Cases Citing Rule 3.700
Total Results: 104
396 So. 2d 1107
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1981 | Docket: 1732035
Cited 274 times | Published
probation. The term "sentence" is defined in rule 3.700 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure as
Category: Criminal Procedure
668 So. 2d 589, 1996 WL 73777
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1996 | Docket: 1290372
Cited 66 times | Published
General and Special Conditions of Probation
Rule 3.700(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, states
Category: Criminal Procedure
789 So. 2d 1114, 2001 WL 692352
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2001 | Docket: 1696029
Cited 58 times | Published
by the court of the penalty imposed...." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(a). Contemplating oral pronouncement under
Category: Criminal Procedure
674 So. 2d 123, 1996 WL 271193
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 23, 1996 | Docket: 1661895
Cited 48 times | Published
2d DCA 1992). Application of the dictates of rule 3.700 to conditions of probation is consistent with
Category: Criminal Procedure
417 So. 2d 631
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1982 | Docket: 2518731
Cited 40 times | Published
imposition of sentence. *636 See, e.g., Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700; 3.810; and 3.850.
The trial court made written
Category: Criminal Procedure
849 F.3d 1321, 2017 WL 836035, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3852, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1238
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 3, 2017 | Docket: 4613411
Cited 31 times | Published
351 So.2d 387, 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.700. Second, Florida law indicates that Rule
Category: Criminal Procedure
336 So. 2d 65
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1976 | Docket: 2521736
Cited 30 times | Published
650 Rule 3.670 Rule 3.680
Rule 3.690 Rule 3.700 Rule 3.720
Rule 3.730 Rule 3.740 Rule
Category: Criminal Procedure
128 So. 3d 832, 2013 WL 6083405, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18426
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 2013 | Docket: 60237174
Cited 24 times | Published
thirty days credit for every month they serve.
. Rule 3.700(c)(1) provides in full:
In any case, other than
Category: Criminal Procedure
609 So. 2d 640, 1992 WL 251027
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1992 | Docket: 1473391
Cited 22 times | Published
525 So.2d 458 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). See also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700. He makes this challenge without regard to
Category: Criminal Procedure
3 So. 3d 1149, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 208, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 245, 2009 WL 395782
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2009 | Docket: 1652723
Cited 21 times | Published
preside at a sentencing proceeding. We disagree. Rule 3.700(c)(2) provides:
(c) Sentencing Judge.
....
(2)
Category: Criminal Procedure
409 So. 2d 71
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 1982 | Docket: 1525384
Cited 21 times | Published
the defendant," that is, the sentence, see Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.700, does not occur until the pronouncement
Category: Criminal Procedure
351 So. 2d 387
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1977 | Docket: 1246716
Cited 20 times | Published
considered a resentence for a longer term. Criminal Rule 3.700 provides in part:
(a) The term sentence means
Category: Criminal Procedure
884 So. 2d 482, 2004 WL 2254537
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 2004 | Docket: 1282202
Cited 19 times | Published
mean that the designation is a sentencing error. Rule 3.700(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, defines
Category: Criminal Procedure
414 So. 2d 1117
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1982 | Docket: 1358449
Cited 18 times | Published
actual sentence pronounced in open court. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.700. As stated in Toombs v. State, 404 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
428 So. 2d 369
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1983 | Docket: 1720116
Cited 16 times | Published
thoroughly acquainted himself with the record [Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.700(c)], and that he did not consider appellant's
Category: Criminal Procedure
377 So. 2d 824
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1979 | Docket: 1521715
Cited 15 times | Published
other than the trial judge to impose a sentence.
Rule 3.700(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
816 So. 2d 1180, 2002 WL 1020757
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2002 | Docket: 1559917
Cited 14 times | Published
to justify resentencing by a successor judge. Rule 3.700(c)(1) provides, in part:
In any case, other than
Category: Criminal Procedure
663 So. 2d 1343, 1995 WL 621335
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1995 | Docket: 1313601
Cited 11 times | Published
Nonetheless, application of the mandatory dictates of rule 3.700 to conditions of probation is logically consistent
Category: Criminal Procedure
717 So. 2d 1076, 1998 WL 537327
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 1998 | Docket: 1164435
Cited 10 times | Published
possible, determine the motion to mitigate. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.700(c)(1)(if sentence is to be pronounced by
Category: Criminal Procedure
351 So. 2d 89
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 1977 | Docket: 1246717
Cited 10 times | Published
facts of this appeal. We point out that Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700(a) defines "sentence" to mean "the pronouncement
Category: Criminal Procedure
889 So. 2d 935, 2004 WL 2921886
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2004 | Docket: 1488060
Cited 9 times | Published
remanded for resentencing in accordance with rule 3.700(c)(1). Id.
In the present case, petitioner did
Category: Criminal Procedure
683 So. 2d 1093, 1996 WL 668423
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1996 | Docket: 1514982
Cited 9 times | Published
judge who presided at appellant's plea hearing. Rule 3.700(c)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides:
Category: Criminal Procedure
606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1992 | Docket: 2191048
Cited 9 times | Published
apter 76-138, Laws of Florida.
XIV. SENTENCE
RULE 3.700. SENTENCE DEFINED; PRONOUNCEMENT AND ENTRY; SENTENCING
Category: Criminal Procedure
602 So. 2d 1240, 1992 WL 125113
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1992 | Docket: 1321726
Cited 8 times | Published
conclude that Corbett's first claim is dispositive. Rule 3.700(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, states:
Category: Criminal Procedure
988 So. 2d 152, 2008 WL 2987160
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2008 | Docket: 1384442
Cited 7 times | Published
initially imposed sentence in this case. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700; Lester v. State, 446 So.2d 1088, 1090 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
909 So. 2d 364, 2005 WL 1787446
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 2005 | Docket: 1663292
Cited 7 times | Published
"necessity" requirement of rule 3.700(c)(1)).
We first question whether rule 3.700(c)(1) even applies to this
Category: Criminal Procedure
757 So. 2d 1256, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1162
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 2000 | Docket: 1331418
Cited 7 times | Published
State, 669 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(b). Minimum due process requirements are
Category: Criminal Procedure
681 So. 2d 901, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11110, 1996 WL 603787
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1996 | Docket: 1722208
Cited 7 times | Published
a "sentence" but a "final disposition" under rule 3.700(b). Because Waite was not "adjudged guilty,"
Category: Criminal Procedure
637 So. 2d 972, 1994 WL 241730
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1994 | Docket: 422485
Cited 7 times | Published
motion for new trial and impose sentence. *977 Rule 3.700(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides:
Category: Criminal Procedure
905 So. 2d 1045, 2005 WL 1648779
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2005 | Docket: 1307876
Cited 6 times | Published
In Clemons, 816 So.2d at 1182, we held that rule 3.700(c)(1) was violated where the original judge had
Category: Criminal Procedure
870 So. 2d 140, 2004 WL 32387
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2004 | Docket: 1330555
Cited 6 times | Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.700(c)(1). Rule 3.700(c)(1) provides as follows:
In any case, other
Category: Criminal Procedure
780 So. 2d 955, 2001 WL 195060
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2001 | Docket: 1708603
Cited 6 times | Published
hearing. Instead, the court stayed the sentence. Rule 3.700(b) requires the oral pronouncement of sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
543 So. 2d 299, 1989 WL 41182
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1989 | Docket: 1729702
Cited 6 times | Published
substantive law, of the sentencing guidelines, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700 and 3.988, were constitutionally invalid
Category: Criminal Procedure
430 So. 2d 574
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1983 | Docket: 445988
Cited 6 times | Published
trial court's rulings in this case.
[5] See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700(c).
Category: Criminal Procedure
959 So. 2d 817, 2007 WL 1931286
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2007 | Docket: 1525776
Cited 5 times | Published
contends that Judge Holmes failed to comply with rule 3.700(c)(1) when she surmised what occurred during
Category: Criminal Procedure
898 So. 2d 266, 2005 WL 623237
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 2005 | Docket: 1732309
Cited 5 times | Published
even though counsel did not specifically cite rule 3.700(c)(1) or any case authority. Baskin's objection
Category: Criminal Procedure
821 So. 2d 411, 2002 WL 1559557
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 2002 | Docket: 1235755
Cited 5 times | Published
not comply with the necessity requirement of rule 3.700(c)(1). Accordingly, we vacate Persaud's sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
703 So. 2d 1097, 1997 WL 716828
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1997 | Docket: 1349331
Cited 5 times | Published
So.2d at 976. The Kelley court went on to cite rule 3.700, which permits a successor who has become acquainted
Category: Criminal Procedure
638 So. 2d 631, 1994 WL 316692
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1994 | Docket: 1652533
Cited 5 times | Published
trial court's pronouncement in open court. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700; Kord v. State, 508 So.2d 758 (Fla. 4th DCA
Category: Criminal Procedure
351 So. 2d 375
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1977 | Docket: 378277
Cited 5 times | Published
judge, acted within his authority under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700(c) by taking into consideration the jury's
Category: Criminal Procedure
158 So. 3d 504, 2015 WL 686047
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2015 | Docket: 60294044
Cited 4 times | Published
this case for a new penalty phase. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(c)(2) (“In any capital case in which it
Category: Criminal Procedure
59 So. 3d 225, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4000, 2011 WL 1086593
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 2011 | Docket: 2554325
Cited 4 times | Published
3.800(b)(2) motion challenging a violation of rule 3.700(c)(1)); Hakkenberg v. State, 889 So.2d 935 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
860 So. 2d 1041, 2003 WL 22867623
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2003 | Docket: 454773
Cited 4 times | Published
"necessary" that another judge preside. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(c); Lawley v. State, 377 So.2d 824 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
611 So. 2d 16, 1992 WL 379858
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1992 | Docket: 1699441
Cited 4 times | Published
conducting a new sentencing hearing in accordance with Rule 3.700(c), the court may impose such sentence as it
Category: Criminal Procedure
463 So. 2d 1230, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 438
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1985 | Docket: 1509689
Cited 4 times | Published
be imposed following an adjudication of guilt. Rule 3.700(a), Fla.R. Crim.P.; Corn v. State, 332 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
918 So. 2d 1011, 2006 WL 167661
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2006 | Docket: 1715285
Cited 3 times | Published
necessary, the substitution was not proper under rule 3.700[(1)(c)]." 816 So.2d at 1182. We therefore reversed
Category: Criminal Procedure
842 So. 2d 954, 2003 WL 1618910
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2003 | Docket: 1730468
Cited 3 times | Published
the defendant has been adjudged guilty." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(a). Contemplating oral pronouncement of
Category: Criminal Procedure
304 So. 2d 139
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1974 | Docket: 1437864
Cited 3 times | Published
and conditions of probation. Williams, supra. Rule 3.700 RCrP defines sentence as "the pronouncement by
Category: Criminal Procedure
988 So. 2d 1170, 2008 WL 2986483
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2008 | Docket: 1384995
Cited 2 times | Published
limited to a punishment handed down by a court. Rule 3.700(a) provides that "[t]he term sentence means the
Category: Criminal Procedure
970 So. 2d 468, 2007 WL 4322278
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2007 | Docket: 1324772
Cited 2 times | Published
sentencing by a successor judge necessary under rule 3.700(c)(1). See Clemons v. State, 816 So.2d 1180,
Category: Criminal Procedure
970 So. 2d 376, 2007 WL 3085164
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2007 | Docket: 1695487
Cited 2 times | Published
therefore is not reviewable under 3.800(a). See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(1)(defining a sentence as "the pronouncement
Category: Criminal Procedure
962 So. 2d 341, 2007 WL 1789264
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2007 | Docket: 1519074
Cited 2 times | Published
668 So.2d 589, 591-92 (Fla.1996); see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(b). However, in this case, Mr. Critelli
Category: Criminal Procedure
950 So. 2d 516, 2007 WL 750636
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2007 | Docket: 1501893
Cited 2 times | Published
accepted his plea to sentence him. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(c)(1). Although the State notes that defense
Category: Criminal Procedure
939 So. 2d 1168, 2006 WL 3018393
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2006 | Docket: 1180459
Cited 2 times | Published
being sentenced by a successor judge violated rule 3.700(c)(1), which provides:
Noncapital Cases. In any
Category: Criminal Procedure
910 So. 2d 890, 2005 WL 2105698
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 2005 | Docket: 1494781
Cited 2 times | Published
violation of probation proceedings. Although rule 3.700(c) directs, absent extraordinary circumstances
Category: Criminal Procedure
898 So. 2d 1203, 2005 WL 840033
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2005 | Docket: 306728
Cited 2 times | Published
2d 411, 414 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(c); Baskin v. State, 898 So.2d 266, 266
Category: Criminal Procedure
896 So. 2d 920, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2527, 2005 WL 476394
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2005 | Docket: 64836892
Cited 2 times | Published
pronouncement of the disposition. Compare Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(b) with Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.115(c).
Since
Category: Criminal Procedure
801 So. 2d 284, 2001 WL 1575750
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2001 | Docket: 1744766
Cited 2 times | Published
probation was not pronounced at the resentencing.
Rule 3.700 provides that "[e]very sentence or other final
Category: Criminal Procedure
722 So. 2d 211, 1998 WL 316558
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1998 | Docket: 1241632
Cited 2 times | Published
the defendant has been adjudged guilty." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700. Such a sentence is illegal. "A court may
Category: Criminal Procedure
46 So. 3d 1189, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 16739, 2010 WL 4366018
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2010 | Docket: 60296149
Cited 1 times | Published
State, 970 So.2d 468 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.700(c)(1).
Category: Criminal Procedure
724 So. 2d 128, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14887, 1998 WL 821723
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 1998 | Docket: 64785458
Cited 1 times | Published
State, 611 So.2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(c)(1).
Defendant also contends that the
Category: Criminal Procedure
538 So. 2d 123, 1989 WL 10927
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1989 | Docket: 472327
Cited 1 times | Published
the defendant," that is, the sentence, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700, does not occur until the pronouncement is
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2025 | Docket: 70454061
Published
the legal sentence
imposed”); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.700(a)–(b) (defining
“sentence” to be “the
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2020 | Docket: 18435266
Published
sentencing
related matters. However, on its face, rule 3.700(c) is applicable
only when a sentence is pronounced
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2020 | Docket: 16761642
Published
parole is not
“pronounce[d] by the court.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.700(a).
Amendment 4 thus uses the word
Category: Criminal Procedure
263 So. 3d 199
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 2019 | Docket: 64702746
Published
(citing Richardson , 821 So.2d at 430 ).
See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.700(c)(1).
Category: Criminal Procedure
263 So. 3d 199
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 2019 | Docket: 64702747
Published
(citing Richardson , 821 So.2d at 430 ).
See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.700(c)(1).
Category: Criminal Procedure
261 So. 3d 649
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2018 | Docket: 8020198
Published
to orally designate him as an HFO. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.700(a),
(b); Akins, 69 So. 3d at 269 ("
Category: Criminal Procedure
241 So. 3d 908
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2018 | Docket: 6304677
Published
oral pronouncement of June 29, 2016. See Fla.
R. Crim. P. 3.700(a) ("The term sentence means the pronouncement
Category: Criminal Procedure
198 So. 3d 843, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3765, 2016 WL 937878
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 2016 | Docket: 3044935
Published
sentence shall be determined in accordance with rule 3.700.
See Clemons v. State,
816 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
158 So. 3d 504, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 93, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 280
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2015 | Docket: 2635437
Published
this case for a new penalty phase. See Fla. R. Crim. P.
3.700(c)(2) (“In any capital case in which it
Category: Criminal Procedure
106 So. 3d 45, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1541, 2013 WL 376064
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2013 | Docket: 60228202
Published
is illegal and should be stricken. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(b) (“Every sentence or other final disposition
Category: Criminal Procedure
99 So. 3d 559, 2012 WL 3705170, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14341
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2012 | Docket: 60313093
Published
the defendant has been adjudged guilty.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(a).
Category: Criminal Procedure
45 So. 3d 1, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5586, 2010 WL 1687639
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2010 | Docket: 2399595
Published
violation of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.700(c). Craig asserts no valid reason why this issue
Category: Criminal Procedure
12 So. 3d 817, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5865, 2009 WL 1424084
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2009 | Docket: 60233832
Published
plea and the offense.
This court has held that rule 3.700(c)(1) makes it improper for a successor judge
Category: Criminal Procedure
9 So. 3d 648, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2266, 2009 WL 723494
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2009 | Docket: 2587131
Published
at the time the court sentenced him. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(a) ("Sentence defined. The term sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
964 So. 2d 888, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15164, 2007 WL 2781026
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2007 | Docket: 64852464
Published
remand for resentencing in that case. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(b) (“Every sentence or other final disposition
Category: Criminal Procedure
958 So. 2d 442, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6633, 2007 WL 1263502
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 2007 | Docket: 64851007
Published
is the exact opposite of what is required by rule 3.700(c)(1).
While the successor judge did impose the
Category: Criminal Procedure
919 So. 2d 599, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 363, 2006 WL 119858
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2006 | Docket: 64842045
Published
independent evaluation of the case. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(c); Spencer v. State, 611 So.2d 16 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
913 So. 2d 1289, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18262, 2005 WL 3077429
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2005 | Docket: 64840857
Published
no motion “for clarification” is authorized by rule 3.700. As a practical matter, unless this alleged scrivener’s
Category: Criminal Procedure
913 So. 2d 737, 2005 WL 2863012
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2005 | Docket: 355014
Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.700(a). Rule 3.700(a) is not a cognizable vehicle by which post-conviction
Category: Criminal Procedure
905 So. 2d 268, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10048, 2005 WL 1521393
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2005 | Docket: 64839389
Published
2d 603, 603 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(c)(1).
Therefore, we reverse Quijije’s sentences
Category: Criminal Procedure
868 So. 2d 675, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 4075, 2004 WL 624973
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2004 | Docket: 64829012
Published
Appellant’s motion purported to be filed pursuant to rule 3.700(a), the trial court correctly treated the motion
Category: Criminal Procedure
846 So. 2d 613, 2003 WL 21203102
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2003 | Docket: 1301459
Published
why a substitute judge was required. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(c); Lawley v. State, 377 So.2d 824 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
837 So. 2d 1164, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2173, 2003 WL 469138
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2003 | Docket: 64820891
Published
including the mandatory minimum sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(b) (“Every sentence or other final disposition
Category: Criminal Procedure
837 So. 2d 425, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13444, 2002 WL 31060535
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 2002 | Docket: 64820702
Published
Rules of Criminal Procedure were adopted in 1968, Rule 3.700 was included as a rewrite of section 921.05,
Category: Criminal Procedure
820 So. 2d 1057, 2002 WL 1466553
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2002 | Docket: 1362281
Published
The trial court ultimately denied the motion.
Rule 3.700(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires
Category: Criminal Procedure
802 So. 2d 501, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18281, 2001 WL 1643847
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2001 | Docket: 64811039
Published
KLEIN, J.
Rule 3.700(c)(1) requires that, when a sentence is being imposed by a judge other than the
Category: Criminal Procedure
791 So. 2d 586, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11455, 2001 WL 912752
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2001 | Docket: 64807414
Published
year minimum mandatory sentence for count 2. Rule 3.700(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
773 So. 2d 113, 2000 WL 1854000
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2000 | Docket: 1687575
Published
the defendant," that is, the sentence, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700, does not occur until the pronouncement is
Category: Criminal Procedure
779 So. 2d 1290, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 906, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2271, 2000 WL 1535283
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2000 | Docket: 64804300
Published
Statutes. See § 948.01(2), Fla. Stat. (1999);2 Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(a)(“The term sentence means the pronouncement
Category: Criminal Procedure
760 So. 2d 67, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 527, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 1988, 1999 WL 1029286
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1999 | Docket: 64797895
Published
hand-delivered copy.
RULE 3.700(b)
Next, we turn to the proposed amendment to rule 3.700(b), Pronouncement
Category: Criminal Procedure
739 So. 2d 602, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8383, 1997 WL 408316
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1997 | Docket: 64790276
Published
not render a judge unavailable for purposes of rule 3.700. In my view, declining to preside over a resentenc-ing
Category: Criminal Procedure
691 So. 2d 647, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3998, 1997 WL 186462
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1997 | Docket: 64772486
Published
must be orally pronounced at sentencing. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(b); Justice v. State, 674 So.2d 123 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
674 So. 2d 123, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 219, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 1009
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 23, 1996 | Docket: 64764918
Published
2d DCA 1992). Application of the dictates of rule 3.700 to conditions of probation is consistent with
Category: Criminal Procedure
677 So. 2d 307, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2232, 1996 WL 100795
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1996 | Docket: 64766301
Published
case shall be pronounced in open court.” Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.700(b). See also Armstead v. State, 612 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
633 So. 2d 1056, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 126, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 354, 1994 WL 70436
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1994 | Docket: 64747006
Published
decision in McCoy.
The proposed amendment to rule 3.700 is also in response to a request by this Court
Category: Criminal Procedure
566 So. 2d 825, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6360, 1990 WL 121405
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 1990 | Docket: 64652928
Published
court held that a trial court had complied with rule 3.700(c), Florida Rules Criminal Procedure, by taking
Category: Criminal Procedure
540 So. 2d 939, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 913, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1909, 1989 WL 33949
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1989 | Docket: 64641398
Published
resentencing:
1. The trial court shall comply with rule 3.700(c) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure;
Category: Criminal Procedure
540 So. 2d 939, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 913, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1909, 1989 WL 33949
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1989 | Docket: 64641398
Published
resentencing:
1. The trial court shall comply with rule 3.700(c) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure;
Category: Criminal Procedure
407 So. 2d 1037, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22114
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1981 | Docket: 64587088
Published
The Lawley decision emphasized the fact that Rule 3.700(c) provides for sentencing by a judge other than
Category: Criminal Procedure
407 So. 2d 353, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21907
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1981 | Docket: 64586787
Published
Procedure, 196 So.2d 124 at 171 (Fla.1967); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700, 3.790(a)(b).
BOARDMAN, A. C. J., and RYDER
Category: Criminal Procedure
350 So. 2d 798, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16456
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1977 | Docket: 64560575
Published
provided the provisions of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700(c) are complied with. Rule 3.700(c) provides that the sentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
344 So. 2d 250, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15603
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1977 | Docket: 64557947
Published
that Judge Swigert failed to comply with Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700(c) which provides:
“In those cases where
Category: Criminal Procedure