Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.702 - SENTENCING GUIDELINES (1994) | Syfert Law

Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.702

RULE 3.702. SENTENCING GUIDELINES (1994)

(a) Use. This rule is to be used in conjunction with the forms
located at rule 3.990. This rule is intended to implement the 1994
revised sentencing guidelines in strict accordance with chapter 921,
Florida Statutes, as revised by chapter 93-406, Laws of Florida.

(b) Purpose and Construction. The purpose of the 1994
revised sentencing guidelines and the principles they embody are
set out in subsection 921.001(4). Existing caselaw construing the
application of sentencing guidelines that is in conflict with the
provisions of this rule or the statement of purpose or the principles
embodied by the 1994 sentencing guidelines set out in subsection
921.001(4) is superseded by the operation of this rule.

(c) Offense Severity Ranking. Felony offenses subject to
the 1994 revised sentencing guidelines are listed in a single offense
severity ranking chart located at section 921.0012. The offense
severity ranking chart employs 10 offense levels, ranked from least
severe to most severe. Each felony offense is assigned to a level
according to the severity of the offense, commensurate with the
harm or potential for harm to the community that is caused by the
offense. Felony offenses not listed in section 921.0012 are to be
assigned a severity level as described in section 921.0013.

(d) General Rules and Definitions.

(1) A comprehensive guidelines scoresheet shall be
prepared for each defendant covering all offenses pending before the
court for sentencing, including offenses for which the defendant has
been adjudicated an habitual felony offender or an habitual violent
felony offender. The office of the state attorney or the probation
services office, or both where appropriate, will prepare the
scoresheets and present them to defense counsel for review as to
accuracy. Where the defendant is alleged to have violated probation
or community control and probation services will recommend
revocation, probation services shall prepare a comprehensive
guidelines scoresheet for use at sentencing after revocation of
probation or community control. The sentencing judge shall review
the scoresheet for accuracy.

(2) “Conviction” means a determination of guilt
resulting from plea or trial, regardless of whether adjudication was
withheld or whether imposition of sentence was suspended.

(3) “Primary offense” is the offense pending for
sentencing that results in the highest number of total sentence
points. Only one offense may be scored as the primary offense.

(4) “Additional offense” is any offense, other than the
primary offense, pending before the court for sentencing. Sentence
points for additional offenses are determined by the severity level
and the number of offenses at a particular severity level.
Misdemeanors are scored at level “M” regardless of degree.

(5) “Victim injury” is scored for physical injury or death
suffered by a person as a direct result of any offense pending before
the court for sentencing. If an offense pending before the court for
sentencing involves sexual penetration, victim injury is to be
scored. If an offense pending before the court for sentencing
involves sexual contact, but no penetration, victim injury shall be
scored. If the victim of an offense involving sexual penetration or
sexual contact without penetration suffers any physical injury as a
direct result of an offense pending before the court for sentencing,
that physical injury is to be scored separately and in addition to
any points scored for the sexual contact or sexual penetration.

Victim injury shall be scored for each victim physically injured
and for each offense resulting in physical injury whether there are
one or more victims. However, if the victim injury is the result of a
crime of which the defendant has been acquitted, it shall not be
scored.

(6) Attempts, conspiracies, and solicitations charged
under chapter 777 are scored at severity levels below the level at
which the completed offense is located. Attempts and solicitations
are scored 2 severity levels below the completed offense. Criminal
conspiracies are scored 1 severity level below the completed offense.

(7) “Total offense score” results from adding the
sentence points for primary offense, additional offense, and victim
injury.

(8) “Prior record” refers to any conviction for an offense
committed by the defendant prior to the commission of the primary
offense. Prior record shall include convictions for offenses
committed by the defendant as an adult or as a juvenile,
convictions by federal, out-of-state, military, or foreign courts, and
convictions for violations of county or municipal ordinances that
incorporate by reference a penalty under state law. Federal, out-of-
state, military, or foreign convictions are scored at the severity level
at which the analogous or parallel Florida crime is located.

(A) Convictions for offenses committed more than
10 years prior to the date of the commission of the primary offense
are not scored as prior record if the defendant has not been
convicted of any other crime for a period of 10 consecutive years
from the most recent date of release from confinement, supervision,
or other sanction, which-ever is later, to the date of the commission
of the primary offense.
(B) Juvenile dispositions of offenses committed by
the defendant within 3 years prior to the date of the commission of
the primary offense are scored as prior record if the offense would
have been a crime if committed by an adult. Juvenile dispositions of
sexual offenses committed by the defendant more than 3 years prior
to the date of the primary offense are to be scored as prior record if
the defendant has not maintained a conviction-free record, either as
an adult or as a juvenile, for a period of 3 consecutive years from
the most recent date of release from confinement, supervision, or
sanction, whichever is later, to the date of commission of the
primary offense.

(C) Entries in criminal histories that show no
disposition, disposition unknown, arrest only, or a disposition other
than conviction shall not be scored. Criminal history records
expunged or sealed under section 943.058 or other provisions of
law, including former sections 893.14 and 901.33, shall be scored
as prior record where the defendant whose record has been
expunged or sealed is before the court for sentencing.

(D) Any uncertainty in the scoring of the
defendant’s prior record shall be resolved in favor of the defendant,
and disagreement as to the propriety of scoring specific entries in
the prior record shall be resolved by the sentencing judge.

(E) When unable to determine whether the
conviction to be scored as prior record is a felony or a
misdemeanor, the conviction should be scored as a misdemeanor.
When the degree of felony is ambiguous or the severity level cannot
be deter-mined, the conviction should be scored at severity level 1.

(9) “Legal status violations” occur when a defendant,
while under any of the forms of legal status listed in subsection
921.0011(3), commits an offense that results in conviction. Legal
status violations receive a score of 4 sentence points and are scored
when the offense committed while under legal status is before the
court for sentencing. Points for a legal status violation are to be
assessed only once regardless of the existence of more than one
form of legal status at the time an offense is committed or the
number of offenses committed while under any form of legal status.
(10) “Release program violations” occur when the
defendant is found to have violated a condition of a release program
designated in subsection 921.0011(6). Six points shall be assessed
for each violation up to a maximum of 18 points in the case of
multiple violations. Where there are multiple violations, points in
excess of 6 may be assessed only for each successive violation that
follows the reinstatement or modification of the release program
and are not to be assessed for violation of several conditions of a
single release program order.

(11) “Total prior record score” results from adding
sentence points for prior record, legal status violations, and release
program violations.

(12) Possession of a firearm, destructive device,
semiautomatic weapon, or a machine gun during the commission or
attempt to commit a crime will result in additional sentence points.
Eighteen sentence points shall be assessed where the defendant is
convicted of committing or attempting to commit any felony other
than those enumerated in subsection 775.087(2) while having in his
or her possession a firearm as defined in subsection 790.001(6) or a
destructive device as defined in subsection 790.001(4). Twenty-five
sentence points shall be assessed where the offender is convicted of
committing or attempting to commit any felony other than those
enumerated in subsection 775.087(2) while having in his or her
possession a semiautomatic weapon as defined in subsection
775.087(2) or a machine gun as defined in subsection 790.001(9).

(13) “Subtotal sentence points” result from adding the
total offense score, the total prior record score, and any additional
points for possession of a firearm, destructive device,
semiautomatic weapon, or machine gun.

(14) If the primary offense is drug trafficking under
section 893.135, the subtotal sentence points may be multiplied, at
the discretion of the sentencing court, by a factor of 1.5. If the
primary offense is a violation of the Law Enforcement Protection Act
under subsections 775.0823(2), (3), (4), or (5), the subtotal sentence
points shall be multiplied by a factor of 2. If the primary offense is a
violation of subsection 775.087(2)(a)(2) or subsections 775.0823(6)
or (7), the subtotal sentence points shall be multiplied by a factor of
1.5. If both enhancements are applicable, only the enhancement
with the higher multiplier is to be used.

(15) “Total sentence points” result from the
enhancement, if applicable, of the subtotal sentence points. If no
enhancement is applicable, the subtotal sentence points are the
total sentence points.

(16) “Presumptive sentence” is determined by the total
sentence points. If the total sentence points are less than or equal
to 40, the recommended sentence, absent a departure, shall not be
state prison. However, the sentencing court may increase sentence
points less than or equal to 40 by up to and including 15 percent to
arrive at total sentence points in excess of 40. If the total sentence
points are greater than 40 but less than or equal to 52, the decision
to sentence the defendant to state prison or a nonstate prison
sanction is left to the discretion of the sentencing court. If the total
sentence points are greater than 52, the sentence, absent a
departure, must be to state prison.

A state prison sentence is calculated by deducting 28 points
from the total sentence points where total sentence points exceed
40. The resulting number represents state prison months. State
prison months may be increased or decreased by up to and
including 25 percent at the discretion of the sentencing court. State
prison months may not be increased where the sentencing court
has exercised discretion to increase total sentence points under 40
points to achieve a state prison sentence. The sentence imposed
must be entered on the score-sheet.

(17) For those offenses having a mandatory penalty, a
scoresheet should be completed and the guidelines presumptive
sentence calculated. If the presumptive sentence is less than the
mandatory penalty, the mandatory sentence takes precedence. If
the presumptive sentence exceeds the mandatory sentence, the
presumptive sentence should be imposed.

(18) Departure from the recommended guidelines
sentence provided by the total sentence points should be avoided
unless there are circumstances or factors that reasonably justify
aggravating or mitigating the sentence. A state prison sentence that
deviates from the recommended prison sentence by more than 25
percent, a state prison sentence where the total sentence points are
equal to or less than 40, or a sentence other than state prison
where the total sentence points are greater than 52 must be
accompanied by a written statement delineating the reasons for
departure. Circumstances or factors that can be considered include,
but are not limited to, those listed in subsections 921.0016(3) and
(4). Reasons for departing from the recommended guidelines
sentence shall not include circumstances or factors relating to prior
arrests without conviction or charged offenses for which convictions
have not been obtained.

(A) If a sentencing judge imposes a sentence that
departs from the recommended guidelines sentence, the reasons for
departure shall be orally articulated at the time sentence is
imposed. Any departure sentence must be accompanied by a
written statement, signed by the sentencing judge, delineating the
reasons for departure. The written statement shall be filed in the
court file within 15 days of the date of sentencing. A written
transcription of orally stated reasons for departure articulated at
the time sentence was imposed is sufficient if it is signed by the
sentencing judge and filed in the court file within 15 days of the
date of sentencing. The sentencing judge may also list the written
reasons for departure in the space provided on the guidelines
scoresheet and shall sign the scoresheet.

(B) The written statement delineating the reasons
for departure shall be made a part of the record. The written
statement, if it is a separate document, must accompany the
guidelines scoresheet required to be provided to the Department of
Corrections pursuant to subsection 921.0014(5).

(19) The sentencing court shall impose or suspend
sentence for each separate count, as convicted. The total sentence
shall be within the guidelines sentence unless a departure is
ordered.
If a split sentence is imposed, the incarcerative portion of the
sentence must not deviate more than 25 percent from the
recommended guidelines prison sentence. The total sanction
(incarceration and community control or probation) shall not exceed
the term provided by general law or the guidelines recommended
sentence where the provisions of subsection 921.001(5) apply.

(20) Sentences imposed after revocation of probation or
community control must be in accordance with the guidelines.
Cumulative incarceration imposed after revocation of probation or
community control is subject to limitations imposed by the
guidelines. A violation of probation or community control may not
be the basis for a departure sentence.

Committee Notes

1993 Adoption. (d)(1) If sentences are imposed under
section 775.084 and the sentencing guidelines, a scoresheet listing
only those offenses sentenced under the sentencing guidelines must
be prepared and utilized in lieu of the comprehensive scoresheet.

Due to ethical considerations, defense counsel may not be
compelled to submit or sign a scoresheet.

(d)(3) The primary offense need not be the highest ranked
offense pending for sentencing where scoring the less severe offense
as the primary offense will result in higher total sentence points.
This can occur where the multipliers for drug trafficking or
violations of the Law Enforcement Protection Act are applied or
where past convictions can be included as prior record that could
not be scored if the offense ranked at a higher severity level was the
primary offense.

(d)(16) The presumptive sentence is assumed to be
appropriate for the composite score of the defendant. Where the
total sentence points do not exceed 40, the court has the flexibility
to impose any lawful term of probation with or without a period of
incarceration as a condition of probation, a county jail term alone,
or any nonincarcerative disposition. Any sentence may include a
requirement that a fine be paid.

Cases Citing Rule 3.702

Total Results: 157

Heggs v. State

759 So. 2d 620, 2000 WL 178052

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2000 | Docket: 1421324

Cited 311 times | Published

001(4)(b)2., Fla. Stat. (1995); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702; Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.991. Under the 1995 guidelines

Category: Criminal Procedure

Maddox v. State

760 So. 2d 89

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2000 | Docket: 1324543

Cited 171 times | Published

during the sentencing hearing as required by rule 3.702(d)(18)(A), but filed written reasons for departure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Seagrave v. State

802 So. 2d 281, 2001 WL 776269

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2001 | Docket: 1699005

Cited 71 times | Published

result of this legislation, this Court adopted rule 3.702(d)(5), which provided "Victim injury" is scored

Category: Criminal Procedure

White v. State

714 So. 2d 440, 1998 WL 309060

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1998 | Docket: 1513771

Cited 32 times | Published

sentencing worksheet score under the provisions of rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Capers v. State

678 So. 2d 330, 1996 WL 399857

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1996 | Docket: 1470847

Cited 29 times | Published

superseded." *333 628 So.2d at 1084; see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(b). Capers also argues that the double counting

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dautel v. State

658 So. 2d 88, 1995 WL 424183

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1995 | Docket: 1525053

Cited 27 times | Published

prepared by the state attorney's *91 office); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(1) (1994) (sentencing judge shall review

Category: Criminal Procedure

Peters v. State

128 So. 3d 832, 2013 WL 6083405, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18426

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 2013 | Docket: 60237174

Cited 24 times | Published

pending before the court for sentencing.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.702(d)(5). “At the sentencing proceeding the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gardner v. State

661 So. 2d 1274, 1995 WL 627460

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1995 | Docket: 1526402

Cited 16 times | Published

sentenced under the 1994 sentencing guidelines.[5] Rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Martinez v. State

692 So. 2d 199, 1997 WL 30812

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1997 | Docket: 436342

Cited 14 times | Published

victim injury has been properly scored under Rule 3.702 and subsections 921.0011(7) and 921.0014(1),

Category: Criminal Procedure

Batchelor v. State

729 So. 2d 956, 1999 WL 22429

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1999 | Docket: 2275662

Cited 12 times | Published

Appellant argues that the trial court's reliance upon rule 3.702(d)(2) as the basis for denying his challenge

Category: Criminal Procedure

Galloway v. State

680 So. 2d 616, 1996 WL 577393

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1996 | Docket: 1201485

Cited 12 times | Published

principles of double jeopardy. But we construe rule 3.702(d)(12) as inapplicable to convictions of these

Category: Criminal Procedure

Laines v. State

662 So. 2d 1248, 1995 WL 353512

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1995 | Docket: 1683519

Cited 12 times | Published

sentencing. § 921.0016(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(18)(A); see § 921.001(4)(b)(2), Fla. Stat

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sewall v. State

783 So. 2d 1171, 2001 WL 394878

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2001 | Docket: 1259643

Cited 11 times | Published

2d [1084] at 1084 [(Fla.1993)]; see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(b) (emphasis added). Id. It is clear from

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Colbert

660 So. 2d 701, 1995 WL 555308

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 1995 | Docket: 1755760

Cited 11 times | Published

justice. However, since section 921.0016(1)(c) and rule 3.702(d)(18) now allow fifteen days in which to file

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

717 So. 2d 1057, 1998 WL 476269

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1998 | Docket: 1681408

Cited 9 times | Published

articulate departure reasons at sentencing under Rule 3.702(d)(18)(A), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Madrigal v. State

683 So. 2d 1093, 1996 WL 668423

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1996 | Docket: 1514982

Cited 9 times | Published

assault on law enforcement officer); cf. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(14) (1995) (which does not provide enhancement

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Davidson

666 So. 2d 941, 1995 WL 757916

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1995 | Docket: 452524

Cited 9 times | Published

points to the guidelines scoresheet pursuant to rule 3.702(d)(12) which states: Possession of a firearm

Category: Criminal Procedure

Anderson v. State

865 So. 2d 640, 2004 WL 256978

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2004 | Docket: 1231690

Cited 8 times | Published

777.04(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1993); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(6). Anderson's correct primary offense

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Aguilar

775 So. 2d 994, 2000 WL 1817038

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 2000 | Docket: 1668002

Cited 8 times | Published

(1997); or within fifteen days as required by rule 3.702(d)(18)(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jupiter v. State

833 So. 2d 169, 2002 WL 31528583

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2002 | Docket: 1259185

Cited 7 times | Published

in Hudson occurred within the Heggs "window," rule 3.702(d)(5) controlled—"Victim injury shall be scored

Category: Criminal Procedure

Negron v. State

799 So. 2d 1126, 2001 WL 1432945

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2001 | Docket: 487002

Cited 7 times | Published

successfully completed probation. We agree and reverse. Rule 3.702(d)(2), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Myers v. State

696 So. 2d 893, 1997 WL 348762

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1997 | Docket: 1696249

Cited 7 times | Published

specifically as applicable to the present case Rule 3.702 (1994). There the term, `recommended sentence'

Category: Criminal Procedure

Waite v. City of Fort Lauderdale

681 So. 2d 901, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11110, 1996 WL 603787

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1996 | Docket: 1722208

Cited 7 times | Published

law." § 921.0011(5), Fla. Stat. (1995); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(8), 3.703(d)(15). It follows that if

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Hewitt

702 So. 2d 633, 1997 WL 783051

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1997 | Docket: 460214

Cited 6 times | Published

nonincarcerative disposition. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702 (1993 committee note to rule 3.702(d)(16)). As a result,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Green v. State

691 So. 2d 502, 1997 WL 97157

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1997 | Docket: 1423831

Cited 6 times | Published

represents, after deducting 28 points pursuant to Rule 3.702(d)(16), a recommended state prison term of 65

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

683 So. 2d 577, 1996 WL 648296

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1996 | Docket: 276474

Cited 6 times | Published

(Fla. 5th DCA 1995), we held that the meaning of rule 3.702(d)(12) was clear and any felony not enumerated

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harris v. State

658 So. 2d 1226, 1995 WL 481036

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 1995 | Docket: 439323

Cited 6 times | Published

primary offense. Additionally, in violation of rule 3.702(d)(5) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Williams

854 So. 2d 215, 2003 WL 21683482

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 2003 | Docket: 1294250

Cited 5 times | Published

points from Appellee's scoresheet because Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(5), in effect when Appellee committed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Annunziata v. State

697 So. 2d 997, 1997 WL 446924

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1997 | Docket: 1776641

Cited 5 times | Published

0011(3), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(9). Release program violations occurred

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ortiz v. State

696 So. 2d 916, 1997 WL 364513

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1997 | Docket: 1696294

Cited 5 times | Published

limit the prison term to be imposed. However, Rule 3.702(d)(19), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Norris v. State

659 So. 2d 1352, 1995 WL 525670

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1995 | Docket: 1462584

Cited 5 times | Published

(1993). [2] § 39.061, Fla. Stat. (1993). [3] Rule 3.702 was adopted "to implement the 1994 revised sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sims v. State

869 So. 2d 45, 2004 WL 399217

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2004 | Docket: 1653982

Cited 4 times | Published

wording in section 927.001(7)(a) (quoted above) and rule 3.702(d)(5) (discussed above), which both require that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Trotter v. State

801 So. 2d 1041, 2001 WL 1635500

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2001 | Docket: 1744734

Cited 4 times | Published

forth in rule 3.702(14) of the 1994 version of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure: Rule 3.702. Sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Estrada v. State

787 So. 2d 94, 2001 WL 293148

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2001 | Docket: 1496247

Cited 4 times | Published

the inclusion of a discretionary multiplier. Rule 3.702(14) provides that the multiplier may be applied

Category: Criminal Procedure

Louis v. State

764 So. 2d 930, 2000 WL 1189556

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2000 | Docket: 1516427

Cited 4 times | Published

penetration, victim injury shall be scored." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(5). Sexual contact is not specifically

Category: Criminal Procedure

Matthews v. State

774 So. 2d 1, 2000 WL 627653

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 2000 | Docket: 1330694

Cited 4 times | Published

By that time, the sentencing guidelines and rule 3.702 had been amended. Rule 3.703(d)(22) and section

Category: Criminal Procedure

Asbell v. State

715 So. 2d 258, 1998 WL 394130

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1998 | Docket: 1716928

Cited 4 times | Published

the commission of the possession offense. Under rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Lemon

825 So. 2d 927, 2002 WL 1207707

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2002 | Docket: 1691155

Cited 3 times | Published

001(6), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1994); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(18) (1994); § 921.0016(3), (4), Fla.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mathis v. State

719 So. 2d 348, 1998 WL 673164

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1998 | Docket: 2532935

Cited 3 times | Published

assessment of eighteen points as an enhancement under Rule 3.702(d)(12). Nonetheless, Mathis is not entitled to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hoffman v. State

700 So. 2d 765, 1997 WL 631141

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1997 | Docket: 1719640

Cited 3 times | Published

Criminal Procedure, is applicable. However, Rule 3.702(d)(18)(A), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Walton

693 So. 2d 135, 1997 WL 249136

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1997 | Docket: 1524376

Cited 3 times | Published

principles of double jeopardy. But we construe *137 rule 3.702(d)(12) as inapplicable to convictions of these

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thornton v. State

679 So. 2d 871, 1996 WL 526176

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1996 | Docket: 2577384

Cited 3 times | Published

using a law enforcement multiplier is found in rule 3.702(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (1995)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Palmer v. State

681 So. 2d 767, 1996 WL 514599

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1996 | Docket: 1385492

Cited 3 times | Published

of a firearm or destructive device. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(14). This error requires correction and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Capers v. State

670 So. 2d 967, 1995 WL 746370

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1995 | Docket: 1245654

Cited 3 times | Published

Guidelines, 628 So.2d 1084, 1089 (Fla.1993); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(b).[7] We therefore conclude that the victim's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wilcox v. State

664 So. 2d 55, 1995 WL 722906

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1995 | Docket: 1656078

Cited 3 times | Published

directives of the most recent guidelines rule: Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(18). That rule became effective January 1

Category: Criminal Procedure

Moore v. State

859 So. 2d 613, 2003 WL 22799303

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 2003 | Docket: 1284567

Cited 2 times | Published

sentence unless a written reason is given"); Fla. R. Crim P. 3.702(d)(19) & 3.703(d)(31) ("The sentencing court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Key v. State

837 So. 2d 535, 2003 WL 288963

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2003 | Docket: 1527515

Cited 2 times | Published

crime of which the defendant is acquitted. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(5). In this case, Key was acquitted of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

784 So. 2d 524, 2001 WL 417331

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2001 | Docket: 1744102

Cited 2 times | Published

completed crime. Thus, section 777.04(4)(a) and rule 3.702(d)(6) require that attempted second degree murder

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lowe v. State

742 So. 2d 350, 1999 WL 606475

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1999 | Docket: 1302924

Cited 2 times | Published

Sentencing Guidelines, 628 So.2d 1084 (Fla.1993). Rule 3.702(d)(5) provided for scoring of victim injury for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ackerman v. State

737 So. 2d 1145, 1999 WL 410316

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1999 | Docket: 1709587

Cited 2 times | Published

whether there are one or more victims." Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.702(d)(5) (emphasis added). "`Victim injury'

Category: Criminal Procedure

Schmiel v. State

727 So. 2d 257, 1999 WL 68450

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1999 | Docket: 1438427

Cited 2 times | Published

by a convicted felon. We reasoned that neither rule 3.702(d)(12)[1] of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rager v. State

720 So. 2d 1134, 1998 WL 769782

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1998 | Docket: 1371808

Cited 2 times | Published

analogy cannot be drawn. [5] Although Rager cites rule 3.702, rule 3.703 applies because his offenses were

Category: Criminal Procedure

McDonald v. State

714 So. 2d 643, 1998 WL 422781

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1998 | Docket: 1513805

Cited 2 times | Published

convicted felon.[2] The Court determined that rule 3.702(d)(12) and section 921.0014, Florida Statutes

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cruz v. State

674 So. 2d 802, 1996 WL 229049

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1996 | Docket: 1148553

Cited 2 times | Published

the guidelines recommended sentence...." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(19) *803 (1996); see Gonzalez v. State

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jenkins v. State

661 So. 2d 411, 1995 WL 608506

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1995 | Docket: 1526435

Cited 2 times | Published

2d 1084, 1089 (Fla. 1993). In accordance with rule 3.702, "[f]elony offenses not listed in section 921

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

658 So. 2d 1249, 1995 WL 497299

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1995 | Docket: 1885036

Cited 2 times | Published

his criminal history may be scored. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(8)(E). This scoresheet is not saved merely

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hampton v. State

135 So. 3d 440, 2014 WL 982667, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3596

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2014 | Docket: 60239638

Cited 1 times | Published

level below the completed offense. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.702(d)(6). . We note that the Second District

Category: Criminal Procedure

Seccia v. State

786 So. 2d 12, 2001 WL 328562

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2001 | Docket: 1681964

Cited 1 times | Published

sentencing can be scored on the scoresheet under rule 3.702(d)(5). To answer this question, it will be helpful

Category: Criminal Procedure

Maddox v. State

760 So. 2d 89, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 367, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 906

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2000 | Docket: 64797897

Cited 1 times | Published

during the sentencing hearing as required by rule 3.702(d)(18)(A), but filed written reasons for departure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cauble v. State

742 So. 2d 422, 1999 WL 770680

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1999 | Docket: 2590363

Cited 1 times | Published

So.2d 916 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(19); § 921.001(5), Fla. Stat. (1997)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

724 So. 2d 652, 1999 WL 12696

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1999 | Docket: 1733958

Cited 1 times | Published

he was being sentenced in this case. Although rule 3.702(d)(12) provides 18 points are to be assessed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carridine v. State

721 So. 2d 818, 1998 WL 876973

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1998 | Docket: 1694466

Cited 1 times | Published

State, 664 So.2d 55, 56 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (Rule 3.702(d)(18) "require(s) some form of writing, and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mohn v. State

723 So. 2d 873, 1998 WL 845889

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1998 | Docket: 1311986

Cited 1 times | Published

additional points for firearm possession. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(12). Mohn reserved his right to appeal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bush v. State

687 So. 2d 312, 1997 WL 26645

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1997 | Docket: 1290510

Cited 1 times | Published

087(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1995). See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(12); Palmer v. State, 667 So.2d 1018

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stepps v. State

675 So. 2d 1008, 1996 WL 329596

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1996 | Docket: 2540820

Cited 1 times | Published

to offenses committed before 1994. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(a); § 921.001(4)(b)2, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Miguel Angel Alfonso-Roche v. State of Florida

199 So. 3d 941, 2016 WL 3065576, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8352

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2016 | Docket: 3071354

Published

guidelines, both orally and in writing. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(18) (1994). This court reviewed such

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodriguez-Aguilar v. State

198 So. 3d 792, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3601, 2016 WL 886225

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2016 | Docket: 3044949

Published

4 . 'See, e.g,, Fla. R.Crim. P'.'3.702(d)(18).(requiring a trial court, .in imposing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Blair v. State

181 So. 3d 1250, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19349, 2015 WL 9437999

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 2015 | Docket: 60252541

Published

offenses.. See § 921.002, Fla. Stat. (2013); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(20) (“Sentences imposed after revocation

Category: Criminal Procedure

McPherson v. State

198 So. 3d 675, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19155, 2015 WL 9311400

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2015 | Docket: 3023597

Published

sentence with written findings.” § 921.001(5); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.702(d)(18)(A); see also Jenigen v. State

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tony Murphy v. State of Florida

161 So. 3d 1282

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 2015 | Docket: 2647163

Published

3.704(d)(27)(A) contains similar language to rule 3.702(d)(18)(A), it applies only to downward

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cheaves v. State

19 So. 3d 451, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16072, 2009 WL 3446756

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2009 | Docket: 60254644

Published

the “Release Program Violation” line. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(1). The court shall forward the corrected

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hoag v. State

12 So. 3d 907, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9331, 2009 WL 1940815

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 2009 | Docket: 1646631

Published

04(2), 921.0012(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (1995); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(c) & (d)(6), 3.990; see also Hoag v. State

Category: Criminal Procedure

Baez v. State

9 So. 3d 705, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3245, 2009 WL 1025413

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2009 | Docket: 2548566

Published

before the court for sentencing." Furthermore, rule 3.702(d)(4) defines an "additional offense" as "any

Category: Criminal Procedure

Urquhart v. State

967 So. 2d 397, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16468, 2007 WL 3033514

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2007 | Docket: 64852801

Published

must be within the guidelines range. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(19) (“The sentencing court shall impose

Category: Criminal Procedure

Perez v. State

959 So. 2d 413, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9528, 2007 WL 1754660

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2007 | Docket: 64851279

Published

Affirmed. See § 775.087(2), Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(12); Grantham v. State, 735 So.2d 525

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carpenter v. State

917 So. 2d 962, 2005 WL 3487806

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2005 | Docket: 1509645

Published

probation. § 921.001(5), Fla. Stat. (1995); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(19); Mays v. State, 717 So.2d 515, 516

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vera v. State

886 So. 2d 251, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15407, 2004 WL 2347562

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2004 | Docket: 64834052

Published

injury points could properly be assessed. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(5). See Brown v. State, 700 So.2d 447

Category: Criminal Procedure

Martin v. State

876 So. 2d 1256, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9928, 2004 WL 1496649

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2004 | Docket: 64831656

Published

*1259Unlike rule 3.701 discussed in Peters, rule 3.702(d)(3) states that a “ ‘[p]rimary offense’ is

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carrigan v. State

873 So. 2d 605, 2004 WL 1175280

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2004 | Docket: 1732960

Published

discretionary with the sentencing court. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(14). See also Perez v. State, 804 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

873 So. 2d 547, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7070, 2004 WL 1123779

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2004 | Docket: 64830698

Published

So.2d 443 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(19).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sanders v. State

852 So. 2d 364, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12209, 2003 WL 21946399

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2003 | Docket: 64824386

Published

sentence does not comply with Fla. R.Crim. P. Rule 3.702(d)(19), when read in conjunction with § 921.001(5)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Torres v. State

847 So. 2d 614, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9235, 2003 WL 21414661

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2003 | Docket: 64823381

Published

an additional 18 sentence points are assessed; Rule 3.702(12) states in pertinent part: Eighteen sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Swain v. State

842 So. 2d 858, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 75, 2003 WL 43369

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2003 | Docket: 64822155

Published

guidelines without reason for a departure. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(19). In this case, the consecutive sentences

Category: Criminal Procedure

Timmer v. State

824 So. 2d 264, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12561, 2002 WL 31040367

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2002 | Docket: 64817062

Published

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d); Huff v. State, 639 So.2d 208 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994);

Category: Criminal Procedure

Espinoza v. State

821 So. 2d 379, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9673, 2002 WL 1466232

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2002 | Docket: 64816414

Published

section 921.0016(l)(c), Fla. Stat. (1993) and Rule 3.702(d)(18), Fla. R.Crim. P., his departure sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Perez v. State

804 So. 2d 1265, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 556, 2002 WL 90829

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2002 | Docket: 64811727

Published

0014(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1997). See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3 .702(d)(14) (providing that application of the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nelson v. State

802 So. 2d 470, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18025, 2001 WL 1635561

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2001 | Docket: 64811028

Published

record and not as additional offenses. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(4), (8). We have considered the other

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kiste v. State

790 So. 2d 1198, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10924, 2001 WL 871538

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 2001 | Docket: 64807265

Published

score-sheet. See § 921.0014, Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(10). Under the 1994 guidelines, Kiste

Category: Criminal Procedure

Schlachter v. State

780 So. 2d 293, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3404, 2001 WL 256029

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2001 | Docket: 64804348

Published

attached a 1994 guidelines seoresheet. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702 and 3.990. However, there appears to be

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gomez-Vicente v. State

774 So. 2d 957, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 277, 2001 WL 37815

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2001 | Docket: 64802798

Published

DCA 1996); § 921.004, Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(12). Affirmed in part; reversed in part

Category: Criminal Procedure

Copeland v. State

765 So. 2d 216, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9047, 2000 WL 990972

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2000 | Docket: 64799701

Published

prepared for each offense. In accordance with Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(10), “release program violation” points

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mundinac v. State

739 So. 2d 1261, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11123, 1999 WL 629899

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1999 | Docket: 64790514

Published

White court, in dealing with subsection (12) of Rule 3.702(d), held: [W]here the possession of a firearm

Category: Criminal Procedure

Meriweather v. State

740 So. 2d 1210, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10602, 1999 WL 586979

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1999 | Docket: 64790831

Published

sentence points are assessed. See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(12) (eighteen additional sentence points

Category: Criminal Procedure

Whittaker v. State

734 So. 2d 1152, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7212, 1999 WL 346129

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1999 | Docket: 64788737

Published

was grand theft of a firearm. See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(12). Whit-taker did not commit any other

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carder v. State

731 So. 2d 784, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4895, 1999 WL 218189

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1999 | Docket: 64787995

Published

propriety of assessing 25 points pursuant *785to rule 3.702(12) because of White. In this case, the assessment

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stone v. State

724 So. 2d 194, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 644, 1999 WL 30357

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1999 | Docket: 64785489

Published

v. State, 293 So.2d 44, 45 (Fla.1974); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(18)(A); § 921.001(6), Fla. Stat. (1995)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Theodore v. State

722 So. 2d 271, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15963, 1998 WL 879570

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1998 | Docket: 64784921

Published

. § 790.01(2), Fla. Slat. (1997). . Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(12).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Daniels v. State

721 So. 2d 717, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 571, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 2110, 1998 WL 750907

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1998 | Docket: 64784624

Published

firearm by a convicted felon. We reasoned that rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Odom v. State

719 So. 2d 351, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12722, 1998 WL 698273

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1998 | Docket: 64783582

Published

not be added to a defendant’s score pursuant to rule 3.702(d) for possession of a firearm if the only crime

Category: Criminal Procedure

Moody v. State

717 So. 2d 627, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12281, 1998 WL 653605

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1998 | Docket: 64782828

Published

deviation permitted under the guidelines. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(18). Nevertheless, we reverse and remand

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. McCandless

717 So. 2d 192, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11825, 1998 WL 637154

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1998 | Docket: 64782699

Published

Hill, 698 So.2d 647 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(18)(A). COBB, GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. West

718 So. 2d 266, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11316, 1998 WL 558987

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1998 | Docket: 64783174

Published

State, 664 So.2d 55 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(18). . Domberg v. State, 661 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mathis v. State

717 So. 2d 587, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11283, 1998 WL 560135

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1998 | Docket: 64782799

Published

23 Fla. L. Weekly S311 (Fla. June 12, 1998). Rule 3.702(d)(12) Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Scott v. State

718 So. 2d 751, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 421, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1483, 1998 WL 608230

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1998 | Docket: 64783373

Published

placed particular importance on the language of rule 3.702(d)(12) that expressly provided assessment of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fisher v. State

718 So. 2d 753, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 422, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1476, 1998 WL 608236

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1998 | Docket: 64783374

Published

firearm by a convicted felon. In other words, rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cole v. State

716 So. 2d 325, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10359, 1998 WL 472545

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1998 | Docket: 64782373

Published

committed on or after October 1, 1995. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(14); § 775.0823(2), Fla. Stat. (1995)

Category: Criminal Procedure

King v. State

715 So. 2d 256, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 404, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1329, 1998 WL 394172

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1998 | Docket: 64782020

Published

convicted felon. In other words, we held that rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Walton

717 So. 2d 522, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 402, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1317, 1998 WL 394009

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1998 | Docket: 64782781

Published

convicted felon. In other words, we held that rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sullivan v. State

717 So. 2d 520, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 402, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1327, 1998 WL 394192

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1998 | Docket: 64782779

Published

firearm by a convicted felon. In other words, rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Scott v. State

717 So. 2d 521, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 402, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1331, 1998 WL 394170

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1998 | Docket: 64782780

Published

convicted felon. In other words, we held that rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ferry v. State

714 So. 2d 460, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 403, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1324, 1998 WL 394202

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1998 | Docket: 64781842

Published

firearm by a convicted felon. In other words, rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vela v. State

717 So. 2d 519, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 403, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1325, 1998 WL 394182

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1998 | Docket: 64782778

Published

convicted felon. In other words, we held that rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Shiver v. State

717 So. 2d 524, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 401, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1330, 1998 WL 394174

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1998 | Docket: 64782783

Published

convicted felon. In other words, we held that rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mobley v. State

715 So. 2d 257, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 403, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1321, 1998 WL 394158

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1998 | Docket: 64782021

Published

firearm by a convicted felon. In other words, rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hanks v. State

717 So. 2d 523, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 401, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1326, 1998 WL 394179

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1998 | Docket: 64782782

Published

firearm by a convicted felon. In other words, rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Coleman v. State

713 So. 2d 987, 1998 WL 309077

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1998 | Docket: 2549329

Published

firearm by a convicted felon. In other words, rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

710 So. 2d 775, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 6524, 1998 WL 288382

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1998 | Docket: 64780933

Published

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(12); Wilkins v. State, 693 So.2d 62 (Fla. 5th DCA)

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Rules of Criminal Procedure-Sentencing Guidelines

711 So. 2d 27, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 181, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 604, 1998 WL 173098

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1998 | Docket: 64781037

Published

APPENDIX FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Rule 3.702. Sentencing Guidelines (1994). [No changes to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cauble v. State

779 So. 2d 276, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14083, 1997 WL 912913

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1997 | Docket: 64804069

Published

contain the trial court’s signature. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(18)(A). Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Adams v. State

702 So. 2d 1350, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14050, 1997 WL 770657

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1997 | Docket: 64777419

Published

case law prior to January 1, 1994, pursuant to rule 3.702(b), 3.703(b), Fla. R.Crim. P.1 We hold that the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Conners v. State

703 So. 2d 1161, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13664, 1997 WL 777829

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1997 | Docket: 64777925

Published

the lien. See § 27.56, Fla. Stat. (1995); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(1); Bourque v. State, 595 So.2d 222 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

702 So. 2d 600, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13351, 1997 WL 740780

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1997 | Docket: 64777292

Published

to contest the amount of the lien. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(1); Bourque v. State, 595 So.2d 222 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ferry v. State

701 So. 2d 660, 1997 WL 721991

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1997 | Docket: 309849

Published

but the language remains unchanged from former Rule 3.702(d)(12).

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Vela

700 So. 2d 779, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11851, 1997 WL 637646

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 1997 | Docket: 64776326

Published

sentencing guidelines and is essentially the same as rule 3.702(d)(12) of the 1994 sentencing guidelines, which

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Watkins

698 So. 2d 837, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 531, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1356, 1997 WL 545817

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1997 | Docket: 64775551

Published

section 921.0014(1), Florida Statutes (1993), and rule 3.702(d)(16), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

697 So. 2d 1309, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9466, 1997 WL 473676

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1997 | Docket: 64775399

Published

921.0016(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1995), and rule 3.702(d)(18), Florida Rules Criminal Procedures. On

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ford v. State

695 So. 2d 933, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7243, 1997 WL 356524

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1997 | Docket: 64774387

Published

to contest the amount of the lien. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(1); Bourque v. State, 595 So.2d 222 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carter v. State

694 So. 2d 887, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6537, 1997 WL 318042

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1997 | Docket: 64774105

Published

years prior to the instant offense. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(B)(A). Furthermore, costs of prosecution

Category: Criminal Procedure

Schierer v. State

694 So. 2d 868, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6199, 1997 WL 306976

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1997 | Docket: 64774094

Published

sentence. See § 921.0014(1), Fla Stat. (1993); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(16) (“State prison months may not be increased

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Clary

694 So. 2d 108, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5617, 1997 WL 270616

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 1997 | Docket: 64773869

Published

1993, and therefore section 921.0016(l)(e) and rule 3.702(d)(18), do not apply in this case. The statute

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cobb v. State

691 So. 2d 574, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3770, 1997 WL 169521

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1997 | Docket: 64772453

Published

his criminal history may be scored. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(8)(E). This scoresheet is not saved merely

Category: Criminal Procedure

Henderson v. State

689 So. 2d 1196, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2126, 1997 WL 106968

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1997 | Docket: 64771809

Published

which are applicable to his offense.1 Second, rule 3.702(d)(14) provides for a multiplier where “the primary

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Perry

687 So. 2d 831, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 74, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 21, 1997 WL 57235

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1997 | Docket: 64771047

Published

operation of rule 3.702 if the case law conflicts with rule 3.702. We hereby give effect to rule 3.702(b) by

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Simmons

687 So. 2d 827, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 64, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 19, 1997 WL 57204

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1997 | Docket: 64771046

Published

operation of rule 3.702 if the case law conflicts with rule 3.702. We hereby give effect to rule 3.702(b) by

Category: Criminal Procedure

Britt v. State

687 So. 2d 930, 1997 WL 47636

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1997 | Docket: 595737

Published

not been set forth in a written order. Under rule 3.702(d)(18)(A) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Roberts v. State

685 So. 2d 1277, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 5, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 2155, 1996 WL 726856

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1996 | Docket: 64770230

Published

the provisions of subsection 921.001(5) apply. Rule 3.702(d)(19) (emphasis added). On appeal, the First

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lee v. State

696 So. 2d 774, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12325, 1996 WL 670445

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1996 | Docket: 64774797

Published

written objection to the amount assessed. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(1); Wilson v. State, 675 So.2d 613 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Norton v. State

682 So. 2d 1232, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12242, 1996 WL 670556

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1996 | Docket: 64769035

Published

921.0016(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1995), and rule 3.702(d)(18), Florida Rules Criminal Procedures On

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jackson v. State

680 So. 2d 1102, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10476, 1996 WL 583171

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1996 | Docket: 64768125

Published

sentencing directly causes physical harm. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(5). REVERSED AND REMANDED. W. SHARP and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Watkins v. State

680 So. 2d 547, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7864, 1996 WL 413708

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1996 | Docket: 64767881

Published

these sanctions only in the disjunctive, the rule 3.702 guidelines have been construed in the same manner

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

677 So. 2d 393, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7842, 1996 WL 411389

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1996 | Docket: 64766319

Published

possession of a semiautomatic weapon. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(12). The state concedes that it presented

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Eaves

674 So. 2d 908, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5693, 1996 WL 293422

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1996 | Docket: 64765080

Published

delineating the reasons for departure as required by rule 3.702(d)(18) and section 921.0016(l)(c), Florida Statutes

Category: Criminal Procedure

Alling v. State

671 So. 2d 295, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3715, 1996 WL 169245

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1996 | Docket: 64763731

Published

See § 921.006(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(18). See also Capers v. State, 670 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dominguez v. State

669 So. 2d 1171, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3312, 1996 WL 148744

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1996 | Docket: 64763239

Published

001(4)(b), 921.001(5), 921.0014(2) Fla.Stat. (1995); Rule 3.702(b), Fla. R.Crim.P.; see also Gardner v. State

Category: Criminal Procedure

Roberts v. State

677 So. 2d 309, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2238, 1996 WL 100837

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1996 | Docket: 64766302

Published

superseded by the operation of this rule[,]” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(b), existing caselaw3 construes language

Category: Criminal Procedure

Garcia v. State

666 So. 2d 231, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13488, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 111

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1995 | Docket: 64761321

Published

641 So.2d 934 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). See also Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(19).1 Since the sentence exceeds the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

663 So. 2d 680, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12445, 1995 WL 703524

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1995 | Docket: 64760327

Published

40 to over 40 as in the instant case. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(16). Accordingly, we reverse and remand

Category: Criminal Procedure

Collier v. State

662 So. 2d 1035, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12299, 1995 WL 691960

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1995 | Docket: 64760148

Published

parameters for applying the multiplier. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(16). The state concedes this error. Accordingly

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Gillispie

665 So. 2d 262, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11736, 1995 WL 664581

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1995 | Docket: 64761028

Published

single guidelines scoresheet prepared pursuant to Rule 3.702, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, the rule

Category: Criminal Procedure

Crenshaw v. State

661 So. 2d 400, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10646, 1995 WL 601303

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 1995 | Docket: 64759245

Published

was not as comprehensive as is contemplated by Rule 3.702(d)(1), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure. As

Category: Criminal Procedure

Powell v. State

660 So. 2d 383, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9711, 1995 WL 544145

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 1995 | Docket: 64758663

Published

Guidelines, 628 So.2d 1084, 1094 (Fla.1993); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702 (1994). The trial court also erred when it

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cohen v. State

656 So. 2d 525, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5726, 1995 WL 316349

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1995 | Docket: 64757224

Published

found in section 921.0016, Florida Statutes, and Rule 3.702, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, apply to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mouissa v. State

652 So. 2d 1282, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3690, 1995 WL 215010

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1995 | Docket: 64755356

Published

affirmed. See § 921.0014(1), Fla.Stat. (1993); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(16). However, Appellant and the state

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Nov 17, 1994 | Docket: 3256652

Published

921.0011(2), Fla. Stat. (1993). And see, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(2). 11 Section 921.0011(5), Fla. Stat. (1993)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dautel v. State

647 So. 2d 236, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11104, 1994 WL 637296

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1994 | Docket: 64752915

Published

shall review the scoresheet for accuracy.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(1) (1994). Neither rule imposes on the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Prince v. State

641 So. 2d 496, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8367, 1994 WL 454877

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1994 | Docket: 64750412

Published

guidelines clarifies the issue by providing in rule 3.702(d)(8) (1994) that "[p]rior record shall include

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure re Sentencing Guidelines

628 So. 2d 1084, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 617, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1928, 1993 WL 490876

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 1993 | Docket: 64744908

Published

that date. We have, therefore, amended proposed rule 3.702 to delete any references to defendants’ electing

Category: Criminal Procedure