Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.410 - JURY REQUEST TO REVIEW EVIDENCE OR FOR | Syfert Law

Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.410

RULE 3.410. JURY REQUEST TO REVIEW EVIDENCE OR FOR
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS


(a) If, after they have retired to consider their verdict, jurors
request additional instructions or to have any testimony read or
played back to them they may be conducted into the courtroom by
the officer who has them in charge and the court may give them the
additional instructions or may order the testimony read or played
back to them. The instructions shall be given and the testimony
presented only after notice to the prosecuting attorney and to
counsel for the defendant. All testimony read or played back must
be done in open court in the presence of all parties. In its
discretion, the court may respond in writing to the inquiry without
having the jury brought before the court, provided the parties have
received the opportunity to place objections on the record and both
the inquiry and response are made part of the record.

(b) In a case in which the jury requests to have the
transcripts of trial testimony, the following procedures must be
followed:
(1) The trial judge must deny the requests for
transcripts.

(2) The trial judge must instruct jurors that they can,
however, request to have any testimony read or played back, which
may or may not be granted at the court’s discretion.

(3) In cases in which jurors make only a general
request for transcripts, as opposed to identifying any particular
witness’ testimony that they wish to review, the trial judge must
instruct jurors that, if they request a read or play back, they must
specify the particular trial testimony they wish to have read or
played back.

(c) If, after being properly instructed in accordance with
subdivision (b), the jurors request a read or play back of any trial
testimony, the trial judge must follow the procedures set forth in
subdivision (a).

Committee Notes

1968 Adoption. Same as section 919.05, Florida Statutes.

1972 Amendment. This is the same as former rule 3.410,
except that the former rule made it mandatory for the trial judge to
give additional instructions upon request. The committee feels that
this should be discretionary.

Cases Citing Rule 3.410

Total Results: 139

Castor v. State

365 So. 2d 701

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1978 | Docket: 2054128

Cited 254 times | Published

court that the argument lacks merit. [5] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410. [6] We recognized and reaffirmed this principle

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

272 So. 2d 65

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1973 | Docket: 1755077

Cited 102 times | Published

Committee Note: This is the same as former Fla.Rule 3.410, except that the former rule made it mandatory

Category: Criminal Procedure

Roberts v. State

510 So. 2d 885, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 325

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1987 | Docket: 1593209

Cited 76 times | Published

any testimony read to them" within the terms of rule 3.410. Further, and most significantly, even if we

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hall v. Wainwright

733 F.2d 766, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22435

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 16, 1984 | Docket: 434209

Cited 53 times | Published

morning, the judge ensured compliance with Florida Rule 3.410 (to the extent it may apply), which provides:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Castro v. State

547 So. 2d 111, 1989 WL 77504

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1989 | Docket: 1738696

Cited 40 times | Published

opportunity to respond when court reconvened. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410; Roberts v. State, 510 So.2d 885, 891 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pressley v. State

395 So. 2d 1175

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1981 | Docket: 1318125

Cited 40 times | Published

close range. [2] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.420. [3] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410. [4] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.430.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mendoza v. State

700 So. 2d 670, 1997 WL 633315

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1997 | Docket: 1373107

Cited 38 times | Published

attorney and to counsel for defendant. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410. See Hitchcock v. State, 413 So.2d 741,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

488 So. 2d 62, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 199

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1986 | Docket: 1287184

Cited 35 times | Published

directs the material to be taken and may be heard. Rule 3.410 is more explicit. It provides that if the jury

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Terry

336 So. 2d 65

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1976 | Docket: 2521736

Cited 30 times | Published

370 Rule 3.380 Rule 3.390 Rule 3.400 Rule 3.410 Rule 3.420 Rule 3.430 Rule 3.440 Rule

Category: Criminal Procedure

Young v. State

645 So. 2d 965, 1994 WL 570629

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1994 | Docket: 107661

Cited 26 times | Published

other request to have testimony reread. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410. The more difficult issue which is presented

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hildwin v. State

531 So. 2d 124, 1988 WL 93704

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 1988 | Docket: 2517910

Cited 26 times | Published

attorney and to counsel for the defendant. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410. The question the jury asked was within the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Curtis v. State

480 So. 2d 1277, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 533

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1985 | Docket: 1667454

Cited 25 times | Published

fails to show compliance with the procedure of rule 3.410.[2] The district court resolved this silence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Perriman v. State

731 So. 2d 1243, 1999 WL 80411

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1999 | Docket: 1408841

Cited 23 times | Published

query is within the trial court's discretion: Rule 3.410. Jury Request to Review Evidence or for Additional

Category: Criminal Procedure

Henry v. State

359 So. 2d 864

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1978 | Docket: 1735694

Cited 23 times | Published

discretion of the trial judge. See Committee Note, Rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; United

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

538 So. 2d 833, 1989 WL 9191

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 1989 | Docket: 372270

Cited 22 times | Published

defense. This Court has held that violations of rule 3.410 are per se reversible because communication between

Category: Criminal Procedure

Armstrong v. State

73 So. 3d 155, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 517, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 2255, 2011 WL 4389009

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2011 | Docket: 2355336

Cited 20 times | Published

State, 731 So.2d 1243, 1246 (Fla.1999)); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410. “Discretion is abused only when the judicial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hendricks v. State

34 So. 3d 819, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7330, 2010 WL 2077164

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2010 | Docket: 1131165

Cited 20 times | Published

counsel for the defendant. (i) Notice under Rule 3.410 Appellant's argument that the trial court's failure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lebron v. State

799 So. 2d 997, 2001 WL 987233

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2001 | Docket: 1681684

Cited 20 times | Published

juror outside the express notice requirements of rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, a harmless

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bradley v. State

513 So. 2d 112, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 487

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1987 | Docket: 1295029

Cited 19 times | Published

requirements of rule 3.410 should be analyzed using harmless error principles. Id. Rule 3.410 requires: After

Category: Criminal Procedure

Biscardi v. State

511 So. 2d 575, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 986

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1987 | Docket: 1700742

Cited 17 times | Published

some of the testimony. The state points out that rule 3.410, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure, leaves reinstruction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Zamora v. State

361 So. 2d 776

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1978 | Docket: 1288417

Cited 16 times | Published

harmful error, appears to have been based upon Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410. Said rule requires the presence of opposing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Green v. State

907 So. 2d 489, 2005 WL 977018

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2005 | Docket: 459529

Cited 15 times | Published

refusing to answer a jury's question. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410 (providing that if the jury requests additional

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas v. State

730 So. 2d 667, 1998 WL 558881

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1998 | Docket: 1755377

Cited 15 times | Published

court violated Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.410[1] and that such a violation was per se reversible

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mills v. State

620 So. 2d 1006, 1993 WL 209167

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1993 | Docket: 1388049

Cited 15 times | Published

the presence of counsel was enough to satisfy rule 3.410. In rejecting this argument, we noted that "[t]he

Category: Criminal Procedure

Meek v. State

487 So. 2d 1058, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 195

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1986 | Docket: 1796280

Cited 15 times | Published

notification of counsel was sufficient under rule 3.410 and that no violation of the rule occurred. We

Category: Criminal Procedure

McGirth v. State

48 So. 3d 777, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 651, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1935, 2010 WL 4483506

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2010 | Docket: 2396375

Cited 14 times | Published

731 So.2d 1243, 1246 (Fla.1999) (citing Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410). During deliberations, the jury asked whether

Category: Criminal Procedure

Avila v. State

781 So. 2d 413, 2001 WL 38092

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2001 | Docket: 1690449

Cited 11 times | Published

attorney and to counsel for the defendant. Fla.R.Crim P. 3.410. Under this rule, the trial court has wide

Category: Criminal Procedure

Life From the Sea, Inc. v. Levy

502 So. 2d 473, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 310

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1987 | Docket: 1180944

Cited 11 times | Published

jury. There is no civil counterpart to criminal Rule 3.410. The parties are in agreement that there are

Category: Criminal Procedure

Miller v. State

605 So. 2d 492, 1992 WL 212033

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 1992 | Docket: 468456

Cited 10 times | Published

testimony of two *495 witnesses read back to them. Rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure states,

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.

606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1992 | Docket: 2191048

Cited 9 times | Published

1972 Amendment. Same as former Rrule 3.390. RULE 3.410. JURY REQUEST TO REVIEW EVIDENCE OR FOR ADDITIONAL

Category: Criminal Procedure

Colbert v. State

569 So. 2d 433, 1990 WL 165309

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1990 | Docket: 1190038

Cited 9 times | Published

trial judge to respond to a request covered under rule 3.410 without counsel being present and having the

Category: Criminal Procedure

DeCastro v. State

360 So. 2d 474

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 1978 | Docket: 1474241

Cited 8 times | Published

and returned a verdict of guilty. Under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410,[1] it is within the trial court's discretion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hazuri v. State

91 So. 3d 836, 2012 WL 1947879

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2012 | Docket: 60309987

Cited 7 times | Published

trial court never stated that it would disobey rule 3.410 and deny a read-back if requested. Id. The Third

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Merricks

831 So. 2d 156, 2002 WL 31386764

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2002 | Docket: 1722789

Cited 7 times | Published

State, 351 So.2d 26 (Fla.1977), a violation of rule 3.410 must ordinarily be treated as per se reversible

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morgan v. State

377 So. 2d 212

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1979 | Docket: 423654

Cited 7 times | Published

the Florida Supreme Court was construing Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.410 which is concerned with oral requests for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Faulk v. State

296 So. 2d 614

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 1974 | Docket: 1617122

Cited 7 times | Published

of previously given instructions, governed by Rule 3:410 RCrP, 33 F.S.A. We fail to see how the State

Category: Criminal Procedure

Barrow v. State

27 So. 3d 211, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1380, 2010 WL 445388

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2010 | Docket: 1665006

Cited 6 times | Published

prosecuting attorney and to counsel for the defendant. Rule 3.410 gives a trial judge "wide latitude in the area

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

990 So. 2d 1162, 2008 WL 4146369

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 2008 | Docket: 1388227

Cited 6 times | Published

161, 163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410. Third, Smith argues that the trial court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Roper v. State

608 So. 2d 533, 1992 WL 332663

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1992 | Docket: 1732460

Cited 6 times | Published

similar to Huhn). The state argues, of course, that Rule 3.410 is absolutely discretionary and that, therefore

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Prieto

439 So. 2d 288

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1983 | Docket: 1265524

Cited 6 times | Published

discretion. Here it was not. NOTES [1] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410 and Committee Note state: After the jurors

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—Report 2012-07

122 So. 3d 302, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 618, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1894, 2013 WL 4734573

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2013 | Docket: 60234661

Cited 5 times | Published

State v. Barrow, 91 So.3d 826 (Fla. 2012); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410. This instruction was adopted in 2007 [967

Category: Criminal Procedure

Frasilus v. State

46 So. 3d 1028, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13428, 2010 WL 3515553

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 2010 | Docket: 60296104

Cited 5 times | Published

Defense counsel quite properly said that under rule 3.410, a jury may request to have “testimony read to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fruetel v. State

638 So. 2d 966, 1994 WL 203006

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1994 | Docket: 1168469

Cited 5 times | Published

evidence where no notice has been given under rule 3.410. Id. at 715 (emphasis added). Although Vileenor

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Franklin

618 So. 2d 171, 1993 WL 83088

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1993 | Docket: 1720292

Cited 5 times | Published

jury constituted per se reversible error under rule 3.410. Williams, 488 So.2d at 64. In Williams we reaffirmed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Meyer v. Singletary

610 So. 2d 1329, 1992 WL 379896

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1992 | Docket: 1413148

Cited 5 times | Published

that the trial court's failure to comply with rule 3.410 governing jury questions is per se reversible

Category: Criminal Procedure

Farrow v. State

573 So. 2d 161, 1990 WL 177655

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1990 | Docket: 479326

Cited 5 times | Published

GARRETT, Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. Rule 3.410 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provides:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vileenor v. State

500 So. 2d 713, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 202

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1987 | Docket: 1689376

Cited 5 times | Published

outside of the express notice requirements of rule 3.410. Citing Hitchcock, the court declared that communications

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

453 So. 2d 505

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1984 | Docket: 1651281

Cited 5 times | Published

is absent during proceedings contemplated by Rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which provides:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Prieto v. State

708 So. 2d 647, 1998 WL 150687

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1998 | Docket: 1528321

Cited 4 times | Published

correct that the claim was waived. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410. However, more importantly, there was no

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thiefault v. State

655 So. 2d 1277, 1995 WL 334348

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1995 | Docket: 1696827

Cited 4 times | Published

what occurred in this case directly violated rule 3.410 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure which

Category: Criminal Procedure

Villavicencio v. State

449 So. 2d 966

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 1984 | Docket: 423383

Cited 4 times | Published

and Ivory v. State, 351 So.2d 26 (Fla. 1977). Rule 3.410 provides as follows: After the jurors have retired

Category: Criminal Procedure

Crews v. State

442 So. 2d 432

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1983 | Docket: 469151

Cited 4 times | Published

However, this case does not involve a violation of rule 3.410. The jury did not request additional instructions

Category: Criminal Procedure

Turner v. State

431 So. 2d 328

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1983 | Docket: 208616

Cited 4 times | Published

(Fla. 1977), which involved a violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410, is inapplicable. For this reason, we need

Category: Criminal Procedure

Caldwell v. State

340 So. 2d 490

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1976 | Docket: 1709092

Cited 4 times | Published

defendant's counsel and the prosecution. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410. No one is permitted to communicate with

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ivory v. State

330 So. 2d 853

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 1976 | Docket: 1774659

Cited 4 times | Published

which was not in evidence. It is provided in Rule 3.410, RCrP, entitled "Jury Request to Review Evidence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hazuri v. State

23 So. 3d 857, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19625, 2009 WL 4824791

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2009 | Docket: 983525

Cited 3 times | Published

request that testimony be read. The rule states: Rule 3.410. Jury Request to Review Evidence or for Additional

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davis v. State

760 So. 2d 977, 2000 WL 628262

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 2000 | Docket: 1695286

Cited 3 times | Published

allow the court to read back testimony. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410. This preemptive instruction by the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Janson v. State

730 So. 2d 734, 1999 WL 110758

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1999 | Docket: 1755403

Cited 3 times | Published

second time in open court upon request pursuant to rule 3.410. Id. at 967-68. We believe that the same rationale

Category: Criminal Procedure

McKee v. State

712 So. 2d 837, 1998 WL 374722

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1998 | Docket: 1471795

Cited 3 times | Published

610 So.2d 1283, 1286 (Fla. 1992); see also Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.410. However, the State identified a potential

Category: Criminal Procedure

Diaz v. State

567 So. 2d 18, 1990 WL 129929

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1990 | Docket: 1380349

Cited 3 times | Published

well have been technically ill-advised, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410, it cannot result in reversal in the absence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bradley v. State

497 So. 2d 281

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1986 | Docket: 1689775

Cited 3 times | Published

attorney or counsel for defendant as required by rule 3.410. The judge responded by appending to the bottom

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morgan v. State

492 So. 2d 1072, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 441

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 1986 | Docket: 478219

Cited 3 times | Published

Ivory v. State, 351 So.2d 26 (Fla. 1977), nor rule 3.410 requires the defendant's presence when the judge

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hall v. Wainwright

733 F.2d 766

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 16, 1984 | Docket: 66197297

Cited 3 times | Published

morning, the judge ensured compliance with Florida Rule 3.410 (to the extent it may apply), which provides:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Adams v. State

122 So. 3d 976, 2013 WL 5576095, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16224

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2013 | Docket: 60234832

Cited 2 times | Published

Rules of Criminal Procedure and was superseded by rule 3.410. The legislature removed the mandatory language

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sailor v. State

816 So. 2d 182, 2002 WL 825954

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 2002 | Docket: 1753338

Cited 2 times | Published

Characterizing this as a violation of Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410, the appellant maintains that it is per

Category: Criminal Procedure

Merricks v. State

793 So. 2d 119, 2001 WL 936163

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2001 | Docket: 1677969

Cited 2 times | Published

to counsel for the defendant. A violation of rule 3.410 is ordinarily per se reversible error. In Ivory

Category: Criminal Procedure

Greenfield v. State

739 So. 2d 1197, 1999 WL 550651

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1999 | Docket: 1688670

Cited 2 times | Published

(Fla.1998), the supreme court decided that a rule 3.410 violation was not reversible error where defense

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hannah v. State

732 So. 2d 3, 1999 WL 163998

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 1999 | Docket: 460382

Cited 2 times | Published

Florida Supreme Court held that a violation of rule 3.410 is a per se reversible error. Even when there

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lupper v. State

663 So. 2d 1337, 1994 WL 655677

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1994 | Docket: 1313768

Cited 2 times | Published

Florida and this court have expanded the scope of rule 3.410 to encompass not only requests concerning instructions

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gonzalez v. State

624 So. 2d 300, 1993 WL 320983

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1993 | Docket: 475533

Cited 2 times | Published

request to have certain testimony read to them. Rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, gives the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mills v. State

596 So. 2d 1148, 1992 WL 55228

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1992 | Docket: 1385605

Cited 2 times | Published

requested that I respond and your objection is noted. Rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (1991) reads:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morgan v. State

471 So. 2d 1336, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1574

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1985 | Docket: 1397309

Cited 2 times | Published

Rose together, we conclude that violations of rule 3.410 are subject to the harmless error rule.[5] Other

Category: Criminal Procedure

Woodring v. State

448 So. 2d 529

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1984 | Docket: 429309

Cited 2 times | Published

tape recorded jury instructions to the jury, rule 3.410 provides: [A]nd the court may give them such

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas v. State

348 So. 2d 634

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1977 | Docket: 1761094

Cited 2 times | Published

State, 336 So.2d 673 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410. While counsel for the State concedes that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mendez v. State

252 So. 3d 368

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2018 | Docket: 7567938

Cited 1 times | Published

triggering the procedure in subdivision (a) of rule 3.410. As the Florida Supreme Court noted in Hazuri

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gary Richard Whitton v. State of Florida

161 So. 3d 314, 2014 WL 5026410

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2014 | Docket: 1437945

Cited 1 times | Published

of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.410. Rule 3.410 establishes a procedure for trial courts to follow

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bannister v. State

132 So. 3d 267, 2014 WL 52659, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 140

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2014 | Docket: 60238397

Cited 1 times | Published

State, 122 So.3d 976, 979 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). Rule 3.410 imparts upon trial courts “wide latitude in the

Category: Criminal Procedure

McCain v. State

995 So. 2d 1029, 2008 WL 4756397

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 2008 | Docket: 1685081

Cited 1 times | Published

discretion in responding to jury questions, Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410, and the court here could have defined the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Paige v. State

802 So. 2d 1161, 2001 WL 1485725

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 2001 | Docket: 1698726

Cited 1 times | Published

1977), the supreme court held that a violation of rule 3.410 is a per se reversible error. Even when there

Category: Criminal Procedure

Alexander v. State

778 So. 2d 1017, 2000 WL 1854073

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2000 | Docket: 1290271

Cited 1 times | Published

suggests would have answered the jury question. Rule 3.410 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure permits

Category: Criminal Procedure

Key v. State

760 So. 2d 278, 2000 WL 726357

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2000 | Docket: 1695137

Cited 1 times | Published

responded to the jury's request outside his presence. Rule 3.410 provides, After the jurors have retired to consider

Category: Criminal Procedure

McGlynn v. State

697 So. 2d 571, 1997 WL 423437

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1997 | Docket: 1776617

Cited 1 times | Published

should not be honored.... The particular evil rule 3.410 and the per se error standard of Ivory were designed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Westlund v. State

570 So. 2d 1133, 1990 WL 198378

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1990 | Docket: 1349231

Cited 1 times | Published

necessary parties were present pursuant to Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.410. We find no merit in appellant's contention

Category: Criminal Procedure

Flowers v. State

348 So. 2d 602

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1977 | Docket: 1760490

Cited 1 times | Published

the jury returned its verdict against Flowers. Rule 3.410 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure provides:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Alexis Salgado-Mantilla v. the State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2025 | Docket: 69266233

Published

730 So. 2d 667, 668 (Fla. 1998) (holding that a rule 3.410 violation is reversible error but must be preserved

Category: Criminal Procedure

Alexis Salgado-Mantilla v. the State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2024 | Docket: 69266233

Published

730 So. 2d 667, 668 (Fla. 1998) (holding that a rule 3.410 violation is reversible error but must be preserved

Category: Criminal Procedure

Santiago v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2024 | Docket: 69265738

Published

constitute a "formal defect" under rule 3.410. Cf. Snipes v. State, 733 So. 2d 1000, 1005 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Scott McDermott v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2024 | Docket: 69159099

Published

procedures set forth in subdivision (a). Fla. R. Crim P. 3.410 (2021) (emphasis added). According

Category: Criminal Procedure

Joshua Davis v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 2022 | Docket: 64983999

Published

judge responds to a jury request covered under rule 3.410 outside the presence of counsel, the State and

Category: Criminal Procedure

CHRISTOPHER A. STRACHAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 2019 | Docket: 16280859

Published

1. Playing Back Testimony in Violation of Rule 3.410(a) On the defendant’s first argument, the

Category: Criminal Procedure

JOHN MCDONALD v. State of Florida

212 So. 3d 507, 2017 WL 897431, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2999

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 2017 | Docket: 4619348

Published

in part on the ground that the court violated Rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, with regard

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure – Corrected Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2016 | Docket: 3037339

Published

the procedure for taking depositions. Rule 3.410 (Jury Request to Review Evidence or for Additional

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure - Corrected Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2016 | Docket: 3029854

Published

the procedure for taking depositions. Rule 3.410 (Jury Request to Review Evidence or for Additional

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

188 So. 3d 764, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 594, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2949, 2015 WL 10490032

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2015 | Docket: 3008264

Published

to the procedure for taking depositions. Rule 3.410 (Jury Request to Review Evidence or for Additional

Category: Criminal Procedure

& SC12-2522 Gary Richard Whitton v. State of Florida & Gary Richard Whitton v. Michael D. Crews, etc. - Corrected Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2015 | Docket: 2646457

Published

not comprise communication within the scope of rule 3.410, and therefore do not constitute error.3 Whitton’s

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nunez v. State

109 So. 3d 890, 2013 WL 1222940, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4911

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2013 | Docket: 60229862

Published

second time in open court upon request pursuant to Rule 3.410).

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

104 So. 3d 304, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 678, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2667, 2012 WL 5439265

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2012 | Docket: 60227454

Published

court or clerk issue subpoenas. The amendments to rule 3.410 (Jury Request to Review Evidence or for Additional

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

104 So. 3d 304, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 678, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2667, 2012 WL 5439265

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2012 | Docket: 60227454

Published

court or clerk issue subpoenas. The amendments to rule 3.410 (Jury Request to Review Evidence or for Additional

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Barrow

91 So. 3d 826, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 387, 2012 WL 1947880, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 1064

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2012 | Docket: 60309986

Published

“effectively negat[ed] an option allowed the jury under Rule 3.410.” Id. (quoting Roper, 608 So.2d at 535). The

Category: Criminal Procedure

King v. State

59 So. 3d 272, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5203, 2011 WL 1376506

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2011 | Docket: 60299663

Published

trial court’s discretion.”); Fla. R. Crim. P. Rule 3.410 (2007) (“After the jurors have retired to consider

Category: Criminal Procedure

White v. State

31 So. 3d 816, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 42, 2010 WL 45860

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2010 | Docket: 1149233

Published

attorney *818 and to counsel for the defendant. Rule 3.410 does not require that the defendant be present

Category: Criminal Procedure

Diaz v. State

957 So. 2d 104, 2007 WL 1426726

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2007 | Docket: 1269951

Published

Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.410. Id. at 1246. Rule 3.410 provides: After the jurors have retired to consider

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morrow v. State

937 So. 2d 1220, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15489, 2006 WL 2683639

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2006 | Docket: 64846889

Published

Ct. *1221101, 142 L.Ed.2d 81 (1998); cf. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410, 3.420.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dailey v. State

791 So. 2d 586, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11455, 2001 WL 912752

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2001 | Docket: 64807414

Published

significantly, this is not a situation governed by rule 3.410. Even if the issue had been preserved, defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gonzalez v. State

785 So. 2d 526, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16898, 2000 WL 1872552

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2000 | Docket: 64805428

Published

two paragraphs which follow the quotation from Rule 3.410 recite what the defendant’s claims are. See opinion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dixon v. State

768 So. 2d 14, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8992, 2000 WL 986167

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 2000 | Docket: 64800670

Published

defendant contended that the note implicated Rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Because

Category: Criminal Procedure

Grimes v. State

763 So. 2d 1237, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6881, 2000 WL 725302

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2000 | Docket: 64799251

Published

not in evidence was a communication covered by Rule 3.410 and that the trial judge’s failure to consult

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dixon v. State

754 So. 2d 822, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3956

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2000 | Docket: 64796328

Published

defendant contended that the jury note implicated Rule 3.410, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure. Because

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

743 So. 2d 1141, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13175, 1999 WL 790717

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 1999 | Docket: 64791902

Published

response to a question posed by the jury. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410. After attempting to steal some film from

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dixon v. State

768 So. 2d 464, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1299, 1999 WL 68529

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1999 | Docket: 64800747

Published

verdict. The defendant bases his argument on Rule 3.410, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure, which provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pittman v. State

726 So. 2d 340, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 481, 1999 WL 22318

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1999 | Docket: 64786231

Published

trial court to instruct a jury in violation of Rule 3.410. Here, the jury received an improper instruction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Reed v. State

722 So. 2d 980, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 89, 1999 WL 4902

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1999 | Docket: 64785022

Published

660 So.2d 1038, 1046 n. 1 (Fla.1995); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410. GRIFFIN, C.J., and HARRIS and THOMPSON

Category: Criminal Procedure

Woods v. State

712 So. 2d 1184, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7180, 1998 WL 314592

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1998 | Docket: 64781593

Published

to counsel for the defendant,” as required by Rule 3.410, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure. We reverse

Category: Criminal Procedure

Perriman v. State

707 So. 2d 1151, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1356, 1998 WL 65390

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1998 | Docket: 64779775

Published

we cannot agree. The controlling rule, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410, provides only that “[a]fter the jurors have

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas v. State

700 So. 2d 734, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10880, 1997 WL 594113

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1997 | Docket: 64776311

Published

Crim. Pro. 3.410. Although such a violation of rule 3.410 would ordinarily *735constitute per se reversible

Category: Criminal Procedure

Suarez v. State

694 So. 2d 161, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6136, 1997 WL 295171

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1997 | Docket: 64773900

Published

to them during their deliberations. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.410; Miller v. State, 605 So.2d 492, 494-95

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sanders v. State

638 So. 2d 569, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4940, 1994 WL 201393

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1994 | Docket: 64749194

Published

during the jury’s deliberations. Although Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410 requires that the trial judge give such requested

Category: Criminal Procedure

Woods v. State

634 So. 2d 767, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3045, 1994 WL 106235

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1994 | Docket: 64747416

Published

consider that the situation at bar is controlled by rule 3.410, and supreme court case law which holds that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kemp v. State

611 So. 2d 13, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12862, 1992 WL 379814

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1992 | Docket: 64693119

Published

Ivory v. State, 351 So.2d 26 (Fla.1977); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410. *15In view of the above we do not address

Category: Criminal Procedure

Butler v. State

596 So. 2d 787, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4044, 1992 WL 69000

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1992 | Docket: 64666549

Published

prosecuting attorney and to counsel for the defendant. Rule 3.410, Fla.R.Crim.P. Here, the trial court answered

Category: Criminal Procedure

Franklin v. State

590 So. 2d 476, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11921, 1991 WL 253372

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1991 | Docket: 64663719

Published

held that a violation of Rule 3.410 is per se reversible error. Rule 3.410 provides: After the jurors

Category: Criminal Procedure

Porr v. State

585 So. 2d 944, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7799, 1991 WL 150415

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 1991 | Docket: 64661556

Published

within the scope of Rule 3.410. The supreme court has held that any violation of Rule 3.410 is per se reversible

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cherry v. State

572 So. 2d 521, 1990 WL 178649

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 1991 | Docket: 479583

Published

heard regarding the appropriate response. See Rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; Curtis

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bautista v. State

557 So. 2d 104, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 693, 1990 WL 8642

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1990 | Docket: 64648410

Published

response to a jury request for reinstruction under rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, but merely

Category: Criminal Procedure

Whitcraft v. State

528 So. 2d 998, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1816, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3477, 1988 WL 79322

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 1988 | Docket: 64636155

Published

merit in Whitcraft’s contentions and affirm. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410, 3.420; see Spence v. State, 515 So.2d 312

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Colbert

522 So. 2d 436, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 672, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 985, 1988 WL 20079

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1988 | Docket: 64633661

Published

(Fla.1977), the supreme court in considering rule 3.410 held that it is prejudicial error for a trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carroll v. State

513 So. 2d 779, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2395, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12284

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1987 | Docket: 64629988

Published

the jury an instruction without complying with rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The judgment

Category: Criminal Procedure

Singleton v. State

512 So. 2d 1159, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2343, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10416

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 1987 | Docket: 64629662

Published

State, 338 So.2d 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410. Affirmed. . Cf. Dudley v. State, 405 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dixon v. State

506 So. 2d 55, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1110, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7880

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1987 | Docket: 64626706

Published

per se error cases involves violations of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410 which arise when the jurors “request additional

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dixon v. State

506 So. 2d 55, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1110, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7880

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1987 | Docket: 64626706

Published

per se error cases involves violations of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410 which arise when the jurors “request additional

Category: Criminal Procedure

Moore v. State

504 So. 2d 1311, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 722, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7133

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1987 | Docket: 64626209

Published

question was not a type of request falling within rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and (2)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lyons v. State

487 So. 2d 304, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 339, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6275

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1986 | Docket: 64618832

Published

“additional instruction,” within the meaning of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410, is per se reversible error where such instruction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Meek v. State

474 So. 2d 340, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 126, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14736

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1985 | Docket: 64613699

Published

Although Ivory involved a clear violation of Rule 3.410, this case does not. In Ivory, the trial judge

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

468 So. 2d 335, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 967, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13462

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1985 | Docket: 64611738

Published

communication within the terms of the prohibition in Rule 3.410 against giving “additional instructions” without

Category: Criminal Procedure

Curtis v. State

455 So. 2d 1090, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1954, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14962

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1984 | Docket: 64606804

Published

was given. Technically Rose does not involve rule 3.410 because the jury did not “request additional

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

404 So. 2d 861, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21274

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1981 | Docket: 64585533

Published

returned to the jury room, he did not raise the Rule 3.410 objection which is raised on appeal. Point I

Category: Criminal Procedure

Taylor v. State

385 So. 2d 149, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17025

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1980 | Docket: 64576889

Published

Procedure for jury reinstruction is governed by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410: After the jurors have retired to consider

Category: Criminal Procedure

Degeer v. State

349 So. 2d 713, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16271

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 1977 | Docket: 64560044

Published

this colloquy constituted a violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410 (requiring additional instructions to the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Evans v. State

303 So. 2d 68, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8256

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 1974 | Docket: 64542482

Published

sufficient and that the court is given discretion by rule 3.410, Cr'PR, as to the matter of rereading testimony

Category: Criminal Procedure