Cases Citing Rule 3.300
Total Results: 50
272 So. 2d 65
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1973 | Docket: 1755077
Cited 102 times | Published
shall be called.
Committee Note: Same as prior rule 3.300; order of rule changed to improve chronology
Category: Criminal Procedure
390 So. 2d 315
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1980 | Docket: 1254274
Cited 69 times | Published
the state and the defendant consent. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.300(b). In addition, the objection also would
Category: Criminal Procedure
866 So. 2d 51, 2004 WL 178582
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2004 | Docket: 1680037
Cited 34 times | Published
not contend that the venire was unsworn or that rule 3.300 was violated but claims that a new trial is necessitated
Category: Criminal Procedure
259 So. 2d 153
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1972 | Docket: 471593
Cited 31 times | Published
unless otherwise ordered by the Court. FRCrP Rule 3.300, 33 F.S.A. Such an objection comes too late after
Category: Criminal Procedure
336 So. 2d 65
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1976 | Docket: 2521736
Cited 30 times | Published
3.250
Rule 3.270 Rule 3.280 Rule 3.290
Rule 3.300 Rule 3.320 Rule 3.330
Rule 3.340 Rule
Category: Criminal Procedure
824 So. 2d 977, 2002 WL 1906146
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2002 | Docket: 1729381
Cited 28 times | Published
to individually examine the jurors. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.300(b) (stating that "[c]ounsel for both the
Category: Criminal Procedure
426 So. 2d 1021, 39 A.L.R. 4th 454
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1983 | Docket: 1683796
Cited 23 times | Published
whether the juror is qualified to serve, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.300(b); Ritter v. Jimenez, 343 So.2d 659 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
596 So. 2d 1083, 1992 WL 38333
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1992 | Docket: 8325
Cited 21 times | Published
rules of criminal and civil procedure, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.300; Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.431(c), or perhaps to the
Category: Criminal Procedure
424 So. 2d 148
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1982 | Docket: 1708216
Cited 18 times | Published
of each juror orally shall be preserved.
Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.300(b).
[4] Loftin v. Wilson, 67 So.2d 185 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
829 So. 2d 289, 2002 WL 31322780
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2002 | Docket: 1454303
Cited 15 times | Published
29 Fla. 543, 10 So. 736 (1892); compare Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.300(a) with Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.360 (requiring
Category: Criminal Procedure
286 So. 2d 532
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1973 | Docket: 430530
Cited 14 times | Published
as being unconstitutionally drawn pursuant to Rule 3.300, F.R.Cr.Pr., and Sections F.S. 40.01(1) and (3)
Category: Criminal Procedure
707 So. 2d 664, 1998 WL 19195
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1998 | Docket: 1259421
Cited 11 times | Published
being allowed to personally question the juror.
Rule 3.300(b) provides that counsel for both the state and
Category: Criminal Procedure
640 So. 2d 1079, 1994 WL 178137
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1994 | Docket: 1371651
Cited 10 times | Published
Willacy argues that the denial was a violation of rule 3.300(b) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
378 So. 2d 797
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 1979 | Docket: 1795400
Cited 10 times | Published
the court and by counsel, is assured by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.300(b). See also Barker v. Randolph, 239 So.2d
Category: Criminal Procedure
606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1992 | Docket: 2191048
Cited 9 times | Published
order of rule changed to improve chronology.
RULE 3.300. VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION, OATH, AND EXCUSING OF
Category: Criminal Procedure
343 So. 2d 921
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 1977 | Docket: 1304246
Cited 8 times | Published
reasonable doubt, as specifically authorized by Rule 3.300(b), Fla.R.Crim.P. The fact that the trial judge
Category: Criminal Procedure
368 So. 2d 1291
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1979 | Docket: 2559806
Cited 7 times | Published
ADMINISTERED TO A LARGE PROSPECTIVE PANEL UNDER RULE 3.300(a) OR DOES THE TRIAL COMMENCE WHEN THE PANEL
Category: Criminal Procedure
826 So. 2d 457, 2002 WL 31026948
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2002 | Docket: 1197768
Cited 6 times | Published
questions regarding their qualifications. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.300(a). The defendant does not contend that the
Category: Criminal Procedure
816 So. 2d 187, 2002 WL 832009
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2002 | Docket: 1753370
Cited 5 times | Published
record in some manner to establish compliance with rule 3.300.
However, Martin failed to raise this objection
Category: Criminal Procedure
718 So. 2d 822, 1998 WL 329436
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1998 | Docket: 1515115
Cited 5 times | Published
examination of prospective jurors by counsel. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.300(b) ("Counsel for both the state and the
Category: Criminal Procedure
744 So. 2d 1103, 1999 WL 791527
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 1999 | Docket: 1380835
Cited 4 times | Published
Lavado v. State, 492 So.2d 1322 (Fla.1986); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.300(b). We disagree.
On this point, the record
Category: Criminal Procedure
268 So. 2d 544
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1972 | Docket: 1739338
Cited 4 times | Published
any timely objection with regard thereto. See Rule 3.300 CrPR, 33 F.S.A., State v. Silva, Fla. 1972, 259
Category: Criminal Procedure
785 So. 2d 662, 2001 WL 487087
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2001 | Docket: 539711
Cited 3 times | Published
conduct individual voir dire as authorized under rule 3.300, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
The trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
332 So. 2d 146
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1976 | Docket: 1314167
Cited 2 times | Published
administration of the oath prescribed therefor in Rule 3.300(a) RCrP, following which they were examined as
Category: Criminal Procedure
172 So. 3d 1018, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13614, 2015 WL 5306230
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 2015 | Docket: 60250007
Cited 1 times | Published
*1022their voir dire which is guaranteed by Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.300(b). In construing this rule, we recently
Category: Criminal Procedure
136 So. 3d 770, 42 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1657, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6169, 2014 WL 1665920
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2014 | Docket: 60240084
Cited 1 times | Published
TRIAL,” which includes rules governing voir dire (Rule 3.300), juror oaths (Rule 3.360), and numerous rules
Category: Criminal Procedure
869 So. 2d 725, 2004 WL 735437
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2004 | Docket: 1175366
Cited 1 times | Published
fulfill her obligations as a juror. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.300(b); Melendez v. State, 700 So.2d 791, 792
Category: Criminal Procedure
848 So. 2d 418, 2003 WL 21471876
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2003 | Docket: 1309334
Cited 1 times | Published
answers during the voir dire proceedings.
See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.300(a). He cites Fernandez v. State, 814 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
830 So. 2d 265, 2002 WL 31526487
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2002 | Docket: 1516799
Cited 1 times | Published
are satisfied that there was compliance with rule 3.300(a). However, difficult problems were presented
Category: Criminal Procedure
268 So. 2d 548
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1972 | Docket: 64528532
Cited 1 times | Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the authority of Rule 3.300 CrPR, 33 F.S.A.; State v. Silva, Fla.1970, 259 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2025 | Docket: 70186668
Published
collectively or individually. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.300(b).
Courts interpret rule 3.300(b) to provide for a “reasonable”
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2020 | Docket: 18620292
Published
fulfill the obligations of a juror. See
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.300(b), (c). While the trial court may also
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 2019 | Docket: 16280859
Published
the guise that it would be
repetitive.”); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.300(b) (“Counsel for both the state and
defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 2017 | Docket: 6240849
Published
5
for cause. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.300(c) and § 913.03, Fla. Stat. (2015) (addressing
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2016 | Docket: 3037339
Published
-8-
rule 3.300(d) (Voir Dire Examination, Oath, and Excusing
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2016 | Docket: 3029854
Published
-8-
rule 3.300(d) (Voir Dire Examination, Oath, and Excusing
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2016 | Docket: 3029854
Published
-8-
rule 3.300(d) (Voir Dire Examination, Oath, and Excusing
Category: Criminal Procedure
188 So. 3d 764, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 594, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2949, 2015 WL 10490032
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2015 | Docket: 3008264
Published
same reason, the Committee’s proposal to amend rule 3.300(d) (Voir Dire Examination, Oath, and Excusing
Category: Criminal Procedure
95 So. 3d 327, 2012 WL 3023170, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11968
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2012 | Docket: 60311186
Published
question potential jurors, see Fla. R.Crim. P. Rule 3.300(b), he should have done so in English, and used
Category: Criminal Procedure
898 So. 2d 1141, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4480, 2005 WL 735283
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 2005 | Docket: 64837458
Published
thought defense counsel was “wasting time.”1
Rule 3.300(b) provides that “[c]ounsel for both the state
Category: Criminal Procedure
898 So. 2d 1036, 2005 WL 562750
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 2005 | Docket: 1732335
Published
jurors were sworn before jury selection.
Under rule 3.300(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, prospective
Category: Criminal Procedure
842 So. 2d 279, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 5422, 2003 WL 1877418
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2003 | Docket: 64822010
Published
their voir dire which is guaranteed by Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.300(b). In construing this rule, we recently
Category: Criminal Procedure
842 So. 2d 298, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 5413, 2003 WL 1877953
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2003 | Docket: 64822019
Published
panel was brought to court and sworn pursuant to rule 3.300(a) within the time provided under rule 3.191
Category: Criminal Procedure
827 So. 2d 279, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12005, 2002 WL 1906207
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2002 | Docket: 64817870
Published
governed by clear rules. One such provision, rule 3.300(c), deals with the trial judge excusing prospective
Category: Criminal Procedure
700 So. 2d 153, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11592, 1997 WL 631268
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1997 | Docket: 64776120
Published
waive his asserted “right” to voir dire. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.300(b). Because *154the record clearly shows
Category: Criminal Procedure
388 So. 2d 1333, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17389
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 1980 | Docket: 64578369
Published
may be a subtle distinction in the language of Rule 3.300(b) where it provides for the court to “examine”
Category: Criminal Procedure
389 So. 2d 610, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4378
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1980 | Docket: 64578555
Published
recorded or oral statements made by the accused.
RULE 3.300: VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION: OATH AND EXCUSING OF
Category: Criminal Procedure
358 So. 2d 1129, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15489
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1978 | Docket: 64564554
Published
be sworn on a Monday, in accordance with Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.300, and not actually be examined for the defendant’s
Category: Criminal Procedure
279 So. 2d 376, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8007
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1973 | Docket: 64532958
Published
ruling of the trial court was eminently correct. Rule 3.300 CrPR, which deals with a challenge to the panel
Category: Criminal Procedure
268 So. 2d 557, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6041
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1972 | Docket: 64528544
Published
random from a cross-section of the community.
In Rule 3.300 CrPR, 33 F.S.A., relating to “challenge to panel”
Category: Criminal Procedure