Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.702
RULE 3.702. SENTENCING GUIDELINES (1994)
(a) Use. This rule is to be used in conjunction with the forms
located at rule
3.990. This rule is intended to implement the 1994
revised sentencing guidelines in strict accordance with chapter 921,
Florida Statutes, as revised by chapter 93-406, Laws of Florida.
(b) Purpose and Construction. The purpose of the 1994
revised sentencing guidelines and the principles they embody are
set out in subsection 921.001(4). Existing caselaw construing the
application of sentencing guidelines that is in conflict with the
provisions of this rule or the statement of purpose or the principles
embodied by the 1994 sentencing guidelines set out in subsection
921.001(4) is superseded by the operation of this rule.
(c) Offense Severity Ranking. Felony offenses subject to
the 1994 revised sentencing guidelines are listed in a single offense
severity ranking chart located at section 921.0012. The offense
severity ranking chart employs 10 offense levels, ranked from least
severe to most severe. Each felony offense is assigned to a level
according to the severity of the offense, commensurate with the
harm or potential for harm to the community that is caused by the
offense. Felony offenses not listed in section 921.0012 are to be
assigned a severity level as described in section 921.0013.
(d) General Rules and Definitions.
(1) A comprehensive guidelines scoresheet shall be
prepared for each defendant covering all offenses pending before the
court for sentencing, including offenses for which the defendant has
been adjudicated an habitual felony offender or an habitual violent
felony offender. The office of the state attorney or the probation
services office, or both where appropriate, will prepare the
scoresheets and present them to defense counsel for review as to
accuracy. Where the defendant is alleged to have violated probation
or community control and probation services will recommend
revocation, probation services shall prepare a comprehensive
guidelines scoresheet for use at sentencing after revocation of
probation or community control. The sentencing judge shall review
the scoresheet for accuracy.
(2) “Conviction” means a determination of guilt
resulting from plea or trial, regardless of whether adjudication was
withheld or whether imposition of sentence was suspended.
(3) “Primary offense” is the offense pending for
sentencing that results in the highest number of total sentence
points. Only one offense may be scored as the primary offense.
(4) “Additional offense” is any offense, other than the
primary offense, pending before the court for sentencing. Sentence
points for additional offenses are determined by the severity level
and the number of offenses at a particular severity level.
Misdemeanors are scored at level “M” regardless of degree.
(5) “Victim injury” is scored for physical injury or death
suffered by a person as a direct result of any offense pending before
the court for sentencing. If an offense pending before the court for
sentencing involves sexual penetration, victim injury is to be
scored. If an offense pending before the court for sentencing
involves sexual contact, but no penetration, victim injury shall be
scored. If the victim of an offense involving sexual penetration or
sexual contact without penetration suffers any physical injury as a
direct result of an offense pending before the court for sentencing,
that physical injury is to be scored separately and in addition to
any points scored for the sexual contact or sexual penetration.
Victim injury shall be scored for each victim physically injured
and for each offense resulting in physical injury whether there are
one or more victims. However, if the victim injury is the result of a
crime of which the defendant has been acquitted, it shall not be
scored.
(6) Attempts, conspiracies, and solicitations charged
under chapter 777 are scored at severity levels below the level at
which the completed offense is located. Attempts and solicitations
are scored 2 severity levels below the completed offense. Criminal
conspiracies are scored 1 severity level below the completed offense.
(7) “Total offense score” results from adding the
sentence points for primary offense, additional offense, and victim
injury.
(8) “Prior record” refers to any conviction for an offense
committed by the defendant prior to the commission of the primary
offense. Prior record shall include convictions for offenses
committed by the defendant as an adult or as a juvenile,
convictions by federal, out-of-state, military, or foreign courts, and
convictions for violations of county or municipal ordinances that
incorporate by reference a penalty under state law. Federal, out-of-
state, military, or foreign convictions are scored at the severity level
at which the analogous or parallel Florida crime is located.
(A) Convictions for offenses committed more than
10 years prior to the date of the commission of the primary offense
are not scored as prior record if the defendant has not been
convicted of any other crime for a period of 10 consecutive years
from the most recent date of release from confinement, supervision,
or other sanction, which-ever is later, to the date of the commission
of the primary offense.
(B) Juvenile dispositions of offenses committed by
the defendant within 3 years prior to the date of the commission of
the primary offense are scored as prior record if the offense would
have been a crime if committed by an adult. Juvenile dispositions of
sexual offenses committed by the defendant more than 3 years prior
to the date of the primary offense are to be scored as prior record if
the defendant has not maintained a conviction-free record, either as
an adult or as a juvenile, for a period of 3 consecutive years from
the most recent date of release from confinement, supervision, or
sanction, whichever is later, to the date of commission of the
primary offense.
(C) Entries in criminal histories that show no
disposition, disposition unknown, arrest only, or a disposition other
than conviction shall not be scored. Criminal history records
expunged or sealed under section 943.058 or other provisions of
law, including former sections 893.14 and 901.33, shall be scored
as prior record where the defendant whose record has been
expunged or sealed is before the court for sentencing.
(D) Any uncertainty in the scoring of the
defendant’s prior record shall be resolved in favor of the defendant,
and disagreement as to the propriety of scoring specific entries in
the prior record shall be resolved by the sentencing judge.
(E) When unable to determine whether the
conviction to be scored as prior record is a felony or a
misdemeanor, the conviction should be scored as a misdemeanor.
When the degree of felony is ambiguous or the severity level cannot
be deter-mined, the conviction should be scored at severity level 1.
(9) “Legal status violations” occur when a defendant,
while under any of the forms of legal status listed in subsection
921.0011(3), commits an offense that results in conviction. Legal
status violations receive a score of 4 sentence points and are scored
when the offense committed while under legal status is before the
court for sentencing. Points for a legal status violation are to be
assessed only once regardless of the existence of more than one
form of legal status at the time an offense is committed or the
number of offenses committed while under any form of legal status.
(10) “Release program violations” occur when the
defendant is found to have violated a condition of a release program
designated in subsection 921.0011(6). Six points shall be assessed
for each violation up to a maximum of 18 points in the case of
multiple violations. Where there are multiple violations, points in
excess of 6 may be assessed only for each successive violation that
follows the reinstatement or modification of the release program
and are not to be assessed for violation of several conditions of a
single release program order.
(11) “Total prior record score” results from adding
sentence points for prior record, legal status violations, and release
program violations.
(12) Possession of a firearm, destructive device,
semiautomatic weapon, or a machine gun during the commission or
attempt to commit a crime will result in additional sentence points.
Eighteen sentence points shall be assessed where the defendant is
convicted of committing or attempting to commit any felony other
than those enumerated in subsection
775.087(2) while having in his
or her possession a firearm as defined in subsection
790.001(6) or a
destructive device as defined in subsection
790.001(4). Twenty-five
sentence points shall be assessed where the offender is convicted of
committing or attempting to commit any felony other than those
enumerated in subsection
775.087(2) while having in his or her
possession a semiautomatic weapon as defined in subsection
775.087(2) or a machine gun as defined in subsection
790.001(9).
(13) “Subtotal sentence points” result from adding the
total offense score, the total prior record score, and any additional
points for possession of a firearm, destructive device,
semiautomatic weapon, or machine gun.
(14) If the primary offense is drug trafficking under
section
893.135, the subtotal sentence points may be multiplied, at
the discretion of the sentencing court, by a factor of 1.5. If the
primary offense is a violation of the Law Enforcement Protection Act
under subsections
775.0823(2), (3), (4), or (5), the subtotal sentence
points shall be multiplied by a factor of 2. If the primary offense is a
violation of subsection
775.087(2)(a)(2) or subsections
775.0823(6)
or (7), the subtotal sentence points shall be multiplied by a factor of
1.5. If both enhancements are applicable, only the enhancement
with the higher multiplier is to be used.
(15) “Total sentence points” result from the
enhancement, if applicable, of the subtotal sentence points. If no
enhancement is applicable, the subtotal sentence points are the
total sentence points.
(16) “Presumptive sentence” is determined by the total
sentence points. If the total sentence points are less than or equal
to 40, the recommended sentence, absent a departure, shall not be
state prison. However, the sentencing court may increase sentence
points less than or equal to 40 by up to and including 15 percent to
arrive at total sentence points in excess of 40. If the total sentence
points are greater than 40 but less than or equal to 52, the decision
to sentence the defendant to state prison or a nonstate prison
sanction is left to the discretion of the sentencing court. If the total
sentence points are greater than 52, the sentence, absent a
departure, must be to state prison.
A state prison sentence is calculated by deducting 28 points
from the total sentence points where total sentence points exceed
40. The resulting number represents state prison months. State
prison months may be increased or decreased by up to and
including 25 percent at the discretion of the sentencing court. State
prison months may not be increased where the sentencing court
has exercised discretion to increase total sentence points under 40
points to achieve a state prison sentence. The sentence imposed
must be entered on the score-sheet.
(17) For those offenses having a mandatory penalty, a
scoresheet should be completed and the guidelines presumptive
sentence calculated. If the presumptive sentence is less than the
mandatory penalty, the mandatory sentence takes precedence. If
the presumptive sentence exceeds the mandatory sentence, the
presumptive sentence should be imposed.
(18) Departure from the recommended guidelines
sentence provided by the total sentence points should be avoided
unless there are circumstances or factors that reasonably justify
aggravating or mitigating the sentence. A state prison sentence that
deviates from the recommended prison sentence by more than 25
percent, a state prison sentence where the total sentence points are
equal to or less than 40, or a sentence other than state prison
where the total sentence points are greater than 52 must be
accompanied by a written statement delineating the reasons for
departure. Circumstances or factors that can be considered include,
but are not limited to, those listed in subsections 921.0016(3) and
(4). Reasons for departing from the recommended guidelines
sentence shall not include circumstances or factors relating to prior
arrests without conviction or charged offenses for which convictions
have not been obtained.
(A) If a sentencing judge imposes a sentence that
departs from the recommended guidelines sentence, the reasons for
departure shall be orally articulated at the time sentence is
imposed. Any departure sentence must be accompanied by a
written statement, signed by the sentencing judge, delineating the
reasons for departure. The written statement shall be filed in the
court file within 15 days of the date of sentencing. A written
transcription of orally stated reasons for departure articulated at
the time sentence was imposed is sufficient if it is signed by the
sentencing judge and filed in the court file within 15 days of the
date of sentencing. The sentencing judge may also list the written
reasons for departure in the space provided on the guidelines
scoresheet and shall sign the scoresheet.
(B) The written statement delineating the reasons
for departure shall be made a part of the record. The written
statement, if it is a separate document, must accompany the
guidelines scoresheet required to be provided to the Department of
Corrections pursuant to subsection 921.0014(5).
(19) The sentencing court shall impose or suspend
sentence for each separate count, as convicted. The total sentence
shall be within the guidelines sentence unless a departure is
ordered.
If a split sentence is imposed, the incarcerative portion of the
sentence must not deviate more than 25 percent from the
recommended guidelines prison sentence. The total sanction
(incarceration and community control or probation) shall not exceed
the term provided by general law or the guidelines recommended
sentence where the provisions of subsection 921.001(5) apply.
(20) Sentences imposed after revocation of probation or
community control must be in accordance with the guidelines.
Cumulative incarceration imposed after revocation of probation or
community control is subject to limitations imposed by the
guidelines. A violation of probation or community control may not
be the basis for a departure sentence.
Committee Notes
1993 Adoption. (d)(1) If sentences are imposed under
section
775.084 and the sentencing guidelines, a scoresheet listing
only those offenses sentenced under the sentencing guidelines must
be prepared and utilized in lieu of the comprehensive scoresheet.
Due to ethical considerations, defense counsel may not be
compelled to submit or sign a scoresheet.
(d)(3) The primary offense need not be the highest ranked
offense pending for sentencing where scoring the less severe offense
as the primary offense will result in higher total sentence points.
This can occur where the multipliers for drug trafficking or
violations of the Law Enforcement Protection Act are applied or
where past convictions can be included as prior record that could
not be scored if the offense ranked at a higher severity level was the
primary offense.
(d)(16) The presumptive sentence is assumed to be
appropriate for the composite score of the defendant. Where the
total sentence points do not exceed 40, the court has the flexibility
to impose any lawful term of probation with or without a period of
incarceration as a condition of probation, a county jail term alone,
or any nonincarcerative disposition. Any sentence may include a
requirement that a fine be paid.
Cases Citing Rule 3.702
Total Results: 157
759 So. 2d 620, 2000 WL 178052
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2000 | Docket: 1421324
Cited 311 times | Published
001(4)(b)2., Fla. Stat. (1995); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702; Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.991. Under the 1995 guidelines
Category: Criminal Procedure
760 So. 2d 89
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2000 | Docket: 1324543
Cited 171 times | Published
during the sentencing hearing as required by rule 3.702(d)(18)(A), but filed written reasons for departure
Category: Criminal Procedure
802 So. 2d 281, 2001 WL 776269
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2001 | Docket: 1699005
Cited 71 times | Published
result of this legislation, this Court adopted rule 3.702(d)(5), which provided
"Victim injury" is scored
Category: Criminal Procedure
714 So. 2d 440, 1998 WL 309060
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1998 | Docket: 1513771
Cited 32 times | Published
sentencing worksheet score under the provisions of rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
678 So. 2d 330, 1996 WL 399857
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1996 | Docket: 1470847
Cited 29 times | Published
superseded." *333 628 So.2d at 1084; see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(b).
Capers also argues that the double counting
Category: Criminal Procedure
658 So. 2d 88, 1995 WL 424183
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1995 | Docket: 1525053
Cited 27 times | Published
prepared by the state attorney's *91 office); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(1) (1994) (sentencing judge shall review
Category: Criminal Procedure
128 So. 3d 832, 2013 WL 6083405, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18426
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 2013 | Docket: 60237174
Cited 24 times | Published
pending before the court for sentencing.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.702(d)(5). “At the sentencing proceeding the
Category: Criminal Procedure
661 So. 2d 1274, 1995 WL 627460
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1995 | Docket: 1526402
Cited 16 times | Published
sentenced under the 1994 sentencing guidelines.[5] Rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
692 So. 2d 199, 1997 WL 30812
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1997 | Docket: 436342
Cited 14 times | Published
victim injury has been properly scored under Rule 3.702 and subsections 921.0011(7) and 921.0014(1),
Category: Criminal Procedure
729 So. 2d 956, 1999 WL 22429
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1999 | Docket: 2275662
Cited 12 times | Published
Appellant argues that the trial court's reliance upon rule 3.702(d)(2) as the basis for denying his challenge
Category: Criminal Procedure
680 So. 2d 616, 1996 WL 577393
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1996 | Docket: 1201485
Cited 12 times | Published
principles of double jeopardy. But we construe rule 3.702(d)(12) as inapplicable to convictions of these
Category: Criminal Procedure
662 So. 2d 1248, 1995 WL 353512
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1995 | Docket: 1683519
Cited 12 times | Published
sentencing. § 921.0016(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(18)(A); see § 921.001(4)(b)(2), Fla. Stat
Category: Criminal Procedure
783 So. 2d 1171, 2001 WL 394878
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2001 | Docket: 1259643
Cited 11 times | Published
2d [1084] at 1084 [(Fla.1993)]; see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(b) (emphasis added).
Id. It is clear from
Category: Criminal Procedure
660 So. 2d 701, 1995 WL 555308
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 1995 | Docket: 1755760
Cited 11 times | Published
justice.
However, since section 921.0016(1)(c) and rule 3.702(d)(18) now allow fifteen days in which to file
Category: Criminal Procedure
717 So. 2d 1057, 1998 WL 476269
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1998 | Docket: 1681408
Cited 9 times | Published
articulate departure reasons at sentencing under Rule 3.702(d)(18)(A), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
683 So. 2d 1093, 1996 WL 668423
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1996 | Docket: 1514982
Cited 9 times | Published
assault on law enforcement officer); cf. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(14) (1995) (which does not provide enhancement
Category: Criminal Procedure
666 So. 2d 941, 1995 WL 757916
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1995 | Docket: 452524
Cited 9 times | Published
points to the guidelines scoresheet pursuant to rule 3.702(d)(12) which states:
Possession of a firearm
Category: Criminal Procedure
865 So. 2d 640, 2004 WL 256978
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2004 | Docket: 1231690
Cited 8 times | Published
777.04(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1993); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(6). Anderson's correct primary offense
Category: Criminal Procedure
775 So. 2d 994, 2000 WL 1817038
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 2000 | Docket: 1668002
Cited 8 times | Published
(1997); or within fifteen days as required by rule 3.702(d)(18)(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
833 So. 2d 169, 2002 WL 31528583
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2002 | Docket: 1259185
Cited 7 times | Published
in Hudson occurred within the Heggs "window," rule 3.702(d)(5) controlled"Victim injury shall be scored
Category: Criminal Procedure
799 So. 2d 1126, 2001 WL 1432945
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2001 | Docket: 487002
Cited 7 times | Published
successfully completed probation. We agree and reverse.
Rule 3.702(d)(2), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides:
Category: Criminal Procedure
696 So. 2d 893, 1997 WL 348762
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1997 | Docket: 1696249
Cited 7 times | Published
specifically as applicable to the present case Rule 3.702 (1994). There the term, `recommended sentence'
Category: Criminal Procedure
681 So. 2d 901, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11110, 1996 WL 603787
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1996 | Docket: 1722208
Cited 7 times | Published
law." § 921.0011(5), Fla. Stat. (1995); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(8), 3.703(d)(15). It follows that if
Category: Criminal Procedure
702 So. 2d 633, 1997 WL 783051
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1997 | Docket: 460214
Cited 6 times | Published
nonincarcerative disposition. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702 (1993 committee note to rule 3.702(d)(16)). As a result,
Category: Criminal Procedure
691 So. 2d 502, 1997 WL 97157
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1997 | Docket: 1423831
Cited 6 times | Published
represents, after deducting 28 points pursuant to Rule 3.702(d)(16), a recommended state prison term of 65
Category: Criminal Procedure
683 So. 2d 577, 1996 WL 648296
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1996 | Docket: 276474
Cited 6 times | Published
(Fla. 5th DCA 1995), we held that the meaning of rule 3.702(d)(12) was clear and any felony not enumerated
Category: Criminal Procedure
658 So. 2d 1226, 1995 WL 481036
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 1995 | Docket: 439323
Cited 6 times | Published
primary offense. Additionally, in violation of rule 3.702(d)(5) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
854 So. 2d 215, 2003 WL 21683482
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 2003 | Docket: 1294250
Cited 5 times | Published
points from Appellee's scoresheet because Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(5), in effect when Appellee committed
Category: Criminal Procedure
697 So. 2d 997, 1997 WL 446924
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1997 | Docket: 1776641
Cited 5 times | Published
0011(3), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(9). Release program violations occurred
Category: Criminal Procedure
696 So. 2d 916, 1997 WL 364513
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1997 | Docket: 1696294
Cited 5 times | Published
limit the prison term to be imposed. However, Rule 3.702(d)(19), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
659 So. 2d 1352, 1995 WL 525670
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1995 | Docket: 1462584
Cited 5 times | Published
(1993).
[2] § 39.061, Fla. Stat. (1993).
[3] Rule 3.702 was adopted "to implement the 1994 revised sentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
869 So. 2d 45, 2004 WL 399217
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2004 | Docket: 1653982
Cited 4 times | Published
wording in section 927.001(7)(a) (quoted above) and rule 3.702(d)(5) (discussed above), which both require that
Category: Criminal Procedure
801 So. 2d 1041, 2001 WL 1635500
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2001 | Docket: 1744734
Cited 4 times | Published
forth in rule 3.702(14) of the 1994 version of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure:
Rule 3.702. Sentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
787 So. 2d 94, 2001 WL 293148
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2001 | Docket: 1496247
Cited 4 times | Published
the inclusion of a discretionary multiplier. Rule 3.702(14) provides that the multiplier may be applied
Category: Criminal Procedure
764 So. 2d 930, 2000 WL 1189556
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2000 | Docket: 1516427
Cited 4 times | Published
penetration, victim injury shall be scored." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(5). Sexual contact is not specifically
Category: Criminal Procedure
774 So. 2d 1, 2000 WL 627653
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 2000 | Docket: 1330694
Cited 4 times | Published
By that time, the sentencing guidelines and rule 3.702 had been amended. Rule 3.703(d)(22) and section
Category: Criminal Procedure
715 So. 2d 258, 1998 WL 394130
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1998 | Docket: 1716928
Cited 4 times | Published
the commission of the possession offense. Under rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
825 So. 2d 927, 2002 WL 1207707
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2002 | Docket: 1691155
Cited 3 times | Published
001(6), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1994); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(18) (1994); § 921.0016(3), (4), Fla.
Category: Criminal Procedure
719 So. 2d 348, 1998 WL 673164
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1998 | Docket: 2532935
Cited 3 times | Published
assessment of eighteen points as an enhancement under Rule 3.702(d)(12). Nonetheless, Mathis is not entitled to
Category: Criminal Procedure
700 So. 2d 765, 1997 WL 631141
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1997 | Docket: 1719640
Cited 3 times | Published
Criminal Procedure, is applicable.
However, Rule 3.702(d)(18)(A), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
693 So. 2d 135, 1997 WL 249136
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1997 | Docket: 1524376
Cited 3 times | Published
principles of double jeopardy. But we construe *137 rule 3.702(d)(12) as inapplicable to convictions of these
Category: Criminal Procedure
679 So. 2d 871, 1996 WL 526176
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1996 | Docket: 2577384
Cited 3 times | Published
using a law enforcement multiplier is found in rule 3.702(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (1995)
Category: Criminal Procedure
681 So. 2d 767, 1996 WL 514599
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1996 | Docket: 1385492
Cited 3 times | Published
of a firearm or destructive device. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(14). This error requires correction and
Category: Criminal Procedure
670 So. 2d 967, 1995 WL 746370
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1995 | Docket: 1245654
Cited 3 times | Published
Guidelines, 628 So.2d 1084, 1089 (Fla.1993); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(b).[7] We therefore conclude that the victim's
Category: Criminal Procedure
664 So. 2d 55, 1995 WL 722906
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1995 | Docket: 1656078
Cited 3 times | Published
directives of the most recent guidelines rule: Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(18). That rule became effective January 1
Category: Criminal Procedure
859 So. 2d 613, 2003 WL 22799303
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 2003 | Docket: 1284567
Cited 2 times | Published
sentence unless a written reason is given"); Fla. R. Crim P. 3.702(d)(19) & 3.703(d)(31) ("The sentencing court
Category: Criminal Procedure
837 So. 2d 535, 2003 WL 288963
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2003 | Docket: 1527515
Cited 2 times | Published
crime of which the defendant is acquitted. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(5). In this case, Key was acquitted of
Category: Criminal Procedure
784 So. 2d 524, 2001 WL 417331
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2001 | Docket: 1744102
Cited 2 times | Published
completed crime. Thus, section 777.04(4)(a) and rule 3.702(d)(6) require that attempted second degree murder
Category: Criminal Procedure
742 So. 2d 350, 1999 WL 606475
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1999 | Docket: 1302924
Cited 2 times | Published
Sentencing Guidelines, 628 So.2d 1084 (Fla.1993). Rule 3.702(d)(5) provided for scoring of victim injury for
Category: Criminal Procedure
737 So. 2d 1145, 1999 WL 410316
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1999 | Docket: 1709587
Cited 2 times | Published
whether there are one or more victims." Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.702(d)(5) (emphasis added). "`Victim injury'
Category: Criminal Procedure
727 So. 2d 257, 1999 WL 68450
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1999 | Docket: 1438427
Cited 2 times | Published
by a convicted felon. We reasoned that neither rule 3.702(d)(12)[1] of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
720 So. 2d 1134, 1998 WL 769782
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1998 | Docket: 1371808
Cited 2 times | Published
analogy cannot be drawn.
[5] Although Rager cites rule 3.702, rule 3.703 applies because his offenses were
Category: Criminal Procedure
714 So. 2d 643, 1998 WL 422781
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1998 | Docket: 1513805
Cited 2 times | Published
convicted felon.[2] The Court determined that rule 3.702(d)(12) and section 921.0014, Florida Statutes
Category: Criminal Procedure
674 So. 2d 802, 1996 WL 229049
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1996 | Docket: 1148553
Cited 2 times | Published
the guidelines recommended sentence...." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(19) *803 (1996); see Gonzalez v. State
Category: Criminal Procedure
661 So. 2d 411, 1995 WL 608506
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1995 | Docket: 1526435
Cited 2 times | Published
2d 1084, 1089 (Fla. 1993). In accordance with rule 3.702, "[f]elony offenses not listed in section 921
Category: Criminal Procedure
658 So. 2d 1249, 1995 WL 497299
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1995 | Docket: 1885036
Cited 2 times | Published
his criminal history may be scored. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(8)(E).
This scoresheet is not saved merely
Category: Criminal Procedure
135 So. 3d 440, 2014 WL 982667, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3596
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2014 | Docket: 60239638
Cited 1 times | Published
level below the completed offense. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.702(d)(6).
. We note that the Second District
Category: Criminal Procedure
786 So. 2d 12, 2001 WL 328562
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2001 | Docket: 1681964
Cited 1 times | Published
sentencing can be scored on the scoresheet under rule 3.702(d)(5). To answer this question, it will be helpful
Category: Criminal Procedure
760 So. 2d 89, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 367, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 906
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2000 | Docket: 64797897
Cited 1 times | Published
during the sentencing hearing as required by rule 3.702(d)(18)(A), but filed written reasons for departure
Category: Criminal Procedure
742 So. 2d 422, 1999 WL 770680
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1999 | Docket: 2590363
Cited 1 times | Published
So.2d 916 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(19); § 921.001(5), Fla. Stat. (1997)
Category: Criminal Procedure
724 So. 2d 652, 1999 WL 12696
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1999 | Docket: 1733958
Cited 1 times | Published
he was being sentenced in this case. Although rule 3.702(d)(12) provides 18 points are to be assessed
Category: Criminal Procedure
721 So. 2d 818, 1998 WL 876973
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1998 | Docket: 1694466
Cited 1 times | Published
State, 664 So.2d 55, 56 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (Rule 3.702(d)(18) "require(s) some form of writing, and
Category: Criminal Procedure
723 So. 2d 873, 1998 WL 845889
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1998 | Docket: 1311986
Cited 1 times | Published
additional points for firearm possession. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(12). Mohn reserved his right to appeal
Category: Criminal Procedure
687 So. 2d 312, 1997 WL 26645
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1997 | Docket: 1290510
Cited 1 times | Published
087(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1995). See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(12); Palmer v. State, 667 So.2d 1018
Category: Criminal Procedure
675 So. 2d 1008, 1996 WL 329596
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1996 | Docket: 2540820
Cited 1 times | Published
to offenses committed before 1994. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(a); § 921.001(4)(b)2, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994)
Category: Criminal Procedure
199 So. 3d 941, 2016 WL 3065576, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8352
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2016 | Docket: 3071354
Published
guidelines, both orally and in writing. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(18) (1994). This court reviewed such
Category: Criminal Procedure
198 So. 3d 792, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3601, 2016 WL 886225
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2016 | Docket: 3044949
Published
4
.
'See, e.g,,
Fla. R.Crim. P'.'3.702(d)(18).(requiring a trial court, .in imposing
Category: Criminal Procedure
181 So. 3d 1250, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19349, 2015 WL 9437999
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 2015 | Docket: 60252541
Published
offenses.. See § 921.002, Fla. Stat. (2013); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(20) (“Sentences imposed after revocation
Category: Criminal Procedure
198 So. 3d 675, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19155, 2015 WL 9311400
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2015 | Docket: 3023597
Published
sentence with written findings.” § 921.001(5); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.702(d)(18)(A);
see also Jenigen v. State
Category: Criminal Procedure
161 So. 3d 1282
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 2015 | Docket: 2647163
Published
3.704(d)(27)(A) contains similar language to rule 3.702(d)(18)(A), it applies only to
downward
Category: Criminal Procedure
19 So. 3d 451, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16072, 2009 WL 3446756
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2009 | Docket: 60254644
Published
the “Release Program Violation” line. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(1). The court shall forward the corrected
Category: Criminal Procedure
12 So. 3d 907, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9331, 2009 WL 1940815
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 2009 | Docket: 1646631
Published
04(2), 921.0012(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (1995); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(c) & (d)(6), 3.990; see also Hoag v. State
Category: Criminal Procedure
9 So. 3d 705, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3245, 2009 WL 1025413
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2009 | Docket: 2548566
Published
before the court for sentencing." Furthermore, rule 3.702(d)(4) defines an "additional offense" as "any
Category: Criminal Procedure
967 So. 2d 397, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16468, 2007 WL 3033514
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2007 | Docket: 64852801
Published
must be within the guidelines range. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(19) (“The sentencing court shall impose
Category: Criminal Procedure
959 So. 2d 413, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9528, 2007 WL 1754660
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2007 | Docket: 64851279
Published
Affirmed. See § 775.087(2), Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(12); Grantham v. State, 735 So.2d 525
Category: Criminal Procedure
917 So. 2d 962, 2005 WL 3487806
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2005 | Docket: 1509645
Published
probation. § 921.001(5), Fla. Stat. (1995); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(19); Mays v. State, 717 So.2d 515, 516
Category: Criminal Procedure
886 So. 2d 251, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15407, 2004 WL 2347562
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2004 | Docket: 64834052
Published
injury points could properly be assessed. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(5). See Brown v. State, 700 So.2d 447
Category: Criminal Procedure
876 So. 2d 1256, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9928, 2004 WL 1496649
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2004 | Docket: 64831656
Published
*1259Unlike rule 3.701 discussed in Peters, rule 3.702(d)(3) states that a “ ‘[p]rimary offense’ is
Category: Criminal Procedure
873 So. 2d 605, 2004 WL 1175280
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2004 | Docket: 1732960
Published
discretionary with the sentencing court. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(14). See also Perez v. State, 804 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
873 So. 2d 547, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7070, 2004 WL 1123779
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2004 | Docket: 64830698
Published
So.2d 443 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(19).
Category: Criminal Procedure
852 So. 2d 364, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12209, 2003 WL 21946399
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2003 | Docket: 64824386
Published
sentence does not comply with Fla. R.Crim. P. Rule 3.702(d)(19), when read in conjunction with § 921.001(5)
Category: Criminal Procedure
847 So. 2d 614, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9235, 2003 WL 21414661
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2003 | Docket: 64823381
Published
an additional 18 sentence points are assessed;
Rule 3.702(12) states in pertinent part:
Eighteen sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
842 So. 2d 858, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 75, 2003 WL 43369
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2003 | Docket: 64822155
Published
guidelines without reason for a departure. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(19). In this case, the consecutive sentences
Category: Criminal Procedure
824 So. 2d 264, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12561, 2002 WL 31040367
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2002 | Docket: 64817062
Published
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d); Huff v. State, 639 So.2d 208 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994);
Category: Criminal Procedure
821 So. 2d 379, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9673, 2002 WL 1466232
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2002 | Docket: 64816414
Published
section 921.0016(l)(c), Fla. Stat. (1993) and Rule 3.702(d)(18), Fla. R.Crim. P., his departure sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
804 So. 2d 1265, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 556, 2002 WL 90829
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2002 | Docket: 64811727
Published
0014(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1997). See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3 .702(d)(14) (providing that application of the
Category: Criminal Procedure
802 So. 2d 470, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18025, 2001 WL 1635561
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2001 | Docket: 64811028
Published
record and not as additional offenses. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(4), (8).
We have considered the other
Category: Criminal Procedure
790 So. 2d 1198, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10924, 2001 WL 871538
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 2001 | Docket: 64807265
Published
score-sheet. See § 921.0014, Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(10). Under the 1994 guidelines, Kiste
Category: Criminal Procedure
780 So. 2d 293, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3404, 2001 WL 256029
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2001 | Docket: 64804348
Published
attached a 1994 guidelines seoresheet. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702 and 3.990. However, there appears to be
Category: Criminal Procedure
774 So. 2d 957, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 277, 2001 WL 37815
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2001 | Docket: 64802798
Published
DCA 1996); § 921.004, Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(12).
Affirmed in part; reversed in part
Category: Criminal Procedure
765 So. 2d 216, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9047, 2000 WL 990972
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2000 | Docket: 64799701
Published
prepared for each offense. In accordance with Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(10), “release program violation” points
Category: Criminal Procedure
739 So. 2d 1261, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11123, 1999 WL 629899
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1999 | Docket: 64790514
Published
White court, in dealing with subsection (12) of Rule 3.702(d), held:
[W]here the possession of a firearm
Category: Criminal Procedure
740 So. 2d 1210, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10602, 1999 WL 586979
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1999 | Docket: 64790831
Published
sentence points are assessed. See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(12) (eighteen additional sentence points
Category: Criminal Procedure
734 So. 2d 1152, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7212, 1999 WL 346129
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1999 | Docket: 64788737
Published
was grand theft of a firearm. See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(12). Whit-taker did not commit any other
Category: Criminal Procedure
731 So. 2d 784, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4895, 1999 WL 218189
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1999 | Docket: 64787995
Published
propriety of assessing 25 points pursuant *785to rule 3.702(12) because of White. In this case, the assessment
Category: Criminal Procedure
724 So. 2d 194, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 644, 1999 WL 30357
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1999 | Docket: 64785489
Published
v. State, 293 So.2d 44, 45 (Fla.1974); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(18)(A); § 921.001(6), Fla. Stat. (1995)
Category: Criminal Procedure
722 So. 2d 271, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15963, 1998 WL 879570
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1998 | Docket: 64784921
Published
. § 790.01(2), Fla. Slat. (1997).
. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(12).
Category: Criminal Procedure
721 So. 2d 717, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 571, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 2110, 1998 WL 750907
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1998 | Docket: 64784624
Published
firearm by a convicted felon. We reasoned that rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
719 So. 2d 351, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12722, 1998 WL 698273
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1998 | Docket: 64783582
Published
not be added to a defendant’s score pursuant to rule 3.702(d) for possession of a firearm if the only crime
Category: Criminal Procedure
717 So. 2d 627, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12281, 1998 WL 653605
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1998 | Docket: 64782828
Published
deviation permitted under the guidelines. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(18). Nevertheless, we reverse and remand
Category: Criminal Procedure
717 So. 2d 192, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11825, 1998 WL 637154
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1998 | Docket: 64782699
Published
Hill, 698 So.2d 647 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(18)(A).
COBB, GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ
Category: Criminal Procedure
718 So. 2d 266, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11316, 1998 WL 558987
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1998 | Docket: 64783174
Published
State, 664 So.2d 55 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(18).
. Domberg v. State, 661 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
717 So. 2d 587, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11283, 1998 WL 560135
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1998 | Docket: 64782799
Published
23 Fla. L. Weekly S311 (Fla. June 12, 1998). Rule 3.702(d)(12) Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
718 So. 2d 751, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 421, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1483, 1998 WL 608230
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1998 | Docket: 64783373
Published
placed particular importance on the language of rule 3.702(d)(12) that expressly provided assessment of
Category: Criminal Procedure
718 So. 2d 753, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 422, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1476, 1998 WL 608236
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1998 | Docket: 64783374
Published
firearm by a convicted felon. In other words, rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
716 So. 2d 325, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10359, 1998 WL 472545
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1998 | Docket: 64782373
Published
committed on or after October 1, 1995. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(14); § 775.0823(2), Fla. Stat. (1995)
Category: Criminal Procedure
715 So. 2d 256, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 404, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1329, 1998 WL 394172
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1998 | Docket: 64782020
Published
convicted felon. In other words, we held that rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
717 So. 2d 522, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 402, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1317, 1998 WL 394009
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1998 | Docket: 64782781
Published
convicted felon. In other words, we held that rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
717 So. 2d 520, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 402, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1327, 1998 WL 394192
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1998 | Docket: 64782779
Published
firearm by a convicted felon. In other words, rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
717 So. 2d 521, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 402, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1331, 1998 WL 394170
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1998 | Docket: 64782780
Published
convicted felon. In other words, we held that rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
714 So. 2d 460, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 403, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1324, 1998 WL 394202
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1998 | Docket: 64781842
Published
firearm by a convicted felon. In other words, rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
717 So. 2d 519, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 403, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1325, 1998 WL 394182
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1998 | Docket: 64782778
Published
convicted felon. In other words, we held that rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
717 So. 2d 524, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 401, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1330, 1998 WL 394174
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1998 | Docket: 64782783
Published
convicted felon. In other words, we held that rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
715 So. 2d 257, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 403, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1321, 1998 WL 394158
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1998 | Docket: 64782021
Published
firearm by a convicted felon. In other words, rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
717 So. 2d 523, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 401, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1326, 1998 WL 394179
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1998 | Docket: 64782782
Published
firearm by a convicted felon. In other words, rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
713 So. 2d 987, 1998 WL 309077
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1998 | Docket: 2549329
Published
firearm by a convicted felon. In other words, rule 3.702(d)(12) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
710 So. 2d 775, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 6524, 1998 WL 288382
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1998 | Docket: 64780933
Published
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(12); Wilkins v. State, 693 So.2d 62 (Fla. 5th DCA)
Category: Criminal Procedure
711 So. 2d 27, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 181, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 604, 1998 WL 173098
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1998 | Docket: 64781037
Published
APPENDIX
FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Rule 3.702. Sentencing Guidelines (1994). [No changes to
Category: Criminal Procedure
779 So. 2d 276, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14083, 1997 WL 912913
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1997 | Docket: 64804069
Published
contain the trial court’s signature. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(18)(A).
Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing
Category: Criminal Procedure
702 So. 2d 1350, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14050, 1997 WL 770657
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1997 | Docket: 64777419
Published
case law prior to January 1, 1994, pursuant to rule 3.702(b), 3.703(b), Fla. R.Crim. P.1 We hold that the
Category: Criminal Procedure
703 So. 2d 1161, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13664, 1997 WL 777829
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1997 | Docket: 64777925
Published
the lien. See § 27.56, Fla. Stat. (1995); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(1); Bourque v. State, 595 So.2d 222 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
702 So. 2d 600, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13351, 1997 WL 740780
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1997 | Docket: 64777292
Published
to contest the amount of the lien. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(1); Bourque v. State, 595 So.2d 222 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
701 So. 2d 660, 1997 WL 721991
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1997 | Docket: 309849
Published
but the language remains unchanged from former Rule 3.702(d)(12).
Category: Criminal Procedure
700 So. 2d 779, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11851, 1997 WL 637646
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 1997 | Docket: 64776326
Published
sentencing guidelines and is essentially the same as rule 3.702(d)(12) of the 1994 sentencing guidelines, which
Category: Criminal Procedure
698 So. 2d 837, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 531, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1356, 1997 WL 545817
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1997 | Docket: 64775551
Published
section 921.0014(1), Florida Statutes (1993), and rule 3.702(d)(16), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Category: Criminal Procedure
697 So. 2d 1309, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9466, 1997 WL 473676
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1997 | Docket: 64775399
Published
921.0016(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1995), and rule 3.702(d)(18), Florida Rules Criminal Procedures. On
Category: Criminal Procedure
695 So. 2d 933, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7243, 1997 WL 356524
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1997 | Docket: 64774387
Published
to contest the amount of the lien. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(1); Bourque v. State, 595 So.2d 222 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
694 So. 2d 887, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6537, 1997 WL 318042
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1997 | Docket: 64774105
Published
years prior to the instant offense. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(B)(A). Furthermore, costs of prosecution
Category: Criminal Procedure
694 So. 2d 868, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6199, 1997 WL 306976
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1997 | Docket: 64774094
Published
sentence. See § 921.0014(1), Fla Stat. (1993); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(16) (“State prison months may not be increased
Category: Criminal Procedure
694 So. 2d 108, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5617, 1997 WL 270616
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 1997 | Docket: 64773869
Published
1993, and therefore section 921.0016(l)(e) and rule 3.702(d)(18), do not apply in this case. The statute
Category: Criminal Procedure
691 So. 2d 574, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3770, 1997 WL 169521
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1997 | Docket: 64772453
Published
his criminal history may be scored. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(8)(E).
This scoresheet is not saved merely
Category: Criminal Procedure
689 So. 2d 1196, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2126, 1997 WL 106968
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1997 | Docket: 64771809
Published
which are applicable to his offense.1
Second, rule 3.702(d)(14) provides for a multiplier where “the primary
Category: Criminal Procedure
687 So. 2d 831, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 74, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 21, 1997 WL 57235
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1997 | Docket: 64771047
Published
operation of rule 3.702 if the case law conflicts with rule 3.702. We hereby give effect to rule 3.702(b) by
Category: Criminal Procedure
687 So. 2d 827, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 64, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 19, 1997 WL 57204
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1997 | Docket: 64771046
Published
operation of rule 3.702 if the case law conflicts with rule 3.702. We hereby give effect to rule 3.702(b) by
Category: Criminal Procedure
687 So. 2d 930, 1997 WL 47636
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1997 | Docket: 595737
Published
not been set forth in a written order. Under rule 3.702(d)(18)(A) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
685 So. 2d 1277, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 5, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 2155, 1996 WL 726856
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1996 | Docket: 64770230
Published
the provisions of subsection 921.001(5) apply.
Rule 3.702(d)(19) (emphasis added). On appeal, the First
Category: Criminal Procedure
696 So. 2d 774, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12325, 1996 WL 670445
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1996 | Docket: 64774797
Published
written objection to the amount assessed. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(1); Wilson v. State, 675 So.2d 613 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
682 So. 2d 1232, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12242, 1996 WL 670556
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1996 | Docket: 64769035
Published
921.0016(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1995), and rule 3.702(d)(18), Florida Rules Criminal Procedures On
Category: Criminal Procedure
680 So. 2d 1102, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10476, 1996 WL 583171
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1996 | Docket: 64768125
Published
sentencing directly causes physical harm. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(5).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
W. SHARP and
Category: Criminal Procedure
680 So. 2d 547, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7864, 1996 WL 413708
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1996 | Docket: 64767881
Published
these sanctions only in the disjunctive, the rule 3.702 guidelines have been construed in the same manner
Category: Criminal Procedure
677 So. 2d 393, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7842, 1996 WL 411389
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1996 | Docket: 64766319
Published
possession of a semiautomatic weapon. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(12). The state concedes that it presented
Category: Criminal Procedure
674 So. 2d 908, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5693, 1996 WL 293422
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1996 | Docket: 64765080
Published
delineating the reasons for departure as required by rule 3.702(d)(18) and section 921.0016(l)(c), Florida Statutes
Category: Criminal Procedure
671 So. 2d 295, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3715, 1996 WL 169245
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1996 | Docket: 64763731
Published
See § 921.006(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(18). See also Capers v. State, 670 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
669 So. 2d 1171, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3312, 1996 WL 148744
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1996 | Docket: 64763239
Published
001(4)(b), 921.001(5), 921.0014(2) Fla.Stat. (1995); Rule 3.702(b), Fla. R.Crim.P.; see also Gardner v. State
Category: Criminal Procedure
677 So. 2d 309, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2238, 1996 WL 100837
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1996 | Docket: 64766302
Published
superseded by the operation of this rule[,]” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(b), existing caselaw3 construes language
Category: Criminal Procedure
666 So. 2d 231, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13488, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 111
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1995 | Docket: 64761321
Published
641 So.2d 934 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). See also Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(19).1
Since the sentence exceeds the
Category: Criminal Procedure
663 So. 2d 680, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12445, 1995 WL 703524
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1995 | Docket: 64760327
Published
40 to over 40 as in the instant case. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(16).
Accordingly, we reverse and remand
Category: Criminal Procedure
662 So. 2d 1035, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12299, 1995 WL 691960
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1995 | Docket: 64760148
Published
parameters for applying the multiplier. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(16). The state concedes this error.
Accordingly
Category: Criminal Procedure
665 So. 2d 262, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11736, 1995 WL 664581
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1995 | Docket: 64761028
Published
single guidelines scoresheet prepared pursuant to Rule 3.702, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, the rule
Category: Criminal Procedure
661 So. 2d 400, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10646, 1995 WL 601303
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 1995 | Docket: 64759245
Published
was not as comprehensive as is contemplated by Rule 3.702(d)(1), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure. As
Category: Criminal Procedure
660 So. 2d 383, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9711, 1995 WL 544145
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 1995 | Docket: 64758663
Published
Guidelines, 628 So.2d 1084, 1094 (Fla.1993); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702 (1994). The trial court also erred when it
Category: Criminal Procedure
656 So. 2d 525, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5726, 1995 WL 316349
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1995 | Docket: 64757224
Published
found in section 921.0016, Florida Statutes, and Rule 3.702, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, apply to
Category: Criminal Procedure
652 So. 2d 1282, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3690, 1995 WL 215010
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1995 | Docket: 64755356
Published
affirmed. See § 921.0014(1), Fla.Stat. (1993); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(16). However, Appellant and the state
Category: Criminal Procedure
Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Nov 17, 1994 | Docket: 3256652
Published
921.0011(2), Fla. Stat. (1993). And see, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(2).
11 Section 921.0011(5), Fla. Stat. (1993)
Category: Criminal Procedure
647 So. 2d 236, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11104, 1994 WL 637296
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1994 | Docket: 64752915
Published
shall review the scoresheet for accuracy.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(1) (1994). Neither rule imposes on the
Category: Criminal Procedure
641 So. 2d 496, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8367, 1994 WL 454877
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1994 | Docket: 64750412
Published
guidelines clarifies the issue by providing in rule 3.702(d)(8) (1994) that "[p]rior record shall include
Category: Criminal Procedure
628 So. 2d 1084, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 617, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1928, 1993 WL 490876
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 1993 | Docket: 64744908
Published
that date. We have, therefore, amended proposed rule 3.702 to delete any references to defendants’ electing
Category: Criminal Procedure