RULE 3.171. PLEA DISCUSSIONS AND AGREEMENTS

(a) In General. Ultimate responsibility for sentence
determination rests with the trial judge. However, the prosecuting
attorney and the defense attorney, or the defendant when
representing himself or herself, are encouraged to discuss and to
agree on pleas that may be entered by a defendant. The discussion
and agreement must be conducted with the defendant’s counsel. If
the defendant represents himself or herself, all discussions between
the defendant and the prosecuting attorney shall be of record.

(b) Responsibilities of the Prosecuting Attorney.

(1) A prosecuting attorney may:

(A) engage in discussions with defense counsel or
a defendant who is without counsel with a view toward reaching an
agreement that, upon the defendant’s entering a plea of guilty or
nolo contendere to a charged offense or to a lesser or related
offense, the prosecuting attorney will do any of the following:

(i) abandon other charges; or

(ii) make a recommendation, or agree not to
oppose the defendant’s request for a particular sentence, with the
understanding that such recommendation or request shall not be
binding on the trial judge; or

(iii) agree to a specific sentence; and
(B) consult with the victim, investigating officer, or
other interested persons and advise the trial judge of their views
during the course of plea discussions.

(2) The prosecuting attorney shall:

(A) apprise the trial judge of all material facts
known to the attorney regarding the offense and the defendant’s
background prior to acceptance of a plea by the trial judge; and

(B) maintain the record of direct discussions with
a defendant who represents himself or herself and make the record
available to the trial judge upon the entry of a plea arising from
these discussions.

(c) Responsibilities of Defense Counsel.

(1) Defense counsel shall not conclude any plea
agreement on behalf of a defendant-client without the client’s full
and complete consent thereto, being certain that any decision to
plead guilty or nolo contendere is made by the defendant.

(2) Defense counsel shall advise defendant of:

(A) all plea offers; and

(B) all pertinent matters bearing on the choice of
which plea to enter and the particulars attendant upon each plea
and the likely results thereof, as well as any possible alternatives
that may be open to the defendant.

(d) Responsibilities of the Trial Judge. After an agreement
on a plea has been reached, the trial judge may have made known
to him or her the agreement and reasons therefor prior to the
acceptance of the plea. Thereafter, the judge shall advise the parties
whether other factors (unknown at the time) may make his or her
concurrence impossible.

Committee Notes
1972 Amendment. New in Florida. Most criminal cases are
disposed of by pleas of guilty arrived at by negotiations between
prosecutor and defense counsel, but there was no record of the
“plea negotiations,” “plea bargaining,” or “compromise.” The result
has been a flood of postconviction claims which require evidentiary
hearings and frequently conflicting testimony concerning the plea
negotiations. There has also been criticism of the practice of
requiring a defendant, upon a negotiated guilty plea, to give a
negative reply to the court’s inquiry concerning any “promise” made
to the defendant. This is designed to avoid the foregoing pitfalls and
criticisms by having the negotiations made of record and permitting
some control of them. See Commentary to Standard 3.1 ABA
Standards relating to pleas of guilty.

(a) From Standard 3.1a.

(b) From Standard 3.2.

(c) From Standard 3.3 except for omission of that part of
standard which prohibits trial judge from participating in plea
discussions.

(d) From Standard 3.4.

1977 Amendment. This is a rewording of the prior rule in
order to set out the responsibilities of the participants. The rule
recognizes the ultimate responsibility of the trial judge, but it
encourages prosecution and defense counsel to assist the trial
judge in this regard. When the circumstances of the case so merit,
it is the responsibility of each respective party to discuss a fair
disposition in lieu of trial. For protection of the prosecutor and the
defendant, plea discussions between the state and a pro se
defendant should be recorded, in writing or electronically.

(b) New in Florida.

(1)(i) Restatement of policy followed by extensive revision in
the form of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(e)(1).
(1)(ii) The rule sets out discretionary minimum professional
prosecutorial procedure where either victim or law enforcement
officers are involved to better guide the trial judge.

(2)(i) Mandatory responsibility of prosecutor contemplates
disposition with no presentence investigation.

(2)(ii) Mandatory record protects both the prosecutor and the
pro se defendant.

(c)(1) Renumbering subdivision (b) of prior rule.

(2)(i) New in Florida. This proposed language makes it
mandatory for defense counsel to advise fully defendant of all plea
offers by the state. Defense counsel should also discuss and explain
to the defendant those matters which trial judge will inquire about
before accepting a plea.

(2)(ii) Same as prior rule 3.171(b), paragraph 2.

(d) Now embraces and renumbers former rule 3.171(c). The
content of former rule 3.171(d) now appears as part of new rule
3.172.