: Criminal Procedure

JOSEPH BING v. STATE OF FLORIDA

268 So. 3d 192

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2018 | Docket: 8395123

Published

Bing's motion based on his failure to satisfy rule 3.853(b)(4), we nevertheless affirm because Bing's

Category: Criminal Procedure

CECIL TOLBERT v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2018 | Docket: 8152272

Published

[November 8, 2018] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

ABEL PEREZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2018 | Docket: 8047177

Published

[October 18, 2018] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stucky v. State

251 So. 3d 356

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 2018 | Docket: 64684957

Published

because it was facially insufficient. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(c)(2). We agree and affirm without prejudice

Category: Criminal Procedure

JEROME WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2018 | Docket: 7727802

Published

[August 23, 2018] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Travis R. Stucky v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2018 | Docket: 7784426

Published

because it was facially insufficient. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(c)(2). We agree and affirm without prejudice

Category: Criminal Procedure

RENAL ST. HILAIRE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2018 | Docket: 7416783

Published

[July 12, 2018] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

JOSE DIONICIO CAQUIAS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2018 | Docket: 6384587

Published

[May 3, 2018] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

ANTRAWN D. PRICE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2018 | Docket: 6361569

Published

[April 12, 2018] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ira L. Lane v. State

242 So. 3d 506

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2018 | Docket: 6362639

Published

evidence of the identity of the murderer. Rule 3.853(c) procedurally provides that if the postconviction

Category: Criminal Procedure

RICHARD LEE ELLWOOD v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2018 | Docket: 6342229

Published

[March 22, 2018] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

CHARVON WARREN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2018 | Docket: 6305697

Published

[February 15, 2018] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

MICHAEL MARQUARDT v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 2018 | Docket: 6258872

Published

[January 11, 2018] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

LESLIE SMITH v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2017 | Docket: 6233366

Published

[November 30, 2017] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

GERRY PARISH v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2017 | Docket: 6233374

Published

[November 30, 2017] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mack v. State

235 So. 3d 912

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2017 | Docket: 60287168

Published

Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit

Category: Criminal Procedure

ANDRE D. MACK v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2017 | Docket: 6224747

Published

[November 16, 2017] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Montez v. State

228 So. 3d 621, 2017 WL 4392889

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2017 | Docket: 6163425

Published

initial motion for'postconviction DNA testing under rule 3.853. Mr. Montez requested DNA testing of the murder

Category: Criminal Procedure

TROY WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2017 | Docket: 6155342

Published

[September 20, 2017] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nathaniel Poole, Jr. v. State

225 So. 3d 418, 2017 WL 3896914, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 12903

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2017 | Docket: 6153664

Published

established the requisite “good cause” under rule 3.853(c)(7). 1 We affirmed the State’s appeal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Anderson v. State

230 So. 3d 1219

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2017 | Docket: 60282701

Published

Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit

Category: Criminal Procedure

JASON ANDERSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2017 | Docket: 6135804

Published

[August 10, 2017] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

CHARLES FLOYD v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2017 | Docket: 6089512

Published

[ July 13, 2017 ] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

MELVIN BRYANT v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2017 | Docket: 6085957

Published

[July 6, 2017] Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth

Category: Criminal Procedure

Taylor v. State

197 So. 3d 130, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11073, 2016 WL 3916963

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2016 | Docket: 60256206

Published

court’s order. As the State correctly concedes, the rule 3.853 Motion currently before this Court is not time

Category: Criminal Procedure

Taylor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2016 | Docket: 4112459

Published

order. As the State correctly concedes, the rule 3.853 Motion currently before this Court is not time

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rufus Mitchell v. State of Florida

179 So. 3d 407, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16958, 2015 WL 7008144

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2015 | Docket: 3011948

Published

postconviction DNA testing, filed pursuant to rule 3.853, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We reverse

Category: Criminal Procedure

Terrance L. McCloud v. State of Florida

177 So. 3d 310, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14892, 2015 WL 5836160

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2015 | Docket: 2865042

Published

Also, the motion was not verified as required in Rule 3.853(b). Affirmance is without prejudice to appellant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wright v. State

175 So. 3d 928, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14518, 2015 WL 5724757

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2015 | Docket: 2863173

Published

postconviction court to comply with the requirements of rule 3.853. Wright was convicted after a jury trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Marcus Blackmon v. State of Florida

165 So. 3d 708, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6739

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 2015 | Docket: 2679357

Published

original motion, and also denied relief under Rule 3.853. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harris v. State

183 So. 3d 1065, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5808, 2015 WL 1810370

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2015 | Docket: 2651563

Published

court failed to follow the procedures required by rule 3.853. In 1983, Harris was found guilty of first-degree

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kevin R. Miller v. State

149 So. 3d 143, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15256, 2014 WL 4840763

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2014 | Docket: 1401415

Published

summarily denying appellant’s facially sufficient rule 3.853 motion for DNA testing. As the State concedes

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hector Rosa v. State

147 So. 3d 583, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13405, 2014 WL 4209214

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2014 | Docket: 1146098

Published

93 So.3d 1167, 1169 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). Rule 3.853(c)(2) provides: “The court shall review the motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Blackert v. State

141 So. 3d 752, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10477, 2014 WL 3359405

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2014 | Docket: 375689

Published

of “Uncle Matt” as her assailant. In his rule 3.853 motion, Blackert sought DNA testing of the sexual

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ray Jackson v. State of Florida

147 So. 3d 469, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 398, 2014 WL 2516326, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1806

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2014 | Docket: 797244

Published

served on the prosecuting authority. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(b). This Court has explained that “[i]t

Category: Criminal Procedure

League of Women Voters v. Data Targeting, Inc.

140 So. 3d 510, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 355, 2014 WL 2186202, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1704

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 27, 2014 | Docket: 57512

Published

the deadline of October 1, 2003, set forth in rule 3.853(d)(1)(A), is hereby suspended until further order

Category: Criminal Procedure

Newton v. State

128 So. 3d 942, 2013 WL 6821507, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20372

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2013 | Docket: 60237230

Published

such other time as may be ordered by the court.” Rule 3.853(c)(3) then provides that “[u]pon receipt of the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dyson v. State

89 So. 3d 1071, 2012 WL 2011171, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8893, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1351

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2012 | Docket: 60308517

Published

“[A] mov-ant, in pleading the requirements of rule 3.853, must lay out with specificity how the DNA testing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Goodwin v. State

91 So. 3d 182, 2012 WL 2011343, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9009

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2012 | Docket: 60309829

Published

evidence that may contain DNA still exists.” Rule 3.853(c)(5)(A), Fla. R.Crim. P. Here, the trial court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carl Robert Alvarez v. Attorney General for the State of Florida

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 8, 2012 | Docket: 2904755

Published

” pursuant to Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853 and Fla. Stat. § 925.11. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853 specifically governs

Category: Criminal Procedure

Montez v. State

86 So. 3d 1243, 2012 WL 1557270, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7010

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2012 | Docket: 60307601

Published

that he is innocent of this crime. He based his rule 3.853 motion on the existence of newly available, much

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nelson v. State

56 So. 3d 91, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2648, 2011 WL 711084

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2011 | Docket: 60298698

Published

Motion for Post-Conviction Relief pursuant to rule 3.853, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Martin v. State

67 So. 3d 262, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19440, 2010 WL 5184895

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2010 | Docket: 448380

Published

motion for postconviction DNA testing. See Fla. R. Crim P. 3.853. The postconviction court properly found

Category: Criminal Procedure

McDole v. State

46 So. 3d 1154, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 16610, 2010 WL 4292197

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2010 | Docket: 2399307

Published

cause order, we conclude that the appellant’s rule 3.853 motion is facially sufficient. See Fla. R.Crim

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853

43 So. 3d 688, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 481, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1454, 2010 WL 3431715

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 2010 | Docket: 60295465

Published

on December 21, 2009, proposing amendments to rule 3.853(c)(7), pertaining to the circumstances upon which

Category: Criminal Procedure

Powell v. State

12 So. 3d 1270, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9344, 2009 WL 1940816

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 2009 | Docket: 60233770

Published

genuinely disputed issue in his case. This was error. Rule 3.853(c)(2) states that upon receipt of the motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davis v. State

11 So. 3d 977, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 4311, 2009 WL 1230753

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2009 | Docket: 1235077

Published

has noted, however, that "testing [pursuant to rule 3.853] may be available even if the defendant does

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas v. State

3 So. 3d 387, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 262, 2009 WL 103154

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2009 | Docket: 60289164

Published

untimely. Because the motion was not untimely under rule 3.853 or section 925.11, Florida Statutes (2007), we

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

959 So. 2d 305, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7057, 2007 WL 1342461

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2007 | Docket: 64851254

Published

summarily denied relief without explanation. Rule 3.853(b)(3) requires a statement of “how the DNA testing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ackerman v. State

958 So. 2d 450, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6789, 2007 WL 1296242

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2007 | Docket: 64851009

Published

sentence. However, pending the outcome of the rule 3.853 motion, the circuit court is not required to

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.170 & 3.172

953 So. 2d 513, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 116, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 558, 2007 WL 924070

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2007 | Docket: 64850055

Published

September 29, 2005, issued an order amending rule 3.853(d) on an interim basis, extending the deadline

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tasker v. State

940 So. 2d 1238, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18461, 2006 WL 3102285

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2006 | Docket: 64847630

Published

the merits of Tasker’s motion. The version of rule 3.853 under which Tasker filed his motion required

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morris v. State

940 So. 2d 1172, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15494, 2006 WL 2684834

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2006 | Docket: 64847617

Published

might have to file a timely facially sufficient rule 3.853 motion. See Harvey v. State, 925 So.2d 1111 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Chestnut v. State

932 So. 2d 496, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9424, 2006 WL 1627000

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2006 | Docket: 64845577

Published

an order permitting Chestnut to file a renewed rule 3.853 motion within sixty days. Chestnut v. State,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Block v. State

929 So. 2d 708, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8088, 2006 WL 1408670

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 2006 | Docket: 64844747

Published

had thirty days in which to appeal the order. Rule 3.853 authorizes appeals from orders on motions which

Category: Criminal Procedure

Knighten v. State

927 So. 2d 239, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6805, 2006 WL 1194302

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 2006 | Docket: 64844235

Published

sufficiently complied with the pleading requirements of rule 3.853(b), and we remanded for DNA testing. Id. at 250

Category: Criminal Procedure

Neal v. State

914 So. 2d 1084, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18769, 2005 WL 3179745

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2005 | Docket: 64840966

Published

for DNA evidence examination, filed pursuant to rule 3.853, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We reverse

Category: Criminal Procedure

Clayton v. State

912 So. 2d 355, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15701, 2005 WL 2447889

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2005 | Docket: 64840605

Published

would exonerate the defendant, as required by Rule 3.853(b)(8). The State concedes that the defendant’s

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853(D)

935 So. 2d 1218, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 661, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 2053, 2005 WL 3193520

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2005 | Docket: 64846156

Published

amendment, the Court amends, on an interim basis, rule 3.853(d)(1) as follows: (d) Time Limitations. (1) The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jesus v. State

912 So. 2d 57, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14414, 2005 WL 2219285

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2005 | Docket: 64840581

Published

prejudice to file a legally sufficient motion under rule 3.853. WARNER, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jefferson v. State

904 So. 2d 582, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9220, 2005 WL 1398501

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2005 | Docket: 64839064

Published

reverse. The trial court dismissed Jefferson’s rule 3.853 petition as untimely filed, relying on the state’s

Category: Criminal Procedure

Chestnut v. State

900 So. 2d 624, 2005 WL 600653

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2005 | Docket: 287058

Published

trial court to conduct a hearing, pursuant to rule 3.853, and make a factual determination as to whether

Category: Criminal Procedure

McClinton v. State

889 So. 2d 919, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18809, 2004 WL 3029500

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2004 | Docket: 64835160

Published

McClinton might have to file a facially sufficient rule 3.853 motion within sixty days from the date of the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Block v. State

885 So. 2d 993, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 16452, 2004 WL 2452522

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2004 | Docket: 64833899

Published

order for Block to be entitled to relief under rule 3.853, he must show “how the DNA testing requested

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kent v. State

884 So. 2d 502, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14834, 2004 WL 2254561

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 2004 | Docket: 64833574

Published

Supreme Court suspended the deadline for filing a rule 3.853 motion in Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853(d)(1)(A) (Postconviction DNA Testing)

884 So. 2d 934, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 482, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 1521, 2004 WL 2047658

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 2004 | Docket: 64833621

Published

Jud. Admin. 2.130(e). BACKGROUND The history of rule 3.853 is succinctly set forth as follows in Amendment

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wryals v. State

875 So. 2d 1289, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10157, 2004 WL 1530902

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2004 | Docket: 64831218

Published

the trial court’s order summarily denying his rule 3.853 motion for DNA testing. The trial court ruled

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

874 So. 2d 1260, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8251, 2004 WL 1263760

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2004 | Docket: 64831025

Published

case number 1D02-3940 (appeal from denial of a rule 3.853 motion dismissed by unpublished order for failure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vargas v. State

875 So. 2d 726, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8046, 2004 WL 1252708

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2004 | Docket: 64831111

Published

So.2d 574 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (holding that a rule 3.853 motion that does not contain at least some information

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vargas v. State

875 So. 2d 726, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8046, 2004 WL 1252708

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2004 | Docket: 64831111

Published

So.2d 574 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (holding that a rule 3.853 motion that does not contain at least some information

Category: Criminal Procedure

Figueroa v. State

867 So. 2d 627, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2826, 2004 WL 444562

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2004 | Docket: 64828678

Published

DNA Evidence Examination does not comply with rule 3.853, Fla. R.Crim. P., but instead attempts to argue

Category: Criminal Procedure

Delidle v. State

866 So. 2d 748, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1534, 2004 WL 256550

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2004 | Docket: 64828357

Published

requests an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Rule. 3.853, the trial court could' not deny the request

Category: Criminal Procedure

Burgess v. State

862 So. 2d 943, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 221, 2004 WL 57269

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 2004 | Docket: 64827326

Published

State, 850 So.2d 574 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(b)(3), (4). Our affirmance is without prejudice

Category: Criminal Procedure

Eddy v. State

861 So. 2d 115, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19536, 2003 WL 23009043

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 2003 | Docket: 64826974

Published

DNA testings must be made under oath”); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.853(b) (“motion for postconviction DNA testing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Flowers v. State

859 So. 2d 534, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15708, 2003 WL 22399560

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2003 | Docket: 64826469

Published

PER CURIAM. The order striking Appellant’s Rule 3.853 motion is affirmed, in light of the trial court’s

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wilson v. State

857 So. 2d 190, 2003 WL 22243950

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2003 | Docket: 64825860

Published

post-conviction motions for DNA testing under rule 3.853 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. See

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cheshire v. State

848 So. 2d 1197, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9469, 2003 WL 21471733

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2003 | Docket: 64823873

Published

of jurisdiction. The order denying Cheshire’s Rule 3.853 motion was rendered on 21 November 2002. Cheshire

Category: Criminal Procedure

Newberry v. State

827 So. 2d 387, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14583, 2002 WL 31255591

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2002 | Docket: 64817929

Published

court had jurisdiction to entertain appellant’s rule 3.853 motion. Therefore, we reverse and remand for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stewart v. State

826 So. 2d 1069, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14500, 2002 WL 31399393

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2002 | Docket: 64817744

Published

to Fla. Rules of Criminal Procedure Creating Rule 3.853, 807 So.2d 633 (Fla.2001). THOMPSON, C.J., and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harrison v. State

821 So. 2d 318, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7358, 2002 WL 1058378

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 2002 | Docket: 64816401

Published

file a facially -sufficient motion pursuant to rule 3.853. *319We affirm the denial of Harrison’s remaining

Category: Criminal Procedure