Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.380 - MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL | Syfert Law

Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.380

RULE 3.380. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL

(a) Timing. If, at the close of the evidence for the state or at
the close of all the evidence in the cause, the court is of the opinion
that the evidence is insufficient to warrant a conviction, it may, and
on the motion of the prosecuting attorney or the defendant shall,
enter a judgment of acquittal.

(b) Waiver. A motion for judgment of acquittal is not waived
by subsequent introduction of evidence on behalf of the defendant.
The motion must fully set forth the grounds on which it is based.

(c) Renewal. If the jury returns a verdict of guilty or is
discharged without having returned a verdict, the defendant’s
motion may be made or renewed within 10 days after the reception
of a verdict and the jury is discharged or such further time as the
court may allow.

Committee Notes

1968 Adoption. Substantially same as section 918.08, Florida
Statutes, except as follows:

(a) The existing statutory practice of granting directed
verdicts is abolished in favor of the federal practice of having the
judge enter a judgment of acquittal.
(b) The wording was changed to comply with the judgment of
acquittal theory. A majority of the committee felt that the substance
of the existing statute was all right, but a minority felt that the
language should be changed so that a defendant would waive an
erroneous denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal by
introducing evidence. This point was raised in Wiggins v. State, 101
So. 2d 833 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958), wherein the court said that this
statute is “ineptly worded.”

1972 Amendment. (a) and (b) same as prior rule 3.660,
transferred to better follow trial chronology. (c) provides time period
for renewal of motion and is new.

1980 Amendment. This brings rule 3.380(c) into conformity
with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.480(b) as it relates to the
number of days (10) within which a party, either in a civil or
criminal case, may make or renew a motion for judgment of
acquittal. There appears to be no sound reason for the distinction
between the criminal rule (4 days or such greater time as the court
may allow, not to exceed 15 days) and the civil rule (10 days).

Cases Citing Rule 3.380

Total Results: 149

Tibbs v. State

397 So. 2d 1120

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1981 | Docket: 2461324

Cited 429 times | Published

Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure were adopted. Rule 3.380(a) provides that a motion for judgment of acquittal

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Law

559 So. 2d 187, 1989 WL 84099

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1989 | Docket: 936787

Cited 302 times | Published

"insufficient to warrant a conviction." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380. It is the trial judge's proper task to review

Category: Criminal Procedure

Darling v. State

808 So. 2d 145, 2002 WL 5497

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 2002 | Docket: 1120141

Cited 133 times | Published

"insufficient to warrant a conviction." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380. It is the trial judge's proper task to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brooks v. State

762 So. 2d 879, 2000 WL 674581

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2000 | Docket: 57131

Cited 124 times | Published

claim for appellate review. See, e.g., Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(b) (stating, in pertinent part, that a motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Crain v. State

894 So. 2d 59, 2004 WL 2404057

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2004 | Docket: 1767692

Cited 106 times | Published

"insufficient to warrant a conviction." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380. It is the trial judge's proper task to

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

272 So. 2d 65

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1973 | Docket: 1755077

Cited 102 times | Published

(a) and (b) substantially the same as former rule 3.380, except that some language has been modernized

Category: Criminal Procedure

McDuffie v. State

970 So. 2d 312, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 763

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2007 | Docket: 1151064

Cited 100 times | Published

So.2d 393, 395-96 (Fla.1988); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(b). For this reason, we first review the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Beasley v. State

774 So. 2d 649, 2000 WL 1588020

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 2000 | Docket: 368435

Cited 74 times | Published

"insufficient to warrant a conviction." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380. It is the trial judge's proper task to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ford v. State

802 So. 2d 1121, 2001 WL 1044912

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2001 | Docket: 57130

Cited 67 times | Published

which evidence has been presented."). Cf. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(a) ("If, at the close of the evidence for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ford v. State

802 So. 2d 1121, 2001 WL 1044912

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2001 | Docket: 57130

Cited 67 times | Published

which evidence has been presented."). Cf. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(a) ("If, at the close of the evidence for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

790 So. 2d 1194, 2001 WL 871441

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 2001 | Docket: 466338

Cited 58 times | Published

acquittal at the close of the state's case. See Fla.R.App.P. 3.380(a). The question presented by the motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dupree v. State

705 So. 2d 90, 1998 WL 2399

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1998 | Docket: 1577032

Cited 48 times | Published

"insufficient to warrant a conviction." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380. (Citations omitted). As the trial court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jaggers v. State

536 So. 2d 321, 1988 WL 137176

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1988 | Docket: 1759626

Cited 41 times | Published

involving appellant's daughter and stepdaughter. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380. The principal incident leading to these

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Creighton

469 So. 2d 735, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 257

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1985 | Docket: 1271981

Cited 36 times | Published

insufficient to warrant convictions. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380.[3] The judge declined to grant judgment

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Terry

336 So. 2d 65

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1976 | Docket: 2521736

Cited 30 times | Published

340 Rule 3.350 Rule 3.360 Rule 3.370 Rule 3.380 Rule 3.390 Rule 3.400 Rule 3.410 Rule

Category: Criminal Procedure

Floyd v. State

850 So. 2d 383, 2002 WL 1926223

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2003 | Docket: 1783692

Cited 24 times | Published

"insufficient to warrant a conviction." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380. It is the trial judge's proper task to

Category: Criminal Procedure

McArthur v. Nourse

369 So. 2d 578

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 1979 | Docket: 470813

Cited 22 times | Published

Rules of Criminal Procedure were adopted.[9] Rule 3.380(a) provides that a motion for judgment of acquittal

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Odom

862 So. 2d 56, 2003 WL 22316815

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 2003 | Docket: 1762836

Cited 21 times | Published

acquittal for possession of cocaine. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380. The trial court granted Odom's motion and

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Rivera

719 So. 2d 335, 1998 WL 601299

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1998 | Docket: 1705031

Cited 20 times | Published

the jury returns a verdict of guilty. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380. The question here is whether the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Green v. State

667 So. 2d 208, 1995 WL 684736

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 1995 | Docket: 1511567

Cited 18 times | Published

grant a motion for judgment of acquittal under rule 3.380. Id. at 188-189. In accord with these well-settled

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

478 So. 2d 885, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2618

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1985 | Docket: 1741520

Cited 18 times | Published

so doing, counsel failed to comply with Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(b) which requires that the motion for judgment

Category: Criminal Procedure

Purifoy v. State

359 So. 2d 446

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1978 | Docket: 1418430

Cited 17 times | Published

2d DCA 1972) (on rehearing). [10] See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380. See generally 29 Am.Jur.2d Evidence § 148

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cunningham v. State

385 So. 2d 721

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1980 | Docket: 1337881

Cited 16 times | Published

reversed in part, and remanded. NOTES [1] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(a). [2] § 948.01(4), Fla. Stat. (1979).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Romero v. State

901 So. 2d 260, 2005 WL 957178

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2005 | Docket: 1666315

Cited 14 times | Published

forth the grounds on which it is based. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(b) (2004). A boilerplate motion is insufficient

Category: Criminal Procedure

Milton Wolfe v. Gerald Coleman, Sheriff Pinellas County Florida and Jim Smith, Attorney General of the State of Florida

681 F.2d 1302, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 16920

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 2, 1982 | Docket: 222964

Cited 14 times | Published

except for direct criminal contempt described in Rule 3.380, to be prosecuted by the judge’s issuing an order

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kilgore v. State

55 So. 3d 487, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 665, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1976, 2010 WL 4643043

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2010 | Docket: 2408020

Cited 13 times | Published

a motion for judgment of acquittal. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380.

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Harris

439 So. 2d 265

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1983 | Docket: 1264982

Cited 13 times | Published

which we are unwilling to do. Our reading of rule 3.380(c) is bolstered by comparing it with Florida

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gosciminski v. State

132 So. 3d 678, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 638, 2013 WL 5313183, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1988

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2013 | Docket: 60238539

Cited 12 times | Published

“insufficient to warrant a conviction.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380. It is the trial judge’s proper task to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thompson v. Crawford

479 So. 2d 169, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2597

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1985 | Docket: 1514375

Cited 12 times | Published

acquittal, may enter a judgment of acquittal. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.380. This may be done only "at the close of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Knight v. State

392 So. 2d 337

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 1981 | Docket: 1267898

Cited 12 times | Published

the decision to affirm only. NOTES [1] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(a).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Munroe v. State

514 So. 2d 397

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1987 | Docket: 1466853

Cited 11 times | Published

did not at any appropriate time invoke either Rule 3.380 or Rule 3.600 of the Florida Rules of Criminal

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Shearod

992 So. 2d 900, 2008 WL 4682524

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2008 | Docket: 1392360

Cited 10 times | Published

insufficient to warrant a conviction." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380. When faced with a motion for judgment of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jackson v. State

995 So. 2d 535, 2008 WL 2940516

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2008 | Docket: 1684544

Cited 10 times | Published

insufficient to warrant a conviction." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(a). The supreme court has outlined the framework

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hudson v. State

711 So. 2d 244, 1998 WL 275927

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1998 | Docket: 1700630

Cited 10 times | Published

insufficient to warrant a conviction." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(a) (1996); cf. United States v. Scott, 437

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ferebee v. State

967 So. 2d 1071, 2007 WL 3307206

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2007 | Docket: 1408462

Cited 9 times | Published

whether a judgment of acquittal [pursuant to rule 3.380] is appropriate, and the `weight of the evidence'

Category: Criminal Procedure

Maglio v. State

918 So. 2d 369, 2005 WL 3478162

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2005 | Docket: 1361445

Cited 9 times | Published

"insufficient to warrant a conviction." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380. It is the trial judge's proper task to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ware v. United States

971 F. Supp. 1442, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10612, 1997 WL 414685

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1997 | Docket: 1486285

Cited 9 times | Published

moved for a judgment of acquittal under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380, which was denied by the court. Id. After

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.

606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1992 | Docket: 2191048

Cited 9 times | Published

trial). X. CONDUCT OF TRIAL; JURY INSTRUCTIONS RULE 3.380. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL (a) Timing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Adams v. State

367 So. 2d 635

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 1979 | Docket: 1697886

Cited 9 times | Published

of evidence on behalf of the defendant. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380, former Rule 1.660[3.660], Sec. 918.08, Florida

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ortiz v. State

36 So. 3d 901, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8187, 2010 WL 2292106

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2010 | Docket: 1639011

Cited 8 times | Published

acquittal of first degree petit theft. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(c); see State v. Stevens, 694 So.2d 731

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pennington v. State

526 So. 2d 87, 1987 WL 912

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1987 | Docket: 1272607

Cited 8 times | Published

introduction of evidence in his defense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380. The State may not rely upon evidence presented

Category: Criminal Procedure

State Ex Rel. Bludworth v. Kapner

394 So. 2d 541

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1981 | Docket: 1692186

Cited 8 times | Published

acquittal, may enter a judgment of acquittal. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380. This may be done only "at the close of the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Garcia v. State

854 So. 2d 758, 2003 WL 22047227

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2003 | Docket: 1747227

Cited 7 times | Published

motion for judgment of acquittal pursuant to rule 3.380(c). Once again, the motion was denied. Garcia

Category: Criminal Procedure

Leonard v. State

731 So. 2d 712, 1999 WL 111137

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1999 | Docket: 1409126

Cited 7 times | Published

"insufficient to warrant a conviction." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380. It is the trial judge's proper task to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Helton v. State

641 So. 2d 146, 1994 WL 386430

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1994 | Docket: 2517542

Cited 7 times | Published

"insufficient to warrant a conviction." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380. It is the trial judge's proper task to review

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kelley v. State

637 So. 2d 972, 1994 WL 241730

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1994 | Docket: 422485

Cited 7 times | Published

Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure were adopted. Rule 3.380(a) provides that a motion for judgment of acquittal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

590 So. 2d 982, 1991 WL 259449

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1991 | Docket: 458081

Cited 7 times | Published

convicted Jones of both charges on February 1, 1991. Rule 3.380(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, permits

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

531 So. 2d 212, 1988 WL 93295

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1988 | Docket: 1528538

Cited 7 times | Published

forth the grounds upon which it is based. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(b). Therefore, a general "boilerplate" motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

McGeorge v. State

386 So. 2d 29

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1980 | Docket: 477057

Cited 7 times | Published

Mancini v. State, 273 So.2d 371 (Fla. 1973). Rule 3.380(b), Fla.R.Crim.P. (1977). Appellant has alleged

Category: Criminal Procedure

Christopher Maurice Bell v. State of Florida

248 So. 3d 208

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2018 | Docket: 6565396

Cited 6 times | Published

decided under different standards. Compare Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.380(a) (directing a court to enter a judgment

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rocker v. State

122 So. 3d 898, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14066, 2013 WL 4610003

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2013 | Docket: 60234802

Cited 6 times | Published

court must enter a judgment of acquittal. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(a). Our review of the trial court’s- ruling

Category: Criminal Procedure

Santiago v. State

874 So. 2d 617, 2004 WL 587640

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2004 | Docket: 1473662

Cited 6 times | Published

Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure were adopted. Rule 3.380(a) provides that a motion for judgment of acquittal

Category: Criminal Procedure

RM v. State

763 So. 2d 1060, 1999 WL 492675

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1999 | Docket: 1681695

Cited 6 times | Published

do the criminal rules of procedure. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(a). Instead, a motion for dismissal may

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hornsby v. State

680 So. 2d 598, 1996 WL 538915

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1996 | Docket: 293845

Cited 6 times | Published

appellate court to review the issue. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(b); Steinhorst v. State, 412 So.2d 332 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wagner v. State

421 So. 2d 826

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1982 | Docket: 1719544

Cited 6 times | Published

introduction of evidence in his defense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380. The State may not rely upon evidence presented

Category: Criminal Procedure

Patterson v. State

391 So. 2d 344

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1980 | Docket: 473521

Cited 6 times | Published

fully set forth the ground on which it is based. Rule 3.380(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; G.W

Category: Criminal Procedure

GWB v. State

340 So. 2d 969

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1977 | Docket: 2585485

Cited 6 times | Published

forth the grounds on which they were based. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(b). The only argument made in support of

Category: Criminal Procedure

JAS v. State

920 So. 2d 759, 2006 WL 305439

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2006 | Docket: 1441061

Cited 5 times | Published

case. Compare Fed.R.Crim.P. 29(a), with Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(b); see also Walker v. State, 604 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Daniels v. State

777 So. 2d 1113, 2001 WL 76699

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2001 | Docket: 1513989

Cited 5 times | Published

"insufficient to warrant a conviction." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380. Dupree, 705 So.2d at 94. We went on to explain

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morris v. State

721 So. 2d 725, 1998 WL 850457

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1998 | Docket: 1322845

Cited 5 times | Published

these two cases stems from an interpretation of rule 3.380(b) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Starks v. State

223 So. 3d 1045, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3729, 2017 WL 1067815

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2017 | Docket: 4620326

Cited 4 times | Published

his motion for judgment of acquittal. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.380(b) (providing that a motion for judgment

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Stone

42 So. 3d 279, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10849, 2010 WL 2925691

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 2010 | Docket: 2399888

Cited 4 times | Published

insufficient to warrant a conviction." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(a) (1996). When an appeal is taken from

Category: Criminal Procedure

EHA v. State

760 So. 2d 1117, 2000 WL 873701

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2000 | Docket: 1325072

Cited 4 times | Published

`insufficient to warrant a conviction.' Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380." Dupree, 705 So.2d at 94 (quoting State

Category: Criminal Procedure

Baker v. State

760 So. 2d 1085, 2000 WL 799366

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 2000 | Docket: 1695149

Cited 4 times | Published

robbery or first degree felony murder. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(b); Morris v. State, 721 So.2d 725 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Franklin v. State

718 So. 2d 902, 1998 WL 636790

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1998 | Docket: 466452

Cited 4 times | Published

744, 745 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380. AFFIRMED. GRIFFIN, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Stevens

694 So. 2d 731, 1997 WL 251065

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1997 | Docket: 1450646

Cited 4 times | Published

FIRST TIME IN A POST-TRIAL MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 3.380(c)? Stevens v. State, 680 So.2d 569, 571 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dept. of Hwy. Safety v. Farley

633 So. 2d 69, 1994 WL 46929

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1994 | Docket: 1707914

Cited 4 times | Published

Pennington, 534 So.2d 393 (Fla. 1988); see also, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(b). At the conclusion of Farley's testimony

Category: Criminal Procedure

Albert Herman Freer v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, State of Florida

935 F.2d 213, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 14369, 1991 WL 107493

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 9, 1991 | Docket: 553714

Cited 4 times | Published

argued on a motion for acquittal pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(c). Such a motion must be granted if the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hampton v. State

549 So. 2d 1059, 1989 WL 104142

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1989 | Docket: 1373538

Cited 4 times | Published

"insufficient to warrant a conviction." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380. It is the trial judge's proper task to review

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dean v. State

430 So. 2d 491

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 1983 | Docket: 1508834

Cited 4 times | Published

as such, the request was untimely under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(c) and was properly denied on that ground

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cornwell v. State

425 So. 2d 1189

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1983 | Docket: 2573657

Cited 4 times | Published

fully set forth the ground on which it is based. Rule 3.380(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; Sanderson

Category: Criminal Procedure

Magueira v. State

352 So. 2d 587

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 1977 | Docket: 1726123

Cited 4 times | Published

statement of grounds therefor, as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(b). See: G.W.B. v. State, 340 So.2d 969 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Brooks

17 So. 3d 1261, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14078, 2009 WL 3013741

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2009 | Docket: 60249077

Cited 3 times | Published

after the jury rendered its verdict. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(c). Section 827.03(3)(c) provides that it

Category: Criminal Procedure

Etienne v. State

15 So. 3d 890, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10743, 2009 WL 2382279

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 2009 | Docket: 1660998

Cited 3 times | Published

forth the grounds on which it [was] based." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(b); see also Carranza v. State, 985 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carranza v. State

985 So. 2d 1199, 2008 WL 2663701

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2008 | Docket: 1673227

Cited 3 times | Published

733 So.2d 980, 984 (Fla.1999) (quoting Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(b)) (citations omitted). Nevertheless, had

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Nichols

892 So. 2d 1221, 2005 WL 350332

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2005 | Docket: 471896

Cited 3 times | Published

verdicts, we deem them submitted pursuant to Rule 3.380(a) and (c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morris v. State

689 So. 2d 1275, 1997 WL 125897

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1997 | Docket: 1477227

Cited 3 times | Published

renew the motion at the conclusion of his case. Rule 3.380(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provides:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Meus v. Eagle Family Discount Stores, Inc.

499 So. 2d 840, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1773

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1986 | Docket: 1731308

Cited 3 times | Published

the motion for judgment of acquittal. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380; Fed.R. Crim.P. 29. The difference between

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Laury

397 So. 2d 960

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1981 | Docket: 1357098

Cited 3 times | Published

judgment of acquittal as to any charge. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(a). Even after verdict, if the trial court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Villageliu v. State

347 So. 2d 445

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1977 | Docket: 1687132

Cited 3 times | Published

introduced evidence in his own behalf. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380. Even if properly made, a denial of the motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

MOSES MITCHELL v. STATE OF FLORIDA

245 So. 3d 805

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2018 | Docket: 6375009

Cited 2 times | Published

” Velloso, 117 So. 3d at 905; see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.380(a). Motions for a new trial are assessed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Patrick Albert Evans v. State of Florida

177 So. 3d 1219, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 700, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2538, 2015 WL 7008526

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2015 | Docket: 3012078

Cited 2 times | Published

‘‘insufficient to warrant a conviction.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380. It is the trial judge’s proper task to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Spence-Jones v. Rundle

991 F. Supp. 2d 1221, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183579, 2013 WL 6925446

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2013 | Docket: 65996700

Cited 2 times | Published

unsuccessfully moved for Judgment of Acquittal pursuant to Rule 3.380 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, arguing

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Sims

110 So. 3d 113, 2013 WL 1194940, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5047

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 2013 | Docket: 60230182

Cited 2 times | Published

*116“insufficient to warrant a conviction.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.380. Law, 559 So.2d at 189. In our view, the

Category: Criminal Procedure

McBride v. State

7 So. 3d 1146, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2281, 2009 WL 723516

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2009 | Docket: 1225519

Cited 2 times | Published

to warrant a conviction.' " Id. (quoting Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380). The trial court should not grant a motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

912 So. 2d 686, 2005 WL 2736542

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2005 | Docket: 1755525

Cited 2 times | Published

acquittal at the close of the state's case. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(a). The question presented by the motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hampton v. State

886 So. 2d 319, 2004 WL 2534308

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2004 | Docket: 1379760

Cited 2 times | Published

733 So.2d 980, 984 (Fla.1999) (quoting Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(b)) (citations omitted). A boilerplate motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fergien v. State

79 So. 3d 907, 2012 WL 513011, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2464

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2012 | Docket: 60305412

Cited 1 times | Published

decided under different tests. Compare Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(a) (directing judgment of acquittal when

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Hampton

44 So. 3d 661, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14538, 2010 WL 3813183

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2010 | Docket: 1928023

Cited 1 times | Published

could not be raised in a motion filed pursuant to rule 3.380(c). I. The Facts On the afternoon of June 5

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

1 So. 3d 1164, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 557, 2009 WL 185994

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2009 | Docket: 1653836

Cited 1 times | Published

by a motion for a judgment of acquittal under rule 3.380 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Spioch v. State

954 So. 2d 47, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3855, 2007 WL 776521

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2007 | Docket: 64850157

Cited 1 times | Published

insufficiency in the evidence); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(b) (requiring that a motion for judgment

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brack v. State

919 So. 2d 578, 2006 WL 51131

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 2006 | Docket: 1269263

Cited 1 times | Published

forth the grounds on which it is based. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(b). "[A] motion which asserts that the state

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Andrews

820 So. 2d 1016, 2002 WL 1430000

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2002 | Docket: 1715695

Cited 1 times | Published

Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure were adopted. Rule 3.380(a) provides that a motion for judgment of acquittal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ernest Lawson v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 2025 | Docket: 70891682

Published

2d 260, 265 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (citing Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.380(b) (2004)). A boilerplate motion for judgment

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bahram Azin v. the State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2024 | Docket: 69266231

Published

Azin has waived this alleged error. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.380(b) (“The motion [for judgment of acquittal]

Category: Criminal Procedure

BRYAN CARLOS RODRIGUEZ v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 2021 | Docket: 61574110

Published

suffice. See Brooks, 762 So. 2d at 895; Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.380(b) (providing that a motion for judgment

Category: Criminal Procedure

Baker v. State

262 So. 3d 241

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2018 | Docket: 64701387

Published

under a different legal standard. Compare Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.380(a) (directing judgment of acquittal when

Category: Criminal Procedure

Baker v. State

262 So. 3d 241

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2018 | Docket: 64701386

Published

under a different legal standard. Compare Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.380(a) (directing judgment of acquittal when

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jesse Eli Baker v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2018 | Docket: 8455143

Published

under a different legal standard. Compare Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.380(a) (directing judgment of acquittal when

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Lundy

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 2017 | Docket: 6240834

Published

renewed motion for a judgment of acquittal under Rule 3.380(c): If the jury returns a verdict of guilty

Category: Criminal Procedure

Willie K. Clay v. State

226 So. 3d 346, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 12568, 2017 WL 3785802

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2017 | Docket: 6148683

Published

subsequently introducing evidence. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.380(b); see also Franklin v. State, 718 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vass v. State

224 So. 3d 279, 2017 WL 2960768, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9986

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2017 | Docket: 6088799

Published

review); Amend. to Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.380(b), 745 So.2d 319 (Fla. 1998) (amending rule 3.380(b) to reflect

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kenneth Karlston Newsome v. State of Florida

199 So. 3d 510, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13342, 2016 WL 4607836

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 2016 | Docket: 4419306

Published

forth the grounds on which it is based.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.380(b). Accordingly, to preserve either or

Category: Criminal Procedure

Netrievae White v. State of Florida

183 So. 3d 1168, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 223, 2016 WL 67359

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2016 | Docket: 3026037

Published

Stevens, 694 So.2d 731, 733 (Fla.1997). Rule 3.380(c) states that a motion for judgment of acquittal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Raul Eduardo Banegas-Membran v. State of Florida

182 So. 3d 865, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 235, 2016 WL 72547

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2016 | Docket: 3026026

Published

considering a motion for judgment of acquittal under rule 3.380, a trial court must determine as a matter of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Raul Eduardo Banegas-Membran v. State of Florida

182 So. 3d 865, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 235, 2016 WL 72547

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2016 | Docket: 3026026

Published

considering a motion for judgment of acquittal under rule 3.380, a trial court must determine as a matter of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Patrick Albert Evans v. State of Florida Corrected Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2015 | Docket: 3019910

Published

“insufficient to warrant a conviction.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.380. It is the trial judge’s proper

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kevin Burks Jershun v. State of Florida

169 So. 3d 232, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9973, 2015 WL 3988120

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 2015 | Docket: 2679217

Published

supplying essential elements of the state’s case). Rule 3.380(b) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Antonio Morales v. State of Florida

170 So. 3d 63

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2015 | Docket: 2659817

Published

sought and the grounds therefor”). See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(b) (a motion for judgment of acquittal must

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

85 So. 3d 1160, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5545, 2012 WL 1192071

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 2012 | Docket: 2414500

Published

733 So.2d 980, 984 (Fla.1999). See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(b) (motion for judgment of acquittal must

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cordero-Artigas v. State

75 So. 3d 838, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19726, 2011 WL 6117120

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2011 | Docket: 60303959

Published

“insufficient to warrant a conviction.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380.’ ” Darling v. State, 808 So.2d 145, 155-56

Category: Criminal Procedure

Perez v. State

959 So. 2d 408, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9498, 2007 WL 1755741

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2007 | Docket: 64851276

Published

and 3.380, this motion is not cognizable under rule 3.380 as 3.380 pertains to a motion for Judgment of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Koy v. State

944 So. 2d 1233, 2006 WL 3751300

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2006 | Docket: 1649334

Published

such further time as the court may allow. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(c). In State v. Stevens, 694 So.2d 731,

Category: Criminal Procedure

J.A.S. v. State

920 So. 2d 759, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1685

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2006 | Docket: 64842358

Published

case. Compare Fed.R.Crim.P. 29(a), with Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(b); see also Walker v. State, 604 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

McClora v. State

870 So. 2d 120, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18327, 2003 WL 22848960

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 2003 | Docket: 64829617

Published

at the close of all the evidence.1 See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(b) (1997). Additionally, the trial court

Category: Criminal Procedure

McClora v. State

870 So. 2d 120, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18327, 2003 WL 22848960

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 2003 | Docket: 64829617

Published

at the close of all the evidence.1 See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(b) (1997). Additionally, the trial court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vargas v. State

845 So. 2d 220, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4125, 2003 WL 1568266

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2003 | Docket: 64822821

Published

forth the grounds on which it is based.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(b) (emphasis added); Woods v. State, 733

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Nicholson

819 So. 2d 908, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8552, 2002 WL 1332256

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 2002 | Docket: 64816101

Published

equivalent of a motion for judgment of acquittal under Rule 3.380(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. On August

Category: Criminal Procedure

T.H. v. State

782 So. 2d 995, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5156, 2001 WL 388024

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2001 | Docket: 64804887

Published

victim: [Cjounsel failed to comply with Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.380(b) which requires that the motion for judgment

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brandon v. State

768 So. 2d 1189, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11881, 2000 WL 1344624

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2000 | Docket: 64800878

Published

State, 680 So.2d 598 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); see also Rule 3.380(b), Fla. R.Crim. P. (a motion for judgment of

Category: Criminal Procedure

E.H.A. v. State

760 So. 2d 1117, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8264

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2000 | Docket: 64798164

Published

‘insufficient to warrant a conviction.’ Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380.” Dupree, 705 So.2d at 94 (quoting State

Category: Criminal Procedure

James v. State

741 So. 2d 546, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9845, 1999 WL 512089

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1999 | Docket: 64791055

Published

“insufficient to warrant a conviction.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380. *549It is the trial judge’s proper task

Category: Criminal Procedure

R.M. v. State

763 So. 2d 1060, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9296

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1999 | Docket: 64799180

Published

do the criminal rules of procedure. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(a). Instead, a motion for dismissal may

Category: Criminal Procedure

Butler v. State

731 So. 2d 862, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6417, 1999 WL 312302

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1999 | Docket: 64788034

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(b); Griffin v. State, 705 So.2d 572, 573 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998);

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.380(b)

745 So. 2d 319, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 623, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 2214, 1998 WL 849515

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1998 | Docket: 64792373

Published

PER CURIAM. On our own motion, we amend rule 3.380(b) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure with

Category: Criminal Procedure

Melgares v. State

711 So. 2d 1389, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7893, 1998 WL 347563

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1998 | Docket: 64781276

Published

512 n. 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(b); State v. Pennington, 534 So.2d 393,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Guerra v. State

696 So. 2d 535, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 15110, 1997 WL 375065

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1997 | Docket: 64774759

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(b); See Bertolotti v. Dugger, 514 So.2d 1095 (Fla.1987);

Category: Criminal Procedure

Leon v. State

695 So. 2d 1265, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6726, 1997 WL 330614

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1997 | Docket: 64774541

Published

on the merits, as rule 3.380(c) so plainly allows him to do. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(c) (motion for judgment

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodriguez v. State

688 So. 2d 1023, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1830, 1997 WL 91411

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1997 | Docket: 64771523

Published

not preserved for appellate review. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.380(b); James v. State, 525 So.2d 426, 427 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stevens v. State

680 So. 2d 569, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4409, 1996 WL 449856

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1996 | Docket: 64767894

Published

the “made or renewed” language has been part of rule 3.380(c) for over two decades, only one Florida decision

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rains v. State

671 So. 2d 815, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2686, 1996 WL 125677

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1996 | Docket: 64763863

Published

case, fails to comply with the requirement of Rule 3.380(b) that a motion for judgment of acquittal “must

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lord v. State

667 So. 2d 817, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13490, 1995 WL 763427

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1995 | Docket: 64762183

Published

“insufficient to warrant a conviction.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380. It is the trial judge’s proper task to review

Category: Criminal Procedure

Luscomb v. State

660 So. 2d 1099, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8993, 1995 WL 502059

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1995 | Docket: 64759059

Published

“insufficient to warrant a conviction.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380. It is the trial judge’s proper task to review

Category: Criminal Procedure

Goodloe v. State

656 So. 2d 278, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6698, 1995 WL 366703

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 1995 | Docket: 64757170

Published

cert. denied, 295 So.2d 302 (Fla.1974); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.380(b).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. Singletary

883 F. Supp. 1535, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5837, 1995 WL 254338

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1995 | Docket: 1707828

Published

forth the grounds on which it is based." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(b); Hardwick v. State, 630 So.2d 1212, (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Colligan

604 So. 2d 547, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9158, 1992 WL 197777

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 1992 | Docket: 64669511

Published

motion for judgment of acquittal pursuant to Rule 3.380(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (if the

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Rudolph

595 So. 2d 297, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2722, 1992 WL 51247

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1992 | Docket: 64665885

Published

“insufficient to warrant a conviction.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380. It is the trial judge’s proper task to review

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Wright

575 So. 2d 1385, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2360

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1991 | Docket: 64657078

Published

Baker, 540 So.2d 847 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(c).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stanley v. State

560 So. 2d 1269, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2636, 1990 WL 45283

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1990 | Docket: 64650353

Published

denied, 360 So.2d 1249 (Fla.1978); see abo Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(a). . The requested and approved instruction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Florida Bar

536 So. 2d 178, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 1480, 1988 WL 143330

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1988 | Docket: 64639473

Published

CHANGE The new language more closely follows Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380. RULE 8.230. MOTION FOR REHEARING (a) Basis

Category: Criminal Procedure

Florida Bar

530 So. 2d 920, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 506, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 1527, 1988 WL 90342

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1988 | Docket: 64636905

Published

CHANGE The new language more closely follows Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380. REASON FOR CHANGE A comma is needed before

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wolkooski v. State

510 So. 2d 1149, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1915, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9808

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1987 | Docket: 64628773

Published

Swift, 481 So.2d 26 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380. AFFIRMED. JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur

Category: Criminal Procedure

Flint v. State

502 So. 2d 1, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1131, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7817

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1986 | Docket: 64624841

Published

acquittal at the close of the evidence as required by rule 3.380, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. It is further

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Foster

438 So. 2d 501, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21833

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 1983 | Docket: 64599837

Published

denied. BOARDMAN and RYDER, JJ., concur. . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(a) provides: If, at the close of the evidence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Back v. State

412 So. 2d 916, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29206

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1982 | Docket: 64589339

Published

evidence of intent to commit theft. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(b); Patterson v. State, 391 So.2d 344 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

H. L. A. v. State

395 So. 2d 250, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19635

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1981 | Docket: 64581009

Published

counterpart under the Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 3.380(a), that “if at the close of the evidence for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Florida Bar

389 So. 2d 610, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4378

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1980 | Docket: 64578555

Published

Rule had no counterpart in the criminal rules. RULE 3.380: MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL (c). If the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Genter v. State

362 So. 2d 333, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 22512

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1978 | Docket: 64565958

Published

State, 352 So.2d 587 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(b); Baisden v. State, 203 So.2d 194 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

G. W. B. v. State

340 So. 2d 969, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16106

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1976 | Docket: 64556417

Published

forth the grounds on which they were based. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(b). The only argument made in support of

Category: Criminal Procedure