Cases Citing Rule 3.180
Total Results: 177
782 So. 2d 343, 2001 WL 40365
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2001 | Docket: 2000672
Cited 152 times | Published
swearing of the jury." This Court interpreted rule 3.180(a)(4) in Coney v. State, 653 So.2d 1009, 1013
Category: Criminal Procedure
866 So. 2d 1, 2003 WL 22207901
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2004 | Docket: 1680168
Cited 133 times | Published
under any definition of "presence" encompassed by rule 3.180. He does not assert that he was physically absent
Category: Criminal Procedure
452 So. 2d 520
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1984 | Docket: 2517191
Cited 80 times | Published
trial mandating appellant's presence. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180.
Appellant argues that the trial court erred
Category: Criminal Procedure
510 So. 2d 885, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 325
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1987 | Docket: 1593209
Cited 76 times | Published
error. See Meek, 487 So.2d at 1059; and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(a)(5).
As Roberts' next point on appeal,
Category: Criminal Procedure
770 So. 2d 1119, 2000 WL 854156
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2000 | Docket: 1778851
Cited 73 times | Published
him after he filed his written waiver. However, rule 3.180(a)(3) provides that a defendant may waive his
Category: Criminal Procedure
653 So. 2d 1009, 1995 WL 2423
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1995 | Docket: 552216
Cited 72 times | Published
during the ... challenging ... of the jury.
Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(a).
We conclude that the rule means just
Category: Criminal Procedure
492 So. 2d 360, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 251
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1986 | Docket: 478249
Cited 68 times | Published
Francis v. State, 413 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 1982); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(a). It is also true that counsel's waiver
Category: Criminal Procedure
511 So. 2d 960, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 322
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1987 | Docket: 314698
Cited 62 times | Published
present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 3.180(c), the trial judge should, when determining
Category: Criminal Procedure
789 So. 2d 1114, 2001 WL 692352
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2001 | Docket: 1696029
Cited 58 times | Published
the proceeding, is well established. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9); Griffin, 517 So.2d at 670 ("The pronouncement
Category: Criminal Procedure
267 So. 2d 8
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1972 | Docket: 1481702
Cited 56 times | Published
factors are sufficient to create an exception to Rule 3.180, F.R.Cr.P., requiring the presence of the defendants
Category: Criminal Procedure
561 So. 2d 541, 1990 WL 55956
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1990 | Docket: 1740208
Cited 55 times | Published
viewed as critical stages of the trial. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(a); Howard v. State, 484 So.2d 1319 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
143 So. 3d 335, 2014 WL 1408559
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2014 | Docket: 60293999
Cited 45 times | Published
State, 492 So.2d 360, 364 (Fla.1986). “[WJhile rule 3.180(a) determines that the involuntary absence of
Category: Criminal Procedure
930 So. 2d 598, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 281, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 802, 2006 WL 1278140
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2006 | Docket: 1469530
Cited 38 times | Published
180 means that a defendant has a right under rule 3.180 to be physically present at the immediate site
Category: Criminal Procedure
439 So. 2d 1372
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1983 | Docket: 2378158
Cited 36 times | Published
during a crucial stage of the trial as defined by Rule 3.180 or constitutional principles ("where fundamental
Category: Criminal Procedure
336 So. 2d 65
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1976 | Docket: 2521736
Cited 30 times | Published
150 Rule 3.152
Rule 3.160 Rule 3.170 Rule 3.180
Rule 3.190 Rule 3.210 Rule 3.220
Rule 3
Category: Criminal Procedure
53 So. 3d 175, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 527, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1631, 2010 WL 3781991
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2010 | Docket: 2407582
Cited 29 times | Published
discussion qualifies as a pretrial conference under rule 3.180, errors of this kind are subject to reversal
Category: Criminal Procedure
703 So. 2d 465, 1997 WL 792792
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1997 | Docket: 1349402
Cited 26 times | Published
presence).
In situations involving violations of rule 3.180, "it is the constitutional question of whether
Category: Criminal Procedure
767 So. 2d 1156, 2000 WL 92119
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2000 | Docket: 1661497
Cited 25 times | Published
guilt portion of a capital trial); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9) (providing that the defendant must
Category: Criminal Procedure
596 So. 2d 438, 1992 WL 45022
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1992 | Docket: 1707233
Cited 24 times | Published
present in court at all times.
(Emphasis added.) Rule 3.180 codifies the well-established principle that
Category: Criminal Procedure
89 So. 3d 901, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 329, 2012 WL 1559762, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 884
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2012 | Docket: 60308845
Cited 22 times | Published
judgment and the imposition of sentence.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a).
In this case, Dunbar was entitled to
Category: Criminal Procedure
685 So. 2d 1253
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1996 | Docket: 1735082
Cited 22 times | Published
the proposed amendment to subdivision (b) of rule 3.180, Presence of Defendant,[2] to provide:
A defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
837 So. 2d 381, 2002 WL 31834054
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2002 | Docket: 537523
Cited 21 times | Published
impanelling, and swearing of the jury." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(4).
*387 However, when a defendant voluntarily
Category: Criminal Procedure
702 So. 2d 527, 1997 WL 656288
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1997 | Docket: 460191
Cited 20 times | Published
specifically held that the 1997 amendment to rule 3.180(b) shall not be applied retroactively. See Ellis
Category: Criminal Procedure
421 So. 2d 508
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1982 | Docket: 1372539
Cited 18 times | Published
present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 3.180(c), the trial judge should, when determining
Category: Criminal Procedure
688 So. 2d 308, 1996 WL 693616
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 1996 | Docket: 1508329
Cited 17 times | Published
first time that a defendant has a right under rule 3.180 to be physically present at the immediate *310
Category: Criminal Procedure
529 So. 2d 1110, 1988 WL 89793
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 1988 | Docket: 953829
Cited 17 times | Published
challenging, impaneling and swearing of jurors. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.180(a)(4).
Second, we perceive no prejudice
Category: Criminal Procedure
106 So. 3d 522, 2013 WL 500386, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2109
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2013 | Docket: 60228255
Cited 16 times | Published
328, 330 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9) (2010) (stating a defendant “shall”
Category: Criminal Procedure
931 So. 2d 838, 2006 WL 1041050
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2006 | Docket: 2518635
Cited 16 times | Published
counsel. See id. at 1254 n. 2; see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(4), (b).
The requirements of this rule
Category: Criminal Procedure
487 So. 2d 1058, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 195
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1986 | Docket: 1796280
Cited 15 times | Published
himself from the courtroom in accordance with rule 3.180(b) and there was no error in instructing the
Category: Criminal Procedure
487 So. 2d 1058, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 195
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1986 | Docket: 1796280
Cited 15 times | Published
himself from the courtroom in accordance with rule 3.180(b) and there was no error in instructing the
Category: Criminal Procedure
506 So. 2d 50, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1104
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1987 | Docket: 1700353
Cited 14 times | Published
185 So.2d 202 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180. While Rule 3.180(b) makes provision for a trial to
Category: Criminal Procedure
267 So. 2d 331
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1972 | Docket: 1740625
Cited 14 times | Published
factors are sufficient to create an exception to Rule 3.180, F.R.Cr.P., requiring the presence of the defendants
Category: Criminal Procedure
919 So. 2d 602, 2006 WL 120005
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2006 | Docket: 1678514
Cited 13 times | Published
criminal proceeding, including sentencing. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9); Dougherty v. State, 785 So.2d 1221
Category: Criminal Procedure
785 So. 2d 1221, 2001 WL 527684
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2001 | Docket: 450245
Cited 12 times | Published
defendant is entitled to be present. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9); Capuzzo v. State, 596 So.2d 438,
Category: Criminal Procedure
592 So. 2d 327, 1992 WL 280
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1992 | Docket: 1428720
Cited 11 times | Published
no reason why he could not consistent with rule 3.180 voluntarily absent himself from trial, especially
Category: Criminal Procedure
822 So. 2d 595, 2002 WL 1877197
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2002 | Docket: 1757147
Cited 10 times | Published
pretrial conference. This being the case, under Rule 3.180(a)(3), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
764 So. 2d 813, 2000 WL 1022360
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2000 | Docket: 142923
Cited 10 times | Published
United States, 373 A.2d 599, 600 (D.C.1977); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(8). Discussing and responding to a jury's
Category: Criminal Procedure
728 So. 2d 727, 1999 WL 73987
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1999 | Docket: 1306
Cited 9 times | Published
with the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Rule 3.180(a)(9) provides that every defendant must be present
Category: Criminal Procedure
675 So. 2d 996, 1996 WL 316536
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1996 | Docket: 1322525
Cited 9 times | Published
The court held, further, that a violation of rule 3.180(a)(4), as interpreted, is subject to a harmless
Category: Criminal Procedure
606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1992 | Docket: 2191048
Cited 9 times | Published
(3e)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
RULE 3.180. PRESENCE OF DEFENDANT
(a) Presence of Defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
818 So. 2d 485, 2002 WL 992062
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2002 | Docket: 1652803
Cited 8 times | Published
present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of rule 3.180(d), the trial judge should, when determining
Category: Criminal Procedure
750 So. 2d 22, 1999 WL 820574
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1999 | Docket: 1426683
Cited 8 times | Published
error.
In situations involving violations of rule 3.180, "it is the constitutional question of whether
Category: Criminal Procedure
710 So. 2d 53, 1998 WL 191171
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1998 | Docket: 1444597
Cited 8 times | Published
criminal trial without leave of court. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.180(c): Capuzzo, 596 So.2d at 440.
In the instant
Category: Criminal Procedure
459 So. 2d 1145
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1984 | Docket: 1282266
Cited 8 times | Published
Walker v. State, 438 So.2d 969 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Rule 3.180(a)(4), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Thus
Category: Criminal Procedure
724 So. 2d 1202, 1999 WL 2568
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1998 | Docket: 1409853
Cited 7 times | Published
is mandated by our criminal rules. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9); Capuzzo v. State, 596 So.2d 438 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
684 So. 2d 1378, 1996 WL 709447
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1996 | Docket: 1482222
Cited 7 times | Published
confrontation clause.
Rather than an evidentiary right, rule 3.180(a) seeks to protect the constitutional right
Category: Criminal Procedure
593 So. 2d 233, 1991 WL 279409
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1991 | Docket: 446502
Cited 7 times | Published
present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 3.180(c), the trial judge should, when determining
Category: Criminal Procedure
492 So. 2d 772, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1700
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1986 | Docket: 478441
Cited 7 times | Published
to be present at this motion hearing. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180.
The state next argues that the speedy trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
828 So. 2d 985, 2002 WL 1290914
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2002 | Docket: 429932
Cited 6 times | Published
first time that a defendant has a right under rule 3.180 to be physically present at the immediate site
Category: Criminal Procedure
715 So. 2d 247, 1998 WL 378121
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1998 | Docket: 1716948
Cited 6 times | Published
Procedure, 685 So.2d 1253, 1254 n. 2 (Fla.1996). Rule 3.180 now considers a defendant present when the defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
704 So. 2d 191, 1997 WL 791620
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1997 | Docket: 1354878
Cited 6 times | Published
Francis v. State, 413 So.2d 1175 (Fla.1982) (Rule 3.180(a)(4) was violated, where defense counsel, the
Category: Criminal Procedure
687 So. 2d 908, 1997 WL 30816
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1997 | Docket: 1370601
Cited 6 times | Published
impanelling and swearing of the jury. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(4).[1] Prior to 1995, the courts had
Category: Criminal Procedure
617 So. 2d 357, 1993 WL 113342
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1993 | Docket: 1512579
Cited 6 times | Published
physically present at a probation revocation hearing. Rule 3.180(a)(9) Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure states
Category: Criminal Procedure
567 So. 2d 16, 1990 WL 126377
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1990 | Docket: 1688517
Cited 6 times | Published
consequently fatally and fundamentally flawed. Rule 3.180(a)(9), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
565 So. 2d 876, 1990 WL 117269
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 1990 | Docket: 1725939
Cited 6 times | Published
bring you proof that the car had got stolen..."
Rule 3.180(a)(5), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires
Category: Criminal Procedure
954 So. 2d 747, 2007 WL 1264037
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 2007 | Docket: 1164731
Cited 5 times | Published
factors are sufficient to create an exception to Rule 3.180, F.R.Cr. P., requiring the presence of the defendants
Category: Criminal Procedure
793 So. 2d 60, 2001 WL 803410
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2001 | Docket: 838560
Cited 5 times | Published
himself from the proceedings within the meaning of rule 3.180(c), resentencing will not be required.
STONE
Category: Criminal Procedure
638 So. 2d 966, 1994 WL 203006
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1994 | Docket: 1168469
Cited 5 times | Published
proceeding where a defendant's presence is required. Rule 3.180(a)(6) mandates the presence of the defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
453 So. 2d 505
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1984 | Docket: 1651281
Cited 5 times | Published
Francis v. State, 413 So.2d 1175, 1177 (Fla. 1982). Rule 3.180(a)(5), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
406 So. 2d 1148
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1981 | Docket: 449796
Cited 5 times | Published
present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 3.180(c), the trial judge should, when determining
Category: Criminal Procedure
632 So. 2d 727, 1994 WL 68860
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1994 | Docket: 462696
Cited 4 times | Published
420 So.2d 417, 418 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180. As stated in Breeding v. Breeding, 515 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
519 So. 2d 751, 1988 WL 8089
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1988 | Docket: 2589040
Cited 4 times | Published
that public policy and a reasonable reading of rule 3.180, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, support
Category: Criminal Procedure
420 So. 2d 417
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1982 | Docket: 1306514
Cited 4 times | Published
be had without the presence of the defendant. Rule 3.180(b) provides two exceptions whereby a criminal
Category: Criminal Procedure
183 So. 3d 1261, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1048, 2016 WL 325185
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2016 | Docket: 60252955
Cited 3 times | Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.180(a)(3). Rule 3.180(a)(3) provides that a defendant’s presence at
Category: Criminal Procedure
25 So. 3d 46, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18720, 2009 WL 4403202
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2009 | Docket: 1194909
Cited 3 times | Published
Florida we have set forth these critical stages in rule 3.180, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Trial and
Category: Criminal Procedure
942 So. 2d 407, 2006 WL 3229930
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2006 | Docket: 1471518
Cited 3 times | Published
amendment addresses the issue presented by Pope.
Rule 3.180(c), Defendant Absenting Self, is amended by adding
Category: Criminal Procedure
932 So. 2d 493, 2006 WL 1627526
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2006 | Docket: 837367
Cited 3 times | Published
arrested and was in custody in Ohio. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9) (providing defendant shall be present
Category: Criminal Procedure
911 So. 2d 763, 2005 WL 2095666
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2005 | Docket: 1501198
Cited 3 times | Published
present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of rule 3.180(d), the trial judge should, when determining
Category: Criminal Procedure
799 So. 2d 359, 2001 WL 1359209
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 2001 | Docket: 1278382
Cited 3 times | Published
the courtroom during resentencing. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9).
Category: Criminal Procedure
787 So. 2d 264, 2001 WL 557630
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2001 | Docket: 18165
Cited 3 times | Published
2d 1227, 1257 (11th Cir. 1982); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9) (providing for the presence of the
Category: Criminal Procedure
686 So. 2d 1361, 1996 WL 738375
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1996 | Docket: 1676014
Cited 3 times | Published
The court held, further, that a violation of rule 3.180(a)(4), as interpreted, is subject to a harmless
Category: Criminal Procedure
654 So. 2d 973, 1995 WL 232515
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1995 | Docket: 1303550
Cited 3 times | Published
intelligent, and voluntary," id., except as provided in Rule 3.180(b).
There has been no such inquiry or certification
Category: Criminal Procedure
629 So. 2d 1059, 1994 WL 637
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1994 | Docket: 1263492
Cited 3 times | Published
567 So.2d 16 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) construing rule 3.180 to mean that a defendant's physical presence
Category: Criminal Procedure
590 So. 2d 431, 1991 WL 144241
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1991 | Docket: 458315
Cited 3 times | Published
in their presence. Lastly, the requirement of Rule 3.180 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure that
Category: Criminal Procedure
578 So. 2d 328, 1991 WL 41016
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 1991 | Docket: 525661
Cited 3 times | Published
to correct a mere clerical error or mistake.
Rule 3.180(a) enumerates the various points in prosecutions
Category: Criminal Procedure
492 So. 2d 1072, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 441
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 1986 | Docket: 478219
Cited 3 times | Published
additional instructions. Had the court done so, rule 3.180(a)(5) would have taken effect and the defendant's
Category: Criminal Procedure
140 So. 3d 1132, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9344, 2014 WL 2781814
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2014 | Docket: 60241375
Cited 2 times | Published
Criminal Procedure 3.180. Even violations of rule 3.180 do not automatically require reversal. Instead
Category: Criminal Procedure
948 So. 2d 852, 2007 WL 258480
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2007 | Docket: 1773481
Cited 2 times | Published
was not present at arraignment.
[2] See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a) ("Presence of Defendant").
Category: Criminal Procedure
804 So. 2d 415, 2001 WL 1202771
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2001 | Docket: 751477
Cited 2 times | Published
fairness of the proceedings.").
Violations of rule 3.180 are subject to harmless error analysis. See Garcia
Category: Criminal Procedure
745 So. 2d 1002, 1999 WL 770718
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1999 | Docket: 1689293
Cited 2 times | Published
has a constitutional right to attend. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9) (mandating that criminal defendants
Category: Criminal Procedure
696 So. 2d 904, 1997 WL 361502
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1997 | Docket: 1325889
Cited 2 times | Published
this case, "presence" has been redefined under rule 3.180, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, as being
Category: Criminal Procedure
537 So. 2d 109, 1989 WL 3716
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 1989 | Docket: 1522614
Cited 2 times | Published
Francis v. State, 413 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 1982); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180. The defendant can even waive the right to
Category: Criminal Procedure
484 So. 2d 1319, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 622
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1986 | Docket: 1343788
Cited 2 times | Published
not "crucial stage of the trial as defined by Rule 3.180 or constitutional principles."); Hall v. State
Category: Criminal Procedure
471 So. 2d 1336, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1574
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1985 | Docket: 1397309
Cited 2 times | Published
not "crucial stage of the trial as defined by Rule 3.180 or constitutional principles."); Hall v. State
Category: Criminal Procedure
468 So. 2d 991
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1985 | Docket: 1725544
Cited 2 times | Published
present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 3.180(c), the trial judge should, when determining
Category: Criminal Procedure
460 So. 2d 573, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 28
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1984 | Docket: 1766875
Cited 2 times | Published
Ferguson's absence reflect an adjudication of guilt. Rule 3.180(a)(9) requires that the defendant be present
Category: Criminal Procedure
343 So. 2d 1247, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 4116
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1977 | Docket: 64557850
Cited 2 times | Published
present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 3.180(c), the trial judge should, when determining
Category: Criminal Procedure
265 So. 3d 494
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2018 | Docket: 7982207
Cited 1 times | Published
technical changes to rule 3.172 are made.
Rule 3.180 (Presence of Defendant) is amended to resolve
Category: Criminal Procedure
159 So. 3d 415, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4133, 2015 WL 1291854
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2015 | Docket: 2679447
Cited 1 times | Published
impanelling, and swearing of the jury.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(4). However, when a defendant voluntarily
Category: Criminal Procedure
136 So. 3d 770, 42 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1657, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6169, 2014 WL 1665920
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2014 | Docket: 60240084
Cited 1 times | Published
challenge, if for cause.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.315. Rule 3.180 mandates a defendant’s presence "at the beginning
Category: Criminal Procedure
52 So. 3d 575, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 217, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 644, 2010 WL 1609796
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2010 | Docket: 2408940
Cited 1 times | Published
present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of rule 3.180(d), the trial judge should, when determining
Category: Criminal Procedure
905 So. 2d 974, 2005 WL 1523803
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 2005 | Docket: 1765075
Cited 1 times | Published
770 So.2d 1119, 1125 (Fla.2000)(explaining that rule 3.180(a)(3) provides that a defendant may waive his
Category: Criminal Procedure
702 So. 2d 630, 1997 WL 777323
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1997 | Docket: 460251
Cited 1 times | Published
failure to comply with discovery requests. Fla. R. Civ. P. 3.180; See also Florida Physicians Ins. Reciprocal
Category: Criminal Procedure
698 So. 2d 284, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1591
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1997 | Docket: 2585649
Cited 1 times | Published
2d at 1009.
The State argues that had amended Rule 3.180(b) been applied to the original trial, no error
Category: Criminal Procedure
633 So. 2d 557, 1994 WL 81887
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 1994 | Docket: 1296315
Cited 1 times | Published
proceeded in the defendant's absence. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(b).[1] The jury returned guilty verdicts
Category: Criminal Procedure
439 So. 2d 1372, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 3215
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1983 | Docket: 64600479
Cited 1 times | Published
during a crucial stage of the trial as defined by Rule 3.180 or constitutional principles (“where fundamental
Category: Criminal Procedure
400 So. 2d 175
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1981 | Docket: 787833
Cited 1 times | Published
defendant must be present at the resentencing. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.180(a)(9).
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2025 | Docket: 69905399
Published
and the imposition of sentence.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9). A
defendant’s right to be
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 2025 | Docket: 70513856
Published
absence from the
sentencing hearing. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(c)(2) (providing that “if the
defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2025 | Docket: 69905399
Published
and the imposition of sentence.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9). A
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2024 | Docket: 69461088
Published
refusal to
accept waiver directly contravened rule 3.180); Stout v. State, 795 So. 2d
227, 228 (Fla.
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2024 | Docket: 68517944
Published
2d 597, 600 (Fla. 2d DCA
2006); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(c)(1) (stating that a trial may
proceed
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2023 | Docket: 66738027
Published
3d 1183,
1187-88 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9) (“In all prosecutions
for crime
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2022 | Docket: 64435969
Published
the remote hearing without objection and while rule 3.180 was temporarily
suspended, 2 Gonzalez acknowledges
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 2022 | Docket: 63591315
Published
Notes
[No Change]
RULE 3.180. PRESENCE OF DEFENDANT
(a) Presence
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2022 | Docket: 63249378
Published
voluntary or did not
result in prejudice. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(c)(2); Capuzzo v. State, 596
So. 2d 438
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2022 | Docket: 63144898
Published
support, the state argues:
[W]hile Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180 provides that a criminal
defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 2022 | Docket: 62218213
Published
support, the state argues:
[W]hile Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180 provides that a criminal
defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2021 | Docket: 59759009
Published
the return of the verdict.” Id. At the
time, rule 3.180 provided for conducting a trial in absentia where
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 2020 | Docket: 18707239
Published
this section.
Thus, to the extent that rule 3.180 requires an in-court physical presence (and
by
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 2020 | Docket: 18429200
Published
adversary
proceedings contrary to rule 3.180(a), the burden is on the
state
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 2019 | Docket: 16055469
Published
writing at any pretrial conference. See Fla. R.
Crim. P. 3.180(a)(3); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.220(o)(1)
Category: Criminal Procedure
268 So. 3d 163
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2019 | Docket: 14865457
Published
law would be
repugnant to the rationale behind rule 3.180, which inherently dictates
that defendants cannot
Category: Criminal Procedure
257 So. 3d 1132
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2018 | Docket: 8040500
Published
present and assisted by counsel”). See
also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9) (providing that “the defendant shall
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 2018 | Docket: 7471972
Published
precedent, and an increase of
judicial labor.
Rule 3.180 (Presence of Defendant) is amended to resolve
Category: Criminal Procedure
242 So. 3d 501
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2018 | Docket: 64677796
Published
767 So.2d 1156, 1160 (2000) and citing Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a) ) (internal citations omitted).
Likewise
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2018 | Docket: 6355436
Published
767 So. 2d 1156,
1160 (2000) and citing Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)) (internal
citations omitted).
Category: Criminal Procedure
239 So. 3d 793
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2018 | Docket: 6348073
Published
appearance at any pretrial conference. See
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(3) (“In all prosecutions for crime the
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2017 | Docket: 6244883
Published
crucial stage of adversary proceedings contrary to rule 3.180(a), the
burden is on the state to show beyond
Category: Criminal Procedure
221 So. 3d 1225, 2017 WL 2457203, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8324
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2017 | Docket: 6070173
Published
State, 767 So.2d 1156, 1159 (Fla. 2000); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9)(providing that “the defendant shall
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2016 | Docket: 3037339
Published
present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of rule 3.180(d), the trial judge
shouldmust, when determining
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2016 | Docket: 3029854
Published
present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of rule 3.180(d), the trial judge
shouldmust, when determining
Category: Criminal Procedure
188 So. 3d 764, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 594, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2949, 2015 WL 10490032
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2015 | Docket: 3008264
Published
present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of rule 3.180(d), the trial judge shouldmust, when determining
Category: Criminal Procedure
169 So. 3d 264, 2015 WL 4154174
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2015 | Docket: 2679110
Published
“voluntarily absents himself or herself.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(c)(1)-(2). Once a defendant appears for
Category: Criminal Procedure
143 So. 3d 335, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 212, 2014 WL 1408559, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1209
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2014 | Docket: 56795
Published
crucial stage of adversary proceedings
contrary to rule 3.180(a), the burden is on the state to show beyond
Category: Criminal Procedure
76 So. 3d 1109, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20892, 2011 WL 6843011
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2011 | Docket: 60304170
Published
Statutes (2009).
Samuels filed a motion pursuant to rule 3.180(a) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
57 So. 3d 939, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4346, 2011 WL 1135451
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2011 | Docket: 60299208
Published
1987), approved, 527 So.2d 1380 (Fla.1988); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(8), (9).” Likewise in Monte v. State
Category: Criminal Procedure
20 So. 3d 1001, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16131, 2009 WL 3489390
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2009 | Docket: 1177826
Published
sworn outside of his presence in violation of rule 3.180(a)(4). Walker's presence during the swearing
Category: Criminal Procedure
953 So. 2d 513, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 116, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 558, 2007 WL 924070
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2007 | Docket: 64850055
Published
present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of rule 3.180(d), the trial judge should, when determining
Category: Criminal Procedure
953 So. 2d 513, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 116, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 558, 2007 WL 924070
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2007 | Docket: 64850055
Published
present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of rule 3.180(d), the trial judge should, when determining
Category: Criminal Procedure
938 So. 2d 978, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2208, 2006 WL 2690141
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2006 | Docket: 64847113
Published
present for a plea, pursuant to the provisions of rule 3.180(d), the trial judge should, when determining
Category: Criminal Procedure
912 So. 2d 665, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15779, 2005 WL 2439192
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2005 | Docket: 64840650
Published
language does not apply to the trial itself. Rule 3.180 mandates a defendant’s appearance at trial.
West
Category: Criminal Procedure
886 So. 2d 197, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 568, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 1746, 2004 WL 2248209
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2004 | Docket: 64834033
Published
received comments on the proposed amendment to rule 3.180 and on proposed new rules 3.575 and 3.995. After
Category: Criminal Procedure
866 So. 2d 205, 2004 WL 360820
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 2004 | Docket: 64828294
Published
be had without the presence of the defendant. Rule 3.180(b) provides two exceptions whereby a criminal
Category: Criminal Procedure
840 So. 2d 377, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3475, 2003 WL 1203930
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 2003 | Docket: 64821334
Published
420 So.2d 417 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Though Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180 provides for exceptions to this general
Category: Criminal Procedure
831 So. 2d 777, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17764, 2002 WL 31696754
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2002 | Docket: 64819240
Published
judgment and the imposition of sentence. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(b) provides that a defendant is present
Category: Criminal Procedure
790 So. 2d 1224, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11091, 2001 WL 883271
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2001 | Docket: 64807281
Published
which a defendant shall be present. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(9).
When Gore failed to appear for sentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
785 So. 2d 652, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6137, 2001 WL 483914
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2001 | Docket: 64805458
Published
writing.” “In situations involving violations of rule 3.180, ‘it is the constitutional question of whether
Category: Criminal Procedure
741 So. 2d 551, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10095, 1999 WL 543212
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1999 | Docket: 64791057
Published
defendant’s presence is required by procedure. Rule 3.180(a) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
738 So. 2d 374, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8273, 1999 WL 410314
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1999 | Docket: 64789756
Published
right to attend “any pretrial conference,” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180(a)(3), is personal to the defendant and
Category: Criminal Procedure
731 So. 2d 635, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 119, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 2103, 1998 WL 750890
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1998 | Docket: 64787966
Published
certified the above question.
1. Amendment to Rule 3.180 .
The State argues that we should answer the
Category: Criminal Procedure
717 So. 2d 1000, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 423, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1479, 1998 WL 608235
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1998 | Docket: 64782891
Published
1, 1997 (the date the corrective amendment to rule 3.180 became effective). See State v. Mejia, 696 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
718 So. 2d 754, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 423, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1477, 1998 WL 608239
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1998 | Docket: 64783375
Published
1, 1997 (the date the corrective amendment to rule 3.180 became effective). See State v. Mejia, 696 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
718 So. 2d 749, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 382, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1293, 1998 WL 378435
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1998 | Docket: 64783372
Published
trial will be governed by the 1997 amendment to rule 3.180. See State v. Strasser, 445 So.2d 322, 322 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
713 So. 2d 1002, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 382, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1292, 1998 WL 378437
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1998 | Docket: 64781742
Published
1, 1997 (the date the corrective amendment to rule 3.180 became effective). See State v. Mejia, 696 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
713 So. 2d 1003, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 381, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1294, 1998 WL 378442
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1998 | Docket: 64781743
Published
1, 1997 (the date the corrective amendment to rule 3.180 became effective). See State v. Mejia, 696 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
713 So. 2d 1005, 1998 WL 378445
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1998 | Docket: 1732752
Published
1, 1997 (the date the corrective amendment to rule 3.180 became effective). See State v. Mejia, 696 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
764 So. 2d 2, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7502, 1998 WL 329441
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1998 | Docket: 64799306
Published
were-pretrial conferences as contemplated by Rule 3.180(a)(3). Even if they were, appellant’s absence
Category: Criminal Procedure
711 So. 2d 105, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4193, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 981
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1998 | Docket: 64781048
Published
but before the effective date of the change to rule 3.180(b). Nevertheless, this court has consistently
Category: Criminal Procedure
705 So. 2d 44, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13989, 1997 WL 764502
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1997 | Docket: 64778616
Published
law would be repugnant to the rationale behind rule 3.180, which inherently dictates that defendants cannot
Category: Criminal Procedure
697 So. 2d 1233, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7271, 1997 WL 353535
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1997 | Docket: 64775362
Published
1997, the effective date of the amendment to Rule 3.180(b). Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal
Category: Criminal Procedure
695 So. 2d 448, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6169, 1997 WL 291323
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1997 | Docket: 64774212
Published
time the jury is selected and empaneled. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180. The right to be present during jury selection
Category: Criminal Procedure
693 So. 2d 698, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5162, 1997 WL 249126
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1997 | Docket: 64773464
Published
during the ... challenging ... of the jury.
Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(a).1
We conclude that the rule means just
Category: Criminal Procedure
694 So. 2d 815, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5135, 1997 WL 249127
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1997 | Docket: 64774078
Published
and to the degree prescribed by newly amended Rule 3.180(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.2
We
Category: Criminal Procedure
695 So. 2d 371, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1852, 1997 WL 91281
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1997 | Docket: 64774193
Published
the means to confer privately with his lawyer. Rule 3.180(a)(9), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
677 So. 2d 414, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8320, 1996 WL 434520
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1996 | Docket: 64766330
Published
for the imposition of new sentences. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(a)(9). The appellant’s convictions are affirmed
Category: Criminal Procedure
643 So. 2d 1198, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10115, 1994 WL 576111
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1994 | Docket: 64751516
Published
and then entered an order denying the motion.
Rule 3.180(a) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
634 So. 2d 1140, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3360, 1994 WL 123478
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1994 | Docket: 64747612
Published
between his right to be present at trial, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180, and his right to a speedy trial. See State
Category: Criminal Procedure
590 So. 2d 1132, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7, 1992 WL 570
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1992 | Docket: 64664019
Published
in sentencing him in absentia. We agree. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(a)(9). Quarterman v. State, 506 So.2d 50
Category: Criminal Procedure
588 So. 2d 31, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10516, 1991 WL 211278
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1991 | Docket: 64662546
Published
1987), approved, 527 So.2d 1380 (Fla.1988); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.180(a)(8), (9). Contrary to the state’s argument
Category: Criminal Procedure
577 So. 2d 677, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2933, 1991 WL 44979
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1991 | Docket: 64657910
Published
to have the benefit of counsel’s advice. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.180(a)(19). Since appellant will be afforded
Category: Criminal Procedure
553 So. 2d 362, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2803, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6872, 1989 WL 146401
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 1989 | Docket: 64646825
Published
State v. Scott, 439 So.2d 219 (Fla.1983); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.180(a)(9). We therefore reverse and remand for
Category: Criminal Procedure
553 So. 2d 232, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2651, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6500, 1989 WL 139130
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1989 | Docket: 64646764
Published
or voluntary waiver by him. He relies on Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(a)(5), which provides that the defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
552 So. 2d 942, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2531, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6062, 1989 WL 129015
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1989 | Docket: 64646560
Published
exceptions set forth in rule 3.180(b) were not applicable. Under rule 3.180(b), a criminal trial can
Category: Criminal Procedure
504 So. 2d 1311, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 722, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7133
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1987 | Docket: 64626209
Published
Counsel for appellant also correctly notes that rule 3.180(a)(5), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires
Category: Criminal Procedure
497 So. 2d 1294, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2390, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10655
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1986 | Docket: 64623224
Published
the challenging of the jury, in violation of Rule 3.180(a)(4), Fla.R.Crim.P. We reverse and remand for
Category: Criminal Procedure
474 So. 2d 340, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 126, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14736
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1985 | Docket: 64613699
Published
and of F.Cr.P.R. 1.180 [predecessors to present rule 3.180], and of case law, that where a defendant absents
Category: Criminal Procedure
471 So. 2d 670, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1619, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14831
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1985 | Docket: 64612770
Published
February 14 conferences, the trial court violated rule 3.180(a)(3). We hold, however, that the error was harmless
Category: Criminal Procedure
469 So. 2d 867, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1206, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14281
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1985 | Docket: 64612238
Published
require the defendant’s presence in court. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(a). No doubt even this delay would not have
Category: Criminal Procedure
457 So. 2d 1153, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2248, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15603
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 1984 | Docket: 64607536
Published
there would be no need for subsection (c) of rule 3.180 which specifies that a person who is prosecuted
Category: Criminal Procedure
454 So. 2d 66, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1796, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14657
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1984 | Docket: 64606357
Published
308, 94 S.Ct. 1005, 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(a). Therefore the adjudications and sentences
Category: Criminal Procedure
438 So. 2d 976, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24496
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1983 | Docket: 64600020
Published
State v. Melendez, 244 So.2d 137 (Fla.1971); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.180(a), (b).
Affirmed.
Category: Criminal Procedure
438 So. 2d 969, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22387
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1983 | Docket: 64600015
Published
of peremptory challenges, denied the request.
Rule 3.180(a)(4), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
438 So. 2d 80, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24299
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 1983 | Docket: 64599741
Published
required by the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Rule 3.180, which lists the proceedings requiring presence
Category: Criminal Procedure
412 So. 2d 917, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19820
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1982 | Docket: 64589342
Published
appellant must be present at such resentencing, Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.180(a)(9), 3.720, unless appellant’s request
Category: Criminal Procedure
399 So. 2d 438, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20071
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1981 | Docket: 64583026
Published
'sought to contest the charge. It is clear that Rule 3.180(c) only applies to Part III of the Traffic Rules
Category: Criminal Procedure
385 So. 2d 149, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17025
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1980 | Docket: 64576889
Published
before the court when the jury is present.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.180(a)(5).
The requirement of notice to counsel
Category: Criminal Procedure