Cases Citing Rule 3.170
Total Results: 545
894 So. 2d 935, 2005 WL 318570
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2005 | Docket: 1767702
Cited 117 times | Published
against the defendant in a trial of that cause.
Rule 3.170(f) limits the opportunity for withdrawing a plea
Category: Criminal Procedure
316 So. 2d 267
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1975 | Docket: 410792
Cited 109 times | Published
hurried or treated summarily.[4]
Our Criminal Rule 3.170 principally sets forth necessary procedural steps
Category: Criminal Procedure
272 So. 2d 65
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1973 | Docket: 1755077
Cited 102 times | Published
shall be made in writing under the provisions of Rule 3.170(a);
(3) At any pre-trial conference; unless waived
Category: Criminal Procedure
17 So. 3d 275, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 477, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1412, 2009 WL 2622684
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2009 | Docket: 1644788
Cited 65 times | Published
pro se motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l), which contains specific allegations that
Category: Criminal Procedure
762 So. 2d 507, 2000 WL 821675
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2000 | Docket: 1690838
Cited 59 times | Published
consent to a plea to lesser charges; however, rule 3.170 is silent on whether the state must consent where
Category: Criminal Procedure
392 So. 2d 54
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1981 | Docket: 1268252
Cited 56 times | Published
defendant prior to the invalid plea. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f), 3.171, and 3.172. Thus, appellant should
Category: Criminal Procedure
761 So. 2d 269, 1999 WL 628777
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 1999 | Docket: 1300131
Cited 47 times | Published
the requirements for withdrawing pleas:
*274 Rule 3.170(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
60 So. 3d 1045, 2011 WL 1496466
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 2011 | Docket: 60300040
Cited 42 times | Published
motion to withdraw a plea after sentencing under rule 3.170(0, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Second
Category: Criminal Procedure
743 So. 2d 70, 1999 WL 641843
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1999 | Docket: 526331
Cited 42 times | Published
to withdraw plea after sentencing pursuant to rule 3.170(l) as one seeking collateral or "postconviction"
Category: Criminal Procedure
500 So. 2d 125, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 10
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1986 | Docket: 1295196
Cited 41 times | Published
459, 460 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975) (violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j)); Broeck v. State, 317 So.2d 100, 100
Category: Criminal Procedure
840 So. 2d 1040, 2003 WL 359316
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2003 | Docket: 1748307
Cited 38 times | Published
permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f) (emphasis added). Under this provision
Category: Criminal Procedure
308 So. 2d 27
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1975 | Docket: 1672969
Cited 38 times | Published
State, 259 So.2d 200, 203 (Fla. App. 1972).
[10] Rule 3.170(f), R.Cr.P.; Brown v. State, supra Note 6.
[11]
Category: Criminal Procedure
964 So. 2d 106, 2007 WL 1362862
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2007 | Docket: 1268266
Cited 37 times | Published
lenient presentence standard of rule 3.170(f).
Specifically, rule 3.170(f) provides that "[t]he court may
Category: Criminal Procedure
345 So. 2d 711
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1977 | Docket: 251667
Cited 34 times | Published
there being no express requirement therefor under Rule 3.170 RCrP, that if the trial judge indeed makes such
Category: Criminal Procedure
336 So. 2d 65
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1976 | Docket: 2521736
Cited 30 times | Published
140 Rule 3.150 Rule 3.152
Rule 3.160 Rule 3.170 Rule 3.180
Rule 3.190 Rule 3.210 Rule
Category: Criminal Procedure
374 So. 2d 944
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1979 | Docket: 430273
Cited 29 times | Published
permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f). The trial judge found that there was
Category: Criminal Procedure
611 So. 2d 1250, 1992 WL 158119
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1992 | Docket: 1757385
Cited 28 times | Published
Levens the court distinguished Setzer as involving rule 3.170(f) rather than 3.850. In concluding that Setzer
Category: Criminal Procedure
260 So. 2d 198
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1972 | Docket: 1459465
Cited 28 times | Published
under the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rule 3.170 F.R.C.P., 33 F.S.A.). Courts may not, however
Category: Criminal Procedure
884 So. 2d 316, 2004 WL 1969521
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 2004 | Docket: 273542
Cited 26 times | Published
such pro se motions should normally be stricken.
Rule 3.170(l) provides:
Motion to Withdraw the Plea after
Category: Criminal Procedure
303 So. 2d 17
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1974 | Docket: 2467686
Cited 26 times | Published
fully conformed to Florida Criminal Procedure Rule 3.170 and the federal standards set forth in Boykin
Category: Criminal Procedure
670 So. 2d 1042, 1996 WL 106350
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1996 | Docket: 1671266
Cited 24 times | Published
531 So.2d 418, 419 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Yesnes.
Rule 3.170(f), which governs the withdrawal of pleas before
Category: Criminal Procedure
716 So. 2d 827, 1998 WL 537277
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 1998 | Docket: 424574
Cited 23 times | Published
his plea. This court has jurisdiction. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(l); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(iii).
On
Category: Criminal Procedure
440 So. 2d 628
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1983 | Docket: 1429949
Cited 23 times | Published
nor presented argument in defendant's behalf.
Rule 3.170(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
685 So. 2d 1253
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1996 | Docket: 1735082
Cited 22 times | Published
rule 3.800(b) and added new subdivision (1) to rule 3.170.
*1255 The appended amendments include the following
Category: Criminal Procedure
837 So. 2d 507, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 278
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 2003 | Docket: 1527456
Cited 21 times | Published
228 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)).[1]
*509 "Although rule 3.170(l) [of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure]
Category: Criminal Procedure
706 So. 2d 1340, 1997 WL 574744
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1997 | Docket: 1280671
Cited 21 times | Published
his plea and its voluntariness" as required by rule 3.170(j). See Elledge v. Graham, 432 So.2d 35, 37 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
706 So. 2d 1340, 1997 WL 574744
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1997 | Docket: 1280671
Cited 21 times | Published
his plea and its voluntariness" as required by rule 3.170(j). See Elledge v. Graham, 432 So.2d 35, 37 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
793 So. 2d 6, 2001 WL 219982
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 2001 | Docket: 2031700
Cited 20 times | Published
untimely as a motion to withdraw plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l) and facially insufficient as a motion pursuant
Category: Criminal Procedure
439 So. 2d 246
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1983 | Docket: 1264988
Cited 20 times | Published
guilty plea than for a valid waiver of jury trial. Rule 3.170(j) requires that before a plea of guilty may
Category: Criminal Procedure
382 So. 2d 1298
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1980 | Docket: 1255650
Cited 20 times | Published
guilty plea prior to imposition of sentence, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f); State v. Braverman, 348 So.2d 1183 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
501 So. 2d 591, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 80
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1987 | Docket: 538258
Cited 19 times | Published
the withdrawal of his plea as required under Rule 3.170(f). The trial court, therefore, erred in refusing
Category: Criminal Procedure
846 So. 2d 660, 2003 WL 21273777
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2003 | Docket: 1301563
Cited 18 times | Published
warrant a hearing. Because a motion pursuant to rule 3.170 has been treated as a critical stage of proceedings
Category: Criminal Procedure
819 So. 2d 891, 2002 WL 1309352
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 2002 | Docket: 1750123
Cited 18 times | Published
indicated his desire to avail himself of the rule 3.170(l) procedure, the trial judge upon remand *892
Category: Criminal Procedure
953 So. 2d 782, 2007 WL 675338
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2007 | Docket: 1712888
Cited 17 times | Published
v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla.1996). However, rule 3.170(l) provides that relief may be denied without
Category: Criminal Procedure
613 So. 2d 893, 1992 WL 289670
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1992 | Docket: 1511306
Cited 17 times | Published
Hunt's plea prior to imposition of sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f); Adler v. State, 382 So.2d 1298 (Fla.
Category: Criminal Procedure
402 So. 2d 386
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1981 | Docket: 1313528
Cited 17 times | Published
257, 92 S.Ct. 495, 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170 & 3.171.
Category: Criminal Procedure
959 So. 2d 1254, 2007 WL 1931352
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2007 | Docket: 1525783
Cited 16 times | Published
presented in, and preserved by, the filing of a rule 3.170(l) motion would be hollow indeed if the defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
21 So. 3d 72, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15169, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2058
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 2009 | Docket: 1229956
Cited 15 times | Published
where "a represented defendant files a pro se rule 3.170(l) motion based on allegations giving rise to
Category: Criminal Procedure
937 So. 2d 193, 2006 WL 2419145
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2006 | Docket: 937310
Cited 15 times | Published
life sentence if convicted is cognizable under rule 3.170(l). Boule v. State, 884 So.2d 1023, 1024 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
608 So. 2d 111, 1992 WL 312824
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1992 | Docket: 1732497
Cited 15 times | Published
lesser offense was subject to court approval. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(g).
[4] Because of the procedural posture
Category: Criminal Procedure
34 So. 3d 221, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6561, 2010 WL 1880496
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 2010 | Docket: 1641428
Cited 14 times | Published
of the motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to Rule 3.170(l), the trial court did not err by summarily
Category: Criminal Procedure
925 So. 2d 1076, 2006 WL 625396
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2006 | Docket: 2482404
Cited 14 times | Published
motion because they could have been raised in a rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea.
To the extent that
Category: Criminal Procedure
820 So. 2d 1078, 2002 WL 1539652
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2002 | Docket: 1394180
Cited 14 times | Published
indicates his desire to avail himself of the rule 3.170(l) procedure, the trial court must appoint conflict-free
Category: Criminal Procedure
818 So. 2d 567, 2002 WL 360013
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2002 | Docket: 1652880
Cited 14 times | Published
170(f). The motion is facially insufficient. Rule 3.170(f) permits a motion to withdraw plea to be filed
Category: Criminal Procedure
286 So. 2d 532
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1973 | Docket: 430530
Cited 14 times | Published
and its method of selection.
As to Point I:
Rule 3.170(a), F.R.Cr.Pr., allows a defendant, "with the
Category: Criminal Procedure
840 So. 2d 1145, 2003 WL 1566558
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2003 | Docket: 1463520
Cited 13 times | Published
agreement. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l). Even if we consider Ruff's motion as
Category: Criminal Procedure
840 So. 2d 1145, 2003 WL 1566558
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2003 | Docket: 1463520
Cited 13 times | Published
agreement. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l). Even if we consider Ruff's motion as
Category: Criminal Procedure
404 So. 2d 403
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1981 | Docket: 1783278
Cited 13 times | Published
prior to imposition of sentence. Id. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f). In State v. Braverman, 348 So.2d 1183
Category: Criminal Procedure
22 So. 3d 840, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18197, 2009 WL 4110869
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2009 | Docket: 2534029
Cited 12 times | Published
[W]hen a represented defendant files a pro se rule 3.170(l) motion based on allegations giving rise to
Category: Criminal Procedure
884 So. 2d 510, 2004 WL 2289594
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2004 | Docket: 1683096
Cited 12 times | Published
Because Sharp filed the motion after sentencing, rule 3.170(l) governs the motion.
Category: Criminal Procedure
864 So. 2d 552, 2004 WL 57292
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 2004 | Docket: 1727684
Cited 12 times | Published
same manner as a nolo contendere plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170, 3.171, and 3.172.
In the instant case,
Category: Criminal Procedure
841 So. 2d 629, 2003 WL 1785916
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 2003 | Docket: 1233784
Cited 12 times | Published
sufficient cause to support the withdrawal. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f); Caddo v. State, 806 So.2d 520, 521 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
479 So. 2d 169, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2597
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1985 | Docket: 1514375
Cited 12 times | Published
nullity. The choices of the trial court under Rule 3.170 and the facts of this case were: (1) to accept
Category: Criminal Procedure
971 So. 2d 1008, 2008 WL 80164
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 2008 | Docket: 1446931
Cited 11 times | Published
court-appointed counsel to assist in filing a Rule 3.170(l) motion. See Padgett v. State, 743 So.2d 70
Category: Criminal Procedure
919 So. 2d 645, 2006 WL 167986
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2006 | Docket: 1269245
Cited 11 times | Published
Id. at 508 (emphasis in original).
"Although rule 3.170(l) does not expressly require a trial court to
Category: Criminal Procedure
913 So. 2d 514, 2005 WL 1577414
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2005 | Docket: 1331363
Cited 11 times | Published
analyzed the requirements for withdrawing pleas:
Rule 3.170(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
900 So. 2d 491, 2005 WL 106964
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 2005 | Docket: 463262
Cited 11 times | Published
Metellus's noncompliance with the plea agreement. Rule 3.170(g) permits the State to move to vacate a plea
Category: Criminal Procedure
849 So. 2d 485, 2003 WL 21673015
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2003 | Docket: 2571151
Cited 11 times | Published
court-appointed counsel to assist in filing a rule 3.170(l) motion. Padgett v. State, 743 So.2d 70, 73
Category: Criminal Procedure
810 So. 2d 988, 2002 WL 232792
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2002 | Docket: 1223481
Cited 11 times | Published
correct a sentence or probation order, (10) a rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw a plea, and (11) a rule
Category: Criminal Procedure
734 So. 2d 446, 1999 WL 270429
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1999 | Docket: 1731086
Cited 11 times | Published
pursuant to rule 3.170(l) on the grounds that his plea was involuntary. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l). In the
Category: Criminal Procedure
721 So. 2d 767, 1998 WL 796526
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1998 | Docket: 1323204
Cited 11 times | Published
consent to a plea to lesser charges; however, rule 3.170 is silent on whether the state must consent where
Category: Criminal Procedure
575 So. 2d 747, 1991 WL 22979
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1991 | Docket: 1444180
Cited 11 times | Published
State v. Ginebra, 511 So.2d 960 (Fla. 1987).
Rule 3.170(f) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
299 So. 2d 146
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1974 | Docket: 1499071
Cited 11 times | Published
for the plea as required by Criminal Procedure Rule 3.170(j) adopted by the State Supreme Court effective
Category: Criminal Procedure
141 So. 3d 701, 2014 WL 2957463, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10112
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2014 | Docket: 796838
Cited 10 times | Published
conflict-free counsel. We find error and reverse.
Rule 3.170(Z) provides for a motion to withdraw plea within
Category: Criminal Procedure
348 So. 2d 1183
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 1977 | Docket: 1760175
Cited 10 times | Published
withdraw his nolo contendere pleas pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f). The motion alleged three grounds as good
Category: Criminal Procedure
320 So. 2d 50
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 1975 | Docket: 1409010
Cited 10 times | Published
there being no express requirement therefor under Rule 3.170, RCrP, that if the trial judge indeed makes such
Category: Criminal Procedure
262 So. 2d 724
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1972 | Docket: 429179
Cited 10 times | Published
State, Fla.App. 1967, 204 So.2d 26; also see Rule 3.170, R.Cr.P., 33 F.S.A.; American Bar Association
Category: Criminal Procedure
901 So. 2d 981, 2005 WL 1109623
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2005 | Docket: 1216636
Cited 9 times | Published
of the sentence, the deadline imposed by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(1).
3. Alternatively, the Court's factual
Category: Criminal Procedure
901 So. 2d 364, 2005 WL 1047287
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 2005 | Docket: 1666240
Cited 9 times | Published
similar circumstances must be made pursuant to Rule 3.170(l), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, within
Category: Criminal Procedure
801 So. 2d 1024, 2001 WL 1635450
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2001 | Docket: 1495046
Cited 9 times | Published
order to preserve the issue for appeal. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(l). His failure to file such a motion raises
Category: Criminal Procedure
779 So. 2d 419, 2000 WL 1468584
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2000 | Docket: 1521028
Cited 9 times | Published
days after rendition of a sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l). The trial court correctly reasoned that
Category: Criminal Procedure
606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1992 | Docket: 2191048
Cited 9 times | Published
follow the language set out in 528 So.2d at 1180.
RULE 3.170. PLEAS
(a) Types of Plea; Court's Discretion
Category: Criminal Procedure
316 So. 2d 279
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1975 | Docket: 1456151
Cited 9 times | Published
guilty plea inquiry, and it did not comply with Rule 3.170(j). We wish to emphasize, however, that the responsibility
Category: Criminal Procedure
294 So. 2d 122
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1974 | Docket: 1736296
Cited 9 times | Published
the plea of guilty as required by newly adopted Rule 3.170(j), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F
Category: Criminal Procedure
272 So. 2d 847
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1973 | Docket: 1644664
Cited 9 times | Published
his plea of nolo contendere as contemplated by Rule 3.170 not only demonstrates the fallacy of defendant's
Category: Criminal Procedure
74 So. 3d 118, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14044, 2011 WL 3905061
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2011 | Docket: 2358525
Cited 8 times | Published
plea, as contemplated by the rule. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f) ("The court may in its discretion, and
Category: Criminal Procedure
998 So. 2d 1197, 2009 WL 77987
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 2009 | Docket: 1701651
Cited 8 times | Published
Alfred timely appeals the denial of his pro se rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw his no contest plea, as
Category: Criminal Procedure
922 So. 2d 1088, 2006 WL 708558
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2006 | Docket: 1282389
Cited 8 times | Published
withdraw a plea after sentencing pursuant to Rule 3.170(l). Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h). When such a motion
Category: Criminal Procedure
919 So. 2d 669, 2006 WL 197215
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2006 | Docket: 1269121
Cited 8 times | Published
Procedure 9.140, such a claim should be raised in a rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea.
Taylor now urges
Category: Criminal Procedure
897 So. 2d 553, 2005 WL 771325
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2005 | Docket: 2558806
Cited 8 times | Published
indicates his desire to avail himself of the rule 3.170(l) procedure, the trial court must appoint conflict-free
Category: Criminal Procedure
782 So. 2d 513, 2001 WL 326666
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2001 | Docket: 1512088
Cited 8 times | Published
signed a plea which addressed some of what Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170 requires that a defendant understand before
Category: Criminal Procedure
472 So. 2d 1383, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1855
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1985 | Docket: 1793254
Cited 8 times | Published
382 So.2d at 1300 (citation omitted). See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f).
In Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257
Category: Criminal Procedure
742 F.2d 606, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18332
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 24, 1984 | Docket: 486751
Cited 8 times | Published
the trial judge the same discretion. See FLA.R.CRIM.P. 3.170(j); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.171(c), 272 So.2d 65
Category: Criminal Procedure
433 So. 2d 1311
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1983 | Docket: 1425858
Cited 8 times | Published
is a factual basis for the guilty plea. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j). The purpose of the requirement that a
Category: Criminal Procedure
354 So. 2d 1277
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1978 | Docket: 1682189
Cited 8 times | Published
outlined a factual basis as required under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j); however, no mention was made of the value
Category: Criminal Procedure
308 So. 2d 1
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1975 | Docket: 1251193
Cited 8 times | Published
shall be made in writing under the provisions of Rule 3.170(a)."
By express terms of Cr.P.R. 3.160(a), the
Category: Criminal Procedure
153 So. 3d 399, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20571, 2014 WL 7183249
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2014 | Docket: 60245241
Cited 7 times | Published
withdraw the plea prior to sentencing. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f). The trial court conducted an evidentiary
Category: Criminal Procedure
114 So. 3d 890, 2013 WL 2096350
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2013 | Docket: 60232014
Cited 7 times | Published
specifically support Griffin’s argument regarding his rule 3.170(£) motion. In Kilgore, the defendant was indicted
Category: Criminal Procedure
971 So. 2d 212, 2008 WL 34806
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 2008 | Docket: 1446548
Cited 7 times | Published
Johnson filed a motion to withdraw plea under rule 3.170(f), alleging that his trial counsel failed to
Category: Criminal Procedure
932 So. 2d 1169, 2006 WL 1788559
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2006 | Docket: 1981172
Cited 7 times | Published
pursuant to Florida Statute Criminal Procedure Rule 3.170(l)." In Mourra, this court stated, "We are not
Category: Criminal Procedure
909 So. 2d 364, 2005 WL 1787446
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 2005 | Docket: 1663292
Cited 7 times | Published
accept a plea negotiated by the parties. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(a); 3.171(d).
While Scott may believe Judge
Category: Criminal Procedure
884 So. 2d 1023, 2004 WL 2289617
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2004 | Docket: 1683121
Cited 7 times | Published
valid basis to seek withdrawal of a plea under rule 3.170(l). See Cherry, 837 So.2d at 598 ("A defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
835 So. 2d 402, 2003 WL 202675
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2003 | Docket: 1754995
Cited 7 times | Published
plea. A motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to rule 3.170(2) is a "critical stage in the direct criminal
Category: Criminal Procedure
821 So. 2d 1267, 2002 WL 1769002
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 2002 | Docket: 1236384
Cited 7 times | Published
after the rendition of his sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l) (allowing thirty days after the rendition
Category: Criminal Procedure
806 So. 2d 520, 2001 WL 1283987
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2001 | Docket: 1713033
Cited 7 times | Published
court shall allow the plea to be withdrawn. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f). Threats and coercion, if established
Category: Criminal Procedure
747 So. 2d 439, 1999 WL 1191447
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1999 | Docket: 1475793
Cited 7 times | Published
plea. This court has jurisdiction. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(1); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(iii).
Category: Criminal Procedure
643 So. 2d 677, 1994 WL 551473
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1994 | Docket: 1493223
Cited 7 times | Published
"[m]otion denied" and proceeded to sentencing. Rule 3.170(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires
Category: Criminal Procedure
412 So. 2d 354
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1982 | Docket: 528418
Cited 7 times | Published
nullity. The choices of the trial court under Rule 3.170 and the facts of this case were: (1) to accept
Category: Criminal Procedure
137 So. 3d 542, 2014 WL 1374046, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5161
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 2014 | Docket: 60240354
Cited 6 times | Published
Comparato’s holding that the mandatory language of rule 3.170, requiring a PSI for all first-time felony offenders
Category: Criminal Procedure
125 So. 3d 733, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 727, 2013 WL 5641531, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2290
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2013 | Docket: 60236060
Cited 6 times | Published
140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a)-(e)4 except as provided by law.
Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170((). The requirement of manifest injustice
Category: Criminal Procedure
38 So. 3d 802, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8233, 2010 WL 2330243
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 2010 | Docket: 1184228
Cited 6 times | Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, that rule 3.170(l) did not apply to admissions to violations
Category: Criminal Procedure
988 So. 2d 74, 2008 WL 2744496
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2008 | Docket: 1722138
Cited 6 times | Published
motion should have been stricken because "[a] rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea filed by a criminal
Category: Criminal Procedure
929 So. 2d 673, 2006 WL 1359343
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2006 | Docket: 1422631
Cited 6 times | Published
unauthorized. We remand with directions to strike the Rule 3.170(l) motion.
CAUSE REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
SHARP
Category: Criminal Procedure
831 So. 2d 716, 2002 WL 31431560
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2002 | Docket: 1723014
Cited 6 times | Published
of Criminal Procedure 3.850. This was error. Rule 3.170(l), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, clearly
Category: Criminal Procedure
762 So. 2d 990, 2000 WL 827072
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 2000 | Docket: 1311161
Cited 6 times | Published
permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn...." Rule 3.170(f) should be liberally construed in favor of
Category: Criminal Procedure
578 So. 2d 769, 1991 WL 54130
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1991 | Docket: 440939
Cited 6 times | Published
alleging in part that: (1) the requirements of rule 3.170 were not satisfied; (2) the requirements of rule
Category: Criminal Procedure
490 So. 2d 80, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 193
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1986 | Docket: 1488869
Cited 6 times | Published
for the withdrawal of his plea, as required by rule 3.170(f), his motion should have been granted. I would
Category: Criminal Procedure
490 So. 2d 80, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 193
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1986 | Docket: 1488869
Cited 6 times | Published
for the withdrawal of his plea, as required by rule 3.170(f), his motion should have been granted. I would
Category: Criminal Procedure
318 So. 2d 571
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1975 | Docket: 1476595
Cited 6 times | Published
plea without first determining, as required by Rule 3.170(j) RCrP, that there was a factual basis for the
Category: Criminal Procedure
308 So. 2d 586
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1975 | Docket: 1672873
Cited 6 times | Published
acceptance of the plea. Appellant contends that Rule 3.170(j) RCrP mandates that the factual basis be determined
Category: Criminal Procedure
303 So. 2d 417
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1974 | Docket: 1691662
Cited 6 times | Published
the acceptance of a guilty plea as required by Rule 3.170(j), CrPR.[1] Appellant does not claim that his
Category: Criminal Procedure
84 So. 3d 396, 2012 WL 987405, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4593
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2012 | Docket: 2415076
Cited 5 times | Published
dismissed, 598 So.2d 78 (Fla. 1992).
Pursuant to rule 3.170(l), Golden's counsel had until April 4, 2010
Category: Criminal Procedure
33 So. 3d 802, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5531, 2010 WL 1641464
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2010 | Docket: 285216
Cited 5 times | Published
who is represented by counsel files a pro se rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw a plea based on allegations
Category: Criminal Procedure
24 So. 3d 636, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19068, 2009 WL 4640660
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2009 | Docket: 1152634
Cited 5 times | Published
follow when a represented defendant files a pro se rule 3.170(l) motion based on allegations giving rise to
Category: Criminal Procedure
19 So. 3d 1024, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12833, 2009 WL 2762723
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 2009 | Docket: 1651025
Cited 5 times | Published
hearing.
FAILURE TO APPOINT CONFLICT-FREE COUNSEL
Rule 3.170(l) permits a defendant to file a motion to withdraw
Category: Criminal Procedure
979 So. 2d 1066, 2008 WL 828953
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2008 | Docket: 1714233
Cited 5 times | Published
to be withdrawn before sentencing. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f). Since it is fundamental error to accept
Category: Criminal Procedure
927 So. 2d 1064, 2006 WL 1236051
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2006 | Docket: 1765270
Cited 5 times | Published
when the plea was entered involuntarily. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)c.
Category: Criminal Procedure
925 So. 2d 383, 2006 WL 625746
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2006 | Docket: 471670
Cited 5 times | Published
presented in, and preserved by, the filing of a rule 3.170(l) motion would be hollow indeed if the defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
925 So. 2d 383, 2006 WL 625746
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2006 | Docket: 471670
Cited 5 times | Published
presented in, and preserved by, the filing of a rule 3.170(l) motion would be hollow indeed if the defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
907 So. 2d 683, 2005 WL 1789091
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 2005 | Docket: 233846
Cited 5 times | Published
A motion to withdraw plea filed pursuant to rule 3.170 is a critical stage of the proceedings in the
Category: Criminal Procedure
893 So. 2d 647, 2005 WL 356612
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2005 | Docket: 1720741
Cited 5 times | Published
withdraw his plea to counts I and II, pursuant to rule 3.170(l) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
865 So. 2d 661, 2004 WL 298407
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2004 | Docket: 1674328
Cited 5 times | Published
Since a motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l) is a "critical stage" in which the defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
789 So. 2d 1082, 2001 WL 673580
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2001 | Docket: 2513257
Cited 5 times | Published
timely filed under rule 3.170(l). We cannot agree with the state's argument.
Rule 3.170(l) provides: "A
Category: Criminal Procedure
786 So. 2d 43, 2001 WL 527530
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2001 | Docket: 1278436
Cited 5 times | Published
Within ten days of sentencing appellant filed a rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea and vacate sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
246 F.3d 1300
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 16, 2001 | Docket: 2132881
Cited 5 times | Published
appeal, Hardy filed a motion pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f) to withdraw his plea. Upon Hardy’s request
Category: Criminal Procedure
783 So. 2d 288, 2001 WL 280032
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2001 | Docket: 1259526
Cited 5 times | Published
State, 260 So.2d 198, 200 (Fla.1972). Pursuant to rule 3.170(f) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
767 So. 2d 604, 2000 WL 1283821
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2000 | Docket: 1661501
Cited 5 times | Published
denied appellant's motion. We affirm.
Pursuant to rule 3.170(l), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, appellant
Category: Criminal Procedure
721 So. 2d 776, 1998 WL 821789
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 1998 | Docket: 1323396
Cited 5 times | Published
permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn...." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f). This rule should be liberally construed
Category: Criminal Procedure
700 So. 2d 384, 1997 WL 422525
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1997 | Docket: 1373634
Cited 5 times | Published
rule to address the situation or have amended Rule 3.170 as it did. Accordingly, an instance in which
Category: Criminal Procedure
614 So. 2d 605, 1993 WL 43868
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1993 | Docket: 1509818
Cited 5 times | Published
the witness's mother were inadmissible under rule 3.170(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and
Category: Criminal Procedure
406 So. 2d 1148
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1981 | Docket: 449796
Cited 5 times | Published
significance of the plea and its voluntariness." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j) (1972). However, as noted above, the presently
Category: Criminal Procedure
370 So. 2d 1231
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1979 | Docket: 1722529
Cited 5 times | Published
to him a number of times concerning it.
Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j) requires that the court shall not accept
Category: Criminal Procedure
370 So. 2d 1231
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1979 | Docket: 1722529
Cited 5 times | Published
to him a number of times concerning it.
Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j) requires that the court shall not accept
Category: Criminal Procedure
36 So. 3d 883, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7695, 2010 WL 2219192
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2010 | Docket: 2409622
Cited 4 times | Published
concluding that the claim was untimely under both rule 3.170 and rule 3.850. In a motion for rehearing, Haager
Category: Criminal Procedure
1 So. 3d 1243, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1111, 2009 WL 321569
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2009 | Docket: 1653757
Cited 4 times | Published
140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a)-(e) except as provided by law." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l) (2008). Here, the defendant based her
Category: Criminal Procedure
973 So. 2d 679, 2008 WL 373626
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2008 | Docket: 1292789
Cited 4 times | Published
distinction that would render J.D.F. inapplicable here. Rule 3.170(f) allows a defendant to move to withdraw his
Category: Criminal Procedure
961 So. 2d 1036, 2007 WL 2043449
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2007 | Docket: 468759
Cited 4 times | Published
WL 1362862 (Fla. May 10, 2007) (quoting Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f)) (emphasis added). Our supreme court
Category: Criminal Procedure
959 So. 2d 830, 2007 WL 1988829
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 2007 | Docket: 1525791
Cited 4 times | Published
("A motion to withdraw plea filed pursuant to rule 3.170 is a critical stage of the proceedings in the
Category: Criminal Procedure
947 So. 2d 1208, 2007 WL 186802
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 2007 | Docket: 1376525
Cited 4 times | Published
his murder trial is enough to meet the test of Rule 3.170(f). Failure to inform him of this collateral
Category: Criminal Procedure
841 So. 2d 648, 2003 WL 1823464
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 2003 | Docket: 2556221
Cited 4 times | Published
1999). A motion to withdraw plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l) is such a critical stage of the criminal proceedings
Category: Criminal Procedure
838 So. 2d 1213, 2003 WL 727792
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2003 | Docket: 715405
Cited 4 times | Published
advise and assist with motions filed pursuant to rule 3.170(l). See Lester v. State, 820 So.2d 1078 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
817 So. 2d 1009, 2002 WL 1084166
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2002 | Docket: 1430136
Cited 4 times | Published
established a procedure, which has been codified in rule 3.170(g), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, whereby
Category: Criminal Procedure
804 So. 2d 564, 2002 WL 63354
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2002 | Docket: 1699446
Cited 4 times | Published
actual admission of having done so.
[3] See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(e); Licata v. State, 81 Fla. 649, 88 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
765 So. 2d 195, 2000 WL 990929
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2000 | Docket: 164731
Cited 4 times | Published
filed a motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. At the
Category: Criminal Procedure
678 So. 2d 489, 1996 WL 470876
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 1996 | Docket: 1470812
Cited 4 times | Published
otherwise remained mute on this issue.[10]But compare Rule 3.170(c), Fla. R.Crim. P. ("If a defendant stands mute
Category: Criminal Procedure
678 So. 2d 489, 1996 WL 470876
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 1996 | Docket: 1470812
Cited 4 times | Published
otherwise remained mute on this issue.[10]But compare Rule 3.170(c), Fla. R.Crim. P. ("If a defendant stands mute
Category: Criminal Procedure
661 So. 2d 95, 1995 WL 521091
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 1995 | Docket: 1526490
Cited 4 times | Published
pursuant to rule 3.170 and rule 3.172 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Rule 3.170 provides in
Category: Criminal Procedure
667 So. 2d 242, 1995 WL 497003
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1995 | Docket: 144227
Cited 4 times | Published
addressed to the discretion of the trial court. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f). However, such discretion is not unbridled
Category: Criminal Procedure
509 So. 2d 1360, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1805
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 1987 | Docket: 1715347
Cited 4 times | Published
the court and of the prosecuting attorney. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(g). Since the prosecuting attorney did not
Category: Criminal Procedure
468 So. 2d 253, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 498
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1985 | Docket: 1402265
Cited 4 times | Published
document and freely and voluntarily signed it. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j). The defense attorney stipulated that
Category: Criminal Procedure
359 So. 2d 564
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1978 | Docket: 1735697
Cited 4 times | Published
Prohibition which we grant. At issue is Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(g)[1] and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(f)[2] as they
Category: Criminal Procedure
338 So. 2d 547
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1976 | Docket: 1511876
Cited 4 times | Published
court failed to comply with the provision of Rule 3.170(j) RCrP which required that there be a determination
Category: Criminal Procedure
316 So. 2d 276
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1975 | Docket: 410788
Cited 4 times | Published
that "the factual basis clause in that rule [Rule 3.170(j)] is inapplicable in cases where the guilty
Category: Criminal Procedure
917 F.3d 1333
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 6, 2019 | Docket: 14627611
Cited 3 times | Published
adjudicate Gandy guilty of that charge. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170.
The following hypothetical illustrates
Category: Criminal Procedure
183 So. 3d 1146, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19519, 2015 WL 9491860
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2015 | Docket: 60252938
Cited 3 times | Published
passed since Anderson’s initial appeal. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(Z). Our order was without prejudice to pursue
Category: Criminal Procedure
129 So. 3d 446, 2013 WL 6865084, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20726
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2013 | Docket: 60237400
Cited 3 times | Published
denying his motion to withdraw his plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(i). Appellant moved to withdraw his plea
Category: Criminal Procedure
128 So. 3d 898, 2013 WL 6635915, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19965
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2013 | Docket: 60237202
Cited 3 times | Published
a timely rule 3.170(Z) motion to withdraw plea, which remains pending.
A timely rule 3.170(£) motion
Category: Criminal Procedure
24 So. 3d 1211, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20017, 2009 WL 5064039
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2009 | Docket: 1648344
Cited 3 times | Published
DCA 2008). In considering a motion filed under rule 3.170(f), "a trial court is required to allow withdrawal
Category: Criminal Procedure
22 So. 3d 793, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17302, 2009 WL 3878544
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 2009 | Docket: 1639634
Cited 3 times | Published
when a represented defendant brings a pro se rule 3.170(l) motion based on conflict with counsel:
[W]hen
Category: Criminal Procedure
18 So. 3d 1190, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14497, 2009 WL 3108569
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2009 | Docket: 1179741
Cited 3 times | Published
a represented defendant files a timely pro se Rule 3.170(l) motion, the trial court should first determine
Category: Criminal Procedure
974 So. 2d 582, 2008 WL 441953
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2008 | Docket: 1717445
Cited 3 times | Published
filed a timely motion to withdraw his plea under rule 3.170(l), there is no guarantee that he would have
Category: Criminal Procedure
964 So. 2d 803, 2007 WL 2710885
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 2007 | Docket: 1182648
Cited 3 times | Published
that the appellant's motion was untimely. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l). Rendition of sentence occurred on November
Category: Criminal Procedure
945 So. 2d 657, 2007 WL 101984
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2007 | Docket: 1725420
Cited 3 times | Published
Where a defendant files a facially insufficient rule 3.170(l) motion, he is not entitled to an evidentiary
Category: Criminal Procedure
942 So. 2d 407, 2006 WL 3229930
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2006 | Docket: 1471518
Cited 3 times | Published
appendix to this opinion.[1]
*408 AMENDMENTS
Rule 3.170(f), Withdrawal of Plea of Guilty, which currently
Category: Criminal Procedure
939 So. 2d 1196, 2006 WL 3019934
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2006 | Docket: 2570896
Cited 3 times | Published
se motion to withdraw his plea in each case. A rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea filed by a criminal
Category: Criminal Procedure
914 So. 2d 519, 2005 WL 3116102
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 2005 | Docket: 1781716
Cited 3 times | Published
appeal by bringing his involuntariness claim under rule 3.170(l), which concerns a motion to withdraw a plea
Category: Criminal Procedure
911 So. 2d 763, 2005 WL 2095666
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2005 | Docket: 1501198
Cited 3 times | Published
appropriate to expand the language of former rule 3.170(j) (deleted) and establish a separate rule. Incorporates
Category: Criminal Procedure
901 So. 2d 420, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7565, 2005 WL 1185820
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2005 | Docket: 1666229
Cited 3 times | Published
reasoned as follows:
The Fifth District held that rule 3.170(g)(2)(A) is not jurisdictional because it permits
Category: Criminal Procedure
900 So. 2d 732, 2005 WL 957601
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2005 | Docket: 1161860
Cited 3 times | Published
timely motion to withdraw a plea is filed under rule 3.170(l) and is pending at the time of the filing of
Category: Criminal Procedure
895 So. 2d 453, 2005 WL 263770
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2005 | Docket: 1674358
Cited 3 times | Published
permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f).[3] Here, because Wagner *456 moved to
Category: Criminal Procedure
877 So. 2d 938, 2004 WL 1666417
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 2004 | Docket: 1684616
Cited 3 times | Published
allegation" that was not a ground for relief under rule 3.170(l). Harris was therefore not entitled to either
Category: Criminal Procedure
872 So. 2d 447, 2004 WL 1071798
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 2004 | Docket: 1476158
Cited 3 times | Published
850. It treated the motion as one pursuant to rule 3.170(l) and denied it as untimely because it was filed
Category: Criminal Procedure
858 So. 2d 1213, 2003 WL 22657891
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2003 | Docket: 831271
Cited 3 times | Published
the trial court's summary denial of appellant's Rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw a number of nolo contendere
Category: Criminal Procedure
820 So. 2d 1026, 2002 WL 1430581
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2002 | Docket: 1362278
Cited 3 times | Published
summarily denied the motion and this appeal followed.
Rule 3.170(f) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
826 So. 2d 324, 2002 WL 440552
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2002 | Docket: 1662871
Cited 3 times | Published
the specific terms of a plea agreement." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(g); see also McCoy v. State, 599 So.2d 645
Category: Criminal Procedure
807 So. 2d 817, 2002 WL 270299
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 2002 | Docket: 2556581
Cited 3 times | Published
successive because: the prior motion was filed under rule 3.170; the motion was not explicitly treated by the
Category: Criminal Procedure
801 So. 2d 973, 2001 WL 1538949
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2001 | Docket: 1495388
Cited 3 times | Published
raised in the motion were not raised in the prior rule 3.170(l) motion.
In the 3.850 motion, Harris alleged
Category: Criminal Procedure
793 So. 2d 1112, 2001 WL 1007941
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2001 | Docket: 1266271
Cited 3 times | Published
A motion to withdraw plea filed pursuant to rule 3.170(l), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, is considered
Category: Criminal Procedure
765 So. 2d 282, 2000 WL 1154044
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2000 | Docket: 428843
Cited 3 times | Published
Procedure, 685 So.2d 1253, 1257 (Fla.1996)(quoting rule 3.170).
A defendant who pleads guilty or nolo contendere
Category: Criminal Procedure
598 So. 2d 295, 1992 WL 102453
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1992 | Docket: 335247
Cited 3 times | Published
contest plea to various felony charges. We reverse.
Rule 3.170(j), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, states
Category: Criminal Procedure
585 So. 2d 350, 1991 WL 147680
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1991 | Docket: 1688613
Cited 3 times | Published
with the constitutional mandate of Boykin under rule 3.170, set out the essential requirements for taking
Category: Criminal Procedure
579 So. 2d 874, 1991 WL 85520
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 1991 | Docket: 2533626
Cited 3 times | Published
plea are provided by Rules 3.170(f) and 3.850. Rule 3.170(f) must be invoked prior to sentencing, and the
Category: Criminal Procedure
516 So. 2d 25, 1987 WL 1580
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1987 | Docket: 2568924
Cited 3 times | Published
entered by the court on Holt's behalf. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(c). The *26 clear terms of Rule 3.140(g)
Category: Criminal Procedure
488 So. 2d 127, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1057
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 1986 | Docket: 1685355
Cited 3 times | Published
So.2d 628 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); see also Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.170(f).
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
489 So. 2d 43, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 413
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1986 | Docket: 1528901
Cited 3 times | Published
So.2d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). See also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j). It is not a sufficient predicate for
Category: Criminal Procedure
467 So. 2d 462
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1985 | Docket: 1275204
Cited 3 times | Published
procedural rights. It is for that reason that Rule 3.170(i) and (j) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
399 So. 2d 1067
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1981 | Docket: 1652225
Cited 3 times | Published
offense than that charged in the information. Rule 3.170(g) reads as such:
(g) Plea of Guilty to Lesser
Category: Criminal Procedure
397 So. 2d 960
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1981 | Docket: 1357098
Cited 3 times | Published
court found a factual basis for the plea (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j)) and accepted it but did not then adjudicate
Category: Criminal Procedure
343 So. 2d 964
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1977 | Docket: 1376184
Cited 3 times | Published
apprised of the significance of her plea. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j); Brown v. State, 245 So.2d 41 (Fla. 1971);
Category: Criminal Procedure
312 So. 2d 528
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1975 | Docket: 1734553
Cited 3 times | Published
basis for the plea be shown as is required by Rule 3.170(j), F.R.Cr.P. Appellee relies upon our previous
Category: Criminal Procedure
308 So. 2d 152
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1975 | Docket: 1251534
Cited 3 times | Published
three years on the aggravated assault offense.
Rule 3.170(j), FRCrP, requires the court to determine that
Category: Criminal Procedure
299 So. 2d 649
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1974 | Docket: 1499074
Cited 3 times | Published
sentence.
We take this occasion to point out that Rule 3.170(j), RCrP,[1] which prescribes the responsibilities
Category: Criminal Procedure
266 So. 3d 1270
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2019 | Docket: 64708584
Cited 2 times | Published
pro se motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to Rule 3.170(l ).1 The trial court, relying on Cunningham
Category: Criminal Procedure
225 So. 3d 349, 2017 WL 3400608, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11433
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 2017 | Docket: 6135181
Cited 2 times | Published
and intelligently accepting a plea. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(k) (“No plea of guilty or nolo contender
Category: Criminal Procedure
201 So. 3d 145, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 96
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2016 | Docket: 3026006
Cited 2 times | Published
is silent as to whether Parrish filed a timely Rule 3.170(0 motion to withdraw his plea—a condition precedent
Category: Criminal Procedure
142 So. 3d 883, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7598, 2014 WL 2086938
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2014 | Docket: 60242230
Cited 2 times | Published
to Withdraw Plea after Sentencing, pursuant to rule 3.170(i), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. He alleged
Category: Criminal Procedure
132 So. 3d 734, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 884, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2638, 2013 WL 6331351
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2013 | Docket: 60238541
Cited 2 times | Published
the postconviction rules and the deletion of rule 3.170(i). As explained in the joint petition, the proposed
Category: Criminal Procedure
109 So. 3d 303, 2013 WL 811607, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3518
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2013 | Docket: 60229555
Cited 2 times | Published
robbery charge. He also appeals the denial of his Rule 3.170(i) motion to withdraw his plea to these charges
Category: Criminal Procedure
84 So. 3d 1242, 2012 WL 1232622
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2012 | Docket: 2415017
Cited 2 times | Published
withdraw his pleas were not filed pursuant to rule 3.170(l) because that rule applies to criminal cases
Category: Criminal Procedure
84 So. 3d 1242, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5626
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2012 | Docket: 60306638
Cited 2 times | Published
withdraw his pleas were not filed pursuant to rule 3.170(Z) because that rule applies to criminal cases
Category: Criminal Procedure
52 So. 3d 697, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12181, 2010 WL 3239148
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 2010 | Docket: 60297839
Cited 2 times | Published
it was not necessary to hold a hearing on the rule 3.170(() motion because the motion contained no factual
Category: Criminal Procedure
43 So. 3d 771, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11088, 2010 WL 2976515
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2010 | Docket: 2398744
Cited 2 times | Published
not honor his plea agreement with the State.
"[Rule] 3.170(l) permits a defendant to file a motion to withdraw
Category: Criminal Procedure
39 So. 3d 419, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9210, 2010 WL 2539429
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 2010 | Docket: 2409195
Cited 2 times | Published
of seven years’ imprisonment. He later filed a rule 3.170(£) motion to withdraw his plea, claiming it was
Category: Criminal Procedure
23 So. 3d 1263, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20399, 2009 WL 5126522
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2009 | Docket: 1181543
Cited 2 times | Published
alleged violation of the plea agreement pursuant to Rule 3.170(1), Fla. R.Crim. P., and Rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(b)
Category: Criminal Procedure
23 So. 3d 211, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18393, 2009 WL 4282283
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 2009 | Docket: 60282003
Cited 2 times | Published
2d 716, 717 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (holding that rule 3.170(i) was proper vehicle to challenge plea where
Category: Criminal Procedure
21 So. 3d 169, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16866, 2009 WL 3787776
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2009 | Docket: 1418563
Cited 2 times | Published
pro se motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l), which contains specific allegations that
Category: Criminal Procedure
15 So. 3d 833, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10128, 2009 WL 2194679
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2009 | Docket: 1191524
Cited 2 times | Published
there?"
On July 3, 2008, Mr. White filed a pro se rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea. Mr. White's motion
Category: Criminal Procedure
6 So. 3d 653, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1806, 2009 WL 530392
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2009 | Docket: 1671972
Cited 2 times | Published
move to withdraw his plea at that time.
Under rule 3.170(f), the trial court may, in its discretion, and
Category: Criminal Procedure
987 So. 2d 1279, 2008 WL 3851697
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2008 | Docket: 1392390
Cited 2 times | Published
conflict-free counsel.
A motion filed pursuant to rule 3.170(l) is a critical stage of the proceedings, thus
Category: Criminal Procedure
987 So. 2d 1279, 2008 WL 3851697
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2008 | Docket: 1392390
Cited 2 times | Published
conflict-free counsel.
A motion filed pursuant to rule 3.170(l) is a critical stage of the proceedings, thus
Category: Criminal Procedure
950 So. 2d 478, 2007 WL 518592
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2007 | Docket: 1501984
Cited 2 times | Published
similar circumstances must be made pursuant to rule 3.170(l), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, within
Category: Criminal Procedure
942 So. 2d 1024, 2006 WL 3498584
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2006 | Docket: 2543657
Cited 2 times | Published
timely-filed motion to withdraw a plea under rule 3.170(l) is pending, the final judgment of conviction
Category: Criminal Procedure
939 So. 2d 1168, 2006 WL 3018393
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2006 | Docket: 1180459
Cited 2 times | Published
also timely moved to withdraw his plea under rule 3.170(l), and contends that the court erred in denying
Category: Criminal Procedure
930 So. 2d 852, 2006 WL 1641976
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2006 | Docket: 2560829
Cited 2 times | Published
reverse and remand.
The failure to file a timely rule 3.170(l) motion does not prevent an involuntary plea
Category: Criminal Procedure
911 So. 2d 221, 2005 WL 2321699
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2005 | Docket: 1207243
Cited 2 times | Published
has any practical impact on Mr. Harris.
[2] Rule 3.170(l) contains no such requirement, but a motion
Category: Criminal Procedure
909 So. 2d 998, 2005 WL 2217967
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2005 | Docket: 1199742
Cited 2 times | Published
rendered and was timely as a motion pursuant to rule 3.170(I). It does not contain the content required
Category: Criminal Procedure
910 So. 2d 899, 2005 WL 2205355
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2005 | Docket: 2572692
Cited 2 times | Published
indicates his desire to avail himself of the rule 3.170(l) procedure, the trial court must appoint conflict-free
Category: Criminal Procedure
909 So. 2d 521, 2005 WL 2044521
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2005 | Docket: 1663222
Cited 2 times | Published
knowingly given before it is accepted. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(k). Strickland requires that counsel be
Category: Criminal Procedure
892 So. 2d 1169, 2005 WL 264106
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2005 | Docket: 472278
Cited 2 times | Published
wrong standard in denying his motion. We agree.
Rule 3.170(f) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
884 So. 2d 309, 2004 WL 1882491
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2004 | Docket: 1282138
Cited 2 times | Published
reconsideration as an unauthorized motion under rule 3.170(l). We therefore affirm the February 13 and 21
Category: Criminal Procedure
882 So. 2d 1047, 2004 WL 1845540
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 2004 | Docket: 285337
Cited 2 times | Published
not permitted to withdraw his plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l). Accordingly, the trial court abused
Category: Criminal Procedure
877 So. 2d 874, 2004 WL 1562967
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 2004 | Docket: 1684469
Cited 2 times | Published
State moved to vacate the plea pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(g).
At the hearing on the motion, the Defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
866 So. 2d 774, 2004 WL 367708
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 2004 | Docket: 1273946
Cited 2 times | Published
Wofford's timely motion to withdraw plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l). See Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h); see also Wofford
Category: Criminal Procedure
863 So. 2d 355, 2003 WL 22461298
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 2003 | Docket: 1756193
Cited 2 times | Published
pursuant to rule 3.800. Unlike rule 3.850, neither rule 3.170(l) nor rule 3.800 required the circuit *356 court
Category: Criminal Procedure
817 So. 2d 1067, 2002 WL 1231714
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2002 | Docket: 1268556
Cited 2 times | Published
30 days after rendition of the sentence. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l). The appellant argues that the Department
Category: Criminal Procedure
819 So. 2d 862, 2002 WL 1049744
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2002 | Docket: 2510062
Cited 2 times | Published
filed after sentencing, and is thus governed by rule 3.170(l), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. None
Category: Criminal Procedure
826 So. 2d 363, 2002 WL 946267
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2002 | Docket: 1197536
Cited 2 times | Published
proceeded as though the motion was filed pursuant to rule 3.170(l). That rule allows a defendant to attempt to
Category: Criminal Procedure
813 So. 2d 999, 2002 WL 429073
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2002 | Docket: 1403084
Cited 2 times | Published
would also seem inconsistent with the command of rule 3.170(f) that the court "shall on good cause, at any
Category: Criminal Procedure
647 So. 2d 900, 1994 WL 655319
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1994 | Docket: 2551973
Cited 2 times | Published
appropriate to expand the language of former rule 3.170(j) (deleted) and establish a separate rule.
Committee
Category: Criminal Procedure
518 So. 2d 1305, 1987 WL 1335
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1987 | Docket: 1778583
Cited 2 times | Published
trial judge complied with the pronouncements of Rule 3.170(j) Fla.R.Crim.P. and Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U
Category: Criminal Procedure
511 So. 2d 629, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1755
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1987 | Docket: 1338821
Cited 2 times | Published
to a crime she did not commit," the evil which rule 3.170(j) seeks to remedy.
[18] Shannon alleged in
Category: Criminal Procedure
484 So. 2d 1319, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 622
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1986 | Docket: 1343788
Cited 2 times | Published
shall be made in writing under the provisions of Rule 3.170(a);
(3) At any pre-trial conference; unless waived
Category: Criminal Procedure
471 So. 2d 1336, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1574
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1985 | Docket: 1397309
Cited 2 times | Published
shall be made in writing under the provisions of Rule 3.170(a);
"(3) At any pre-trial conference; unless
Category: Criminal Procedure
405 So. 2d 445
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1981 | Docket: 2525039
Cited 2 times | Published
court after the required inquiries to Hyde, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.170(j), 3.172, Hyde was free to withdraw his
Category: Criminal Procedure
405 So. 2d 445
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1981 | Docket: 2525039
Cited 2 times | Published
court after the required inquiries to Hyde, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.170(j), 3.172, Hyde was free to withdraw his
Category: Criminal Procedure
343 So. 2d 1247, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 4116
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1977 | Docket: 64557850
Cited 2 times | Published
appropriate to expand the language of former Rule 3.170(j) (deleted) and establish a separate rule. Incorporates
Category: Criminal Procedure
316 So. 2d 304
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1975 | Docket: 1456214
Cited 2 times | Published
basis for their guilty pleas, in violation of Rule 3.170(j), RCrP. On this point, we have previously stated
Category: Criminal Procedure
309 So. 2d 226
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1975 | Docket: 1770723
Cited 2 times | Published
compliance with the "factual basis" requirement of Rule 3.170(j) is mandatory. While the First District in
Category: Criminal Procedure
316 So. 2d 303
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1974 | Docket: 1456177
Cited 2 times | Published
the negotiated guilty pleas in accordance with Rule 3.170(j), CrPR. Since appellant has alleged no prejudice
Category: Criminal Procedure
297 So. 2d 53
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1974 | Docket: 289481
Cited 2 times | Published
remark or instructing the jury to disregard it.
Rule 3.170(f) of the Rules of Criminal Procedure provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
266 So. 3d 1270
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2019 | Docket: 64708585
Cited 1 times | Published
pro se motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to Rule 3.170(l ).1 The trial court, relying on Cunningham
Category: Criminal Procedure
230 So. 3d 20
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2017 | Docket: 6219446
Cited 1 times | Published
counsel for a motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to Rule 3.170(l). See Mosley v. State, 932 So.2d 1239 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
216 So. 3d 621
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2017 | Docket: 5813563
Cited 1 times | Published
defendant in a trial of that cause.
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f). Under this provision, a trial court
Category: Criminal Procedure
215 So. 3d 642, 2017 WL 1292365, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4781
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2017 | Docket: 4684547
Cited 1 times | Published
interplay between rules 3.170(Z) and 3.850. A timely rule 3.170(£) motion to withdraw plea, as was filed here
Category: Criminal Procedure
209 So. 3d 653, 2017 WL 456668, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1286
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 2017 | Docket: 4579991
Cited 1 times | Published
asserting that his pleas were involuntary. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l). The trial court summarily denied the
Category: Criminal Procedure
215 So. 3d 71, 2016 WL 5804864, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14843
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2016 | Docket: 60265069
Cited 1 times | Published
State, 943 So.2d 899 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(a); Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.075(a). It would
Category: Criminal Procedure
204 So. 3d 950, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14506
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2016 | Docket: 63630695
Cited 1 times | Published
conflict-free counsel and to an evidentiary hearing under Rule 3.170(i), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm
Category: Criminal Procedure
180 So. 3d 235, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18972, 2015 WL 9264083
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2015 | Docket: 60252352
Cited 1 times | Published
the underlying order. Fla. R. App. P. 9.020(i). Rule 3.170(Z) requires that the motion to withdraw plea
Category: Criminal Procedure
177 So. 3d 70, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15173, 2015 WL 5949117
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2015 | Docket: 2919901
Cited 1 times | Published
pro se motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to rule 3.170(i), which contains specific allegations that
Category: Criminal Procedure
132 So. 3d 882, 2014 WL 481283, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1670
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2014 | Docket: 60238564
Cited 1 times | Published
to withdraw plea after sentencing pursuant to rule 3.170(0 are narrower than those for a motion filed
Category: Criminal Procedure
119 So. 3d 528, 2013 WL 4265550, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12834
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2013 | Docket: 60233636
Cited 1 times | Published
The trial court erred because a motion under rule 3.170(Z) is not a collateral proceeding. In many ways
Category: Criminal Procedure
114 So. 3d 1107, 2013 WL 2661693, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9427
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2013 | Docket: 60231756
Cited 1 times | Published
his plea shortly after sentencing. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(i). Among his several grounds were allegations
Category: Criminal Procedure
113 So. 3d 110, 2013 WL 2113022, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7974
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 2013 | Docket: 60231418
Cited 1 times | Published
JACOBUS and BERGER, JJ., concur.
. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(Z).
. Smith was sentenced on February
Category: Criminal Procedure
111 So. 3d 205, 2013 WL 1136238, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4425
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2013 | Docket: 60230771
Cited 1 times | Published
sentencing, it could have been considered as a rule 3.170(i) motion to withdraw his plea, which would not
Category: Criminal Procedure
110 So. 3d 3, 2012 WL 5499990
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2012 | Docket: 60230273
Cited 1 times | Published
conflict-free counsel to assist Pagan with his rule 3.170(7) motion. An evidentiary hearing was scheduled
Category: Criminal Procedure
72 So. 3d 290, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16514, 2011 WL 4949811
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2011 | Docket: 2357889
Cited 1 times | Published
governs motions to withdraw pleas after sentencing. Rule 3.170(Z) states that:
A defendant who pleads guilty
Category: Criminal Procedure
69 So. 3d 357, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14230, 2011 WL 3962893
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 2011 | Docket: 1908009
Cited 1 times | Published
Crane's sentencing to occur after his trial.
Rule 3.170(f) provides that "[t]he court may in its discretion
Category: Criminal Procedure
126 So. 3d 277, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10183, 2011 WL 2555711
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2011 | Docket: 60236386
Cited 1 times | Published
pro se motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to rule 3.170(£), which contains specific allegations that
Category: Criminal Procedure
62 So. 3d 1236, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8947, 2011 WL 2341397
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2011 | Docket: 2326909
Cited 1 times | Published
the plea was not entered voluntarily. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c)
Category: Criminal Procedure
57 So. 3d 972, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4332, 2011 WL 1135462
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2011 | Docket: 60299223
Cited 1 times | Published
court noted, “we are here on two motions,” the Rule 3.170(¿) and a Rule 3.850 motion. The court then explained
Category: Criminal Procedure
58 So. 3d 912, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3479, 2011 WL 904582
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2011 | Docket: 60299546
Cited 1 times | Published
indictment, and that the sixty day time frame in Rule 3.170(g)(2)(A) did not apply because Puentes had not
Category: Criminal Procedure
38 So. 3d 869, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9135, 2010 WL 2507034
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 2010 | Docket: 1658007
Cited 1 times | Published
pro se motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l), which contains specific allegations that
Category: Criminal Procedure
31 So. 3d 948, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4677, 2010 WL 1404386
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 2010 | Docket: 2515389
Cited 1 times | Published
October 15, 2009. The motion was untimely under rule 3.170(l), which requires filing within thirty days
Category: Criminal Procedure
24 So. 3d 770, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20557, 2009 WL 5150066
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2009 | Docket: 1648855
Cited 1 times | Published
3.172(i). Rule 3.170(f) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provides:
Rule 3.170. Pleas
* * *
Category: Criminal Procedure
24 So. 3d 726, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20010, 2009 WL 4928025
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2009 | Docket: 1151705
Cited 1 times | Published
trial court held an evidentiary hearing on the rule 3.170 motion, at which Haynes testified that his counsel
Category: Criminal Procedure
12 So. 3d 1290, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10353, 2009 WL 2244195
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 2009 | Docket: 390136
Cited 1 times | Published
1st DCA 2001) (noting that the time limit under rule 3.170(l) is jurisdictional). We also agree with the
Category: Criminal Procedure
14 So. 3d 252, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9165, 2009 WL 1940754
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 2009 | Docket: 2542225
Cited 1 times | Published
indicates his desire to avail himself of the rule 3.170(l) procedure. Lester v. State, 820 So.2d 1078
Category: Criminal Procedure
8 So. 3d 504, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5421, 2009 WL 1393402
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2009 | Docket: 1415395
Cited 1 times | Published
sentence, and the order denying the appellant's rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw his plea, but we remand
Category: Criminal Procedure
9 So. 3d 721, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3435, 2009 WL 1066292
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2009 | Docket: 1221878
Cited 1 times | Published
withdrawal did not include coercion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l) (allowing motion to withdraw plea after
Category: Criminal Procedure
6 So. 3d 122, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3252, 2009 WL 1025878
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2009 | Docket: 308309
Cited 1 times | Published
case become final. See In re Amendments to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170 & 3.172, 953 So.2d 513, 518 (Fla. 2007);
Category: Criminal Procedure
7 So. 3d 635, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3180, 2009 WL 996362
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 2009 | Docket: 2572806
Cited 1 times | Published
Noah Smith, pro se, appeals the denial of his rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw his plea as involuntary
Category: Criminal Procedure
10 So. 3d 660, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2891, 2009 WL 928480
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2009 | Docket: 1642402
Cited 1 times | Published
70, 72-73 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (holding that a rule 3.170(0 motion to withdraw a plea after sentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
994 So. 2d 1252, 2008 WL 4998763
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 2008 | Docket: 1454427
Cited 1 times | Published
counsel to advise and assist him in preparing a rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw the plea. 959 So.2d 1254
Category: Criminal Procedure
994 So. 2d 1209, 2008 WL 4889132
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2008 | Docket: 392821
Cited 1 times | Published
to sentencing should have been granted. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f). Arzola entered a plea conditioned on
Category: Criminal Procedure
995 So. 2d 1008, 2008 WL 4682299
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2008 | Docket: 2535107
Cited 1 times | Published
knowingly and voluntarily in accordance with Rule 3.170(k) and with the consent of the prosecutor and
Category: Criminal Procedure
989 So. 2d 702, 2008 WL 3851435
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2008 | Docket: 449948
Cited 1 times | Published
appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The dismissal of appellant's rule 3.170(l) motion as untimely is affirmed without prejudice
Category: Criminal Procedure
981 So. 2d 676, 2008 WL 2150091
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2008 | Docket: 467976
Cited 1 times | Published
"A motion to withdraw plea filed pursuant to rule 3.170 is a critical stage of the proceedings in the
Category: Criminal Procedure
972 So. 2d 1035, 2008 WL 141096
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2008 | Docket: 2559901
Cited 1 times | Published
which were not preserved for appeal by his pro se rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea. This affirmance is
Category: Criminal Procedure
972 So. 2d 1029, 2008 WL 110117
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 2008 | Docket: 2580900
Cited 1 times | Published
we said:
"the thirty-day window provided in Rule 3.170(l) is a critical stage of the criminal proceedings
Category: Criminal Procedure
967 So. 2d 1100, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18126, 2007 WL 3355066
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2007 | Docket: 64853034
Cited 1 times | Published
considered the motion to withdraw under rule 3.170(Z) and not rule 3.170(f). In a concurring opinion, Justice
Category: Criminal Procedure
961 So. 2d 1098, 323 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1817
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2007 | Docket: 468755
Cited 1 times | Published
written order disposing of the motion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l); Smallwood v. State, 911 So.2d 849, 850
Category: Criminal Procedure
960 So. 2d 888, 2007 WL 2043455
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2007 | Docket: 1726300
Cited 1 times | Published
motion to withdraw was timely filed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l). Second, the filing of the motion suspended
Category: Criminal Procedure
947 So. 2d 663, 2007 WL 188356
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 2007 | Docket: 2555920
Cited 1 times | Published
direct appeal from a motion to withdraw plea under rule 3.170(f). Although the postconviction court is correct
Category: Criminal Procedure
940 So. 2d 613, 2006 WL 3103151
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2006 | Docket: 1523874
Cited 1 times | Published
proceedings.
Lopez's attorney initially filed a rule 3.170(l) motion claiming that Lopez did not realize
Category: Criminal Procedure
938 So. 2d 644, 2006 WL 2871861
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2006 | Docket: 1673670
Cited 1 times | Published
she was affected adversely by medication.[3]
Rule 3.170(l) provides for the withdrawal of a plea after
Category: Criminal Procedure
909 So. 2d 428, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12765, 2005 WL 1991759
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 2005 | Docket: 64840151
Cited 1 times | Published
sufficient cause to support the withdrawal. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f).
On appeal, Morris contends his defense
Category: Criminal Procedure
907 So. 2d 550, 2005 WL 1459132
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2005 | Docket: 459501
Cited 1 times | Published
(Fla.2005). A motion to withdraw a plea under Rule 3.170(f) also allows the withdrawal of a plea only
Category: Criminal Procedure
864 So. 2d 521, 2004 WL 40567
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 2004 | Docket: 1426077
Cited 1 times | Published
thirty days after sentencing. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f) and (l). Rule 3.170(l) states that a defendant may
Category: Criminal Procedure
830 So. 2d 243, 2002 WL 31507141
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2002 | Docket: 235325
Cited 1 times | Published
Hulett, acting pro se, failed to *244 realize rule 3.170(f) only applies to motions filed before sentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
823 So. 2d 830, 2002 WL 1968829
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 2002 | Docket: 1512800
Cited 1 times | Published
was not a 6-year youthful offender sentence. Rule 3.170(l) gave him 30 days to file a motion to withdraw
Category: Criminal Procedure
816 So. 2d 781, 2002 WL 940168
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2002 | Docket: 1557597
Cited 1 times | Published
to a misdemeanor charge at first appearance. Rule 3.170 further provides that, upon such a plea, the
Category: Criminal Procedure
784 So. 2d 482, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3225, 2001 WL 245755
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2001 | Docket: 64805190
Cited 1 times | Published
voluntary plea.
The authority for the motion was rule 3.170(ü), which provides:
Motion to Withdraw the Plea
Category: Criminal Procedure
665 So. 2d 348, 1995 WL 761038
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1995 | Docket: 1351674
Cited 1 times | Published
significance of the plea and its voluntariness." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(k). We have recently noted that "[s]uch a
Category: Criminal Procedure
448 So. 2d 1240
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1984 | Docket: 429730
Cited 1 times | Published
that the plea was in his best interest. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j), 3.172(d). The record reveals that after
Category: Criminal Procedure
317 So. 2d 851
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1975 | Docket: 1419352
Cited 1 times | Published
case is silent as to a previous felony offense. Rule 3.170, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
272 So. 2d 513, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4898
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1973 | Docket: 64530084
Cited 1 times | Published
BOYD, J.,
concurs as to Rule 3.170; dissents as to Rule 3.140.
3.140. Indictments; Informations.
(a)
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2025 | Docket: 70914227
Published
hearing on his motion. See id. at n.9 (“Although rule
3.170(l) does not expressly require a trial court to
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2025 | Docket: 70690152
Published
open plea, as contemplated
by the rule.”); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f) (“The court may in its
discretion, and
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2025 | Docket: 70690155
Published
open plea, as contemplated
by the rule.”); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f) (“The court may in its
discretion, and
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2025 | Docket: 70690154
Published
open plea, as contemplated
by the rule.”); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f) (“The court may in its
discretion, and
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2025 | Docket: 70690157
Published
alleging that his plea was involuntary. See
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l), 3.850(a)(5). Without this term in the
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2025 | Docket: 70454061
Published
those post-plea issues by appropriate motion: rule
3.170(l) motion for involuntary pleas, and objection
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2025 | Docket: 70000165
Published
when
a represented defendant files a pro se rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea
based on allegations
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2025 | Docket: 69620090
Published
treated as a motion to
withdraw plea. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l). The notice of appeal
was filed first
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2025 | Docket: 69554643
Published
performance of his plea
agreement. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f), (l).
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2024 | Docket: 69485907
Published
2
Florida law states that "[a] rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw a plea
is a critical stage
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2024 | Docket: 69485906
Published
2
Florida law states that "[a] rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw a plea
is a critical stage
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2024 | Docket: 69324004
Published
been by a motion to withdraw
the plea. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f).
Accordingly, we were correct
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 2024 | Docket: 69171794
Published
rendition re-starting the deadlines contained in
Rule 3.170(l).
In the second place, according to
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 2024 | Docket: 69151094
Published
[W]hen a represented defendant files a pro se rule
3.170(l) motion based on allegations giving rise
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2024 | Docket: 68981094
Published
of a plea
after sentencing pursuant to rule 3.170(l). Lastly, Defendant appears to
seek additional
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2024 | Docket: 68869813
Published
judgment of conviction and sentence. See Fla. R. Crim. P.
3.170(f) (“The court may in its discretion, and
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2024 | Docket: 68838092
Published
before the trial
court ruled on the construed Rule 3.170(l) motion—Mathis filed his
“Motion to Supplement
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2024 | Docket: 68422842
Published
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.160 (“Arraignment”); Fla. R. Crim. P.
3.170(a) (identifying three types of pleas regarding
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2024 | Docket: 68270031
Published
agreement. The State, though, never filed a rule 3.170(g) motion in the lower
proceedings. Regardless
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2024 | Docket: 65635478
Published
se motion to
withdraw a plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l), which contains
specific allegations
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2023 | Docket: 68091952
Published
to
withdraw plea after sentencing pursuant to rule 3.170(l). The court
summarily denied the motion without
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2023 | Docket: 68043003
Published
was not entitled to
withdraw his plea pursuant rule 3.170(f).
Appellant pled guilty to seven counts:
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2023 | Docket: 63588200
Published
conflict-free counsel
to assist him in preparing his rule 3.170(l) motion. We agree.
“A motion to withdraw
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2022 | Docket: 65346487
Published
Armstrong’s motion is
not such a motion. Consider where rule 3.170 appears in the
criminal rules in relation to
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 2022 | Docket: 63591315
Published
been made in writing under the provisions of rule
3.170(a);
(3) at any pretrial conference
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2022 | Docket: 63572504
Published
his or her plea
prior to sentencing. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f) (“The court may in its
discretion, and
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2022 | Docket: 63385751
Published
one seeking to withdraw the plea
pursuant to rule 3.170(l), which provides:
A defendant who pleads
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2022 | Docket: 63352048
Published
a
represented defendant files a pro se rule 3.170(l) motion based
on allegations giving rise
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 2022 | Docket: 62218239
Published
trial court denied Appellant’s post-
sentencing rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw his plea of guilty to four
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 2021 | Docket: 61574102
Published
Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Fla. R.
Crim. P. 3.170(l) (“A defendant who pleads guilty or nolo
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2021 | Docket: 60695057
Published
withdraw his plea as involuntary, pursuant to rule
3.170(l). This motion was denied, and the trial court’s
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2021 | Docket: 60414524
Published
plea
before sentencing” (emphasis in original)). Rule 3.170 provides as
follows:
The court may in its
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2021 | Docket: 60108403
Published
untimely. A motion to
withdraw plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l) is narrowly limited in both time and
scope:
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2021 | Docket: 59921668
Published
” Id. We said that we were adopting the
new rule 3.170(l) “[c]onsistent with the legislature’s philosophy
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2021 | Docket: 59241560
Published
motion as successive
following denial of a prior rule 3.170(l) motion).
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2021 | Docket: 59241560
Published
motion as successive
following denial of a prior rule 3.170(l) motion).
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 2020 | Docket: 18707239
Published
made in writing under the provisions of rule 3.170(a);
(3) at any pretrial conference, unless
Category: Criminal Procedure
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 13, 2020 | Docket: 18630131
Published
would not have been
1
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l) provides that “[a] defendant who pleads
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2020 | Docket: 18458088
Published
trial court. We disagree and
affirm. 2
A rule 3.170(l) motion must be filed “within thirty days after
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2019 | Docket: 16543996
Published
sentence, on February 26, 2018, Chipman filed a rule 3.170(l) motion alleging that his
plea was involuntarily
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2019 | Docket: 16223265
Published
present proper bases to challenge the plea under rule 3.170(l). See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c)
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2019 | Docket: 16095932
Published
someone that he had deleted the
2 See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l); Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)a
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 2019 | Docket: 16055472
Published
578 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).
While Robinson’s Rule 3.170(l) motion was pending in the circuit court,
this
Category: Criminal Procedure
273 So. 3d 54
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2019 | Docket: 15731301
Published
recognizes “the thirty-day window
provided in rule 3.170(l) is a critical stage of the criminal proceedings”
Category: Criminal Procedure
270 So. 3d 1287
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2019 | Docket: 15651838
Published
preserved by a motion to withdraw plea. See
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)c
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2019 | Docket: 14988959
Published
to withdraw plea after sentencing. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l). We
reverse and remand with directions
Category: Criminal Procedure
264 So. 3d 1101
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2019 | Docket: 14554435
Published
Sheppard, 17 So. 3d 275. We agree.
Rule 3.170(l) provides: "A defendant who pleads guilty
Category: Criminal Procedure
269 So. 3d 580
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2019 | Docket: 14533667
Published
419,
421 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l); Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c)
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2019 | Docket: 8480912
Published
a timely-filed motion
to withdraw plea under rule 3.170(l) is pending and a notice of
appeal is filed
Category: Criminal Procedure
257 So. 3d 1234
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2018 | Docket: 64691450
Published
4th DCA 2000) (affirming denial of untimely rule 3.170(l ) motion without prejudice to the appellant's
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2018 | Docket: 8343187
Published
4th
DCA 2000) (affirming denial of untimely rule 3.170(l) motion
without prejudice to the appellant’s
Category: Criminal Procedure
249 So. 3d 1284
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2018 | Docket: 7254062
Published
A motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l) is a
critical stage in the direct criminal
Category: Criminal Procedure
254 So. 3d 428
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2018 | Docket: 7225323
Published
the court
erred in failing to treat it as a Rule 3.170(l) motion. See Applegate v. State, 23
So. 3d
Category: Criminal Procedure
243 So. 3d 530
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2018 | Docket: 64678650
Published
(agreeing that a trial court may strike pro se rule 3.170(l ) motion as a nullity unless the motion "contains
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2018 | Docket: 6915075
Published
(agreeing that a trial court may strike pro se rule 3.170(l)
motion as a nullity unless the motion “contains
Category: Criminal Procedure
230 So. 3d 953
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2017 | Docket: 6232645
Published
to withdraw a plea before sentencing under [rule] 3.170(f), the trial court must either deny the motion
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2017 | Docket: 6219530
Published
prior to the imposition of sentence, see Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(a);
Hardwick v. State, 630 So. 2d 1212
Category: Criminal Procedure
229 So. 3d 1256
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2017 | Docket: 6219401
Published
Thus, pleas have been found involuntary under rule 3.170(l) when the trial judge indicates that a harsher
Category: Criminal Procedure
225 So. 3d 345, 2017 WL 3318004, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11281
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2017 | Docket: 6136507
Published
evidentiary hearing where she stated colorable claim in rule 3.170(£) motion that her plea was not voluntarily,
Category: Criminal Procedure
213 So. 3d 1114, 2017 WL 1102943, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3900
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2017 | Docket: 4667186
Published
Appellant argues and the State concedes that a rule 3.170 motion to withdraw plea is a critical stage of
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2017 | Docket: 4620356
Published
So. 2d 645, 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (“Although rule 3.170(l) does not
expressly require a trial court
Category: Criminal Procedure
213 So. 3d 917, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 495
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2017 | Docket: 60263945
Published
court observed that prior to the creation of rule 3.170(g), “[t]he State’s ability to have a breached
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2016 | Docket: 4469190
Published
State, 943
So. 2d 899 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170 (a); Fla. R. Juv. P.
8.075(a). It would
Category: Criminal Procedure
202 So. 3d 901, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14505
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2016 | Docket: 4426701
Published
first felony conviction.
See
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(a);
see also Hardwick v. State,
Category: Criminal Procedure
210 So. 3d 106, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13526
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 2016 | Docket: 4422984
Published
withdraw plea after sentencing.
See
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(Z). Because the motion was facially sufficient
Category: Criminal Procedure
210 So. 3d 98, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13367
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2016 | Docket: 4422988
Published
to consider the amended motion untimely.
Rule 3.170(í) provides as follows:
A defendant who
Category: Criminal Procedure
210 So. 3d 87, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12897
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2016 | Docket: 4416606
Published
that “the law favors a trial on the merits,” and rule 3.170(f) should thus be “liberally construed” in favor
Category: Criminal Procedure
192 So. 3d 579, 2016 WL 2906730, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7645
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 2016 | Docket: 3071423
Published
motion to mitigate his sentence rather than a rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw his plea. Appellant alleged
Category: Criminal Procedure
190 So. 3d 268, 2016 WL 2760113, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7304
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 2016 | Docket: 3065878
Published
his probation. On July 31, 2015, Kogan filed a rule 3.170(J) motion to withdraw his plea, alleging that
Category: Criminal Procedure
190 So. 3d 1122, 2016 WL 1718847, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6530
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 2016 | Docket: 60254750
Published
subsequently moved to withdraw the plea, pursuant to rule 3.170(Z), in order to file a motion to dismiss and
Category: Criminal Procedure
198 So. 3d 780, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3374, 2016 WL 833507
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2016 | Docket: 3041728
Published
THE TRIAL COURT TO RESOLVE MOTIONS UNDER FLA. R. CRIM. P. 3.170(0
ALTENBERND, Judge.
Weston Gray
Category: Criminal Procedure
186 So. 3d 37, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2170, 2016 WL 618886
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2016 | Docket: 3036702
Published
of his rendered sentence.
See
Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(Z). The trial court will also need to address
Category: Criminal Procedure
176 So. 3d 364
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2015 | Docket: 2991550
Published
to avail himself of the procedure provided by rule 3.170(Z) and filed a pro se motion to withdraw his
Category: Criminal Procedure
174 So. 3d 1079, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13538, 2015 WL 5279034
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 2015 | Docket: 60250265
Published
defendant files a motion to withdraw plea under rule 3.170(0, but the time to file such a motion has passed
Category: Criminal Procedure
201 So. 3d 77, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13062
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 2015 | Docket: 2690037
Published
well within the thirty day window prescribed by rule 3.170(i). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal and remand
Category: Criminal Procedure
174 So. 3d 1055, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13080, 2015 WL 5131633
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 2015 | Docket: 2690047
Published
(Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (affirming denial of pro se rule 3.170(£) motion; motion was a nullity since it was
Category: Criminal Procedure
166 So. 3d 894, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8479, 2015 WL 3486645
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 2015 | Docket: 2679287
Published
the trial court erred by summarily denying his Rule 3.170(Z) motion without appointing conflict-free counsel
Category: Criminal Procedure
163 So. 3d 745
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2015 | Docket: 2654151
Published
the guilty plea on erroneous legal advice.
Rule 3.170(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
189 So. 3d 804, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3475, 2015 WL 1046268
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 2015 | Docket: 2640571
Published
dismiss the motion as premature and to rule on the rule 3.170(Z) motion to withdraw plea.
Wilson v. State
Category: Criminal Procedure
154 So. 3d 1203, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 399, 2015 WL 160724
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 2015 | Docket: 2624300
Published
was styled as a motion to withdraw plea under rule 3.170(Z), and while the postconviction court correctly
Category: Criminal Procedure
152 So. 3d 93, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19076, 2014 WL 6489203
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2014 | Docket: 60245140
Published
the defendant in a trial of that cause.
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f). Shores is correct that the rule does
Category: Criminal Procedure
150 So. 3d 1209, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18560, 2014 WL 5901860
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2014 | Docket: 2597994
Published
State,
17 So.3d 275 (Fla. 2009) (applying rule 3.170(0 to a motion to withdraw the defendant’s admission
Category: Criminal Procedure
149 So. 3d 1192
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2014 | Docket: 2592195
Published
file a motion to withdraw the plea. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(Z). Florida law recognizes that a 3.170(Z)
Category: Criminal Procedure
161 So. 3d 561, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17287, 2014 WL 5853778
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2014 | Docket: 60247205
Published
PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(1).
. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(a)(5);
Category: Criminal Procedure
149 So. 3d 1163
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2014 | Docket: 1421760
Published
was legally dispositive as contemplated under rule 3.170(£), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and rule
Category: Criminal Procedure
143 So. 3d 1160, 2014 WL 3928491, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12424
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2014 | Docket: 936950
Published
life sentence if convicted is cognizable under rule 3.170(i).”).
Second, we conclude that the defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
144 So. 3d 656, 2014 WL 3882930, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12211
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2014 | Docket: 836854
Published
1
.
See, e.g.,
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f), (/).
Category: Criminal Procedure
147 So. 3d 1029, 2014 WL 3843984, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11986
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2014 | Docket: 839414
Published
in that case. Hence, the legal requirements of rule 3.170(k) were clearly not fulfilled, and the trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
137 So. 3d 568, 2014 WL 1652533, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6085
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2014 | Docket: 60240373
Published
erroneously treated the motion as filed under rule 3.170(1) and denied the motion as untimely because
Category: Criminal Procedure
155 So. 3d 1153, 2014 WL 1612667, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5738
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2014 | Docket: 60245575
Published
conflict-free counsel to represent the appellant on his rule 3.170(1) motion. See Sheppard v. State, 17 So.3d 275
Category: Criminal Procedure
137 So. 3d 442, 2014 WL 940726, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3454
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2014 | Docket: 60240311
Published
was not preserved for direct appeal.1 See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(0.
In Clemons v. State, 111 So.2d 1169
Category: Criminal Procedure
133 So. 3d 644, 2014 WL 982557, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3499
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2014 | Docket: 60238863
Published
finding that the motions were untimely filed under rule 3.170(l) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 2014 | Docket: 401593
Published
the postconviction rules and the
deletion of rule 3.170(l). As explained in the joint petition, the proposed
Category: Criminal Procedure
128 So. 3d 964, 2013 WL 6977960, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20510
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2013 | Docket: 60237244
Published
noncompliance with the plea agreement. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(g)(2)(A) (providing that the State may move
Category: Criminal Procedure
128 So. 3d 127, 2013 WL 5729822, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16768
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2013 | Docket: 60236978
Published
agreement before the plea was accepted. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(g)(1) (“Whenever a plea agreement requires
Category: Criminal Procedure
128 So. 3d 115, 2013 WL 5493434, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15625
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2013 | Docket: 60236955
Published
days after rendition of the sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(0- As explained in Gafford v. State, 783
Category: Criminal Procedure
136 So. 3d 609, 2013 WL 5225383, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14809
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 2013 | Docket: 60240037
Published
“Because the law favors a trial on the merits, [rule 3.170(f) ] should be liberally construed in favor of
Category: Criminal Procedure
125 So. 3d 294, 2013 WL 4821202, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14456
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 2013 | Docket: 60235824
Published
life sentence.
Tennis previously moved under rule 3.170(Z) to withdraw his agreement as involuntary.
Category: Criminal Procedure
116 So. 3d 614, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10297, 2013 WL 3238232
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 2013 | Docket: 60232413
Published
after the rendition of his sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170.
As explained in Gafford v. State, 783 So
Category: Criminal Procedure
115 So. 3d 1081, 2013 WL 3099940, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9803
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2013 | Docket: 60232084
Published
fully adjudicated in its order denying Baker’s rule 3.170 motion. The court concluded that Baker’s proper
Category: Criminal Procedure
115 So. 3d 1079, 2013 WL 3014132, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9619
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 2013 | Docket: 60232082
Published
sentencing and remand for further proceedings. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(0-
Appellant contends that his lawyer failed
Category: Criminal Procedure
114 So. 3d 1110, 2013 WL 2661734, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9426
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2013 | Docket: 60231758
Published
DISCUSSION
Mr. O’Berry filed his motion under rule 3.170(i), which provides, “A defendant who pleads guilty
Category: Criminal Procedure
115 So. 3d 1045, 2013 WL 2420394, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8886
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2013 | Docket: 60232060
Published
post-sentencing in this case was untimely filed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l) (motion must be filed within thirty days
Category: Criminal Procedure
112 So. 3d 1234, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 247, 2013 WL 1666737, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 710
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2013 | Docket: 60230994
Published
the postconviction rules and the deletion of rule 3.170(1). As explained in the joint petition, the proposed
Category: Criminal Procedure
106 So. 3d 56, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1543, 2013 WL 380068
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2013 | Docket: 60228404
Published
proceedings.
A motion to withdraw plea under rule 3.170(0 must be filed within thirty days after rendition
Category: Criminal Procedure
104 So. 3d 304, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 678, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2667, 2012 WL 5439265
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2012 | Docket: 60227454
Published
addition, the Committee proposes deletion of rule 3.170(l) (Pleas — Motion to Withdraw the Plea after
Category: Criminal Procedure
100 So. 3d 173, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18276, 2012 WL 5076103
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2012 | Docket: 60225662
Published
appeal as premature.
At the time Balzer filed his rule 3.170(() motion, he was still represented by his trial
Category: Criminal Procedure
96 So. 3d 1114, 2012 WL 3870848, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14981
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2012 | Docket: 60311439
Published
“Because the law favors a trial on the merits, [rule 3.170(f) ] should be liberally construed in favor of
Category: Criminal Procedure
96 So. 3d 1031, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14015, 2012 WL 3586590
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2012 | Docket: 60311379
Published
in prison.
He moved to withdraw his plea under rule 3.170(i), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, raising
Category: Criminal Procedure
88 So. 3d 413, 2012 WL 1697058, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7834
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2012 | Docket: 60308283
Published
motion was premature because it was filed while a Rule 3.170(1) motion to vacate plea was pending and before
Category: Criminal Procedure
75 So. 3d 757, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17207, 2011 WL 5105638
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2011 | Docket: 60303927
Published
the operation of pleas, and noted that while rule 3.170 contains a time limitation and 3.172 does not
Category: Criminal Procedure
64 So. 3d 744, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10163, 2011 WL 2556912
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2011 | Docket: 2362390
Published
follow when an indigent defendant files a pro se rule 3.170(l) motion alleging an adversarial *746 relationship
Category: Criminal Procedure
60 So. 3d 422, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2958, 2011 WL 714244
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2011 | Docket: 60300207
Published
So.2d 679 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (oral denial of rule 3.170(f) motion reviewable in the appeal from judgment
Category: Criminal Procedure
125 So. 3d 165, 2011 WL 182128, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 225
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2011 | Docket: 60235757
Published
6 So.3d 653, 655 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (“Under rule 3.170(f), the trial court may, in its discretion, and
Category: Criminal Procedure
50 So. 3d 1208, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19827, 2010 WL 5345841
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 2010 | Docket: 60297266
Published
rendered on a motion to withdraw a plea filed under rule 3.170(0 does not waive or abandon the motion. [See]
Category: Criminal Procedure
43 So. 3d 154, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12732, 2010 WL 3419813
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2010 | Docket: 60295421
Published
rather than the “substantial noncompliance.” Rule 3.170(g)(2)(C) mandates that “[n]o plea or sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
36 So. 3d 918, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8196, 2010 WL 2292226
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2010 | Docket: 2581805
Published
motion for rehearing as to the denial of his rule 3.170(l) motion to vacate plea, and denying it. The
Category: Criminal Procedure
34 So. 3d 788, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6937, 2010 WL 1979255
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2010 | Docket: 2557264
Published
agreement before the plea was accepted. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(g)(1) ("Whenever a plea agreement requires
Category: Criminal Procedure
35 So. 3d 108, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6751, 2010 WL 1930138
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 2010 | Docket: 1770147
Published
hearing on a pro se motion filed pursuant to rule 3.170(l) when the motion *109 gives rise to the suggestion
Category: Criminal Procedure
33 So. 3d 753, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5230, 2010 WL 1542635
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2010 | Docket: 1153759
Published
Procedure 3.170(f). When considering a motion under rule 3.170(f), the trial court is required to allow the
Category: Criminal Procedure
30 So. 3d 596, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2536, 2010 WL 711708
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 2010 | Docket: 122866
Published
withdraw his plea was untimely filed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f) and (l). We therefore deny Rondon's motion
Category: Criminal Procedure
14 So. 3d 1269, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9355, 2009 WL 1940758
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 2009 | Docket: 1650659
Published
Sayles filedthrough his defense counsela timely rule 3.170(l) motion, alleging that he was
advised [by counsel]
Category: Criminal Procedure
10 So. 3d 184, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2898, 2009 WL 928758
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2009 | Docket: 761094
Published
939 So.2d 1196, 1196 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ("A rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea filed by a criminal
Category: Criminal Procedure
10 So. 3d 149, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2514, 2009 WL 763484
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 2009 | Docket: 1132811
Published
alleged error in this case, either by motion under Rule 3.170(l) or by objection, foreclose her from raising
Category: Criminal Procedure
994 So. 2d 1254, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 18018, 2008 WL 4999265
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 2008 | Docket: 64856863
Published
indicates his desire to avail himself of the rule 3.170(i) procedure, the trial court must appoint conflict-free
Category: Criminal Procedure
994 So. 2d 491, 2008 WL 4862519
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2008 | Docket: 389796
Published
did not appeal. Camon later filed an "amended" rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw his pleas, a motion to
Category: Criminal Procedure
976 So. 2d 1159, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 3647, 2008 WL 678654
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2008 | Docket: 64854176
Published
a better plea deal with the prosecutor.
Under rule 3.170(f), the trial court may, in its discretion, and
Category: Criminal Procedure
975 So. 2d 1192, 2008 WL 595937
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2008 | Docket: 1119693
Published
motion to withdraw plea as successive to the rule 3.170(l) motion. The judgments and sentences and denial
Category: Criminal Procedure
975 So. 2d 1192, 2008 WL 595937
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2008 | Docket: 1119693
Published
motion to withdraw plea as successive to the rule 3.170(l) motion. The judgments and sentences and denial
Category: Criminal Procedure
969 So. 2d 1144, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18171, 2007 WL 3390929
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2007 | Docket: 64853315
Published
Procedure 3.170(l) and denied the motion as untimely. Rule 3.170(l) permits a defendant who pleaded guilty or
Category: Criminal Procedure
969 So. 2d 1142, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18124, 2007 WL 3355383
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2007 | Docket: 64853311
Published
CURIAM.
Williams appeals an order denying his rule 3.170(£) motion to withdraw his plea which he alleged
Category: Criminal Procedure
959 So. 2d 250, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 389, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 1103, 2007 WL 1774440
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2007 | Docket: 64851248
Published
on what conditions, to grant pretrial release.
Rule 3.170 (Pleas) is amended to permit a defendant who
Category: Criminal Procedure
953 So. 2d 513, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 116, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 558, 2007 WL 924070
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2007 | Docket: 64850055
Published
Court in Amendments II added subdivision (2) to rule 3.170(k), Responsibility of Court on Pleas, to provide
Category: Criminal Procedure
948 So. 2d 919, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1801, 2007 WL 465592
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2007 | Docket: 64849142
Published
State, 688 So.2d 1016 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(g).
We also reverse the sentence for direct
Category: Criminal Procedure
941 So. 2d 1242, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19283, 2006 WL 3327855
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 2006 | Docket: 64847824
Published
expressly required under Florida law. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(h), 3.172. The plea in this case was taken
Category: Criminal Procedure
938 So. 2d 978, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2208, 2006 WL 2690141
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2006 | Docket: 64847113
Published
court.
PARIENTE and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
APPENDIX
RULE 3.170. PLEAS
(a) Types of Plea; Court’s Discretion
Category: Criminal Procedure
937 So. 2d 1150, 2006 WL 2483080
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2006 | Docket: 1513104
Published
2002).
A motion to withdraw plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l) is a critical stage of the proceedings at
Category: Criminal Procedure
935 So. 2d 1288, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14257, 2006 WL 2448560
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2006 | Docket: 64846194
Published
Williams, pro se, appeals the order denying his rule 3.170(Z) motion to withdraw the plea he entered in
Category: Criminal Procedure
920 So. 2d 776, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1835, 2006 WL 335653
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2006 | Docket: 64842368
Published
we deny his petition for belated appeal. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(i); Fla. RApp. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A). We do
Category: Criminal Procedure
915 So. 2d 779, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19716, 2005 WL 3408028
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2005 | Docket: 64841091
Published
withdraw plea, which was a motion filed pursuant to rule 3.170(l). The State conceded the error, and we reversed
Category: Criminal Procedure
903 So. 2d 333, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8877, 2005 WL 1364380
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2005 | Docket: 64838802
Published
has not been formally accepted by the court.1 Rule 3.170(f) provides the court with discretion to deny
Category: Criminal Procedure
895 So. 2d 440, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 262, 2005 WL 280344
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2005 | Docket: 64836427
Published
this motion is deemed to be filed pursuant to rule 3.170(0, it was improper because it was not filed by
Category: Criminal Procedure
912 So. 2d 585, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18328, 2004 WL 3033258
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 2004 | Docket: 64840626
Published
to withdraw plea after sentencing pursuant to rule 3.170(i), arguing that the trial court’s sentence was
Category: Criminal Procedure
885 So. 2d 449, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15675, 2004 WL 2375612
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2004 | Docket: 64833720
Published
1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969)); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(k) (“No plea of guilty or nolo contendere
Category: Criminal Procedure
879 So. 2d 645, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8878, 2004 WL 1401388
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 2004 | Docket: 64832132
Published
his motion to withdraw plea filed pursuant to Rule 3.170(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The
Category: Criminal Procedure
875 So. 2d 765, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8549, 2004 WL 1359001
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2004 | Docket: 64831129
Published
postsentence “manifest injustice” standard of rule 3.170(i). See Iaconetti v. State, 869 So.2d 695, 699
Category: Criminal Procedure
871 So. 2d 1044, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6437, 2004 WL 1057793
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2004 | Docket: 64830138
Published
did not file a motion to withdraw pursuant to rule 3.170(1)).
PETITION FOR BELATED APPEAL DENIED.
PLEUS
Category: Criminal Procedure
867 So. 2d 647, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3507, 2004 WL 534039
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2004 | Docket: 64828694
Published
days after rendition of the sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l). As explained in Gafford v. State, 783
Category: Criminal Procedure
869 So. 2d 26, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2372, 2004 WL 359978
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 2004 | Docket: 64829102
Published
affirmed the order denying *27Foeley’s earlier rule 3.170(i) motion without prejudice to his filing a facially
Category: Criminal Procedure
868 So. 2d 585, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2287, 2004 WL 351779
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 2004 | Docket: 64828973
Published
to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170.
Rule 3.170(i) allows a defendant to challenge the entry
Category: Criminal Procedure
857 So. 2d 271, 2003 WL 22103445
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2003 | Docket: 64825869
Published
mentioned in the rule.
Despite the language in rule 3.170(f), we conclude that Mr. Pope was authorized
Category: Criminal Procedure
851 So. 2d 847, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11787, 2003 WL 21820744
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2003 | Docket: 64824281
Published
taking a plea, ascertain its factual basis. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(k).
Accordingly, we vacate the appealed
Category: Criminal Procedure
850 So. 2d 605, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10221, 2003 WL 21537408
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2003 | Docket: 64824108
Published
that the motion is facially insufficient. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(1); 9.140(b)(2)(A); Harris v. State, 818
Category: Criminal Procedure
846 So. 2d 1262, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8787, 2003 WL 21347178
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 2003 | Docket: 64823304
Published
should have been allowed to withdraw his plea. Rule 3.170(f) provides:
“Withdrawal of Plea of Guilty. The
Category: Criminal Procedure
849 So. 2d 340, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 5408, 2003 WL 1876892
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2003 | Docket: 64823932
Published
not a part of Spain’s plea agreement. Moreover, rule 3.170(g) contemplates that the defendant’s plea, as
Category: Criminal Procedure
840 So. 2d 440, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3792, 2003 WL 1386704
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2003 | Docket: 64821357
Published
269 (Fla.1999). Pleas are governed generally by Rule 3.170, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Subsection
Category: Criminal Procedure
837 So. 2d 1125, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1835, 2003 WL 355248
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2003 | Docket: 64820876
Published
filed a motion to withdraw his plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(i). The motion contained a factually-based
Category: Criminal Procedure
837 So. 2d 924, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1011, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 2580, 2002 WL 31718857
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2002 | Docket: 64820841
Published
has been found guilty or pled nolo contendere.
Rule 3.170, Pleas, is amended to change the reference to
Category: Criminal Procedure
827 So. 2d 321, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13218, 2002 WL 31039407
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2002 | Docket: 64817881
Published
filed within 30 days after sentencing. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(Z) (effective January 1, 1997).
Category: Criminal Procedure
814 So. 2d 1165, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4963, 2002 WL 561686
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2002 | Docket: 64814671
Published
appellant never moved to withdraw his plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f) (stating a court may permit withdrawal
Category: Criminal Procedure
804 So. 2d 445, 2001 WL 1327152
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2001 | Docket: 1334095
Published
appeals. We affirm.
To show good cause under Rule 3.170(f) or grounds for relief under Rule 3.850, Mr
Category: Criminal Procedure
784 So. 2d 1267, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7442, 2001 WL 567629
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 2001 | Docket: 64805352
Published
untimely filed and is procedurally deficient. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(1) & 3.850(b).
AFFIRMED.
DAVIS, PADOVANO
Category: Criminal Procedure
782 So. 2d 993, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5154, 2001 WL 388015
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2001 | Docket: 64804883
Published
accepted by the court where the state consents. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(h). State v. Warner, 721 So.2d 767 (Fla.
Category: Criminal Procedure
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 4, 2001 | Docket: 212636
Published
appeal, Hardy
filed a motion pursuant to Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f) to withdraw his plea. Upon
Hardy’s
Category: Criminal Procedure
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 4, 2001 | Docket: 212637
Published
appeal, Hardy filed a motion pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f) to
withdraw his plea. Upon Hardy's
Category: Criminal Procedure
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 4, 2001 | Docket: 212637
Published
appeal, Hardy filed a motion pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f) to
withdraw his plea. Upon Hardy's
Category: Criminal Procedure
773 So. 2d 1292, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 61, 2001 WL 9838
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2001 | Docket: 64802625
Published
order to contest the involuntariness of his plea, Rule 3.170, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and Rule
Category: Criminal Procedure
772 So. 2d 610, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16140, 2000 WL 1807404
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2000 | Docket: 64802090
Published
motion to withdraw his plea is reversed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(0; Fla. R.App. P. 2.090(h). We remand for
Category: Criminal Procedure
755 So. 2d 833, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5200, 2000 WL 553959
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 2000 | Docket: 64796803
Published
1998); see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(Z). Unfortunately for the appellant, he
Category: Criminal Procedure
744 So. 2d 564, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14801, 1999 WL 1004623
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1999 | Docket: 64792087
Published
defendant’s withdrawal of a guilty plea is governed by rule 3.170(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. As this
Category: Criminal Procedure
739 So. 2d 729, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12108, 1999 WL 729090
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1999 | Docket: 64790326
Published
file a motion to withdraw his plea. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.170(f). As a result, his claim of sentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
755 So. 2d 674, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8694, 1999 WL 436799
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1999 | Docket: 64796724
Published
cited to the identically worded predecessor of Rule 3.170(h), and held that where the state attorney “expressly
Category: Criminal Procedure
728 So. 2d 1214, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3448, 1999 WL 155966
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1999 | Docket: 64787048
Published
30 days of the rendition of the sentence, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(1), it being recalled that the original sentence
Category: Criminal Procedure
731 So. 2d 57, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3410, 1999 WL 156065
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1999 | Docket: 64787801
Published
basis only upon entry of the plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(k). Furthermore, as the court pointed out
Category: Criminal Procedure
728 So. 2d 338, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2518, 1999 WL 123647
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1999 | Docket: 64786814
Published
denying a motion to withdraw plea pursuant to rule 3.170(i), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The
Category: Criminal Procedure
732 So. 2d 1122, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1766, 1999 WL 89299
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1999 | Docket: 64788291
Published
of guilty to be withdrawn ...” Fla. R.Crim.P. Rule 3.170(f).
The burden is upon a defendant to establish
Category: Criminal Procedure
715 So. 2d 1177, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11001, 1998 WL 542812
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1998 | Docket: 64782211
Published
1998); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(iii); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(l)
COBB, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur
Category: Criminal Procedure
696 So. 2d 1194, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5385, 1997 WL 253038
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1997 | Docket: 64775019
Published
The discretion vested in trial courts under rule 3.170(f) to allow a criminal defendant to withdraw
Category: Criminal Procedure
666 So. 2d 998, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 257, 1996 WL 16560
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 1996 | Docket: 64761717
Published
Criminal Procedure 3.170(f), in part, provides
RULE 3.170 PLEAS
* * * * * *
(f) Withdrawal of Plea of Guilty
Category: Criminal Procedure
657 So. 2d 1225, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7095, 1995 WL 385665
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1995 | Docket: 64757849
Published
intelligent. Sirmons, 620 So.2d at 1249; Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.170(j). Therefore, appellant’s subsequent motions
Category: Criminal Procedure
654 So. 2d 286, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4659, 1995 WL 253966
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1995 | Docket: 64755903
Published
procedures by which to withdraw guilty plea are Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.170(f), which “must be invoked prior to sentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
643 So. 2d 1198, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10115, 1994 WL 576111
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1994 | Docket: 64751516
Published
of not guilty is made under the provisions of rule 3.170(a)) and at the pronouncement of judgment and
Category: Criminal Procedure
633 So. 2d 1056, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 126, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 354, 1994 WL 70436
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1994 | Docket: 64747006
Published
Committee. The Committee’s proposed amendment to rule 3.170(g) is in accord with our decision in McCoy.
The
Category: Criminal Procedure
622 So. 2d 176, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8425, 1993 WL 309036
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1993 | Docket: 64698066
Published
nolo contendere plea. This is not true. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j); Koenig v. State, 597 So.2d 256 (Fla.1992)
Category: Criminal Procedure
611 So. 2d 1343, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 163, 1993 WL 5059
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1993 | Docket: 64693401
Published
section 810.02(3), a second degree felony. See Rule 3.170(g), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which
Category: Criminal Procedure
599 So. 2d 1380, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5811, 1992 WL 109633
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1992 | Docket: 64667873
Published
the panel decided not to reach on this appeal.
Rule 3.170(j), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
594 So. 2d 322, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1352, 1992 WL 25801
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1992 | Docket: 64665486
Published
indication that he did not understand the proceedings.
Rule 3.170(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides
Category: Criminal Procedure
581 So. 2d 206, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5092, 1991 WL 90968
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1991 | Docket: 64659470
Published
his counsel. Defense counsel argued that under rule 3.170(f), the court was required to allow withdrawal
Category: Criminal Procedure
578 So. 2d 61, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3648, 1991 WL 60855
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1991 | Docket: 64658087
Published
State, 513 So.2d 204 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.170(f).
HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and STONE
Category: Criminal Procedure
575 So. 2d 1377, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2193, 1991 WL 32994
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1991 | Docket: 64657068
Published
DCA 1981); § 924.06(3), Fla.Stat. (1989); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170.
Fields also argues that, when he pled no
Category: Criminal Procedure
574 So. 2d 324, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1314, 1991 WL 18257
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1991 | Docket: 64656370
Published
of Cox v. State, 412 So.2d 354 (Fla.1982) and Rule 3.170(g), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was
Category: Criminal Procedure
571 So. 2d 125, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9949, 1990 WL 212152
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1990 | Docket: 64654999
Published
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f).
ERVIN, WIGGINTON and MINER, JJ., concur.
Category: Criminal Procedure
566 So. 2d 522, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3163, 1990 WL 58282
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1990 | Docket: 64652876
Published
appropriate plea colloquy requirements. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.170©, 3.172(c), 3.850. The excerpt of the plea
Category: Criminal Procedure
550 So. 2d 174, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2475, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5898, 1989 WL 124604
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1989 | Docket: 64645513
Published
without affording him an eviden-tiary hearing. See Rule 3.170(f), Fla.R. Crim.P. The motion, made pro se1 prior
Category: Criminal Procedure
543 So. 2d 290, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1030, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2267, 1989 WL 39571
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1989 | Docket: 64642543
Published
withdraw his plea and proceed to trial. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f); Noon v. State, 480 So.2d 668 (Fla. 4th
Category: Criminal Procedure
520 So. 2d 609, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1035, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11889, 1987 WL 42966
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1987 | Docket: 64632874
Published
it were, to the county court charges. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(a). It is well settled that any material
Category: Criminal Procedure
514 So. 2d 417, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2478, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10746
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1987 | Docket: 64630456
Published
sufficient to meet the good cause requirement of rule 3.170, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, for withdrawing
Category: Criminal Procedure
492 So. 2d 690, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8621, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1471
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1986 | Docket: 64621004
Published
appellant stood mute. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 3.170(c) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Category: Criminal Procedure
486 So. 2d 63, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 835, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7181
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1986 | Docket: 64618424
Published
jurisdiction, jeopardy had not attached.
Although rule 3.170(g) refers specifically to a guilty plea to a
Category: Criminal Procedure
468 So. 2d 312, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 887, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13308
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1985 | Docket: 64611733
Published
not advising appellant of his rights under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170. We affirm.
In March 1980 various members
Category: Criminal Procedure
463 So. 2d 537, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 388, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12401
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1985 | Docket: 64609900
Published
motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f).
AFFIRMED.
HERSEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ
Category: Criminal Procedure
461 So. 2d 1373, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 149, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 11905
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1985 | Docket: 64609219
Published
elected to stand mute. Therefore, in accord with Rule 3.170(c), Fla.R.Crim.P., the trial court entered a
Category: Criminal Procedure
458 So. 2d 5, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16475
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1984 | Docket: 64607655
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f); Brown v. State, 428 So.2d 369 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983);
Category: Criminal Procedure
451 So. 2d 542, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13872
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 1984 | Docket: 64605401
Published
the order which pertains to count 1. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f); Frederick v. State, 419 So.2d 736 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
443 So. 2d 436, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11231
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1984 | Docket: 64602012
Published
Robinson, the failure of the trial court to follow rule 3.170(j) makes the plea itself invalid on constitutional
Category: Criminal Procedure
439 So. 2d 963, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22724
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1983 | Docket: 64600285
Published
offers to plead guilty are inadmissible under Rule 3.170(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and
Category: Criminal Procedure
429 So. 2d 77, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19442
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 1983 | Docket: 64596012
Published
enough to overcome the appellant’s evidence.
Rule 3.170(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provides:
Category: Criminal Procedure
389 So. 2d 10, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17810
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1980 | Docket: 64578402
Published
U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970); Rule 3.170(g), Fla.R.Crim.P.
Category: Criminal Procedure
379 So. 2d 1292, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16337
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1979 | Docket: 64574415
Published
the plea and its voluntariness.” (e. s.) Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.170(j). However, a subsequent change in the
Category: Criminal Procedure
377 So. 2d 37
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1979 | Docket: 64572919
Published
plead guilty and was sentenced, and (7) that Rule 3.170(j) Fla. Rules of Criminal Procedure adopted December
Category: Criminal Procedure
377 So. 2d 37
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1979 | Docket: 64572919
Published
plead guilty and was sentenced, and (7) that Rule 3.170(j) Fla. Rules of Criminal Procedure adopted December
Category: Criminal Procedure
376 So. 2d 236, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16156
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1979 | Docket: 64572512
Published
there is factual basis for the plea. Moreover, Rule 3.170(j) provides that no plea of guilty and nolo conten-dere
Category: Criminal Procedure
360 So. 2d 457, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15934
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1978 | Docket: 64565251
Published
for the acceptance of the plea, as outlined in Rule 3.170(j), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, appellant’s
Category: Criminal Procedure
351 So. 2d 384, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16994
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1977 | Docket: 64561069
Published
judge properly accepted the guilty plea. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j) and Williams v. State, 316 So.2d 267 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
349 So. 2d 177, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16504
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1977 | Docket: 64559851
Published
factual basis for the pleas as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170[j]) deprived him of his constitutional right
Category: Criminal Procedure
345 So. 2d 655, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 4095
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1977 | Docket: 64558421
Published
court.
(a)(7) Substantially the same as Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.170(f).
(b)(1) Based on Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.190(a)
Category: Criminal Procedure
340 So. 2d 546, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16081
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1976 | Docket: 64556315
Published
understands the consequences of such a plea. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S
Category: Criminal Procedure
339 So. 2d 1158, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15798
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1976 | Docket: 64556140
Published
to vacate and set aside the judgment. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f), 3.850.
AFFIRMED.
McNULTY, C. J., and
Category: Criminal Procedure
336 So. 2d 432
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 1976 | Docket: 64554753
Published
of nolo contendere may be withdrawn. Although Rule 3.170(f) refers only to a plea of guilty we are of
Category: Criminal Procedure
336 So. 2d 121, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15189
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1976 | Docket: 64554667
Published
eliciting a “factual basis” as dictated by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j).1
In support of this argument, appellant
Category: Criminal Procedure
327 So. 2d 876, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14753
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1976 | Docket: 64552700
Published
the voluntariness of his plea as required by Rule 3.170(j) RCrP.
The appellant’s point on appeal is well
Category: Criminal Procedure
407 F. Supp. 605, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16734
District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1976 | Docket: 66114157
Published
the record a factual basis for the plea. See Rule 3.170(j), Fla.Rules of Cr.Proc. At the time of sentencing
Category: Criminal Procedure
326 So. 2d 33, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14233
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1976 | Docket: 64552188
Published
plea in the light of the psychiatric report. Rule 3.-170(f) R.Cr.P. No such request is made on this appeal
Category: Criminal Procedure
317 So. 2d 864, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13855
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1975 | Docket: 64548804
Published
case is that the trial judge did not comply with Rule 3.170(j) RCrP; he did not determine that there was
Category: Criminal Procedure
315 So. 2d 482, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14257
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 1975 | Docket: 64547999
Published
and proceed to trial on the merits. We affirm.
Rule 3.170(f), F.Cr.P., provides:
“(f) Withdrawal of Plea
Category: Criminal Procedure
316 So. 2d 297
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1975 | Docket: 1456303
Published
opinion that the crucial issue here is whether Rule 3.170(j), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires
Category: Criminal Procedure
314 So. 2d 625, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13664
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1975 | Docket: 64547390
Published
urging that the procedural requirements imposed by Rule 3.170(j) RCrP and by Boykin v. Alabama, 1969, 395 U
Category: Criminal Procedure
314 So. 2d 201, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13708
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1975 | Docket: 64547211
Published
RECORD A FACTUAL BASIS FOR THAT PLEA CONTRARY TO RULE 3.170(j) FRCrP, THUS DENYING DEFENDANT DUE PROCESS
Category: Criminal Procedure
313 So. 2d 121, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14899
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1975 | Docket: 64546615
Published
based on the provisions of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.170.
*122Neither the philosophy in Estes v. State
Category: Criminal Procedure
312 So. 2d 522, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14995
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1975 | Docket: 64546284
Published
without ascertaining if there was a factual basis, Rule 3.170(j), Fla.R. Cr.P. We hold there was no reversible
Category: Criminal Procedure
311 So. 2d 786, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15120
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1975 | Docket: 64545975
Published
defendant alleged no prejudice for failure to follow Rule 3.170(j), FRCrP. Accordingly, we affirm upon the authority
Category: Criminal Procedure
315 So. 2d 20, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13610
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1975 | Docket: 64547629
Published
was a factual basis for the pleas contrary to Rule 3.170(j), F.R.Cr.P. Our previous ruling in Estes v
Category: Criminal Procedure
310 So. 2d 751, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14072
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1975 | Docket: 64545566
Published
at the time of plea in criminal proceeding (Rule 3.-170(j), F.R.Cr.Proc.) and for proceedings in the
Category: Criminal Procedure
308 So. 2d 580, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14545
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1975 | Docket: 64544645
Published
the significance of the pleas as required by Rule 3.170(j) *581RCrP. See Wooff v. State, Fla.App.2d 1974
Category: Criminal Procedure
308 So. 2d 173, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14509
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1975 | Docket: 64544499
Published
the mandatory language of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.170 (j). Lyles v. State, 299 So.2d 146 (Fla.App.
Category: Criminal Procedure
308 So. 2d 177, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14511
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1975 | Docket: 64544500
Published
the mandatory language of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.170(j). Lyles v. State, 299 So.2d 146 (Fla.App. 1st
Category: Criminal Procedure
307 So. 2d 922, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14685
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1975 | Docket: 64544382
Published
”
In support thereof the appellant refers to Rule 3.170(f) RCrP, providing that the court may in its
Category: Criminal Procedure
304 So. 2d 485, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7528
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1974 | Docket: 64543104
Published
underlying factual basis for the pleas as required by Rule 3.170(j), F.R.Cr. P. No assignments of error having
Category: Criminal Procedure
304 So. 2d 458, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7509
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 1974 | Docket: 64543092
Published
adequately complying with the requirements of Rule 3.170(j) CrPR. When the court accepted the guilty pleas
Category: Criminal Procedure
303 So. 2d 425, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8328
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1974 | Docket: 64542674
Published
adequately complying with the requirements of Rule 3.170(j) CrPR. We believe the record adequately reflects
Category: Criminal Procedure
303 So. 2d 49, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8239
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1974 | Docket: 64542470
Published
pleas and their voluntariness, as required by Rule 3.170(j) RCrP.
The record reflects that at the time
Category: Criminal Procedure
297 So. 2d 67
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1974 | Docket: 1510402
Published
meticulously conducted the hearing required by Criminal Rule 3.170(j) and was satisfied as are we that they
Category: Criminal Procedure
293 So. 2d 376, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7623
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 1974 | Docket: 64538527
Published
of the significance of the plea as required by Rule 3.170(j), RCr.P, 33 F.S.A. Accordingly, we respectfully
Category: Criminal Procedure
299 So. 2d 130, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8802
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 1974 | Docket: 64540711
Published
accepted by the court without compliance with Rule 3.-170(j) CrPR, 33 F.S.A.1 While the record shows absence
Category: Criminal Procedure
275 So. 2d 597, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7107
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1973 | Docket: 64531363
Published
knowingly and understandingly as provided in Rule 3.170(a), RCrP, 33 F.S.A.
We have carefully examined
Category: Criminal Procedure
275 So. 2d 301, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7061
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1973 | Docket: 64531215
Published
knowingly and understandingly as provided in Rule 3.-170(a), RCrP., 33 F.S.A.
We have carefully examined
Category: Criminal Procedure
273 So. 2d 784, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7319
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1973 | Docket: 64530668
Published
was entered voluntarily and understandingly.
Rule 3.170(a), RCrP, 33 F.S.A., reads as follows:
“. .
Category: Criminal Procedure
273 So. 2d 773
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1973 | Docket: 64530663
Published
demonstrate that defendant’s plea was voluntary. See Rule 3.170(a), F.R.Cr.P.2 See also Costello v. State, Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
264 So. 2d 121, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6529
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 1972 | Docket: 64526691
Published
First, no timely motion to withdraw was made. See Rule 3.170(f), CrPR, 33 F.S.A., and Stapleton v. State,
Category: Criminal Procedure