Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.575
RULE 3.575. MOTION TO INTERVIEW JUROR
A party who has reason to believe that the verdict may be
subject to legal challenge may move the court for an order
permitting an interview of a juror or jurors to so determine. The
motion shall be filed within 10 days after the rendition of the
verdict, unless good cause is shown for the failure to make the
motion within that time. The motion shall state the name of any
juror to be interviewed and the reasons that the party has to believe
that the verdict may be subject to challenge. After notice and
hearing, the trial judge, upon a finding that the verdict may be
subject to challenge, shall enter an order permitting the interview,
and setting therein a time and a place for the interview of the juror
or jurors, which shall be conducted in the presence of the court and
the parties. If no reason is found to believe that the verdict may be
subject to challenge, the court shall enter its order denying
permission to interview.
Court Commentary
2004 Amendment. This rule does not abrogate Rule
Regulating The Florida Bar 4-3.5(d)(4), which allows an attorney to
interview a juror to determine whether the verdict may be subject to
legal challenge after filing a notice of intention to interview.
XII. POST-TRIAL MOTIONS
Cases Citing Rule 3.575
Total Results: 21
985 So. 2d 510, 2008 WL 731602
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2008 | Docket: 1253596
Cited 47 times | Published
counsel a reasonable time before the interview.
Rule 3.575, which became effective in January 2005, establishes
Category: Criminal Procedure
63 So. 3d 730, 2011 WL 1045339
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2011 | Docket: 60301162
Cited 21 times | Published
not abuse its discretion in denying Johnston’s rule 3.575 motion because a juror interview was unnecessary
Category: Criminal Procedure
971 So. 2d 106, 2007 WL 3101754
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2007 | Docket: 1731793
Cited 17 times | Published
decisions which have found that rule 4-3.5(d)(4) and rule 3.575, which collectively restrict an attorney's ability
Category: Criminal Procedure
132 So. 3d 40, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 756, 2013 WL 5659482, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2287
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2013 | Docket: 60238469
Cited 7 times | Published
(noting that the Court has held that neither rule 3.575 nor rule 4-3.5 violates a defendant’s constitutional
Category: Criminal Procedure
103 So. 3d 98, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 499, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2649, 2012 WL 6621371
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2012 | Docket: 60227276
Cited 7 times | Published
failure to make the motion within that time.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.575.
. Upon being taken into custody for questioning
Category: Criminal Procedure
963 So. 2d 831, 2007 WL 2254515
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2007 | Docket: 1697400
Cited 7 times | Published
hearing in the June 2005 trial in the instant case. Rule 3.575 states:
A party who has reason to believe that
Category: Criminal Procedure
922 So. 2d 386, 2006 WL 536609
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 2006 | Docket: 2578110
Cited 7 times | Published
after filing a notice of intention to interview."
Rule 3.575 regulates juror interviews but does not preclude
Category: Criminal Procedure
78 So. 3d 1025, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 593, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 2449, 2011 WL 4835656
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2011 | Docket: 60304967
Cited 6 times | Published
decisions which have found that rule 4-3.5(d)(4) and rule 3.575, which collectively restrict an attorney’s ability
Category: Criminal Procedure
72 So. 3d 336, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16976, 2011 WL 5061238
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 2011 | Docket: 60303258
Cited 2 times | Published
P. 8.575. Disparity from previous case law, Rule 3.575 does not require the filing of sworn affidavits
Category: Criminal Procedure
91 So. 3d 125, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 125, 2012 WL 489231, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 337
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2012 | Docket: 60309804
Cited 1 times | Published
challenge [to the verdict] may exist”); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.575 (requiring a party to file with the trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
9 So. 3d 665, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2718, 2009 WL 886158
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2009 | Docket: 1221411
Cited 1 times | Published
counsel acknowledged the 10-day time limit under Rule 3.575. The state objected to the motion as untimely
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2024 | Docket: 69306035
Published
cause for the delay, his claim is time-
barred. Rule 3.575 requires that a motion seeking to interview a
Category: Criminal Procedure
260 So. 3d 1181
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 2018 | Docket: 64699968
Published
twenty years in prison. This appeal follows.
Rule 3.575 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure allows
Category: Criminal Procedure
260 So. 3d 1181
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 2018 | Docket: 64699967
Published
twenty years in prison. This appeal follows.
Rule 3.575 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure allows
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2018 | Docket: 8409771
Published
a verdict may be subject to challenge. Fla. R. Crim. P.
3.575. However, “Florida’s Evidence Code . .
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2018 | Docket: 7510525
Published
motion as untimely without
good cause. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.575 (requiring a motion to
interview a juror
Category: Criminal Procedure
227 So. 3d 194, 2017 WL 2304663, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7647
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2017 | Docket: 6066413
Published
Anderson v. State, 18 So.3d 501, 509 (Fla. 2009)). Rule 3.575 states as follows:
A party who has reason
Category: Criminal Procedure
198 So. 3d 789, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3368, 2016 WL 833964
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2016 | Docket: 3041727
Published
was specifically made aware of the existence of Rule 3.575 regarding juror interviews. The Court is of the
Category: Criminal Procedure
186 So. 3d 598, 2016 WL 742601
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2016 | Docket: 3045496
Published
1
.
See
Fla. R.Crim.' P. 3.575 ("A party who has reason to believe' that
Category: Criminal Procedure
39 So. 3d 343, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7322, 2010 WL 2077168
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2010 | Docket: 60294866
Published
(explaining the dichotomy between Rule 4-3.5(d)(4) and Rule 3.575). An attorney who interviews a juror regarding
Category: Criminal Procedure
886 So. 2d 197, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 568, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 1746, 2004 WL 2248209
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2004 | Docket: 64834033
Published
Sentence). The Rules Committee also proposes new rule 3.575 (Motion to Interview Juror) and a new form order
Category: Criminal Procedure