Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172 - ACCEPTANCE OF GUILTY OR NOLO | Syfert Law

Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172

RULE 3.172. ACCEPTANCE OF GUILTY OR NOLO
CONTENDERE PLEA


(a) Voluntariness; Factual Basis. Before accepting a plea of
guilty or nolo contendere, the trial judge shall determine that the
plea is voluntarily entered and that a factual basis for the plea
exists. Counsel for the prosecution and the defense shall assist the
trial judge in this function.

(b) Open Court. All pleas shall be taken in open court,
except that when good cause is shown a plea may be taken in
camera.

(c) Determination of Voluntariness. Except when a
defendant is not present for a plea pursuant to the provisions of
rule 3.180(d), the trial judge must, when determining voluntariness,
place the defendant under oath, address the defendant personally,
and determine on the record that he or she understands:

(1) Nature of the Charge. The nature of the charge to
which the plea is offered, the maximum possible penalty, and any
mandatory minimum penalty provided by law.

(2) Right to Representation. If not represented by an
attorney, that the defendant has the right to be represented by an
attorney at every stage of the proceeding and, if necessary, an
attorney will be appointed to represent him or her.

(3) Right to Trial By Jury and Attendant Rights. The
right to plead not guilty or to persist in that plea if it has already
been made, the right to be tried by a jury, and at that trial a
defendant has the right to the assistance of counsel, the right to
compel attendance of witnesses on his or her behalf, the right to
confront and cross-examine witnesses against him or her, and the
right not to testify or be compelled to incriminate himself or herself.

(4) Effect of Plea. Upon a plea of guilty, or nolo
contendere without express reservation of the right to appeal, he or
she gives up the right to appeal all matters relating to the judgment,
including the issue of guilt or innocence, but does not impair the
right to review by appropriate collateral attack.

(5) Waiving Right to Trial. If the defendant pleads guilty
or is adjudged guilty after a plea of nolo contendere there will not be
a further trial of any kind, so that by pleading guilty or nolo
contendere he or she waives the right to a trial.

(6) Questioning by Judge. If the defendant pleads guilty
or nolo contendere, the trial judge may ask the defendant questions
about the offense to which he or she has pleaded, and if the
defendant answers these questions under oath, on the record, and
in the presence of counsel, the answers may later be used against
him or her in a prosecution for perjury.
(7) Terms of Plea Agreement. The complete terms of any
plea agreement, including specifically all obligations the defendant
will incur as a result.

(8) Deportation Consequences.

(A) If the defendant is not a citizen of the United
States, a finding of guilt by the court, and the court’s acceptance of
the defendant’s plea of guilty or no contest, regardless of whether
adjudication of guilt has been withheld, may have the additional
consequence of changing his or her immigration status, including
deportation or removal from the United States.

(B) The court should advise the defendant to
consult with counsel if he or she needs additional information
concerning the potential deportation consequences of the plea.

(C) If the defendant has not discussed the
potential deportation consequences with his or her counsel, prior to
accepting the defendant’s plea, the court is required, upon request,
to allow a reasonable amount of time to permit the defendant to
consider the appropriateness of the plea in light of the advisement
described in this section.

(D) This admonition should be given to all
defendants in all cases, and the trial court must not require at the
time of entering a plea that the defendant disclose his or her legal
status in the United States.

(9) Sexually Violent or Sexually Motivated Offenses. If
the defendant pleads guilty or nolo contendere, and the offense to
which the defendant is pleading is a sexually violent offense or a
sexually motivated offense, or if the defendant has been previously
convicted of such an offense, the plea may subject the defendant to
involuntary civil commitment as a sexually violent predator upon
completion of his or her sentence. It shall not be necessary for the
trial judge to determine whether the present or prior offenses were
sexually motivated, as this admonition shall be given to all
defendants in all cases.
(10) Driver License Suspension or Revocation. If the
defendant pleads guilty or nolo contendere and the offense to which
the defendant is pleading is one for which automatic, mandatory
driver license suspension or revocation is required by law to be
imposed, either by the court or by a separate agency, the plea will
provide the basis for the suspension or revocation of the defendant’s
driver license.

(d) DNA Evidence Inquiry. Before accepting a defendant’s
plea of guilty or nolo contendere to a felony, the judge must inquire
whether counsel for the defense has reviewed the discovery
disclosed by the state, whether such discovery included a listing or
description of physical items of evidence, and whether counsel has
reviewed the nature of the evidence with the defendant. The judge
must then inquire of the defendant and counsel for the defendant
and the state whether physical evidence containing DNA is known
to exist that could exonerate the defendant. If no such physical
evidence is known to exist, the court may accept the defendant’s
plea and impose sentence. If such physical evidence is known to
exist, upon defendant’s motion specifying the physical evidence to
be tested, the court may postpone the proceeding and order DNA
testing.

(e) Acknowledgment by Defendant. Before the trial judge
accepts a guilty or nolo contendere plea, the judge must determine
that the defendant either:

(1) acknowledges his or her guilt; or

(2) acknowledges that he or she feels the plea to be in
his or her best interest, while maintaining his or her innocence.

(f) Proceedings of Record. The proceedings at which a
defendant pleads guilty or nolo contendere shall be of record.

(g) Withdrawal of Plea Offer or Negotiation. No plea offer
or negotiation is binding until it is accepted by the trial judge
formally after making all the inquiries, advisements, and
determinations required by this rule. Until that time, it may be
withdrawn by either party without any necessary justification.
(h) Withdrawal of Plea When Judge Does Not Concur. If
the trial judge does not concur in a tendered plea of guilty or nolo
contendere arising from negotiations, the plea may be withdrawn.

(i) Evidence. Except as otherwise provided in this rule,
evidence of an offer or a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, later
withdrawn, or of statements made in connection therewith, is not
admissible in any civil or criminal proceeding against the person
who made the plea or offer.

(j) Prejudice. Failure to follow any of the procedures in this
rule shall not render a plea void absent a showing of prejudice.

Committee Notes

1977 Adoption. New in Florida. In view of the supreme court’s
emphasis on the importance of this procedure as set forth in
Williams v. State, 316 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 1975), the committee felt it
appropriate to expand the language of former rule 3.170(j) (deleted)
and establish a separate rule. Incorporates Federal Rule of Criminal
Procedure 11(c) and allows for pleas of convenience as provided in
North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162
(1970).

(a), (b) Mandatory record of voluntariness and factual
predicate is proper responsibility of counsel as well as the court.

(c)(iv) This waiver of right to appeal is a change from the
proposed amendments to the rules of criminal procedure now
pending. A sentence if lawful is not subject to appellate review; a
judgment, however, is. The committee was of the opinion that the
proposed rule should be expanded to include a waiver of appeal
from the judgment as well as the sentence. Waivers of appeal have
been approved. United States ex rel. Amuso v. LaValle, 291 F.Supp.
383 (E.D.N.Y. 1968), aff’d 427 F.2d 328 (2d Cir. 1970); State v.
Gibson, 68 N.J. 499, 348 A.2d 769 (1975); People v. Williams, 36
N.Y.2d 829, 370 N.Y.S.2d 904, 331 N.E.2d 684 (1975).
(vii) Requires the court to explain the plea agreement to the
defendant, including conditions subsequent such as conditions of
probation.

(e) Provides a readily available record (either oral or by use
of standard forms) in all cases where a felony is charged.

(h) Rewording of federal rule 11(e)(6).

2005 Amendment. Rule 3.172(c)(9) added. See section
394.910, et seq., Fla. Stat.; and State v. Harris, 881 So. 2d 1079
(Fla. 2004).

2015 Amendment. In view of the holdings in Padilla v.
Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S. Ct. 1473 (2010), and Hernandez v.
State, 124 So. 3d 757 (Fla. 2012), the Committee felt it appropriate
to expand the requirements in subdivision (c)(8).

Cases Citing Rule 3.172

Total Results: 458

Brown v. State

376 So. 2d 382

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1979 | Docket: 96879

Cited 169 times | Published

disadvantages militating against it. [6] See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172. Cf., Reyes v. Kelly, 224 So.2d 303 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Alcorn v. State

121 So. 3d 419, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 397, 2013 WL 2631143, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1189

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2013 | Docket: 60234434

Cited 137 times | Published

formally accepted by the trial judge. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(g) (“No plea offer or negotiation is binding

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harrell v. State

894 So. 2d 935, 2005 WL 318570

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2005 | Docket: 1767702

Cited 117 times | Published

172(f) and 3.170(f). We discuss each in turn. Rule 3.172 governs the acceptance of pleas. It provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Samir M. Alim v. U.S. Attorney General

446 F.3d 1239, 2006 WL 1059322

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 24, 2006 | Docket: 116609

Cited 109 times | Published

battery in 1998. He sought to vacate his plea under Rule 3.172 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure because

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Leroux

689 So. 2d 235, 1996 WL 726870

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1996 | Docket: 1739351

Cited 105 times | Published

plea and voluntarily enters the plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c); Williams v. State, 316 So.2d 267, 271

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Green

944 So. 2d 208, 2006 WL 3025732

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 2006 | Docket: 2488791

Cited 89 times | Published

postconviction vehicle in which to raise a violation of rule 3.172(c)(8) regardless of whether the defendant is

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ashley v. State

614 So. 2d 486

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1993 | Docket: 449216

Cited 83 times | Published

he contends, violates the plain language of rule 3.172(c)(1), which requires that the defendant understand

Category: Criminal Procedure

Peart v. State

756 So. 2d 42, 2000 WL 373760

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2000 | Docket: 471329

Cited 73 times | Published

filed writs of error coram nobis to present their rule 3.172(c)(8) claims. The Third District held that the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Peart v. State

756 So. 2d 42, 2000 WL 373760

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2000 | Docket: 471329

Cited 73 times | Published

filed writs of error coram nobis to present their rule 3.172(c)(8) claims. The Third District held that the

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Ginebra

511 So. 2d 960, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 322

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1987 | Docket: 314698

Cited 62 times | Published

Pamphile, 604 F. Supp. 753 (D.V.I. 1985). [5] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c) provides; (c) Except where a defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Schoenwetter v. State

46 So. 3d 535, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 409, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1051, 2010 WL 2605961

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 2010 | Docket: 2399554

Cited 56 times | Published

prosecution under chapter 837. See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(i).[6] In order to prove deficiency under

Category: Criminal Procedure

Koenig v. State

597 So. 2d 256, 1992 WL 34696

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1992 | Docket: 1351079

Cited 53 times | Published

right to avoid compelled self-incrimination. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c). Here, the brief colloquy between the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Major v. State

814 So. 2d 424, 2002 WL 468113

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2002 | Docket: 1717831

Cited 46 times | Published

maximum possible penalty provided by law." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(1); Ashley v. State, 614 So.2d 486, 488

Category: Criminal Procedure

Abraham Wallace v. R v. Turner, Superintendent, Glades Correction Institute, and the Attorney General of Florida

695 F.2d 545, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 31398

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 14, 1983 | Docket: 27611

Cited 41 times | Published

Constitution, alleging that the court violated Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.172(a), which requires state trial judges to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Edwards v. State

393 So. 2d 597

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1981 | Docket: 1446879

Cited 40 times | Published

entry of an otherwise voluntary guilty plea. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.172(c); Michel v. United States, 507 F.2d 461

Category: Criminal Procedure

Starr Tyme, Inc. v. Cohen

659 So. 2d 1064, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 447, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1417, 1995 WL 511416

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1995 | Docket: 2484834

Cited 39 times | Published

for such a plea before it can be accepted. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.172(a). Thus, in Florida before a defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Partlow

840 So. 2d 1040, 2003 WL 359316

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2003 | Docket: 1748307

Cited 38 times | Published

to advise his client about it. Id. at 961-62. Rule 3.172(c) was later amended to require that defendants

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nixon v. Singletary

758 So. 2d 618

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2000 | Docket: 54090

Cited 38 times | Published

597 So.2d 256, 258 (Fla.1992). See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172. Because counsel's comments were the functional

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Will

645 So. 2d 91, 1994 WL 617196

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1994 | Docket: 2523566

Cited 38 times | Published

3.172 governs the acceptance of guilty pleas. Rule 3.172(i) states, "Failure to follow any of the procedures

Category: Criminal Procedure

Zambuto v. State

413 So. 2d 461

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1982 | Docket: 1344985

Cited 32 times | Published

time served. Defendant rightly contends that Rule 3.172(c)(i), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, governs

Category: Criminal Procedure

Goins v. State

672 So. 2d 30, 1996 WL 166505

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1996 | Docket: 1764029

Cited 29 times | Published

defendant has the right to withdraw the plea. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(g).[1] On the other hand, if the agreement

Category: Criminal Procedure

Simmons v. State

611 So. 2d 1250, 1992 WL 158119

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1992 | Docket: 1757385

Cited 28 times | Published

"the mandatory minimum penalty ... if any." Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(i). The state is also required to notify

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

536 So. 2d 992, 1988 WL 143602

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1988 | Docket: 2517246

Cited 27 times | Published

within thirty days of being taken into custody. Rule 3.172(c)(viii) is added to require judges presiding

Category: Criminal Procedure

Finney v. State

420 So. 2d 639

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1982 | Docket: 1306781

Cited 27 times | Published

State, 339 So.2d 714 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(g). Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Fox

659 So. 2d 1324, 1995 WL 521118

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 1995 | Docket: 1748211

Cited 26 times | Published

of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172. Rule 3.172, which governs acceptance of guilty or nolo contendere

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Kelly

999 So. 2d 1029, 2008 WL 5396701

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2008 | Docket: 465103

Cited 25 times | Published

been addressed pursuant to the requirements of Rule 3.172(c) and has expressed an understanding of the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hernandez v. State

124 So. 3d 757, 2012 WL 5869660

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2012 | Docket: 60235561

Cited 23 times | Published

warning included in the plea colloquy pursuant to rule 3.172(c)(8)3 precluded Hernandez from establishing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Daniels v. State

716 So. 2d 827, 1998 WL 537277

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 1998 | Docket: 424574

Cited 23 times | Published

maximum possible penalty provided by law." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(1); Ashley v. State, 614 So.2d 486, 488

Category: Criminal Procedure

Yesnes v. State

440 So. 2d 628

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1983 | Docket: 1429949

Cited 23 times | Published

questioning by the court, in accordance with Rule 3.172, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bentley v. State

411 So. 2d 1361

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1982 | Docket: 1326956

Cited 23 times | Published

express reservation of the right to appeal (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(iv)) a ruling denying his motion to suppress

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amends. to Fl. Rules of Crim. Proc.

685 So. 2d 1253

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1996 | Docket: 1735082

Cited 22 times | Published

papers filed in criminal cases. The amendment to rule 3.172, Acceptance of Guilty or Nolo Contendere Plea

Category: Criminal Procedure

Griffin v. State

820 So. 2d 906, 2002 WL 1066593

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 30, 2002 | Docket: 352296

Cited 21 times | Published

prejudice would also apply just as provided for by rule 3.172(i) in the context of a plea. [10] Though we

Category: Criminal Procedure

Chames v. DeMayo

972 So. 2d 850, 2007 WL 4440212

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2007 | Docket: 1650710

Cited 20 times | Published

jury trial and voluntarily waives it. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(3). The Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Iacono v. State

930 So. 2d 829, 2006 WL 1540925

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2006 | Docket: 1749565

Cited 20 times | Published

colloquy's determination of voluntariness. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c). We align ourselves with the fifth district's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Watrous v. State

793 So. 2d 6, 2001 WL 219982

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 2001 | Docket: 2031700

Cited 20 times | Published

of action that it took after Ginebra and amend rule 3.172 to require trial courts to advise defendants

Category: Criminal Procedure

Richardson v. State

706 So. 2d 1349, 1998 WL 29642

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1998 | Docket: 1682515

Cited 20 times | Published

statement violated both the Sixth Amendment and rule 3.172(h), we declared that: We also agree that Anderson

Category: Criminal Procedure

Allen v. State

463 So. 2d 351

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1985 | Docket: 1509693

Cited 20 times | Published

court having complied with the requirements of rule 3.172, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, governing

Category: Criminal Procedure

State Ex Rel. Wilhoit v. Wells

356 So. 2d 817

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1978 | Docket: 1479069

Cited 20 times | Published

he will be adjudicated guilty on that count." Rule 3.172, Fla.R.Crim.P., requires that the trial court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ey v. State

982 So. 2d 618, 2008 WL 516396

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2008 | Docket: 1664421

Cited 19 times | Published

determine whether a postconviction motion claiming a rule 3.172(c)(8) violation is timely. A motion seeking to

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Green

421 So. 2d 508

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1982 | Docket: 1372539

Cited 18 times | Published

1977). The district court based its decision on rule 3.172(c)(i) which states: (c) Except where a defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Barnes v. State

29 So. 3d 1010, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 85, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 172, 2010 WL 375049

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2010 | Docket: 1643539

Cited 17 times | Published

murder were life in prison or death. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(1)-(6). Barnes clearly acknowledged his

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nixon v. State

857 So. 2d 172, 2003 WL 21543769

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2003 | Docket: 1741162

Cited 17 times | Published

follow in making this determination. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172. My research has not revealed a case where

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Thompson

735 So. 2d 482, 1999 WL 314646

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 20, 1999 | Docket: 1728547

Cited 17 times | Published

assist the trial judge in this function." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(a). Id. at 490 n. 8.[1] The two Ashley requirements

Category: Criminal Procedure

Peart v. State

705 So. 2d 1059, 1998 WL 65445

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1998 | Docket: 1573862

Cited 17 times | Published

plea if the defendant can show prejudice. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(i). The pivotal issue before us is whether

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Coban

520 So. 2d 40, 1988 WL 10276

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1988 | Docket: 1709372

Cited 17 times | Published

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1), which rule 3.172 adopts, specifically holds that eligibility for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dydek v. State

400 So. 2d 1255

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1981 | Docket: 1677146

Cited 17 times | Published

which the defendant has entered his plea. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(a); see Williams v. State, 316 So.2d 267

Category: Criminal Procedure

Marriott v. State

605 So. 2d 985, 1992 WL 260808

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1992 | Docket: 1437748

Cited 15 times | Published

appropriate to revisit this issue in the context of rule 3.172(c)(viii). See Wallace v. P.L. Dodge Memorial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

460 So. 2d 954

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1984 | Docket: 1766649

Cited 15 times | Published

in jeopardy as if he had pled guilty. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(f); Brown v. State, 367 So.2d 616 (Fla. 1979)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Maselli v. State

446 So. 2d 1079

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1984 | Docket: 1780179

Cited 15 times | Published

and that there is a factual basis for it. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(a). There may be many reasons why a defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hernandez v. State

61 So. 3d 1144, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4787, 2011 WL 1262148

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 2011 | Docket: 60300368

Cited 14 times | Published

Padilla as a Florida court would have under our Rule 3.172(c)(8). In Flores’ case, an evidentiary hearing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gill v. State

14 So. 3d 946, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 414, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1016, 2009 WL 1954796

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2009 | Docket: 1650029

Cited 14 times | Published

determine there is a factual basis for the plea. Rule 3.172(a). This requirement was met when the trial court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Forrest v. State

988 So. 2d 38, 2008 WL 2663770

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2008 | Docket: 1385197

Cited 14 times | Published

his plea may subject him to deportation. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8). The motion attached affidavits indicating

Category: Criminal Procedure

LAD v. State

616 So. 2d 106, 1993 WL 77421

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1993 | Docket: 1368049

Cited 14 times | Published

601 So.2d 540 (Fla. 1992). The requirement of rule 3.172 and section 775.084 concerning preplea notice

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kinney v. Department of State

501 So. 2d 129, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 307

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1987 | Docket: 1527650

Cited 14 times | Published

interest, while maintaining his innocence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(d). See also Vinson v. State, 345 So.2d 711

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Carr

438 So. 2d 826

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 1983 | Docket: 1299212

Cited 14 times | Published

expressly reserve the right to an appeal. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(iv). Further, a conditional "nolo plea

Category: Criminal Procedure

United States v. Robert William Green

873 F.3d 846

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 29, 2017 | Docket: 6160941

Cited 13 times | Published

a factual basis for .the plea exists.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(a) (emphasis added); see also Starr

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Freijo

987 So. 2d 190, 2008 WL 2811745

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 2008 | Docket: 1723806

Cited 13 times | Published

based on the trial court's failure to comply with rule 3.172(c)(8), and when the rule 3.850 limitations period

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ghanavati v. State

820 So. 2d 989, 2002 WL 1285203

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2002 | Docket: 1362701

Cited 13 times | Published

respect to pleas entered prior to the change in rule 3.172. See State v. Richardson, 785 So.2d 585, 588

Category: Criminal Procedure

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. Florida (In Re Tower Environmental, Inc.)

260 B.R. 213, 14 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 229, 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 1944, 1998 WL 1757108

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 1998 | Docket: 1826078

Cited 13 times | Published

between the Debtor and the State. Additionally, Rule 3.172, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Trowell v. State

706 So. 2d 332, 1998 WL 15840

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1998 | Docket: 1280304

Cited 13 times | Published

collateral attack..." (Emphasis supplied). Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(4). In Thomas v. State, 626 So.2d 1093

Category: Criminal Procedure

Perriello v. State

684 So. 2d 258, 1996 WL 692113

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 1996 | Docket: 1740815

Cited 13 times | Published

for rev. dismissed, 613 So.2d 453 (Fla.1993). Rule 3.172(c)(8), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires

Category: Criminal Procedure

Prieto v. State

824 So. 2d 924, 2002 WL 1369605

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 2002 | Docket: 2514769

Cited 12 times | Published

the defendant failed to show prejudice, despite rule 3.172(c)(8) violation, where defendant was deportable

Category: Criminal Procedure

Prieto v. State

824 So. 2d 924, 2002 WL 1369605

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 2002 | Docket: 2514769

Cited 12 times | Published

the defendant failed to show prejudice, despite rule 3.172(c)(8) violation, where defendant was deportable

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bates v. State

818 So. 2d 626, 2002 WL 1212426

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2002 | Docket: 324750

Cited 12 times | Published

the direct consequences of his plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172.[3] In affirming on this issue, we follow

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nowlin v. State

639 So. 2d 1050, 1994 WL 328277

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 1994 | Docket: 1310611

Cited 12 times | Published

which the defendant entered his plea. See also rule 3.172(a), Fla.R.Crim.P. (trial court, *1051 before

Category: Criminal Procedure

Young v. State

616 So. 2d 1133, 1993 WL 108101

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1993 | Docket: 1726787

Cited 12 times | Published

State, 316 So.2d 267, 273-75 (Fla. 1975); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(i).[*] Affirmed. SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amlotte v. State

435 So. 2d 249

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1983 | Docket: 1328337

Cited 12 times | Published

expressly permitted under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(d). Notwithstanding Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(iv), Fla.R.App.P.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bolware v. State

995 So. 2d 268, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 645

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 2008 | Docket: 2544788

Cited 11 times | Published

and those other subjects specifically listed in rule 3.172(c). Our cases are clear that the loss of the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Echeverria v. State

949 So. 2d 331, 2007 WL 556908

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2007 | Docket: 1374384

Cited 11 times | Published

any obligations the defendant will incur. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(7). Among other things, the trial court

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Oakley

715 So. 2d 956, 1998 WL 263997

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1998 | Docket: 252007

Cited 11 times | Published

trial court erred in finding non-compliance with rule 3.172(c)(8), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. However

Category: Criminal Procedure

Blalock v. Rice

707 So. 2d 738, 1997 WL 557642

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1997 | Docket: 1675818

Cited 11 times | Published

State, 638 So.2d 1008 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(i). With no record to rebut her claim, this

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

680 So. 2d 585, 1996 WL 511547

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1996 | Docket: 1201323

Cited 11 times | Published

the charge to which the plea is offered. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(1); see Barney v. State, 636 So.2d 873

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wuornos v. State

676 So. 2d 966, 1995 WL 555302

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 1995 | Docket: 1317464

Cited 11 times | Published

better procedure is for the trial court to use rule 3.172 as a checklist during the plea colloquy, and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Polk v. State

405 So. 2d 758

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 1981 | Docket: 2511801

Cited 11 times | Published

mandatory minimum sentence prior to adoption of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(i)). That a convicted felon may not own

Category: Criminal Procedure

Whipple v. State

789 So. 2d 1132, 2001 WL 716760

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2001 | Docket: 2535894

Cited 10 times | Published

State, 614 So.2d 486 (Fla.1993)); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(1). A trial court is required to inform

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pearman v. State

764 So. 2d 739, 2000 WL 873331

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2000 | Docket: 469988

Cited 10 times | Published

that the plea is voluntarily entered. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(a). Ordinarily, the trial court should place

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hen Lin Lu v. State

683 So. 2d 1110, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12499, 1996 WL 685579

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1996 | Docket: 213797

Cited 10 times | Published

to comply with rule 3.172(c)(8), can result in prejudice to a defendant under rule 3.172(i), so as to form

Category: Criminal Procedure

Suarez v. State

616 So. 2d 1067, 1993 WL 100295

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 1993 | Docket: 1383226

Cited 10 times | Published

determining the voluntariness of a guilty plea under Rule 3.172(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Skinner v. State

399 So. 2d 1064

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1981 | Docket: 2578923

Cited 10 times | Published

of the plea. Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(b)(1); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(iv). See Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gusow v. State

6 So. 3d 699, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2944, 2009 WL 838282

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 2009 | Docket: 1213536

Cited 9 times | Published

to advise him of the potential penalties under rule 3.172(c)(1)3, but that defense counsel told him that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Saldana v. State

786 So. 2d 643, 2001 WL 609477

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2001 | Docket: 2535812

Cited 9 times | Published

that he was a potential deportee as required by rule 3.172(c)(8), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Richardson

785 So. 2d 585, 2001 WL 361759

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 2001 | Docket: 450353

Cited 9 times | Published

possible deportation consequences as required by Rule 3.172(c)(8).[4] The remaining defendant had entered

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.

606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1992 | Docket: 2191048

Cited 9 times | Published

171(d) now appears as part of new Rrule 3.172. RULE 3.172. ACCEPTANCE OF GUILTY OR NOLO CONTENDERE PLEA

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lynch v. State

2 So. 3d 47, 2008 WL 4809783

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2009 | Docket: 1643648

Cited 8 times | Published

State, 316 So.2d 267, 271-73 (Fla.1975); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(a). According to the proffer, Lynch arrived

Category: Criminal Procedure

Markland v. State

971 So. 2d 832, 2007 WL 3009962

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2007 | Docket: 1732000

Cited 8 times | Published

deportation consequences of the plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8). The defendant is a citizen of Jamaica

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Seraphin

818 So. 2d 485, 2002 WL 992062

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2002 | Docket: 1652803

Cited 8 times | Published

consistently held that the trial court's compliance with rule 3.172(c)(8) is mandatory. See Sanders v. State, 685

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Vixamar

687 So. 2d 300, 1997 WL 20532

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1997 | Docket: 1370755

Cited 8 times | Published

this was a "negotiation" within the meaning of rule 3.172(f), it is clear that it was not accepted by the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gonzalez v. State

685 So. 2d 975, 1997 WL 1244

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 1997 | Docket: 1735108

Cited 8 times | Published

necessary for an appeal from a guilty plea. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(4); Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(b). Additionally

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thompson v. State

638 So. 2d 116, 1994 WL 236537

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1994 | Docket: 1168597

Cited 8 times | Published

2d 267 (Fla. 1975)] and the plain language of rule 3.172 require that before a court may accept a guilty

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bermudez v. State

603 So. 2d 657, 1992 WL 191612

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 1992 | Docket: 1475995

Cited 8 times | Published

and where the trial court failed to comply with rule 3.172(c)(viii) to advise defendant that his plea could

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pumphrey v. State

502 So. 2d 982, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 523

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1987 | Docket: 1657780

Cited 8 times | Published

obligations the defendant will incur as a result. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(vii). The cases are clear that no additional

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harden v. State

453 So. 2d 550

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1984 | Docket: 1162310

Cited 8 times | Published

and the court made the inquiries required by Rule 3.172(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cruz v. State

437 So. 2d 692

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1983 | Docket: 1675073

Cited 8 times | Published

410 and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(h),... ." 6B Fla. Stat. Ann. at 441. Significantly, Rule 3.172(h) excludes

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cruz v. State

437 So. 2d 692

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1983 | Docket: 1675073

Cited 8 times | Published

410 and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(h),... ." 6B Fla. Stat. Ann. at 441. Significantly, Rule 3.172(h) excludes

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Wilson

395 So. 2d 520

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1981 | Docket: 1171420

Cited 8 times | Published

by saying: "That's right." The requirement of Rule 3.172(c)(i) is met when the record conclusively demonstrates

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sanchez-Torres v. State

130 So. 3d 661, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 539, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1376, 2013 WL 3333248

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2013 | Docket: 60237847

Cited 7 times | Published

a criminal charge.” Koenig, 597 So.2d at 258. Rule 3.172(c) requires the trial court to determine the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Griffin v. State

114 So. 3d 890, 2013 WL 2096350

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2013 | Docket: 60232014

Cited 7 times | Published

State, 316 So.2d 279, 280 (Fla.1975). Under rule 3.172(c), a determination of volun-tariness must be

Category: Criminal Procedure

England v. State

46 So. 3d 127, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15898, 2010 WL 4108545

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2010 | Docket: 1929149

Cited 7 times | Published

receives a plea subject to the requirements of rule 3.172 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Roberto Garces v. United States Attorney General

611 F.3d 1337, 76 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 651, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16233

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 27, 2010 | Docket: 2103406

Cited 7 times | Published

consequences. Id. at 1243; see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8). Because the state court vacated the

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

26 So. 3d 534, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 629, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1948, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 629

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 2009 | Docket: 1117422

Cited 7 times | Published

of Indigent Status; and (4) sua sponte amend rule 3.172. We have addressed the amendments to rule 3.132

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ward v. State

986 So. 2d 479, 2008 WL 150527

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2008 | Docket: 1429177

Cited 7 times | Published

predator under the Act. Id. at 765; see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(9). If a prior conviction could not be

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pena v. State

980 So. 2d 542, 2008 WL 1734527

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2008 | Docket: 1418421

Cited 7 times | Published

of rule 3.850 motions alleging a violation of rule 3.172(c)(8). Therein, the court resolved the conflict

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

971 So. 2d 212, 2008 WL 34806

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 2008 | Docket: 1446548

Cited 7 times | Published

just a few weeks after Johnson entered his plea, rule 3.172 went into effect, which states that: Except when

Category: Criminal Procedure

Montgomery v. State

821 So. 2d 464, 2002 WL 1625469

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2002 | Docket: 1236529

Cited 7 times | Published

processed by trial courts in an identical manner. Rule 3.172(a) requires the court, for both guilty and no-contest

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thornton v. State

747 So. 2d 439, 1999 WL 1191447

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1999 | Docket: 1475793

Cited 7 times | Published

minimum penalty provided by law, if any." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(1); see Daniels v. State, 716 So.2d 827

Category: Criminal Procedure

De Abreu v. State

593 So. 2d 233, 1991 WL 279409

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1991 | Docket: 446502

Cited 7 times | Published

failure to follow the procedure set forth in Rule 3.172(c)(viii). We find prejudice in the fact that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mounds v. State

526 So. 2d 1084, 1988 WL 65165

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 1988 | Docket: 174926

Cited 7 times | Published

defendant's guilty plea was accepted in violation of rule 3.172, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The record

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mancini v. State

448 So. 2d 573

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1984 | Docket: 83244

Cited 7 times | Published

charge in order to comply with the requirements of Rule 3.172(a). See Williams v. State, supra, 316 So.2d at

Category: Criminal Procedure

Campbell v. State

125 So. 3d 733, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 727, 2013 WL 5641531, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2290

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2013 | Docket: 60236060

Cited 6 times | Published

filed his motion to withdraw plea pursuant to rule 3.172(g).2 In his motion, Mr. Campbell argued that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cano v. State

112 So. 3d 646, 2013 WL 1748535, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6561

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2013 | Docket: 60231198

Cited 6 times | Published

2012). The standard “could” or “may” warning of rule 3.172(c)(8), however, can refute a claim where the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Russ v. State

73 So. 3d 178, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 527, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 2256, 2011 WL 4389041

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2011 | Docket: 60303358

Cited 6 times | Published

provide a factual basis for the plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(a). The State provided a factual basis for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ward v. State

936 So. 2d 1143, 2006 WL 2356073

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2006 | Docket: 1651032

Cited 6 times | Published

used as a basis for a Ryce Act action. Amended Rule 3.172 is consistent with our reading of the Ryce Act

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cella v. State

831 So. 2d 716, 2002 WL 31431560

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2002 | Docket: 1723014

Cited 6 times | Published

(Fla.2002) (citations omitted); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(1). Therefore, because the motion was

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wainwright v. State

704 So. 2d 511, 1997 WL 709652

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1997 | Docket: 1354387

Cited 6 times | Published

the person who made the plea or offer. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(h) (emphasis added). This Court explained

Category: Criminal Procedure

Eggers v. State

624 So. 2d 336, 1993 WL 347562

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1993 | Docket: 1517902

Cited 6 times | Published

any obligations the defendant will incur. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(7). Among other things, the trial court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Caristi v. State

578 So. 2d 769, 1991 WL 54130

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1991 | Docket: 440939

Cited 6 times | Published

170 were not satisfied; (2) the requirements of rule 3.172 were not satisfied; (3) "due to last minute plea

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

534 So. 2d 929, 1988 WL 131620

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1988 | Docket: 1707493

Cited 6 times | Published

State, 400 So.2d 1255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(a). Generally, the rule may be complied with

Category: Criminal Procedure

Howard v. State

516 So. 2d 31, 1987 WL 1897

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 1987 | Docket: 1266390

Cited 6 times | Published

not yet accepted it. We agree and reverse. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(f) provides: No plea offer or negotiation

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gamble v. State

449 So. 2d 319

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 1984 | Docket: 1325847

Cited 6 times | Published

judgment entered on a plea of guilty. See also, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(iv) and § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1981)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Waugh v. State

388 So. 2d 253

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1980 | Docket: 2575323

Cited 6 times | Published

Williams v. State, 316 So.2d 267 (Fla. 1975); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(a). Because appellant could not have been

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wilson v. State

378 So. 2d 1258

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1979 | Docket: 1795492

Cited 6 times | Published

decision was decided prior to the addition of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(i), requiring the trial judge to advise

Category: Criminal Procedure

Campbell v. State

139 So. 3d 490, 2014 WL 2536827, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8626

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2014 | Docket: 60241162

Cited 5 times | Published

including the issue of guilt or innocence. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(c)(3), (4). Campbell noted that the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

United States v. Pedro Diaz-Calderone

716 F.3d 1345, 2013 WL 2247985

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 23, 2013 | Docket: 1091133

Cited 5 times | Published

125 S.Ct. at 1263). 27 . Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(e) ("Before the trial judge accepts a guilty

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tasker v. State

48 So. 3d 798, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 658, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1936, 2010 WL 4483514

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2010 | Docket: 60296624

Cited 5 times | Published

entered into the negotiation voluntarily. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172. In order to make a voluntariness determination

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure

26 So. 3d 552, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 671, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 2066, 2009 WL 4841088

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2009 | Docket: 1116291

Cited 5 times | Published

conform them to their counterpart adult criminal rule 3.172. . Puritz & Crawford, supra note 4, at 66.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Buton v. State

995 So. 2d 1130, 2008 WL 5070452

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 2008 | Docket: 1285561

Cited 5 times | Published

conviction could subject him to deportation. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8). Buton alleged he would not have entered

Category: Criminal Procedure

Calabro v. State

995 So. 2d 307, 2008 WL 4277295

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 2008 | Docket: 1184105

Cited 5 times | Published

inadmissible under section 90.410, Florida Statutes, and rule 3.172(h) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. De Armas

988 So. 2d 156, 2008 WL 2986490

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2008 | Docket: 1385182

Cited 5 times | Published

immigration consequences of his plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8) (requiring a judge to give a defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ford v. State

753 So. 2d 595, 2000 WL 159181

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2000 | Docket: 1728974

Cited 5 times | Published

establish prejudice or manifest injustice following Rule 3.172. Peart, 705 So.2d at 1063; Fox, 659 So.2d at

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sanders v. State

685 So. 2d 1385

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1997 | Docket: 2568775

Cited 5 times | Published

inquiry regarding his citizenship. Compliance with rule 3.172(c)(8) is mandatory, thus the rule contemplates

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wilcox v. State

638 So. 2d 527, 1994 WL 156783

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1994 | Docket: 1652735

Cited 5 times | Published

267, 271 (Fla. 1975)] and the plain language of rule 3.172 require that before a court may accept a guilty

Category: Criminal Procedure

Russell v. State

614 So. 2d 605, 1993 WL 43868

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1993 | Docket: 1509818

Cited 5 times | Published

constituted plea negotiations made inadmissible by rule 3.172(h), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Bowland

604 So. 2d 556, 1992 WL 206418

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 1992 | Docket: 1686520

Cited 5 times | Published

party without any necessary justification. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(f). Because of the above, this case is reversed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hughes v. State

565 So. 2d 354, 1990 WL 98459

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1990 | Docket: 1403845

Cited 5 times | Published

constitute waiver of the right to appeal, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(iv), are nevertheless filing pro se notices

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gore v. State

552 So. 2d 1185, 1989 WL 143441

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 1989 | Docket: 2578740

Cited 5 times | Published

428 So.2d 369 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Although Rule 3.172, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires

Category: Criminal Procedure

Everett v. State

535 So. 2d 667, 1988 WL 137180

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1988 | Docket: 1305963

Cited 5 times | Published

receives a plea subject to the requirements of rule 3.172 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jefferson v. State

515 So. 2d 407, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2634

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1987 | Docket: 1749229

Cited 5 times | Published

probation could be added to his incarceration. Under Rule 3.172(c)(vii), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

McGinty v. State

463 So. 2d 495, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 371

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1985 | Docket: 448896

Cited 5 times | Published

Pursuant to section 924.06(3), Florida Statutes, Rule 3.172(c)(iv), Fla.R.Crim.P., and Rule 9.140(b)(1),

Category: Criminal Procedure

Landrum v. State

430 So. 2d 549

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1983 | Docket: 446017

Cited 5 times | Published

chapter 837 [the perjury statute]. See also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(h). The foregoing version of section 90.410

Category: Criminal Procedure

Green v. State

406 So. 2d 1148

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1981 | Docket: 449796

Cited 5 times | Published

sentence. Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 3.172(c)(i) specifically provides that: Except where

Category: Criminal Procedure

Roger Dennis Churchill, Jr. v. State of Florida

219 So. 3d 14, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 451, 2017 WL 1366987, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 829

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2017 | Docket: 4684619

Cited 4 times | Published

review dismissed, 727 So.2d 905 (Fla. 1999); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(g) (recognizing that a plea agreement is

Category: Criminal Procedure

Flores v. State

57 So. 3d 218, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10335, 2010 WL 2882465

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 2010 | Docket: 60298969

Cited 4 times | Published

con-*219vietion may result in deportation. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8) (requiring court to verify before

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.172 & 3.985 & Amendments to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.985

20 So. 3d 376, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 558, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1664, 2009 WL 3126373

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2009 | Docket: 1177558

Cited 4 times | Published

Jury Instructions. The proposed amendment to rule 3.172 derived from this Court's decision in Bolware

Category: Criminal Procedure

Prieto v. State

989 So. 2d 688, 2008 WL 2907973

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2008 | Docket: 1665182

Cited 4 times | Published

consequences related to the plea, as required under rule 3.172(c)(8). The lower court denied relief based on

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ventura v. State

977 So. 2d 794, 2008 WL 900304

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 2008 | Docket: 1529620

Cited 4 times | Published

may subject him to deportation, in violation of rule 3.172(c)(8). He alleged that his primary language is

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bass v. State

932 So. 2d 1170, 2006 WL 1791700

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2006 | Docket: 1285485

Cited 4 times | Published

keep on the table. Besides the plain language of rule 3.172(f) cited above, pure speculation cannot be a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Aparicio v. State

893 So. 2d 630, 2005 WL 293018

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2005 | Docket: 1378531

Cited 4 times | Published

subjecting himself to deportation. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8). Aparicio was *631 thereafter sentenced

Category: Criminal Procedure

Green v. State

895 So. 2d 441, 2005 WL 156724

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 2005 | Docket: 1674243

Cited 4 times | Published

. to obtain postconviction relief based on a rule 3.172(c)(8) violation, the defendant had to prove that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hinds v. State

726 So. 2d 812, 1999 WL 22365

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1999 | Docket: 1711556

Cited 4 times | Published

ramifications of a plea were set forth. Pursuant to Rule 3.172(c)(8), all defendants who plead guilty or nolo

Category: Criminal Procedure

Medina v. State

711 So. 2d 256, 1998 WL 281751

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1998 | Docket: 1337599

Cited 4 times | Published

that for pleas entered after the adoption of Rule 3.172(c)(8), coram nobis is not available for a failure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

661 So. 2d 95, 1995 WL 521091

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 1995 | Docket: 1526490

Cited 4 times | Published

his plea was brought pursuant to rule 3.170 and rule 3.172 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Rule

Category: Criminal Procedure

Watson v. State

667 So. 2d 242, 1995 WL 497003

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1995 | Docket: 144227

Cited 4 times | Published

appellant understood any of the matters listed in Rule 3.172(c) before the trial court accepted the pleas

Category: Criminal Procedure

Keith v. State

582 So. 2d 1200, 1991 WL 109696

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1991 | Docket: 1363405

Cited 4 times | Published

possible sentence he could receive, contrary to rule 3.172(c), and failed to inform him that the court was

Category: Criminal Procedure

Casmay v. State

569 So. 2d 1351, 1990 WL 175753

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1990 | Docket: 1190782

Cited 4 times | Published

see fully justifies such a departure. See Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.172(c)(vii). Affirmed. BARKDULL, J., concurs

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Caudle

504 So. 2d 419, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 505

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1987 | Docket: 453569

Cited 4 times | Published

waiver." (Emphasis added). Id. at 362. Noting that rule 3.172(i) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Shell v. State

501 So. 2d 1334, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 218

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1987 | Docket: 1527705

Cited 4 times | Published

told of and understood his rights as required by rule 3.172 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, or

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

468 So. 2d 253, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 498

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1985 | Docket: 1402265

Cited 4 times | Published

did not reserve the right to appeal. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(iv). If defense counsel had filed a statement

Category: Criminal Procedure

Maselli v. State

425 So. 2d 176

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1983 | Docket: 1182400

Cited 4 times | Published

and that there is a factual basis for it. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(a). There may be many reasons why a defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Reasbeck

359 So. 2d 564

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1978 | Docket: 1735697

Cited 4 times | Published

At issue is Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(g)[1] and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(f)[2] as they are applied to the facts as

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bass v. State

147 So. 3d 1033, 2014 WL 4086496, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12738

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2014 | Docket: 60243058

Cited 3 times | Published

plead, as contemplated by section 90.410 and rule 3.172(i). *1036Moreover, it is apparent from the context

Category: Criminal Procedure

Marshall v. State

983 So. 2d 680, 2008 WL 2283774

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2008 | Docket: 1669425

Cited 3 times | Published

trial court of deportation consequences. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8) (amended effective January 1, 1989)

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Haddad

950 So. 2d 434, 2007 WL 216301

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2007 | Docket: 1501294

Cited 3 times | Published

effect of the trial court's ruling is to apply rule 3.172(c)(8), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,[1]

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lescher v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY

946 So. 2d 1140, 2006 WL 3733197

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2006 | Docket: 1770991

Cited 3 times | Published

maximum possible penalty provided by law." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(1); Ashley v. State, 614 So.2d 486, 488

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mungen v. State

932 So. 2d 1229, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1840

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2006 | Docket: 2578472

Cited 3 times | Published

proceeding and to voluntarily plead. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c) ("Except when the defendant is not present

Category: Criminal Procedure

Leach v. State

914 So. 2d 519, 2005 WL 3116102

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 2005 | Docket: 1781716

Cited 3 times | Published

including the issue of guilt or innocence." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(4). No Florida rule of criminal procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amend. to Rule of Crim. Proc. 3.172

911 So. 2d 763, 2005 WL 2095666

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2005 | Docket: 1501198

Cited 3 times | Published

Committee to consider the need for an amendment to rule 3.172(c), "Determination of Voluntariness," that would

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wagner v. State

895 So. 2d 453, 2005 WL 263770

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2005 | Docket: 1674358

Cited 3 times | Published

that complied with all of the requirements of rule 3.172(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Specifically

Category: Criminal Procedure

Grizzard v. State

881 So. 2d 673, 2004 WL 1908110

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2004 | Docket: 1466234

Cited 3 times | Published

factual basis for the plea exists. See Fla. R. Crim P. 3.172. There may be many reasons why a defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Anderson

821 So. 2d 1206, 2002 WL 1723378

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2002 | Docket: 1235757

Cited 3 times | Published

ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur. NOTES [1] See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8) (effective Jan. 1, 1989). [2] 8 U

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pettis v. State

803 So. 2d 903, 2002 WL 15400

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2002 | Docket: 1785368

Cited 3 times | Published

the plea voluntarily entered in accordance with rule 3.172(c). We conclude that jeopardy attached when the

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Paniagua

789 So. 2d 1199, 2001 WL 804433

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2001 | Docket: 2548301

Cited 3 times | Published

defendant entered his plea two years before rule 3.172(c)(8), which requires the trial court to inform

Category: Criminal Procedure

Labady v. State

783 So. 2d 275, 2001 WL 20790

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 2001 | Docket: 1259642

Cited 3 times | Published

assumption is not enough to comply with the mandate of Rule 3.172(c)(8). Cf. State v. Luders, 768 So.2d 440 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cuevas v. State

770 So. 2d 703, 2000 WL 1505115

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2000 | Docket: 1778824

Cited 3 times | Published

1995)(noting that failure to follow procedures of rule 3.172 shall not render a plea void absent a showing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gray v. State

774 So. 2d 30, 2000 WL 1409680

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2000 | Docket: 1330962

Cited 3 times | Published

confirms Gray did not receive the notice required by rule 3.172. The trial court denied the motion, finding it

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Litton

736 So. 2d 91, 1999 WL 371382

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1999 | Docket: 1418712

Cited 3 times | Published

the consequences of his guilty plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(1). Thus, we remand this case to provide

Category: Criminal Procedure

Golden v. State

703 So. 2d 1207, 1997 WL 795540

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1997 | Docket: 1348755

Cited 3 times | Published

at the plea hearing in accordance with Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172 (requiring the trial court, with the assistance

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Parisi

660 So. 2d 372, 1995 WL 540278

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1995 | Docket: 1755808

Cited 3 times | Published

So.2d 1336 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); see also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172 (1995). Parisi is correct that the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Franklin v. State

645 So. 2d 166, 1994 WL 655896

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1994 | Docket: 1654580

Cited 3 times | Published

guilty plea before it is accepted is set out in rule 3.172(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure which

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodriguez v. State

622 So. 2d 1084, 1993 WL 288645

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 1993 | Docket: 1528946

Cited 3 times | Published

(Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(4); § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1991). Florida

Category: Criminal Procedure

Turner v. State

616 So. 2d 194, 1993 WL 107977

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1993 | Docket: 533260

Cited 3 times | Published

guilty to first-degree murder as required by Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.172(f), and (2) the defendant, prior to sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Goodwin v. State

598 So. 2d 295, 1992 WL 102453

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1992 | Docket: 335247

Cited 3 times | Published

that there is a factual basis for the plea... ." Rule 3.172(a) is to the same effect. The record in this

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

585 So. 2d 350, 1991 WL 147680

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1991 | Docket: 1688613

Cited 3 times | Published

carried out its responsibility as mandated by rule 3.172(c)(i), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, in

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mickens v. State

562 So. 2d 856, 1990 WL 85428

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 1990 | Docket: 1674680

Cited 3 times | Published

addressed him regarding the matters set forth in Rule 3.172(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, except

Category: Criminal Procedure

Annechino v. State

557 So. 2d 915, 1990 WL 20118

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1990 | Docket: 1512258

Cited 3 times | Published

waiving his right to counsel when he pled guilty. Rule 3.172, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Simmons v. State

489 So. 2d 43, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 413

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1986 | Docket: 1528901

Cited 3 times | Published

provided by law for the offense charged. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(i); State v. Wilson, 395 So.2d 520 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Laury

397 So. 2d 960

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1981 | Docket: 1357098

Cited 3 times | Published

express reservation of right of appeal. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(iv). [3] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.171(b)(1). [4]

Category: Criminal Procedure

State Ex Rel. Schieres v. Nimmons

364 So. 2d 1262

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 1978 | Docket: 461776

Cited 3 times | Published

changes that have taken place since it [Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(a)] was decided, however, is of no consequences

Category: Criminal Procedure

Neal v. State

142 So. 3d 883, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7598, 2014 WL 2086938

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2014 | Docket: 60242230

Cited 2 times | Published

con-tendere plea comported with all the requirements of rule 3.172. The trial court considered the State’s factual

Category: Criminal Procedure

Baxter v. State

127 So. 3d 726, 2013 WL 6171262, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18793

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 2013 | Docket: 60236842

Cited 2 times | Published

since it was not a party. The inapplicability of rule 3.172(g), however, does not dispose of this issue.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hamil v. State

106 So. 3d 495, 2013 WL 163459, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 572

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2013 | Docket: 60228220

Cited 2 times | Published

entered into the plea voluntarily. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c). This court has recognized that the “trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Alfonso v. State

35 So. 3d 978, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6541, 2010 WL 1875609

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 2010 | Docket: 1646474

Cited 2 times | Published

deportation consequences of his plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8). The trial court denied the defendant’s

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harris v. State

32 So. 3d 197, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5286, 2010 WL 1565017

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 2010 | Docket: 1197195

Cited 2 times | Published

888, 890 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(j) (requiring showing of prejudice). Harris'

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cox v. State

35 So. 3d 47, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4865, 2010 WL 1444890

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2010 | Docket: 1646038

Cited 2 times | Published

majority opinion. What is now subdivision (g) of rule 3.172 was originally adopted as subdivision (f) in

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Sinclair

995 So. 2d 621, 2008 WL 5156467

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2008 | Docket: 1285503

Cited 2 times | Published

hearing transcript will demonstrate a violation of rule 3.172(c)(8). Absent conclusive evidence of a violation

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Sion

942 So. 2d 934, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19069, 2006 WL 3302546

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2006 | Docket: 64848014

Cited 2 times | Published

and that there is a factual basis for it. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(a). The main purpose for ascertaining a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

924 So. 2d 897, 2006 WL 617532

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2006 | Docket: 1736083

Cited 2 times | Published

Ginebra, 511 So.2d 960, 961 n. 5 (Fla.1987) (citing rule 3.172(c) which requires a trial court to ensure that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Perry v. State

900 So. 2d 755, 2005 WL 1026736

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2005 | Docket: 463265

Cited 2 times | Published

State, 597 So.2d 256, 258 (Fla.1992): "The rule [rule 3.172] specifically provides that a trial judge should

Category: Criminal Procedure

James v. State

886 So. 2d 1032, 2004 WL 2534235

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2004 | Docket: 1380442

Cited 2 times | Published

Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172(a). However, Rule 3.172(i) provides that "[f]ailure to follow any of

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Lindo

863 So. 2d 1237, 2003 WL 23094844

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2003 | Docket: 1432218

Cited 2 times | Published

Criminal Procedure 3.850 applies to claims alleging rule 3.172(c)(8) violations and, if so, at what point does

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Bolware

999 So. 2d 660, 2003 WL 22460271

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 2003 | Docket: 464704

Cited 2 times | Published

under Ashley and a `penalty' contemplated by Rule 3.172(c)(1)," but in Major v. State, 814 So.2d 424

Category: Criminal Procedure

Alexis v. State

845 So. 2d 262, 2003 WL 21033816

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2003 | Docket: 159904

Cited 2 times | Published

possibility of deportation is insufficient to satisfy rule 3.172(c)(8). However, Alexis is not entitled to relief

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davis v. State

842 So. 2d 989, 2003 WL 1872312

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 2003 | Docket: 1730562

Cited 2 times | Published

(emphasis added)); Richardson, 706 So.2d at 1355-56 ("Rule 3.172(h) and section 90.410, Florida Statutes (1991)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Partlow v. State

813 So. 2d 999, 2002 WL 429073

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2002 | Docket: 1403084

Cited 2 times | Published

of guilty to be withdrawn..."). [2] See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(a) ("Before accepting a plea of guilty or

Category: Criminal Procedure

Curiel v. State

795 So. 2d 180, 2001 WL 1093032

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 2001 | Docket: 1156149

Cited 2 times | Published

deportation consequences of this plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8). The State's answer to this claim

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Gonzalez

787 So. 2d 917, 2001 WL 514189

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2001 | Docket: 2573099

Cited 2 times | Published

motion. The State's appeal follows. Pursuant to Rule 3.172(c)(8), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Benelhocine v. State

787 So. 2d 38, 2001 WL 166847

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2001 | Docket: 1496175

Cited 2 times | Published

Peart. To be entitled to relief on a violation of rule 3.172(c)(8), the defendant must "prove that the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Joseph v. State

782 So. 2d 895, 2001 WL 120150

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2001 | Docket: 456467

Cited 2 times | Published

alone, sufficient to demonstrate compliance with rule 3.172(c)(8). See Hen Lin Lu v. State, 683 So.2d 1110

Category: Criminal Procedure

St. Preux v. State

769 So. 2d 1116, 2000 WL 1468572

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2000 | Docket: 1476326

Cited 2 times | Published

the proper vehicle for a defendant to allege a rule 3.172(c)(8) violation. See Peart, 756 So.2d at 45.

Category: Criminal Procedure

McCray v. State

760 So. 2d 988, 2000 WL 731912

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2000 | Docket: 1324935

Cited 2 times | Published

trial. See § 90.410, Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(h). In Russell v. State, 614 So.2d 605 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Elharda v. State

775 So. 2d 321, 2000 WL 725034

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2000 | Docket: 1197731

Cited 2 times | Published

deportation consequences of his plea, as required by rule 3.172(c)(8), was "invited" by Elharda's affirmative

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Gitto

731 So. 2d 686, 1998 WL 335787

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1999 | Docket: 1409283

Cited 2 times | Published

Bargaining, 76 Colum. L.Rev. 1059 (1976); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(a). While the judiciary has the power to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Buell v. State

704 So. 2d 552, 1997 WL 309879

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1997 | Docket: 2517989

Cited 2 times | Published

subsection of the rule, as the dissent contends. Under Rule 3.172(c), the trial judge "shall determine" that the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harris v. State

660 So. 2d 409, 1995 WL 552382

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1995 | Docket: 1637072

Cited 2 times | Published

degree felony due to use of a deadly weapon, Rule 3.172(c)(i), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, governing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rigabar v. Broome

658 So. 2d 1038, 1995 WL 144131

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 1995 | Docket: 1525092

Cited 2 times | Published

The discretion reposed in the trial judge under rule 3.172 is to determine the elements of an acceptable

Category: Criminal Procedure

Demartine v. State

647 So. 2d 900, 1994 WL 655319

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1994 | Docket: 2551973

Cited 2 times | Published

the meaning of formal acceptance as found in rule 3.172(f): We therefore hold that formal acceptance

Category: Criminal Procedure

Demartine v. State

647 So. 2d 900, 1994 WL 655319

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1994 | Docket: 2551973

Cited 2 times | Published

the meaning of formal acceptance as found in rule 3.172(f): We therefore hold that formal acceptance

Category: Criminal Procedure

Byrd v. State

643 So. 2d 1209, 1994 WL 577386

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 1994 | Docket: 1493479

Cited 2 times | Published

State, 614 So.2d 486, 488 (Fla. 1993). See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(1); Green v. State, 406 So.2d 1148 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Freber v. State

638 So. 2d 140, 1994 WL 246473

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 1994 | Docket: 1168914

Cited 2 times | Published

v. State, 616 So.2d 109 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Rule 3.172(a), Fla.R.Crim.P. See also Koenig v. State, 597

Category: Criminal Procedure

Baker v. State

620 So. 2d 1122, 1993 WL 242657

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1993 | Docket: 1722694

Cited 2 times | Published

basis therefor, i.e., that a gun was used. See Rule 3.172(a), Fla.R.Crim.P. (before accepting a plea of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

616 So. 2d 1137, 1993 WL 113304

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1993 | Docket: 1385428

Cited 2 times | Published

habitual violent felony offender as required by rule 3.172(c)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Since

Category: Criminal Procedure

Perez v. State

596 So. 2d 487, 1992 WL 57145

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1992 | Docket: 1358721

Cited 2 times | Published

have allowed the plea to be withdrawn. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(g). Jenkins v. State, 549 So.2d 247 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fuller v. State

578 So. 2d 887, 1991 WL 70855

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1991 | Docket: 441006

Cited 2 times | Published

defendant, the trial court's failure to adhere to rule 3.172 is an insufficient basis for reversal. Fitzpatrick

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hoover v. State

511 So. 2d 629, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1755

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1987 | Docket: 1338821

Cited 2 times | Published

the plea. The court noted the requirement of rule 3.172(a) that the trial court "receive in the record

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stanley v. State

501 So. 2d 90, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 264

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1987 | Docket: 1527728

Cited 2 times | Published

sentence in accordance with the bargain. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(g); Davis v. State, 308 So.2d 27 (Fla. 1975);

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cappetta v. State

380 So. 2d 1303

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1980 | Docket: 1725745

Cited 2 times | Published

000 is revoked. Reversed. NOTES [1] See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(C)(iv).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Florida Bar

343 So. 2d 1247, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 4116

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1977 | Docket: 64557850

Cited 2 times | Published

Rule 3.171(d) now appears as part of new Rule 3.172. RULE 3.172. ACCEPTANCE OF GUILTY OR NOLO CONTENDERE

Category: Criminal Procedure

In RE: AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE-2018 REGULAR-CYCLE REPORT.

265 So. 3d 494

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2018 | Docket: 7982207

Cited 1 times | Published

of Voluntariness; Terms of Plea Agreement) of rule 3.172 (Acceptance of Guilty or Nolo Contendere Plea)

Category: Criminal Procedure

JAY LARSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

247 So. 3d 26

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2018 | Docket: 6368587

Cited 1 times | Published

Major v. State, 814 So. 2d 424, 431 (Fla. 2002). Rule 3.172(c) requires the trial court to determine that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Blackwood v. State

217 So. 3d 1146, 2017 WL 1534780, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6002

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2017 | Docket: 60265632

Cited 1 times | Published

2014), which held that giving defendants the rule 3.172(c)(8) warning that they may be subject to deportation

Category: Criminal Procedure

Griffin v. State

202 So. 3d 872, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13178

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2016 | Docket: 60257301

Cited 1 times | Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(j) (providing that “[f]ailure to follow any of the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mitchell v. State

197 So. 3d 1271, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12392, 2016 WL 4375977

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2016 | Docket: 4121182

Cited 1 times | Published

121 So.3d at 430. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(g) (“No plea offer or negotiation is binding

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mitchell v. State

197 So. 3d 1271, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12392, 2016 WL 4375977

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2016 | Docket: 4121182

Cited 1 times | Published

121 So.3d at 430. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(g) (“No plea offer or negotiation is binding

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hardware v. State

185 So. 3d 530, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15189, 2015 WL 5965218

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2015 | Docket: 2919768

Cited 1 times | Published

“may” or “could” deportation warning required by rule 3.172(c)(8), to state a claim for relief under Padilla

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Yeomans

172 So. 3d 1006, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13181, 2015 WL 5164909

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2015 | Docket: 60250001

Cited 1 times | Published

colloquy failed to satisfy the requirement in rule 3.172(c)(1) that a court must ensure the defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Yanez v. State

170 So. 3d 9, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5596, 2015 WL 1740377

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2015 | Docket: 2650344

Cited 1 times | Published

“may” or “could” deportation warning required by rule 3.172(c)(8), to state a claim for relief under

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Kelly

147 So. 3d 1061, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14098, 2014 WL 4851776

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 2014 | Docket: 1185178

Cited 1 times | Published

Vanderhoff, 14 So.3d at 1189 (quoting Fla. R. Civ. P. 3.172(c)(1)). Accordingly, the sentences imposed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davis v. State

139 So. 3d 932, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7837, 2014 WL 2151970

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2014 | Docket: 60241240

Cited 1 times | Published

plead.” Mungen, 932 So.2d at 1230 (citing Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(c)). Although the transcript reflects Mr

Category: Criminal Procedure

St. Louis v. State

134 So. 3d 546, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3612, 2014 WL 953463

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2014 | Docket: 60239273

Cited 1 times | Published

‘may’ or ‘could’ deportation warning required by rule 3.172(c)(8), to state a claim for relief under Padilla

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Aiden

118 So. 3d 264, 2013 WL 3814960, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11612

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2013 | Docket: 60233144

Cited 1 times | Published

the Court stated: The proposed amendment to rule 3.172 derived from this Court’s decision in Bolware

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hurt v. State

82 So. 3d 1090, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 977, 2012 WL 204296

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2012 | Docket: 60306051

Cited 1 times | Published

1423, 173 L.Ed.2d 266 (2009). See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(g) (“No plea offer or negotiation is binding

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gallegos v. State

62 So. 3d 1236, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8947, 2011 WL 2341397

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2011 | Docket: 2326909

Cited 1 times | Published

that the plea is voluntarily entered. ..." Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(a). To make this determination, the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carter v. State

43 So. 3d 907, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13388, 2010 WL 3488977

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 2010 | Docket: 2401456

Cited 1 times | Published

alleging the trial court's failure to comply with Rule 3.172(c)(8) was untimely under Green, Carter now argues

Category: Criminal Procedure

Canseco v. State

52 So. 3d 575, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 217, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 644, 2010 WL 1609796

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2010 | Docket: 2408940

Cited 1 times | Published

deportation was not explained, in violation of rule 3.172(c)(8). As a result of his plea, Canseco has been

Category: Criminal Procedure

Courtemanche v. State

24 So. 3d 770, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20557, 2009 WL 5150066

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2009 | Docket: 1648855

Cited 1 times | Published

Stat. (2007). Rule 3.172(i) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provides: Rule 3.172. Acceptance

Category: Criminal Procedure

SAMPEDRO v. State

10 So. 3d 1131, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 4190, 2009 WL 1212028

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 2009 | Docket: 1132334

Cited 1 times | Published

deportation consequences of the plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8). The defendant alleges that his attorney

Category: Criminal Procedure

Valdez v. State

1 So. 3d 1167, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 564, 2009 WL 187709

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2009 | Docket: 1653686

Cited 1 times | Published

for deportation by DHS.[3] It follows that a Rule 3.172(c)(8) warning regarding the possible immigration

Category: Criminal Procedure

MARCKMAN v. State

997 So. 2d 1275, 2009 WL 32420

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2009 | Docket: 1720867

Cited 1 times | Published

involuntary because the court failed to comply with rule 3.172(c) was cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion); Youngblood

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Calabro

957 So. 2d 1210, 2007 WL 1135693

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2007 | Docket: 1679349

Cited 1 times | Published

inadmissible under section 90.410, Florida Statutes, and Rule 3.172(h) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

943 So. 2d 941, 2006 WL 3498512

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2006 | Docket: 1527402

Cited 1 times | Published

judge had rejected the plea agreement. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(g) ("If the trial judge does not concur

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cornelius v. State

913 So. 2d 1176, 2005 WL 2508711

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2005 | Docket: 1698325

Cited 1 times | Published

maximum possible penalty provided by law." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(1); Ashley v. State, 614 So.2d 486, 488

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kelly v. State

907 So. 2d 550, 2005 WL 1459132

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2005 | Docket: 459501

Cited 1 times | Published

to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172, Rule 3.172 only allows the withdrawal of a plea before a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Anderson v. State

860 So. 2d 996, 2003 WL 22415128

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2003 | Docket: 1511594

Cited 1 times | Published

one of the consequences of illegal activity. Rule 3.172(c)(8) requires that a foreign national be advised

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lane v. State

839 So. 2d 854, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3060, 2003 WL 883478

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2003 | Docket: 64821230

Cited 1 times | Published

State, 433 So.2d 1335 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(1)- Appellant alleged that neither the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

834 So. 2d 384, 2003 WL 118202

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 2003 | Docket: 1329040

Cited 1 times | Published

mandatory sentences under the Act. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(i). Under all of the circumstances, Johnson

Category: Criminal Procedure

Seraphin v. State

785 So. 2d 608, 2001 WL 417339

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2001 | Docket: 450248

Cited 1 times | Published

consistently held that the trial court's compliance with rule 3.172(c)(8) is mandatory. See Sanders v. State, 685

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fernandez v. State

780 So. 2d 336, 2001 WL 293699

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2001 | Docket: 1750016

Cited 1 times | Published

admonishment does not satisfy the mandate of rule 3.172(c)(8), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Barlow v. State

784 So. 2d 482, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3225, 2001 WL 245755

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2001 | Docket: 64805190

Cited 1 times | Published

did not go through all of the formalities of rule 3.172(c), which the rule states that a trial court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kindelan v. State

826 So. 2d 1004, 2001 WL 37721

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2001 | Docket: 1197535

Cited 1 times | Published

consequences on his future immigration status. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(8). Kindelan's motion was filed after

Category: Criminal Procedure

Miller v. State

775 So. 2d 394, 2000 WL 1854090

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2000 | Docket: 1232214

Cited 1 times | Published

meaning of formal acceptance as set forth in rule 3.172(f) and held that "formal acceptance of a plea

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hill v. State

768 So. 2d 518, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11323, 2000 WL 1251918

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 2000 | Docket: 64800767

Cited 1 times | Published

inadmissible. See § 90.410, Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(h); McCray v. State, 760 So.2d 988 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

MacKey v. State

743 So. 2d 1117, 1999 WL 621732

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1999 | Docket: 1243587

Cited 1 times | Published

defendant, the State or the court. See id.; Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(f). Mackey moved to withdraw his pleas before

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gonzalez v. State

714 So. 2d 1125, 1998 WL 390559

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1998 | Docket: 461680

Cited 1 times | Published

reversible error. See Fox, 659 So.2d at 1327; Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(i); see also Baker v. State, 344 So.2d 597

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Evans

705 So. 2d 631, 1998 WL 10902

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1998 | Docket: 1573725

Cited 1 times | Published

or manifest injustice. See id. at 355; Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(i). If the claim of innocence is meritless

Category: Criminal Procedure

Conlan v. State

688 So. 2d 375, 1997 WL 24764

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1997 | Docket: 1786953

Cited 1 times | Published

defendant has the right to withdraw the plea. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(g). On the other hand, if the agreement only

Category: Criminal Procedure

Grantham v. State

665 So. 2d 348, 1995 WL 761038

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1995 | Docket: 1351674

Cited 1 times | Published

conduct any inquiry along the lines proposed in rule 3.172(c), appellant's claim that he had been confused

Category: Criminal Procedure

Young v. State

663 So. 2d 1376, 1995 WL 703631

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1995 | Docket: 1313595

Cited 1 times | Published

in Ashley: Consistent with this analysis under rule 3.172, the relevant portion of the habitual offender

Category: Criminal Procedure

Blackwood v. State

648 So. 2d 294, 1995 WL 1712

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1995 | Docket: 1343033

Cited 1 times | Published

establish a factual basis for the plea pursuant to Rule 3.172(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Horton v. State

646 So. 2d 253, 1994 WL 653462

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1994 | Docket: 1405242

Cited 1 times | Published

obligations the defendant will incur as a result. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c).[1] In State v. Ginebra, 511 So.2d 960

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

639 So. 2d 147, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1432

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1994 | Docket: 1712706

Cited 1 times | Published

illegal: [C]onsistent with [that] analysis under rule 3.172, the relevant portion of the habitual offender

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hamlin v. State

627 So. 2d 569, 1993 WL 496036

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1993 | Docket: 1529902

Cited 1 times | Published

assist the trial judge in this function." Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.172(a). Ashley, 614 So.2d at 490 n. 8. The supreme

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tarver v. State

617 So. 2d 336, 1993 WL 105451

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1993 | Docket: 457859

Cited 1 times | Published

failed to conduct the plea colloquy set forth at Rule 3.172(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; 2) the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

601 So. 2d 1253, 1992 WL 143614

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1992 | Docket: 1710884

Cited 1 times | Published

in jeopardy as if he had pled guilty. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(f); Brown v. State, 367 So.2d 616 (Fla. 1979)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stinson v. State

448 So. 2d 1240

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1984 | Docket: 429730

Cited 1 times | Published

maintaining his innocence. Failure to comply with rule 3.172(d) may be raised as error on direct appeal. See

Category: Criminal Procedure

Parson v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2025 | Docket: 70690157

Published

judge, a plea agreement is binding. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(g) (“No plea offer or negotiation is binding

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ira Toomer v. the State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2025 | Docket: 70000165

Published

maintaining his innocence). See generally Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(a)-(e). It is beyond peradventure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Henry David Rodriguez v. the State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 2025 | Docket: 69864381

Published

Jimmy Ryce Act, the trial court had not violated rule 3.172(c)(9), and that Rodriguez’s counsel had not been

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dan Ioan Belc v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2025 | Docket: 69728105

Published

proceeding.” § 90.410, Fla. Stat.; see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(i) (“Except as otherwise provided in this

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kelly A. Kranci v. Casey J. Kranci

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 2024 | Docket: 69393193

Published

defendants of their right to appeal. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(c)(4). A trial judge has no business conditioning

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lucas A. Sanchez-Del Valle v. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Licensing

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2024 | Docket: 69127368

Published

(Committee Note observing that amendment to rule 3.172 “[i]ncorporates Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c), and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Evans v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2024 | Docket: 68484477

Published

“[f]ailure to follow any of the procedures in [Rule 3.172] shall not render a plea void absent a showing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Maxwell v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2024 | Docket: 68422842

Published

had already been formally determined. Cf. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(c)(4), (5) (requiring that trial court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Anthony Frazier v. The State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2024 | Docket: 68249796

Published

plea negotiated between the parties. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(g) (“No plea offer or negotiation is binding

Category: Criminal Procedure

HERMAN BLOUNT v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 2023 | Docket: 67765046

Published

right to withdraw the plea.” Id.; see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(h) (“If the trial judge does not concur

Category: Criminal Procedure

THE STATE OF FLORIDA v. JEREMY ROJAS

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 2023 | Docket: 66698489

Published

the opportunity to withdraw from it. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(h) (“If the trial judge does not concur

Category: Criminal Procedure

THE STATE OF FLORIDA v. VENTURA GUTIERREZ

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2022 | Docket: 63008210

Published

defendant is free to withdraw the offer. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(g) (providing: “No plea offer or negotiation

Category: Criminal Procedure

WILLIAM FENNELL PITTMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 2021 | Docket: 60451654

Published

§ 775.082(9)(a)(3), Fla. Stat. (1999); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(i); Richardson v. State, 706 So. 2d 1349

Category: Criminal Procedure

YINETTE MARIA NUNEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2021 | Docket: 60330363

Published

warning was amended in 2015, is now found in rule 3.172(c)(8)(A), and requires a trial court to advise

Category: Criminal Procedure

State of Florida v. Vernson Edward Dortch

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2021 | Docket: 59921668

Published

rule 3.210, rule 3.172 is animated by due process concerns. Also like rule 3.210, rule 3.172 imposes obligations

Category: Criminal Procedure

RONALD FRENKEL v. PAULA COSTA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2020 | Docket: 18512279

Published

a plea colloquy in a criminal case. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172. However, as we expressed in Richardson

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jonathan Mark Vito v. State of Florida

270 So. 3d 1287

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2019 | Docket: 15651838

Published

court did not review each factor enumerated in Rule 3.172(c) in its colloquy with Vito. We agree

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mohammed Alsubaie v. State of Florida

268 So. 3d 1013

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 2019 | Docket: 15013082

Published

“may subject him or her to deportation.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8) (2014). Thus, even if counsel failed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sam Casseus v. State of Florida

269 So. 3d 580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2019 | Docket: 14533667

Published

at 276. Accordingly, the court directed “that [rule 3.172] be amended as we have done with other consequences

Category: Criminal Procedure

JOSE BERROCALES v. STATE OF FLORIDA

268 So. 3d 771

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2019 | Docket: 14527250

Published

because it was decided prior to the amendment to rule 3.172(c) to add subsection (10). The amendment was

Category: Criminal Procedure

Julian Pluck v. State

251 So. 3d 1042

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2018 | Docket: 7682960

Published

Following the court’s opinion in Hernandez, rule 3.172(c) was amended effective January 1, 2016, as

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure - 2018 Regular-Cycle Report

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 2018 | Docket: 7471972

Published

We reject the Committee’s proposal to amend rule 3.172. The notable changes to the rules are summarized

Category: Criminal Procedure

LEONARD RICHARD FILIPKOWSKI v. STATE OF FLORIDA

252 So. 3d 278

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2018 | Docket: 7096625

Published

any failure by the trial court to comply with rule 3.172(c)(1) was a trial court error not subject to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wilson v. State

239 So. 3d 1283

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2018 | Docket: 64675454

Published

plea. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(a)(5) ; Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(c) ; Koenig v. State, 597 So.2d 256, 258

Category: Criminal Procedure

CURTIS EUGENE WILSON, III v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2018 | Docket: 6343796

Published

plea. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(a)(5); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(c); Koenig v. State, 597 So. 2d 256, 258

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jules v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2017 | Docket: 6235084

Published

Procedure, 188 So. 3d 764 (Fla. 2015); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8)(A)-(D).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Moorer v. State

217 So. 3d 1141, 2017 WL 1533570, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5929

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2017 | Docket: 60265631

Published

the plea is voluntai'ily entered ....” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(a). This determination “demands the utmost

Category: Criminal Procedure

Goddard v. State

217 So. 3d 1105, 2017 WL 1423455, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5524

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 2017 | Docket: 5107949

Published

, Concur. 1 . Prior to 2016, rule 3.172(c)(8) contained a simple advisement that a finding

Category: Criminal Procedure

Richard Todd Robards v. State of Florida

214 So. 3d 568, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 431, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 756

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 2017 | Docket: 4669812

Published

a statement falls within the exclusion under rule 3.172(i).” Schoenwetter v. State, 46 So.3d 535, 546-47

Category: Criminal Procedure

United States v. Robert William Green

842 F.3d 1299, 2016 WL 6994213

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 30, 2016 | Docket: 4546634

Published

that a factual basis for the plea exists.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(a). Furthermore—and distinct from our analysis

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vega v. State

208 So. 3d 215, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16675

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2016 | Docket: 4486852

Published

Procedure Rules Committee to consider an amendment to Rule 3.172 “to require courts, before accepting a plea,

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure – Corrected Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2016 | Docket: 3037339

Published

but also “other conditions of release.” Rule 3.172(c) (Acceptance of Guilty or Nolo Contendere Plea

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure - Corrected Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2016 | Docket: 3029854

Published

but also “other conditions of release.” Rule 3.172(c) (Acceptance of Guilty or Nolo Contendere Plea

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

188 So. 3d 764, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 594, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2949, 2015 WL 10490032

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2015 | Docket: 3008264

Published

but also “other conditions of release.” Rule 3.172(e) (Acceptance of Guilty or Nolo Contendere Plea

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nero Cooke v. State of Florida

174 So. 3d 628, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13810, 2015 WL 5438668

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 2015 | Docket: 2808047

Published

status. In other words, the colloquy required by rule 3.172(c)(8) may refute a defendant’s postconviction

Category: Criminal Procedure

David Meara v. State

154 So. 3d 368, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17159, 2014 WL 5343495

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2014 | Docket: 1419250

Published

acceptance by the court. See Fla. R. Crim P. 3.172(g). These circumstances do not show a reasonable

Category: Criminal Procedure

Santoni v. State

143 So. 3d 1097, 2014 WL 3742475, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11654

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2014 | Docket: 386126

Published

that a factual basis for the plea exists.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(a). Such an inquiry, which requires the

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Kelly

138 So. 3d 1169, 2014 WL 2116364, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7707

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2014 | Docket: 60240519

Published

Vanderhojf, 14 So.3d at 1189 (quoting Fla. R. Civ. P. 3.172(c)(1)). Accordingly, the sentences imposed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Spargo v. State

132 So. 3d 354, 2014 WL 443982, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1381

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2014 | Docket: 60238432

Published

A plea is “formally accepted” for purposes of rule 3.172(g) “when the trial court ‘affirmatively states

Category: Criminal Procedure

Demers v. State

136 So. 3d 634, 2013 WL 5951873, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17847

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2013 | Docket: 60240047

Published

completeness in the plea colloquy. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(c). The State charged Mr. Demers with two

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ramirez v. State

124 So. 3d 967, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16397, 2013 WL 5628733

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2013 | Docket: 60235595

Published

“may” or “could” deportation warning required by rule 3.172(c)(8), to state a claim for relief under Padilla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rabess v. State

115 So. 3d 1079, 2013 WL 3014132, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9619

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 2013 | Docket: 60232082

Published

conviction “may” result in deportation. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8). Appellant claims he was misled because

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure

115 So. 3d 286, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 337, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1944, 2013 WL 2248756

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2013 | Docket: 60232163

Published

immigration consequences, similar to criminal rule 3.172(c)(8); and (4) amend current subdivision (e)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Oropesa v. State

104 So. 3d 1183, 2012 WL 6028858, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20812

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2012 | Docket: 60227354

Published

warning during the plea colloquy in accordance with rule 3.172(c)(8) but claimed that this did not cure the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Blanton v. State

98 So. 3d 722, 2012 WL 4748114, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16980

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2012 | Docket: 60312540

Published

75 So.3d 757, 759 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (holding “rule 3.172(g) only applies prior to sentencing”). BENTON

Category: Criminal Procedure

Deonarinesingh v. State

98 So. 3d 665, 2012 WL 4448922, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16172

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2012 | Docket: 60312512

Published

advised of the possibility of deportation. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8). Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S.-, 130

Category: Criminal Procedure

Beckford v. State

98 So. 3d 666, 2012 WL 4449128, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16176

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2012 | Docket: 60312514

Published

the defendant in open court, pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8), that a plea to criminal charges could

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lynch v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

897 F. Supp. 2d 1277, 2012 WL 4377812, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136981

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2012 | Docket: 65985498

Published

is no issue of fact.... (Ex. A-2 at 379-80.) Rule 3.172(a) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morales v. State

96 So. 3d 1049, 2012 WL 3711473, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14509

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2012 | Docket: 60311397

Published

warning of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.172(c)(8) cures any prejudice. Flores v. State, 57

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jean v. State

100 So. 3d 94, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13541, 2012 WL 3322460

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2012 | Docket: 60226095

Published

held that the deportation warning required by rule 3.172(c)(8) does not cure the prejudice resulting from

Category: Criminal Procedure

O'Neill v. State

107 So. 3d 1133, 2012 WL 1959460, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8806

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2012 | Docket: 60228562

Published

had received such a warning in accordance with rule 3.172(c)(8), he could not show the prejudice necessary

Category: Criminal Procedure

Corrao v. State

79 So. 3d 940, 2012 WL 573541, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2704

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2012 | Docket: 60305416

Published

prosecution under chapter 837.” See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(i). These rules “were ‘adopted to promote

Category: Criminal Procedure

Campbell v. State

75 So. 3d 757, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17207, 2011 WL 5105638

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2011 | Docket: 60303927

Published

filed his motion to withdraw plea pur*758suant to rule 3.172(g).1 In his motion, Mr. Campbell argued that

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Phillips

62 So. 3d 1159, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8104, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1180

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2011 | Docket: 2361825

Published

including "any mandatory minimum penalty." Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(c)(1); Ashley v. State, 614 So.2d 486,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lalime v. State

60 So. 3d 1175, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7178, 2011 WL 1878082

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 2011 | Docket: 60300086

Published

because the court failed to advise her, pursuant to rule 3.172(c)(8), that her plea could subject her to deportation

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vargas v. State

63 So. 3d 47, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6670, 2011 WL 1774053

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2011 | Docket: 60301149

Published

up certain direct appellate rights. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(4) ("[T]he trial judge should ... place

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ramos v. State

47 So. 3d 400, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18012, 2010 WL 4771064

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 2010 | Docket: 2399544

Published

*403 transcript will demonstrate a violation of rule 3.172(c)(8)." 944 So.2d at 218. The court stated that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carruthers v. State

42 So. 3d 337, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12174, 2010 WL 3239140

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 2010 | Docket: 1921907

Published

alleged deficiencies prejudiced him. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(j) ("Failure to follow any of the procedures

Category: Criminal Procedure

Howard v. State

41 So. 3d 1076, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11735, 2010 WL 3155009

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 2010 | Docket: 1238715

Published

failed to tell him any of the things required by rule 3.172(c)." Id. at 700 n. 1 (emphasis added). The circuit

Category: Criminal Procedure

Roberto Garces v. U.S. Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 27, 2010 | Docket: 2907059

Published

Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8) (“[T]he trial judge . . . shall determine

Category: Criminal Procedure

Roberto Garces v. United States Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 27, 2010 | Docket: 294401

Published

Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8) (“[T]he trial judge . . . shall determine

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sanchez v. State

33 So. 3d 753, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5230, 2010 WL 1542635

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2010 | Docket: 1153759

Published

plea void absent a showing of prejudice." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(i) (2006); see Otero v. State, 696 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Francis v. State

31 So. 3d 285, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4215, 2010 WL 1222654

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2010 | Docket: 1647912

Published

misadvice as well. The trial court noted that Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c) was amended effective January 1, 1989

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gomez v. State

28 So. 3d 114, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 263, 2010 WL 173607

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 2010 | Docket: 1165805

Published

court that he could be deported, as required by rule 3.172(c), and that there was no indication that his

Category: Criminal Procedure

Isaacs v. State

10 So. 3d 1206, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8664, 2009 WL 1766699

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 2009 | Docket: 2579716

Published

plea may subject him to deportation. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(c). The order in this case, dismissing

Category: Criminal Procedure

NASTASIC v. State

11 So. 3d 418, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 4631, 2009 WL 1312510

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 2009 | Docket: 1656654

Published

him of its deportation consequences. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8). The postconviction court summarily

Category: Criminal Procedure

Castrillon v. State

8 So. 3d 1223, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3822, 2009 WL 1139415

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 2009 | Docket: 1654531

Published

hearing transcript will demonstrate a violation of rule 3.172(c)(8). Green, 944 So.2d at 218. In this case

Category: Criminal Procedure

Castrillon v. State

8 So. 3d 1223, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3822, 2009 WL 1139415

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 2009 | Docket: 1654531

Published

hearing transcript will demonstrate a violation of rule 3.172(c)(8). Green, 944 So.2d at 218. In this case

Category: Criminal Procedure

GAEDTKE v. McNeil

612 F. Supp. 2d 1209, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29093, 2009 WL 800135

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 2009 | Docket: 2361666

Published

review by appropriate collateral attack[.] Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(4) (emphasis added). However, the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Hayes

997 So. 2d 446, 2008 WL 5070255

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 2008 | Docket: 1720840

Published

time up until it is accepted by the court. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(g) ("No plea offer or negotiation is binding

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nunes v. State

988 So. 2d 636, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8419, 2008 WL 2356702

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 2008 | Docket: 64855487

Published

plea or offer. Rule 3.172(i) restates section 90.410, Florida Statutes (2006).3 Rule 3.172(f) is derived

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Guzman

979 So. 2d 1144, 2008 WL 1733608

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2008 | Docket: 325300

Published

negotiations, see § 90.410, Fla. Stat. (2007); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(h); Richardson v. State, 706 So.2d 1349

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jaar v. State

973 So. 2d 1164, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 11513, 2007 WL 2141828

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2007 | Docket: 64853862

Published

possible deportation consequences. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8). After deportation proceedings were

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.170 & 3.172

953 So. 2d 513, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 116, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 558, 2007 WL 924070

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2007 | Docket: 64850055

Published

light of the committee’s proposed amendments to rule 3.172(d), which are discussed below. After considering

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ghneim v. State

950 So. 2d 542, 2007 WL 837168

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2007 | Docket: 2547407

Published

plea may subject him to deportation. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8). Considering the Florida Supreme Court's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rashdi v. State

948 So. 2d 917, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1835, 2007 WL 461028

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2007 | Docket: 64849140

Published

plea may subject him to deportation. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8). Consider*918ing the Florida Supreme

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Eddie

949 So. 2d 1088, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1451, 2007 WL 397466

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2007 | Docket: 64849501

Published

defendant starting to serve his sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(f); Rodriguez, 899 So.2d at 473. Thus, the

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.170 & 3.172

938 So. 2d 978, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2208, 2006 WL 2690141

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2006 | Docket: 64847113

Published

Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a)-(e). RULE 3.172 ACCEPTANCE OF GUILTY OR NOLO CONTENDERE PLEA

Category: Criminal Procedure

Shuman v. State

939 So. 2d 122, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14743, 2006 WL 2504991

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2006 | Docket: 64847140

Published

924.051(4) & -.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2003); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(4). An issue is preserved on a guilty

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gutierrez v. State

935 So. 2d 546, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10666, 2006 WL 1751312

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 2006 | Docket: 64846083

Published

Criminal Procedure, 536 So.2d 992 (Fla.1988)(Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8) requires judges presiding at plea

Category: Criminal Procedure

Charles v. State

920 So. 2d 740, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1641, 2006 WL 304674

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2006 | Docket: 64842352

Published

deportation. To obtain postconviction relief based on a rule 3.172(c)(8) violation, the defendant must establish

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. David

908 So. 2d 1188, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13695, 2005 WL 2086341

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2005 | Docket: 64840063

Published

involuntary because he was not advised — as required by rule 3.172(c)(8) — of the potential deportation consequences

Category: Criminal Procedure

Joseph v. State

904 So. 2d 577, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9211, 2005 WL 1398007

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2005 | Docket: 64839061

Published

understood the plea and voluntarily entered into it. Rule 3.172(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, sets

Category: Criminal Procedure

Collucci v. State

903 So. 2d 333, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8877, 2005 WL 1364380

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2005 | Docket: 64838802

Published

of Criminal Procedure 3.170(f) and 3.172(f). Rule 3.172(f) requires a court to permit a defendant to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lamour v. State

899 So. 2d 1256, 2005 WL 906258

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2005 | Docket: 64837845

Published

1998). As in Rigabar, once the factors set out in Rule 3.172 were satisfied and a stipulation and court finding

Category: Criminal Procedure

Zelaya v. State

891 So. 2d 1192, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 948, 2005 WL 235961

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 2005 | Docket: 64835678

Published

the possibility of “deportation” as required by Rule 3.172(c)(8). As the warning given in the present ease

Category: Criminal Procedure

Payne v. State

890 So. 2d 284, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17810, 2004 WL 2633459

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 2004 | Docket: 64835250

Published

To obtain post-conviction relief based on a Rule 3.172(c)(8) violation, a defendant must establish that:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Payne v. State

890 So. 2d 284, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17810, 2004 WL 2633459

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 2004 | Docket: 64835250

Published

To obtain post-conviction relief based on a Rule 3.172(c)(8) violation, a defendant must establish that:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodriguez v. State

890 So. 2d 280, 2004 WL 2534289

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2004 | Docket: 2590237

Published

consequence of a plea to criminal charges."); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

885 So. 2d 449, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15675, 2004 WL 2375612

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2004 | Docket: 64833720

Published

state concedes in its brief that the absence of a rule 3.172(c) inquiry1 in the present case “compels the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sehnal v. State

884 So. 2d 478, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14634, 2004 WL 2251869

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2004 | Docket: 64833564

Published

limitation in rule 3.850 applies to writs alleging a rule 3.172(c)(8) violation and, if so, at what point does

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Baker

874 So. 2d 643, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5013, 2004 WL 784550

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2004 | Docket: 64830920

Published

before Baker’s plea had been accepted. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172 (stating that court must satisfy itself

Category: Criminal Procedure

Collins v. State

858 So. 2d 1197, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17065, 2003 WL 22658127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2003 | Docket: 64826404

Published

on a trial judge’s findings made pursuant to rule 3.172. Buell v. State, 704 So.2d 552, 553 (Fla. 4th

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Caswell

999 So. 2d 1065, 2003 WL 22460275

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 2003 | Docket: 1514861

Published

under Ashley and a `penalty' contemplated by Rule 3.172(c)(1)," but in Major v. State, 814 So.2d 424

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodriguez-Grave v. State

847 So. 2d 564, 2003 WL 21340331

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 2003 | Docket: 2524349

Published

respect to pleas entered prior to the change in rule 3.172"); see also Perdomo v. State, 837 So.2d 1089

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Alfonso

835 So. 2d 1171, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18119, 2002 WL 31767820

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2002 | Docket: 64820155

Published

post-conviction relief motion based on violation of rule 3.172(c)(8), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. See

Category: Criminal Procedure

Patrick v. State

830 So. 2d 248, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16898, 2002 WL 31519945

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2002 | Docket: 64818968

Published

he persisted in his plea of no contest. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c). Further, the record does not show a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cutuli v. State

832 So. 2d 164, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16144, 2002 WL 31487189

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2002 | Docket: 64819436

Published

maximum sentence he could receive. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(1). Thus, we conclude that this claim

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pikwrah v. State

829 So. 2d 402, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16176, 2002 WL 31487258

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2002 | Docket: 64818636

Published

172(c)(8). We reverse and remand. To establish a rule 3.172(c)(8) violation, a defendant must “prove [1]

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harrell v. State

826 So. 2d 1059, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13996, 2002 WL 31126654

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2002 | Docket: 64817740

Published

appellant failed to preserve any argument based upon rule 3.172(f), we must affirm. To the extent that the decision

Category: Criminal Procedure

Chagoya v. State

817 So. 2d 1039, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7673, 2002 WL 1181048

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2002 | Docket: 64815535

Published

possibility of deportation is insufficient to satisfy rule 3.172(c)(8). See Benelhocine v. State, 787 So.2d 38

Category: Criminal Procedure

Altamirano v. State

817 So. 2d 1029, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7715, 2002 WL 1173881

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2002 | Docket: 64815530

Published

on a trial judge’s findings made pursuant to Rule 3.172.” Given the very favorable terms of the plea

Category: Criminal Procedure

Neloms v. State

814 So. 2d 1165, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4963, 2002 WL 561686

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2002 | Docket: 64814671

Published

open court is fatal to his challenge. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(i). Affirmed. WARNER, KLEIN and MAY, JJ„

Category: Criminal Procedure

Reshamwala v. State

805 So. 2d 89, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 307, 2002 WL 63391

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2002 | Docket: 64811770

Published

States Immigration and Naturalization Service.” Rule 3.172(c)(8) is not limited to whether the defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Reshamwala v. State

805 So. 2d 89, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 307, 2002 WL 63391

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2002 | Docket: 64811770

Published

States Immigration and Naturalization Service.” Rule 3.172(c)(8) is not limited to whether the defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

804 So. 2d 445, 2001 WL 1327152

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2001 | Docket: 1334095

Published

prejudice: In order to show prejudice pursuant to a rule 3.172(c)(8) violation, defendants had to establish

Category: Criminal Procedure

L.D.S. v. State

791 So. 2d 548, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10631, 2001 WL 845359

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2001 | Docket: 64807399

Published

2d 1117, 1118 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (citing Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(f)). Accordingly, we reverse L.D.S.’s adjudication

Category: Criminal Procedure

Joseph v. State

787 So. 2d 933, 2001 WL 558026

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2001 | Docket: 1062164

Published

reversed in Perriello based on the language of rule 3.172(c)(8), which directs that judges orally advise

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dobi v. State

780 So. 2d 343, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4109, 2001 WL 303316

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2001 | Docket: 64804367

Published

being the possibility of deportation. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8). The trial court denied the entire

Category: Criminal Procedure

Padgett v. State

780 So. 2d 1021, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4042, 2001 WL 313856

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2001 | Docket: 64804430

Published

maximum possible penalty provided by law. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(1); Ashley v. State, 614 So.2d 486, 488

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ramirez v. State

778 So. 2d 1099, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3212, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 725

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2001 | Docket: 64803963

Published

immigration consequences of his 1986 plea under rule 3.172(c)(8), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.1

Category: Criminal Procedure

Renna v. State

775 So. 2d 1010, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 475, 2001 WL 55480

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2001 | Docket: 64803108

Published

deportation consequences of his plea. See Fla.R .Crim.P. 3.172(c)(8); Labady v. State, No. 3D00-3091, —

Category: Criminal Procedure

Renna v. State

775 So. 2d 1010, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 475, 2001 WL 55480

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2001 | Docket: 64803108

Published

deportation consequences of his plea. See Fla.R .Crim.P. 3.172(c)(8); Labady v. State, No. 3D00-3091, —

Category: Criminal Procedure

Forrest v. State

773 So. 2d 1292, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 61, 2001 WL 9838

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2001 | Docket: 64802625

Published

negotiations, a plea may be withdrawn. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.172(g). In order to contest the involuntariness

Category: Criminal Procedure

Henriquez v. State

774 So. 2d 34, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12699, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2377

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2000 | Docket: 64802636

Published

file for a noncustodial defendant to allege a rule 3.172(c)(8) violation, although as of Wood such claims

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lubin v. State

760 So. 2d 241, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6540, 2000 WL 691057

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2000 | Docket: 64797938

Published

that there is a factual basis *243for it.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(a). The trial judge had been listening to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Herald v. State

755 So. 2d 763, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3745, 2000 WL 331905

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2000 | Docket: 64796751

Published

453 So.2d 550, 551 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(D). Under these circumstances, Herald had

Category: Criminal Procedure

Robinson v. State

753 So. 2d 774, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3537, 2000 WL 300522

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2000 | Docket: 64795990

Published

State, 658 So.2d 1114 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(f). ANTOON, C.J., W. SHARP, and GRIFFIN

Category: Criminal Procedure

Melendez v. State

747 So. 2d 1011, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16632, 1999 WL 1127762

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1999 | Docket: 64793558

Published

statement was inadmissible as a violation of rule 3.172(h) and section 90.410, as having been made in

Category: Criminal Procedure

Peart v. State

754 So. 2d 723, 1999 WL 565836

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 1999 | Docket: 1523522

Published

guilty plea. This court has previously held that rule 3.172(c) does not permit a written plea agreement to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Anderson v. State

734 So. 2d 1209, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9712, 1999 WL 510563

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1999 | Docket: 64788778

Published

immigration consequences of his plea, as required by Rule 3.172(c)(8), Florida Rules.of Criminal Procedure.

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Luders

731 So. 2d 163, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5703, 1999 WL 270412

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1999 | Docket: 64787843

Published

used a per se rule in evaluating a violation of Rule 3.172(c). In Wuornos v. State, 676 So.2d 966 (Fla.1995)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lindo v. State

712 So. 2d 842, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8503, 1998 WL 390432

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1998 | Docket: 64781439

Published

reflected in the record satisfies the requirements of rule 3.172(c)(8). STONE, C.J., and GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davis v. State

716 So. 2d 274, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7192, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1468

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1998 | Docket: 64782359

Published

Appellant’s plea, complied with that portion of rule 3.172(c)(1) which requires the trial court to determine

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ingram v. State

763 So. 2d 352, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8840, 1998 WL 281313

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1998 | Docket: 64799001

Published

was to be a “best interests” plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(d). We understand that a trial judge may

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ash v. State

706 So. 2d 931, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1819, 1998 WL 75032

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1998 | Docket: 64779299

Published

reasons for the July 1996 departure. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172. Second, under Grady v. State, 618 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hoag v. State

711 So. 2d 572, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14468, 1997 WL 817826

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1997 | Docket: 64781131

Published

election in the proceeding below to treat Hoag’s rule 3.172(f) motion as one seeking postconviction relief

Category: Criminal Procedure

Chaar v. State

685 So. 2d 1037, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 124, 1997 WL 11545

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1997 | Docket: 64770210

Published

Procedure, 536 So.2d 992, 994 (Fla.1988); Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Session v. State

673 So. 2d 194, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5125, 1996 WL 253284

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1996 | Docket: 64764536

Published

25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(d).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Curry v. State

671 So. 2d 291, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3712, 1996 WL 168916

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1996 | Docket: 64763729

Published

is important to remember that the purpose of rule 3.172 is to provide a procedure designed to ensure

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Franklin

669 So. 2d 339, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2340, 1996 WL 106431

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1996 | Docket: 64762868

Published

manifest injustice. Id. at 274. See also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(i). A trial court may determine that a factual

Category: Criminal Procedure

Taylor v. State

662 So. 2d 1031, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12186, 1995 WL 686062

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1995 | Docket: 64760141

Published

interest” pleas, are permitted in Florida. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.172(d) & Committee Notes. See Rigabar v. Broome

Category: Criminal Procedure

Calloway v. State

658 So. 2d 1235, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8692, 1995 WL 488194

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 1995 | Docket: 64758181

Published

denying the request for withdrawal. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(f); Howard v. State, 516 So.2d 81 (Fla. 1st

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lugo v. State

658 So. 2d 623, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7755, 1995 WL 421889

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1995 | Docket: 64758023

Published

be a habitual felony offender sentence. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.172(i) (“[flailure to follow any of the procedures

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harris v. State

655 So. 2d 1179, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5070, 1995 WL 276084

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1995 | Docket: 64756666

Published

if there is a mandatory minimum penalty. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(1). More specifically, the court instructed:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodriguez v. State

645 So. 2d 1124, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12176, 1994 WL 697423

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1994 | Docket: 64752395

Published

before accepting his original plea, see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(1), he will be required to demonstrate

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Reutter

644 So. 2d 564, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9831, 1994 WL 558412

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1994 | Docket: 64751792

Published

determined the voluntariness of his plea pursuant to rule 3.172. See Suarez v. State, 616 So.2d 1067 (Fla. 3d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cole v. State

640 So. 2d 1194, 1994 WL 393422

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1994 | Docket: 2574997

Published

sentence which she could receive, in violation of Rule 3.172(c)(1), Fla.R.Crim.P. I perceive some degree of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bryant v. State

625 So. 2d 140, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10796, 1993 WL 428260

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1993 | Docket: 64743338

Published

an opportunity to "withdraw his plea. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.172(f) and (g). See also Davis v. State, 308

Category: Criminal Procedure

Colon v. State

619 So. 2d 34, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6216, 1993 WL 196322

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1993 | Docket: 64696535

Published

before us contains no evidence of compliance with rule 3.172. Although Colon signed a written plea form, it

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rolling v. State

619 So. 2d 20, 1993 WL 153755

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1993 | Docket: 1721753

Published

appellant's waiver of the right to counsel. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c). Judge Futch's dialogue was not deficient

Category: Criminal Procedure

In the Interest of L.A.D. v. State

616 So. 2d 106, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3210

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1993 | Docket: 64695253

Published

601 So.2d 540 (Fla.1992). The requirement of rule 3.172 and section 775.084 concerning pre-plea notice

Category: Criminal Procedure

Collins v. State

606 So. 2d 517, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11347, 1992 WL 322977

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1992 | Docket: 64670720

Published

therefore reverse as to that conviction. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c). The state also concedes that the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Black v. State

599 So. 2d 1380, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5811, 1992 WL 109633

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1992 | Docket: 64667873

Published

that there is a factual basis for the plea_” Rule 3.172(a) also contains similar language and provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

McAroy v. State

597 So. 2d 984, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5812, 1992 WL 109626

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1992 | Docket: 64666937

Published

court indicate that the colloquy provided for in Rule 3.172, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, was not

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

590 So. 2d 32, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11880, 1991 WL 248624

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1991 | Docket: 64663497

Published

v. State, 419 So.2d 725 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). Rule 3.172(g), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, allows

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

587 So. 2d 563, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9861, 1991 WL 199929

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1991 | Docket: 64662281

Published

address the facts presented in the instant case, Rule 3.172(h), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Marriott v. State

582 So. 2d 728, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6149, 1991 WL 117026

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1991 | Docket: 64660142

Published

guilty or nolo contendere is not a U.S. citizen. Rule 3.172(c)(i) requires the trial judge to determine that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

578 So. 2d 473, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3702, 1991 WL 60842

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1991 | Docket: 64658272

Published

proceedings consistent with this opinion and Rule 3.172 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. In

Category: Criminal Procedure

Anfield v. State

576 So. 2d 388, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2214, 1991 WL 35033

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1991 | Docket: 64657322

Published

plea by conducting the colloquy provided for in rule 3.172. See Diaz v. State, 439 So.2d 1011 (Fla. 2d DCA

Category: Criminal Procedure

Autera v. State

550 So. 2d 1158, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5368, 1989 WL 115565

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 1989 | Docket: 64645815

Published

State, 493 So.2d 55 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sharpe v. State

547 So. 2d 334, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1905, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4606, 1989 WL 90488

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 1989 | Docket: 64644217

Published

Davis v. State, 308 So.2d 27, 29 (Fla.1975); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172. See also Brown v. State, 245 So.2d 41 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

546 So. 2d 56, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1569, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3577, 1989 WL 69202

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1989 | Docket: 64643579

Published

maximum possible penalty provided by law. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(i). Unless the record conclusively shows

Category: Criminal Procedure

Yarbrough v. State

540 So. 2d 267, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 857, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1862, 1989 WL 32662

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 1989 | Docket: 64641187

Published

the factual basis of his plea, pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172, and that he was incorrectly convicted of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas v. State

537 So. 2d 193, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 217, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 196, 1989 WL 7177

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1989 | Docket: 64639944

Published

his plea of guilty may be accepted. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(i). No matter how clear the good faith

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cook v. State

533 So. 2d 1180, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2150, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4055, 1988 WL 121469

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1988 | Docket: 64638633

Published

238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.172. Since the testimony at the hearing fully

Category: Criminal Procedure

Garza v. State

519 So. 2d 727, 13 Fla. 352, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 435, 1988 WL 7071

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1988 | Docket: 64632535

Published

and the state dismissed the grand theft charge. Rule 3.172(c)(i) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Huot v. State

516 So. 2d 1140, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 87, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11642, 1987 WL 3029

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1987 | Docket: 64631551

Published

He was not advised of the possible penalties. Rule 3.172(c)(i), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, mandates

Category: Criminal Procedure

Small v. State

516 So. 2d 39, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2724, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11276, 1987 WL 1951

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1987 | Docket: 64631189

Published

the mandatory nature of the inquiry required by Rule 3.172(c)), and remand the cause to the trial court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bir v. State

515 So. 2d 397, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2622, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11085

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1987 | Docket: 64630867

Published

research reveals no case which has interpreted Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172 in such a distorted manner.2 AFFIRMED. ERVIN

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bir v. State

515 So. 2d 397, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2622, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11085

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1987 | Docket: 64630867

Published

research reveals no case which has interpreted Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172 in such a distorted manner.2 AFFIRMED. ERVIN

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carroll v. State

509 So. 2d 1225, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1640, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9272

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1987 | Docket: 64628411

Published

Under these circumstances, the provision of Rule 3.172(i) that the “[f]ailure to follow any of the procedures

Category: Criminal Procedure

Meredith v. State

508 So. 2d 473, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1390, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8587

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1987 | Docket: 64627806

Published

whether there was a factual basis for the plea. See Rule 3.172(a), Fla.R.Crim.P.; Maselli v. State, 446 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Coban v. State

502 So. 2d 1262, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 643, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11615

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1986 | Docket: 64625245

Published

guilty to a charge of first degree murder. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(i). We regard that failure as sufficient

Category: Criminal Procedure

Waldon v. State

483 So. 2d 101, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 447, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6375

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1986 | Docket: 64617385

Published

Procedure 3.850. See § 924.06(3), Fla.Stat.; Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(iv); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1); Stinson

Category: Criminal Procedure

Shipman v. State

459 So. 2d 1176, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16036

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 1984 | Docket: 64608501

Published

DISMISSED. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(vi), § 924.06(3), Fla.Stat.; Robinson

Category: Criminal Procedure

Young v. State

453 So. 2d 1388, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1792, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14706

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 1984 | Docket: 64606329

Published

2d 41, 44 (Fla.1971). . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(vii). .Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(e).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Taylor v. State

453 So. 2d 483, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14192

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1984 | Docket: 64606110

Published

or innocence. Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(b)(1); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(iv). The record reflects no appeal-able

Category: Criminal Procedure

Clark v. State

452 So. 2d 1002, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13879

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 1984 | Docket: 64605898

Published

chapter 837 [the perjury statute]. See also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(h). Section 90.410 plays a vital role in

Category: Criminal Procedure

Burton v. State

442 So. 2d 355, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25080

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1983 | Docket: 64601517

Published

approved by the trial judge pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(f). However, we agree that the admission

Category: Criminal Procedure

Diaz v. State

439 So. 2d 1011, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23435

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1983 | Docket: 64600316

Published

might entitle appellant to relief. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(iv). The trial court, however, failed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gastineau v. State

398 So. 2d 492, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19888

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 1981 | Docket: 64582656

Published

the judgment. Fla.R. App.P. 9.140(b)(1); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(iv). The^ record reflects no appeala-ble

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomason v. State

395 So. 2d 293, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18946

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1981 | Docket: 64581031

Published

court's order. § 924.06(3), Fla.Stat. (1979); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172; Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b). See Wells v. State

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pugh v. State

379 So. 2d 398, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15453

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1980 | Docket: 64574094

Published

affirmed. LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur. . Fla.R.Crim.P, 3.172(c)(i) and (vii).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bryant v. State

373 So. 2d 380, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15193

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1979 | Docket: 64571196

Published

required by case law and our criminal rules (Rule 3.172, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; Cf. Williams

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wright v. State

376 So. 2d 236, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16156

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1979 | Docket: 64572512

Published

acceptance of the nolo plea, was not preserved. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(a) requires that the trial judge shall satisfy

Category: Criminal Procedure

Willis v. Wainwright

375 So. 2d 3, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14548

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1979 | Docket: 64571961

Published

reservation constitutes a waiver pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(iv) and the cases construing this rule

Category: Criminal Procedure

Adams v. State

371 So. 2d 150, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14385

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1979 | Docket: 64570254

Published

particularity the point of law being reserved.” See also Rule 3.172(c)(iv), Fla.R.Crim.P. Though appellant does have

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

366 So. 2d 1258, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14161

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1979 | Docket: 64568346

Published

effectively complied with the provisions of Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.172. See also Thornton v. State, 354 So.2d 892

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

366 So. 2d 1258, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14161

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1979 | Docket: 64568346

Published

effectively complied with the provisions of Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.172. See also Thornton v. State, 354 So.2d 892

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stell v. State

366 So. 2d 825, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 13985

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1979 | Docket: 64568194

Published

admitted, it is contended, in violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(h). The record demonstrates that after the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wright v. Wainwright

359 So. 2d 11, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16015

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1978 | Docket: 64564613

Published

mandatory or maximum possible penalty contemplated by Rule 3.172(c)(i), Fla.R.Crim.P., of which the trial judge

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gunsby v. Wainwright

449 F. Supp. 1041, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18376

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1978 | Docket: 66133529

Published

contain a new rule which follows the Federal Rule. Rule 3.172 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure which

Category: Criminal Procedure

Anderson v. State

352 So. 2d 1210, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 17142

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1977 | Docket: 64561793

Published

1975). We note that effective July 1, 1977, Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.172(a) requires the trial judge to satisfy himself

Category: Criminal Procedure

Birdsall v. State

350 So. 2d 798, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16456

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1977 | Docket: 64560575

Published

of guilty and proceed to trial. . Under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(vii), effective July 1, 1977, the complete

Category: Criminal Procedure