Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.710 - PRESENTENCE REPORT | Syfert Law

Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.710

RULE 3.710. PRESENTENCE REPORT

(a) Cases In Which Court Has Discretion. In all cases in
which the court has discretion as to what sentence may be
imposed, the court may refer the case to the Department of
Corrections for investigation and recommendation. No sentence or
sentences other than probation or the statutorily required
mandatory minimum may be imposed on any defendant found
guilty of a first felony offense or found guilty of a felony while under
the age of 18 years, until after such investigation has first been
made and the recommendations of the Department of Corrections
received and considered by the sentencing judge. The requirements
of this subdivision are not applicable to a subsequent violation of
probation proceeding.

(b) Capital Defendant Who Refuses To Present Mitigation
Evidence. Should a defendant in a capital case choose not to
challenge the death penalty and refuse to present mitigation
evidence, the court shall refer the case to the Department of
Corrections for the preparation of a presentence report. The report
shall be comprehensive and should include information such as
previous mental health problems (including hospitalizations), school
records, and relevant family background.

Committee Notes

1972 Adoption. The rule provides for the utilization of a pre-
sentence report as part of the sentencing process. While use of the
report is discretionary in all cases, it is mandatory in two instances,
the sentencing of a first felony offender and of a defendant under 18
years of age. Of course, no report is necessary where the specific
sentence is mandatory, e.g., the sentence of death or life
imprisonment in a verdict of first degree murder.

1988 Amendment. This amendment changes wording to
conform with current responsibility of the Department of
Corrections to prepare the presentence investigation and report.

2004 Amendment. The amendment adds subdivision (b).
Section 948.015, Florida Statutes, is by its own terms inapplicable
to those cases described in this new subdivision. Nonetheless,
subdivision (b) requires a report that is “comprehensive.”
Accordingly, the report should include, if reasonably available, in
addition to those matters specifically listed in Muhammad v. State,
782 So. 2d 343, 363 (Fla. 2000), a description of the status of all of
the charges in the indictment as well as any other pending offenses;
the defendant’s medical history; and those matters listed in sections
948.015 (3)–(8) and (13), Florida Statutes. The Department of
Corrections should not recommend a sentence.
2018 Amendment. The amendment modifies subdivision (a).
The rule makes clear that a report is not required prior to
sentencing in violation of probation proceedings following the ruling
in Barber v. State, 293 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 1974).

Cases Citing Rule 3.710

Total Results: 103

Charles William Proffitt v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Offender Rehabilitation

685 F.2d 1227

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 17, 1982 | Docket: 595786

Cited 180 times | Published

(Fla. 1968) and 253 So.2d 421 (Fla.1971)] with Rule 3.710, Fla.R.Crim.P. [adopted by Florida Supreme Court

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

272 So. 2d 65

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1973 | Docket: 1755077

Cited 102 times | Published

prosecuting attorney. Committee Note: Same as prior rule 3.710. 3.740. PROCEDURE WHEN INSANITY IS ALLEGED AS

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hargrave v. State

366 So. 2d 1

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1978 | Docket: 2518375

Cited 71 times | Published

court order a presentence report pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.710. Defense counsel proffered the fact that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Swan v. State

322 So. 2d 485

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 1975 | Docket: 2467698

Cited 50 times | Published

reports are provided for in Fla.R.Cr.P. 3.710. Rule 3.710 vests the trial court with the discretionary

Category: Criminal Procedure

Songer v. State

322 So. 2d 481

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 1975 | Docket: 1734769

Cited 41 times | Published

consideration, which in fact is authorized by Rule 3.710, Rules of Criminal Procedure, that supplements

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thompson v. State

328 So. 2d 1

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1976 | Docket: 1334397

Cited 31 times | Published

is urged by appellant as being in violation of Rule 3.710, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which states:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ault v. State

53 So. 3d 175, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 527, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1631, 2010 WL 3781991

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2010 | Docket: 2407582

Cited 29 times | Published

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.710. Under rule 3.710(b), "[s]hould a defendant in a capital case choose

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jackson v. State

366 So. 2d 752

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1978 | Docket: 1227094

Cited 28 times | Published

a first felony offender, contends that Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.710[3] requires a trial judge to order a presentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

536 So. 2d 992, 1988 WL 143602

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1988 | Docket: 2517246

Cited 27 times | Published

jury in understanding the jury instructions. RULE 3.710. PRESENTENCE REPORT In all cases in which the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Saavedra v. State

576 So. 2d 953, 1990 WL 175055

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1991 | Docket: 1669811

Cited 25 times | Published

in a footnote that, "[t]he committee note to Rule 3.710(d)(7) is revised to include language to clarify

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gardner v. State

313 So. 2d 675

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1975 | Docket: 2521472

Cited 20 times | Published

presentence investigation report pursuant to Rule 3.710, Cr.P.R. Appellant argues that in considering

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mikenas v. State

407 So. 2d 892

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1981 | Docket: 1515397

Cited 19 times | Published

without merit. The trial court is entitled by Rule 3.710, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, to draw

Category: Criminal Procedure

Adams v. State

376 So. 2d 47

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1979 | Docket: 1410776

Cited 16 times | Published

084(3)(a), 921.231, Florida Statutes (1977); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.710, 3.711, 3.712, 3.713. [4] The record of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Moody v. State

418 So. 2d 989

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1982 | Docket: 1288918

Cited 14 times | Published

also In re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 3.710, 362 So.2d 655 (Fla. 1978). On remand, the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kurlin v. State

302 So. 2d 147

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 1974 | Docket: 1745336

Cited 12 times | Published

benefit of a presentence investigation, citing Rule 3.710 RCrP and two recent opinions of this court, Mitchum

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Stafford

593 So. 2d 496, 1992 WL 10611

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1992 | Docket: 446626

Cited 11 times | Published

scoresheet, recommends the most severe sanction." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.710(d)(3) (emphasis added). In the case of multiple

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

308 So. 2d 127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1975 | Docket: 1251686

Cited 11 times | Published

of Florida by the promulgation and adoption of Rule 3.710 RCrP has already determined that the regulation

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.

606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1992 | Docket: 2191048

Cited 9 times | Published

attorney. Committee Notes 1968 Adoption (of Rule 3.710). A revamped version of section 921.06, Florida

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mitchum v. State

292 So. 2d 620

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1974 | Docket: 1511678

Cited 9 times | Published

presentence investigation in accordance with Rule 3.710, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F.S

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harden v. State

290 So. 2d 551

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1974 | Docket: 450747

Cited 9 times | Published

presentence investigation in accordance with Rule 3.710, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F.S

Category: Criminal Procedure

Martell v. State

676 So. 2d 1030, 1996 WL 347019

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1996 | Docket: 1692938

Cited 8 times | Published

required under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure, Rule 3.710. However, this is not the type of complaint Rule

Category: Criminal Procedure

Collins v. Wainwright

311 So. 2d 787

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1975 | Docket: 1776291

Cited 7 times | Published

without a presentence investigation as required by Rule 3.710, RCrP. Appellant was convicted and sentenced

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hernandez v. State

137 So. 3d 542, 2014 WL 1374046, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5161

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 2014 | Docket: 60240354

Cited 6 times | Published

from the mandatory presentence requirements of Rule 3.710.” 328 So.2d at 4. Brunson also differs from this

Category: Criminal Procedure

Yacob v. State

136 So. 3d 539, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 174, 2014 WL 1243782, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1030

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2014 | Docket: 60240033

Cited 6 times | Published

Florida Department of Corrections. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.710. The PSI indicated that Yacob had performed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harris v. State

574 So. 2d 1211, 1991 WL 20421

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1991 | Docket: 1436562

Cited 6 times | Published

presentence investigation (PSI) for the defendant. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.710. A probation officer conducting the PSI

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harris v. State

574 So. 2d 1211, 1991 WL 20421

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1991 | Docket: 1436562

Cited 6 times | Published

presentence investigation (PSI) for the defendant. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.710. A probation officer conducting the PSI

Category: Criminal Procedure

McFadden v. State

904 So. 2d 570, 2005 WL 1336752

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2005 | Docket: 2578231

Cited 5 times | Published

State, 872 So.2d 447 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.710(a) (providing that "[n]o sentence or sentences

Category: Criminal Procedure

Allen v. State

383 So. 2d 674

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1980 | Docket: 1512457

Cited 5 times | Published

investigation report was required after enactment of Rule 3.710, Fla.R. Crim.P., even though offense was committed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Huntley v. State

339 So. 2d 194

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1976 | Docket: 1436371

Cited 5 times | Published

Section 921.231 was not binding upon him and that Rule 3.710,[3] Florida *196 Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hill v. State

330 So. 2d 487

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1976 | Docket: 1774451

Cited 5 times | Published

presentence investigation in accordance with Rule 3.710 RCrP. We do not reach this question, because

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wilkerson v. State

583 So. 2d 428, 1991 WL 146655

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1991 | Docket: 2581233

Cited 4 times | Published

allegation of error is premised on the provision of Rule 3.710, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, that "[n]o

Category: Criminal Procedure

Walcott v. State

460 So. 2d 915

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1984 | Docket: 1766942

Cited 4 times | Published

consider a presentence report when required (Rule 3.710), (8) failure to give statutory jail time credit

Category: Criminal Procedure

McShay v. State

321 So. 2d 464

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 1975 | Docket: 1256303

Cited 4 times | Published

no rule requiring a presentence investigation. Rule 3.710, RCrP, became effective February 1, 1973 (272

Category: Criminal Procedure

Angel v. State

305 So. 2d 283

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1974 | Docket: 457054

Cited 4 times | Published

investigation and recommendation in violation of Rule 3.710, F.R.Cr.P., which provides in pertinent part

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Sweetman

302 So. 2d 164

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1974 | Docket: 1758513

Cited 4 times | Published

presentence investigation was mandatory under Rule 3.710, Fla.RCrP (1973), because this conviction was

Category: Criminal Procedure

Beverly v. State

330 So. 2d 527

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 1976 | Docket: 2532629

Cited 3 times | Published

prior felony conviction, the sentencing violated Rule 3.710, F.R.Cr.P. See Mitchum v. State, Fla.App. (1st)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Andrews v. State

309 So. 2d 576

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1975 | Docket: 1770837

Cited 3 times | Published

things, applicability to this particular case of Rule 3.710 RCrP. Mitchum v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1974, 292

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

297 So. 2d 93

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1974 | Docket: 1510391

Cited 3 times | Published

sentenced in compliance with the provisions of Rule 3.710, CrPR, 33 F.S.A. The record fails to disclose

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mask v. State

289 So. 2d 385

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1973 | Docket: 1322234

Cited 3 times | Published

sentencing will be conducted in accordance with Rule 3.710, 33 F.S.A., which now would prohibit a sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Caplinger v. State

271 So. 2d 780

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1973 | Docket: 1438545

Cited 3 times | Published

that in the new Criminal Rules of Procedure [Rule 3.710], 33 F.S.A., which becomes effective on February

Category: Criminal Procedure

Spain v. State

475 So. 2d 944, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2067

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1985 | Docket: 1301915

Cited 2 times | Published

be sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines, Rule 3.710, Fla.R.Crim.P. The trial judge chose to depart

Category: Criminal Procedure

Still v. State

296 So. 2d 67

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1974 | Docket: 246788

Cited 2 times | Published

and with the requirements of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.710. It is so ordered. SPECTOR, Acting C.J., and

Category: Criminal Procedure

NICKOLAS WHITE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

271 So. 3d 1023

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2019 | Docket: 15071943

Cited 1 times | Published

governs presentence investigations. The version of rule 3.710(a) in effect at the time of appellant’s resentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

In RE: AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE-2018 REGULAR-CYCLE REPORT.

265 So. 3d 494

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2018 | Docket: 7982207

Cited 1 times | Published

sentence exceeding the statutory maximum. Rule 3.710(a) (Presentence Report; Cases in Which Court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Henry Lee Jones v. State of Florida

212 So. 3d 321, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 257, 2017 WL 823600, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 421

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2017 | Docket: 4612629

Cited 1 times | Published

(2015); Muhammad, 782 So.2d at 363; see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.710(b) (requiring preparation of a comprehensive

Category: Criminal Procedure

James Robertson v. State of Florida

187 So. 3d 1207, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 108, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 551, 2016 WL 1053094

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2016 | Docket: 3045367

Cited 1 times | Published

was the original impetus for the adoption of rule 3.710(b). There the Court announced the policy, later

Category: Criminal Procedure

German v. State

27 So. 3d 130, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 541, 2010 WL 289183

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2010 | Docket: 1665208

Cited 1 times | Published

921.231(1)(d)-(m), Fla. Stat.; see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.710. But, the defendant declined. Not only did

Category: Criminal Procedure

Larkin v. State

474 So. 2d 1282, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2116

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1985 | Docket: 1471531

Cited 1 times | Published

court any errors which may appear in the report." Rule 3.710, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, committee

Category: Criminal Procedure

Quinones v. State

448 So. 2d 608

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1984 | Docket: 245654

Cited 1 times | Published

which may be called for in this case. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.710. Reversed and remanded.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Comparato v. State

419 So. 2d 1131, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21106

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1982 | Docket: 64592235

Cited 1 times | Published

reports and consideration of same pursuant to Rule 3.710, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and in

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mitchell v. State

381 So. 2d 760

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1980 | Docket: 2576517

Cited 1 times | Published

and a first-time felony offender and that under Rule 3.710, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. Wainwright

325 So. 2d 485, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 19131

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 1975 | Docket: 64551981

Cited 1 times | Published

obtaining a presentence investigation as required by Rule 3.710, RCrP, because petitioner was under the age of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rhynes v. State

312 So. 2d 520

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1975 | Docket: 1412692

Cited 1 times | Published

substantive matter said statute prevails over Rule 3.710, RCrP. Appellant contends that since the legislature

Category: Criminal Procedure

Grubbs v. State

311 So. 2d 411

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1975 | Docket: 1392593

Cited 1 times | Published

and considered by the sentencing judge. Since Rule 3.710 contemplates the report being prepared by the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jesse Bell v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 2025 | Docket: 71219088

Published

requires.” Bell, 336 So. 3d at 215 n.7 (citing Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.710(b)). 4. The circuit court found

Category: Criminal Procedure

CHRISTOPHER SOLS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2023 | Docket: 67068646

Published

conviction was otherwise upheld, we affirm. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.710(a) (“No sentence or sentences other than

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas H. Fletcher v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2022 | Docket: 63575519

Published

Muhammad, 782 So. 2d at 363; see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.710(b) (adopting the Muhammad standard). We

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jesse Bell v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 2022 | Docket: 62649857

Published

information a comprehensive PSI requires. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.710(b) (explaining that a comprehensive PSI

Category: Criminal Procedure

ALPHONSO LUCAS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2021 | Docket: 60695048

Published

right to a presentence investigation. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.710(a); Slinger v. State, 268 So. 3d 922, 924

Category: Criminal Procedure

ALPHONSO LUCAS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2021 | Docket: 60627047

Published

right to a presentence investigation. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.710(a); Slinger v. State, 268 So. 3d 922, 924

Category: Criminal Procedure

Michael Lawrence Woodbury v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 2021 | Docket: 59823797

Published

claim is reviewed for fundamental error. Rule 3.710(b) provides that when a criminal defendant refuses

Category: Criminal Procedure

Robert Craft v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 2021 | Docket: 59682244

Published

phase, the trial court ordered a PSI. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.710(b) (“Should a defendant in a capital case

Category: Criminal Procedure

Robert Craft v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 2020 | Docket: 18647261

Published

phase, the trial court ordered a PSI. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.710(b) (“Should a defendant in a capital case

Category: Criminal Procedure

Slinger v. State

268 So. 3d 922

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2019 | Docket: 64711811

Published

Levandoski v. State, 245 So.3d 643, 646 (Fla. 2018). Rule 3.710 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure instructs

Category: Criminal Procedure

Slinger v. State

268 So. 3d 922

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2019 | Docket: 64711812

Published

Levandoski v. State, 245 So.3d 643, 646 (Fla. 2018). Rule 3.710 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure instructs

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure - 2018 Regular-Cycle Report

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 2018 | Docket: 7471972

Published

sentence exceeding the statutory maximum. Rule 3.710(a) (Presentence Report; Cases in Which Court

Category: Criminal Procedure

James Barnes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 25, 2018 | Docket: 6375349

Published

refuses to present mitigation evidence. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.710(b) (requiring the preparation of a “comprehensive”

Category: Criminal Procedure

James Barnes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

888 F.3d 1148

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 25, 2018 | Docket: 6375166

Published

mitigation evidence. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.710(b) (requiring the preparation of a "comprehensive"

Category: Criminal Procedure

Callaway v. State

202 So. 3d 901, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14505

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2016 | Docket: 4426701

Published

DCA 1994) (holding that the plain language of rule 3.710(a) requires a trial court to order a presentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Roberts v. State

185 So. 3d 542, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 362, 2016 WL 104343

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2016 | Docket: 60253596

Published

prior to.the petitioner’s sentencing. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.710(a); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(2)(A)(ii)d; Hernandez

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mitchell E. Fox v. State of Florida

166 So. 3d 894, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8479, 2015 WL 3486645

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 2015 | Docket: 2679287

Published

the “rendition” of a sentence contemplated by rule 3.710(1), so the timeliness of the motion is measured

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vidiek Rodriguez v. State

152 So. 3d 1290, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 176, 2015 WL 71684

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2015 | Docket: 2621534

Published

presentence investigation report as required by rule 3.710(a). The state agrees that Rodriguez may be entitled

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wiggins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 2014 | Docket: 2618728

Published

isn’t all that long ago, including 2 See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.710(a) § 921.231(1), Fla. Stat. (2013) (providing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cloutier v. State

930 So. 2d 841, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9646, 2006 WL 1627492

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2006 | Docket: 64845224

Published

investigation report before sentencing. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.710; see also Gibson v. State, 817 So.2d 1084

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

886 So. 2d 197, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 568, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 1746, 2004 WL 2248209

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2004 | Docket: 64834033

Published

abrogate the existing rule 4 — 3.5(d)(4) procedure. Rule 3.710, Presentence Report, is amended, as proposed

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Vesquez

755 So. 2d 674, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8694, 1999 WL 436799

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1999 | Docket: 64796724

Published

(“PSI”). See § 985.233(2), Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.710. At the end of the plea conference, the sheriff

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wyatt v. State

714 So. 2d 663, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9698, 1998 WL 429132

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1998 | Docket: 64781882

Published

report, but did not exercise that discretion. Rule 3.710 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Spencer v. State

608 So. 2d 545, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12045, 1992 WL 336074

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1992 | Docket: 64692039

Published

PER CURIAM. Pursuant to Rule 3.710, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, we vacate the sentence and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Aguado v. State

598 So. 2d 1077, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5419, 1992 WL 98835

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1992 | Docket: 64667453

Published

the resolution of the sentencing issue. Under Rule 3.710 of the Fla.R.Crim.P., the appellant, as a first

Category: Criminal Procedure

Eugene G. Adams v. Richard L. Dugger, Superintendent, Florida Dept. Of Corrections

850 F.2d 1495, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10292, 1988 WL 72805

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 2, 1988 | Docket: 815636

Published

sentencing in non-capital cases. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.710. The Constitution does not. Lockett

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gitman v. State

482 So. 2d 367

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1986 | Docket: 1769139

Published

because the sentencing guidelines provided by Rule 3.710, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, were not

Category: Criminal Procedure

Florida Bar

443 So. 2d 972, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 3182

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1983 | Docket: 64602139

Published

amendment to Rule 9.140. That statute and Criminal Rule 3.710 authorize an appeal, both by the state and by

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mills v. State

424 So. 2d 866, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22237

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1982 | Docket: 64594504

Published

may obtain a presentence report, pursuant to Rule 3.710 and thereafter resentence appellant. De Oca v

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

404 So. 2d 1165, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21403

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1981 | Docket: 64585589

Published

State, 309 So.2d 591 (Fla.2d DCA 1975); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.710. SCHEB, C. J., and GRIMES, J., concur.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Damm v. State

402 So. 2d 52, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20730

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 1981 | Docket: 64584542

Published

order a pre-sentence report in accordance with Rule 3.710, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and thereafter

Category: Criminal Procedure

Purwin v. State

385 So. 2d 165, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16653

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1980 | Docket: 64576901

Published

appellant to three consecutive life sentences. Rule 3.710, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (1977),

Category: Criminal Procedure

Henderson v. State

378 So. 2d 1328, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15461

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1980 | Docket: 64573823

Published

investigation when prior felony convictions (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.710) were not established. After oral argument

Category: Criminal Procedure

Watson v. State

371 So. 2d 237, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15087

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1979 | Docket: 64570301

Published

must, however, vacate the sentence and remand. Rule 3.710, Fla.R.Crim.P., provides that the court may not

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Brunson

369 So. 2d 945, 1979 Fla. LEXIS 4637

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 1979 | Docket: 64569678

Published

order a presentence investigation violated Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.710. We disagree. The primary question before

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 3.710

362 So. 2d 655

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 1978 | Docket: 64566154

Published

June 30, 1978), holding the second sentence of Rule 3.710, which mandates presentence investigation reports

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

355 So. 2d 857, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15434

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1978 | Docket: 64563168

Published

Section 921.231, Florida Statutes (1975), and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.710. We hold that a trial judge’s announcement

Category: Criminal Procedure

Porter v. State

354 So. 2d 470, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15159

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1978 | Docket: 64562522

Published

pre-sentence investigation (P.S.I.) pursuant to Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.710. Subsequently, defense counsel’s motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brunson v. State

355 So. 2d 812, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15411

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 1978 | Docket: 64563146

Published

presentence investigation in violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.710. Andrews v. State, 309 So.2d 576 (Fla. 1st

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 3.710

362 So. 2d 655, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 4115

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 1977 | Docket: 64566153

Published

initiates this proceeding to consider revision of Rule 3.710 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davies v. State

343 So. 2d 965, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15538

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1977 | Docket: 64557719

Published

remanded for proceedings complying with Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.710. Andrews v. State, 309 So.2d 576 (Fla.1st

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rinaldi v. State

343 So. 2d 94, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15427

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1977 | Docket: 64557462

Published

pre-sentence investigation in violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.710. The motion for new trial was denied and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johns v. State

330 So. 2d 526, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15033

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 1976 | Docket: 64553391

Published

judge fatally erred in failing to comply with Rule 3.710 RCrP, thus squarely presenting the point which

Category: Criminal Procedure

Deoca v. State

326 So. 2d 453

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1976 | Docket: 64552447

Published

trial judge failed to follow the provisions of Rule 3.710, FRCrP, which provides, in part, that no sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Buckles v. State

310 So. 2d 748, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14067

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1975 | Docket: 64545561

Published

S. 921.23, insofar as it is in conflict with Rule 3.710 RCrP is unconstitutional and therefore not controlling

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nordone v. State

307 So. 2d 907, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14678

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1975 | Docket: 64544377

Published

Under the Florida rules of criminal procedure (Rule 3.710), a presen-tence investigation is mandatory where

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gibbs v. Wainwright

303 So. 2d 7, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4522

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1974 | Docket: 64542445

Published

report, we find this claim to be without merit. Rule 3.710, Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides in part

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

297 So. 2d 67

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1974 | Docket: 1510402

Published

investigation he says was required by Criminal Rule 3.710, 33 F.S.A., both because this was his "first"

Category: Criminal Procedure

Barber v. State

288 So. 2d 281, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8171

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1974 | Docket: 64536588

Published

is required under Rule 3.710, CrPR, 33 F.S.A. The rule is as follows: “Rule 3.710 Presentence Report

Category: Criminal Procedure