Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.180 - PRESENCE OF DEFENDANT | Syfert Law

Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.180

RULE 3.180. PRESENCE OF DEFENDANT

(a) Presence of Defendant. In all prosecutions for crime the
defendant must be present:

(1) at first appearance;

(2) when a plea is made, unless a written plea of not
guilty has been made in writing under the provisions of rule
3.170(a);

(3) at any pretrial conference, unless the defendant’s
presence is waived in writing or on the record by the defendant or
by the defendant’s counsel with the defendant’s consent;

(4) at the beginning of the trial during the examination,
challenging, impaneling, and swearing of the jury;

(5) at all proceedings before the court when the jury is
present;
(6) when evidence is addressed to the court out of the
presence of the jury for the purpose of laying the foundation for the
introduction of evidence before the jury;

(7) at any view by the jury;

(8) at the rendition of the verdict; and

(9) at the pronouncement of judgment and the
imposition of sentence.

(b) Presence; Definition. A defendant is present for
purposes of this rule if the defendant has a meaningful opportunity
to be heard through counsel on the issues being discussed and the
defendant:

(1) is physically in attendance for the courtroom
proceeding;

(2) waives physical attendance in writing or on the
record for a proceeding that requires the defendant’s presence
under subdivision (a)(2) or (a)(9), the court accepts the wavier, and
the defendant appears by audio-video communication technology;
or

(3) appears by audio-video communication technology
for a first appearance hearing under rule 3.130.

(c) Defendant Absenting Self.

(1) Trial. If the defendant is present at the beginning of
the trial and thereafter, during the progress of the trial or before the
verdict of the jury has been returned into court, voluntarily absents
himself or herself from the presence of the court without leave of
court, or is removed from the presence of the court because of his
or her disruptive conduct during the trial, the trial of the cause or
the return of the verdict of the jury in the case shall not thereby be
postponed or delayed, but the trial, the submission of the case to
the jury for verdict, and the return of the verdict thereon shall
proceed in all respects as though the defendant were present in
court at all times.

(2) Sentencing. If the defendant is present at the
beginning of the trial and thereafter absents himself or herself as
described in subdivision (1), or if the defendant enters a plea of
guilty or no contest and thereafter absents himself or herself from
sentencing, the sentencing may proceed in all respects as though
the defendant were present at all times.

(d) Defendant May Be Tried in Absentia for
Misdemeanors. Persons prosecuted for misdemeanors may, at their
own request, by leave of court, be excused from attendance at any
or all of the proceedings aforesaid.

(e) Presence of Corporation. A corporation may appear by
counsel at all times and for all purposes.

Committee Notes

1968 Adoption. (a) The suggested rule is in great part a
recopying of section 914.01, Florida Statutes:

In (3) the words “at the beginning of the trial” are
recommended for inclusion to avoid questions arising as to the
necessity for the defendant’s presence at times other than upon
trial, such as when the jury venire is ordered, etc.

Subdivision (a)(8) is not in the present statute. However, it is
deemed advisable to include it, as the several sections of chapter
921, Florida Statutes, particularly section 921.07, appear to
impliedly or expressly require the defendant’s presence at such
times.

(c) The statute and the suggested rule make no distinction
between capital and other cases. In all probability, however, were a
person on trial for a capital case to escape during trial, a mistrial
should be ordered if such person were not captured within a
reasonable time.
(d) It is suggested that this language be used rather than the
all-inclusive general language of the present statute as to
misdemeanor cases.

(e) This provision does not appear in section 914.01, Florida
Statutes, but it is a part of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 43. It
is deemed useful to include it.

1972 Amendment. Same as prior rule except (3) added to
conform to rule 3.220(k); other subdivisions renumbered.

Cases Citing Rule 3.180

Total Results: 177

Muhammad v. State

782 So. 2d 343, 2001 WL 40365

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2001 | Docket: 2000672

Cited 152 times | Published

swearing of the jury." This Court interpreted rule 3.180(a)(4) in Coney v. State, 653 So.2d 1009, 1013

Category: Criminal Procedure

Griffin v. State

866 So. 2d 1, 2003 WL 22207901

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2004 | Docket: 1680168

Cited 133 times | Published

under any definition of "presence" encompassed by rule 3.180. He does not assert that he was physically absent

Category: Criminal Procedure

Blanco v. State

452 So. 2d 520

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1984 | Docket: 2517191

Cited 80 times | Published

trial mandating appellant's presence. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180. Appellant argues that the trial court erred

Category: Criminal Procedure

Roberts v. State

510 So. 2d 885, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 325

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1987 | Docket: 1593209

Cited 76 times | Published

error. See Meek, 487 So.2d at 1059; and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(a)(5). As Roberts' next point on appeal,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kearse v. State

770 So. 2d 1119, 2000 WL 854156

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2000 | Docket: 1778851

Cited 73 times | Published

him after he filed his written waiver. However, rule 3.180(a)(3) provides that a defendant may waive his

Category: Criminal Procedure

Coney v. State

653 So. 2d 1009, 1995 WL 2423

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1995 | Docket: 552216

Cited 72 times | Published

during the ... challenging ... of the jury. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(a). We conclude that the rule means just

Category: Criminal Procedure

Garcia v. State

492 So. 2d 360, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 251

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1986 | Docket: 478249

Cited 68 times | Published

Francis v. State, 413 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 1982); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(a). It is also true that counsel's waiver

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Ginebra

511 So. 2d 960, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 322

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1987 | Docket: 314698

Cited 62 times | Published

present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 3.180(c), the trial judge should, when determining

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harris v. State

789 So. 2d 1114, 2001 WL 692352

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2001 | Docket: 1696029

Cited 58 times | Published

the proceeding, is well established. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9); Griffin, 517 So.2d at 670 ("The pronouncement

Category: Criminal Procedure

Anderson v. State

267 So. 2d 8

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1972 | Docket: 1481702

Cited 56 times | Published

factors are sufficient to create an exception to Rule 3.180, F.R.Cr.P., requiring the presence of the defendants

Category: Criminal Procedure

Provenzano v. Dugger

561 So. 2d 541, 1990 WL 55956

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1990 | Docket: 1740208

Cited 55 times | Published

viewed as critical stages of the trial. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(a); Howard v. State, 484 So.2d 1319 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jordan v. State

143 So. 3d 335, 2014 WL 1408559

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2014 | Docket: 60293999

Cited 45 times | Published

State, 492 So.2d 360, 364 (Fla.1986). “[WJhile rule 3.180(a) determines that the involuntary absence of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Saia Motor Freight Line, Inc. v. Reid

930 So. 2d 598, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 281, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 802, 2006 WL 1278140

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2006 | Docket: 1469530

Cited 38 times | Published

180 means that a defendant has a right under rule 3.180 to be physically present at the immediate site

Category: Criminal Procedure

Herzog v. State

439 So. 2d 1372

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1983 | Docket: 2378158

Cited 36 times | Published

during a crucial stage of the trial as defined by Rule 3.180 or constitutional principles ("where fundamental

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Terry

336 So. 2d 65

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1976 | Docket: 2521736

Cited 30 times | Published

150 Rule 3.152 Rule 3.160 Rule 3.170 Rule 3.180 Rule 3.190 Rule 3.210 Rule 3.220 Rule 3

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ault v. State

53 So. 3d 175, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 527, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1631, 2010 WL 3781991

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2010 | Docket: 2407582

Cited 29 times | Published

discussion qualifies as a pretrial conference under rule 3.180, errors of this kind are subject to reversal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pomeranz v. State

703 So. 2d 465, 1997 WL 792792

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1997 | Docket: 1349402

Cited 26 times | Published

presence). In situations involving violations of rule 3.180, "it is the constitutional question of whether

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jackson v. State

767 So. 2d 1156, 2000 WL 92119

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2000 | Docket: 1661497

Cited 25 times | Published

guilt portion of a capital trial); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9) (providing that the defendant must

Category: Criminal Procedure

Capuzzo v. State

596 So. 2d 438, 1992 WL 45022

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1992 | Docket: 1707233

Cited 24 times | Published

present in court at all times. (Emphasis added.) Rule 3.180 codifies the well-established principle that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dunbar v. State

89 So. 3d 901, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 329, 2012 WL 1559762, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 884

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2012 | Docket: 60308845

Cited 22 times | Published

judgment and the imposition of sentence.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a). In this case, Dunbar was entitled to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amends. to Fl. Rules of Crim. Proc.

685 So. 2d 1253

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1996 | Docket: 1735082

Cited 22 times | Published

the proposed amendment to subdivision (b) of rule 3.180, Presence of Defendant,[2] to provide: A defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Israel v. State

837 So. 2d 381, 2002 WL 31834054

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2002 | Docket: 537523

Cited 21 times | Published

impanelling, and swearing of the jury." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(4). *387 However, when a defendant voluntarily

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lewek v. State

702 So. 2d 527, 1997 WL 656288

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1997 | Docket: 460191

Cited 20 times | Published

specifically held that the 1997 amendment to rule 3.180(b) shall not be applied retroactively. See Ellis

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Green

421 So. 2d 508

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1982 | Docket: 1372539

Cited 18 times | Published

present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 3.180(c), the trial judge should, when determining

Category: Criminal Procedure

Boyett v. State

688 So. 2d 308, 1996 WL 693616

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 1996 | Docket: 1508329

Cited 17 times | Published

first time that a defendant has a right under rule 3.180 to be physically present at the immediate *310

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lambrix v. Dugger

529 So. 2d 1110, 1988 WL 89793

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 1988 | Docket: 953829

Cited 17 times | Published

challenging, impaneling and swearing of jurors. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.180(a)(4). Second, we perceive no prejudice

Category: Criminal Procedure

Walton v. State

106 So. 3d 522, 2013 WL 500386, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2109

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2013 | Docket: 60228255

Cited 16 times | Published

328, 330 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9) (2010) (stating a defendant “shall”

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lamarca v. State

931 So. 2d 838, 2006 WL 1041050

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2006 | Docket: 2518635

Cited 16 times | Published

counsel. See id. at 1254 n. 2; see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(4), (b). The requirements of this rule

Category: Criminal Procedure

Meek v. State

487 So. 2d 1058, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 195

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1986 | Docket: 1796280

Cited 15 times | Published

himself from the courtroom in accordance with rule 3.180(b) and there was no error in instructing the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Meek v. State

487 So. 2d 1058, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 195

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1986 | Docket: 1796280

Cited 15 times | Published

himself from the courtroom in accordance with rule 3.180(b) and there was no error in instructing the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Quarterman v. State

506 So. 2d 50, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1104

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1987 | Docket: 1700353

Cited 14 times | Published

185 So.2d 202 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180. While Rule 3.180(b) makes provision for a trial to

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Baker

267 So. 2d 331

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1972 | Docket: 1740625

Cited 14 times | Published

factors are sufficient to create an exception to Rule 3.180, F.R.Cr.P., requiring the presence of the defendants

Category: Criminal Procedure

Orta v. State

919 So. 2d 602, 2006 WL 120005

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2006 | Docket: 1678514

Cited 13 times | Published

criminal proceeding, including sentencing. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9); Dougherty v. State, 785 So.2d 1221

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dougherty v. State

785 So. 2d 1221, 2001 WL 527684

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2001 | Docket: 450245

Cited 12 times | Published

defendant is entitled to be present. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9); Capuzzo v. State, 596 So.2d 438,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hayes v. State

592 So. 2d 327, 1992 WL 280

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1992 | Docket: 1428720

Cited 11 times | Published

no reason why he could not — consistent with rule 3.180 — voluntarily absent himself from trial, especially

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cruz v. State

822 So. 2d 595, 2002 WL 1877197

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2002 | Docket: 1757147

Cited 10 times | Published

pretrial conference. This being the case, under Rule 3.180(a)(3), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wilson v. State

764 So. 2d 813, 2000 WL 1022360

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2000 | Docket: 142923

Cited 10 times | Published

United States, 373 A.2d 599, 600 (D.C.1977); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(8). Discussing and responding to a jury's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Reese v. State

728 So. 2d 727, 1999 WL 73987

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1999 | Docket: 1306

Cited 9 times | Published

with the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Rule 3.180(a)(9) provides that every defendant must be present

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mejia v. State

675 So. 2d 996, 1996 WL 316536

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1996 | Docket: 1322525

Cited 9 times | Published

The court held, further, that a violation of rule 3.180(a)(4), as interpreted, is subject to a harmless

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.

606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1992 | Docket: 2191048

Cited 9 times | Published

(3e)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. RULE 3.180. PRESENCE OF DEFENDANT (a) Presence of Defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Seraphin

818 So. 2d 485, 2002 WL 992062

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2002 | Docket: 1652803

Cited 8 times | Published

present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of rule 3.180(d), the trial judge should, when determining

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

750 So. 2d 22, 1999 WL 820574

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1999 | Docket: 1426683

Cited 8 times | Published

error. In situations involving violations of rule 3.180, "it is the constitutional question of whether

Category: Criminal Procedure

Papageorge v. State

710 So. 2d 53, 1998 WL 191171

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1998 | Docket: 1444597

Cited 8 times | Published

criminal trial without leave of court. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.180(c): Capuzzo, 596 So.2d at 440. In the instant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lane v. State

459 So. 2d 1145

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1984 | Docket: 1282266

Cited 8 times | Published

Walker v. State, 438 So.2d 969 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Rule 3.180(a)(4), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Thus

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nelson v. State

724 So. 2d 1202, 1999 WL 2568

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1998 | Docket: 1409853

Cited 7 times | Published

is mandated by our criminal rules. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9); Capuzzo v. State, 596 So.2d 438 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brower v. State

684 So. 2d 1378, 1996 WL 709447

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1996 | Docket: 1482222

Cited 7 times | Published

confrontation clause. Rather than an evidentiary right, rule 3.180(a) seeks to protect the constitutional right

Category: Criminal Procedure

De Abreu v. State

593 So. 2d 233, 1991 WL 279409

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1991 | Docket: 446502

Cited 7 times | Published

present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 3.180(c), the trial judge should, when determining

Category: Criminal Procedure

Walker v. State

492 So. 2d 772, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1700

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1986 | Docket: 478441

Cited 7 times | Published

to be present at this motion hearing. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180. The state next argues that the speedy trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Asay v. Moore

828 So. 2d 985, 2002 WL 1290914

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2002 | Docket: 429932

Cited 6 times | Published

first time that a defendant has a right under rule 3.180 to be physically present at the immediate site

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carmichael v. State

715 So. 2d 247, 1998 WL 378121

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1998 | Docket: 1716948

Cited 6 times | Published

Procedure, 685 So.2d 1253, 1254 n. 2 (Fla.1996). Rule 3.180 now considers a defendant present when the defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smiley v. State

704 So. 2d 191, 1997 WL 791620

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1997 | Docket: 1354878

Cited 6 times | Published

Francis v. State, 413 So.2d 1175 (Fla.1982) (Rule 3.180(a)(4) was violated, where defense counsel, the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Matthews v. State

687 So. 2d 908, 1997 WL 30816

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1997 | Docket: 1370601

Cited 6 times | Published

impanelling and swearing of the jury. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(4).[1] Prior to 1995, the courts had

Category: Criminal Procedure

Schiffer v. State

617 So. 2d 357, 1993 WL 113342

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1993 | Docket: 1512579

Cited 6 times | Published

physically present at a probation revocation hearing. Rule 3.180(a)(9) Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure states

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jacobs v. State

567 So. 2d 16, 1990 WL 126377

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1990 | Docket: 1688517

Cited 6 times | Published

consequently fatally and fundamentally flawed. Rule 3.180(a)(9), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gelsey v. State

565 So. 2d 876, 1990 WL 117269

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 1990 | Docket: 1725939

Cited 6 times | Published

bring you proof that the car had got stolen..." Rule 3.180(a)(5), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lecroy v. State

954 So. 2d 747, 2007 WL 1264037

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 2007 | Docket: 1164731

Cited 5 times | Published

factors are sufficient to create an exception to Rule 3.180, F.R.Cr. P., requiring the presence of the defendants

Category: Criminal Procedure

Zuluaga v. State

793 So. 2d 60, 2001 WL 803410

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2001 | Docket: 838560

Cited 5 times | Published

himself from the proceedings within the meaning of rule 3.180(c), resentencing will not be required. STONE

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fruetel v. State

638 So. 2d 966, 1994 WL 203006

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1994 | Docket: 1168469

Cited 5 times | Published

proceeding where a defendant's presence is required. Rule 3.180(a)(6) mandates the presence of the defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

453 So. 2d 505

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1984 | Docket: 1651281

Cited 5 times | Published

Francis v. State, 413 So.2d 1175, 1177 (Fla. 1982). Rule 3.180(a)(5), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Green v. State

406 So. 2d 1148

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1981 | Docket: 449796

Cited 5 times | Published

present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 3.180(c), the trial judge should, when determining

Category: Criminal Procedure

De Mauro v. State

632 So. 2d 727, 1994 WL 68860

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1994 | Docket: 462696

Cited 4 times | Published

420 So.2d 417, 418 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180. As stated in Breeding v. Breeding, 515 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wagner v. State

519 So. 2d 751, 1988 WL 8089

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1988 | Docket: 2589040

Cited 4 times | Published

that public policy and a reasonable reading of rule 3.180, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, support

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bradley v. State

420 So. 2d 417

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1982 | Docket: 1306514

Cited 4 times | Published

be had without the presence of the defendant. Rule 3.180(b) provides two exceptions whereby a criminal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Charlemagne v. Guevara

183 So. 3d 1261, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1048, 2016 WL 325185

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2016 | Docket: 60252955

Cited 3 times | Published

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.180(a)(3). Rule 3.180(a)(3) provides that a defendant’s presence at

Category: Criminal Procedure

Blair v. State

25 So. 3d 46, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18720, 2009 WL 4403202

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2009 | Docket: 1194909

Cited 3 times | Published

Florida we have set forth these critical stages in rule 3.180, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Trial and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Rules of Criminal Procedure

942 So. 2d 407, 2006 WL 3229930

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2006 | Docket: 1471518

Cited 3 times | Published

amendment addresses the issue presented by Pope. Rule 3.180(c), Defendant Absenting Self, is amended by adding

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wallen v. State

932 So. 2d 493, 2006 WL 1627526

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2006 | Docket: 837367

Cited 3 times | Published

arrested and was in custody in Ohio. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9) (providing defendant shall be present

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amend. to Rule of Crim. Proc. 3.172

911 So. 2d 763, 2005 WL 2095666

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2005 | Docket: 1501198

Cited 3 times | Published

present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of rule 3.180(d), the trial judge should, when determining

Category: Criminal Procedure

Alix v. State

799 So. 2d 359, 2001 WL 1359209

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 2001 | Docket: 1278382

Cited 3 times | Published

the courtroom during resentencing. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sanders v. State

787 So. 2d 264, 2001 WL 557630

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2001 | Docket: 18165

Cited 3 times | Published

2d 1227, 1257 (11th Cir. 1982); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9) (providing for the presence of the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ganyard v. State

686 So. 2d 1361, 1996 WL 738375

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1996 | Docket: 1676014

Cited 3 times | Published

The court held, further, that a violation of rule 3.180(a)(4), as interpreted, is subject to a harmless

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jarrett v. State

654 So. 2d 973, 1995 WL 232515

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1995 | Docket: 1303550

Cited 3 times | Published

intelligent, and voluntary," id., except as provided in Rule 3.180(b). There has been no such inquiry or certification

Category: Criminal Procedure

RR v. Portesy

629 So. 2d 1059, 1994 WL 637

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1994 | Docket: 1263492

Cited 3 times | Published

567 So.2d 16 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) construing rule 3.180 to mean that a defendant's physical presence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Werner v. State

590 So. 2d 431, 1991 WL 144241

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1991 | Docket: 458315

Cited 3 times | Published

in their presence. Lastly, the requirement of Rule 3.180 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Capuzzo v. State

578 So. 2d 328, 1991 WL 41016

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 1991 | Docket: 525661

Cited 3 times | Published

to correct a mere clerical error or mistake. Rule 3.180(a) enumerates the various points in prosecutions

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morgan v. State

492 So. 2d 1072, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 441

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 1986 | Docket: 478219

Cited 3 times | Published

additional instructions. Had the court done so, rule 3.180(a)(5) would have taken effect and the defendant's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Elmer v. State

140 So. 3d 1132, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9344, 2014 WL 2781814

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2014 | Docket: 60241375

Cited 2 times | Published

Criminal Procedure 3.180. Even violations of rule 3.180 do not automatically require reversal. Instead

Category: Criminal Procedure

Albritton v. White

948 So. 2d 852, 2007 WL 258480

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2007 | Docket: 1773481

Cited 2 times | Published

was not present at arraignment. [2] See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a) ("Presence of Defendant").

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jaworski v. State

804 So. 2d 415, 2001 WL 1202771

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2001 | Docket: 751477

Cited 2 times | Published

fairness of the proceedings."). Violations of rule 3.180 are subject to harmless error analysis. See Garcia

Category: Criminal Procedure

Santeufemio v. State

745 So. 2d 1002, 1999 WL 770718

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1999 | Docket: 1689293

Cited 2 times | Published

has a constitutional right to attend. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9) (mandating that criminal defendants

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ellis v. State

696 So. 2d 904, 1997 WL 361502

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1997 | Docket: 1325889

Cited 2 times | Published

this case, "presence" has been redefined under rule 3.180, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, as being

Category: Criminal Procedure

MacK v. State

537 So. 2d 109, 1989 WL 3716

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 1989 | Docket: 1522614

Cited 2 times | Published

Francis v. State, 413 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 1982); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180. The defendant can even waive the right to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Howard v. State

484 So. 2d 1319, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 622

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1986 | Docket: 1343788

Cited 2 times | Published

not "crucial stage of the trial as defined by Rule 3.180 or constitutional principles."); Hall v. State

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morgan v. State

471 So. 2d 1336, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1574

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1985 | Docket: 1397309

Cited 2 times | Published

not "crucial stage of the trial as defined by Rule 3.180 or constitutional principles."); Hall v. State

Category: Criminal Procedure

Prado-Gonzalez v. State

468 So. 2d 991

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1985 | Docket: 1725544

Cited 2 times | Published

present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 3.180(c), the trial judge should, when determining

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ferguson v. State

460 So. 2d 573, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 28

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1984 | Docket: 1766875

Cited 2 times | Published

Ferguson's absence reflect an adjudication of guilt. Rule 3.180(a)(9) requires that the defendant be present

Category: Criminal Procedure

Florida Bar

343 So. 2d 1247, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 4116

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1977 | Docket: 64557850

Cited 2 times | Published

present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 3.180(c), the trial judge should, when determining

Category: Criminal Procedure

In RE: AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE-2018 REGULAR-CYCLE REPORT.

265 So. 3d 494

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2018 | Docket: 7982207

Cited 1 times | Published

technical changes to rule 3.172 are made. Rule 3.180 (Presence of Defendant) is amended to resolve

Category: Criminal Procedure

Markeria Roshwan Hillsman v. State of Florida

159 So. 3d 415, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4133, 2015 WL 1291854

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2015 | Docket: 2679447

Cited 1 times | Published

impanelling, and swearing of the jury.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(4). However, when a defendant voluntarily

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morris Publishing Group, LLC v. State

136 So. 3d 770, 42 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1657, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6169, 2014 WL 1665920

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2014 | Docket: 60240084

Cited 1 times | Published

challenge, if for cause.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.315. Rule 3.180 mandates a defendant’s presence "at the beginning

Category: Criminal Procedure

Canseco v. State

52 So. 3d 575, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 217, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 644, 2010 WL 1609796

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2010 | Docket: 2408940

Cited 1 times | Published

present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of rule 3.180(d), the trial judge should, when determining

Category: Criminal Procedure

Walters v. State

905 So. 2d 974, 2005 WL 1523803

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 2005 | Docket: 1765075

Cited 1 times | Published

770 So.2d 1119, 1125 (Fla.2000)(explaining that rule 3.180(a)(3) provides that a defendant may waive his

Category: Criminal Procedure

Swidzinska v. Cejas

702 So. 2d 630, 1997 WL 777323

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1997 | Docket: 460251

Cited 1 times | Published

failure to comply with discovery requests. Fla. R. Civ. P. 3.180; See also Florida Physicians Ins. Reciprocal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Chavez v. State

698 So. 2d 284, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1591

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1997 | Docket: 2585649

Cited 1 times | Published

2d at 1009. The State argues that had amended Rule 3.180(b) been applied to the original trial, no error

Category: Criminal Procedure

Aguiar v. State

633 So. 2d 557, 1994 WL 81887

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 1994 | Docket: 1296315

Cited 1 times | Published

proceeded in the defendant's absence. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(b).[1] The jury returned guilty verdicts

Category: Criminal Procedure

Herzog v. State

439 So. 2d 1372, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 3215

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1983 | Docket: 64600479

Cited 1 times | Published

during a crucial stage of the trial as defined by Rule 3.180 or constitutional principles (“where fundamental

Category: Criminal Procedure

McCrae v. State

400 So. 2d 175

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1981 | Docket: 787833

Cited 1 times | Published

defendant must be present at the resentencing. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.180(a)(9). JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED

Category: Criminal Procedure

Christopher March Renick v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2025 | Docket: 69905399

Published

and the imposition of sentence.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9). A defendant’s right to be

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brooke Nicole Mullin v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 2025 | Docket: 70513856

Published

absence from the sentencing hearing. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(c)(2) (providing that “if the defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Christopher March Renick v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2025 | Docket: 69905399

Published

and the imposition of sentence.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9). A

Category: Criminal Procedure

Malik Sands v. Sherea Green, Etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2024 | Docket: 69461088

Published

refusal to accept waiver directly contravened rule 3.180); Stout v. State, 795 So. 2d 227, 228 (Fla.

Category: Criminal Procedure

SEAY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2024 | Docket: 68517944

Published

2d 597, 600 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(c)(1) (stating that a trial may proceed

Category: Criminal Procedure

PETER ARNOLD v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2023 | Docket: 66738027

Published

3d 1183, 1187-88 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9) (“In all prosecutions for crime

Category: Criminal Procedure

JUAN CARLOS GONZALEZ v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2022 | Docket: 64435969

Published

the remote hearing without objection and while rule 3.180 was temporarily suspended, 2 Gonzalez acknowledges

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Florida Probate Rules, Florida Rules of Traffic Court, Florida Small Claims Rules, and Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 2022 | Docket: 63591315

Published

Notes [No Change] RULE 3.180. PRESENCE OF DEFENDANT (a) Presence

Category: Criminal Procedure

BRANDON OWENS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2022 | Docket: 63249378

Published

voluntary or did not result in prejudice. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(c)(2); Capuzzo v. State, 596 So. 2d 438

Category: Criminal Procedure

JAMYLIN JAMON'E BROWN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2022 | Docket: 63144898

Published

support, the state argues: [W]hile Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180 provides that a criminal defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

JAMYLIN JAMON'E BROWN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 2022 | Docket: 62218213

Published

support, the state argues: [W]hile Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180 provides that a criminal defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

DANNY MARK REYNOLDS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2021 | Docket: 59759009

Published

the return of the verdict.” Id. At the time, rule 3.180 provided for conducting a trial in absentia where

Category: Criminal Procedure

JERMAINE CLARINGTON v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 2020 | Docket: 18707239

Published

this section. Thus, to the extent that rule 3.180 requires an in-court physical presence (and by

Category: Criminal Procedure

AARON RAMON SHAW v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 2020 | Docket: 18429200

Published

adversary proceedings contrary to rule 3.180(a), the burden is on the state

Category: Criminal Procedure

GENEROSO BANOS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 2019 | Docket: 16055469

Published

writing at any pretrial conference. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(3); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.220(o)(1)

Category: Criminal Procedure

J.R., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDA

268 So. 3d 163

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2019 | Docket: 14865457

Published

law would be repugnant to the rationale behind rule 3.180, which inherently dictates that defendants cannot

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lee v. State

257 So. 3d 1132

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2018 | Docket: 8040500

Published

present and assisted by counsel”). See also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9) (providing that “the defendant shall

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure - 2018 Regular-Cycle Report

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 2018 | Docket: 7471972

Published

precedent, and an increase of judicial labor. Rule 3.180 (Presence of Defendant) is amended to resolve

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bonner v. State

242 So. 3d 501

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2018 | Docket: 64677796

Published

767 So.2d 1156, 1160 (2000) and citing Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a) ) (internal citations omitted). Likewise

Category: Criminal Procedure

Toland Jerome Bonner v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2018 | Docket: 6355436

Published

767 So. 2d 1156, 1160 (2000) and citing Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)) (internal citations omitted).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Perozo v. State

239 So. 3d 793

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2018 | Docket: 6348073

Published

appearance at any pretrial conference. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(3) (“In all prosecutions for crime the

Category: Criminal Procedure

RICARLO A. BETTY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2017 | Docket: 6244883

Published

crucial stage of adversary proceedings contrary to rule 3.180(a), the burden is on the state to show beyond

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gonzalez v. State

221 So. 3d 1225, 2017 WL 2457203, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8324

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2017 | Docket: 6070173

Published

State, 767 So.2d 1156, 1159 (Fla. 2000); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9)(providing that “the defendant shall

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure – Corrected Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2016 | Docket: 3037339

Published

present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of rule 3.180(d), the trial judge shouldmust, when determining

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure - Corrected Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2016 | Docket: 3029854

Published

present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of rule 3.180(d), the trial judge shouldmust, when determining

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

188 So. 3d 764, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 594, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2949, 2015 WL 10490032

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2015 | Docket: 3008264

Published

present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of rule 3.180(d), the trial judge shouldmust, when determining

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hilliard v. State

169 So. 3d 264, 2015 WL 4154174

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2015 | Docket: 2679110

Published

“voluntarily absents himself or herself.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(c)(1)-(2). Once a defendant appears for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tyrone Jordan v. State of Florida

143 So. 3d 335, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 212, 2014 WL 1408559, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1209

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2014 | Docket: 56795

Published

crucial stage of adversary proceedings contrary to rule 3.180(a), the burden is on the state to show beyond

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Samuels

76 So. 3d 1109, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20892, 2011 WL 6843011

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2011 | Docket: 60304170

Published

Statutes (2009). Samuels filed a motion pursuant to rule 3.180(a) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Benitez v. State

57 So. 3d 939, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4346, 2011 WL 1135451

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2011 | Docket: 60299208

Published

1987), approved, 527 So.2d 1380 (Fla.1988); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(8), (9).” Likewise in Monte v. State

Category: Criminal Procedure

Walker v. State

20 So. 3d 1001, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16131, 2009 WL 3489390

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2009 | Docket: 1177826

Published

sworn outside of his presence in violation of rule 3.180(a)(4). Walker's presence during the swearing

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.170 & 3.172

953 So. 2d 513, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 116, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 558, 2007 WL 924070

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2007 | Docket: 64850055

Published

present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of rule 3.180(d), the trial judge should, when determining

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.170 & 3.172

953 So. 2d 513, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 116, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 558, 2007 WL 924070

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2007 | Docket: 64850055

Published

present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of rule 3.180(d), the trial judge should, when determining

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.170 & 3.172

938 So. 2d 978, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2208, 2006 WL 2690141

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2006 | Docket: 64847113

Published

present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of rule 3.180(d), the trial judge should, when determining

Category: Criminal Procedure

West v. State

912 So. 2d 665, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15779, 2005 WL 2439192

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2005 | Docket: 64840650

Published

language does not apply to the trial itself. Rule 3.180 mandates a defendant’s appearance at trial. West

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

886 So. 2d 197, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 568, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 1746, 2004 WL 2248209

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2004 | Docket: 64834033

Published

received comments on the proposed amendment to rule 3.180 and on proposed new rules 3.575 and 3.995. After

Category: Criminal Procedure

May v. South Florida Water Management District

866 So. 2d 205, 2004 WL 360820

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 2004 | Docket: 64828294

Published

be had without the presence of the defendant. Rule 3.180(b) provides two exceptions whereby a criminal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tennyson v. Tennyson

840 So. 2d 377, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3475, 2003 WL 1203930

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 2003 | Docket: 64821334

Published

420 So.2d 417 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Though Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180 provides for exceptions to this general

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mulvaney v. State

831 So. 2d 777, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17764, 2002 WL 31696754

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2002 | Docket: 64819240

Published

judgment and the imposition of sentence. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(b) provides that a defendant is present

Category: Criminal Procedure

Broward County v. B & B Bail Bonds

790 So. 2d 1224, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11091, 2001 WL 883271

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2001 | Docket: 64807281

Published

which a defendant shall be present. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9). When Gore failed to appear for sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

785 So. 2d 652, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6137, 2001 WL 483914

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2001 | Docket: 64805458

Published

writing.” “In situations involving violations of rule 3.180, ‘it is the constitutional question of whether

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tarver v. State

741 So. 2d 551, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10095, 1999 WL 543212

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1999 | Docket: 64791057

Published

defendant’s presence is required by procedure. Rule 3.180(a) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hall v. State

738 So. 2d 374, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8273, 1999 WL 410314

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1999 | Docket: 64789756

Published

right to attend “any pretrial conference,” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(3), is personal to the defendant and

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Williams

731 So. 2d 635, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 119, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 2103, 1998 WL 750890

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1998 | Docket: 64787966

Published

certified the above question. 1. Amendment to Rule 3.180 . The State argues that we should answer the

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Darden

717 So. 2d 1000, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 423, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1479, 1998 WL 608235

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1998 | Docket: 64782891

Published

1, 1997 (the date the corrective amendment to rule 3.180 became effective). See State v. Mejia, 696 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lopez v. State

718 So. 2d 754, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 423, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1477, 1998 WL 608239

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1998 | Docket: 64783375

Published

1, 1997 (the date the corrective amendment to rule 3.180 became effective). See State v. Mejia, 696 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Ellis

718 So. 2d 749, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 382, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1293, 1998 WL 378435

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1998 | Docket: 64783372

Published

trial will be governed by the 1997 amendment to rule 3.180. See State v. Strasser, 445 So.2d 322, 322 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Neal v. State

713 So. 2d 1002, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 382, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1292, 1998 WL 378437

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1998 | Docket: 64781742

Published

1, 1997 (the date the corrective amendment to rule 3.180 became effective). See State v. Mejia, 696 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lee v. State

713 So. 2d 1003, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 381, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1294, 1998 WL 378442

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1998 | Docket: 64781743

Published

1, 1997 (the date the corrective amendment to rule 3.180 became effective). See State v. Mejia, 696 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Brower

713 So. 2d 1005, 1998 WL 378445

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1998 | Docket: 1732752

Published

1, 1997 (the date the corrective amendment to rule 3.180 became effective). See State v. Mejia, 696 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cotton v. State

764 So. 2d 2, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7502, 1998 WL 329441

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1998 | Docket: 64799306

Published

were-pretrial conferences as contemplated by Rule 3.180(a)(3). Even if they were, appellant’s absence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Steinard v. State

711 So. 2d 105, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4193, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 981

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1998 | Docket: 64781048

Published

but before the effective date of the change to rule 3.180(b). Nevertheless, this court has consistently

Category: Criminal Procedure

J.D. v. State

705 So. 2d 44, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13989, 1997 WL 764502

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1997 | Docket: 64778616

Published

law would be repugnant to the rationale behind rule 3.180, which inherently dictates that defendants cannot

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rogers v. State

697 So. 2d 1233, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7271, 1997 WL 353535

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1997 | Docket: 64775362

Published

1997, the effective date of the amendment to Rule 3.180(b). Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smart v. State

695 So. 2d 448, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6169, 1997 WL 291323

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1997 | Docket: 64774212

Published

time the jury is selected and empaneled. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180. The right to be present during jury selection

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hagins v. State

693 So. 2d 698, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5162, 1997 WL 249126

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1997 | Docket: 64773464

Published

during the ... challenging ... of the jury. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(a).1 We conclude that the rule means just

Category: Criminal Procedure

Garcia v. State

694 So. 2d 815, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5135, 1997 WL 249127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1997 | Docket: 64774078

Published

and to the degree prescribed by newly amended Rule 3.180(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.2 We

Category: Criminal Procedure

Haynes v. State

695 So. 2d 371, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1852, 1997 WL 91281

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1997 | Docket: 64774193

Published

the means to confer privately with his lawyer. Rule 3.180(a)(9), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pickles v. State

677 So. 2d 414, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8320, 1996 WL 434520

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1996 | Docket: 64766330

Published

for the imposition of new sentences. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(a)(9). The appellant’s convictions are affirmed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Leone v. State

643 So. 2d 1198, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10115, 1994 WL 576111

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1994 | Docket: 64751516

Published

and then entered an order denying the motion. Rule 3.180(a) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wimberly v. Spencer

634 So. 2d 1140, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3360, 1994 WL 123478

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1994 | Docket: 64747612

Published

between his right to be present at trial, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180, and his right to a speedy trial. See State

Category: Criminal Procedure

Henshaw v. State

590 So. 2d 1132, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7, 1992 WL 570

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1992 | Docket: 64664019

Published

in sentencing him in absentia. We agree. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(a)(9). Quarterman v. State, 506 So.2d 50

Category: Criminal Procedure

Summerall v. State

588 So. 2d 31, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10516, 1991 WL 211278

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1991 | Docket: 64662546

Published

1987), approved, 527 So.2d 1380 (Fla.1988); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.180(a)(8), (9). Contrary to the state’s argument

Category: Criminal Procedure

Darling v. State

577 So. 2d 677, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2933, 1991 WL 44979

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1991 | Docket: 64657910

Published

to have the benefit of counsel’s advice. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.180(a)(19). Since appellant will be afforded

Category: Criminal Procedure

Franklin v. State

553 So. 2d 362, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2803, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6872, 1989 WL 146401

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 1989 | Docket: 64646825

Published

State v. Scott, 439 So.2d 219 (Fla.1983); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.180(a)(9). We therefore reverse and remand for

Category: Criminal Procedure

McGriff v. State

553 So. 2d 232, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2651, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6500, 1989 WL 139130

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1989 | Docket: 64646764

Published

or voluntary waiver by him. He relies on Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(a)(5), which provides that the defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Luskin

552 So. 2d 942, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2531, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6062, 1989 WL 129015

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1989 | Docket: 64646560

Published

exceptions set forth in rule 3.180(b) were not applicable. Under rule 3.180(b), a criminal trial can

Category: Criminal Procedure

Moore v. State

504 So. 2d 1311, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 722, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7133

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1987 | Docket: 64626209

Published

Counsel for appellant also correctly notes that rule 3.180(a)(5), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires

Category: Criminal Procedure

Salcedo v. State

497 So. 2d 1294, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2390, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10655

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1986 | Docket: 64623224

Published

the challenging of the jury, in violation of Rule 3.180(a)(4), Fla.R.Crim.P. We reverse and remand for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Meek v. State

474 So. 2d 340, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 126, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14736

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1985 | Docket: 64613699

Published

and of F.Cr.P.R. 1.180 [predecessors to present rule 3.180], and of case law, that where a defendant absents

Category: Criminal Procedure

MacPhee v. State

471 So. 2d 670, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1619, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14831

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1985 | Docket: 64612770

Published

February 14 conferences, the trial court violated rule 3.180(a)(3). We hold, however, that the error was harmless

Category: Criminal Procedure

Miller v. State

469 So. 2d 867, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1206, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14281

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1985 | Docket: 64612238

Published

require the defendant’s presence in court. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(a). No doubt even this delay would not have

Category: Criminal Procedure

Howard v. State

457 So. 2d 1153, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2248, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15603

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 1984 | Docket: 64607536

Published

there would be no need for subsection (c) of rule 3.180 which specifies that a person who is prosecuted

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brito v. State

454 So. 2d 66, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1796, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14657

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1984 | Docket: 64606357

Published

308, 94 S.Ct. 1005, 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(a). Therefore the adjudications and sentences

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ramirez v. State

438 So. 2d 976, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24496

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1983 | Docket: 64600020

Published

State v. Melendez, 244 So.2d 137 (Fla.1971); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.180(a), (b). Affirmed.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Walker v. State

438 So. 2d 969, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22387

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1983 | Docket: 64600015

Published

of peremptory challenges, denied the request. Rule 3.180(a)(4), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Katz

438 So. 2d 80, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24299

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 1983 | Docket: 64599741

Published

required by the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Rule 3.180, which lists the proceedings requiring presence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Butler v. State

412 So. 2d 917, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19820

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1982 | Docket: 64589342

Published

appellant must be present at such resentencing, Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.180(a)(9), 3.720, unless appellant’s request

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. DuPont

399 So. 2d 438, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20071

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1981 | Docket: 64583026

Published

'sought to contest the charge. It is clear that Rule 3.180(c) only applies to Part III of the Traffic Rules

Category: Criminal Procedure

Taylor v. State

385 So. 2d 149, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17025

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1980 | Docket: 64576889

Published

before the court when the jury is present.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(a)(5). The requirement of notice to counsel

Category: Criminal Procedure