Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.700 - SENTENCE DEFINED; PRONOUNCEMENT AND | Syfert Law

Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.700

RULE 3.700. SENTENCE DEFINED; PRONOUNCEMENT AND
ENTRY; SENTENCING JUDGE


(a) Sentence Defined. The term sentence means the
pronouncement by the court of the penalty imposed on a defendant
for the offense of which the defendant has been adjudged guilty.

(b) Pronouncement and Entry. Every sentence or other
final disposition of the case shall be pronounced in open court,
including, if available at the time of sentencing, the amount of jail
time credit the defendant is to receive. The final disposition of every
case shall be entered in the minutes in courts in which minutes are
kept and shall be docketed in courts that do not maintain minutes.

(c) Sentencing Judge.

(1) Noncapital Cases. In any case, other than a capital
case, in which it is necessary that sentence be pronounced by a
judge other than the judge who presided at trial or accepted the
plea, the sentencing judge shall not pass sentence until the judge
becomes acquainted with what transpired at the trial, or the facts,
including any plea discussions, concerning the plea and the offense.
(2) Capital Cases. In any capital case in which it is
necessary that sentence be pronounced by a judge other than the
judge who presided at the capital trial, the sentencing judge shall
conduct a new sentencing proceeding before a jury prior to passing
sentence.

Committee Notes

1968 Adoption. This rule is a revamped version of section
921.05, Florida Statutes.

1972 Amendment. Subdivisions (a) and (b) are substantially
the same as in former rule. Subdivision (c) was added to emphasize
that the sentencing procedure should be conducted by the trial
judge or the judge taking the plea. The rule makes provision for
emergency situations when such judge is unavailable.

Cases Citing Rule 3.700

Total Results: 104

Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Com'n

396 So. 2d 1107

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1981 | Docket: 1732035

Cited 274 times | Published

probation. The term "sentence" is defined in rule 3.700 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure as

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Hart

668 So. 2d 589, 1996 WL 73777

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1996 | Docket: 1290372

Cited 66 times | Published

General and Special Conditions of Probation Rule 3.700(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, states

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harris v. State

789 So. 2d 1114, 2001 WL 692352

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2001 | Docket: 1696029

Cited 58 times | Published

by the court of the penalty imposed...." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(a). Contemplating oral pronouncement under

Category: Criminal Procedure

Justice v. State

674 So. 2d 123, 1996 WL 271193

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 23, 1996 | Docket: 1661895

Cited 48 times | Published

2d DCA 1992). Application of the dictates of rule 3.700 to conditions of probation is consistent with

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ferguson v. State

417 So. 2d 631

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1982 | Docket: 2518731

Cited 40 times | Published

imposition of sentence. *636 See, e.g., Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700; 3.810; and 3.850. The trial court made written

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ace Patterson v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

849 F.3d 1321, 2017 WL 836035, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3852, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1238

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 3, 2017 | Docket: 4613411

Cited 31 times | Published

351 So.2d 387, 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.700. Second, Florida law indicates that Rule

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Terry

336 So. 2d 65

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1976 | Docket: 2521736

Cited 30 times | Published

650 Rule 3.670 Rule 3.680 Rule 3.690 Rule 3.700 Rule 3.720 Rule 3.730 Rule 3.740 Rule

Category: Criminal Procedure

Peters v. State

128 So. 3d 832, 2013 WL 6083405, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18426

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 2013 | Docket: 60237174

Cited 24 times | Published

thirty days credit for every month they serve. . Rule 3.700(c)(1) provides in full: In any case, other than

Category: Criminal Procedure

Olvey v. State

609 So. 2d 640, 1992 WL 251027

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1992 | Docket: 1473391

Cited 22 times | Published

525 So.2d 458 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). See also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700. He makes this challenge without regard to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Muehleman v. State

3 So. 3d 1149, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 208, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 245, 2009 WL 395782

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2009 | Docket: 1652723

Cited 21 times | Published

preside at a sentencing proceeding. We disagree. Rule 3.700(c)(2) provides: (c) Sentencing Judge. .... (2)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Farber v. State

409 So. 2d 71

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 1982 | Docket: 1525384

Cited 21 times | Published

the defendant," that is, the sentence, see Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.700, does not occur until the pronouncement

Category: Criminal Procedure

Flowers v. State

351 So. 2d 387

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1977 | Docket: 1246716

Cited 20 times | Published

considered a resentence for a longer term. Criminal Rule 3.700 provides in part: (a) The term sentence means

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cabrera v. State

884 So. 2d 482, 2004 WL 2254537

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 2004 | Docket: 1282202

Cited 19 times | Published

mean that the designation is a sentencing error. Rule 3.700(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, defines

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kelly v. State

414 So. 2d 1117

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1982 | Docket: 1358449

Cited 18 times | Published

actual sentence pronounced in open court. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.700. As stated in Toombs v. State, 404 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

428 So. 2d 369

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1983 | Docket: 1720116

Cited 16 times | Published

thoroughly acquainted himself with the record [Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.700(c)], and that he did not consider appellant's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lawley v. State

377 So. 2d 824

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1979 | Docket: 1521715

Cited 15 times | Published

other than the trial judge to impose a sentence. Rule 3.700(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Clemons v. State

816 So. 2d 1180, 2002 WL 1020757

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2002 | Docket: 1559917

Cited 14 times | Published

to justify resentencing by a successor judge. Rule 3.700(c)(1) provides, in part: In any case, other than

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vasquez v. State

663 So. 2d 1343, 1995 WL 621335

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1995 | Docket: 1313601

Cited 11 times | Published

Nonetheless, application of the mandatory dictates of rule 3.700 to conditions of probation is logically consistent

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lusskin v. State

717 So. 2d 1076, 1998 WL 537327

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 1998 | Docket: 1164435

Cited 10 times | Published

possible, determine the motion to mitigate. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.700(c)(1)(if sentence is to be pronounced by

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Wilcox

351 So. 2d 89

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 1977 | Docket: 1246717

Cited 10 times | Published

facts of this appeal. We point out that Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700(a) defines "sentence" to mean "the pronouncement

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hakkenberg v. State

889 So. 2d 935, 2004 WL 2921886

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2004 | Docket: 1488060

Cited 9 times | Published

remanded for resentencing in accordance with rule 3.700(c)(1). Id. In the present case, petitioner did

Category: Criminal Procedure

Madrigal v. State

683 So. 2d 1093, 1996 WL 668423

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1996 | Docket: 1514982

Cited 9 times | Published

judge who presided at appellant's plea hearing. Rule 3.700(c)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides:

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.

606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1992 | Docket: 2191048

Cited 9 times | Published

apter 76-138, Laws of Florida. XIV. SENTENCE RULE 3.700. SENTENCE DEFINED; PRONOUNCEMENT AND ENTRY; SENTENCING

Category: Criminal Procedure

Corbett v. State

602 So. 2d 1240, 1992 WL 125113

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1992 | Docket: 1321726

Cited 8 times | Published

conclude that Corbett's first claim is dispositive. Rule 3.700(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, states:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gorham v. State

988 So. 2d 152, 2008 WL 2987160

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2008 | Docket: 1384442

Cited 7 times | Published

initially imposed sentence in this case. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700; Lester v. State, 446 So.2d 1088, 1090 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Scott v. State

909 So. 2d 364, 2005 WL 1787446

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 2005 | Docket: 1663292

Cited 7 times | Published

"necessity" requirement of rule 3.700(c)(1)). We first question whether rule 3.700(c)(1) even applies to this

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rothery v. State

757 So. 2d 1256, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1162

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 2000 | Docket: 1331418

Cited 7 times | Published

State, 669 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(b). Minimum due process requirements are

Category: Criminal Procedure

Waite v. City of Fort Lauderdale

681 So. 2d 901, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11110, 1996 WL 603787

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1996 | Docket: 1722208

Cited 7 times | Published

a "sentence" but a "final disposition" under rule 3.700(b). Because Waite was not "adjudged guilty,"

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kelley v. State

637 So. 2d 972, 1994 WL 241730

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1994 | Docket: 422485

Cited 7 times | Published

motion for new trial and impose sentence. *977 Rule 3.700(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lopez v. State

905 So. 2d 1045, 2005 WL 1648779

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2005 | Docket: 1307876

Cited 6 times | Published

In Clemons, 816 So.2d at 1182, we held that rule 3.700(c)(1) was violated where the original judge had

Category: Criminal Procedure

Snyder v. State

870 So. 2d 140, 2004 WL 32387

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2004 | Docket: 1330555

Cited 6 times | Published

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.700(c)(1). Rule 3.700(c)(1) provides as follows: In any case, other

Category: Criminal Procedure

Adams v. State

780 So. 2d 955, 2001 WL 195060

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2001 | Docket: 1708603

Cited 6 times | Published

hearing. Instead, the court stayed the sentence. Rule 3.700(b) requires the oral pronouncement of sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wahl v. State

543 So. 2d 299, 1989 WL 41182

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1989 | Docket: 1729702

Cited 6 times | Published

substantive law, of the sentencing guidelines, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700 and 3.988, were constitutionally invalid

Category: Criminal Procedure

Folske v. State

430 So. 2d 574

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1983 | Docket: 445988

Cited 6 times | Published

trial court's rulings in this case. [5] See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700(c).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kaduk v. State

959 So. 2d 817, 2007 WL 1931286

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2007 | Docket: 1525776

Cited 5 times | Published

contends that Judge Holmes failed to comply with rule 3.700(c)(1) when she surmised what occurred during

Category: Criminal Procedure

Baskin v. State

898 So. 2d 266, 2005 WL 623237

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 2005 | Docket: 1732309

Cited 5 times | Published

even though counsel did not specifically cite rule 3.700(c)(1) or any case authority. Baskin's objection

Category: Criminal Procedure

Persaud v. State

821 So. 2d 411, 2002 WL 1559557

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 2002 | Docket: 1235755

Cited 5 times | Published

not comply with the necessity requirement of rule 3.700(c)(1). Accordingly, we vacate Persaud's sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. May

703 So. 2d 1097, 1997 WL 716828

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1997 | Docket: 1349331

Cited 5 times | Published

So.2d at 976. The Kelley court went on to cite rule 3.700, which permits a successor who has become acquainted

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bartlett v. State

638 So. 2d 631, 1994 WL 316692

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1994 | Docket: 1652533

Cited 5 times | Published

trial court's pronouncement in open court. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700; Kord v. State, 508 So.2d 758 (Fla. 4th DCA

Category: Criminal Procedure

Castor v. State

351 So. 2d 375

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1977 | Docket: 378277

Cited 5 times | Published

judge, acted within his authority under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700(c) by taking into consideration the jury's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Oyola v. State

158 So. 3d 504, 2015 WL 686047

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2015 | Docket: 60294044

Cited 4 times | Published

this case for a new penalty phase. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(c)(2) (“In any capital case in which it

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pifer v. State

59 So. 3d 225, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4000, 2011 WL 1086593

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 2011 | Docket: 2554325

Cited 4 times | Published

3.800(b)(2) motion challenging a violation of rule 3.700(c)(1)); Hakkenberg v. State, 889 So.2d 935 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cowart v. State

860 So. 2d 1041, 2003 WL 22867623

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2003 | Docket: 454773

Cited 4 times | Published

"necessary" that another judge preside. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(c); Lawley v. State, 377 So.2d 824 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Spencer v. State

611 So. 2d 16, 1992 WL 379858

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1992 | Docket: 1699441

Cited 4 times | Published

conducting a new sentencing hearing in accordance with Rule 3.700(c), the court may impose such sentence as it

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

463 So. 2d 1230, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 438

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1985 | Docket: 1509689

Cited 4 times | Published

be imposed following an adjudication of guilt. Rule 3.700(a), Fla.R. Crim.P.; Corn v. State, 332 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Horne v. State

918 So. 2d 1011, 2006 WL 167661

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2006 | Docket: 1715285

Cited 3 times | Published

necessary, the substitution was not proper under rule 3.700[(1)(c)]." 816 So.2d at 1182. We therefore reversed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ingraham v. State

842 So. 2d 954, 2003 WL 1618910

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2003 | Docket: 1730468

Cited 3 times | Published

the defendant has been adjudged guilty." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(a). Contemplating oral pronouncement of

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Caivano

304 So. 2d 139

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1974 | Docket: 1437864

Cited 3 times | Published

and conditions of probation. Williams, supra. Rule 3.700 RCrP defines sentence as "the pronouncement by

Category: Criminal Procedure

Barber v. State

988 So. 2d 1170, 2008 WL 2986483

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2008 | Docket: 1384995

Cited 2 times | Published

limited to a punishment handed down by a court. Rule 3.700(a) provides that "[t]he term sentence means the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kramer v. State

970 So. 2d 468, 2007 WL 4322278

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2007 | Docket: 1324772

Cited 2 times | Published

sentencing by a successor judge necessary under rule 3.700(c)(1). See Clemons v. State, 816 So.2d 1180,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mullins v. State

970 So. 2d 376, 2007 WL 3085164

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2007 | Docket: 1695487

Cited 2 times | Published

therefore is not reviewable under 3.800(a). See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(1)(defining a sentence as "the pronouncement

Category: Criminal Procedure

Critelli v. State

962 So. 2d 341, 2007 WL 1789264

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2007 | Docket: 1519074

Cited 2 times | Published

668 So.2d 589, 591-92 (Fla.1996); see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(b). However, in this case, Mr. Critelli

Category: Criminal Procedure

Young v. State

950 So. 2d 516, 2007 WL 750636

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2007 | Docket: 1501893

Cited 2 times | Published

accepted his plea to sentence him. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(c)(1). Although the State notes that defense

Category: Criminal Procedure

Murphy v. State

939 So. 2d 1168, 2006 WL 3018393

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2006 | Docket: 1180459

Cited 2 times | Published

being sentenced by a successor judge violated rule 3.700(c)(1), which provides: Noncapital Cases. In any

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lambert v. State

910 So. 2d 890, 2005 WL 2105698

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 2005 | Docket: 1494781

Cited 2 times | Published

violation of probation proceedings. Although rule 3.700(c) directs, absent extraordinary circumstances

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gay v. State

898 So. 2d 1203, 2005 WL 840033

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2005 | Docket: 306728

Cited 2 times | Published

2d 411, 414 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(c); Baskin v. State, 898 So.2d 266, 266

Category: Criminal Procedure

D.G. v. State

896 So. 2d 920, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2527, 2005 WL 476394

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2005 | Docket: 64836892

Cited 2 times | Published

pronouncement of the disposition. Compare Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(b) with Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.115(c). Since

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

801 So. 2d 284, 2001 WL 1575750

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2001 | Docket: 1744766

Cited 2 times | Published

probation was not pronounced at the resentencing. Rule 3.700 provides that "[e]very sentence or other final

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jett v. State

722 So. 2d 211, 1998 WL 316558

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1998 | Docket: 1241632

Cited 2 times | Published

the defendant has been adjudged guilty." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700. Such a sentence is illegal. "A court may

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lawson v. State

46 So. 3d 1189, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 16739, 2010 WL 4366018

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2010 | Docket: 60296149

Cited 1 times | Published

State, 970 So.2d 468 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.700(c)(1).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Franquiz v. State

724 So. 2d 128, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14887, 1998 WL 821723

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 1998 | Docket: 64785458

Cited 1 times | Published

State, 611 So.2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(c)(1). Defendant also contends that the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Moore v. State

538 So. 2d 123, 1989 WL 10927

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1989 | Docket: 472327

Cited 1 times | Published

the defendant," that is, the sentence, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700, does not occur until the pronouncement is

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ralph Waldo Emerson, IV v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2025 | Docket: 70454061

Published

the legal sentence imposed”); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.700(a)–(b) (defining “sentence” to be “the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Paul Thomas Kartsonis v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2020 | Docket: 18435266

Published

sentencing related matters. However, on its face, rule 3.700(c) is applicable only when a sentence is pronounced

Category: Criminal Procedure

Advisory Opinion to the Governor Re: Implementation of Amendment 4, The Voting Restoration Amendment

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2020 | Docket: 16761642

Published

parole is not “pronounce[d] by the court.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.700(a). Amendment 4 thus uses the word

Category: Criminal Procedure

Strong v. State

263 So. 3d 199

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 2019 | Docket: 64702746

Published

(citing Richardson , 821 So.2d at 430 ). See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.700(c)(1).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Strong v. State

263 So. 3d 199

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 2019 | Docket: 64702747

Published

(citing Richardson , 821 So.2d at 430 ). See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.700(c)(1).

Category: Criminal Procedure

PHILIP WALLACE STAUDERMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

261 So. 3d 649

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2018 | Docket: 8020198

Published

to orally designate him as an HFO. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.700(a), (b); Akins, 69 So. 3d at 269 ("

Category: Criminal Procedure

SAMEH SALIB SOLIMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

241 So. 3d 908

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2018 | Docket: 6304677

Published

oral pronouncement of June 29, 2016. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.700(a) ("The term sentence means the pronouncement

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wilson v. State

198 So. 3d 843, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3765, 2016 WL 937878

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 2016 | Docket: 3044935

Published

sentence shall be determined in accordance with rule 3.700. See Clemons v. State, 816 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Miguel Oyola v. State of Florida

158 So. 3d 504, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 93, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 280

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2015 | Docket: 2635437

Published

this case for a new penalty phase. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.700(c)(2) (“In any capital case in which it

Category: Criminal Procedure

Filppula v. State

106 So. 3d 45, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1541, 2013 WL 376064

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2013 | Docket: 60228202

Published

is illegal and should be stricken. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(b) (“Every sentence or other final disposition

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cajuste v. State

99 So. 3d 559, 2012 WL 3705170, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14341

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2012 | Docket: 60313093

Published

the defendant has been adjudged guilty.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(a).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Craig v. State

45 So. 3d 1, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5586, 2010 WL 1687639

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2010 | Docket: 2399595

Published

violation of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.700(c). Craig asserts no valid reason why this issue

Category: Criminal Procedure

Durbrow v. State

12 So. 3d 817, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5865, 2009 WL 1424084

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2009 | Docket: 60233832

Published

plea and the offense. This court has held that rule 3.700(c)(1) makes it improper for a successor judge

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morales v. State

9 So. 3d 648, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2266, 2009 WL 723494

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2009 | Docket: 2587131

Published

at the time the court sentenced him. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(a) ("Sentence defined. The term sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Firestone v. State

964 So. 2d 888, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15164, 2007 WL 2781026

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2007 | Docket: 64852464

Published

remand for resentencing in that case. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(b) (“Every sentence or other final disposition

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ross v. State

958 So. 2d 442, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6633, 2007 WL 1263502

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 2007 | Docket: 64851007

Published

is the exact opposite of what is required by rule 3.700(c)(1). While the successor judge did impose the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bain v. State

919 So. 2d 599, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 363, 2006 WL 119858

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2006 | Docket: 64842045

Published

independent evaluation of the case. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(c); Spencer v. State, 611 So.2d 16 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Little v. State

913 So. 2d 1289, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18262, 2005 WL 3077429

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2005 | Docket: 64840857

Published

no motion “for clarification” is authorized by rule 3.700. As a practical matter, unless this alleged scrivener’s

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lane v. State

913 So. 2d 737, 2005 WL 2863012

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2005 | Docket: 355014

Published

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.700(a). Rule 3.700(a) is not a cognizable vehicle by which post-conviction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Quijije v. State

905 So. 2d 268, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10048, 2005 WL 1521393

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2005 | Docket: 64839389

Published

2d 603, 603 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(c)(1). Therefore, we reverse Quijije’s sentences

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hurt v. State

868 So. 2d 675, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 4075, 2004 WL 624973

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2004 | Docket: 64829012

Published

Appellant’s motion purported to be filed pursuant to rule 3.700(a), the trial court correctly treated the motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mongo v. State

846 So. 2d 613, 2003 WL 21203102

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2003 | Docket: 1301459

Published

why a substitute judge was required. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(c); Lawley v. State, 377 So.2d 824 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sumpter v. State

837 So. 2d 1164, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2173, 2003 WL 469138

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2003 | Docket: 64820891

Published

including the mandatory minimum sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(b) (“Every sentence or other final disposition

Category: Criminal Procedure

N.C. v. Anderson

837 So. 2d 425, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13444, 2002 WL 31060535

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 2002 | Docket: 64820702

Published

Rules of Criminal Procedure were adopted in 1968, Rule 3.700 was included as a rewrite of section 921.05,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Watson v. State

820 So. 2d 1057, 2002 WL 1466553

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2002 | Docket: 1362281

Published

The trial court ultimately denied the motion. Rule 3.700(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires

Category: Criminal Procedure

Salters v. State

802 So. 2d 501, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18281, 2001 WL 1643847

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2001 | Docket: 64811039

Published

KLEIN, J. Rule 3.700(c)(1) requires that, when a sentence is being imposed by a judge other than the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dailey v. State

791 So. 2d 586, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11455, 2001 WL 912752

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2001 | Docket: 64807414

Published

year minimum mandatory sentence for count 2. Rule 3.700(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wilson v. State

773 So. 2d 113, 2000 WL 1854000

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2000 | Docket: 1687575

Published

the defendant," that is, the sentence, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700, does not occur until the pronouncement is

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850

779 So. 2d 1290, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 906, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2271, 2000 WL 1535283

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2000 | Docket: 64804300

Published

Statutes. See § 948.01(2), Fla. Stat. (1999);2 Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(a)(“The term sentence means the pronouncement

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.670 & 3.700(b)

760 So. 2d 67, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 527, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 1988, 1999 WL 1029286

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1999 | Docket: 64797895

Published

hand-delivered copy. RULE 3.700(b) Next, we turn to the proposed amendment to rule 3.700(b), Pronouncement

Category: Criminal Procedure

Adams v. State

739 So. 2d 602, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8383, 1997 WL 408316

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1997 | Docket: 64790276

Published

not render a judge unavailable for purposes of rule 3.700. In my view, declining to preside over a resentenc-ing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Confere v. State

691 So. 2d 647, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3998, 1997 WL 186462

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1997 | Docket: 64772486

Published

must be orally pronounced at sentencing. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(b); Justice v. State, 674 So.2d 123 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Justice v. State

674 So. 2d 123, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 219, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 1009

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 23, 1996 | Docket: 64764918

Published

2d DCA 1992). Application of the dictates of rule 3.700 to conditions of probation is consistent with

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sprankle v. State

677 So. 2d 307, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2232, 1996 WL 100795

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1996 | Docket: 64766301

Published

case shall be pronounced in open court.” Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.700(b). See also Armstead v. State, 612 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.170 & 3.700

633 So. 2d 1056, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 126, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 354, 1994 WL 70436

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1994 | Docket: 64747006

Published

decision in McCoy. The proposed amendment to rule 3.700 is also in response to a request by this Court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Haggerty v. State

566 So. 2d 825, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6360, 1990 WL 121405

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 1990 | Docket: 64652928

Published

court held that a trial court had complied with rule 3.700(c), Florida Rules Criminal Procedure, by taking

Category: Criminal Procedure

Massard v. State

540 So. 2d 939, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 913, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1909, 1989 WL 33949

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1989 | Docket: 64641398

Published

resentencing: 1. The trial court shall comply with rule 3.700(c) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure;

Category: Criminal Procedure

Massard v. State

540 So. 2d 939, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 913, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1909, 1989 WL 33949

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1989 | Docket: 64641398

Published

resentencing: 1. The trial court shall comply with rule 3.700(c) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure;

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mobley v. State

407 So. 2d 1037, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22114

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1981 | Docket: 64587088

Published

The Lawley decision emphasized the fact that Rule 3.700(c) provides for sentencing by a judge other than

Category: Criminal Procedure

Noyola v. State

407 So. 2d 353, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21907

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1981 | Docket: 64586787

Published

Procedure, 196 So.2d 124 at 171 (Fla.1967); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700, 3.790(a)(b). BOARDMAN, A. C. J., and RYDER

Category: Criminal Procedure

Birdsall v. State

350 So. 2d 798, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16456

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1977 | Docket: 64560575

Published

provided the provisions of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700(c) are complied with. Rule 3.700(c) provides that the sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

McCoy v. State

344 So. 2d 250, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15603

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1977 | Docket: 64557947

Published

that Judge Swigert failed to comply with Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700(c) which provides: “In those cases where

Category: Criminal Procedure