Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170 - PLEAS | Syfert Law

Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170

RULE 3.170. PLEAS

(a) Types of Plea; Court’s Discretion. A defendant may
plead not guilty, guilty, or, with the consent of the court, nolo
contendere. Except as otherwise provided by these rules, all pleas to
a charge shall be in open court and shall be entered by the
defendant. If the sworn complaint charges the commission of a
misdemeanor, the defendant may plead guilty to the charge at the
first appearance under rule 3.130, and the judge may thereupon
enter judgment and sentence without the necessity of any further
formal charges being filed. A plea of not guilty may be entered in
writing by counsel. Every plea shall be entered of record, but a
failure to enter it shall not affect the validity of any proceeding in
the cause.

(b) Pleading to Other Charges. Having entered a plea in
accordance with this rule, the defendant may, with the court’s
permission, enter a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to any and all
charges pending against him or her in the State of Florida over
which the court would have jurisdiction and, when authorized by
law, to charges pending in a court of lesser jurisdiction, if the
prosecutor in the other case or cases gives written consent thereto.
The court accepting such a plea shall make a disposition of all such
charges by judgment, sentence, or otherwise. The record of the plea
and its disposition shall be filed in the court of original jurisdiction
of the offense. If a defendant secures permission to plead to other
pending charges and does so plead, the entry of such a plea shall
constitute a waiver by the defendant of venue and all
nonjurisdictional defects relating to such charges.

(c) Standing Mute or Pleading Evasively. If a defendant
stands mute, or pleads evasively, a plea of not guilty shall be
entered.

(d) Failure of Corporation to Appear. If the defendant is a
corporation and fails to appear, a plea of not guilty shall be entered
of record.

(e) Plea of Not Guilty; Operation in Denial. A plea of not
guilty is a denial of every material allegation in the indictment or
information on which the defendant is to be tried.

(f) Withdrawal of Plea of Guilty or No Contest. The court
may in its discretion, and shall on good cause, at any time before a
sentence, permit a plea of guilty or no contest to be withdrawn and,
if judgment of conviction has been entered thereon, set aside the
judgment and allow a plea of not guilty, or, with the consent of the
prosecuting attorney, allow a plea of guilty or no contest of a lesser
included offense, or of a lesser degree of the offense charged, to be
substituted for the plea of guilty or no contest. The fact that a
defendant may have entered a plea of guilty or no contest and later
withdrawn the plea may not be used against the defendant in a trial
of that cause.

(g) Vacation of Plea and Sentence Due to Defendant’s
Noncompliance.

(1) Whenever a plea agreement requires the defendant
to comply with some specific terms, those terms shall be expressly
made a part of the plea entered into in open court.

(2) Unless otherwise stated at the time the plea is
entered:
(A) The state may move to vacate a plea and
sentence within 60 days of the defendant’s noncompliance with the
specific terms of a plea agreement.

(B) When a motion is filed pursuant to subdivision
(g)(2)(A) of this rule, the court shall hold an evidentiary hearing on
the issue unless the defendant admits noncompliance with the
specific terms of the plea agreement.

(C) No plea or sentence shall be vacated unless
the court finds that there has been substantial noncompliance with
the express plea agreement.

(D) When a plea and sentence is vacated pursuant
to this rule, the cause shall be set for trial within 90 days of the
order vacating the plea and sentence.

(h) Plea of Guilty to Lesser Included Offense or Lesser
Degree. The defendant, with the consent of the court and of the
prosecuting attorney, may plead guilty to any lesser offense than
that charged that is included in the offense charged in the
indictment or information or to any lesser degree of the offense
charged.

(i) Plea of Guilty to an Offense Divided into Degrees;
Determination of the Degree. When an indictment or information
charges an offense that is divided into degrees without specifying
the degree, if the defendant pleads guilty, generally the court shall,
before accepting the plea, examine witnesses to determine the
degree of the offense of which the defendant is guilty.

(j) Time and Circumstances of Plea. No defendant,
whether represented by counsel or otherwise, shall be called on to
plead unless and until he or she has had a reasonable time within
which to deliberate thereon.

(k) Responsibility of Court on Pleas. No plea of guilty or
nolo contendere shall be accepted by a court without the court first
determining, in open court, with means of recording the
proceedings stenographically or mechanically, that the
circumstances surrounding the plea reflect a full understanding of
the significance of the plea and its voluntariness and that there is a
factual basis for the plea of guilty. A complete record of the
proceedings at which a defendant pleads shall be kept by the court.

(l) Motion to Withdraw the Plea after Sentencing. A
defendant who pleads guilty or nolo contendere without expressly
reserving the right to appeal a legally dispositive issue may file a
motion to withdraw the plea within thirty days after rendition of the
sentence, but only upon the grounds specified in Florida Rule of
Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a)–(e) except as provided by
law.

(m) Motion to Withdraw the Plea after Drug Court
Transfer. A defendant who pleads guilty or nolo contendere to a
charge for the purpose of transferring the case, pursuant to section
910.035, Florida Statutes, may file a motion to withdraw the plea
upon successful completion of the drug court treatment program.

Committee Notes

1968 Adoption. (a) Patterned after the major portion of
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11.

(b) Same as section 909.07, Florida Statutes, except the
word “made” is substituted for “pleaded.”

(c) Taken from a part of section 908.03, Florida Statutes.

(d) Taken from a part of section 908.03, Florida Statutes.

(e) Same as section 909.16, Florida Statutes, except that
provision is added for trial by affidavit.

(f) Essentially the same as section 909.13, Florida Statutes.

(g) Essentially the same as section 909.09, Florida Statutes,
except for the addition of the charge by affidavit.

(h) Same as section 909.11, Florida Statutes, except
provision is made for a charge by affidavit.
1972 Amendment. This general topic is found in ABA
Standard relating to pleas of guilty. The Standards are divided into
3 parts: receiving and acting upon a plea; withdrawal of the plea;
and plea discussions and plea agreements. The first and second
parts are considered under this rule.

(a) Same as first part of existing rule; substance of second
sentence of existing rule transferred to new subdivision (j); new
provision permits, with court approval, plea of not guilty to be made
in writing.

(b) From ABA Standard 1.2; the purpose of this rule is to
permit a defendant to plead guilty or nolo contendere to all cases
pending against the defendant, thus avoiding multiple judicial and
prosecutorial labors. New concept of permitting this procedure even
though the other cases are pending in other counties is taken from
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 20 which has successfully met
the purpose explained above.

(c) Same as prior rule.

(d) Same as prior rule.

(e) Same as prior rule.

(f) Last sentence added from ABA Standard 2.2.

(g) Same as prior rule.

(h) Same as prior rule.

(i) This should be done in accordance with Boykin v.
Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969), and
Garcia v. State, 228 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 1969). This should also
include advising a defendant so pleading of the possibility of an
action or charge against him or her as a multiple felon if the
circumstances so warrant.

(j) From first sentence of present rule 3.170(a) with addition
of requirement of determination of factual basis for a plea of guilty
as provided by last sentence of federal rule 11. While requiring the
presence of a court reporter, the proposed rule does not require that
the reporter transcribe and file a transcript of the proceedings on a
plea of guilty or nolo contendere, although the committee considers
that such a requirement by the trial judge is desirable.

1973 Amendment. The purpose of this amendment is to
provide a method whereby a defendant may plead guilty to a
misdemeanor at first appearance without the necessity of the state
attorney subsequently filing an information.

Cases Citing Rule 3.170

Total Results: 545

Harrell v. State

894 So. 2d 935, 2005 WL 318570

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2005 | Docket: 1767702

Cited 117 times | Published

against the defendant in a trial of that cause. Rule 3.170(f) limits the opportunity for withdrawing a plea

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

316 So. 2d 267

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1975 | Docket: 410792

Cited 109 times | Published

hurried or treated summarily.[4] Our Criminal Rule 3.170 principally sets forth necessary procedural steps

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

272 So. 2d 65

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1973 | Docket: 1755077

Cited 102 times | Published

shall be made in writing under the provisions of Rule 3.170(a); (3) At any pre-trial conference; unless waived

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sheppard v. State

17 So. 3d 275, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 477, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1412, 2009 WL 2622684

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2009 | Docket: 1644788

Cited 65 times | Published

pro se motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l), which contains specific allegations that

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Warner

762 So. 2d 507, 2000 WL 821675

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2000 | Docket: 1690838

Cited 59 times | Published

consent to a plea to lesser charges; however, rule 3.170 is silent on whether the state must consent where

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jolly v. State

392 So. 2d 54

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 1981 | Docket: 1268252

Cited 56 times | Published

defendant prior to the invalid plea. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f), 3.171, and 3.172. Thus, appellant should

Category: Criminal Procedure

Robinson v. State

761 So. 2d 269, 1999 WL 628777

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 1999 | Docket: 1300131

Cited 47 times | Published

the requirements for withdrawing pleas: *274 Rule 3.170(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

60 So. 3d 1045, 2011 WL 1496466

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 2011 | Docket: 60300040

Cited 42 times | Published

motion to withdraw a plea after sentencing under rule 3.170(0, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Second

Category: Criminal Procedure

Padgett v. State

743 So. 2d 70, 1999 WL 641843

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1999 | Docket: 526331

Cited 42 times | Published

to withdraw plea after sentencing pursuant to rule 3.170(l) as one seeking collateral or "postconviction"

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

500 So. 2d 125, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 10

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1986 | Docket: 1295196

Cited 41 times | Published

459, 460 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975) (violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j)); Broeck v. State, 317 So.2d 100, 100

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Partlow

840 So. 2d 1040, 2003 WL 359316

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2003 | Docket: 1748307

Cited 38 times | Published

permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f) (emphasis added). Under this provision

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davis v. State

308 So. 2d 27

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1975 | Docket: 1672969

Cited 38 times | Published

State, 259 So.2d 200, 203 (Fla. App. 1972). [10] Rule 3.170(f), R.Cr.P.; Brown v. State, supra Note 6. [11]

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tanzi v. State

964 So. 2d 106, 2007 WL 1362862

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2007 | Docket: 1268266

Cited 37 times | Published

lenient presentence standard of rule 3.170(f). Specifically, rule 3.170(f) provides that "[t]he court may

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vinson v. State

345 So. 2d 711

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1977 | Docket: 251667

Cited 34 times | Published

there being no express requirement therefor under Rule 3.170 RCrP, that if the trial judge indeed makes such

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Terry

336 So. 2d 65

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1976 | Docket: 2521736

Cited 30 times | Published

140 Rule 3.150 Rule 3.152 Rule 3.160 Rule 3.170 Rule 3.180 Rule 3.190 Rule 3.210 Rule

Category: Criminal Procedure

Holmes v. State

374 So. 2d 944

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1979 | Docket: 430273

Cited 29 times | Published

permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f). The trial judge found that there was

Category: Criminal Procedure

Simmons v. State

611 So. 2d 1250, 1992 WL 158119

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1992 | Docket: 1757385

Cited 28 times | Published

Levens the court distinguished Setzer as involving rule 3.170(f) rather than 3.850. In concluding that Setzer

Category: Criminal Procedure

Costello v. State

260 So. 2d 198

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1972 | Docket: 1459465

Cited 28 times | Published

under the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rule 3.170 F.R.C.P., 33 F.S.A.). Courts may not, however

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mourra v. State

884 So. 2d 316, 2004 WL 1969521

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 2004 | Docket: 273542

Cited 26 times | Published

such pro se motions should normally be stricken. Rule 3.170(l) provides: Motion to Withdraw the Plea after

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lamadline v. State

303 So. 2d 17

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1974 | Docket: 2467686

Cited 26 times | Published

fully conformed to Florida Criminal Procedure Rule 3.170 and the federal standards set forth in Boykin

Category: Criminal Procedure

Roberts v. State

670 So. 2d 1042, 1996 WL 106350

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1996 | Docket: 1671266

Cited 24 times | Published

531 So.2d 418, 419 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Yesnes. Rule 3.170(f), which governs the withdrawal of pleas before

Category: Criminal Procedure

Daniels v. State

716 So. 2d 827, 1998 WL 537277

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 1998 | Docket: 424574

Cited 23 times | Published

his plea. This court has jurisdiction. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(l); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(iii). On

Category: Criminal Procedure

Yesnes v. State

440 So. 2d 628

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1983 | Docket: 1429949

Cited 23 times | Published

nor presented argument in defendant's behalf. Rule 3.170(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amends. to Fl. Rules of Crim. Proc.

685 So. 2d 1253

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1996 | Docket: 1735082

Cited 22 times | Published

rule 3.800(b) and added new subdivision (1) to rule 3.170. *1255 The appended amendments include the following

Category: Criminal Procedure

Snodgrass v. State

837 So. 2d 507, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 278

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 2003 | Docket: 1527456

Cited 21 times | Published

228 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)).[1] *509 "Although rule 3.170(l) [of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure]

Category: Criminal Procedure

Elledge v. State

706 So. 2d 1340, 1997 WL 574744

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1997 | Docket: 1280671

Cited 21 times | Published

his plea and its voluntariness" as required by rule 3.170(j). See Elledge v. Graham, 432 So.2d 35, 37 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Elledge v. State

706 So. 2d 1340, 1997 WL 574744

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1997 | Docket: 1280671

Cited 21 times | Published

his plea and its voluntariness" as required by rule 3.170(j). See Elledge v. Graham, 432 So.2d 35, 37 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Watrous v. State

793 So. 2d 6, 2001 WL 219982

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 2001 | Docket: 2031700

Cited 20 times | Published

untimely as a motion to withdraw plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l) and facially insufficient as a motion pursuant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dumas v. State

439 So. 2d 246

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1983 | Docket: 1264988

Cited 20 times | Published

guilty plea than for a valid waiver of jury trial. Rule 3.170(j) requires that before a plea of guilty may

Category: Criminal Procedure

Adler v. State

382 So. 2d 1298

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1980 | Docket: 1255650

Cited 20 times | Published

guilty plea prior to imposition of sentence, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f); State v. Braverman, 348 So.2d 1183 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lee v. State

501 So. 2d 591, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 80

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1987 | Docket: 538258

Cited 19 times | Published

the withdrawal of his plea as required under Rule 3.170(f). The trial court, therefore, erred in refusing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Garcia v. State

846 So. 2d 660, 2003 WL 21273777

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2003 | Docket: 1301563

Cited 18 times | Published

warrant a hearing. Because a motion pursuant to rule 3.170 has been treated as a critical stage of proceedings

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wofford v. State

819 So. 2d 891, 2002 WL 1309352

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 2002 | Docket: 1750123

Cited 18 times | Published

indicated his desire to avail himself of the rule 3.170(l) procedure, the trial judge upon remand *892

Category: Criminal Procedure

Scheele v. State

953 So. 2d 782, 2007 WL 675338

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2007 | Docket: 1712888

Cited 17 times | Published

v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla.1996). However, rule 3.170(l) provides that relief may be denied without

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hunt v. State

613 So. 2d 893, 1992 WL 289670

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1992 | Docket: 1511306

Cited 17 times | Published

Hunt's plea prior to imposition of sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f); Adler v. State, 382 So.2d 1298 (Fla.

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Werner

402 So. 2d 386

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1981 | Docket: 1313528

Cited 17 times | Published

257, 92 S.Ct. 495, 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170 & 3.171.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Schriber v. State

959 So. 2d 1254, 2007 WL 1931352

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2007 | Docket: 1525783

Cited 16 times | Published

presented in, and preserved by, the filing of a rule 3.170(l) motion would be hollow indeed if the defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

21 So. 3d 72, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15169, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2058

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 2009 | Docket: 1229956

Cited 15 times | Published

where "a represented defendant files a pro se rule 3.170(l) motion based on allegations giving rise to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Woodly v. State

937 So. 2d 193, 2006 WL 2419145

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2006 | Docket: 937310

Cited 15 times | Published

life sentence if convicted is cognizable under rule 3.170(l). Boule v. State, 884 So.2d 1023, 1024 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Young v. State

608 So. 2d 111, 1992 WL 312824

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1992 | Docket: 1732497

Cited 15 times | Published

lesser offense was subject to court approval. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(g). [4] Because of the procedural posture

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nelfrard v. State

34 So. 3d 221, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6561, 2010 WL 1880496

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 2010 | Docket: 1641428

Cited 14 times | Published

of the motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to Rule 3.170(l), the trial court did not err by summarily

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gidney v. State

925 So. 2d 1076, 2006 WL 625396

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2006 | Docket: 2482404

Cited 14 times | Published

motion because they could have been raised in a rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea. To the extent that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lester v. State

820 So. 2d 1078, 2002 WL 1539652

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2002 | Docket: 1394180

Cited 14 times | Published

indicates his desire to avail himself of the rule 3.170(l) procedure, the trial court must appoint conflict-free

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harris v. State

818 So. 2d 567, 2002 WL 360013

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2002 | Docket: 1652880

Cited 14 times | Published

170(f). The motion is facially insufficient. Rule 3.170(f) permits a motion to withdraw plea to be filed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Seay v. State

286 So. 2d 532

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1973 | Docket: 430530

Cited 14 times | Published

and its method of selection. As to Point I: Rule 3.170(a), F.R.Cr.Pr., allows a defendant, "with the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ruff v. State

840 So. 2d 1145, 2003 WL 1566558

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2003 | Docket: 1463520

Cited 13 times | Published

agreement. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l). Even if we consider Ruff's motion as

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ruff v. State

840 So. 2d 1145, 2003 WL 1566558

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2003 | Docket: 1463520

Cited 13 times | Published

agreement. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l). Even if we consider Ruff's motion as

Category: Criminal Procedure

Onnestad v. State

404 So. 2d 403

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1981 | Docket: 1783278

Cited 13 times | Published

prior to imposition of sentence. Id. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f). In State v. Braverman, 348 So.2d 1183

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

22 So. 3d 840, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18197, 2009 WL 4110869

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2009 | Docket: 2534029

Cited 12 times | Published

[W]hen a represented defendant files a pro se rule 3.170(l) motion based on allegations giving rise to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sharp v. State

884 So. 2d 510, 2004 WL 2289594

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2004 | Docket: 1683096

Cited 12 times | Published

Because Sharp filed the motion after sentencing, rule 3.170(l) governs the motion.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Toson v. State

864 So. 2d 552, 2004 WL 57292

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 2004 | Docket: 1727684

Cited 12 times | Published

same manner as a nolo contendere plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170, 3.171, and 3.172. In the instant case,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gunn v. State

841 So. 2d 629, 2003 WL 1785916

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 2003 | Docket: 1233784

Cited 12 times | Published

sufficient cause to support the withdrawal. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f); Caddo v. State, 806 So.2d 520, 521 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thompson v. Crawford

479 So. 2d 169, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2597

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1985 | Docket: 1514375

Cited 12 times | Published

nullity. The choices of the trial court under Rule 3.170 and the facts of this case were: (1) to accept

Category: Criminal Procedure

Searcy v. State

971 So. 2d 1008, 2008 WL 80164

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 2008 | Docket: 1446931

Cited 11 times | Published

court-appointed counsel to assist in filing a Rule 3.170(l) motion. See Padgett v. State, 743 So.2d 70

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

919 So. 2d 645, 2006 WL 167986

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2006 | Docket: 1269245

Cited 11 times | Published

Id. at 508 (emphasis in original). "Although rule 3.170(l) does not expressly require a trial court to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Robinson v. State

913 So. 2d 514, 2005 WL 1577414

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2005 | Docket: 1331363

Cited 11 times | Published

analyzed the requirements for withdrawing pleas: Rule 3.170(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Metellus v. State

900 So. 2d 491, 2005 WL 106964

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 2005 | Docket: 463262

Cited 11 times | Published

Metellus's noncompliance with the plea agreement. Rule 3.170(g) permits the State to move to vacate a plea

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

849 So. 2d 485, 2003 WL 21673015

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2003 | Docket: 2571151

Cited 11 times | Published

court-appointed counsel to assist in filing a rule 3.170(l) motion. Padgett v. State, 743 So.2d 70, 73

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. of Conn. v. Sealey

810 So. 2d 988, 2002 WL 232792

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2002 | Docket: 1223481

Cited 11 times | Published

correct a sentence or probation order, (10) a rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw a plea, and (11) a rule

Category: Criminal Procedure

Simeton v. State

734 So. 2d 446, 1999 WL 270429

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1999 | Docket: 1731086

Cited 11 times | Published

pursuant to rule 3.170(l) on the grounds that his plea was involuntary. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l). In the

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Warner

721 So. 2d 767, 1998 WL 796526

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1998 | Docket: 1323204

Cited 11 times | Published

consent to a plea to lesser charges; however, rule 3.170 is silent on whether the state must consent where

Category: Criminal Procedure

Setzer v. State

575 So. 2d 747, 1991 WL 22979

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1991 | Docket: 1444180

Cited 11 times | Published

State v. Ginebra, 511 So.2d 960 (Fla. 1987). Rule 3.170(f) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lyles v. State

299 So. 2d 146

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1974 | Docket: 1499071

Cited 11 times | Published

for the plea as required by Criminal Procedure Rule 3.170(j) adopted by the State Supreme Court effective

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rickardo Stephens v. State

141 So. 3d 701, 2014 WL 2957463, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10112

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2014 | Docket: 796838

Cited 10 times | Published

conflict-free counsel. We find error and reverse. Rule 3.170(Z) provides for a motion to withdraw plea within

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Braverman

348 So. 2d 1183

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 1977 | Docket: 1760175

Cited 10 times | Published

withdraw his nolo contendere pleas pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f). The motion alleged three grounds as good

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Vinson

320 So. 2d 50

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 1975 | Docket: 1409010

Cited 10 times | Published

there being no express requirement therefor under Rule 3.170, RCrP, that if the trial judge indeed makes such

Category: Criminal Procedure

Weathington v. State

262 So. 2d 724

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1972 | Docket: 429179

Cited 10 times | Published

State, Fla.App. 1967, 204 So.2d 26; also see Rule 3.170, R.Cr.P., 33 F.S.A.; American Bar Association

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bermudez v. State

901 So. 2d 981, 2005 WL 1109623

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2005 | Docket: 1216636

Cited 9 times | Published

of the sentence, the deadline imposed by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(1). 3. Alternatively, the Court's factual

Category: Criminal Procedure

Barber v. State

901 So. 2d 364, 2005 WL 1047287

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 2005 | Docket: 1666240

Cited 9 times | Published

similar circumstances must be made pursuant to Rule 3.170(l), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, within

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jackson v. State

801 So. 2d 1024, 2001 WL 1635450

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2001 | Docket: 1495046

Cited 9 times | Published

order to preserve the issue for appeal. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(l). His failure to file such a motion raises

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dolinger v. State

779 So. 2d 419, 2000 WL 1468584

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2000 | Docket: 1521028

Cited 9 times | Published

days after rendition of a sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l). The trial court correctly reasoned that

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.

606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1992 | Docket: 2191048

Cited 9 times | Published

follow the language set out in 528 So.2d at 1180. RULE 3.170. PLEAS (a) Types of Plea; Court's Discretion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hall v. State

316 So. 2d 279

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1975 | Docket: 1456151

Cited 9 times | Published

guilty plea inquiry, and it did not comply with Rule 3.170(j). We wish to emphasize, however, that the responsibility

Category: Criminal Procedure

Estes v. State

294 So. 2d 122

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1974 | Docket: 1736296

Cited 9 times | Published

the plea of guilty as required by newly adopted Rule 3.170(j), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F

Category: Criminal Procedure

Enos v. State

272 So. 2d 847

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1973 | Docket: 1644664

Cited 9 times | Published

his plea of nolo contendere as contemplated by Rule 3.170 not only demonstrates the fallacy of defendant's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

74 So. 3d 118, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14044, 2011 WL 3905061

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2011 | Docket: 2358525

Cited 8 times | Published

plea, as contemplated by the rule. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f) ("The court may in its discretion, and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Alfred v. State

998 So. 2d 1197, 2009 WL 77987

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 2009 | Docket: 1701651

Cited 8 times | Published

Alfred timely appeals the denial of his pro se rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw his no contest plea, as

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

922 So. 2d 1088, 2006 WL 708558

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2006 | Docket: 1282389

Cited 8 times | Published

withdraw a plea after sentencing pursuant to Rule 3.170(l). Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h). When such a motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Taylor v. State

919 So. 2d 669, 2006 WL 197215

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2006 | Docket: 1269121

Cited 8 times | Published

Procedure 9.140, such a claim should be raised in a rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea. Taylor now urges

Category: Criminal Procedure

Norman v. State

897 So. 2d 553, 2005 WL 771325

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2005 | Docket: 2558806

Cited 8 times | Published

indicates his desire to avail himself of the rule 3.170(l) procedure, the trial court must appoint conflict-free

Category: Criminal Procedure

Childers v. State

782 So. 2d 513, 2001 WL 326666

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2001 | Docket: 1512088

Cited 8 times | Published

signed a plea which addressed some of what Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170 requires that a defendant understand before

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fortini v. State

472 So. 2d 1383, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1855

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1985 | Docket: 1793254

Cited 8 times | Published

382 So.2d at 1300 (citation omitted). See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f). In Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ladell Spann, Etc. v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc.

742 F.2d 606, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18332

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 24, 1984 | Docket: 486751

Cited 8 times | Published

the trial judge the same discretion. See FLA.R.CRIM.P. 3.170(j); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.171(c), 272 So.2d 65

Category: Criminal Procedure

Balderrama v. State

433 So. 2d 1311

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1983 | Docket: 1425858

Cited 8 times | Published

is a factual basis for the guilty plea. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j). The purpose of the requirement that a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Waters v. State

354 So. 2d 1277

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1978 | Docket: 1682189

Cited 8 times | Published

outlined a factual basis as required under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j); however, no mention was made of the value

Category: Criminal Procedure

State Ex Rel. Evans v. Chappel

308 So. 2d 1

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1975 | Docket: 1251193

Cited 8 times | Published

shall be made in writing under the provisions of Rule 3.170(a)." By express terms of Cr.P.R. 3.160(a), the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davis v. State

153 So. 3d 399, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20571, 2014 WL 7183249

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2014 | Docket: 60245241

Cited 7 times | Published

withdraw the plea prior to sentencing. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f). The trial court conducted an evidentiary

Category: Criminal Procedure

Griffin v. State

114 So. 3d 890, 2013 WL 2096350

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2013 | Docket: 60232014

Cited 7 times | Published

specifically support Griffin’s argument regarding his rule 3.170(£) motion. In Kilgore, the defendant was indicted

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

971 So. 2d 212, 2008 WL 34806

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 2008 | Docket: 1446548

Cited 7 times | Published

Johnson filed a motion to withdraw plea under rule 3.170(f), alleging that his trial counsel failed to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

932 So. 2d 1169, 2006 WL 1788559

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2006 | Docket: 1981172

Cited 7 times | Published

pursuant to Florida Statute Criminal Procedure Rule 3.170(l)." In Mourra, this court stated, "We are not

Category: Criminal Procedure

Scott v. State

909 So. 2d 364, 2005 WL 1787446

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 2005 | Docket: 1663292

Cited 7 times | Published

accept a plea negotiated by the parties. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(a); 3.171(d). While Scott may believe Judge

Category: Criminal Procedure

Boule v. State

884 So. 2d 1023, 2004 WL 2289617

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2004 | Docket: 1683121

Cited 7 times | Published

valid basis to seek withdrawal of a plea under rule 3.170(l). See Cherry, 837 So.2d at 598 ("A defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

835 So. 2d 402, 2003 WL 202675

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2003 | Docket: 1754995

Cited 7 times | Published

plea. A motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to rule 3.170(2) is a "critical stage in the direct criminal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

821 So. 2d 1267, 2002 WL 1769002

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 2002 | Docket: 1236384

Cited 7 times | Published

after the rendition of his sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l) (allowing thirty days after the rendition

Category: Criminal Procedure

Caddo v. State

806 So. 2d 520, 2001 WL 1283987

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2001 | Docket: 1713033

Cited 7 times | Published

court shall allow the plea to be withdrawn. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f). Threats and coercion, if established

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thornton v. State

747 So. 2d 439, 1999 WL 1191447

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1999 | Docket: 1475793

Cited 7 times | Published

plea. This court has jurisdiction. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(1); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(iii).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gunn v. State

643 So. 2d 677, 1994 WL 551473

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1994 | Docket: 1493223

Cited 7 times | Published

"[m]otion denied" and proceeded to sentencing. Rule 3.170(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cox v. State

412 So. 2d 354

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1982 | Docket: 528418

Cited 7 times | Published

nullity. The choices of the trial court under Rule 3.170 and the facts of this case were: (1) to accept

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hernandez v. State

137 So. 3d 542, 2014 WL 1374046, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5161

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 2014 | Docket: 60240354

Cited 6 times | Published

Comparato’s holding that the mandatory language of rule 3.170, requiring a PSI for all first-time felony offenders

Category: Criminal Procedure

Campbell v. State

125 So. 3d 733, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 727, 2013 WL 5641531, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2290

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2013 | Docket: 60236060

Cited 6 times | Published

140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a)-(e)4 except as provided by law. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170((). The requirement of manifest injustice

Category: Criminal Procedure

KRAUTHEIM v. State

38 So. 3d 802, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8233, 2010 WL 2330243

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 2010 | Docket: 1184228

Cited 6 times | Published

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, that rule 3.170(l) did not apply to admissions to violations

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sheppard v. State

988 So. 2d 74, 2008 WL 2744496

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2008 | Docket: 1722138

Cited 6 times | Published

motion should have been stricken because "[a] rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea filed by a criminal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Whiting v. State

929 So. 2d 673, 2006 WL 1359343

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2006 | Docket: 1422631

Cited 6 times | Published

unauthorized. We remand with directions to strike the Rule 3.170(l) motion. CAUSE REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS. SHARP

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cella v. State

831 So. 2d 716, 2002 WL 31431560

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2002 | Docket: 1723014

Cited 6 times | Published

of Criminal Procedure 3.850. This was error. Rule 3.170(l), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, clearly

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

762 So. 2d 990, 2000 WL 827072

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 2000 | Docket: 1311161

Cited 6 times | Published

permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn...." Rule 3.170(f) should be liberally construed in favor of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Caristi v. State

578 So. 2d 769, 1991 WL 54130

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1991 | Docket: 440939

Cited 6 times | Published

alleging in part that: (1) the requirements of rule 3.170 were not satisfied; (2) the requirements of rule

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lee v. State

490 So. 2d 80, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 193

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1986 | Docket: 1488869

Cited 6 times | Published

for the withdrawal of his plea, as required by rule 3.170(f), his motion should have been granted. I would

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lee v. State

490 So. 2d 80, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 193

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1986 | Docket: 1488869

Cited 6 times | Published

for the withdrawal of his plea, as required by rule 3.170(f), his motion should have been granted. I would

Category: Criminal Procedure

Monroe v. State

318 So. 2d 571

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1975 | Docket: 1476595

Cited 6 times | Published

plea without first determining, as required by Rule 3.170(j) RCrP, that there was a factual basis for the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mower v. State

308 So. 2d 586

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1975 | Docket: 1672873

Cited 6 times | Published

acceptance of the plea. Appellant contends that Rule 3.170(j) RCrP mandates that the factual basis be determined

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hall v. State

303 So. 2d 417

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1974 | Docket: 1691662

Cited 6 times | Published

the acceptance of a guilty plea as required by Rule 3.170(j), CrPR.[1] Appellant does not claim that his

Category: Criminal Procedure

Golden v. State

84 So. 3d 396, 2012 WL 987405, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4593

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2012 | Docket: 2415076

Cited 5 times | Published

dismissed, 598 So.2d 78 (Fla. 1992). Pursuant to rule 3.170(l), Golden's counsel had until April 4, 2010

Category: Criminal Procedure

Echeverria v. State

33 So. 3d 802, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5531, 2010 WL 1641464

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2010 | Docket: 285216

Cited 5 times | Published

who is represented by counsel files a pro se rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw a plea based on allegations

Category: Criminal Procedure

Simmons v. State

24 So. 3d 636, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19068, 2009 WL 4640660

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2009 | Docket: 1152634

Cited 5 times | Published

follow when a represented defendant files a pro se rule 3.170(l) motion based on allegations giving rise to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wendt v. State

19 So. 3d 1024, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12833, 2009 WL 2762723

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 2009 | Docket: 1651025

Cited 5 times | Published

hearing. FAILURE TO APPOINT CONFLICT-FREE COUNSEL Rule 3.170(l) permits a defendant to file a motion to withdraw

Category: Criminal Procedure

Reaves v. State

979 So. 2d 1066, 2008 WL 828953

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2008 | Docket: 1714233

Cited 5 times | Published

to be withdrawn before sentencing. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f). Since it is fundamental error to accept

Category: Criminal Procedure

Townsend v. State

927 So. 2d 1064, 2006 WL 1236051

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2006 | Docket: 1765270

Cited 5 times | Published

when the plea was entered involuntarily. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)c.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kelly v. State

925 So. 2d 383, 2006 WL 625746

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2006 | Docket: 471670

Cited 5 times | Published

presented in, and preserved by, the filing of a rule 3.170(l) motion would be hollow indeed if the defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kelly v. State

925 So. 2d 383, 2006 WL 625746

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2006 | Docket: 471670

Cited 5 times | Published

presented in, and preserved by, the filing of a rule 3.170(l) motion would be hollow indeed if the defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mattia v. State

907 So. 2d 683, 2005 WL 1789091

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 2005 | Docket: 233846

Cited 5 times | Published

A motion to withdraw plea filed pursuant to rule 3.170 is a critical stage of the proceedings in the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ragoobar v. State

893 So. 2d 647, 2005 WL 356612

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2005 | Docket: 1720741

Cited 5 times | Published

withdraw his plea to counts I and II, pursuant to rule 3.170(l) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Daniel v. State

865 So. 2d 661, 2004 WL 298407

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2004 | Docket: 1674328

Cited 5 times | Published

Since a motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l) is a "critical stage" in which the defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dooley v. State

789 So. 2d 1082, 2001 WL 673580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2001 | Docket: 2513257

Cited 5 times | Published

timely filed under rule 3.170(l). We cannot agree with the state's argument. Rule 3.170(l) provides: "A

Category: Criminal Procedure

Eulo v. State

786 So. 2d 43, 2001 WL 527530

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2001 | Docket: 1278436

Cited 5 times | Published

Within ten days of sentencing appellant filed a rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea and vacate sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gregory Hardy v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections, Michael W. Moore, Secretary

246 F.3d 1300

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 16, 2001 | Docket: 2132881

Cited 5 times | Published

appeal, Hardy filed a motion pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f) to withdraw his plea. Upon Hardy’s request

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davis v. State

783 So. 2d 288, 2001 WL 280032

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2001 | Docket: 1259526

Cited 5 times | Published

State, 260 So.2d 198, 200 (Fla.1972). Pursuant to rule 3.170(f) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Weidner v. State

767 So. 2d 604, 2000 WL 1283821

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2000 | Docket: 1661501

Cited 5 times | Published

denied appellant's motion. We affirm. Pursuant to rule 3.170(l), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, appellant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Timothee v. State

721 So. 2d 776, 1998 WL 821789

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 25, 1998 | Docket: 1323396

Cited 5 times | Published

permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn...." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f). This rule should be liberally construed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Green v. State

700 So. 2d 384, 1997 WL 422525

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1997 | Docket: 1373634

Cited 5 times | Published

rule to address the situation or have amended Rule 3.170 as it did. Accordingly, an instance in which

Category: Criminal Procedure

Russell v. State

614 So. 2d 605, 1993 WL 43868

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1993 | Docket: 1509818

Cited 5 times | Published

the witness's mother were inadmissible under rule 3.170(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Green v. State

406 So. 2d 1148

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1981 | Docket: 449796

Cited 5 times | Published

significance of the plea and its voluntariness." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j) (1972). However, as noted above, the presently

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kadar v. State

370 So. 2d 1231

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1979 | Docket: 1722529

Cited 5 times | Published

to him a number of times concerning it. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j) requires that the court shall not accept

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kadar v. State

370 So. 2d 1231

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1979 | Docket: 1722529

Cited 5 times | Published

to him a number of times concerning it. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j) requires that the court shall not accept

Category: Criminal Procedure

HAAGER v. State

36 So. 3d 883, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7695, 2010 WL 2219192

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2010 | Docket: 2409622

Cited 4 times | Published

concluding that the claim was untimely under both rule 3.170 and rule 3.850. In a motion for rehearing, Haager

Category: Criminal Procedure

Panchu v. State

1 So. 3d 1243, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1111, 2009 WL 321569

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2009 | Docket: 1653757

Cited 4 times | Published

140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a)-(e) except as provided by law." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l) (2008). Here, the defendant based her

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morales v. State

973 So. 2d 679, 2008 WL 373626

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2008 | Docket: 1292789

Cited 4 times | Published

distinction that would render J.D.F. inapplicable here. Rule 3.170(f) allows a defendant to move to withdraw his

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wright v. State

961 So. 2d 1036, 2007 WL 2043449

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2007 | Docket: 468759

Cited 4 times | Published

WL 1362862 (Fla. May 10, 2007) (quoting Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f)) (emphasis added). Our supreme court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

959 So. 2d 830, 2007 WL 1988829

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 2007 | Docket: 1525791

Cited 4 times | Published

("A motion to withdraw plea filed pursuant to rule 3.170 is a critical stage of the proceedings in the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Johnson v. State

947 So. 2d 1208, 2007 WL 186802

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 2007 | Docket: 1376525

Cited 4 times | Published

his murder trial is enough to meet the test of Rule 3.170(f). Failure to inform him of this collateral

Category: Criminal Procedure

Meeks v. State

841 So. 2d 648, 2003 WL 1823464

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 2003 | Docket: 2556221

Cited 4 times | Published

1999). A motion to withdraw plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l) is such a critical stage of the criminal proceedings

Category: Criminal Procedure

Miller v. State

838 So. 2d 1213, 2003 WL 727792

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2003 | Docket: 715405

Cited 4 times | Published

advise and assist with motions filed pursuant to rule 3.170(l). See Lester v. State, 820 So.2d 1078 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Metellus v. State

817 So. 2d 1009, 2002 WL 1084166

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2002 | Docket: 1430136

Cited 4 times | Published

established a procedure, which has been codified in rule 3.170(g), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, whereby

Category: Criminal Procedure

Baker v. State

804 So. 2d 564, 2002 WL 63354

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2002 | Docket: 1699446

Cited 4 times | Published

actual admission of having done so. [3] See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(e); Licata v. State, 81 Fla. 649, 88 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodgers v. State

765 So. 2d 195, 2000 WL 990929

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2000 | Docket: 164731

Cited 4 times | Published

filed a motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. At the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Martinez v. Fraxedas

678 So. 2d 489, 1996 WL 470876

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 1996 | Docket: 1470812

Cited 4 times | Published

otherwise remained mute on this issue.[10]But compare Rule 3.170(c), Fla. R.Crim. P. ("If a defendant stands mute

Category: Criminal Procedure

Martinez v. Fraxedas

678 So. 2d 489, 1996 WL 470876

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 1996 | Docket: 1470812

Cited 4 times | Published

otherwise remained mute on this issue.[10]But compare Rule 3.170(c), Fla. R.Crim. P. ("If a defendant stands mute

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

661 So. 2d 95, 1995 WL 521091

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 1995 | Docket: 1526490

Cited 4 times | Published

pursuant to rule 3.170 and rule 3.172 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Rule 3.170 provides in

Category: Criminal Procedure

Watson v. State

667 So. 2d 242, 1995 WL 497003

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1995 | Docket: 144227

Cited 4 times | Published

addressed to the discretion of the trial court. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f). However, such discretion is not unbridled

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. McClain

509 So. 2d 1360, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1805

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 1987 | Docket: 1715347

Cited 4 times | Published

the court and of the prosecuting attorney. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(g). Since the prosecuting attorney did not

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

468 So. 2d 253, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 498

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1985 | Docket: 1402265

Cited 4 times | Published

document and freely and voluntarily signed it. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j). The defense attorney stipulated that

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Reasbeck

359 So. 2d 564

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1978 | Docket: 1735697

Cited 4 times | Published

Prohibition which we grant. At issue is Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(g)[1] and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(f)[2] as they

Category: Criminal Procedure

Miles v. State

338 So. 2d 547

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1976 | Docket: 1511876

Cited 4 times | Published

court failed to comply with the provision of Rule 3.170(j) RCrP which required that there be a determination

Category: Criminal Procedure

Estes v. State

316 So. 2d 276

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1975 | Docket: 410788

Cited 4 times | Published

that "the factual basis clause in that rule [Rule 3.170(j)] is inapplicable in cases where the guilty

Category: Criminal Procedure

United States v. Clifford B. Gandy, Jr.

917 F.3d 1333

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 6, 2019 | Docket: 14627611

Cited 3 times | Published

adjudicate Gandy guilty of that charge. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170. The following hypothetical illustrates

Category: Criminal Procedure

Anderson v. State

183 So. 3d 1146, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19519, 2015 WL 9491860

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2015 | Docket: 60252938

Cited 3 times | Published

passed since Anderson’s initial appeal. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(Z). Our order was without prejudice to pursue

Category: Criminal Procedure

Motes v. State

129 So. 3d 446, 2013 WL 6865084, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20726

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2013 | Docket: 60237400

Cited 3 times | Published

denying his motion to withdraw his plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(i). Appellant moved to withdraw his plea

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wilson v. State

128 So. 3d 898, 2013 WL 6635915, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19965

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2013 | Docket: 60237202

Cited 3 times | Published

a timely rule 3.170(Z) motion to withdraw plea, which remains pending. A timely rule 3.170(£) motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rappaport v. State

24 So. 3d 1211, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20017, 2009 WL 5064039

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2009 | Docket: 1648344

Cited 3 times | Published

DCA 2008). In considering a motion filed under rule 3.170(f), "a trial court is required to allow withdrawal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carter v. State

22 So. 3d 793, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17302, 2009 WL 3878544

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 2009 | Docket: 1639634

Cited 3 times | Published

when a represented defendant brings a pro se rule 3.170(l) motion based on conflict with counsel: [W]hen

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nelson v. State

18 So. 3d 1190, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14497, 2009 WL 3108569

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2009 | Docket: 1179741

Cited 3 times | Published

a represented defendant files a timely pro se Rule 3.170(l) motion, the trial court should first determine

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williamson v. State

974 So. 2d 582, 2008 WL 441953

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2008 | Docket: 1717445

Cited 3 times | Published

filed a timely motion to withdraw his plea under rule 3.170(l), there is no guarantee that he would have

Category: Criminal Procedure

McKnight v. State

964 So. 2d 803, 2007 WL 2710885

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 2007 | Docket: 1182648

Cited 3 times | Published

that the appellant's motion was untimely. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l). Rendition of sentence occurred on November

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kerney v. State

945 So. 2d 657, 2007 WL 101984

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2007 | Docket: 1725420

Cited 3 times | Published

Where a defendant files a facially insufficient rule 3.170(l) motion, he is not entitled to an evidentiary

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Rules of Criminal Procedure

942 So. 2d 407, 2006 WL 3229930

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2006 | Docket: 1471518

Cited 3 times | Published

appendix to this opinion.[1] *408 AMENDMENTS Rule 3.170(f), Withdrawal of Plea of Guilty, which currently

Category: Criminal Procedure

King v. State

939 So. 2d 1196, 2006 WL 3019934

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2006 | Docket: 2570896

Cited 3 times | Published

se motion to withdraw his plea in each case. A rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea filed by a criminal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Leach v. State

914 So. 2d 519, 2005 WL 3116102

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 2005 | Docket: 1781716

Cited 3 times | Published

appeal by bringing his involuntariness claim under rule 3.170(l), which concerns a motion to withdraw a plea

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amend. to Rule of Crim. Proc. 3.172

911 So. 2d 763, 2005 WL 2095666

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2005 | Docket: 1501198

Cited 3 times | Published

appropriate to expand the language of former rule 3.170(j) (deleted) and establish a separate rule. Incorporates

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hernandez v. KISSIMMEE POLICE DEPT.

901 So. 2d 420, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7565, 2005 WL 1185820

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2005 | Docket: 1666229

Cited 3 times | Published

reasoned as follows: The Fifth District held that rule 3.170(g)(2)(A) is not jurisdictional because it permits

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

900 So. 2d 732, 2005 WL 957601

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2005 | Docket: 1161860

Cited 3 times | Published

timely motion to withdraw a plea is filed under rule 3.170(l) and is pending at the time of the filing of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wagner v. State

895 So. 2d 453, 2005 WL 263770

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2005 | Docket: 1674358

Cited 3 times | Published

permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f).[3] Here, because Wagner *456 moved to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Newsome v. State

877 So. 2d 938, 2004 WL 1666417

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 2004 | Docket: 1684616

Cited 3 times | Published

allegation" that was not a ground for relief under rule 3.170(l). Harris was therefore not entitled to either

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lyell v. State

872 So. 2d 447, 2004 WL 1071798

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 2004 | Docket: 1476158

Cited 3 times | Published

850. It treated the motion as one pursuant to rule 3.170(l) and denied it as untimely because it was filed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Peloquin v. State

858 So. 2d 1213, 2003 WL 22657891

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2003 | Docket: 831271

Cited 3 times | Published

the trial court's summary denial of appellant's Rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw a number of nolo contendere

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ventura v. State

820 So. 2d 1026, 2002 WL 1430581

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2002 | Docket: 1362278

Cited 3 times | Published

summarily denied the motion and this appeal followed. Rule 3.170(f) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Joslin v. State

826 So. 2d 324, 2002 WL 440552

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2002 | Docket: 1662871

Cited 3 times | Published

the specific terms of a plea agreement." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(g); see also McCoy v. State, 599 So.2d 645

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gadson v. State

807 So. 2d 817, 2002 WL 270299

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 2002 | Docket: 2556581

Cited 3 times | Published

successive because: the prior motion was filed under rule 3.170; the motion was not explicitly treated by the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harris v. State

801 So. 2d 973, 2001 WL 1538949

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2001 | Docket: 1495388

Cited 3 times | Published

raised in the motion were not raised in the prior rule 3.170(l) motion. In the 3.850 motion, Harris alleged

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

793 So. 2d 1112, 2001 WL 1007941

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2001 | Docket: 1266271

Cited 3 times | Published

A motion to withdraw plea filed pursuant to rule 3.170(l), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, is considered

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hall v. State

765 So. 2d 282, 2000 WL 1154044

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2000 | Docket: 428843

Cited 3 times | Published

Procedure, 685 So.2d 1253, 1257 (Fla.1996)(quoting rule 3.170). A defendant who pleads guilty or nolo contendere

Category: Criminal Procedure

Goodwin v. State

598 So. 2d 295, 1992 WL 102453

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1992 | Docket: 335247

Cited 3 times | Published

contest plea to various felony charges. We reverse. Rule 3.170(j), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, states

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

585 So. 2d 350, 1991 WL 147680

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1991 | Docket: 1688613

Cited 3 times | Published

with the constitutional mandate of Boykin under rule 3.170, set out the essential requirements for taking

Category: Criminal Procedure

Simmons v. State

579 So. 2d 874, 1991 WL 85520

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 1991 | Docket: 2533626

Cited 3 times | Published

plea are provided by Rules 3.170(f) and 3.850. Rule 3.170(f) must be invoked prior to sentencing, and the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Holt v. State

516 So. 2d 25, 1987 WL 1580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1987 | Docket: 2568924

Cited 3 times | Published

entered by the court on Holt's behalf. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(c). The *26 clear terms of Rule 3.140(g)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wade v. State

488 So. 2d 127, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1057

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 1986 | Docket: 1685355

Cited 3 times | Published

So.2d 628 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); see also Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.170(f). Accordingly, the judgment of the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Simmons v. State

489 So. 2d 43, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 413

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1986 | Docket: 1528901

Cited 3 times | Published

So.2d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). See also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j). It is not a sufficient predicate for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hayward v. State

467 So. 2d 462

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1985 | Docket: 1275204

Cited 3 times | Published

procedural rights. It is for that reason that Rule 3.170(i) and (j) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Cox

399 So. 2d 1067

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1981 | Docket: 1652225

Cited 3 times | Published

offense than that charged in the information. Rule 3.170(g) reads as such: (g) Plea of Guilty to Lesser

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Laury

397 So. 2d 960

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1981 | Docket: 1357098

Cited 3 times | Published

court found a factual basis for the plea (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j)) and accepted it but did not then adjudicate

Category: Criminal Procedure

Norris v. State

343 So. 2d 964

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1977 | Docket: 1376184

Cited 3 times | Published

apprised of the significance of her plea. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j); Brown v. State, 245 So.2d 41 (Fla. 1971);

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

312 So. 2d 528

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1975 | Docket: 1734553

Cited 3 times | Published

basis for the plea be shown as is required by Rule 3.170(j), F.R.Cr.P. Appellee relies upon our previous

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kendrick v. State

308 So. 2d 152

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1975 | Docket: 1251534

Cited 3 times | Published

three years on the aggravated assault offense. Rule 3.170(j), FRCrP, requires the court to determine that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Church v. State

299 So. 2d 649

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1974 | Docket: 1499074

Cited 3 times | Published

sentence. We take this occasion to point out that Rule 3.170(j), RCrP,[1] which prescribes the responsibilities

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carroll v. State

266 So. 3d 1270

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2019 | Docket: 64708584

Cited 2 times | Published

pro se motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to Rule 3.170(l ).1 The trial court, relying on Cunningham

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

225 So. 3d 349, 2017 WL 3400608, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11433

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 2017 | Docket: 6135181

Cited 2 times | Published

and intelligently accepting a plea. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(k) (“No plea of guilty or nolo contender

Category: Criminal Procedure

Parrish v. State

201 So. 3d 145, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 96

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2016 | Docket: 3026006

Cited 2 times | Published

is silent as to whether Parrish filed a timely Rule 3.170(0 motion to withdraw his plea—a condition precedent

Category: Criminal Procedure

Neal v. State

142 So. 3d 883, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7598, 2014 WL 2086938

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2014 | Docket: 60242230

Cited 2 times | Published

to Withdraw Plea after Sentencing, pursuant to rule 3.170(i), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. He alleged

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure & the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

132 So. 3d 734, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 884, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2638, 2013 WL 6331351

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2013 | Docket: 60238541

Cited 2 times | Published

the postconviction rules and the deletion of rule 3.170(i). As explained in the joint petition, the proposed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Saintiler v. State

109 So. 3d 303, 2013 WL 811607, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3518

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2013 | Docket: 60229555

Cited 2 times | Published

robbery charge. He also appeals the denial of his Rule 3.170(i) motion to withdraw his plea to these charges

Category: Criminal Procedure

DM v. State

84 So. 3d 1242, 2012 WL 1232622

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2012 | Docket: 2415017

Cited 2 times | Published

withdraw his pleas were not filed pursuant to rule 3.170(l) because that rule applies to criminal cases

Category: Criminal Procedure

D.M. v. State

84 So. 3d 1242, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5626

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2012 | Docket: 60306638

Cited 2 times | Published

withdraw his pleas were not filed pursuant to rule 3.170(Z) because that rule applies to criminal cases

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davis v. State

52 So. 3d 697, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12181, 2010 WL 3239148

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 2010 | Docket: 60297839

Cited 2 times | Published

it was not necessary to hold a hearing on the rule 3.170(() motion because the motion contained no factual

Category: Criminal Procedure

Norman v. State

43 So. 3d 771, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11088, 2010 WL 2976515

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2010 | Docket: 2398744

Cited 2 times | Published

not honor his plea agreement with the State. "[Rule] 3.170(l) permits a defendant to file a motion to withdraw

Category: Criminal Procedure

Woodall v. State

39 So. 3d 419, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9210, 2010 WL 2539429

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 2010 | Docket: 2409195

Cited 2 times | Published

of seven years’ imprisonment. He later filed a rule 3.170(£) motion to withdraw his plea, claiming it was

Category: Criminal Procedure

Reeves v. State

23 So. 3d 1263, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20399, 2009 WL 5126522

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2009 | Docket: 1181543

Cited 2 times | Published

alleged violation of the plea agreement pursuant to Rule 3.170(1), Fla. R.Crim. P., and Rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(b)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Applegate v. State

23 So. 3d 211, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18393, 2009 WL 4282283

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 2009 | Docket: 60282003

Cited 2 times | Published

2d 716, 717 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (holding that rule 3.170(i) was proper vehicle to challenge plea where

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gonzalez v. State

21 So. 3d 169, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16866, 2009 WL 3787776

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2009 | Docket: 1418563

Cited 2 times | Published

pro se motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l), which contains specific allegations that

Category: Criminal Procedure

White v. State

15 So. 3d 833, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10128, 2009 WL 2194679

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2009 | Docket: 1191524

Cited 2 times | Published

there?" On July 3, 2008, Mr. White filed a pro se rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea. Mr. White's motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Luedtke v. State

6 So. 3d 653, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1806, 2009 WL 530392

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2009 | Docket: 1671972

Cited 2 times | Published

move to withdraw his plea at that time. Under rule 3.170(f), the trial court may, in its discretion, and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Golden v. State

987 So. 2d 1279, 2008 WL 3851697

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2008 | Docket: 1392390

Cited 2 times | Published

conflict-free counsel. A motion filed pursuant to rule 3.170(l) is a critical stage of the proceedings, thus

Category: Criminal Procedure

Golden v. State

987 So. 2d 1279, 2008 WL 3851697

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2008 | Docket: 1392390

Cited 2 times | Published

conflict-free counsel. A motion filed pursuant to rule 3.170(l) is a critical stage of the proceedings, thus

Category: Criminal Procedure

Balkaran v. State

950 So. 2d 478, 2007 WL 518592

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2007 | Docket: 1501984

Cited 2 times | Published

similar circumstances must be made pursuant to rule 3.170(l), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, within

Category: Criminal Procedure

Adams v. State

942 So. 2d 1024, 2006 WL 3498584

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2006 | Docket: 2543657

Cited 2 times | Published

timely-filed motion to withdraw a plea under rule 3.170(l) is pending, the final judgment of conviction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Murphy v. State

939 So. 2d 1168, 2006 WL 3018393

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2006 | Docket: 1180459

Cited 2 times | Published

also timely moved to withdraw his plea under rule 3.170(l), and contends that the court erred in denying

Category: Criminal Procedure

Youngblood v. State

930 So. 2d 852, 2006 WL 1641976

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2006 | Docket: 2560829

Cited 2 times | Published

reverse and remand. The failure to file a timely rule 3.170(l) motion does not prevent an involuntary plea

Category: Criminal Procedure

Harris v. State

911 So. 2d 221, 2005 WL 2321699

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2005 | Docket: 1207243

Cited 2 times | Published

has any practical impact on Mr. Harris. [2] Rule 3.170(l) contains no such requirement, but a motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Murray v. State

909 So. 2d 998, 2005 WL 2217967

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2005 | Docket: 1199742

Cited 2 times | Published

rendered and was timely as a motion pursuant to rule 3.170(I). It does not contain the content required

Category: Criminal Procedure

Young v. State

910 So. 2d 899, 2005 WL 2205355

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2005 | Docket: 2572692

Cited 2 times | Published

indicates his desire to avail himself of the rule 3.170(l) procedure, the trial court must appoint conflict-free

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dines v. State

909 So. 2d 521, 2005 WL 2044521

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2005 | Docket: 1663222

Cited 2 times | Published

knowingly given before it is accepted. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(k). Strickland requires that counsel be

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nicol v. State

892 So. 2d 1169, 2005 WL 264106

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2005 | Docket: 472278

Cited 2 times | Published

wrong standard in denying his motion. We agree. Rule 3.170(f) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas v. State

884 So. 2d 309, 2004 WL 1882491

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2004 | Docket: 1282138

Cited 2 times | Published

reconsideration as an unauthorized motion under rule 3.170(l). We therefore affirm the February 13 and 21

Category: Criminal Procedure

Waldrop v. State

882 So. 2d 1047, 2004 WL 1845540

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 2004 | Docket: 285337

Cited 2 times | Published

not permitted to withdraw his plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l). Accordingly, the trial court abused

Category: Criminal Procedure

McFord v. State

877 So. 2d 874, 2004 WL 1562967

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 2004 | Docket: 1684469

Cited 2 times | Published

State moved to vacate the plea pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(g). At the hearing on the motion, the Defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wofford v. State

866 So. 2d 774, 2004 WL 367708

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 2004 | Docket: 1273946

Cited 2 times | Published

Wofford's timely motion to withdraw plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l). See Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h); see also Wofford

Category: Criminal Procedure

Walker v. State

863 So. 2d 355, 2003 WL 22461298

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 2003 | Docket: 1756193

Cited 2 times | Published

pursuant to rule 3.800. Unlike rule 3.850, neither rule 3.170(l) nor rule 3.800 required the circuit *356 court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ehouse v. State

817 So. 2d 1067, 2002 WL 1231714

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2002 | Docket: 1268556

Cited 2 times | Published

30 days after rendition of the sentence. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l). The appellant argues that the Department

Category: Criminal Procedure

Roesch v. State

819 So. 2d 862, 2002 WL 1049744

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2002 | Docket: 2510062

Cited 2 times | Published

filed after sentencing, and is thus governed by rule 3.170(l), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. None

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lepper v. State

826 So. 2d 363, 2002 WL 946267

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2002 | Docket: 1197536

Cited 2 times | Published

proceeded as though the motion was filed pursuant to rule 3.170(l). That rule allows a defendant to attempt to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Partlow v. State

813 So. 2d 999, 2002 WL 429073

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2002 | Docket: 1403084

Cited 2 times | Published

would also seem inconsistent with the command of rule 3.170(f) that the court "shall on good cause, at any

Category: Criminal Procedure

Demartine v. State

647 So. 2d 900, 1994 WL 655319

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1994 | Docket: 2551973

Cited 2 times | Published

appropriate to expand the language of former rule 3.170(j) (deleted) and establish a separate rule. Committee

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brady v. State

518 So. 2d 1305, 1987 WL 1335

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1987 | Docket: 1778583

Cited 2 times | Published

trial judge complied with the pronouncements of Rule 3.170(j) Fla.R.Crim.P. and Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hoover v. State

511 So. 2d 629, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1755

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1987 | Docket: 1338821

Cited 2 times | Published

to a crime she did not commit," the evil which rule 3.170(j) seeks to remedy. [18] Shannon alleged in

Category: Criminal Procedure

Howard v. State

484 So. 2d 1319, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 622

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1986 | Docket: 1343788

Cited 2 times | Published

shall be made in writing under the provisions of Rule 3.170(a); (3) At any pre-trial conference; unless waived

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morgan v. State

471 So. 2d 1336, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1574

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1985 | Docket: 1397309

Cited 2 times | Published

shall be made in writing under the provisions of Rule 3.170(a); "(3) At any pre-trial conference; unless

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hyde v. State

405 So. 2d 445

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1981 | Docket: 2525039

Cited 2 times | Published

court after the required inquiries to Hyde, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.170(j), 3.172, Hyde was free to withdraw his

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hyde v. State

405 So. 2d 445

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1981 | Docket: 2525039

Cited 2 times | Published

court after the required inquiries to Hyde, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.170(j), 3.172, Hyde was free to withdraw his

Category: Criminal Procedure

Florida Bar

343 So. 2d 1247, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 4116

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1977 | Docket: 64557850

Cited 2 times | Published

appropriate to expand the language of former Rule 3.170(j) (deleted) and establish a separate rule. Incorporates

Category: Criminal Procedure

Danforth v. State

316 So. 2d 304

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1975 | Docket: 1456214

Cited 2 times | Published

basis for their guilty pleas, in violation of Rule 3.170(j), RCrP. On this point, we have previously stated

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hall v. State

309 So. 2d 226

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1975 | Docket: 1770723

Cited 2 times | Published

compliance with the "factual basis" requirement of Rule 3.170(j) is mandatory. While the First District in

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

316 So. 2d 303

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1974 | Docket: 1456177

Cited 2 times | Published

the negotiated guilty pleas in accordance with Rule 3.170(j), CrPR. Since appellant has alleged no prejudice

Category: Criminal Procedure

Toth v. State

297 So. 2d 53

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1974 | Docket: 289481

Cited 2 times | Published

remark or instructing the jury to disregard it. Rule 3.170(f) of the Rules of Criminal Procedure provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carroll v. State

266 So. 3d 1270

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2019 | Docket: 64708585

Cited 1 times | Published

pro se motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to Rule 3.170(l ).1 The trial court, relying on Cunningham

Category: Criminal Procedure

ANTONIO JONES v. STATE OF FLORIDA

230 So. 3d 20

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2017 | Docket: 6219446

Cited 1 times | Published

counsel for a motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to Rule 3.170(l). See Mosley v. State, 932 So.2d 1239 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

& SC15-1612 Joshua Lee Altersberger v. State of Florida & Joshua Lee Altersberger v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

216 So. 3d 621

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2017 | Docket: 5813563

Cited 1 times | Published

defendant in a trial of that cause. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f). Under this provision, a trial court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bradley A. Williams v. State

215 So. 3d 642, 2017 WL 1292365, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4781

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2017 | Docket: 4684547

Cited 1 times | Published

interplay between rules 3.170(Z) and 3.850. A timely rule 3.170(£) motion to withdraw plea, as was filed here

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gipson v. State

209 So. 3d 653, 2017 WL 456668, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1286

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 2017 | Docket: 4579991

Cited 1 times | Published

asserting that his pleas were involuntary. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l). The trial court summarily denied the

Category: Criminal Procedure

T.J. v. State

215 So. 3d 71, 2016 WL 5804864, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14843

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2016 | Docket: 60265069

Cited 1 times | Published

State, 943 So.2d 899 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(a); Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.075(a). It would

Category: Criminal Procedure

Flemming v. State

204 So. 3d 950, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14506

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2016 | Docket: 63630695

Cited 1 times | Published

conflict-free counsel and to an evidentiary hearing under Rule 3.170(i), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tillman v. State

180 So. 3d 235, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18972, 2015 WL 9264083

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2015 | Docket: 60252352

Cited 1 times | Published

the underlying order. Fla. R. App. P. 9.020(i). Rule 3.170(Z) requires that the motion to withdraw plea

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wisniewski v. State

177 So. 3d 70, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15173, 2015 WL 5949117

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2015 | Docket: 2919901

Cited 1 times | Published

pro se motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to rule 3.170(i), which contains specific allegations that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Taylor v. State

132 So. 3d 882, 2014 WL 481283, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1670

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2014 | Docket: 60238564

Cited 1 times | Published

to withdraw plea after sentencing pursuant to rule 3.170(0 are narrower than those for a motion filed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Iriarte v. State

119 So. 3d 528, 2013 WL 4265550, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12834

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2013 | Docket: 60233636

Cited 1 times | Published

The trial court erred because a motion under rule 3.170(Z) is not a collateral proceeding. In many ways

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pacheco v. State

114 So. 3d 1107, 2013 WL 2661693, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9427

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2013 | Docket: 60231756

Cited 1 times | Published

his plea shortly after sentencing. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(i). Among his several grounds were allegations

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

113 So. 3d 110, 2013 WL 2113022, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7974

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 2013 | Docket: 60231418

Cited 1 times | Published

JACOBUS and BERGER, JJ., concur. . See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(Z). . Smith was sentenced on February

Category: Criminal Procedure

Watson v. State

111 So. 3d 205, 2013 WL 1136238, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4425

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2013 | Docket: 60230771

Cited 1 times | Published

sentencing, it could have been considered as a rule 3.170(i) motion to withdraw his plea, which would not

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pagan v. State

110 So. 3d 3, 2012 WL 5499990

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2012 | Docket: 60230273

Cited 1 times | Published

conflict-free counsel to assist Pagan with his rule 3.170(7) motion. An evidentiary hearing was scheduled

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hall v. State

72 So. 3d 290, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16514, 2011 WL 4949811

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2011 | Docket: 2357889

Cited 1 times | Published

governs motions to withdraw pleas after sentencing. Rule 3.170(Z) states that: A defendant who pleads guilty

Category: Criminal Procedure

Crane v. State

69 So. 3d 357, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14230, 2011 WL 3962893

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 2011 | Docket: 1908009

Cited 1 times | Published

Crane's sentencing to occur after his trial. Rule 3.170(f) provides that "[t]he court may in its discretion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Escobar v. State

126 So. 3d 277, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10183, 2011 WL 2555711

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2011 | Docket: 60236386

Cited 1 times | Published

pro se motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to rule 3.170(£), which contains specific allegations that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gallegos v. State

62 So. 3d 1236, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8947, 2011 WL 2341397

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2011 | Docket: 2326909

Cited 1 times | Published

the plea was not entered voluntarily. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Camon v. State

57 So. 3d 972, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4332, 2011 WL 1135462

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2011 | Docket: 60299223

Cited 1 times | Published

court noted, “we are here on two motions,” the Rule 3.170(¿) and a Rule 3.850 motion. The court then explained

Category: Criminal Procedure

Puentes v. State

58 So. 3d 912, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3479, 2011 WL 904582

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2011 | Docket: 60299546

Cited 1 times | Published

indictment, and that the sixty day time frame in Rule 3.170(g)(2)(A) did not apply because Puentes had not

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bruce v. State

38 So. 3d 869, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9135, 2010 WL 2507034

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 2010 | Docket: 1658007

Cited 1 times | Published

pro se motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l), which contains specific allegations that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Franklin v. State

31 So. 3d 948, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4677, 2010 WL 1404386

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 2010 | Docket: 2515389

Cited 1 times | Published

October 15, 2009. The motion was untimely under rule 3.170(l), which requires filing within thirty days

Category: Criminal Procedure

Courtemanche v. State

24 So. 3d 770, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20557, 2009 WL 5150066

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2009 | Docket: 1648855

Cited 1 times | Published

3.172(i). Rule 3.170(f) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provides: Rule 3.170. Pleas * * *

Category: Criminal Procedure

Haynes v. State

24 So. 3d 726, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20010, 2009 WL 4928025

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2009 | Docket: 1151705

Cited 1 times | Published

trial court held an evidentiary hearing on the rule 3.170 motion, at which Haynes testified that his counsel

Category: Criminal Procedure

James v. State

12 So. 3d 1290, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10353, 2009 WL 2244195

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 2009 | Docket: 390136

Cited 1 times | Published

1st DCA 2001) (noting that the time limit under rule 3.170(l) is jurisdictional). We also agree with the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Grier v. State

14 So. 3d 252, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9165, 2009 WL 1940754

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 2009 | Docket: 2542225

Cited 1 times | Published

indicates his desire to avail himself of the rule 3.170(l) procedure. Lester v. State, 820 So.2d 1078

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morris v. State

8 So. 3d 504, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5421, 2009 WL 1393402

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2009 | Docket: 1415395

Cited 1 times | Published

sentence, and the order denying the appellant's rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw his plea, but we remand

Category: Criminal Procedure

Council v. State

9 So. 3d 721, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3435, 2009 WL 1066292

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2009 | Docket: 1221878

Cited 1 times | Published

withdrawal did not include coercion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l) (allowing motion to withdraw plea after

Category: Criminal Procedure

SZEREMI v. State

6 So. 3d 122, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3252, 2009 WL 1025878

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2009 | Docket: 308309

Cited 1 times | Published

case become final. See In re Amendments to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170 & 3.172, 953 So.2d 513, 518 (Fla. 2007);

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

7 So. 3d 635, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3180, 2009 WL 996362

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 2009 | Docket: 2572806

Cited 1 times | Published

Noah Smith, pro se, appeals the denial of his rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw his plea as involuntary

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

10 So. 3d 660, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2891, 2009 WL 928480

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2009 | Docket: 1642402

Cited 1 times | Published

70, 72-73 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (holding that a rule 3.170(0 motion to withdraw a plea after sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Guzman v. State

994 So. 2d 1252, 2008 WL 4998763

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 2008 | Docket: 1454427

Cited 1 times | Published

counsel to advise and assist him in preparing a rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw the plea. 959 So.2d 1254

Category: Criminal Procedure

Arzola v. State

994 So. 2d 1209, 2008 WL 4889132

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2008 | Docket: 392821

Cited 1 times | Published

to sentencing should have been granted. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f). Arzola entered a plea conditioned on

Category: Criminal Procedure

Byrd v. State

995 So. 2d 1008, 2008 WL 4682299

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2008 | Docket: 2535107

Cited 1 times | Published

knowingly and voluntarily in accordance with Rule 3.170(k) and with the consent of the prosecutor and

Category: Criminal Procedure

LaBOY v. State

989 So. 2d 702, 2008 WL 3851435

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2008 | Docket: 449948

Cited 1 times | Published

appellee. PER CURIAM. The dismissal of appellant's rule 3.170(l) motion as untimely is affirmed without prejudice

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

981 So. 2d 676, 2008 WL 2150091

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2008 | Docket: 467976

Cited 1 times | Published

"A motion to withdraw plea filed pursuant to rule 3.170 is a critical stage of the proceedings in the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Carruthers v. State

972 So. 2d 1035, 2008 WL 141096

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2008 | Docket: 2559901

Cited 1 times | Published

which were not preserved for appeal by his pro se rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea. This affirmance is

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tuhey v. State

972 So. 2d 1029, 2008 WL 110117

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 2008 | Docket: 2580900

Cited 1 times | Published

we said: "the thirty-day window provided in Rule 3.170(l) is a critical stage of the criminal proceedings

Category: Criminal Procedure

Moraes v. State

967 So. 2d 1100, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18126, 2007 WL 3355066

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2007 | Docket: 64853034

Cited 1 times | Published

considered the motion to withdraw under rule 3.170(Z) and not rule 3.170(f). In a concurring opinion, Justice

Category: Criminal Procedure

Haber v. State

961 So. 2d 1098, 323 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1817

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2007 | Docket: 468755

Cited 1 times | Published

written order disposing of the motion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l); Smallwood v. State, 911 So.2d 849, 850

Category: Criminal Procedure

Perrette v. State

960 So. 2d 888, 2007 WL 2043455

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2007 | Docket: 1726300

Cited 1 times | Published

motion to withdraw was timely filed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l). Second, the filing of the motion suspended

Category: Criminal Procedure

Oosterink v. State

947 So. 2d 663, 2007 WL 188356

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 2007 | Docket: 2555920

Cited 1 times | Published

direct appeal from a motion to withdraw plea under rule 3.170(f). Although the postconviction court is correct

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lopez v. State

940 So. 2d 613, 2006 WL 3103151

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2006 | Docket: 1523874

Cited 1 times | Published

proceedings. Lopez's attorney initially filed a rule 3.170(l) motion claiming that Lopez did not realize

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stokes v. State

938 So. 2d 644, 2006 WL 2871861

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2006 | Docket: 1673670

Cited 1 times | Published

she was affected adversely by medication.[3] Rule 3.170(l) provides for the withdrawal of a plea after

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morris v. State

909 So. 2d 428, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12765, 2005 WL 1991759

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 2005 | Docket: 64840151

Cited 1 times | Published

sufficient cause to support the withdrawal. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f). On appeal, Morris contends his defense

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kelly v. State

907 So. 2d 550, 2005 WL 1459132

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2005 | Docket: 459501

Cited 1 times | Published

(Fla.2005). A motion to withdraw a plea under Rule 3.170(f) also allows the withdrawal of a plea only

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rogers v. State

864 So. 2d 521, 2004 WL 40567

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 2004 | Docket: 1426077

Cited 1 times | Published

thirty days after sentencing. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f) and (l). Rule 3.170(l) states that a defendant may

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hulett v. State

830 So. 2d 243, 2002 WL 31507141

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2002 | Docket: 235325

Cited 1 times | Published

Hulett, acting pro se, failed to *244 realize rule 3.170(f) only applies to motions filed before sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dow v. State

823 So. 2d 830, 2002 WL 1968829

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 2002 | Docket: 1512800

Cited 1 times | Published

was not a 6-year youthful offender sentence. Rule 3.170(l) gave him 30 days to file a motion to withdraw

Category: Criminal Procedure

McManama v. State

816 So. 2d 781, 2002 WL 940168

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2002 | Docket: 1557597

Cited 1 times | Published

to a misdemeanor charge at first appearance. Rule 3.170 further provides that, upon such a plea, the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Barlow v. State

784 So. 2d 482, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3225, 2001 WL 245755

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2001 | Docket: 64805190

Cited 1 times | Published

voluntary plea. The authority for the motion was rule 3.170(ü), which provides: Motion to Withdraw the Plea

Category: Criminal Procedure

Grantham v. State

665 So. 2d 348, 1995 WL 761038

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1995 | Docket: 1351674

Cited 1 times | Published

significance of the plea and its voluntariness." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(k). We have recently noted that "[s]uch a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stinson v. State

448 So. 2d 1240

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1984 | Docket: 429730

Cited 1 times | Published

that the plea was in his best interest. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j), 3.172(d). The record reveals that after

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davenport v. State

317 So. 2d 851

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1975 | Docket: 1419352

Cited 1 times | Published

case is silent as to a previous felony offense. Rule 3.170, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

272 So. 2d 513, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4898

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1973 | Docket: 64530084

Cited 1 times | Published

BOYD, J., concurs as to Rule 3.170; dissents as to Rule 3.140. 3.140. Indictments; Informations. (a)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Derrick L. Mathis, Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2025 | Docket: 70914227

Published

hearing on his motion. See id. at n.9 (“Although rule 3.170(l) does not expressly require a trial court to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodgers v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2025 | Docket: 70690152

Published

open plea, as contemplated by the rule.”); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f) (“The court may in its discretion, and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodgers v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2025 | Docket: 70690155

Published

open plea, as contemplated by the rule.”); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f) (“The court may in its discretion, and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodgers v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2025 | Docket: 70690154

Published

open plea, as contemplated by the rule.”); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f) (“The court may in its discretion, and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Parson v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2025 | Docket: 70690157

Published

alleging that his plea was involuntary. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l), 3.850(a)(5). Without this term in the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ralph Waldo Emerson, IV v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2025 | Docket: 70454061

Published

those post-plea issues by appropriate motion: rule 3.170(l) motion for involuntary pleas, and objection

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ira Toomer v. the State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2025 | Docket: 70000165

Published

when a represented defendant files a pro se rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea based on allegations

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jeremy Tyrone Hickman v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2025 | Docket: 69620090

Published

treated as a motion to withdraw plea. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l). The notice of appeal was filed first

Category: Criminal Procedure

Adrian Gore v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2025 | Docket: 69554643

Published

performance of his plea agreement. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f), (l).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Young v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2024 | Docket: 69485907

Published

2 Florida law states that "[a] rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw a plea is a critical stage

Category: Criminal Procedure

Young v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2024 | Docket: 69485906

Published

2 Florida law states that "[a] rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw a plea is a critical stage

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wallace v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2024 | Docket: 69324004

Published

been by a motion to withdraw the plea. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f). Accordingly, we were correct

Category: Criminal Procedure

Luis Sanchez v. the State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 2024 | Docket: 69171794

Published

rendition re-starting the deadlines contained in Rule 3.170(l). In the second place, according to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Shane Matthew Morrow v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 2024 | Docket: 69151094

Published

[W]hen a represented defendant files a pro se rule 3.170(l) motion based on allegations giving rise

Category: Criminal Procedure

DASMOND BRANNON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2024 | Docket: 68981094

Published

of a plea after sentencing pursuant to rule 3.170(l). Lastly, Defendant appears to seek additional

Category: Criminal Procedure

Timothy B. Hasbrouck v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2024 | Docket: 68869813

Published

judgment of conviction and sentence. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f) (“The court may in its discretion, and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Derrick L. Mathis, Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2024 | Docket: 68838092

Published

before the trial court ruled on the construed Rule 3.170(l) motion—Mathis filed his “Motion to Supplement

Category: Criminal Procedure

Maxwell v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2024 | Docket: 68422842

Published

Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.160 (“Arraignment”); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(a) (identifying three types of pleas regarding

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tyrance Antoine Golfin v. The State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2024 | Docket: 68270031

Published

agreement. The State, though, never filed a rule 3.170(g) motion in the lower proceedings. Regardless

Category: Criminal Procedure

JOSEPH GILLETTE, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2024 | Docket: 65635478

Published

se motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l), which contains specific allegations

Category: Criminal Procedure

AKEEM R. WELCH v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2023 | Docket: 68091952

Published

to withdraw plea after sentencing pursuant to rule 3.170(l). The court summarily denied the motion without

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jeromee Saffold v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2023 | Docket: 68043003

Published

was not entitled to withdraw his plea pursuant rule 3.170(f). Appellant pled guilty to seven counts:

Category: Criminal Procedure

DOMINICK R. WALKER v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2023 | Docket: 63588200

Published

conflict-free counsel to assist him in preparing his rule 3.170(l) motion. We agree. “A motion to withdraw

Category: Criminal Procedure

John Michael Armstrong, Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2022 | Docket: 65346487

Published

Armstrong’s motion is not such a motion. Consider where rule 3.170 appears in the criminal rules in relation to

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Florida Probate Rules, Florida Rules of Traffic Court, Florida Small Claims Rules, and Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 2022 | Docket: 63591315

Published

been made in writing under the provisions of rule 3.170(a); (3) at any pretrial conference

Category: Criminal Procedure

PRINCIPE HORMAECHE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2022 | Docket: 63572504

Published

his or her plea prior to sentencing. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f) (“The court may in its discretion, and

Category: Criminal Procedure

DERRICK V. HOSKIN v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2022 | Docket: 63385751

Published

one seeking to withdraw the plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l), which provides: A defendant who pleads

Category: Criminal Procedure

LOUIS MASIELLO, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2022 | Docket: 63352048

Published

a represented defendant files a pro se rule 3.170(l) motion based on allegations giving rise

Category: Criminal Procedure

GIOVANI GUERRA v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 2022 | Docket: 62218239

Published

trial court denied Appellant’s post- sentencing rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw his plea of guilty to four

Category: Criminal Procedure

JEFFREY RAY SUNDWALL v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 2021 | Docket: 61574102

Published

Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l) (“A defendant who pleads guilty or nolo

Category: Criminal Procedure

ACE WEINTRAUB v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2021 | Docket: 60695057

Published

withdraw his plea as involuntary, pursuant to rule 3.170(l). This motion was denied, and the trial court’s

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stanley Tyron Harris v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2021 | Docket: 60414524

Published

plea before sentencing” (emphasis in original)). Rule 3.170 provides as follows: The court may in its

Category: Criminal Procedure

FREDERICK L. COLE, III v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2021 | Docket: 60108403

Published

untimely. A motion to withdraw plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l) is narrowly limited in both time and scope:

Category: Criminal Procedure

State of Florida v. Vernson Edward Dortch

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2021 | Docket: 59921668

Published

” Id. We said that we were adopting the new rule 3.170(l) “[c]onsistent with the legislature’s philosophy

Category: Criminal Procedure

DARRELL T. SMITH JR. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2021 | Docket: 59241560

Published

motion as successive following denial of a prior rule 3.170(l) motion).

Category: Criminal Procedure

DARRELL T. SMITH JR. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2021 | Docket: 59241560

Published

motion as successive following denial of a prior rule 3.170(l) motion).

Category: Criminal Procedure

JERMAINE CLARINGTON v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 2020 | Docket: 18707239

Published

made in writing under the provisions of rule 3.170(a); (3) at any pretrial conference, unless

Category: Criminal Procedure

Anton Tuomi v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 13, 2020 | Docket: 18630131

Published

would not have been 1 Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l) provides that “[a] defendant who pleads

Category: Criminal Procedure

Isiah Johnson v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2020 | Docket: 18458088

Published

trial court. We disagree and affirm. 2 A rule 3.170(l) motion must be filed “within thirty days after

Category: Criminal Procedure

BRIAN M. CHIPMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2019 | Docket: 16543996

Published

sentence, on February 26, 2018, Chipman filed a rule 3.170(l) motion alleging that his plea was involuntarily

Category: Criminal Procedure

DEBRA L. ANGELES v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2019 | Docket: 16223265

Published

present proper bases to challenge the plea under rule 3.170(l). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Travis R. Brown v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2019 | Docket: 16095932

Published

someone that he had deleted the 2 See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)a

Category: Criminal Procedure

CLAY ROBINSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 2019 | Docket: 16055472

Published

578 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). While Robinson’s Rule 3.170(l) motion was pending in the circuit court, this

Category: Criminal Procedure

RUSSELL M. CUCIAK v. STATE OF FLORIDA

273 So. 3d 54

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2019 | Docket: 15731301

Published

recognizes “the thirty-day window provided in rule 3.170(l) is a critical stage of the criminal proceedings”

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jonathan Mark Vito v. State of Florida

270 So. 3d 1287

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2019 | Docket: 15651838

Published

preserved by a motion to withdraw plea. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)c

Category: Criminal Procedure

ERIS BERMUDEZGOMEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2019 | Docket: 14988959

Published

to withdraw plea after sentencing. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l). We reverse and remand with directions

Category: Criminal Procedure

DONALD JAMES CULVER v. STATE OF FLORIDA

264 So. 3d 1101

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2019 | Docket: 14554435

Published

Sheppard, 17 So. 3d 275. We agree. Rule 3.170(l) provides: "A defendant who pleads guilty

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sam Casseus v. State of Florida

269 So. 3d 580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2019 | Docket: 14533667

Published

419, 421 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Khalil Flozel Taylor v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2019 | Docket: 8480912

Published

a timely-filed motion to withdraw plea under rule 3.170(l) is pending and a notice of appeal is filed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Parks v. State

257 So. 3d 1234

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2018 | Docket: 64691450

Published

4th DCA 2000) (affirming denial of untimely rule 3.170(l ) motion without prejudice to the appellant's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bernard Parks v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2018 | Docket: 8343187

Published

4th DCA 2000) (affirming denial of untimely rule 3.170(l) motion without prejudice to the appellant’s

Category: Criminal Procedure

Joseph Wayne Smith v. State of Florida

249 So. 3d 1284

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2018 | Docket: 7254062

Published

A motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l) is a critical stage in the direct criminal

Category: Criminal Procedure

MARCUS STRONG v. STATE OF FLORIDA

254 So. 3d 428

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2018 | Docket: 7225323

Published

the court erred in failing to treat it as a Rule 3.170(l) motion. See Applegate v. State, 23 So. 3d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Goodman v. State

243 So. 3d 530

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2018 | Docket: 64678650

Published

(agreeing that a trial court may strike pro se rule 3.170(l ) motion as a nullity unless the motion "contains

Category: Criminal Procedure

Larry C. Goodman v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2018 | Docket: 6915075

Published

(agreeing that a trial court may strike pro se rule 3.170(l) motion as a nullity unless the motion “contains

Category: Criminal Procedure

Benjamin v. State

230 So. 3d 953

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2017 | Docket: 6232645

Published

to withdraw a plea before sentencing under [rule] 3.170(f), the trial court must either deny the motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Molina v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2017 | Docket: 6219530

Published

prior to the imposition of sentence, see Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(a); Hardwick v. State, 630 So. 2d 1212

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jerald Anthony Tubbs v. State of Florida

229 So. 3d 1256

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2017 | Docket: 6219401

Published

Thus, pleas have been found involuntary under rule 3.170(l) when the trial judge indicates that a harsher

Category: Criminal Procedure

Curran F. Lane v. State

225 So. 3d 345, 2017 WL 3318004, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11281

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2017 | Docket: 6136507

Published

evidentiary hearing where she stated colorable claim in rule 3.170(£) motion that her plea was not voluntarily,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brosnan P. Hart v. State

213 So. 3d 1114, 2017 WL 1102943, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3900

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2017 | Docket: 4667186

Published

Appellant argues and the State concedes that a rule 3.170 motion to withdraw plea is a critical stage of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2017 | Docket: 4620356

Published

So. 2d 645, 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (“Although rule 3.170(l) does not expressly require a trial court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Watson v. State

213 So. 3d 917, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 495

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2017 | Docket: 60263945

Published

court observed that prior to the creation of rule 3.170(g), “[t]he State’s ability to have a breached

Category: Criminal Procedure

T.J. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2016 | Docket: 4469190

Published

State, 943 So. 2d 899 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170 (a); Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.075(a). It would

Category: Criminal Procedure

Callaway v. State

202 So. 3d 901, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14505

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2016 | Docket: 4426701

Published

first felony conviction. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(a); see also Hardwick v. State,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bland v. State

210 So. 3d 106, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13526

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 2016 | Docket: 4422984

Published

withdraw plea after sentencing. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(Z). Because the motion was facially sufficient

Category: Criminal Procedure

2D15-1642 / Sanders v. State

210 So. 3d 98, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13367

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2016 | Docket: 4422988

Published

to consider the amended motion untimely. Rule 3.170(í) provides as follows: A defendant who

Category: Criminal Procedure

Spears v. State

210 So. 3d 87, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12897

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2016 | Docket: 4416606

Published

that “the law favors a trial on the merits,” and rule 3.170(f) should thus be “liberally construed” in favor

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bryan Gordon v. State of Florida

192 So. 3d 579, 2016 WL 2906730, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7645

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 2016 | Docket: 3071423

Published

motion to mitigate his sentence rather than a rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw his plea. Appellant alleged

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Philip Kogan

190 So. 3d 268, 2016 WL 2760113, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7304

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 2016 | Docket: 3065878

Published

his probation. On July 31, 2015, Kogan filed a rule 3.170(J) motion to withdraw his plea, alleging that

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hughbanks v. State

190 So. 3d 1122, 2016 WL 1718847, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6530

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 2016 | Docket: 60254750

Published

subsequently moved to withdraw the plea, pursuant to rule 3.170(Z), in order to file a motion to dismiss and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gray v. State

198 So. 3d 780, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3374, 2016 WL 833507

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2016 | Docket: 3041728

Published

THE TRIAL COURT TO RESOLVE MOTIONS UNDER FLA. R. CRIM. P. 3.170(0 ALTENBERND, Judge. Weston Gray

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jamison v. State

186 So. 3d 37, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2170, 2016 WL 618886

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2016 | Docket: 3036702

Published

of his rendered sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(Z). The trial court will also need to address

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ernest Archie v. State of Florida

176 So. 3d 364

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2015 | Docket: 2991550

Published

to avail himself of the procedure provided by rule 3.170(Z) and filed a pro se motion to withdraw his

Category: Criminal Procedure

Starks v. State

174 So. 3d 1079, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13538, 2015 WL 5279034

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 2015 | Docket: 60250265

Published

defendant files a motion to withdraw plea under rule 3.170(0, but the time to file such a motion has passed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Castro v. State

201 So. 3d 77, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13062

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 2015 | Docket: 2690037

Published

well within the thirty day window prescribed by rule 3.170(i). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal and remand

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gianni Passino v. State of Florida

174 So. 3d 1055, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13080, 2015 WL 5131633

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 2015 | Docket: 2690047

Published

(Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (affirming denial of pro se rule 3.170(£) motion; motion was a nullity since it was

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mitchell E. Fox v. State of Florida

166 So. 3d 894, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8479, 2015 WL 3486645

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 2015 | Docket: 2679287

Published

the trial court erred by summarily denying his Rule 3.170(Z) motion without appointing conflict-free counsel

Category: Criminal Procedure

Robert Earl Hypes v. State of Florida

163 So. 3d 745

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2015 | Docket: 2654151

Published

the guilty plea on erroneous legal advice. Rule 3.170(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kevin Bell v. State

189 So. 3d 804, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3475, 2015 WL 1046268

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 2015 | Docket: 2640571

Published

dismiss the motion as premature and to rule on the rule 3.170(Z) motion to withdraw plea. Wilson v. State

Category: Criminal Procedure

Davis v. State

154 So. 3d 1203, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 399, 2015 WL 160724

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 2015 | Docket: 2624300

Published

was styled as a motion to withdraw plea under rule 3.170(Z), and while the postconviction court correctly

Category: Criminal Procedure

Shores v. State

152 So. 3d 93, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19076, 2014 WL 6489203

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2014 | Docket: 60245140

Published

the defendant in a trial of that cause. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f). Shores is correct that the rule does

Category: Criminal Procedure

Galarza v. State

150 So. 3d 1209, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18560, 2014 WL 5901860

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2014 | Docket: 2597994

Published

State, 17 So.3d 275 (Fla. 2009) (applying rule 3.170(0 to a motion to withdraw the defendant’s admission

Category: Criminal Procedure

James H. Tipler v. State of Florida

149 So. 3d 1192

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2014 | Docket: 2592195

Published

file a motion to withdraw the plea. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(Z). Florida law recognizes that a 3.170(Z)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Staples v. State

161 So. 3d 561, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17287, 2014 WL 5853778

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2014 | Docket: 60247205

Published

PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur. . See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(1). . See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(a)(5);

Category: Criminal Procedure

Damanta Jamar Murphy v. State of Florida

149 So. 3d 1163

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2014 | Docket: 1421760

Published

was legally dispositive as contemplated under rule 3.170(£), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and rule

Category: Criminal Procedure

Liston T. Gumbs, Jr. v. State

143 So. 3d 1160, 2014 WL 3928491, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12424

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2014 | Docket: 936950

Published

life sentence if convicted is cognizable under rule 3.170(i).”). Second, we conclude that the defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smalls v. State

144 So. 3d 656, 2014 WL 3882930, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12211

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2014 | Docket: 836854

Published

1 . See, e.g., Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f), (/).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hodge v. State

147 So. 3d 1029, 2014 WL 3843984, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11986

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2014 | Docket: 839414

Published

in that case. Hence, the legal requirements of rule 3.170(k) were clearly not fulfilled, and the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Starling v. State

137 So. 3d 568, 2014 WL 1652533, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6085

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2014 | Docket: 60240373

Published

erroneously treated the motion as filed under rule 3.170(1) and denied the motion as untimely because

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pierre v. State

155 So. 3d 1153, 2014 WL 1612667, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5738

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2014 | Docket: 60245575

Published

conflict-free counsel to represent the appellant on his rule 3.170(1) motion. See Sheppard v. State, 17 So.3d 275

Category: Criminal Procedure

Garcia v. State

137 So. 3d 442, 2014 WL 940726, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3454

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2014 | Docket: 60240311

Published

was not preserved for direct appeal.1 See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(0. In Clemons v. State, 111 So.2d 1169

Category: Criminal Procedure

Shaw v. State

133 So. 3d 644, 2014 WL 982557, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3499

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2014 | Docket: 60238863

Published

finding that the motions were untimely filed under rule 3.170(l) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments To The Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and The Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 2014 | Docket: 401593

Published

the postconviction rules and the deletion of rule 3.170(l). As explained in the joint petition, the proposed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

128 So. 3d 964, 2013 WL 6977960, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20510

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2013 | Docket: 60237244

Published

noncompliance with the plea agreement. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(g)(2)(A) (providing that the State may move

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hummel v. State

128 So. 3d 127, 2013 WL 5729822, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16768

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2013 | Docket: 60236978

Published

agreement before the plea was accepted. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(g)(1) (“Whenever a plea agreement requires

Category: Criminal Procedure

Garcia v. State

128 So. 3d 115, 2013 WL 5493434, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15625

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2013 | Docket: 60236955

Published

days after rendition of the sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(0- As explained in Gafford v. State, 783

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rivera v. State

136 So. 3d 609, 2013 WL 5225383, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14809

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 2013 | Docket: 60240037

Published

“Because the law favors a trial on the merits, [rule 3.170(f) ] should be liberally construed in favor of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tennis v. State

125 So. 3d 294, 2013 WL 4821202, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14456

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 2013 | Docket: 60235824

Published

life sentence. Tennis previously moved under rule 3.170(Z) to withdraw his agreement as involuntary.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Anderson v. State

116 So. 3d 614, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10297, 2013 WL 3238232

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 2013 | Docket: 60232413

Published

after the rendition of his sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170. As explained in Gafford v. State, 783 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Baker v. State

115 So. 3d 1081, 2013 WL 3099940, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9803

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2013 | Docket: 60232084

Published

fully adjudicated in its order denying Baker’s rule 3.170 motion. The court concluded that Baker’s proper

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rabess v. State

115 So. 3d 1079, 2013 WL 3014132, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9619

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 2013 | Docket: 60232082

Published

sentencing and remand for further proceedings. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(0- Appellant contends that his lawyer failed

Category: Criminal Procedure

O'Berry v. State

114 So. 3d 1110, 2013 WL 2661734, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9426

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2013 | Docket: 60231758

Published

DISCUSSION Mr. O’Berry filed his motion under rule 3.170(i), which provides, “A defendant who pleads guilty

Category: Criminal Procedure

Feazell v. State

115 So. 3d 1045, 2013 WL 2420394, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8886

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2013 | Docket: 60232060

Published

post-sentencing in this case was untimely filed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l) (motion must be filed within thirty days

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure & the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

112 So. 3d 1234, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 247, 2013 WL 1666737, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 710

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2013 | Docket: 60230994

Published

the postconviction rules and the deletion of rule 3.170(1). As explained in the joint petition, the proposed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Curtis v. State

106 So. 3d 56, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1543, 2013 WL 380068

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2013 | Docket: 60228404

Published

proceedings. A motion to withdraw plea under rule 3.170(0 must be filed within thirty days after rendition

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

104 So. 3d 304, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 678, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2667, 2012 WL 5439265

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2012 | Docket: 60227454

Published

addition, the Committee proposes deletion of rule 3.170(l) (Pleas — Motion to Withdraw the Plea after

Category: Criminal Procedure

Balzer v. State

100 So. 3d 173, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18276, 2012 WL 5076103

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2012 | Docket: 60225662

Published

appeal as premature. At the time Balzer filed his rule 3.170(() motion, he was still represented by his trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hughen v. State

96 So. 3d 1114, 2012 WL 3870848, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14981

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2012 | Docket: 60311439

Published

“Because the law favors a trial on the merits, [rule 3.170(f) ] should be liberally construed in favor of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kessell v. State

96 So. 3d 1031, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14015, 2012 WL 3586590

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2012 | Docket: 60311379

Published

in prison. He moved to withdraw his plea under rule 3.170(i), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, raising

Category: Criminal Procedure

Landell v. State

88 So. 3d 413, 2012 WL 1697058, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7834

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2012 | Docket: 60308283

Published

motion was premature because it was filed while a Rule 3.170(1) motion to vacate plea was pending and before

Category: Criminal Procedure

Campbell v. State

75 So. 3d 757, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17207, 2011 WL 5105638

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2011 | Docket: 60303927

Published

the operation of pleas, and noted that while rule 3.170 contains a time limitation and 3.172 does not

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lovett v. State

64 So. 3d 744, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10163, 2011 WL 2556912

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2011 | Docket: 2362390

Published

follow when an indigent defendant files a pro se rule 3.170(l) motion alleging an adversarial *746 relationship

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bir v. State

60 So. 3d 422, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2958, 2011 WL 714244

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2011 | Docket: 60300207

Published

So.2d 679 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (oral denial of rule 3.170(f) motion reviewable in the appeal from judgment

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

125 So. 3d 165, 2011 WL 182128, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 225

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2011 | Docket: 60235757

Published

6 So.3d 653, 655 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (“Under rule 3.170(f), the trial court may, in its discretion, and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thompson v. State

50 So. 3d 1208, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19827, 2010 WL 5345841

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 2010 | Docket: 60297266

Published

rendered on a motion to withdraw a plea filed under rule 3.170(0 does not waive or abandon the motion. [See]

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rivas v. State

43 So. 3d 154, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12732, 2010 WL 3419813

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2010 | Docket: 60295421

Published

rather than the “substantial noncompliance.” Rule 3.170(g)(2)(C) mandates that “[n]o plea or sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Winchester v. State

36 So. 3d 918, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8196, 2010 WL 2292226

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2010 | Docket: 2581805

Published

motion for rehearing as to the denial of his rule 3.170(l) motion to vacate plea, and denying it. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hummel v. State

34 So. 3d 788, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6937, 2010 WL 1979255

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2010 | Docket: 2557264

Published

agreement before the plea was accepted. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(g)(1) ("Whenever a plea agreement requires

Category: Criminal Procedure

Toler v. State

35 So. 3d 108, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6751, 2010 WL 1930138

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 2010 | Docket: 1770147

Published

hearing on a pro se motion filed pursuant to rule 3.170(l) when the motion *109 gives rise to the suggestion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sanchez v. State

33 So. 3d 753, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5230, 2010 WL 1542635

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2010 | Docket: 1153759

Published

Procedure 3.170(f). When considering a motion under rule 3.170(f), the trial court is required to allow the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rondon v. State

30 So. 3d 596, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2536, 2010 WL 711708

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 2010 | Docket: 122866

Published

withdraw his plea was untimely filed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f) and (l). We therefore deny Rondon's motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sayles v. State

14 So. 3d 1269, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9355, 2009 WL 1940758

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 2009 | Docket: 1650659

Published

Sayles filed—through his defense counsel—a timely rule 3.170(l) motion, alleging that he was advised [by counsel]

Category: Criminal Procedure

Moreland v. State

10 So. 3d 184, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2898, 2009 WL 928758

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2009 | Docket: 761094

Published

939 So.2d 1196, 1196 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ("A rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea filed by a criminal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fierro v. State

10 So. 3d 149, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2514, 2009 WL 763484

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 2009 | Docket: 1132811

Published

alleged error in this case, either by motion under Rule 3.170(l) or by objection, foreclose her from raising

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

994 So. 2d 1254, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 18018, 2008 WL 4999265

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 2008 | Docket: 64856863

Published

indicates his desire to avail himself of the rule 3.170(i) procedure, the trial court must appoint conflict-free

Category: Criminal Procedure

CAMON v. State

994 So. 2d 491, 2008 WL 4862519

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2008 | Docket: 389796

Published

did not appeal. Camon later filed an "amended" rule 3.170(l) motion to withdraw his pleas, a motion to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Garren v. State

976 So. 2d 1159, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 3647, 2008 WL 678654

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2008 | Docket: 64854176

Published

a better plea deal with the prosecutor. Under rule 3.170(f), the trial court may, in its discretion, and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ellis v. State

975 So. 2d 1192, 2008 WL 595937

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2008 | Docket: 1119693

Published

motion to withdraw plea as successive to the rule 3.170(l) motion. The judgments and sentences and denial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ellis v. State

975 So. 2d 1192, 2008 WL 595937

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2008 | Docket: 1119693

Published

motion to withdraw plea as successive to the rule 3.170(l) motion. The judgments and sentences and denial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

969 So. 2d 1144, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18171, 2007 WL 3390929

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2007 | Docket: 64853315

Published

Procedure 3.170(l) and denied the motion as untimely. Rule 3.170(l) permits a defendant who pleaded guilty or

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

969 So. 2d 1142, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18124, 2007 WL 3355383

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2007 | Docket: 64853311

Published

CURIAM. Williams appeals an order denying his rule 3.170(£) motion to withdraw his plea which he alleged

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

959 So. 2d 250, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 389, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 1103, 2007 WL 1774440

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2007 | Docket: 64851248

Published

on what conditions, to grant pretrial release. Rule 3.170 (Pleas) is amended to permit a defendant who

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.170 & 3.172

953 So. 2d 513, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 116, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 558, 2007 WL 924070

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2007 | Docket: 64850055

Published

Court in Amendments II added subdivision (2) to rule 3.170(k), Responsibility of Court on Pleas, to provide

Category: Criminal Procedure

Said v. State

948 So. 2d 919, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1801, 2007 WL 465592

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2007 | Docket: 64849142

Published

State, 688 So.2d 1016 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(g). We also reverse the sentence for direct

Category: Criminal Procedure

Knauff v. State

941 So. 2d 1242, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19283, 2006 WL 3327855

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 2006 | Docket: 64847824

Published

expressly required under Florida law. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(h), 3.172. The plea in this case was taken

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.170 & 3.172

938 So. 2d 978, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2208, 2006 WL 2690141

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2006 | Docket: 64847113

Published

court. PARIENTE and QUINCE, JJ., concur. APPENDIX RULE 3.170. PLEAS (a) Types of Plea; Court’s Discretion

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cunningham v. State

937 So. 2d 1150, 2006 WL 2483080

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2006 | Docket: 1513104

Published

2002). A motion to withdraw plea pursuant to rule 3.170(l) is a critical stage of the proceedings at

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

935 So. 2d 1288, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14257, 2006 WL 2448560

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2006 | Docket: 64846194

Published

Williams, pro se, appeals the order denying his rule 3.170(Z) motion to withdraw the plea he entered in

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lightbourne v. State

920 So. 2d 776, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1835, 2006 WL 335653

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2006 | Docket: 64842368

Published

we deny his petition for belated appeal. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(i); Fla. RApp. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A). We do

Category: Criminal Procedure

Garcia v. State

915 So. 2d 779, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19716, 2005 WL 3408028

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2005 | Docket: 64841091

Published

withdraw plea, which was a motion filed pursuant to rule 3.170(l). The State conceded the error, and we reversed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Collucci v. State

903 So. 2d 333, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8877, 2005 WL 1364380

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2005 | Docket: 64838802

Published

has not been formally accepted by the court.1 Rule 3.170(f) provides the court with discretion to deny

Category: Criminal Procedure

Becker v. State

895 So. 2d 440, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 262, 2005 WL 280344

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2005 | Docket: 64836427

Published

this motion is deemed to be filed pursuant to rule 3.170(0, it was improper because it was not filed by

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bettis v. State

912 So. 2d 585, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18328, 2004 WL 3033258

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 2004 | Docket: 64840626

Published

to withdraw plea after sentencing pursuant to rule 3.170(i), arguing that the trial court’s sentence was

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

885 So. 2d 449, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15675, 2004 WL 2375612

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2004 | Docket: 64833720

Published

1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969)); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(k) (“No plea of guilty or nolo contendere

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bullock v. State

879 So. 2d 645, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8878, 2004 WL 1401388

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 2004 | Docket: 64832132

Published

his motion to withdraw plea filed pursuant to Rule 3.170(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lee v. State

875 So. 2d 765, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8549, 2004 WL 1359001

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2004 | Docket: 64831129

Published

postsentence “manifest injustice” standard of rule 3.170(i). See Iaconetti v. State, 869 So.2d 695, 699

Category: Criminal Procedure

Quinones v. State

871 So. 2d 1044, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6437, 2004 WL 1057793

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2004 | Docket: 64830138

Published

did not file a motion to withdraw pursuant to rule 3.170(1)). PETITION FOR BELATED APPEAL DENIED. PLEUS

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dayton v. State

867 So. 2d 647, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3507, 2004 WL 534039

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2004 | Docket: 64828694

Published

days after rendition of the sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l). As explained in Gafford v. State, 783

Category: Criminal Procedure

Foeley v. State

869 So. 2d 26, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2372, 2004 WL 359978

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 2004 | Docket: 64829102

Published

affirmed the order denying *27Foeley’s earlier rule 3.170(i) motion without prejudice to his filing a facially

Category: Criminal Procedure

Murphy v. State

868 So. 2d 585, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2287, 2004 WL 351779

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 2004 | Docket: 64828973

Published

to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170. Rule 3.170(i) allows a defendant to challenge the entry

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pope v. State

857 So. 2d 271, 2003 WL 22103445

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2003 | Docket: 64825869

Published

mentioned in the rule. Despite the language in rule 3.170(f), we conclude that Mr. Pope was authorized

Category: Criminal Procedure

C.B. v. B.C.

851 So. 2d 847, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11787, 2003 WL 21820744

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2003 | Docket: 64824281

Published

taking a plea, ascertain its factual basis. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(k). Accordingly, we vacate the appealed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ford v. State

850 So. 2d 605, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10221, 2003 WL 21537408

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2003 | Docket: 64824108

Published

that the motion is facially insufficient. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(1); 9.140(b)(2)(A); Harris v. State, 818

Category: Criminal Procedure

Glispy v. State

846 So. 2d 1262, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8787, 2003 WL 21347178

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 2003 | Docket: 64823304

Published

should have been allowed to withdraw his plea. Rule 3.170(f) provides: “Withdrawal of Plea of Guilty. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Spain v. State

849 So. 2d 340, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 5408, 2003 WL 1876892

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2003 | Docket: 64823932

Published

not a part of Spain’s plea agreement. Moreover, rule 3.170(g) contemplates that the defendant’s plea, as

Category: Criminal Procedure

Forsythe v. State

840 So. 2d 440, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3792, 2003 WL 1386704

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2003 | Docket: 64821357

Published

269 (Fla.1999). Pleas are governed generally by Rule 3.170, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Subsection

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bullard v. State

837 So. 2d 1125, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1835, 2003 WL 355248

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2003 | Docket: 64820876

Published

filed a motion to withdraw his plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(i). The motion contained a factually-based

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

837 So. 2d 924, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1011, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 2580, 2002 WL 31718857

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2002 | Docket: 64820841

Published

has been found guilty or pled nolo contendere. Rule 3.170, Pleas, is amended to change the reference to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tennant v. State

827 So. 2d 321, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13218, 2002 WL 31039407

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2002 | Docket: 64817881

Published

filed within 30 days after sentencing. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(Z) (effective January 1, 1997).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Neloms v. State

814 So. 2d 1165, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4963, 2002 WL 561686

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2002 | Docket: 64814671

Published

appellant never moved to withdraw his plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f) (stating a court may permit withdrawal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

804 So. 2d 445, 2001 WL 1327152

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2001 | Docket: 1334095

Published

appeals. We affirm. To show good cause under Rule 3.170(f) or grounds for relief under Rule 3.850, Mr

Category: Criminal Procedure

Peacock v. State

784 So. 2d 1267, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7442, 2001 WL 567629

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 2001 | Docket: 64805352

Published

untimely filed and is procedurally deficient. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(1) & 3.850(b). AFFIRMED. DAVIS, PADOVANO

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Turnquest

782 So. 2d 993, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5154, 2001 WL 388015

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2001 | Docket: 64804883

Published

accepted by the court where the state consents. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(h). State v. Warner, 721 So.2d 767 (Fla.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gregory Hardy v. Sec. for the Dept. of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 4, 2001 | Docket: 212636

Published

appeal, Hardy filed a motion pursuant to Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(f) to withdraw his plea. Upon Hardy’s

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gregory Hardy v. Sec. for the Dept. of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 4, 2001 | Docket: 212637

Published

appeal, Hardy filed a motion pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f) to withdraw his plea. Upon Hardy's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gregory Hardy v. Sec. for the Dept. of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 4, 2001 | Docket: 212637

Published

appeal, Hardy filed a motion pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(f) to withdraw his plea. Upon Hardy's

Category: Criminal Procedure

Forrest v. State

773 So. 2d 1292, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 61, 2001 WL 9838

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2001 | Docket: 64802625

Published

order to contest the involuntariness of his plea, Rule 3.170, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and Rule

Category: Criminal Procedure

Turner v. State

772 So. 2d 610, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16140, 2000 WL 1807404

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2000 | Docket: 64802090

Published

motion to withdraw his plea is reversed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(0; Fla. R.App. P. 2.090(h). We remand for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rackley v. State

755 So. 2d 833, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5200, 2000 WL 553959

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 2000 | Docket: 64796803

Published

1998); see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(Z). Unfortunately for the appellant, he

Category: Criminal Procedure

Shield v. State

744 So. 2d 564, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14801, 1999 WL 1004623

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1999 | Docket: 64792087

Published

defendant’s withdrawal of a guilty plea is governed by rule 3.170(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. As this

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gloss v. State

739 So. 2d 729, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12108, 1999 WL 729090

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1999 | Docket: 64790326

Published

file a motion to withdraw his plea. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.170(f). As a result, his claim of sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Vesquez

755 So. 2d 674, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8694, 1999 WL 436799

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1999 | Docket: 64796724

Published

cited to the identically worded predecessor of Rule 3.170(h), and held that where the state attorney “expressly

Category: Criminal Procedure

Holmes v. State

728 So. 2d 1214, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3448, 1999 WL 155966

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1999 | Docket: 64787048

Published

30 days of the rendition of the sentence, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(1), it being recalled that the original sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Shillingford

731 So. 2d 57, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3410, 1999 WL 156065

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1999 | Docket: 64787801

Published

basis only upon entry of the plea. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(k). Furthermore, as the court pointed out

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hunt v. State

728 So. 2d 338, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2518, 1999 WL 123647

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1999 | Docket: 64786814

Published

denying a motion to withdraw plea pursuant to rule 3.170(i), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomason v. State

732 So. 2d 1122, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1766, 1999 WL 89299

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1999 | Docket: 64788291

Published

of guilty to be withdrawn ...” Fla. R.Crim.P. Rule 3.170(f). The burden is upon a defendant to establish

Category: Criminal Procedure

Willis v. State

715 So. 2d 1177, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11001, 1998 WL 542812

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1998 | Docket: 64782211

Published

1998); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(iii); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(l) COBB, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur

Category: Criminal Procedure

James v. State

696 So. 2d 1194, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5385, 1997 WL 253038

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1997 | Docket: 64775019

Published

The discretion vested in trial courts under rule 3.170(f) to allow a criminal defendant to withdraw

Category: Criminal Procedure

Adler v. State

666 So. 2d 998, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 257, 1996 WL 16560

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 1996 | Docket: 64761717

Published

Criminal Procedure 3.170(f), in part, provides RULE 3.170 PLEAS * * * * * * (f) Withdrawal of Plea of Guilty

Category: Criminal Procedure

Figueroa v. State

657 So. 2d 1225, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7095, 1995 WL 385665

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1995 | Docket: 64757849

Published

intelligent. Sirmons, 620 So.2d at 1249; Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.170(j). Therefore, appellant’s subsequent motions

Category: Criminal Procedure

Slattery v. State

654 So. 2d 286, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4659, 1995 WL 253966

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1995 | Docket: 64755903

Published

procedures by which to withdraw guilty plea are Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.170(f), which “must be invoked prior to sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Leone v. State

643 So. 2d 1198, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10115, 1994 WL 576111

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1994 | Docket: 64751516

Published

of not guilty is made under the provisions of rule 3.170(a)) and at the pronouncement of judgment and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.170 & 3.700

633 So. 2d 1056, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 126, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 354, 1994 WL 70436

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1994 | Docket: 64747006

Published

Committee. The Committee’s proposed amendment to rule 3.170(g) is in accord with our decision in McCoy. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hightower v. State

622 So. 2d 176, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8425, 1993 WL 309036

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1993 | Docket: 64698066

Published

nolo contendere plea. This is not true. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j); Koenig v. State, 597 So.2d 256 (Fla.1992)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas v. Singletary

611 So. 2d 1343, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 163, 1993 WL 5059

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1993 | Docket: 64693401

Published

section 810.02(3), a second degree felony. See Rule 3.170(g), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which

Category: Criminal Procedure

Black v. State

599 So. 2d 1380, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5811, 1992 WL 109633

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1992 | Docket: 64667873

Published

the panel decided not to reach on this appeal. Rule 3.170(j), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lines v. State

594 So. 2d 322, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1352, 1992 WL 25801

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1992 | Docket: 64665486

Published

indication that he did not understand the proceedings. Rule 3.170(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lundgren v. State

581 So. 2d 206, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5092, 1991 WL 90968

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1991 | Docket: 64659470

Published

his counsel. Defense counsel argued that under rule 3.170(f), the court was required to allow withdrawal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bolen v. State

578 So. 2d 61, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3648, 1991 WL 60855

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1991 | Docket: 64658087

Published

State, 513 So.2d 204 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.170(f). HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and STONE

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fields v. State

575 So. 2d 1377, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2193, 1991 WL 32994

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1991 | Docket: 64657068

Published

DCA 1981); § 924.06(3), Fla.Stat. (1989); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170. Fields also argues that, when he pled no

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Ward

574 So. 2d 324, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1314, 1991 WL 18257

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1991 | Docket: 64656370

Published

of Cox v. State, 412 So.2d 354 (Fla.1982) and Rule 3.170(g), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

571 So. 2d 125, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9949, 1990 WL 212152

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1990 | Docket: 64654999

Published

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f). ERVIN, WIGGINTON and MINER, JJ., concur.

Category: Criminal Procedure

DuQuesne v. State

566 So. 2d 522, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3163, 1990 WL 58282

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1990 | Docket: 64652876

Published

appropriate plea colloquy requirements. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.170©, 3.172(c), 3.850. The excerpt of the plea

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

550 So. 2d 174, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2475, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5898, 1989 WL 124604

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1989 | Docket: 64645513

Published

without affording him an eviden-tiary hearing. See Rule 3.170(f), Fla.R. Crim.P. The motion, made pro se1 prior

Category: Criminal Procedure

Heaton v. State

543 So. 2d 290, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1030, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2267, 1989 WL 39571

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1989 | Docket: 64642543

Published

withdraw his plea and proceed to trial. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f); Noon v. State, 480 So.2d 668 (Fla. 4th

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Phillips

520 So. 2d 609, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1035, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11889, 1987 WL 42966

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1987 | Docket: 64632874

Published

it were, to the county court charges. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(a). It is well settled that any material

Category: Criminal Procedure

Graham v. State

514 So. 2d 417, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2478, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10746

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1987 | Docket: 64630456

Published

sufficient to meet the good cause requirement of rule 3.170, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, for withdrawing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Danford v. State

492 So. 2d 690, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8621, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1471

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1986 | Docket: 64621004

Published

appellant stood mute. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 3.170(c) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Mitchell

486 So. 2d 63, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 835, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7181

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1986 | Docket: 64618424

Published

jurisdiction, jeopardy had not attached. Although rule 3.170(g) refers specifically to a guilty plea to a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rodriguez v. State

468 So. 2d 312, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 887, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13308

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1985 | Docket: 64611733

Published

not advising appellant of his rights under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170. We affirm. In March 1980 various members

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bloomburg v. State

463 So. 2d 537, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 388, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12401

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1985 | Docket: 64609900

Published

motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f). AFFIRMED. HERSEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ

Category: Criminal Procedure

Derock v. State

461 So. 2d 1373, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 149, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 11905

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1985 | Docket: 64609219

Published

elected to stand mute. Therefore, in accord with Rule 3.170(c), Fla.R.Crim.P., the trial court entered a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Young v. State

458 So. 2d 5, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16475

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1984 | Docket: 64607655

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f); Brown v. State, 428 So.2d 369 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983);

Category: Criminal Procedure

Livolsi v. State

451 So. 2d 542, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13872

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 1984 | Docket: 64605401

Published

the order which pertains to count 1. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f); Frederick v. State, 419 So.2d 736 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Adams v. State

443 So. 2d 436, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11231

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1984 | Docket: 64602012

Published

Robinson, the failure of the trial court to follow rule 3.170(j) makes the plea itself invalid on constitutional

Category: Criminal Procedure

Downs v. State

439 So. 2d 963, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22724

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1983 | Docket: 64600285

Published

offers to plead guilty are inadmissible under Rule 3.170(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Waseleski v. State

429 So. 2d 77, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19442

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 1983 | Docket: 64596012

Published

enough to overcome the appellant’s evidence. Rule 3.170(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure provides:

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wallace v. State

389 So. 2d 10, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17810

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1980 | Docket: 64578402

Published

U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970); Rule 3.170(g), Fla.R.Crim.P.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Howell v. State

379 So. 2d 1292, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16337

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1979 | Docket: 64574415

Published

the plea and its voluntariness.” (e. s.) Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.170(j). However, a subsequent change in the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Right v. State

377 So. 2d 37

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1979 | Docket: 64572919

Published

plead guilty and was sentenced, and (7) that Rule 3.170(j) Fla. Rules of Criminal Procedure adopted December

Category: Criminal Procedure

Right v. State

377 So. 2d 37

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1979 | Docket: 64572919

Published

plead guilty and was sentenced, and (7) that Rule 3.170(j) Fla. Rules of Criminal Procedure adopted December

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wright v. State

376 So. 2d 236, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16156

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1979 | Docket: 64572512

Published

there is factual basis for the plea. Moreover, Rule 3.170(j) provides that no plea of guilty and nolo conten-dere

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dexter v. State

360 So. 2d 457, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15934

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1978 | Docket: 64565251

Published

for the acceptance of the plea, as outlined in Rule 3.170(j), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, appellant’s

Category: Criminal Procedure

Perez v. State

351 So. 2d 384, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16994

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1977 | Docket: 64561069

Published

judge properly accepted the guilty plea. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j) and Williams v. State, 316 So.2d 267 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Paxton v. Wainwright

349 So. 2d 177, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16504

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1977 | Docket: 64559851

Published

factual basis for the pleas as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170[j]) deprived him of his constitutional right

Category: Criminal Procedure

Florida Bar

345 So. 2d 655, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 4095

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1977 | Docket: 64558421

Published

court. (a)(7) Substantially the same as Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.170(f). (b)(1) Based on Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.190(a)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Archinal v. State

340 So. 2d 546, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16081

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1976 | Docket: 64556315

Published

understands the consequences of such a plea. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S

Category: Criminal Procedure

Prangler v. State

339 So. 2d 1158, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15798

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1976 | Docket: 64556140

Published

to vacate and set aside the judgment. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f), 3.850. AFFIRMED. McNULTY, C. J., and

Category: Criminal Procedure

Humphries v. State

336 So. 2d 432

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 1976 | Docket: 64554753

Published

of nolo contendere may be withdrawn. Although Rule 3.170(f) refers only to a plea of guilty we are of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kimbrough v. State

336 So. 2d 121, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15189

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1976 | Docket: 64554667

Published

eliciting a “factual basis” as dictated by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j).1 In support of this argument, appellant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Scheller v. State

327 So. 2d 876, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14753

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1976 | Docket: 64552700

Published

the voluntariness of his plea as required by Rule 3.170(j) RCrP. The appellant’s point on appeal is well

Category: Criminal Procedure

United States ex rel. Guinea v. Beard

407 F. Supp. 605, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16734

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1976 | Docket: 66114157

Published

the record a factual basis for the plea. See Rule 3.170(j), Fla.Rules of Cr.Proc. At the time of sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Douglas v. State

326 So. 2d 33, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14233

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1976 | Docket: 64552188

Published

plea in the light of the psychiatric report. Rule 3.-170(f) R.Cr.P. No such request is made on this appeal

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bright v. State

317 So. 2d 864, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13855

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1975 | Docket: 64548804

Published

case is that the trial judge did not comply with Rule 3.170(j) RCrP; he did not determine that there was

Category: Criminal Procedure

Qualls v. State

315 So. 2d 482, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14257

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 1975 | Docket: 64547999

Published

and proceed to trial on the merits. We affirm. Rule 3.170(f), F.Cr.P., provides: “(f) Withdrawal of Plea

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tucker v. State

316 So. 2d 297

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1975 | Docket: 1456303

Published

opinion that the crucial issue here is whether Rule 3.170(j), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires

Category: Criminal Procedure

Collins v. State

314 So. 2d 625, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13664

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1975 | Docket: 64547390

Published

urging that the procedural requirements imposed by Rule 3.170(j) RCrP and by Boykin v. Alabama, 1969, 395 U

Category: Criminal Procedure

McKie v. State

314 So. 2d 201, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13708

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1975 | Docket: 64547211

Published

RECORD A FACTUAL BASIS FOR THAT PLEA CONTRARY TO RULE 3.170(j) FRCrP, THUS DENYING DEFENDANT DUE PROCESS

Category: Criminal Procedure

Larrimore v. State

313 So. 2d 121, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14899

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1975 | Docket: 64546615

Published

based on the provisions of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.170. *122Neither the philosophy in Estes v. State

Category: Criminal Procedure

Willis v. State

312 So. 2d 522, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14995

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1975 | Docket: 64546284

Published

without ascertaining if there was a factual basis, Rule 3.170(j), Fla.R. Cr.P. We hold there was no reversible

Category: Criminal Procedure

Boyette v. State

311 So. 2d 786, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15120

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1975 | Docket: 64545975

Published

defendant alleged no prejudice for failure to follow Rule 3.170(j), FRCrP. Accordingly, we affirm upon the authority

Category: Criminal Procedure

Clary v. State

315 So. 2d 20, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13610

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1975 | Docket: 64547629

Published

was a factual basis for the pleas contrary to Rule 3.170(j), F.R.Cr.P. Our previous ruling in Estes v

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Garrett

310 So. 2d 751, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14072

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1975 | Docket: 64545566

Published

at the time of plea in criminal proceeding (Rule 3.-170(j), F.R.Cr.Proc.) and for proceedings in the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Porter v. State

308 So. 2d 580, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14545

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1975 | Docket: 64544645

Published

the significance of the pleas as required by Rule 3.170(j) *581RCrP. See Wooff v. State, Fla.App.2d 1974

Category: Criminal Procedure

Perry v. State

308 So. 2d 173, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14509

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1975 | Docket: 64544499

Published

the mandatory language of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.170 (j). Lyles v. State, 299 So.2d 146 (Fla.App.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

308 So. 2d 177, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14511

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1975 | Docket: 64544500

Published

the mandatory language of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.170(j). Lyles v. State, 299 So.2d 146 (Fla.App. 1st

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hurd v. State

307 So. 2d 922, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14685

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1975 | Docket: 64544382

Published

” In support thereof the appellant refers to Rule 3.170(f) RCrP, providing that the court may in its

Category: Criminal Procedure

Paxton v. State

304 So. 2d 485, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7528

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1974 | Docket: 64543104

Published

underlying factual basis for the pleas as required by Rule 3.170(j), F.R.Cr. P. No assignments of error having

Category: Criminal Procedure

Edmondson v. State

304 So. 2d 458, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7509

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 1974 | Docket: 64543092

Published

adequately complying with the requirements of Rule 3.170(j) CrPR. When the court accepted the guilty pleas

Category: Criminal Procedure

Grant v. State

303 So. 2d 425, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8328

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1974 | Docket: 64542674

Published

adequately complying with the requirements of Rule 3.170(j) CrPR. We believe the record adequately reflects

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wooff v. State

303 So. 2d 49, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8239

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1974 | Docket: 64542470

Published

pleas and their voluntariness, as required by Rule 3.170(j) RCrP. The record reflects that at the time

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

297 So. 2d 67

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1974 | Docket: 1510402

Published

meticulously conducted the hearing required by Criminal Rule 3.170(j) and was satisfied — as are we — that they

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rentfrow v. State

293 So. 2d 376, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7623

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 1974 | Docket: 64538527

Published

of the significance of the plea as required by Rule 3.170(j), RCr.P, 33 F.S.A. Accordingly, we respectfully

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas v. State

299 So. 2d 130, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8802

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 1974 | Docket: 64540711

Published

accepted by the court without compliance with Rule 3.-170(j) CrPR, 33 F.S.A.1 While the record shows absence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hopkins v. State

275 So. 2d 597, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7107

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1973 | Docket: 64531363

Published

knowingly and understandingly as provided in Rule 3.170(a), RCrP, 33 F.S.A. We have carefully examined

Category: Criminal Procedure

Paschke v. State

275 So. 2d 301, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7061

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1973 | Docket: 64531215

Published

knowingly and understandingly as provided in Rule 3.-170(a), RCrP., 33 F.S.A. We have carefully examined

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williamson v. State

273 So. 2d 784, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7319

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1973 | Docket: 64530668

Published

was entered voluntarily and understandingly. Rule 3.170(a), RCrP, 33 F.S.A., reads as follows: “. .

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas v. State

273 So. 2d 773

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1973 | Docket: 64530663

Published

demonstrate that defendant’s plea was voluntary. See Rule 3.170(a), F.R.Cr.P.2 See also Costello v. State, Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Schaefer v. State

264 So. 2d 121, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6529

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 1972 | Docket: 64526691

Published

First, no timely motion to withdraw was made. See Rule 3.170(f), CrPR, 33 F.S.A., and Stapleton v. State,

Category: Criminal Procedure