Florida Appellate Rule 9.300 - MOTIONS | Syfert Law

Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

Florida Appellate Rule 9.300

RULE 9.300. MOTIONS

(a) Contents of Motion; Response. Unless otherwise
prescribed by these rules, an application for an order or other relief
available under these rules shall be made by filing a motion
therefor. The motion shall state the grounds on which it is based,
the relief sought, argument in support thereof, and appropriate
citations of authority. A motion for an extension of time shall, and
other motions if appropriate may, contain a certificate that the
movant’s counsel has consulted opposing counsel and that the
movant’s counsel is authorized to represent that opposing counsel
either has no objection or will promptly file an objection. A motion
may be accompanied by an appendix, which may include affidavits
and other appropriate supporting documents not contained in the
record. With the exception of motions filed pursuant to rule
9.410(b), a party may serve 1 response to a motion within 15 days
of service of the motion. The court may shorten or extend the time
for response to a motion.

(b) Effect on Proceedings. Except as prescribed by
subdivision (d) of this rule, service of a motion shall toll the time
schedule of any proceeding in the court until disposition of the
motion. An order granting an extension of time for any act shall
automatically extend the time for all other acts that bear a time
relation to it. An order granting an extension of time for preparation
of the record, or the index to the record, or for filing of the
transcript of proceedings, shall extend automatically, for a like
period, the time for service of the next brief due in the proceedings.
A conformed copy of an order extending time shall be transmitted
forthwith to the clerk of the lower tribunal until the record has been
transmitted to the court.

(c) Emergency Relief; Notice. A party seeking emergency
relief shall, if practicable, give reasonable notice to all parties.

(d) Motions Not Tolling Time.

(1) Motions for post-trial release, rule 9.140(g).

(2) Motions for stay pending appeal, rule 9.310.

(3) Motions relating to oral argument, rule 9.320.

(4) Motions relating to joinder and substitution of
parties, rule 9.360.

(5) Motions relating to amicus curiae, rule 9.370.

(6) Motions relating to attorneys’ fees on appeal, rule
9.400.

(7) Motions relating to service, rule 9.420.

(8) Motions relating to admission or withdrawal of
attorneys, rule 9.440.

(9) Motions relating to sanctions, rule 9.410.

(10) Motions relating to expediting the appeal.

(11) Motions relating to appeal proceedings to review a
final order dismissing a petition for judicial waiver of parental notice
and consent or consent only to termination of pregnancy, rule
9.147.

(12) Motions for mediation filed more than 30 days after
the notice of appeal, rule 9.700(d).

Committee Notes
1977 Amendment. This rule replaces former rule 3.9.

Subdivision (a) is new, except to the extent it replaces former
rule 3.9(g), and is intended to outline matters required to be
included in motions. These provisions are necessary because it is
anticipated that oral argument will only rarely be permitted. Any
matters that formerly would have been included in a brief on a
motion should be included in the motion. Although affidavits and
other documents not appearing in the record may be included in
the appendix, it is to be emphasized that such materials are limited
to matter germane to the motion, and are not to include matters
related to the merits of the case. The advisory committee was of the
view that briefs on motions are cumbersome and unnecessary. The
advisory committee anticipates that the motion document will
become simple and unified, with unnecessary technical language
eliminated. Routine motions usually require only limited argument.
Provision is made for a response by the opposing party. No further
responses by either party are permitted, however, without an order
of the court entered on the court’s own motion or the motion of a
party. To ensure cooperation and communication between opposing
counsel, and conservation of judicial resources, a party moving for
an extension of time is required to certify that opposing counsel has
been consulted, and either has no objection or intends to serve an
objection promptly. The certificate may also be used for other
motions if appropriate. Only the motions listed in subdivision (d) do
not toll the time for performance of the next act. Subdivision (d)(9)
codifies current practice in the supreme court, where motions do
not toll time unless the court approves a specific request, for good
cause shown, to toll time for the performance of the next act. Very
few motions filed in that court warrant a delay in further procedural
steps to be taken in a case.

The advisory committee considered and rejected as unwise a
proposal to allow at least 15 days to perform the next act after a
motion tolling time was disposed.

Subdivision (b) replaces former rule 3.9(f).

Subdivision (c) is new and has been included at the request of
members of the judiciary. It is intended to require that counsel
make a reasonable effort to give actual notice to opposing counsel
when emergency relief is sought from a court.

Specific reference to motions to quash or dismiss appeals
contained in former rules 3.9(b) and (c) has been eliminated as
unnecessary. It is not intended that such motions be abolished.
Courts have the inherent power to quash frivolous appeals, and
subdivision (a) guarantees to any party the right to file a motion.
Although no special time limitations are placed on such motions,
delay in presenting any motion may influence the relief granted or
sanctions imposed under rule 9.410.

As was the case under former rule 3.8, a motion may be filed
in either the lower tribunal or the court, in accordance with rule
9.600.

1980 Amendment. Subdivision (b) was amended to require
the clerk of either court to notify the other clerk when an extension
of time has been granted, up to the time that the record on appeal
has been transmitted to the court, so that the clerk of the lower
tribunal will be able to properly compute the time for transmitting
the record on appeal, and that both courts may properly compute
the time for performing subsequent acts.

1992 Amendment. Subdivision (b) was amended to clarify an
uncertainty over time deadlines. The existing rule provided that an
extension of time for performing an act automatically extended for a
comparable period any other act that had a time relation thereto.
The briefing schedule, however, is related by time only to the filing
of the notice of appeal. Accordingly, this amendment provides that
orders extending the time for preparation of the record, the index to
the record, or a transcript, automatically extends for the same
period the time for service of the initial brief. Subdivision (b) also
was amended to correlate with rule 9.600(a), which provides that
only an appellate court may grant an extension of time.

Cases Citing Rule 9.300

Total Results: 63

Amend. to Fla. Rules of Appellate Proc.

685 So. 2d 773, 1996 WL 673822

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1996 | Docket: 1414934

Cited 65 times | Published

authorities be significant to the issues raised. RULE 9.300. MOTIONS (a) Contents of Motion; Response. Unless

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amend. to Fla. Rules of Appellate Proc.

696 So. 2d 1103, 1996 WL 908661

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1996 | Docket: 2037954

Cited 51 times | Published

authorities be significant to the issues raised. RULE 9.300. MOTIONS (a) Contents of Motion; Response. Unless

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re Proposed Florida Appellate Rules

351 So. 2d 981

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1977 | Docket: 1247477

Cited 16 times | Published

document may be omitted where not relevant. Rule 9.300 Motions (a) Contents of Motion; Response. Unless

Category: Appellate Procedure

Thornton v. Thornton

433 So. 2d 682

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1983 | Docket: 1727456

Cited 15 times | Published

motion was filed by appellee as is permitted by Rule 9.300 of the appellate rules. The problems involved

Category: Appellate Procedure

UNITED AUTO. INS. v. Total Rehab & Medical Center

870 So. 2d 866, 2004 WL 231799

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2004 | Docket: 1697906

Cited 13 times | Published

including extensions of time for filing briefs. Fla. R.App. P. 9.300. Successive extensions of time are permissible

Category: Appellate Procedure

Sheffield v. Davis

562 So. 2d 384, 1990 WL 68724

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 1990 | Docket: 1674553

Cited 12 times | Published

Fla.R.Juv.P. 8.170, 8.230 and 8.820. [6] Fla.R.App.P. 9.300. [7] Fla.R.Jud.Admin. 6-10.5 and 6-12.-5

Category: Appellate Procedure

Straley v. Frank

650 So. 2d 628, 1994 WL 665573

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 1994 | Docket: 1703127

Cited 9 times | Published

Fla. Const.; § 35.08, Fla. Stat. (1993); Fla.R.App.P. 9.300 & 9.400(c). When an appellate court's mandate

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re Amendments to Florida Rules

609 So. 2d 516, 1992 WL 323929

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1992 | Docket: 1738396

Cited 8 times | Published

bound separately if reduction is impractical. Rule 9.300(b) is amended to provide that orders extending

Category: Appellate Procedure

Mills v. Heenan

382 So. 2d 1317

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1980 | Docket: 1255586

Cited 8 times | Published

extend the time for response to a motion. Fla.R.App.P. 9.300(a).

Category: Appellate Procedure

Dubowitz v. Century Village East, Inc.

381 So. 2d 252

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1979 | Docket: 1758145

Cited 8 times | Published

a tolling of the time for filing briefs under Rule 9.300(b). The reader may well be disposed to remark:

Category: Appellate Procedure

Magier v. SOLOMON & BENEDICT, PA

704 So. 2d 685, 1997 WL 816501

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1997 | Docket: 1354193

Cited 5 times | Published

contact them to request this extension pursuant to rule 9.300(a), they fail to recognize that the motion was

Category: Appellate Procedure

Ferguson v. Ferguson

504 So. 2d 541

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1987 | Docket: 453334

Cited 5 times | Published

the position of opposing counsel as required by Rule 9.300(a). By order of January 12, 1987, this court

Category: Appellate Procedure

Agrico Chemical v. DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL REG.

380 So. 2d 503

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1980 | Docket: 1402867

Cited 5 times | Published

tolled the time for such service pursuant to Rule 9.300(d), Fla.R.App.P. Thus, cross-appellant urges

Category: Appellate Procedure

Wilkinson v. McDonough

960 So. 2d 911, 2007 WL 2089289

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2007 | Docket: 448379

Cited 4 times | Published

within which petitioner must reply. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.300(b) (providing that, "[e]xcept as prescribed

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amendments to Rules of Appellate Procedure

941 So. 2d 352, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 732, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2544, 2006 WL 3025623

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 2006 | Docket: 299199

Cited 4 times | Published

available to both an appellant and a cross-appellant. Rule 9.300(d), which addresses motions not tolling time

Category: Appellate Procedure

Lowe Inv. Corp. v. Clemente

685 So. 2d 84, 1996 WL 737021

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1996 | Docket: 1735104

Cited 4 times | Published

the standard for rehearing on appeal. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.300(a). The often-quoted passage from Judge Wigginton's

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amend. to Fla. Rules of Workers'comp.

664 So. 2d 945, 1995 WL 656744

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1995 | Docket: 1655898

Cited 4 times | Published

300. This change is essentially identical with rule 9.300 with the exception of the addition of subdivision

Category: Appellate Procedure

Howard v. Baumer

519 So. 2d 679, 1988 WL 6596

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1988 | Docket: 1332425

Cited 4 times | Published

themselves toll the time for serving the brief. Fla.R.App.P. 9.300. Had the motions been filed more than one

Category: Appellate Procedure

In RE: AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure-Electronic Service.

257 So. 3d 66

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2018 | Docket: 8081303

Cited 3 times | Published

change] Court Commentary [No change] RULE 9.300. MOTIONS (a) Contents of Motion; Response

Category: Appellate Procedure

Advanced Chiropractic and Rehabilitation Center, Corp. v. United Automobile Insurance Co.

140 So. 3d 529, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 360, 2014 WL 2208895, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1743

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 29, 2014 | Docket: 795933

Cited 2 times | Published

proceeding, we hold that rule 9.300, which governs appellate motions, controls. Rule 9.300 states: “Unless otherwise

Category: Appellate Procedure

Hall v. HUMANA HOSPITAL DAYTONA BEACH

733 So. 2d 596, 1999 WL 375575

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1999 | Docket: 1188169

Cited 2 times | Published

GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Fla. R.App. P. 9.300(b). [2] Section 57.041 provides: 57.041

Category: Appellate Procedure

Ciba-Geigy Ltd. v. Fish Peddler, Inc.

683 So. 2d 522, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 14342, 1996 WL 366404

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1996 | Docket: 2482304

Cited 2 times | Published

for the motion to contain that information. See Rule 9.300(a). STONE, WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re the Fla. Bar Rules of Appellate P.

529 So. 2d 687, 1988 WL 73713

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1988 | Docket: 1732579

Cited 2 times | Published

separate petition, requested that this Court amend Rule 9.300(d) to eliminate the tolling of time for motions

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

41 So. 3d 885, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 367, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 995, 2010 WL 2518252

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 2010 | Docket: 1668351

Cited 1 times | Published

section 57.105(4), under the current requirement of rule 9.300(b), for, as the Committee explains, "a response

Category: Appellate Procedure

Hale v. Shear Express, Inc.

946 So. 2d 94, 2006 WL 3813734

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 2006 | Docket: 1771165

Cited 1 times | Published

was not timely served, we strike it. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.300(a) (requiring that a response to a motion

Category: Appellate Procedure

St. Paul v. IINA

675 So. 2d 590, 1996 WL 336041

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 1996 | Docket: 1323365

Cited 1 times | Published

set forth in rule 9.300. The tolling period for appellate motions is controlled by rule 9.300(b), which

Category: Appellate Procedure

Ginder v. Ginder

531 So. 2d 226, 1988 WL 95696

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1988 | Docket: 1528584

Cited 1 times | Published

opposing counsel had objection as required by Rule 9.300(a). Appellant responded to appellee's motions

Category: Appellate Procedure

Hilltop Developers, Inc. v. Masterpiece Homes, Inc.

455 So. 2d 1155

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1984 | Docket: 64606820

Cited 1 times | Published

to the expeditious handling of motions under rule 9.300 that this court be able to rely upon the accuracy

Category: Appellate Procedure

Curtis M. Gorham v. Dr. Gary H. Lavine, Dr. Emily D. Billingsley, Kendrea Virgil, RN, Lloyd G. Logue, Donna Baird, Joseph R. Impicciche (CEO), Junco Emergency Physicians

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2023 | Docket: 68042991

Published

post-decision arguments in a single document. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.300(b). Any such motion may not merely repeat

Category: Appellate Procedure

Gorham v. Cousin, Baird

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2023 | Docket: 68042689

Published

post-decision arguments in a single document. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.300(b). Any such motion may not merely repeat

Category: Appellate Procedure

Gorham v. State of Florida, Lavine

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2023 | Docket: 68042988

Published

post-decision arguments in a single document. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.300(b). Any such motion may not merely repeat

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420, the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure, and the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure—2020 Joint Fast-Track Report

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2021 | Docket: 59704005

Published

dismissing petitions for judicial waivers, and rule 9.300(d)(11), which provides that motions filed relating

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure - 2020 Regular-Cycle Report

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2021 | Docket: 59245136

Published

[NO CHANGE] RULE 9.300. MOTIONS (a)-(c)

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure - 2020 Regular-Cycle Report

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2020 | Docket: 18584684

Published

[NO CHANGE] RULE 9.300. MOTIONS (a)-(c)

Category: Appellate Procedure

Jedak Corp. v. Seabreeze Office Assoc.

248 So. 3d 242

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2018 | Docket: 7000934

Published

motions for which he sought an extension. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.300(b). We base this assumption on three facts

Category: Appellate Procedure

Windhaven Ins. Co. v. Biscayne Rehab Center, Inc.

243 So. 3d 1034

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 2018 | Docket: 6360286

Published

continuance had been granted. However, pursuant to Rule 9.300(b), the time was tolled by the filing of Windhaven’s

Category: Appellate Procedure

Jarrette Bay Investments Corp. v. BankUnited, N.A.

207 So. 3d 345, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17681

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2016 | Docket: 4546366

Published

citing to rule 9.410(b), Bank-United cites to rule 9.300 (the general appellate rule related to motions)

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2014 | Docket: 2616692

Published

[No Change] RULE 9.300. MOTIONS (a) [No Change]

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

183 So. 3d 245, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 665, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 3296, 2014 WL 5714099

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2014 | Docket: 2593366

Published

Change] Court Commentary [No Change] RULE 9.300. MOTIONS (a) [No Change] (b) Effect

Category: Appellate Procedure

In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.300

967 So. 2d 194, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 655, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 1901, 2007 WL 3023984

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2007 | Docket: 64852745

Published

Amendments). Since adopting the amendments to rule 9.300 that deleted previous subdivision (d)(10), the

Category: Appellate Procedure

Mercury Casualty Co. v. Rural Metro Ambulance Inc.

909 So. 2d 408, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12766, 2005 WL 1991778

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 2005 | Docket: 64840145

Published

Attorney’s Fees within 10 days as required by Fla. R.App. P. 9.300(a).... ” Mercury seeks certiorari review

Category: Appellate Procedure

Wood v. State

827 So. 2d 360, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14301, 2002 WL 31202449

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2002 | Docket: 64817898

Published

motion. We agree and grant the petition. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.300 (2000); see, e.g., Marty v. Bainter, 709

Category: Appellate Procedure

Arena Parking, Inc. v. Lon Worth Crow Insurance Agency

802 So. 2d 344, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13433, 2001 WL 1130678

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2001 | Docket: 64810946

Published

filed a Motion to Enforce Mandate pursuant to Rule 9.300 of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Category: Appellate Procedure

Publix Supermarkets, Inc. v. Arnold

707 So. 2d 1161, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1877, 1998 WL 80431

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1998 | Docket: 64779776

Published

to file an initial brief. In accordance with rule 9.300(a) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

Category: Appellate Procedure

Merritt v. Promo Graphics, Inc.

679 So. 2d 1277, 1996 WL 543941

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1996 | Docket: 1214963

Published

to the expeditious handling of motions under rule 9.300 that this court be able to rely upon the accuracy

Category: Appellate Procedure

Gallagher Financial Systems, Inc. v. Chateau Investments Ass'n

659 So. 2d 288, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9812, 1994 WL 552542

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1994 | Docket: 64758301

Published

and appropriate citations of authority.” Fla.R.App.P. 9.300(a). Gallagher contends that Chateau does

Category: Appellate Procedure

City of Miami Beach v. Korostishevski

619 So. 2d 493, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6236, 1993 WL 196336

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1993 | Docket: 64696636

Published

file a motion. Fla. R.Work.Comp.P. 4.230(a); Fla.R.App.P. 9.300(a). Sending a letter or making a telephone

Category: Appellate Procedure

North Florida Regional Medical Center v. Witt

616 So. 2d 614, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4418, 1993 WL 107057

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1993 | Docket: 64695419

Published

and we therefore assumed it was served by mail. Rule 9.300(b) permits a party to serve a response to a motion

Category: Appellate Procedure

Lurie v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.

605 So. 2d 1023, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10891, 1992 WL 282100

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1992 | Docket: 64670150

Published

authorize a reply to a response to a motion, see Fla.R.App.P. 9.300(a), and such unauthorized pleadings are ordinarily

Category: Appellate Procedure

Copelin v. State

558 So. 2d 90, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1337, 1990 WL 19934

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1990 | Docket: 64648756

Published

opposing counsel had objection as required by Fla.R.App.P. 9.300(a), and the motion was therefore held by

Category: Appellate Procedure

Downey v. Zier & Hacker, P.A.

556 So. 2d 509, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 657, 1990 WL 8604

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1990 | Docket: 64647999

Published

motion timely served which is not excepted by rule 9.300(d), tolls the time schedule of any appellate

Category: Appellate Procedure

Pure Fresh Enterprises, Inc. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco

519 So. 2d 676, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 257, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 215, 1988 WL 4030

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1988 | Docket: 64632502

Published

appeal, such an affidavit may accompany a motion, Rule 9.300(a), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Category: Appellate Procedure

Ours v. Ours

522 So. 2d 29, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1369, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8452, 1986 WL 20604

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1986 | Docket: 64633552

Published

herself of the opportunity to respond pursuant to Rule 9.300(a) and clarify her position, but she did not

Category: Appellate Procedure

Creel v. Affordable Homes of Pensacola, Inc.

443 So. 2d 1080, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11379

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1984 | Docket: 64602170

Published

time did not comply with the requirements of Rule 9.300(a) and did not explain why appellant had failed

Category: Appellate Procedure

McClain v. FLA. PAROLE & PROBATION COM'N

416 So. 2d 1209

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1982 | Docket: 1225284

Published

DCA 1962); § 59.33, Fla. Stat. (1981); and Fla.R.App.P. 9.300 and commentary. In the instant appeal, however

Category: Appellate Procedure

Williams v. Greadington

410 So. 2d 644, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19382

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1982 | Docket: 64588292

Published

filing a motion for extension, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.300(a). Prisoners need not consult opposing counsel

Category: Appellate Procedure

Anderson v. Willis

402 So. 2d 1344, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20973

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 1981 | Docket: 64584854

Published

motion to dismiss tolled the time schedule. Fla.R. App.P. 9.300(b). When respondent/appellee served its motion

Category: Appellate Procedure

Sebree v. Salcedo

390 So. 2d 801, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18164

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1980 | Docket: 64579014

Published

fifteen day period in which to file a response. Fla.R.App.P. 9.300, 9.420(d). We vacate the dismissal order

Category: Appellate Procedure

In re Florida Workers' Compensation Rules of Procedure

390 So. 2d 698, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4395

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1980 | Docket: 64578981

Published

Florida Appellate Rule 9.300. This change is essentially identical with Rule 9.300 with the exception

Category: Appellate Procedure

Florida Bar

387 So. 2d 920, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4350

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1980 | Docket: 64577996

Published

relating to limitations of number of copies. 4. Rule 9.300(b) is amended as follows: (b) Effect on Proceedings

Category: Appellate Procedure

Thatcher v. State

385 So. 2d 163, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16648

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1980 | Docket: 64576900

Published

raised by a motion to dismiss the appeal under Rule 9.300, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Category: Appellate Procedure

Times Publishing Co. v. Florida Department of Corrections

375 So. 2d 304, 5 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1510, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14957

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1979 | Docket: 64572030

Published

these proceedings on an expedited basis. See Fla.R. App.P. 9.300(c). Since the principal place of business

Category: Appellate Procedure

Gantt v. Volusia County Health Facilities Authority

360 So. 2d 387, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4891

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1978 | Docket: 64565230

Published

OVERTON, C. J., and ALDERMAN, J., concur. . Fla.R.App.P. 9.300(b) and (d)(9). . Fla.R.App.P. 9.410.

Category: Appellate Procedure