Florida Appellate Rule 9.340 - MANDATE | Syfert Law

Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

Florida Appellate Rule 9.340

RULE 9.340. MANDATE

(a) Issuance and Recall of Mandate. Unless otherwise
ordered by the court or provided by these rules, the clerk of the
court must issue such mandate or process as may be directed by
the court after expiration of 15 days from the date of an order or
decision. A copy thereof, or notice of its issuance, must be served
on all parties. The court may direct the clerk of the court to recall
the mandate, but not more than 120 days after its issuance.

(b) Extension of Time for Issuance of Mandate. Unless
otherwise provided by these rules, if a timely motion for rehearing,
clarification, certification, or issuance of a written opinion has been
filed, the time for issuance of the mandate or other process will be
extended until 15 days after rendition of the order denying the
motion, or, if granted, until 15 days after the cause has been fully
determined.

(c) Entry of Money Judgment. If a judgment of reversal is
entered that requires the entry of a money judgment on a verdict,
the mandate will be deemed to require such money judgment to be
entered as of the date of the verdict.

Committee Notes

1977 Amendment. This rule replaces former rule 3.15. The
power of the court to expedite as well as delay issuance of the
mandate, with or without motion, has been made express. That part
of former rule 3.15(a) regarding money judgments has been
eliminated as unnecessary. It is not intended to change the
substantive law there stated. The 15-day delay in issuance of
mandate is necessary to allow a stay to remain in effect for
purposes of rule 9.310(e). This automatic delay is inapplicable to
bond validation proceedings, which are governed by rule 9.330(c).

1984 Amendment. Subdivision (c) was added. It is a
repromulgation of former rule 3.15(a), which was deleted in 1977 as
being unnecessary. Experience proved it to be necessary.

Cases Citing Rule 9.340

Total Results: 66

Downs v. McNeil

520 F.3d 1311, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 6090, 2008 WL 756348

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 24, 2008 | Docket: 26437

Cited 101 times | Published

become final until the mandate issued, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.340(a). However, over the course of two decades

Category: Appellate Procedure

Huff v. State

569 So. 2d 1247, 1990 WL 154234

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1990 | Docket: 1190780

Cited 89 times | Published

Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, and rule 9.340(a), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, notification

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amend. to Fla. Rules of Appellate Proc.

685 So. 2d 773, 1996 WL 673822

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1996 | Docket: 1414934

Cited 65 times | Published

Fla.Stat. (Supp.1976). This rule interacts with rule 9.340, however, so that a party has 15 days between

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amend. to Fla. Rules of Appellate Proc.

696 So. 2d 1103, 1996 WL 908661

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1996 | Docket: 2037954

Cited 51 times | Published

Fla.Stat. (Supp.1976). This rule interacts with rule 9.340, however, so that a party has 15 days between

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amend. to Fla. Rules of Appellate Proc.

780 So. 2d 834, 2000 WL 1508541

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2000 | Docket: 1298753

Cited 19 times | Published

validation cases, in lieu of those prescribed by rule 9.340. Subdivision (d) makes clear that motions for

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amerace Corp. v. Stallings

823 So. 2d 110, 2002 WL 1290910

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2002 | Docket: 2490634

Cited 16 times | Published

process can last several months or even years, rule 9.340(c) provides that, in cases such as Green, interest

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re Proposed Florida Appellate Rules

351 So. 2d 981

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1977 | Docket: 1247477

Cited 16 times | Published

Stat. (Supp. 1976). This rule interacts with Rule 9.340, however, so that a party has 15 days between

Category: Appellate Procedure

State Ex Rel. Price v. McCord

380 So. 2d 1037

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1980 | Docket: 1402696

Cited 13 times | Published

a mandate issues, ... ." (Emphasis supplied.) Rule 9.340(a) provides that "[u]nless otherwise ordered

Category: Appellate Procedure

Loeb v. State

387 So. 2d 433

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1980 | Docket: 1355727

Cited 11 times | Published

Mack, 91 Fla. 284, 107 So. 918 (1926). [2] Fla.R.App.P. 9.340(a). [3] Fla.R.App.P. 9.310(a). [4] § 924

Category: Appellate Procedure

Calder Race Course, Inc. v. Illinois Union Insurance

714 F. Supp. 1183, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6918, 1989 WL 63977

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 12, 1989 | Docket: 2112029

Cited 9 times | Published

be entered as of the date of the verdict." Fla.R.App.P. 9.340(c). Since the supreme court reinstated the

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re Amendments to Florida Rules

609 So. 2d 516, 1992 WL 323929

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1992 | Docket: 1738396

Cited 8 times | Published

linguistic error found in the original subdivision. RULE 9.340. MANDATE (a) Issuance of Mandate. Unless otherwise

Category: Appellate Procedure

Mabrey v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.

438 So. 2d 937, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24494

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1983 | Docket: 1445706

Cited 7 times | Published

Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, in Fla.R.App.P. 9.340, have eliminated this language, but a 1977

Category: Appellate Procedure

Jones v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

871 So. 2d 899, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17101, 2003 WL 22657851

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2003 | Docket: 1300466

Cited 6 times | Published

from the date of the jury's verdict. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.340(c). The Confidentiality Order Finally, the

Category: Appellate Procedure

McNitt v. Osborne

371 So. 2d 696

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1979 | Docket: 1786742

Cited 6 times | Published

entry of the judgment ..."); cf. Comment to Fla. R.App.P. 9.340, referring to former Fla. App. Rule 3.15(a)

Category: Appellate Procedure

State v. Miyasato

805 So. 2d 818, 2001 WL 220012

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 2001 | Docket: 1669452

Cited 5 times | Published

after the denial of rehearing. *823 See Fla. R.App. P. 9.340(b). We did not do so. No judge of this court

Category: Appellate Procedure

Higdon v. State

465 So. 2d 1309, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 702

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1985 | Docket: 1324124

Cited 5 times | Published

days from the date of said decision.[1]See Fla.R. App.P. 9.340. Even had the mandate issued, we would have

Category: Appellate Procedure

Eldred v. Reber

639 So. 2d 1086, 1994 WL 363879

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1994 | Docket: 1310259

Cited 4 times | Published

dependent upon the post-judgment action of a party. Rule 9.340 is also helpful in determining when an order

Category: Appellate Procedure

City of Miami v. Arostegui

616 So. 2d 1117, 1993 WL 105443

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1993 | Docket: 1383627

Cited 4 times | Published

or unless otherwise modified or vacated. [2] Rule 9.340(a) provides: Issuance of Mandate. Unless otherwise

Category: Appellate Procedure

Tallahassee Medical Center v. Poole

547 So. 2d 1258, 1989 WL 97689

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 1989 | Docket: 1738678

Cited 4 times | Published

costs at $257.00, and found that pursuant to Rule 9.340(c), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, Poole

Category: Appellate Procedure

Rety v. Green

595 So. 2d 1036, 1992 WL 43212

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1992 | Docket: 1299031

Cited 3 times | Published

Procedure recognize an exception. As amended in 1984, Rule 9.340(c) granted authority to the trial court in some

Category: Appellate Procedure

Anderson v. DEPT. OF H & R. SERVICES

482 So. 2d 491, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 246

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1986 | Docket: 1769884

Cited 3 times | Published

impairment-of-contract arguments. Pursuant to rule 9.340, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, the clerk

Category: Appellate Procedure

Anderson v. DEPT. OF H & R. SERVICES

482 So. 2d 491, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 246

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1986 | Docket: 1769884

Cited 3 times | Published

impairment-of-contract arguments. Pursuant to rule 9.340, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, the clerk

Category: Appellate Procedure

Colonel v. Reed

379 So. 2d 1297

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1980 | Docket: 1681227

Cited 3 times | Published

the mandate as required by Florida Appellate Rule 9.340(a) should not militate against his interests

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re the Fla. Bar Rules of Appellate P.

529 So. 2d 687, 1988 WL 73713

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1988 | Docket: 1732579

Cited 2 times | Published

a particular decision. 7. Rule 9.340 is amended as follows: Rule 9.340 Mandate ... . (b) Extension

Category: Appellate Procedure

Montre D. Richardson v. State of Florida

257 So. 3d 605

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2018 | Docket: 8048724

Cited 1 times | Published

attachments—after our mandate has issued. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.340(a) (defining “mandate” and setting forth

Category: Appellate Procedure

Smith v. State

218 So. 3d 996, 2017 WL 1951097, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6531

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2017 | Docket: 6060353

Cited 1 times | Published

attach a motion to recall the mandate pursuant to rule 9.340.

Category: Appellate Procedure

Jackson v. Leon County Elections Canvassing Board

214 So. 3d 705, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17635

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 2016 | Docket: 60264226

Cited 1 times | Published

to settlement of parties); see generally Fla. R. App. P. 9.340 (2017); Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate

Category: Appellate Procedure

Shoemaker v. Sliger

187 So. 3d 863, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1975, 2016 WL 542861

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2016 | Docket: 60254140

Cited 1 times | Published

and remanding for entry of a money judgment, rule 9.340(c) sets the post-trial interest accrual date

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amendments to Fl. Rules for Cert. Mediators

993 So. 2d 505, 2008 WL 4587210

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2008 | Docket: 1006063

Cited 1 times | Published

shall be final upon issuance of a mandate under rule 9.340, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. NOTES

Category: Appellate Procedure

John Calvin German v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2024 | Docket: 68335766

Published

(citing § 43.44, Fla. Stat. (2019) and Fla. R. App. P. 9.340(a)). Based on the foregoing, we vacate

Category: Appellate Procedure

John Calvin German v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2024 | Docket: 68335766

Published

(citing § 43.44, Fla. Stat. (2019) and Fla. R. App. P. 9.340(a)). Based on the foregoing, we vacate

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2023 | Docket: 67875253

Published

[No Change] RULE 9.340. MANDATE (a) Issuance and Recall

Category: Appellate Procedure

ALEJANDRO QUINTAS VAZQUEZ v. AILYN M. REBAZA SMITH

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2021 | Docket: 59800749

Published

further review. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.310; Fla. R. App. P. 9.340(a). This court was required to issue its

Category: Appellate Procedure

Alexander v. Kalitan

263 So. 3d 70

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 2019 | Docket: 64702711

Published

to accrue from the date of the verdict citing rule 9.340(c), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, which

Category: Appellate Procedure

Alexander v. Kalitan

263 So. 3d 70

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 2019 | Docket: 64702710

Published

to accrue from the date of the verdict citing rule 9.340(c), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, which

Category: Appellate Procedure

ROB ALEXANDER, M.D. v. SUSAN KALITAN

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 2019 | Docket: 8485192

Published

to accrue from the date of the verdict citing rule 9.340(c), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, which

Category: Appellate Procedure

Chiropractic Clinics of South Florida v. the Responsive Auto Ins. Co.

250 So. 3d 729

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 2018 | Docket: 6958938

Published

the time for issuance of the mandate. Fla. R. App. P. 9.340(b); Pitzer, 95 So. 3d at 1006 (stating

Category: Appellate Procedure

American Federated Title Corp. v. Gross

224 So. 3d 301, 2017 WL 3161071, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10648

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2017 | Docket: 6126101

Published

Appellate Procedure 9.340(a) (section 43.44 and rule 9.340(a) provide a mechanism for a party to seek to

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule for Certified and Court-Appointed Mediators 10.900

217 So. 3d 990, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 526, 2017 WL 1739248, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 970

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2017 | Docket: 6058575

Published

shall be final upon issuance of a mandate under rule 9.340, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. LABARGA

Category: Appellate Procedure

Dr. Erwin D. Jackson v. Leon County Elections Canvassing Board

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2017 | Docket: 4670974

Published

settlement of parties); see generally Fla. R. App. P. 9.340 (2017); Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES FOR CERTIFIED AND COURT-APPOINTED MEDIATORS

202 So. 3d 795, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 477, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2362

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 2016 | Docket: 4483117

Published

shall-be finab-upon-issuance of a mandate -under-rule 9.340, Florida Rules of Appellate -Procedure.

Category: Appellate Procedure

Doe v. State

210 So. 3d 154

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2016 | Docket: 4426655

Published

(granting writ of mandamus and concluding that rule 9.340 created a ministerial duty under specific circumstances);

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2014 | Docket: 2616692

Published

[No Change] RULE 9.340. MANDATE (a) [No Change]

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

183 So. 3d 245, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 665, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 3296, 2014 WL 5714099

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2014 | Docket: 2593366

Published

Change] Court Commentary [No Change] RULE 9.340. MANDATE (a) [No Change] (b) Extension

Category: Appellate Procedure

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration & the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

125 So. 3d 743, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 776, 2013 WL 5878859, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2350

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 2013 | Docket: 60236061

Published

such action. (5) [No Change] (c)-(e) [No Change] RULE 9.340. MANDATE (a)Issuance and Recall of Mandate. Unless

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration

24 So. 3d 47, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 609, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1921, 2009 WL 3763128

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2009 | Docket: 1648737

Published

"legal custodian of the child.” Additionally, rule 9.340(b), Extension of Time for Issuance of Mandate

Category: Appellate Procedure

Mitchell v. State

160 So. 3d 902, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12809, 2009 WL 2841189

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 2009 | Docket: 60246935

Published

authority to withhold the issuance of mandate under rule 9.340(a) in the absence of a pending motion for rehearing

Category: Appellate Procedure

Hyundai Motor Co. v. Ferayorni

876 So. 2d 680, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8720, 2004 WL 1393448

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 2004 | Docket: 64831366

Published

entered as of the date of the verdict.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.340(c). While the Amerace court held that interest

Category: Appellate Procedure

General Motors Corp. v. McGee

867 So. 2d 1244, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3326, 2004 WL 515543

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2004 | Docket: 64828880

Published

Aug.13, 2003). General Motors acknowledges that rule 9.340(c) provides for the award of interest in the

Category: Appellate Procedure

Ford Motor Co. v. Jimenez ex rel. Jimenez

870 So. 2d 831, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12330, 2003 WL 21919264

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2003 | Docket: 64829874

Published

which there is an appellate reversal involving rule 9.340(c). That exception is not involved in this case

Category: Appellate Procedure

Doyle-Vallery v. Aranibar

838 So. 2d 1200, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3359, 2003 WL 1092861

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2003 | Docket: 64821035

Published

Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330(a). See Fla. R.App. P. 9.340; State ex rel. Price v. McCord, 380 So.2d

Category: Appellate Procedure

American Home Assurance Co. v. Apac-Florida, Inc.

841 So. 2d 556, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3086, 2003 WL 1025409

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2003 | Docket: 64821751

Published

Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330(a). See Fla.R.App. P. 9.340; State ex rel. Price v. McCord, 380 So.2d

Category: Appellate Procedure

Skiba v. State

827 So. 2d 379, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14571, 2002 WL 31250980

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2002 | Docket: 64817919

Published

the hands of prison officials.”). Pursuant to Rule 9.340(b), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, "[i]f

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

827 So. 2d 888, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 730, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1810, 2002 WL 1981372

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2002 | Docket: 64818042

Published

validation cases, in lieu of those prescribed by rule 9.340. Subdivision (d) makes clear that motions for

Category: Appellate Procedure

Brown v. Estate of Stuckey

710 So. 2d 679, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4594, 1998 WL 197541

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 1998 | Docket: 64780856

Published

616 So.2d 433 (Fla.1993), the court held that rule 9.340(c) requires that, upon reversal of a trial court

Category: Appellate Procedure

Washington v. State

637 So. 2d 296, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4640

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1994 | Docket: 64748513

Published

mandate until disposition of the motion. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.340(b). An opinion granting the motion issued

Category: Appellate Procedure

Washington v. State

637 So. 2d 296, 1994 WL 182013

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1994 | Docket: 1521448

Published

mandate until disposition of the motion. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.340(b). An opinion granting the motion issued

Category: Appellate Procedure

State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. South Beach Pharmacy, Inc.

635 So. 2d 117, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3339, 1994 WL 120047

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1994 | Docket: 64747681

Published

after the cause has been fully determined. Fla.R.App.P. 9.340(a) and (b). . An agency faced with reversal

Category: Appellate Procedure

Murphy v. State

616 So. 2d 1100, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3867, 1993 WL 102148

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1993 | Docket: 64695646

Published

after the date of the appellate decision. Fla. R.App.P. 9.340(a). However, if, as in this case, a timely

Category: Appellate Procedure

Womack v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

569 So. 2d 1362, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8766, 1990 WL 178663

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1990 | Docket: 64654575

Published

opinion of this court was not final. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.340(b) (motion for rehearing extends mandate

Category: Appellate Procedure

In re Florida Bar

536 So. 2d 240, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 15, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 1484

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1988 | Docket: 64639477

Published

to a particular decision. 7. Rule 9.340 is amended as follows: Rule 9.340 Mandate [[Image here]] (b) Extension

Category: Appellate Procedure

State v. Broom

526 So. 2d 158, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5875, 1988 WL 53081

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 1988 | Docket: 64635206

Published

proceeding in the Florida Supreme Court. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.340(a). Only the supreme court may review an

Category: Appellate Procedure

Priest v. State

483 So. 2d 900, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 572, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6719

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1986 | Docket: 64617572

Published

the mandate with the release of this opinion. Rule 9.340, Fla.R.App.P. REVERSED AND REMANDED. BOOTH, C

Category: Appellate Procedure

Antennas for Communication v. Compton

482 So. 2d 610, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 405, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6354

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1986 | Docket: 64617175

Published

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Pursuant to rule 9.340, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Clerk is directed

Category: Appellate Procedure

Florida Bar re Rules of Appellate Procedure

463 So. 2d 1114, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 127, 10 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 127, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3392

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1984 | Docket: 64610016

Published

jurisdictions that provide for en banc proceedings. Rule 9.340 has been amended to reinstate section (c), which

Category: Appellate Procedure

Williams v. Beard

422 So. 2d 909, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21366

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1982 | Docket: 64593716

Published

date that it would otherwise issue under Fla.R.App.P. 9.340 so that the appellant may have an opportunity

Category: Appellate Procedure