Cases Citing Rule 3.410
Total Results: 139
365 So. 2d 701
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1978 | Docket: 2054128
Cited 254 times | Published
court that the argument lacks merit.
[5] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410.
[6] We recognized and reaffirmed this principle
Category: Criminal Procedure
272 So. 2d 65
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1973 | Docket: 1755077
Cited 102 times | Published
Committee Note: This is the same as former Fla.Rule 3.410, except that the former rule made it mandatory
Category: Criminal Procedure
510 So. 2d 885, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 325
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1987 | Docket: 1593209
Cited 76 times | Published
any testimony read to them" within the terms of rule 3.410. Further, and most significantly, even if we
Category: Criminal Procedure
733 F.2d 766, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22435
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 16, 1984 | Docket: 434209
Cited 53 times | Published
morning, the judge ensured compliance with Florida Rule 3.410 (to the extent it may apply), which provides:
Category: Criminal Procedure
547 So. 2d 111, 1989 WL 77504
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1989 | Docket: 1738696
Cited 40 times | Published
opportunity to respond when court reconvened. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410; Roberts v. State, 510 So.2d 885, 891 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
395 So. 2d 1175
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1981 | Docket: 1318125
Cited 40 times | Published
close range.
[2] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.420.
[3] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410.
[4] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.430.
Category: Criminal Procedure
700 So. 2d 670, 1997 WL 633315
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1997 | Docket: 1373107
Cited 38 times | Published
attorney and to counsel for defendant. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410. See Hitchcock v. State, 413 So.2d 741,
Category: Criminal Procedure
488 So. 2d 62, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 199
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1986 | Docket: 1287184
Cited 35 times | Published
directs the material to be taken and may be heard. Rule 3.410 is more explicit. It provides that if the jury
Category: Criminal Procedure
336 So. 2d 65
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1976 | Docket: 2521736
Cited 30 times | Published
370 Rule 3.380 Rule 3.390
Rule 3.400 Rule 3.410 Rule 3.420
Rule 3.430 Rule 3.440 Rule
Category: Criminal Procedure
645 So. 2d 965, 1994 WL 570629
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1994 | Docket: 107661
Cited 26 times | Published
other request to have testimony reread. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410.
The more difficult issue which is presented
Category: Criminal Procedure
531 So. 2d 124, 1988 WL 93704
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 1988 | Docket: 2517910
Cited 26 times | Published
attorney and to counsel for the defendant.
Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410. The question the jury asked was within the
Category: Criminal Procedure
480 So. 2d 1277, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 533
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1985 | Docket: 1667454
Cited 25 times | Published
fails to show compliance with the procedure of rule 3.410.[2] The district court resolved this silence
Category: Criminal Procedure
731 So. 2d 1243, 1999 WL 80411
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1999 | Docket: 1408841
Cited 23 times | Published
query is within the trial court's discretion:
Rule 3.410. Jury Request to Review Evidence or for Additional
Category: Criminal Procedure
359 So. 2d 864
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1978 | Docket: 1735694
Cited 23 times | Published
discretion of the trial judge. See Committee Note, Rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; United
Category: Criminal Procedure
538 So. 2d 833, 1989 WL 9191
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 1989 | Docket: 372270
Cited 22 times | Published
defense. This Court has held that violations of rule 3.410 are per se reversible because communication between
Category: Criminal Procedure
73 So. 3d 155, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 517, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 2255, 2011 WL 4389009
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2011 | Docket: 2355336
Cited 20 times | Published
State, 731 So.2d 1243, 1246 (Fla.1999)); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410. “Discretion is abused only when the judicial
Category: Criminal Procedure
34 So. 3d 819, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7330, 2010 WL 2077164
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2010 | Docket: 1131165
Cited 20 times | Published
counsel for the defendant.
(i) Notice under Rule 3.410
Appellant's argument that the trial court's failure
Category: Criminal Procedure
799 So. 2d 997, 2001 WL 987233
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2001 | Docket: 1681684
Cited 20 times | Published
juror outside the express notice requirements of rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, a harmless
Category: Criminal Procedure
513 So. 2d 112, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 487
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1987 | Docket: 1295029
Cited 19 times | Published
requirements of rule 3.410 should be analyzed using harmless error principles. Id.
Rule 3.410 requires:
After
Category: Criminal Procedure
511 So. 2d 575, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 986
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1987 | Docket: 1700742
Cited 17 times | Published
some of the testimony.
The state points out that rule 3.410, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure, leaves reinstruction
Category: Criminal Procedure
361 So. 2d 776
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1978 | Docket: 1288417
Cited 16 times | Published
harmful error, appears to have been based upon Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410. Said rule requires the presence of opposing
Category: Criminal Procedure
907 So. 2d 489, 2005 WL 977018
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2005 | Docket: 459529
Cited 15 times | Published
refusing to answer a jury's question. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410 (providing that if the jury requests additional
Category: Criminal Procedure
730 So. 2d 667, 1998 WL 558881
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1998 | Docket: 1755377
Cited 15 times | Published
court violated Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.410[1] and that such a violation was per se reversible
Category: Criminal Procedure
620 So. 2d 1006, 1993 WL 209167
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1993 | Docket: 1388049
Cited 15 times | Published
the presence of counsel was enough to satisfy rule 3.410. In rejecting this argument, we noted that "[t]he
Category: Criminal Procedure
487 So. 2d 1058, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 195
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1986 | Docket: 1796280
Cited 15 times | Published
notification of counsel was sufficient under rule 3.410 and that no violation of the rule occurred. We
Category: Criminal Procedure
48 So. 3d 777, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 651, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1935, 2010 WL 4483506
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2010 | Docket: 2396375
Cited 14 times | Published
731 So.2d 1243, 1246 (Fla.1999) (citing Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410).
During deliberations, the jury asked whether
Category: Criminal Procedure
781 So. 2d 413, 2001 WL 38092
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2001 | Docket: 1690449
Cited 11 times | Published
attorney and to counsel for the defendant.
Fla.R.Crim P. 3.410. Under this rule, the trial court has wide
Category: Criminal Procedure
502 So. 2d 473, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 310
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1987 | Docket: 1180944
Cited 11 times | Published
jury.
There is no civil counterpart to criminal Rule 3.410. The parties are in agreement that there are
Category: Criminal Procedure
605 So. 2d 492, 1992 WL 212033
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 1992 | Docket: 468456
Cited 10 times | Published
testimony of two *495 witnesses read back to them. Rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure states,
Category: Criminal Procedure
606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1992 | Docket: 2191048
Cited 9 times | Published
1972 Amendment. Same as former Rrule 3.390.
RULE 3.410. JURY REQUEST TO REVIEW EVIDENCE OR FOR ADDITIONAL
Category: Criminal Procedure
569 So. 2d 433, 1990 WL 165309
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1990 | Docket: 1190038
Cited 9 times | Published
trial judge to respond to a request covered under rule 3.410 without counsel being present and having the
Category: Criminal Procedure
360 So. 2d 474
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 1978 | Docket: 1474241
Cited 8 times | Published
and returned a verdict of guilty.
Under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410,[1] it is within the trial court's discretion
Category: Criminal Procedure
91 So. 3d 836, 2012 WL 1947879
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2012 | Docket: 60309987
Cited 7 times | Published
trial court never stated that it would disobey rule 3.410 and deny a read-back if requested. Id. The Third
Category: Criminal Procedure
831 So. 2d 156, 2002 WL 31386764
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2002 | Docket: 1722789
Cited 7 times | Published
State, 351 So.2d 26 (Fla.1977), a violation of rule 3.410 must ordinarily be treated as per se reversible
Category: Criminal Procedure
377 So. 2d 212
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1979 | Docket: 423654
Cited 7 times | Published
the Florida Supreme Court was construing Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.410 which is concerned with oral requests for
Category: Criminal Procedure
296 So. 2d 614
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 1974 | Docket: 1617122
Cited 7 times | Published
of previously given instructions, governed by Rule 3:410 RCrP, 33 F.S.A.
We fail to see how the State
Category: Criminal Procedure
27 So. 3d 211, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1380, 2010 WL 445388
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2010 | Docket: 1665006
Cited 6 times | Published
prosecuting attorney and to counsel for the defendant.
Rule 3.410 gives a trial judge "wide latitude in the area
Category: Criminal Procedure
990 So. 2d 1162, 2008 WL 4146369
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 2008 | Docket: 1388227
Cited 6 times | Published
161, 163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410.
Third, Smith argues that the trial court
Category: Criminal Procedure
608 So. 2d 533, 1992 WL 332663
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1992 | Docket: 1732460
Cited 6 times | Published
similar to Huhn).
The state argues, of course, that Rule 3.410 is absolutely discretionary and that, therefore
Category: Criminal Procedure
439 So. 2d 288
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1983 | Docket: 1265524
Cited 6 times | Published
discretion. Here it was not.
NOTES
[1] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410 and Committee Note state:
After the jurors
Category: Criminal Procedure
122 So. 3d 302, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 618, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1894, 2013 WL 4734573
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2013 | Docket: 60234661
Cited 5 times | Published
State v. Barrow, 91 So.3d 826 (Fla. 2012); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410.
This instruction was adopted in 2007 [967
Category: Criminal Procedure
46 So. 3d 1028, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13428, 2010 WL 3515553
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 2010 | Docket: 60296104
Cited 5 times | Published
Defense counsel quite properly said that under rule 3.410, a jury may request to have “testimony read to
Category: Criminal Procedure
638 So. 2d 966, 1994 WL 203006
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1994 | Docket: 1168469
Cited 5 times | Published
evidence where no notice has been given under rule 3.410.
Id. at 715 (emphasis added). Although Vileenor
Category: Criminal Procedure
618 So. 2d 171, 1993 WL 83088
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1993 | Docket: 1720292
Cited 5 times | Published
jury constituted per se reversible error under rule 3.410. Williams, 488 So.2d at 64. In Williams we reaffirmed
Category: Criminal Procedure
610 So. 2d 1329, 1992 WL 379896
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1992 | Docket: 1413148
Cited 5 times | Published
that the trial court's failure to comply with rule 3.410 governing jury questions is per se reversible
Category: Criminal Procedure
573 So. 2d 161, 1990 WL 177655
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1990 | Docket: 479326
Cited 5 times | Published
GARRETT, Judge, dissenting.
I respectfully dissent. Rule 3.410 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provides:
Category: Criminal Procedure
500 So. 2d 713, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 202
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1987 | Docket: 1689376
Cited 5 times | Published
outside of the express notice requirements of rule 3.410. Citing Hitchcock, the court declared that communications
Category: Criminal Procedure
453 So. 2d 505
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1984 | Docket: 1651281
Cited 5 times | Published
is absent during proceedings contemplated by Rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which provides:
Category: Criminal Procedure
708 So. 2d 647, 1998 WL 150687
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1998 | Docket: 1528321
Cited 4 times | Published
correct that the claim was waived. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410. However, more importantly, there was no
Category: Criminal Procedure
655 So. 2d 1277, 1995 WL 334348
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1995 | Docket: 1696827
Cited 4 times | Published
what occurred in this case directly violated rule 3.410 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure which
Category: Criminal Procedure
449 So. 2d 966
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 1984 | Docket: 423383
Cited 4 times | Published
and Ivory v. State, 351 So.2d 26 (Fla. 1977). Rule 3.410 provides as follows:
After the jurors have retired
Category: Criminal Procedure
442 So. 2d 432
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1983 | Docket: 469151
Cited 4 times | Published
However, this case does not involve a violation of rule 3.410. The jury did not request additional instructions
Category: Criminal Procedure
431 So. 2d 328
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1983 | Docket: 208616
Cited 4 times | Published
(Fla. 1977), which involved a violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410, is inapplicable. For this reason, we need
Category: Criminal Procedure
340 So. 2d 490
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1976 | Docket: 1709092
Cited 4 times | Published
defendant's counsel and the prosecution. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410. No one is permitted to communicate with
Category: Criminal Procedure
330 So. 2d 853
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 1976 | Docket: 1774659
Cited 4 times | Published
which was not in evidence.
It is provided in Rule 3.410, RCrP, entitled "Jury Request to Review Evidence
Category: Criminal Procedure
23 So. 3d 857, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19625, 2009 WL 4824791
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2009 | Docket: 983525
Cited 3 times | Published
request that testimony be read. The rule states:
Rule 3.410. Jury Request to Review Evidence or for Additional
Category: Criminal Procedure
760 So. 2d 977, 2000 WL 628262
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 2000 | Docket: 1695286
Cited 3 times | Published
allow the court to read back testimony. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410. This preemptive instruction by the trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
730 So. 2d 734, 1999 WL 110758
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1999 | Docket: 1755403
Cited 3 times | Published
second time in open court upon request pursuant to rule 3.410.
Id. at 967-68.
We believe that the same rationale
Category: Criminal Procedure
712 So. 2d 837, 1998 WL 374722
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1998 | Docket: 1471795
Cited 3 times | Published
610 So.2d 1283, 1286 (Fla. 1992); see also Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.410.
However, the State identified a potential
Category: Criminal Procedure
567 So. 2d 18, 1990 WL 129929
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1990 | Docket: 1380349
Cited 3 times | Published
well have been technically ill-advised, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410, it cannot result in reversal in the absence
Category: Criminal Procedure
497 So. 2d 281
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1986 | Docket: 1689775
Cited 3 times | Published
attorney or counsel for defendant as required by rule 3.410. The judge responded by appending to the bottom
Category: Criminal Procedure
492 So. 2d 1072, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 441
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 1986 | Docket: 478219
Cited 3 times | Published
Ivory v. State, 351 So.2d 26 (Fla. 1977), nor rule 3.410 requires the defendant's presence when the judge
Category: Criminal Procedure
733 F.2d 766
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 16, 1984 | Docket: 66197297
Cited 3 times | Published
morning, the judge ensured compliance with Florida Rule 3.410 (to the extent it may apply), which provides:
Category: Criminal Procedure
122 So. 3d 976, 2013 WL 5576095, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16224
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2013 | Docket: 60234832
Cited 2 times | Published
Rules of Criminal Procedure and was superseded by rule 3.410. The legislature removed the mandatory language
Category: Criminal Procedure
816 So. 2d 182, 2002 WL 825954
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 2002 | Docket: 1753338
Cited 2 times | Published
Characterizing this as a violation of Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410, the appellant maintains that it is per
Category: Criminal Procedure
793 So. 2d 119, 2001 WL 936163
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2001 | Docket: 1677969
Cited 2 times | Published
to counsel for the defendant.
A violation of rule 3.410 is ordinarily per se reversible error. In Ivory
Category: Criminal Procedure
739 So. 2d 1197, 1999 WL 550651
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1999 | Docket: 1688670
Cited 2 times | Published
(Fla.1998), the supreme court decided that a rule 3.410 violation was not reversible error where defense
Category: Criminal Procedure
732 So. 2d 3, 1999 WL 163998
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 1999 | Docket: 460382
Cited 2 times | Published
Florida Supreme Court held that a violation of rule 3.410 is a per se reversible error. Even when there
Category: Criminal Procedure
663 So. 2d 1337, 1994 WL 655677
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1994 | Docket: 1313768
Cited 2 times | Published
Florida and this court have expanded the scope of rule 3.410 to encompass not only requests concerning instructions
Category: Criminal Procedure
624 So. 2d 300, 1993 WL 320983
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1993 | Docket: 475533
Cited 2 times | Published
request to have certain testimony read to them. Rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, gives the
Category: Criminal Procedure
596 So. 2d 1148, 1992 WL 55228
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1992 | Docket: 1385605
Cited 2 times | Published
requested that I respond and your objection is noted.
Rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (1991) reads:
Category: Criminal Procedure
471 So. 2d 1336, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1574
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1985 | Docket: 1397309
Cited 2 times | Published
Rose together, we conclude that violations of rule 3.410 are subject to the harmless error rule.[5] Other
Category: Criminal Procedure
448 So. 2d 529
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1984 | Docket: 429309
Cited 2 times | Published
tape recorded jury instructions to the jury, rule 3.410 provides:
[A]nd the court may give them such
Category: Criminal Procedure
348 So. 2d 634
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1977 | Docket: 1761094
Cited 2 times | Published
State, 336 So.2d 673 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410.
While counsel for the State concedes that
Category: Criminal Procedure
252 So. 3d 368
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2018 | Docket: 7567938
Cited 1 times | Published
triggering the procedure in
subdivision (a) of rule 3.410. As the Florida Supreme Court noted in Hazuri
Category: Criminal Procedure
161 So. 3d 314, 2014 WL 5026410
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2014 | Docket: 1437945
Cited 1 times | Published
of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.410. Rule 3.410 establishes a procedure for trial courts to follow
Category: Criminal Procedure
132 So. 3d 267, 2014 WL 52659, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 140
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2014 | Docket: 60238397
Cited 1 times | Published
State, 122 So.3d 976, 979 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). Rule 3.410 imparts upon trial courts “wide latitude in the
Category: Criminal Procedure
995 So. 2d 1029, 2008 WL 4756397
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 2008 | Docket: 1685081
Cited 1 times | Published
discretion in responding to jury questions, Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410, and the court here could have defined the
Category: Criminal Procedure
802 So. 2d 1161, 2001 WL 1485725
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 2001 | Docket: 1698726
Cited 1 times | Published
1977), the supreme court held that a violation of rule 3.410 is a per se reversible error. Even when there
Category: Criminal Procedure
778 So. 2d 1017, 2000 WL 1854073
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2000 | Docket: 1290271
Cited 1 times | Published
suggests would have answered the jury question. Rule 3.410 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure permits
Category: Criminal Procedure
760 So. 2d 278, 2000 WL 726357
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2000 | Docket: 1695137
Cited 1 times | Published
responded to the jury's request outside his presence. Rule 3.410 provides,
After the jurors have retired to consider
Category: Criminal Procedure
697 So. 2d 571, 1997 WL 423437
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1997 | Docket: 1776617
Cited 1 times | Published
should not be honored.... The particular evil rule 3.410 and the per se error standard of Ivory were designed
Category: Criminal Procedure
570 So. 2d 1133, 1990 WL 198378
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1990 | Docket: 1349231
Cited 1 times | Published
necessary parties were present pursuant to Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.410. We find no merit in appellant's contention
Category: Criminal Procedure
348 So. 2d 602
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1977 | Docket: 1760490
Cited 1 times | Published
the jury returned its verdict against Flowers.
Rule 3.410 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure provides:
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2025 | Docket: 69266233
Published
730 So. 2d 667, 668 (Fla. 1998) (holding
that a rule 3.410 violation is reversible error but must be preserved
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2024 | Docket: 69266233
Published
730 So. 2d 667, 668 (Fla. 1998) (holding
that a rule 3.410 violation is reversible error but must be preserved
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2024 | Docket: 69265738
Published
constitute a "formal defect" under rule 3.410. Cf. Snipes v. State, 733 So.
2d 1000, 1005 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2024 | Docket: 69159099
Published
procedures set forth in subdivision (a).
Fla. R. Crim P. 3.410 (2021) (emphasis added).
According
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 2022 | Docket: 64983999
Published
judge responds to a jury request covered
under rule 3.410 outside the presence of counsel, the State and
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 2019 | Docket: 16280859
Published
1. Playing Back Testimony in Violation of Rule 3.410(a)
On the defendant’s first argument, the
Category: Criminal Procedure
212 So. 3d 507, 2017 WL 897431, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2999
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 2017 | Docket: 4619348
Published
in part on the ground that the court violated Rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, with regard
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2016 | Docket: 3037339
Published
the
procedure for taking depositions.
Rule 3.410 (Jury Request to Review Evidence or for Additional
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2016 | Docket: 3029854
Published
the
procedure for taking depositions.
Rule 3.410 (Jury Request to Review Evidence or for Additional
Category: Criminal Procedure
188 So. 3d 764, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 594, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2949, 2015 WL 10490032
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2015 | Docket: 3008264
Published
to the procedure for taking depositions.
Rule 3.410 (Jury Request to Review Evidence or for Additional
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2015 | Docket: 2646457
Published
not comprise
communication within the scope of rule 3.410, and therefore do not constitute
error.3 Whitton’s
Category: Criminal Procedure
109 So. 3d 890, 2013 WL 1222940, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4911
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2013 | Docket: 60229862
Published
second time in open court upon request pursuant to Rule 3.410).
Category: Criminal Procedure
104 So. 3d 304, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 678, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2667, 2012 WL 5439265
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2012 | Docket: 60227454
Published
court or clerk issue subpoenas.
The amendments to rule 3.410 (Jury Request to Review Evidence or for Additional
Category: Criminal Procedure
104 So. 3d 304, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 678, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2667, 2012 WL 5439265
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2012 | Docket: 60227454
Published
court or clerk issue subpoenas.
The amendments to rule 3.410 (Jury Request to Review Evidence or for Additional
Category: Criminal Procedure
91 So. 3d 826, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 387, 2012 WL 1947880, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 1064
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2012 | Docket: 60309986
Published
“effectively negat[ed] an option allowed the jury under Rule 3.410.” Id. (quoting Roper, 608 So.2d at 535). The
Category: Criminal Procedure
59 So. 3d 272, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5203, 2011 WL 1376506
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2011 | Docket: 60299663
Published
trial court’s discretion.”); Fla. R. Crim. P. Rule 3.410 (2007) (“After the jurors have retired to consider
Category: Criminal Procedure
31 So. 3d 816, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 42, 2010 WL 45860
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2010 | Docket: 1149233
Published
attorney *818 and to counsel for the defendant.
Rule 3.410 does not require that the defendant be present
Category: Criminal Procedure
957 So. 2d 104, 2007 WL 1426726
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2007 | Docket: 1269951
Published
Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.410. Id. at 1246. Rule 3.410 provides:
After the jurors have retired to consider
Category: Criminal Procedure
937 So. 2d 1220, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15489, 2006 WL 2683639
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2006 | Docket: 64846889
Published
Ct. *1221101, 142 L.Ed.2d 81 (1998); cf. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410, 3.420.
Category: Criminal Procedure
791 So. 2d 586, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11455, 2001 WL 912752
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2001 | Docket: 64807414
Published
significantly, this is not a situation governed by rule 3.410. Even if the issue had been preserved, defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
785 So. 2d 526, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16898, 2000 WL 1872552
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2000 | Docket: 64805428
Published
two paragraphs which follow the quotation from Rule 3.410 recite what the defendant’s claims are. See opinion
Category: Criminal Procedure
768 So. 2d 14, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8992, 2000 WL 986167
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 2000 | Docket: 64800670
Published
defendant contended that the note implicated Rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Because
Category: Criminal Procedure
763 So. 2d 1237, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6881, 2000 WL 725302
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2000 | Docket: 64799251
Published
not in evidence was a communication covered by Rule 3.410 and that the trial judge’s failure to consult
Category: Criminal Procedure
754 So. 2d 822, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3956
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2000 | Docket: 64796328
Published
defendant contended that the jury note implicated Rule 3.410, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure. Because
Category: Criminal Procedure
743 So. 2d 1141, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13175, 1999 WL 790717
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 1999 | Docket: 64791902
Published
response to a question posed by the jury. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410.
After attempting to steal some film from
Category: Criminal Procedure
768 So. 2d 464, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1299, 1999 WL 68529
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1999 | Docket: 64800747
Published
verdict. The defendant bases his argument on Rule 3.410, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure, which provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
726 So. 2d 340, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 481, 1999 WL 22318
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1999 | Docket: 64786231
Published
trial court to instruct a jury in violation of Rule 3.410. Here, the jury received an improper instruction
Category: Criminal Procedure
722 So. 2d 980, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 89, 1999 WL 4902
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1999 | Docket: 64785022
Published
660 So.2d 1038, 1046 n. 1 (Fla.1995); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410.
GRIFFIN, C.J., and HARRIS and THOMPSON
Category: Criminal Procedure
712 So. 2d 1184, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7180, 1998 WL 314592
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1998 | Docket: 64781593
Published
to counsel for the defendant,” as required by Rule 3.410, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure. We reverse
Category: Criminal Procedure
707 So. 2d 1151, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1356, 1998 WL 65390
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1998 | Docket: 64779775
Published
we cannot agree.
The controlling rule, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410, provides only that “[a]fter the jurors have
Category: Criminal Procedure
700 So. 2d 734, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10880, 1997 WL 594113
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1997 | Docket: 64776311
Published
Crim. Pro. 3.410. Although such a violation of rule 3.410 would ordinarily *735constitute per se reversible
Category: Criminal Procedure
694 So. 2d 161, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6136, 1997 WL 295171
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1997 | Docket: 64773900
Published
to them during their deliberations. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410; Miller v. State, 605 So.2d 492, 494-95
Category: Criminal Procedure
638 So. 2d 569, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4940, 1994 WL 201393
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1994 | Docket: 64749194
Published
during the jury’s deliberations. Although Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410 requires that the trial judge give such requested
Category: Criminal Procedure
634 So. 2d 767, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3045, 1994 WL 106235
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1994 | Docket: 64747416
Published
consider that the situation at bar is controlled by rule 3.410, and supreme court case law which holds that
Category: Criminal Procedure
611 So. 2d 13, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12862, 1992 WL 379814
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1992 | Docket: 64693119
Published
Ivory v. State, 351 So.2d 26 (Fla.1977); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410.
*15In view of the above we do not address
Category: Criminal Procedure
596 So. 2d 787, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4044, 1992 WL 69000
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1992 | Docket: 64666549
Published
prosecuting attorney and to counsel for the defendant.
Rule 3.410, Fla.R.Crim.P.
Here, the trial court answered
Category: Criminal Procedure
590 So. 2d 476, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11921, 1991 WL 253372
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1991 | Docket: 64663719
Published
held that a violation of Rule 3.410 is per se reversible error. Rule 3.410 provides:
After the jurors
Category: Criminal Procedure
585 So. 2d 944, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7799, 1991 WL 150415
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 1991 | Docket: 64661556
Published
within the scope of Rule 3.410. The supreme court has held that any violation of Rule 3.410 is per se reversible
Category: Criminal Procedure
572 So. 2d 521, 1990 WL 178649
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 1991 | Docket: 479583
Published
heard regarding the appropriate response. See Rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; Curtis
Category: Criminal Procedure
557 So. 2d 104, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 693, 1990 WL 8642
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1990 | Docket: 64648410
Published
response to a jury request for reinstruction under rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, but merely
Category: Criminal Procedure
528 So. 2d 998, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1816, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3477, 1988 WL 79322
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 1988 | Docket: 64636155
Published
merit in Whitcraft’s contentions and affirm. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410, 3.420; see Spence v. State, 515 So.2d 312
Category: Criminal Procedure
522 So. 2d 436, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 672, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 985, 1988 WL 20079
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1988 | Docket: 64633661
Published
(Fla.1977), the supreme court in considering rule 3.410 held that it is prejudicial error for a trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
513 So. 2d 779, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2395, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12284
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1987 | Docket: 64629988
Published
the jury an instruction without complying with rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The judgment
Category: Criminal Procedure
512 So. 2d 1159, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2343, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10416
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 1987 | Docket: 64629662
Published
State, 338 So.2d 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410.
Affirmed.
. Cf. Dudley v. State, 405 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
506 So. 2d 55, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1110, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7880
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1987 | Docket: 64626706
Published
per se error cases involves violations of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410 which arise when the jurors “request additional
Category: Criminal Procedure
506 So. 2d 55, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1110, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7880
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1987 | Docket: 64626706
Published
per se error cases involves violations of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410 which arise when the jurors “request additional
Category: Criminal Procedure
504 So. 2d 1311, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 722, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7133
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1987 | Docket: 64626209
Published
question was not a type of request falling within rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and (2)
Category: Criminal Procedure
487 So. 2d 304, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 339, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6275
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1986 | Docket: 64618832
Published
“additional instruction,” within the meaning of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410, is per se reversible error where such instruction
Category: Criminal Procedure
474 So. 2d 340, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 126, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14736
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1985 | Docket: 64613699
Published
Although Ivory involved a clear violation of Rule 3.410, this case does not. In Ivory, the trial judge
Category: Criminal Procedure
468 So. 2d 335, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 967, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13462
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1985 | Docket: 64611738
Published
communication within the terms of the prohibition in Rule 3.410 against giving “additional instructions” without
Category: Criminal Procedure
455 So. 2d 1090, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1954, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14962
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1984 | Docket: 64606804
Published
was given. Technically Rose does not involve rule 3.410 because the jury did not “request additional
Category: Criminal Procedure
404 So. 2d 861, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21274
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1981 | Docket: 64585533
Published
returned to the jury room, he did not raise the Rule 3.410 objection which is raised on appeal. Point I
Category: Criminal Procedure
385 So. 2d 149, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17025
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1980 | Docket: 64576889
Published
Procedure for jury reinstruction is governed by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410:
After the jurors have retired to consider
Category: Criminal Procedure
349 So. 2d 713, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16271
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 1977 | Docket: 64560044
Published
this colloquy constituted a violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410 (requiring additional instructions to the
Category: Criminal Procedure
303 So. 2d 68, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8256
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 1974 | Docket: 64542482
Published
sufficient and that the court is given discretion by rule 3.410, Cr'PR, as to the matter of rereading testimony
Category: Criminal Procedure