Cases Citing Rule 9.140
Total Results: 500
730 So. 2d 296, 1999 WL 34708
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1999 | Docket: 1645757
Cited 33 times | Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b).
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d).
Although the preclusive language of
Category: Appellate Procedure
739 So. 2d 77, 1999 WL 343072
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1999 | Docket: 1688796
Cited 24 times | Published
sufficient grounds for a belated appeal under rule 9.140(j). See id.
In an en banc decision, the First
Category: Appellate Procedure
770 So. 2d 1221, 2000 WL 1637591
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2000 | Docket: 1779207
Cited 23 times | Published
1982); see generally Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1). This is in contrast to rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), which authorizes
Category: Appellate Procedure
46 So. 3d 1171, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 16637, 2010 WL 4320398
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2010 | Docket: 1927482
Cited 13 times | Published
raised in his rule 3.800(b) motion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e) (noting that sentencing errors must be
Category: Appellate Procedure
915 So. 2d 740, 2005 WL 3327342
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2005 | Docket: 1150608
Cited 10 times | Published
plea; and a sentencing error, if preserved. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A); Liebman v. State, 853 So.2d 514
Category: Appellate Procedure
94 So. 3d 468, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 259, 2012 WL 1123738, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 641
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2012 | Docket: 60310893
Cited 9 times | Published
purposes of a state appeal” under section 924.07 or rule 9.140(c). McMahon, 47 So.3d at 369 (citing Figuer*471oa
Category: Appellate Procedure
919 So. 2d 669, 2006 WL 197215
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2006 | Docket: 1269121
Cited 8 times | Published
the merits of the claim. See id.; see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A). Furthermore, even if we were to
Category: Appellate Procedure
708 So. 2d 289, 1998 WL 10878
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1998 | Docket: 1528296
Cited 8 times | Published
motion to correct sentencing errors. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(iv), (d). We write to discuss the
Category: Appellate Procedure
224 So. 3d 803, 2017 WL 3316912, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11252
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2017 | Docket: 60271728
Cited 7 times | Published
theft (count 2). We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A), (F). We affirm Mr. Devlin’s judgment
Category: Appellate Procedure
804 F.3d 1137, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 18449, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1743
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 23, 2015 | Docket: 3006584
Cited 7 times | Published
to file a timely appeal.
See
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(3). When he failed to do so, 105 more
Category: Appellate Procedure
22 So. 3d 745, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17235, 2009 WL 3837228
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2009 | Docket: 1639879
Cited 7 times | Published
appeal only under limited circumstances. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i)-(ii). One such circumstance
Category: Appellate Procedure
16 So. 3d 280, 2009 WL 2602282
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2009 | Docket: 1641028
Cited 7 times | Published
dispositive order of the trial court. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). A motion is dispositive if
Category: Appellate Procedure
16 So. 3d 280, 2009 WL 2602282
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2009 | Docket: 1641028
Cited 7 times | Published
dispositive order of the trial court. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). A motion is dispositive if
Category: Appellate Procedure
93 So. 3d 473, 2012 WL 2946509, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11741
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2012 | Docket: 60310610
Cited 6 times | Published
judgment" in criminal cases. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D) (formerly rule 9.140(b)(1)(C)). It is arguable
Category: Appellate Procedure
992 So. 2d 304, 2008 WL 4330020
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 2008 | Docket: 1723189
Cited 6 times | Published
proceedings. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i). Neither the transcript of defendant's
Category: Appellate Procedure
919 So. 2d 684, 2006 WL 229051
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2006 | Docket: 2589335
Cited 6 times | Published
matters regarding his plea and sentence. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i)-(ii). Mr. Greene's admission
Category: Appellate Procedure
914 So. 2d 1070, 2005 WL 3179892
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2005 | Docket: 2356876
Cited 6 times | Published
counsel is considered to have withdrawn. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d)(1)(D). Because Mingo still had counsel
Category: Appellate Procedure
219 So. 3d 160, 2017 WL 1788017, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6367
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 2017 | Docket: 6061255
Cited 5 times | Published
appeal certain enumerated orders, id (citing Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)), and the order under consideration here
Category: Appellate Procedure
135 So. 3d 1153, 2014 WL 1600443, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5739
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2014 | Docket: 60239449
Cited 5 times | Published
regarding an unrelated discovery order.
Pursuant to rule 9.140(c)(1)(B) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
143 So. 3d 936, 2014 WL 1258540, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4679
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2014 | Docket: 60242395
Cited 5 times | Published
Stat. (2010). We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A). Because the trial court erred
Category: Appellate Procedure
19 So. 3d 1045, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14520, 2009 WL 3103888
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2009 | Docket: 1651513
Cited 5 times | Published
and sentence. This court has jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A).
Battle was charged by information
Category: Appellate Procedure
16 So. 3d 280, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12518
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2009 | Docket: 60246753
Cited 5 times | Published
dispositive order of the trial court. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). A motion is dispositive if
Category: Appellate Procedure
821 So. 2d 385, 2002 WL 1466261
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2002 | Docket: 1236526
Cited 5 times | Published
trial court enters that final order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(N) (permitting State to appeal orders
Category: Appellate Procedure
264 So. 3d 1055
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2019 | Docket: 64705092
Cited 4 times | Published
court's order dismissing the information. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A) ("The state may appeal an order
Category: Appellate Procedure
217 So. 3d 215, 2017 WL 1401463, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5363
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2017 | Docket: 60265671
Cited 4 times | Published
illegal sentence”). We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D).
Because a sentencing error involves
Category: Appellate Procedure
219 So. 3d 14, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 451, 2017 WL 1366987, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 829
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2017 | Docket: 4684619
Cited 4 times | Published
at 1260-61 (footnote omitted) (citing Fla. R.. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i)). The Fifth District reasoned
Category: Appellate Procedure
187 So. 3d 283, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2967, 2016 WL 764734
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 29, 2016 | Docket: 60254035
Cited 4 times | Published
denial.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.691(b); see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(h)(3). Review of orders denying post-trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
187 So. 3d 283, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2967, 2016 WL 764734
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 29, 2016 | Docket: 60254035
Cited 4 times | Published
denial.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.691(b); see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(h)(3). Review of orders denying post-trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
134 So. 3d 1025, 2012 WL 6633860, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21974
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2012 | Docket: 60238998
Cited 4 times | Published
requires written findings.” Id.; see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(h)(3) (“All orders denying post-trial release
Category: Appellate Procedure
59 So. 3d 191, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3199, 2011 WL 799735
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2011 | Docket: 60299625
Cited 4 times | Published
proceedings. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(i).
Reversed and remanded.
Category: Appellate Procedure
50 So. 3d 733, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 20674, 2009 WL 7229247
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2010 | Docket: 2398060
Cited 4 times | Published
withdraw her plea with the trial court. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)c.;[1]see also Hicks v. State
Category: Appellate Procedure
8 So. 3d 393, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1953, 2009 WL 605388
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 2009 | Docket: 1654223
Cited 4 times | Published
to suppress. This court has jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A).
While on patrol in Vero Beach
Category: Appellate Procedure
961 So. 2d 195, 2007 WL 1215217
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2007 | Docket: 468688
Cited 4 times | Published
appeal an adverse ruling of a 3.800(a) motion. Rule 9.140(b)(1)(D) allows defendants to appeal "orders
Category: Appellate Procedure
909 So. 2d 942, 2005 WL 1923389
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 2005 | Docket: 1199192
Cited 4 times | Published
JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(3).
[2] Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(3).
[3] § 924.07(1)(e)
Category: Appellate Procedure
846 So. 2d 1220, 2003 WL 21294885
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2003 | Docket: 1444410
Cited 4 times | Published
mitigate, the appeal is not timely. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(3); Downs v. State, 700 So.2d 789 (Fla.
Category: Appellate Procedure
840 So. 2d 439, 2003 WL 1386646
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2003 | Docket: 2583322
Cited 4 times | Published
permitted to appeal from such an order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1). We agree.
It is well settled that
Category: Appellate Procedure
238 So. 3d 880
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2018 | Docket: 6304066
Cited 3 times | Published
battery, and one
1 We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(h)(4) (providing that the district
court
Category: Appellate Procedure
223 So. 3d 1053, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4390, 2017 WL 1202378
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2017 | Docket: 4667147
Cited 3 times | Published
2d 493 (1967). We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A), (F). We affirm Alex Rodriguez’s
Category: Appellate Procedure
201 So. 3d 847, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15584
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2016 | Docket: 60257105
Cited 3 times | Published
preserved; or
e. as otherwise provided by law.”
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii).
First, we reject the State’s
Category: Appellate Procedure
201 So. 3d 666, 2016 WL 3201036, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8961
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2016 | Docket: 3077257
Cited 3 times | Published
2016) (citing Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.691(c); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(h)(4)).
2
. The jury acquitted
Category: Appellate Procedure
141 So. 3d 229, 2014 WL 2472301, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8385
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 2014 | Docket: 60241826
Cited 3 times | Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(e); see Brannon v. State, 850 So.2d 452
Category: Appellate Procedure
129 So. 3d 446, 2013 WL 6865084, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20726
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2013 | Docket: 60237400
Cited 3 times | Published
enumerated in Rule 9.140(b)(2) (A) (ii) (a)-(e) as well as a “manifest injustice.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(b)-(c);
Category: Appellate Procedure
94 So. 3d 631, 2012 WL 2613556, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10889
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2012 | Docket: 60310920
Cited 3 times | Published
because the State has no remedy by appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c) (listing the orders from which the State
Category: Appellate Procedure
93 So. 3d 371, 2012 WL 2345119, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9996
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2012 | Docket: 60310560
Cited 3 times | Published
by means of a Rule 3.800(b) motion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e) ("A sentencing error may not be raised
Category: Appellate Procedure
134 So. 3d 975, 2012 WL 1109129, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5234
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 2012 | Docket: 60239376
Cited 3 times | Published
dispositive order of the lower tribunal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). An issue is dispositive only
Category: Appellate Procedure
74 So. 3d 158, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18111, 2011 WL 5555836
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2011 | Docket: 2360687
Cited 3 times | Published
preserved for review as trial court error. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(b); see Ross v. State, 848
Category: Appellate Procedure
72 So. 3d 306, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16516, 2011 WL 4953424
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2011 | Docket: 2353370
Cited 3 times | Published
Margarita Perez. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A). The State argues that "[t]he plain
Category: Appellate Procedure
66 So. 3d 350, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10508, 2011 WL 2624431
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2011 | Docket: 2362226
Cited 3 times | Published
whether his sentences were illegal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(d). We affirm in part and reverse
Category: Appellate Procedure
65 So. 3d 107, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10177, 2011 WL 2555398
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2011 | Docket: 60301616
Cited 3 times | Published
after pleading guilty or nolo contendere. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A). However, a defendant will be permitted
Category: Appellate Procedure
35 So. 3d 143, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7027, 2010 WL 2011578
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2010 | Docket: 1645792
Cited 3 times | Published
(4) a sentencing error, if preserved. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a)-(d); Biggs v. State, 24
Category: Appellate Procedure
997 So. 2d 486, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2853
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2008 | Docket: 1377977
Cited 3 times | Published
preserve the error for appellate review. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e)(1).
Accordingly, we affirm Mr. Williams'
Category: Appellate Procedure
991 So. 2d 969, 2008 WL 4224287
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 2008 | Docket: 1725174
Cited 3 times | Published
(2007). This court has jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(L).
Raymond Scriber made an open plea
Category: Appellate Procedure
920 So. 2d 709, 2006 WL 436115
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 2006 | Docket: 1769337
Cited 3 times | Published
to reserve for appeal be dispositive. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). The denial of Sears' motion
Category: Appellate Procedure
904 So. 2d 573, 2005 WL 1383343
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2005 | Docket: 1716465
Cited 3 times | Published
appeal their convictions within 30 days. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(3). Petitions for postconviction relief
Category: Appellate Procedure
892 So. 2d 1183, 2005 WL 264113
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2005 | Docket: 472222
Cited 3 times | Published
924.051(4), 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2004); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). In the instant case, the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
713 So. 2d 1057, 1998 WL 347759
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1998 | Docket: 1450192
Cited 3 times | Published
for a belated appeal of two orders. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j). We grant relief in part and deny relief
Category: Appellate Procedure
691 So. 2d 484, 1997 WL 12935
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1997 | Docket: 1727287
Cited 3 times | Published
we recede and adopt the procedure set forth in Rule 9.140(b) and section 924.06(3), Florida Statutes (1995)
Category: Appellate Procedure
691 So. 2d 484, 1997 WL 12935
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1997 | Docket: 1727287
Cited 3 times | Published
we recede and adopt the procedure set forth in Rule 9.140(b) and section 924.06(3), Florida Statutes (1995)
Category: Appellate Procedure
255 So. 3d 957
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2018 | Docket: 7511594
Cited 2 times | Published
suppress evidence. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). As
explained below, the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
230 So. 3d 886
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2017 | Docket: 6223866
Cited 2 times | Published
verdict. See § 924.07(j), Fla. Stat. (2009); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(E). No double jeopardy issue arises
Category: Appellate Procedure
139 So. 3d 968, 2014 WL 2587716, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8844
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2014 | Docket: 60241255
Cited 2 times | Published
rendition of the order to be reviewed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(3) (requiring that any state criminal
Category: Appellate Procedure
124 So. 3d 953, 2013 WL 5539334, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16014
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2013 | Docket: 60235584
Cited 2 times | Published
the inter*957est of justice.” Id. (citing Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(f), now found at 9.140(i): “In the interest
Category: Appellate Procedure
124 So. 3d 953, 2013 WL 5539334, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16014
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2013 | Docket: 60235584
Cited 2 times | Published
the inter*957est of justice.” Id. (citing Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(f), now found at 9.140(i): “In the interest
Category: Appellate Procedure
111 So. 3d 273, 2013 WL 1629224, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6125
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2013 | Docket: 60230797
Cited 2 times | Published
Stat. (2008-09). We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A). We affirm in part and reverse
Category: Appellate Procedure
110 So. 3d 113, 2013 WL 1194940, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5047
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 2013 | Docket: 60230182
Cited 2 times | Published
See § 924.07(l)(j), Fla. Stat. (2010); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(E); State v. Williams, 742 So.2d 509
Category: Appellate Procedure
110 So. 3d 33, 2013 WL 811478, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3803
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2013 | Docket: 60230276
Cited 2 times | Published
See § 924.07(l)(j), Fla. Stat. (2011); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(E). Upon granting the motion, the
Category: Appellate Procedure
90 So. 3d 902, 2012 WL 2138102, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9596
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2012 | Docket: 60309692
Cited 2 times | Published
dispositive order of the lower tribunal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). An issue is dispositive only
Category: Appellate Procedure
73 So. 3d 364, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17538, 2011 WL 5301608
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 2011 | Docket: 2568701
Cited 2 times | Published
timely invoke the Court's jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
"The operative written order in a
Category: Appellate Procedure
50 So. 3d 744, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19427, 2010 WL 5175520
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2010 | Docket: 1130540
Cited 2 times | Published
probation and sentencing him to prison. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D). The trial court required his counsel
Category: Appellate Procedure
41 So. 3d 1030, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11628, 2010 WL 3059517
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2010 | Docket: 1668251
Cited 2 times | Published
lower tribunals and orders granting a new trial. Rule 9.140(g), which applies to appeals in criminal cases
Category: Appellate Procedure
31 So. 3d 229, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3359, 2010 WL 935479
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2010 | Docket: 2410319
Cited 2 times | Published
section 924.06, Florida Statutes. See also, Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1). "Subdivision (b)(1) lists the only
Category: Appellate Procedure
18 So. 3d 1149, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14083, 2009 WL 3018154
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2009 | Docket: 60251987
Cited 2 times | Published
concealed weapon. This court has jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A) (2008). For the reasons set forth
Category: Appellate Procedure
18 So. 3d 1149, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14083, 2009 WL 3018154
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2009 | Docket: 60251987
Cited 2 times | Published
concealed weapon. This court has jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A) (2008). For the reasons set forth
Category: Appellate Procedure
5 So. 3d 765, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2016, 2009 WL 607495
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 2009 | Docket: 203179
Cited 2 times | Published
motion to correct a sentencing error.[1]See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(d); Jackson v. State, 983 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
4 So. 3d 712, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1485, 2009 WL 436847
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 2009 | Docket: 1666405
Cited 2 times | Published
or gives an incorrect jury instruction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(l)(K).
Category: Appellate Procedure
2 So. 3d 365, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 19374, 2008 WL 5352095
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 2008 | Docket: 248455
Cited 2 times | Published
probation. This court has jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(C).
Appellee, Eric Fulmore, was charged
Category: Appellate Procedure
980 So. 2d 1270, 2008 WL 1987274
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2008 | Docket: 1418310
Cited 2 times | Published
Enrique Lopez. We have jurisdiction, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A), and reverse.
During a valid traffic
Category: Appellate Procedure
983 So. 2d 49, 2008 WL 1958618
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2008 | Docket: 1756416
Cited 2 times | Published
subject matter jurisdiction is appealable. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a). The state contends that
Category: Appellate Procedure
993 So. 2d 540, 2007 WL 3355120
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2007 | Docket: 2556705
Cited 2 times | Published
a dispositive order of the trial court. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). A ruling is dispositive if
Category: Appellate Procedure
948 So. 2d 968, 2007 WL 489231
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2007 | Docket: 1465187
Cited 2 times | Published
We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (2006) (providing that a defendant
Category: Appellate Procedure
915 So. 2d 746, 2005 WL 3331654
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2005 | Docket: 2515600
Cited 2 times | Published
1992).
[2] See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(g); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D).
Category: Appellate Procedure
910 So. 2d 418, 2005 WL 2292027
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2005 | Docket: 1744642
Cited 2 times | Published
1010, 1012 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2). To be timely, a defendant must file
Category: Appellate Procedure
888 So. 2d 730, 2004 WL 2827240
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2004 | Docket: 2563715
Cited 2 times | Published
924.051(4), 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2003); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2). Accordingly, we affirm. Leonard v
Category: Appellate Procedure
883 So. 2d 887, 2004 WL 2191156
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2004 | Docket: 1718303
Cited 2 times | Published
jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 4(b)(1), Fla. Const.; Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). Because we conclude that the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
718 So. 2d 323, 1998 WL 618160
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1998 | Docket: 466212
Cited 2 times | Published
preserved; or
(v) as otherwise provided by law.
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)-(B).
Similarly, effective July
Category: Appellate Procedure
694 So. 2d 855, 1997 WL 295266
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1997 | Docket: 1450797
Cited 2 times | Published
counsel from the trial court to this court. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(1997). We agree with the first district's
Category: Appellate Procedure
266 So. 3d 234
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 2019 | Docket: 14579154
Cited 1 times | Published
plea agreement. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii). We affirm the judgment and
Category: Appellate Procedure
267 So. 3d 463
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2019 | Docket: 8513171
Cited 1 times | Published
Robert Boston. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
The State argues that Mr. Boston
Category: Appellate Procedure
262 So. 3d 859
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2018 | Docket: 8465990
Cited 1 times | Published
So. 2d 475, 478-79 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (“A defendant who pleads guilty
Category: Appellate Procedure
240 So. 3d 120
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2018 | Docket: 64675479
Cited 1 times | Published
Court's jurisdiction in a timely manner. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
241 So. 3d 914
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2018 | Docket: 6309420
Cited 1 times | Published
order suppressing evidence from the trunk, Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(B), but it chose not to—perhaps because
Category: Appellate Procedure
225 So. 3d 319, 2017 WL 3045484, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10411
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 2017 | Docket: 6122328
Cited 1 times | Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b).” Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(e).
A written sentencing order that
Category: Appellate Procedure
208 So. 3d 1208, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 291
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 2017 | Docket: 60294190
Cited 1 times | Published
jeopardy. This Court has jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(e); Holubek v. State, 173 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
203 So. 3d 972, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16438
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 2016 | Docket: 4485678
Cited 1 times | Published
stop. We have jurisdiction.
See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
A trial court’s ruling on
Category: Appellate Procedure
205 So. 3d 782, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13936
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 2016 | Docket: 60257635
Cited 1 times | Published
Fla. Stat. (2014). We have jurisdiction, Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(B), and affirm.
A.L.H. was a passenger
Category: Appellate Procedure
189 So. 3d 1050, 2016 WL 1602132, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6155
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2016 | Docket: 3057066
Cited 1 times | Published
(2018). We have jurisdiction.
See
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A). Because the trial court fundamentally
Category: Appellate Procedure
185 So. 3d 679, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1745, 2016 WL 519907
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2016 | Docket: 3035158
Cited 1 times | Published
motion to withdraw plea.
See
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c). The First District recently
Category: Appellate Procedure
180 So. 3d 235, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18972, 2015 WL 9264083
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2015 | Docket: 60252352
Cited 1 times | Published
days of rendition of the order on appeal. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). A timely motion to withdraw plea
Category: Appellate Procedure
159 So. 3d 293
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2015 | Docket: 2639468
Cited 1 times | Published
*296
II.
We have jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). Ordinarily, this Court reviews
Category: Appellate Procedure
159 So. 3d 293
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2015 | Docket: 2639468
Cited 1 times | Published
*296
II.
We have jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). Ordinarily, this Court reviews
Category: Appellate Procedure
157 So. 3d 481, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1778, 2015 WL 574253
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2015 | Docket: 2633530
Cited 1 times | Published
We have, jurisdiction.
See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D). The trial court erred in denying
Category: Appellate Procedure
156 So. 3d 1116, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1848, 2015 WL 548231
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2015 | Docket: 2633400
Cited 1 times | Published
appeal until a notice of appeal is filed. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(h)(1).
However, a trial court has discretion
Category: Appellate Procedure
157 So. 3d 346, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 609, 2015 WL 248848
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2015 | Docket: 2626273
Cited 1 times | Published
§ 924.07(1)0), Fla. Stat. (2012); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(E);
State v. Green,
Category: Appellate Procedure
146 So. 3d 91, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13391
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2014 | Docket: 1164430
Cited 1 times | Published
thirty (80) days after the record is served. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(g).
Significantly, however, the rule
Category: Appellate Procedure
145 So. 3d 902, 2014 WL 3971544, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12516
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2014 | Docket: 1003008
Cited 1 times | Published
sentencing error, if preserved.
See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii).
He raises a sentencing
Category: Appellate Procedure
149 So. 3d 1146, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9329, 2014 WL 2777693
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2014 | Docket: 60243762
Cited 1 times | Published
judgment of acquittal after jury trial); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(E) (effectuating by procedural rule
Category: Appellate Procedure
135 So. 3d 517, 2014 WL 1255838, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4607
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2014 | Docket: 60239673
Cited 1 times | Published
court’s dispositive suppression ruling. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140.
The defendant maintains that the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
130 So. 3d 757, 2014 WL 258752, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 738
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2014 | Docket: 60237880
Cited 1 times | Published
Stat. (2012). We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)®. Ms. Williams argues that the
Category: Appellate Procedure
124 So. 3d 1046, 2013 WL 5989688, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18003
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2013 | Docket: 60235299
Cited 1 times | Published
trafficking charges. We have jurisdiction, see Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A), (B), and reverse.
Mr. Mitchell
Category: Appellate Procedure
120 So. 3d 641, 2013 WL 4764639, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14319
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 2013 | Docket: 60234176
Cited 1 times | Published
of an order granting such a motion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c) (an order granting a motion under the
Category: Appellate Procedure
114 So. 3d 418, 2013 WL 2359074, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8590
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2013 | Docket: 60231917
Cited 1 times | Published
of such.1 Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i); Foster v. State, 106 So.3d 6, 7 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
102 So. 3d 739, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21517
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2012 | Docket: 60226774
Cited 1 times | Published
in cases 09-CF-13383 and 09-CF-14318. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). We conclude that Mr. Jenkins’
Category: Appellate Procedure
72 So. 3d 290, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16514, 2011 WL 4949811
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2011 | Docket: 2357889
Cited 1 times | Published
3.170(l). The rule governing this appeal is rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c), which provides that one may
Category: Appellate Procedure
62 So. 3d 1236, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8947, 2011 WL 2341397
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2011 | Docket: 2326909
Cited 1 times | Published
voluntarily. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c). "Before accepting a plea
Category: Appellate Procedure
60 So. 3d 560, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6451, 2011 WL 1707210
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 2011 | Docket: 60300280
Cited 1 times | Published
prison sentence imposed on Jason Torres. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(l)(N). It argues that the trial court’s
Category: Appellate Procedure
41 So. 3d 966, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10873, 2010 WL 2926044
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 2010 | Docket: 1668138
Cited 1 times | Published
exception of certain documents not at issue here. Rule 9.140 delineates the procedures for criminal appeals
Category: Appellate Procedure
36 So. 3d 794, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6673, 2010 WL 1930173
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 2010 | Docket: 60294477
Cited 1 times | Published
who shall treat it as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(5)(D).
The circuit court is directed
Category: Appellate Procedure
34 So. 3d 107, 2010 WL 1460222
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2010 | Docket: 116186
Cited 1 times | Published
review.") and cases cited therein; see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e) ("a sentencing error may not be raised
Category: Appellate Procedure
29 So. 3d 1176, 2010 WL 889874
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2010 | Docket: 2583217
Cited 1 times | Published
Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(4)(b).
MONACO, C.J., EVANDER and COHEN,
Category: Appellate Procedure
24 So. 3d 797, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12, 2010 WL 21171
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2010 | Docket: 1648783
Cited 1 times | Published
(4) a sentencing error, if preserved. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a)-(d); see also Robinson v
Category: Appellate Procedure
12 So. 3d 864, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 7440, 2009 WL 1562178
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2009 | Docket: 1646936
Cited 1 times | Published
to preserve it for appellate review. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii). Consequently, we conclude
Category: Appellate Procedure
9 So. 3d 721, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3435, 2009 WL 1066292
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2009 | Docket: 1221878
Cited 1 times | Published
sentencing only upon grounds specified in Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a)-(e)). But, "[c]oercion by
Category: Appellate Procedure
6 So. 3d 106, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2938, 2009 WL 838267
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 2009 | Docket: 1665774
Cited 1 times | Published
(Count IV). This court has jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A).
On the morning of November 5,
Category: Appellate Procedure
4 So. 3d 734, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1537, 2009 WL 485035
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 2009 | Docket: 60295114
Cited 1 times | Published
appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); Thomas v. State, 948 So.2d
Category: Appellate Procedure
1 So. 3d 1257, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1051, 2009 WL 323333
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2009 | Docket: 352480
Cited 1 times | Published
(4) a sentencing error, if preserved. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii).
As such, Espinoza cannot now
Category: Appellate Procedure
993 So. 2d 568, 2008 WL 4643060
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2008 | Docket: 2581167
Cited 1 times | Published
jurisdiction to review this type of order. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140.
Category: Appellate Procedure
992 So. 2d 294, 2008 WL 4265310
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 2008 | Docket: 1723182
Cited 1 times | Published
precludes it from raising the issue now. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e).
The State also challenges the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
982 So. 2d 1277
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2008 | Docket: 2571371
Cited 1 times | Published
DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) ("A defendant who pleads guilty
Category: Appellate Procedure
982 So. 2d 1249, 2008 WL 2219294
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 2008 | Docket: 2557189
Cited 1 times | Published
after his motion to disqualify was denied. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2).
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
Category: Appellate Procedure
967 So. 2d 1008, 2007 WL 3144858
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2007 | Docket: 1397175
Cited 1 times | Published
for rehearing, filed on October 6, 2006. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140. Because the notice of appeal was filed
Category: Appellate Procedure
964 So. 2d 867, 2007 WL 2711241
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 2007 | Docket: 2530278
Cited 1 times | Published
after final judgment in a criminal case. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140.
Category: Appellate Procedure
942 So. 2d 899, 2005 WL 2993843
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2005 | Docket: 1736921
Cited 1 times | Published
from a final judgment. See Fla. R.App. 9.110(g). Rule 9.140, governing criminal appeals, also contains a
Category: Appellate Procedure
866 So. 2d 144, 2004 WL 256487
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2004 | Docket: 1274133
Cited 1 times | Published
for consideration on direct appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e)(2)(2003); see also In re Anders Briefs
Category: Appellate Procedure
830 So. 2d 243, 2002 WL 31507141
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2002 | Docket: 235325
Cited 1 times | Published
raises a colorable claim under rule 3.170(l). Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c)[1]. As such, we hold Hulett
Category: Appellate Procedure
786 So. 2d 24, 2001 WL 420601
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2001 | Docket: 1681939
Cited 1 times | Published
State v. Gaines, 731 So.2d 7 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Rule 9.140 entitled "Appeal Proceedings in Criminal Cases"
Category: Appellate Procedure
769 So. 2d 529, 2000 WL 1595729
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 2000 | Docket: 2515935
Cited 1 times | Published
were true. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin.2060(e); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(2)(F); Hall v. State, 746 So.2d 544 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
733 So. 2d 606, 1999 WL 410334
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1999 | Docket: 11265
Cited 1 times | Published
court's mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
722 So. 2d 838, 1998 WL 765025
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1998 | Docket: 2583579
Cited 1 times | Published
belated appeal in the appellate court. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j); Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2025 | Docket: 71276001
Published
transactions. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(1)(A). We reverse in part 1 because
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2025 | Docket: 71174495
Published
4(b)(1), Fla. Const.; §
924.071, Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). We reverse,
concluding Pastor
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2025 | Docket: 71038918
Published
which we have authority to consider. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(B). The State argues that the law
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2025 | Docket: 70807687
Published
the trial court’s
suppression order. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). It argues that
the warrant was
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 2025 | Docket: 70629869
Published
dismisses this appeal as
untimely. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
OSTERHAUS, C.J., and WINOKUR and
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 2025 | Docket: 70630875
Published
Adams (“Adams”). We have jurisdiction.
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A). For the reasons that follow, we
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2025 | Docket: 70576137
Published
court agreed was case-dispositive. See Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); Churchill v. State, 219 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2025 | Docket: 70454061
Published
dispositive order of the lower tribunal. Fla.
R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). Emerson did not reserve any
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2025 | Docket: 69673940
Published
subject to our independent review. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(g)(2)(A); In re Anders Briefs, 581 So. 2d
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2025 | Docket: 69673940
Published
subject to our independent review. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(g)(2)(A); In re Anders Briefs, 581 So. 2d
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 2025 | Docket: 70411135
Published
suppress. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(B). Law enforcement conducted a valid
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2025 | Docket: 70236134
Published
Gabriel Trevino. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(c)(1)(A); § 924.07(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2022)
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2025 | Docket: 69767009
Published
appeal expired on
November 6, 2019. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3); Gust v. State, 535 So. 2d 642,
643
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2025 | Docket: 69760560
Published
notice” that is timely as to each order); Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(b)(3) (providing time for commencing appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2025 | Docket: 69737679
Published
animal
cruelty. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A). We remand for
the trial court
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2025 | Docket: 69674150
Published
timely appealed. We have jurisdiction. See Fla.
R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(L).
The State argues that
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2025 | Docket: 69631018
Published
appeal followed. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D).
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2025 | Docket: 69574751
Published
following its transmission to this Court. 1 See Fla.
R. App. P. 9.140(f)(1). Citing Florida Rule of Appellate
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2025 | Docket: 69464048
Published
Fla. Stat. (2023).
3
See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A).
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2025 | Docket: 69554643
Published
failed to preserve his claim for
appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)b. (2023). Gore argues
that
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2025 | Docket: 69525635
Published
backpack. The
1
We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (“A defendant
who pleads guilty
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2024 | Docket: 69477033
Published
right to appeal the nonfinal order. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(i).
This appeal follows.
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 2024 | Docket: 69464048
Published
Fla. Stat. (2023).
3
See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A).
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 2024 | Docket: 69420047
Published
suppress. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(B). We accept Howard’s concession
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2024 | Docket: 69378866
Published
double jeopardy. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(M). Because Banda’s offenses did
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2024 | Docket: 69324004
Published
suppress. See § 924.051(4), Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. App. P
9.140(b)(2)(A); see also Le Boss v. State, 359
Category: Appellate Procedure
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 21, 2024 | Docket: 68973334
Published
Argued: Jul 24, 2024
court,
not the appellate court, see FLA. R. APP. P. 9.140(d)(1)(E) (to
USCA11 Case: 22-11903
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 2024 | Docket: 69135344
Published
jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 4(b)(1), Fla. Const.; Fla.
R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(L)–(M).
2 See § 914.22(1), (2)(c)
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2024 | Docket: 68484477
Published
challenge an involuntary plea on appeal. Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)c. (permitting a defendant who
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2024 | Docket: 69063221
Published
of the same judgment, was untimely. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(3) (“The defendant must file the notice
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2024 | Docket: 69025991
Published
for the stop. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
For reasons discussed below,
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2024 | Docket: 68792897
Published
a battery. 1 We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A). Dixon raises four issues on appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2024 | Docket: 68980754
Published
jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 4(b)(1), Fla. Const.; Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(L).
Hanberry was charged with
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 2024 | Docket: 68950669
Published
traffic stop. We have jurisdiction. See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). Aldama contends that the search
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2024 | Docket: 68912873
Published
appointed counsel filed an Anders brief under rule
9.140(g)(2). The brief certified that “undersigned
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2024 | Docket: 68913255
Published
dismisses this appeal as untimely. See Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(b)(3).
LEWIS, NORDBY, and TANENBAUM, JJ
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 2024 | Docket: 68886701
Published
CURIAM.
DISMISSED as untimely. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and TANENBAUM
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2024 | Docket: 68848200
Published
granting or denying
collateral relief."); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(J).
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2024 | Docket: 68272574
Published
April 19, 2024
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.140 from the County Court for
Pinellas County;
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2024 | Docket: 68335132
Published
March 13, 2024
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A), (F) from the Circuit
Court for
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2024 | Docket: 68335464
Published
or (e) as otherwise provided by the law. Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); see also Amendments to Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2024 | Docket: 68313512
Published
community control. We have jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D).
Based on the State’s appropriate
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2024 | Docket: 68277197
Published
would be appealable under the rule. See Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(b)(1)(A), (F). The State also argues that
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2024 | Docket: 68276720
Published
February 23, 2024
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A) from the Circuit Court
for Manatee
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2024 | Docket: 68238241
Published
in juvenile
delinquency cases shall be as in rule 9.140 except as modified by this rule.” Fla. R.
App
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2024 | Docket: 68209010
Published
evidence. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D).
Because the trial court’s conclusions
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2024 | Docket: 68012052
Published
with the clerk of the lower
tribunal.”); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1).
B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and WINOKUR,
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2024 | Docket: 68138398
Published
search warrant.1
We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). Because the trial court
erred
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2023 | Docket: 68103690
Published
Daniel
Arshadnia. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A). The
overarching issue implicated
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2023 | Docket: 68091935
Published
See § 924.07(1)(j), Fla. Stat. (2022); Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(E); see also United States v. Scott
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 2023 | Docket: 68073239
Published
instruction because it is not dispositive. 1 See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (“A defendant who pleads guilty
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2023 | Docket: 68043830
Published
preservation
requirement of rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c)”); Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c) (allowing
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2023 | Docket: 67696340
Published
release. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.691(c); Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(h)(4); Petersen v. State, 187 So. 3d 283
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 2023 | Docket: 68034346
Published
appeals and this Court has jurisdiction.
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D).
We affirm Wells’s conviction
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2023 | Docket: 67557697
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (“A defendant may not
appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2023 | Docket: 67109201
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (“A defendant may not
appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 2023 | Docket: 66795932
Published
any basis for reversal after appealing under Rule 9.140. See
Leonard v. State, 760 So. 2d 114, 119 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2023 | Docket: 67482053
Published
community control. We have jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D).
Because Diaz admitted to violating
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2023 | Docket: 67270637
Published
claim unpreserved for appellate review. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(e) (“A
sentencing error may not be raised
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2023 | Docket: 67012421
Published
assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction. Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140(b)(D). Because the trial court properly
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2023 | Docket: 66833841
Published
Dortch, 317 So. 3d 1074,
1084 (Fla. 2021); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)c. Here, Defendant did
not file
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2022 | Docket: 66575238
Published
We have
jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(h)(4). As the State properly
concedes
Category: Appellate Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2022 | Docket: 65664767
Published
800. Morgan, 293 So. 3d at 1084 (quoting Fla.
R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(J)).
After the Second District
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2022 | Docket: 65382144
Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140(e); see also Jackson v. State, 983 So. 2d
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2022 | Docket: 65365635
Published
of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). See Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140(g)(2)(b).
First, the trial court erred
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2022 | Docket: 65346487
Published
from rendition of a defendant’s sentence.
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). This is jurisdictional. See State
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 2022 | Docket: 64916767
Published
jurisdiction. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.691(c); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(h)(4).
2
Younghans v. State, 90 So. 2d
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2022 | Docket: 64898827
Published
3d 1158, 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); see
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1).
Dismissed.
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2022 | Docket: 64898827
Published
3d 1158, 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); see
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1).
Dismissed.
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2022 | Docket: 63654630
Published
jurisdiction. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(k); Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(C).
2
Woodruff cross-appeals the
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 2021 | Docket: 61574091
Published
Florida Bar.
We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b). Because we find the
trial court’s order
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 2021 | Docket: 59954628
Published
deadly weapon. We have jurisdiction.
See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A); State v. Mackey, 271 So. 3d 128
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 2021 | Docket: 59678194
Published
underlying case. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(B); see also State v. Palmore, 495
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 2021 | Docket: 59678191
Published
1 We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(1)(A). Because Symonette failed to properly
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2021 | Docket: 59295943
Published
deadly weapon. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(1)(A). Baxter argues there was insufficient
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2021 | Docket: 45654210
Published
of the filing of the notice of appeal.
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(f)(1). The rules do not preclude the early
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 2021 | Docket: 31030494
Published
deadly weapon. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(1)(A). Baxter argues there was insufficient
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 2021 | Docket: 29102113
Published
of appeals
authorized by section 924.07(1) or rule 9.140(c)(1). Instead, the State suggests that,
in
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2020 | Docket: 18726906
Published
underlying case. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). The
State argues the trial court
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2020 | Docket: 18642879
Published
jury trial. We
have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A). Kopp argues the trial court
abused
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 2020 | Docket: 18557495
Published
“denying relief” under rule 3.800(a). Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140 (b)(1)(D).
Id.
We agree with the
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2020 | Docket: 18512284
Published
2019) (Makar, J.
dissenting); see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(i) (“In the interest of justice, the
court
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2020 | Docket: 18458088
Published
jurisdiction. Art. V, § 4(b)(1), Fla. Const.; Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D).
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2020 | Docket: 18408687
Published
defendant can appeal from an adverse judgment); Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(1)(A) (appeal), 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (plead
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 2019 | Docket: 16503204
Published
violence (count 2). We
have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A), (F). Counsel filed a brief pursuant
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2019 | Docket: 16338039
Published
1Wehave jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B) (providing that
the state may appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2019 | Docket: 16223265
Published
140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a)-(e) except as provided by law." Rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c)
provides for withdrawal when
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2019 | Docket: 16102231
Published
rule sets forth the same requirements. Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (adding that a defendant who
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2019 | Docket: 16095932
Published
2 See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l); Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)a.-e. (restricting the grounds
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 2019 | Docket: 15948148
Published
relief.
See § 924.066(2), Fla. Stat. (2018); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(J).
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2019 | Docket: 15892174
Published
acquitted. Pettis, 520 So.
2d at 253; See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1) (listing the orders the
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2019 | Docket: 15762813
Published
challenge his
conviction on appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A); see also
Lewis v. State, 262 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2019 | Docket: 15738235
Published
filed June 7, 2019.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(1)(D) from the Circuit Court for
Collier
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2019 | Docket: 15738280
Published
order “denying
relief” under rule 3.800(a). Fla. R. App. P. 9.140 (b)(1)(D).
Here, though the trial court
Category: Appellate Procedure
274 So. 3d 1173
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2019 | Docket: 15738271
Published
right to appeal a dispositive order. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (“A defendant who pleads guilty
Category: Appellate Procedure
273 So. 3d 281
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2019 | Docket: 15733749
Published
particularity the point of law being reserved.”
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); see also § 924.051(4), Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
271 So. 3d 1245
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2019 | Docket: 64714213
Published
Court's jurisdiction in a timely manner. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
271 So. 3d 1245
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2019 | Docket: 64714214
Published
Court's jurisdiction in a timely manner. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2019 | Docket: 15682017
Published
Court’s
jurisdiction in a timely manner. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
270 So. 3d 1287
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2019 | Docket: 15651838
Published
withdraw plea. See
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)c.
3 “[T]he trial judge
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2019 | Docket: 15048662
Published
filed May 3, 2019.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(1)(D) from the Circuit Court for
Manatee
Category: Appellate Procedure
266 So. 3d 880
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2019 | Docket: 64707925
Published
issue was dispositive of the case. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A) (providing that defendant may not
Category: Appellate Procedure
266 So. 3d 880
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2019 | Docket: 64707924
Published
issue was dispositive of the case. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A) (providing that defendant may not
Category: Appellate Procedure
271 So. 3d 128
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2019 | Docket: 14693150
Published
sought within fifteen days of rendition. See Fla.
R. App. P. 9.140(c)(3) (providing that the State shall file
Category: Appellate Procedure
266 So. 3d 238
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2019 | Docket: 14618601
Published
Pettis's car. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
As framed by the trial court's
Category: Appellate Procedure
264 So. 3d 1101
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2019 | Docket: 14554435
Published
plea" and "a sentencing error." Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c), (d). These rules
also
Category: Appellate Procedure
263 So. 3d 291
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2019 | Docket: 14545175
Published
that decision. We have jurisdiction, see Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(C), and we affirm.
The State
Category: Appellate Procedure
264 So. 3d 333
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 2019 | Docket: 14534780
Published
prescribed by the appellate rules, see Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(g)(1) (requiring the initial brief to be
Category: Appellate Procedure
269 So. 3d 580
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2019 | Docket: 14533667
Published
2010); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.170(l); Fla. R.
App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c). “[I]f a defendant’s guilty
Category: Appellate Procedure
264 So. 3d 1055
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2019 | Docket: 64705093
Published
court's order dismissing the information. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A) ("The state may appeal an order
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2018 | Docket: 8449828
Published
and sentence. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(h)(4). In
denying Elias’s motion for post-trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
257 So. 3d 1248
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2018 | Docket: 8439944
Published
denial. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.691 (b); Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(h)(3). The lower court committed reversible
Category: Appellate Procedure
260 So. 3d 440
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2018 | Docket: 64699766
Published
listed in the form used here by Petitioner. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
Clearly, the clerk of court is not
Category: Appellate Procedure
260 So. 3d 440
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2018 | Docket: 64699767
Published
listed in the form used here by Petitioner. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
Clearly, the clerk of court is not
Category: Appellate Procedure
259 So. 3d 907
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2018 | Docket: 8158548
Published
offender of special concern (VFOSC). See Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(d) (providing that a defendant
Category: Appellate Procedure
257 So. 3d 1046
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2018 | Docket: 8074517
Published
defendant’s
argument was not preserved. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(e) (“A sentencing
error may not be raised
Category: Appellate Procedure
255 So. 3d 530
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2018 | Docket: 64689262
Published
Court's jurisdiction in a timely manner. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2018 | Docket: 8034492
Published
Court’s jurisdiction in a
timely manner. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Accordingly, the
appeal is dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
261 So. 3d 649
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2018 | Docket: 8020198
Published
Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(e) ("A
sentencing error may not be
Category: Appellate Procedure
257 So. 3d 540
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2018 | Docket: 7974927
Published
order imposing Appellant’s sentence. See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Furthermore, the record
unquestionably
Category: Appellate Procedure
254 So. 3d 1107
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2018 | Docket: 7775015
Published
order denying his suppression motion. See Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). We affirm.
The pertinent
Category: Appellate Procedure
252 So. 3d 827
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2018 | Docket: 7569510
Published
found was dispositive of the
charges. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i).
Category: Appellate Procedure
246 So. 3d 1303
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2018 | Docket: 64681805
Published
to review the Judgment and Sentence. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2018 | Docket: 7387548
Published
to review the Judgment and Sentence. See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
250 So. 3d 805
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2018 | Docket: 7320154
Published
3d 143, 144 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (citing Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(b)).
However, in this case
Category: Appellate Procedure
245 So. 3d 1022
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2018 | Docket: 64680260
Published
by a defendant in a criminal case. Cf. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1). Appellee's motion is granted, and
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2018 | Docket: 7254066
Published
by a defendant in a
criminal case. Cf. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1). Appellee’s motion is
granted, and
Category: Appellate Procedure
249 So. 3d 759
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2018 | Docket: 64683356
Published
Per Curiam.
*760DISMISSED . See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
Rowe, Kelsey, and Winokur, JJ., concur
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2018 | Docket: 7151434
Published
2018
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
ROWE, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ.,
Category: Appellate Procedure
249 So. 3d 665
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2018 | Docket: 7144571
Published
motion to correct sentencing error. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(e) (“A sentencing error may not be raised
Category: Appellate Procedure
246 So. 3d 1282
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2018 | Docket: 7096599
Published
2
dispositive motion. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). The court
imposed a fifteen-month
Category: Appellate Procedure
248 So. 3d 1226
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2018 | Docket: 7024343
Published
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(3); Miami-Dade County v. Peart, 843 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
243 So. 3d 535
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2018 | Docket: 7024342
Published
correct the sentence in the lower court. See Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(g)(2)(B). Counsel did so, and the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
247 So. 3d 666
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2018 | Docket: 6862842
Published
informations. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A).
Section 458.3265, Florida Statutes
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2018 | Docket: 6368663
Published
DISMISSED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b); Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(3). Any request for belated appeal must
Category: Appellate Procedure
240 So. 3d 903
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2018 | Docket: 64675920
Published
DISMISSED . See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b) ; Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Any request for belated appeal must
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2018 | Docket: 6359023
Published
DISMISSED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b); Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(3). Any request for belated appeal must
Category: Appellate Procedure
241 So. 3d 982
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2018 | Docket: 64677079
Published
DISMISSED . See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b) ; Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Any request for belated appeal must
Category: Appellate Procedure
241 So. 3d 969
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2018 | Docket: 6349197
Published
raising
the issue on direct appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(e) (providing
that a sentencing error may
Category: Appellate Procedure
248 So. 3d 177
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2018 | Docket: 6340879
Published
sale of cocaine. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(1)(A), (F). Appellant's counsel
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2018 | Docket: 6318764
Published
Court’s
jurisdiction in a timely manner. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed
Category: Appellate Procedure
237 So. 3d 1110
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 2018 | Docket: 6250703
Published
this issue on direct appeal. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c) (stating that a defendant
Category: Appellate Procedure
230 So. 3d 1285
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2017 | Docket: 60282822
Published
suspicion. This court has jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). Because the undisputed facts establish
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 2017 | Docket: 6240834
Published
McMahon, 94 So. 3d 468, 472 (Fla. 2012); see Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c) (listing the
same types of orders the
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 2017 | Docket: 6240846
Published
in case number F07-18812 on appeal. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (“A defendant who pleads guilty
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2017 | Docket: 6238218
Published
lascivious conduct. We have
jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A), (F). We affirm his conviction
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2017 | Docket: 6236460
Published
lascivious conduct. We have
jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A), (F). We affirm his conviction
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2017 | Docket: 6236459
Published
relief as to
counts four and five. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D).
Category: Appellate Procedure
229 So. 3d 445
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2017 | Docket: 60281704
Published
PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). WINOKUR, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2017 | Docket: 6217747
Published
Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
WINOKUR, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR
Category: Appellate Procedure
230 So. 3d 580
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2017 | Docket: 6185392
Published
abuse (count 2). We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A), (F). We affirm Mr. Williams’ judgment
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2017 | Docket: 6183869
Published
a sentencing error, if
preserved. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A); Liebman v. State, 853 So.
Category: Appellate Procedure
238 So. 3d 343
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2017 | Docket: 6183862
Published
trial counsel agreed to file one. See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140 cmt. n. (1996 amend.) (“In the rare case
Category: Appellate Procedure
230 So. 3d 510
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2017 | Docket: 6165068
Published
(Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (per curiam); see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); Fla Stat. § 924.051(4) (2015);
Category: Appellate Procedure
230 So. 3d 140
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2017 | Docket: 60282832
Published
-Upon the Court is not an appealable order. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b). Therefore, the Court lacks appellate
Category: Appellate Procedure
230 So. 3d 145
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2017 | Docket: 60282833
Published
to Dismiss is not an appealable order. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b). Therefore, the Court lacks appellate
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2017 | Docket: 6158997
Published
to
Dismiss is not an appealable order. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b). Therefore, the Court
lacks appellate
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2017 | Docket: 6158996
Published
Upon the Court is not an appealable order. Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(b). Therefore, the Court lacks appellate
Category: Appellate Procedure
226 So. 3d 376, 2017 WL 4103218
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 2017 | Docket: 60274332
Published
contest and his sentence is legal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b). However, the judgment contains a scrivener’s
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 2017 | Docket: 6160701
Published
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b). However, the judgment contains a scrivener’s
Category: Appellate Procedure
224 So. 3d 899, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11983, 2017 WL 3613987
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2017 | Docket: 60271783
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); see also Leonard v. State, 760 So.2d 114
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2017 | Docket: 6132936
Published
theft (count 2). We have
jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A), (F). We affirm Mr. Devlin's
Category: Appellate Procedure
229 So. 3d 860
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2017 | Docket: 6070161
Published
88 So.3d 167 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (citing Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3)). This requirement' is jurisdictional
Category: Appellate Procedure
219 So. 3d 911, 2017 WL 1202398, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4371
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2017 | Docket: 4667149
Published
is from the judgment and sentence. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b); Griffith v. Stale, 171 So.2d 597, 598
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2017 | Docket: 4583382
Published
Miranda warnings.1 We have jurisdiction, see Fla. R. App. P.
9.140(c)(1)(A), and reverse.
Category: Appellate Procedure
230 So. 3d 443
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2017 | Docket: 60283031
Published
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pas-co County; Susan G. Barthle
Category: Appellate Procedure
208 So. 3d 1208
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 2017 | Docket: 4571014
Published
jeopardy. This Court has jurisdiction. Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(e); Holubek v. State, 173
Category: Appellate Procedure
206 So. 3d 822, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18458
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2016 | Docket: 4556058
Published
and sentences. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A), (F). We affirm.
Arguments
Category: Appellate Procedure
207 So. 3d 961, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18446
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2016 | Docket: 4556756
Published
stipulated that the order was dispositive. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). Finding that the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
206 So. 3d 123, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17996
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2016 | Docket: 63630784
Published
and disposition. We have jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)©. S.A.W. argues that the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2016 | Docket: 4550695
Published
and disposition. We have
jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). S.A.W. argues that the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
207 So. 3d 340, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17464
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 2016 | Docket: 4544297
Published
the appeal is dismissed.
See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i)
1
;
Williams
Category: Appellate Procedure
205 So. 3d 831, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17235
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2016 | Docket: 60257640
Published
now appeals. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). Because the trial court erred
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2016 | Docket: 4540933
Published
now appeals. We have
jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). Because the trial court erred
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 2016 | Docket: 4422977
Published
Fla. Stat. (2014). We have jurisdiction, Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(B),
and affirm.
A.L
Category: Appellate Procedure
210 So. 3d 101, 2016 WL 4648800, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13369
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2016 | Docket: 4422987
Published
convictions. We have jurisdiction.
See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D). The trial court found Mr. Davis
Category: Appellate Procedure
210 So. 3d 97, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13262
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 2016 | Docket: 4418857
Published
without further comment.
See
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i);
Leonard v. State,
Category: Appellate Procedure
199 So. 3d 357, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12161, 2016 WL 4261970
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 2016 | Docket: 4136149
Published
against Eugene Maye. We have jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). The State argues that the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
198 So. 3d 961, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12036, 2016 WL 4197955
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2016 | Docket: 4118415
Published
criminal contempt. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A). He argues that he was entitled
Category: Appellate Procedure
196 So. 3d 496, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10676, 2016 WL 3702906
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2016 | Docket: 4111804
Published
1
. We have jurisdiction, Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B).
2
. “There are
Category: Appellate Procedure
194 So. 3d 511, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8778, 2016 WL 3186010
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2016 | Docket: 3071049
Published
would have been dispositive of the case. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat (2015)
Category: Appellate Procedure
188 So. 3d 930, 2016 WL 1385894, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5423
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2016 | Docket: 3054130
Published
384 (Fla.1979);
see also
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i).
2
. No testimony
Category: Appellate Procedure
188 So. 3d 913, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6511, 2016 WL 1573942
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2016 | Docket: 3050054
Published
for appeal, we cannot consider the merits. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a)-(d);
see also Rackley
Category: Appellate Procedure
192 So. 3d 495, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2179, 2016 WL 618892
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2016 | Docket: 3036698
Published
credit award was improper.
See
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(l)(M).
Following her arrest on the
Category: Appellate Procedure
185 So. 3d 542, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 362, 2016 WL 104343
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2016 | Docket: 60253596
Published
sentencing. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.710(a); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(2)(A)(ii)d; Hernandez v. State, 137 So.3d
Category: Appellate Procedure
181 So. 3d 574, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19506, 2015 WL 9491820
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2015 | Docket: 60252603
Published
not file a motion to set aside the plea. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c); Hicks v. State, 915 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
179 So. 3d 405, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16977, 2015 WL 7008028
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2015 | Docket: 3011951
Published
e. as otherwise provided by law.
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A) (emphasis added). The Defendant
Category: Appellate Procedure
184 So. 3d 1151, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16724, 2015 WL 6777158
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2015 | Docket: 3010553
Published
theft. We have jurisdiction.
See
Fla. R.. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A). Mr. Walls argues that the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
177 So. 3d 562, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 591, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2416, 2015 WL 6514301
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2015 | Docket: 3008266
Published
entered after final judgment.”
See
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D). We conclude that an order denying
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2015 | Docket: 2991359
Published
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b); S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb,
304 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
176 So. 3d 364
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2015 | Docket: 2991550
Published
appearance, to appellant’s original counsel. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(d)(1) (“The attorney of record for a defendant
Category: Appellate Procedure
176 So. 3d 1010, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15277, 2015 WL 5968725
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2015 | Docket: 60250740
Published
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b); S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
173 So. 3d 1139, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13415, 2015 WL 5559757
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 2015 | Docket: 2757051
Published
See § 924.07(l)(i), Fla. Stat. (2013); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(l)(M).
Category: Appellate Procedure
172 So. 3d 982, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12852, 2015 WL 5051134
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 2015 | Docket: 60250183
Published
motion, and this appeal followed. The State cited rule 9.140(c)(1)(B) of the Florida Rules of Ap*983pellate
Category: Appellate Procedure
174 So. 3d 554, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12875, 2015 WL 5062267
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 2015 | Docket: 2688891
Published
of the record had passed.
See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(f)(1) (requiring service of the record within
Category: Appellate Procedure
171 So. 3d 222, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11801, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1847
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2015 | Docket: 60249695
Published
Certiorari is treated as an appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D).
AFFIRMED.
LAWSON, C.J., SAWAYA
Category: Appellate Procedure
169 So. 3d 1260, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11181, 2015 WL 4486620
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2015 | Docket: 60248844
Published
cannot be challenged on direct appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)©; Garcia-Roque v. State, 120 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
169 So. 3d 264, 2015 WL 4154174
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2015 | Docket: 2679110
Published
the order on the motion.
See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(C).
Reversed and remanded for
Category: Appellate Procedure
164 So. 3d 739, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7721, 2015 WL 2431657
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2015 | Docket: 2659196
Published
robbery. We have jurisdiction.
See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A). The trial court imposed the consecutive
Category: Appellate Procedure
159 So. 3d 1012, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4198, 2015 WL 1319800
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 2015 | Docket: 2644398
Published
1
.
See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(a)(i).
2
.
Category: Appellate Procedure
159 So. 3d 267, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3044, 2015 WL 894349
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2015 | Docket: 2639006
Published
089.” § 924.07(1)(k), Fla. Stat. (2012). Under Rule 9.140(c)(1)(O), the State may appeal an order “denying
Category: Appellate Procedure
159 So. 3d 232, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2155, 2015 WL 685619
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2015 | Docket: 60246520
Published
CURIAM.
DISMISSED without prejudice. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D); see also Saye v. Pieschacon, 750
Category: Appellate Procedure
153 So. 3d 967, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20984, 2014 WL 7404076
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2014 | Docket: 60245383
Published
Court case number 01-2011-CF-004280-A. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D). Upon issuance of mandate in this
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2014 | Docket: 2620073
Published
case number 01-
2011-CF-004280-A. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D). Upon issuance of mandate in
this
Category: Appellate Procedure
150 So. 3d 842, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17600, 2014 WL 5460612
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2014 | Docket: 1453495
Published
this dispositive issue.
See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)®. “The standard of review for motions
Category: Appellate Procedure
149 So. 3d 113
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2014 | Docket: 1310556
Published
denying his motion was not dispositive. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (providing that a defendant
Category: Appellate Procedure
147 So. 3d 1057, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14103, 2014 WL 4435946
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 2014 | Docket: 1185181
Published
Santiago had begun to serve the sentence. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(l)(M), (N). The State did not take an
Category: Appellate Procedure
146 So. 3d 134, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13679, 2014 WL 4344387
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2014 | Docket: 1150535
Published
plea; and a sentencing error, if preserved. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A);
Liebman v. State,
853
Category: Appellate Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2014 | Docket: 742445
Published
and statements. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App.
P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). We reverse the trial court's
Category: Appellate Procedure
141 So. 3d 1278, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11020, 2014 WL 3543910
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2014 | Docket: 60241799
Published
and statements. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). We reverse the trial court’s order
Category: Appellate Procedure
136 So. 3d 1226, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5359, 2014 WL 1400085
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 2014 | Docket: 60239938
Published
Thompson's claim for direct appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii).
Category: Appellate Procedure
135 So. 3d 449, 2014 WL 1051968, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3967
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2014 | Docket: 60239644
Published
and statements. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(B)(l). We reverse the trial court’s order
Category: Appellate Procedure
135 So. 3d 448, 2014 WL 1051966, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3966
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2014 | Docket: 60239642
Published
Rick Menendez. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B). We reverse the trial court’s order
Category: Appellate Procedure
126 So. 3d 1247, 2013 WL 6050854, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18222
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2013 | Docket: 60236281
Published
appeal is hereby dismissed as untimely. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(3). This disposition is without prejudice
Category: Appellate Procedure
124 So. 3d 444, 2013 WL 5932261, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17698
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2013 | Docket: 60235508
Published
prior dispositive trial court order. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). This, Appellant did.
Category: Appellate Procedure
122 So. 3d 426, 2013 WL 5226545, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14803
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 2013 | Docket: 60234686
Published
particularity the point of law being re*427served.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); see also Leonard v. State,
Category: Appellate Procedure
117 So. 3d 447, 2013 WL 3455565, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10938
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2013 | Docket: 60232671
Published
979 So.2d 453, 455 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(G). We reverse, in part, and remand
Category: Appellate Procedure
114 So. 3d 1090, 2013 WL 2501982, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9267
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2013 | Docket: 60231745
Published
State agrees. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A). We affirm Mr. Murphy’s judgment
Category: Appellate Procedure
112 So. 3d 721, 2013 WL 1891336, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7350
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2013 | Docket: 60231238
Published
motion to dismiss the alprazolam charge. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). We reject without further discussion
Category: Appellate Procedure
108 So. 3d 731, 2013 WL 757627, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3286
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 2013 | Docket: 60229222
Published
days of rendition of the sentencing order. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(3) (2011). Where a sentencing order is
Category: Appellate Procedure
104 So. 3d 1180, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20881, 2012 WL 6028838
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2012 | Docket: 60227353
Published
was harmless. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(C), (c)(3). We reverse.
A trial court
Category: Appellate Procedure
96 So. 3d 1057, 2012 WL 3822128, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14740
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2012 | Docket: 60311408
Published
untimely filing of the notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140; Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(h). Because counsel
Category: Appellate Procedure
126 So. 3d 1178, 2012 WL 3711512, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14490
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2012 | Docket: 60236214
Published
decision was made and the reasons therefor.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(h)(3). We remand to the trial court for
Category: Appellate Procedure
96 So. 3d 1039, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14005, 2012 WL 3586927
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2012 | Docket: 60311383
Published
dispositive order of the lower tribunal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i)(2011) (“A defendant may not
Category: Appellate Procedure
95 So. 3d 986, 2012 WL 3588174, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13894
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2012 | Docket: 60311359
Published
order entered after final judgment. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D). Although from this record we cannot
Category: Appellate Procedure
93 So. 3d 417, 2012 WL 2579595, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10810
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2012 | Docket: 60310580
Published
probation, which the state appeals. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(M).
“The standard of review for the
Category: Appellate Procedure
93 So. 3d 361, 2012 WL 1959291, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8816
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2012 | Docket: 60310555
Published
dismiss is not an *362appealable order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b). As the petition fails to allege that
Category: Appellate Procedure
86 So. 3d 562, 2012 WL 1368180, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6178
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2012 | Docket: 60307716
Published
Stat. (2010). We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(M). The State argues that the trial
Category: Appellate Procedure
86 So. 3d 538, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5648, 2012 WL 1232619
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2012 | Docket: 60307705
Published
appealed the dismissal of the charge. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(A).
Generally, when the trial court
Category: Appellate Procedure
81 So. 3d 590, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3353, 2012 WL 669304
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2012 | Docket: 60305959
Published
924.051(4), 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2010); Fla.R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
SAWAYA, PALMER
Category: Appellate Procedure
79 So. 3d 852, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1095, 2012 WL 246465
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2012 | Docket: 2414774
Published
orders are properly before us on appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i).
As we did in Mullis, we affirm
Category: Appellate Procedure
71 So. 3d 933, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16133, 2011 WL 4817314
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2011 | Docket: 2566736
Published
rendition of the judgment and sentence. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(3). The lower tribunal rendered the judgment
Category: Appellate Procedure
82 So. 3d 948, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12209, 2011 WL 3300246
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 2011 | Docket: 60306303
Published
non-appealable order, we do not have jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b). Additionally, pursuant to Florida Rule
Category: Appellate Procedure
61 So. 3d 484, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7569, 2011 WL 2029622
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2011 | Docket: 60300487
Published
dispositive motion to suppress evidence. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). The trial court withheld adjudication
Category: Appellate Procedure
82 So. 3d 824, 2011 WL 1004571, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4141
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2011 | Docket: 60306264
Published
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A).
HAZOURI, MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
82 So. 3d 824, 2011 WL 1004571
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2011 | Docket: 2531496
Published
for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A).
HAZOURI, MAY and CIKLIN, JJ.,
Category: Appellate Procedure
56 So. 3d 51, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 954, 2011 WL 265842
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2011 | Docket: 2582337
Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)." Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(e). See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(b) (permitting
Category: Appellate Procedure
50 So. 3d 738, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19157, 2010 WL 5128135
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2010 | Docket: 60297343
Published
State, 783 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)c. (providing that “[a] defendant
Category: Appellate Procedure
54 So. 3d 508, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19541
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2010 | Docket: 60298298
Published
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2).
MONACO, C.J., TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
54 So. 3d 508, 2010 WL 5288159
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2010 | Docket: 1788207
Published
for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2).
MONACO, C.J., TORPY and EVANDER,
Category: Appellate Procedure
36 So. 3d 833, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7599, 2010 WL 2134102
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2010 | Docket: 60214
Published
statement made during a taped interview. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(B) (permitting appeal by the State
Category: Appellate Procedure
34 So. 3d 107, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4937
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2010 | Docket: 60289974
Published
review.”) and cases cited therein; see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e) (“a sentencing error may not be raised
Category: Appellate Procedure
29 So. 3d 1176, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3550
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2010 | Docket: 60288877
Published
Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(4)(b).
MONACO, C.J., EVANDER and COHEN,
Category: Appellate Procedure
29 So. 3d 1163, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1786, 2010 WL 547174
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2010 | Docket: 60288870
Published
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(3).
KAHN, PADOVANO, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
24 So. 3d 562, 2009 WL 1872339
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2009 | Docket: 1648650
Published
included offense. This Court has jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A) (2007).
Brown was charged by information
Category: Appellate Procedure
20 So. 3d 959, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14928, 2009 WL 3189354
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2009 | Docket: 1177560
Published
3.800(a). This court has jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1).
In November 1997, Alphonso was charged
Category: Appellate Procedure
17 So. 3d 1272, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14257, 2009 WL 3049001
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2009 | Docket: 60249079
Published
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e); see Jackson v. State, 983 So.2d 562
Category: Appellate Procedure
18 So. 3d 615, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6925, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1136
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 2009 | Docket: 60252139
Published
filing a notice of appeal is jurisdictional. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(8). Any delays in filing a notice of
Category: Appellate Procedure
13 So. 3d 108, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5857, 2009 WL 1423999
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2009 | Docket: 1660063
Published
must be filed within fifteen days, see Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(3), or is civil and can be filed within
Category: Appellate Procedure
10 So. 3d 149, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2514, 2009 WL 763484
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 2009 | Docket: 1132811
Published
carefully circumscribed by law and rule. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii). Under this Rule, a defendant
Category: Appellate Procedure
9 So. 3d 40, 2009 WL 559868
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2009 | Docket: 14959
Published
unconstitutional. This Court has jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A) and 9.140(c)(1)(K).
We are unable
Category: Appellate Procedure
994 So. 2d 1191, 2008 WL 4862685
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2008 | Docket: 1666719
Published
probation. This court has jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A).
Brown was charged with throwing
Category: Appellate Procedure
993 So. 2d 97, 2008 WL 4550199
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2008 | Docket: 64856236
Published
State, 959 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b).
BROWNING, C.J., WOLF and BENTON, JJ
Category: Appellate Procedure
994 So. 2d 1169, 2008 WL 4471651
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2008 | Docket: 1130126
Published
the Court's appellate jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby
Category: Appellate Procedure
982 So. 2d 1277, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8412
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2008 | Docket: 64854933
Published
DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)® (“A defendant who pleads guilty
Category: Appellate Procedure
970 So. 2d 371, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16697, 2007 WL 3085379
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2007 | Docket: 64853416
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(a), (b); Combs v. State, 486 So.2d 93, 96 (Fla.1983)
Category: Appellate Procedure
963 So. 2d 317, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 12783, 2007 WL 2330678
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2007 | Docket: 64851905
Published
SAWAYA and MONACO, JJ., concur.
. See Fla. R.App. P.9.140(b)(1)(D).
Category: Appellate Procedure
959 So. 2d 827, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10527, 2007 WL 1946535
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2007 | Docket: 64851439
Published
this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b).
DISMISSED.
BENTON, PADOVANO, and THOMAS
Category: Appellate Procedure
959 So. 2d 800, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9621, 2007 WL 1790758
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2007 | Docket: 64851433
Published
preserved by a motion to withdraw the plea. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(b). Because Lewis did not preserve
Category: Appellate Procedure
955 So. 2d 1227, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7162, 2007 WL 1372629
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2007 | Docket: 64850575
Published
Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e); State v. Hamner, 816 So.2d 810, 812
Category: Appellate Procedure
952 So. 2d 546, 2007 WL 120017
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2007 | Docket: 239010
Published
DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1); Owens v. State, 579 So.2d 311 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
941 So. 2d 464, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18118, 2006 WL 3052627
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2006 | Docket: 64847737
Published
242 So.2d 737, 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); Fla.R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1). To the extent the appellant argues
Category: Appellate Procedure
939 So. 2d 220, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16935, 2006 WL 2872530
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2006 | Docket: 64847178
Published
vacated, and that appellant be discharged. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); Fernandez v. State, 917 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
932 So. 2d 431, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7004, 2006 WL 1331505
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2006 | Docket: 64845556
Published
date of the amendment to Rule 3.800. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(b) (2000); Brannon
Category: Appellate Procedure
920 So. 2d 708, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2564, 2006 WL 436045
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 2006 | Docket: 64842338
Published
“preserved by a motion to withdraw plea.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)b. By abandoning the motion
Category: Appellate Procedure
918 So. 2d 973, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19842, 2005 WL 3750637
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2005 | Docket: 64841834
Published
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(3); McIntosh v. State, 906 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 5th DCA
Category: Appellate Procedure
914 So. 2d 513, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18578, 2005 WL 3116104
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 2005 | Docket: 64840912
Published
review regarding his plea and sentence. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i)-(ii). The trial court conducted
Category: Appellate Procedure
913 So. 2d 1243, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17665, 2005 WL 2990490
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2005 | Docket: 64840832
Published
to appeal was made as to this issue. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). While appellant’s lawyer said
Category: Appellate Procedure
913 So. 2d 730, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17034, 2005 WL 2806329
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2005 | Docket: 64840772
Published
appeal. See § 924.06(3),' Fla. Stat. (2005); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii). See also Eisaman v. *731State
Category: Appellate Procedure
902 So. 2d 889, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8087, 2005 WL 1262103
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2005 | Docket: 64838501
Published
is not an appealable non-final order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1). We, however, treat the notice of
Category: Appellate Procedure
902 So. 2d 889, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8087, 2005 WL 1262103
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2005 | Docket: 64838501
Published
is not an appealable non-final order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1). We, however, treat the notice of
Category: Appellate Procedure
904 So. 2d 505, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7566, 2005 WL 1186313
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2005 | Docket: 64839043
Published
not preserved for appellate review. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e); see also Brannon v. State, 850 So.2d
Category: Appellate Procedure
896 So. 2d 812, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1587, 2005 WL 357001
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2005 | Docket: 64836878
Published
will not be addressed on direct appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e). Therefore, because Williams was convicted
Category: Appellate Procedure
889 So. 2d 220, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19519, 2004 WL 2953316
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2004 | Docket: 64835014
Published
to appeal a prior dispositive order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)®. We affirm without comment.
Foskey
Category: Appellate Procedure
885 So. 2d 967, 2004 WL 2452472
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2004 | Docket: 1286686
Published
Hampton v. State, 680 So.2d 581 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
Rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
Category: Appellate Procedure
887 So. 2d 410, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15587, 2004 WL 2346139
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2004 | Docket: 64834271
Published
review. See § 924.051(4), Fla. Stat. (2003); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A).
Affirmed.
ALTENBERND, C.J, and
Category: Appellate Procedure
881 So. 2d 662, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12493, 2004 WL 1885953
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2004 | Docket: 64832445
Published
motion to correct sentencing error. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A), (e); Williams v. State, 873 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
878 So. 2d 485, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11425, 2004 WL 1736798
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2004 | Docket: 64831998
Published
sentence. See § 924.07(1)(e), Fla. Stat. (2001); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(K). A sentence that does not impose
Category: Appellate Procedure
876 So. 2d 701, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10033, 2004 WL 1637019
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2004 | Docket: 64831377
Published
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Leonard v. State, 760 So.2d 114 (Fla.2000);
Category: Appellate Procedure
884 So. 2d 95, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5252, 2004 WL 813290
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2004 | Docket: 64833427
Published
800(b). See § 924.051, Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(d); Maddox v. State, 760 So
Category: Appellate Procedure
872 So. 2d 286, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 4602, 2004 WL 736504
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2004 | Docket: 64830184
Published
appeal any issue upon his plea of guilty. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A). Therefore, appellant’s second
Category: Appellate Procedure
867 So. 2d 1273, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3732, 2004 WL 574216
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2004 | Docket: 64828894
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979)
Category: Appellate Procedure
866 So. 2d 1278, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3332, 2004 WL 433231
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2004 | Docket: 64828537
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979)
Category: Appellate Procedure
866 So. 2d 741, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1332, 2004 WL 384493
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2004 | Docket: 64828355
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b) (2) (A) (ii); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
866 So. 2d 741, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1332, 2004 WL 384493
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2004 | Docket: 64828355
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b) (2) (A) (ii); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
863 So. 2d 1287, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 626, 2004 WL 135826
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2004 | Docket: 64827599
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979)
Category: Appellate Procedure
858 So. 2d 1118, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16178, 2003 WL 22442991
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2003 | Docket: 64826390
Published
raise those issues on direct appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2) (A) (ii).
GUNTHER, WARNER and MAY
Category: Appellate Procedure
853 So. 2d 1117, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13616, 2003 WL 22082169
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 2003 | Docket: 64824933
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979)
Category: Appellate Procedure
853 So. 2d 576, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13175, 2003 WL 22047845
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2003 | Docket: 64824752
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979)
Category: Appellate Procedure
845 So. 2d 236, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4882, 2003 WL 1856414
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 2003 | Docket: 64822823
Published
procedure. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(B); McCray, 699 So.2d at 1367-68. Rule 9.140(j)(3)(B) is the
Category: Appellate Procedure
840 So. 2d 371, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3252, 2003 WL 1088429
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2003 | Docket: 64821329
Published
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(1).
DISMISSED.
VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON
Category: Appellate Procedure
839 So. 2d 839, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2577, 2003 WL 729014
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2003 | Docket: 64821226
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979)
Category: Appellate Procedure
833 So. 2d 870, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14, 2003 WL 18396
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 2003 | Docket: 64819769
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979)
Category: Appellate Procedure
835 So. 2d 1185, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19228, 2002 WL 31875022
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2002 | Docket: 64820158
Published
ground. See § 924.051(4), Fla. Stat. (2001); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(I); Leonard v. State, 760 So.2d
Category: Appellate Procedure
831 So. 2d 1267, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19046, 2002 WL 31828791
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2002 | Docket: 64819399
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979)
Category: Appellate Procedure
833 So. 2d 182, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17811, 2002 WL 31728416
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2002 | Docket: 64819588
Published
specifically reserves the right to same. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b); § 924.06(3) Fla. Stat. (2000). See also
Category: Appellate Procedure
828 So. 2d 1040, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14585, 2002 WL 31255525
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2002 | Docket: 64818439
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979)
Category: Appellate Procedure
815 So. 2d 789, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6596, 2002 WL 985535
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 2002 | Docket: 64814897
Published
for review on direct appeal. See generally Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2); §§ 924.051(4), .06(3), Fla. Stat
Category: Appellate Procedure
813 So. 2d 1073, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5169, 2002 WL 662726
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2002 | Docket: 64814359
Published
with his plea agreement, we affirm. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A); § 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (2000)
Category: Appellate Procedure
802 So. 2d 418, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17103, 2001 WL 1543159
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2001 | Docket: 64810988
Published
granting a new trial, as was its right. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(C). Pursuant to this court’s internal
Category: Appellate Procedure
795 So. 2d 264, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13585, 2001 WL 1148934
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2001 | Docket: 64808815
Published
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000);
Category: Appellate Procedure
793 So. 2d 115, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11511, 2001 WL 930015
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2001 | Docket: 64807960
Published
other fundamental issue, we must affirm. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Harriel v. State, 710 So.2d
Category: Appellate Procedure
789 So. 2d 517, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9710, 2001 WL 789085
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2001 | Docket: 64806723
Published
petition for belated appeal pursuant to Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j). See Funchess v. Moore, 766 So.2d 348
Category: Appellate Procedure
786 So. 2d 24, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5560
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2001 | Docket: 64805660
Published
State v. Gaines, 731 So.2d 7 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Rule 9.140 entitled “Appeal Proceedings in Criminal Cases”
Category: Appellate Procedure
777 So. 2d 1218, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2124, 2001 WL 193849
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2001 | Docket: 64803653
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
778 So. 2d 464, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1753, 2001 WL 137353
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2001 | Docket: 64803780
Published
for treatment as a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If the appellant qualifies for
Category: Appellate Procedure
776 So. 2d 1031, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 795, 2001 WL 76307
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2001 | Docket: 64803374
Published
See Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(c)(4)(A) (formerly Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)(3)(A)).
BOOTH, DAVIS and POLSTON, JJ.
Category: Appellate Procedure
775 So. 2d 419, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 73, 2001 WL 10230
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2001 | Docket: 64802972
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
774 So. 2d 939, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 74, 2001 WL 9948
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2001 | Docket: 64802793
Published
court’s mandate as the notice ~ of appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)(6)(D).
PETITION GRANTED.
ERVIN, BOOTH
Category: Appellate Procedure
773 So. 2d 658, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16832, 2000 WL 1867508
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2000 | Docket: 64802450
Published
court for treatment as a notice of appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
774 So. 2d 808, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16834, 2000 WL 1867523
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2000 | Docket: 64802760
Published
for treatment as a notice of appeal. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
ALLEN, BENTON and BROWNING, JJ
Category: Appellate Procedure
772 So. 2d 635, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16608, 2000 WL 1853916
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2000 | Docket: 64802112
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)(3)(B).
LAWRENCE, DAVIS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
772 So. 2d 604, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15913, 2000 WL 1780760
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2000 | Docket: 64802081
Published
tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
BARFIELD, C.J., ERVIN and WOLF
Category: Appellate Procedure
771 So. 2d 1291, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16153, 2000 WL 1808968
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2000 | Docket: 64801925
Published
decision was made and the reasons therefor.” Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g)(3). We remand to the trial court for a
Category: Appellate Procedure
774 So. 2d 40, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13191, 2000 WL 1505000
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2000 | Docket: 64802638
Published
judgment of acquittal after a jury verdict, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(E), or may cross-appeal a question
Category: Appellate Procedure
768 So. 2d 1210, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12666, 2000 WL 1459695
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2000 | Docket: 64800891
Published
court for treatment as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
WOLF, DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ„
Category: Appellate Procedure
768 So. 2d 1210, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12666, 2000 WL 1459695
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2000 | Docket: 64800891
Published
court for treatment as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
WOLF, DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ„
Category: Appellate Procedure
768 So. 2d 1208, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12620, 2000 WL 1434681
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2000 | Docket: 64800889
Published
counsel for the appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(5)(iii)-(v). Rule 9.140(b)(5) nowhere suggests that
Category: Appellate Procedure
767 So. 2d 1249, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11793, 2000 WL 1298838
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 2000 | Docket: 64800628
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(A).
WEBSTER, PADOVANO and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
767 So. 2d 607, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11698, 2000 WL 1283795
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2000 | Docket: 64800497
Published
the circuit court appellate division. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)(3); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.670; Robinson v
Category: Appellate Procedure
765 So. 2d 306, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11213, 2000 WL 1234285
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2000 | Docket: 64799732
Published
tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
764 So. 2d 941, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10998, 2000 WL 1224703
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2000 | Docket: 64799541
Published
tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
766 So. 2d 391, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10167, 2000 WL 1114682
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 2000 | Docket: 64800179
Published
court to be treated as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(jX5)(D).
BOOTH, LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ
Category: Appellate Procedure
764 So. 2d 839, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10192, 2000 WL 1087534
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2000 | Docket: 64799478
Published
court to be treated as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
BOOTH, LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ
Category: Appellate Procedure
763 So. 2d 1265, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8778, 2000 WL 955612
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2000 | Docket: 64799273
Published
for treatment as a notice of appeal. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)(5)(B). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
761 So. 2d 495, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8525, 2000 WL 905007
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2000 | Docket: 64798375
Published
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d); Bertolotti v. Dugger, 514 So.2d 1095, 1096 (Fla.1987);
Category: Appellate Procedure
761 So. 2d 495, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8525, 2000 WL 905007
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2000 | Docket: 64798375
Published
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d); Bertolotti v. Dugger, 514 So.2d 1095, 1096 (Fla.1987);
Category: Appellate Procedure
758 So. 2d 1276, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6873, 2000 WL 726516
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2000 | Docket: 64797618
Published
1999); see also § 985.234, Fla. Stat. (1999); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(m) and 9.145.
DISMISSED.
KLEIN
Category: Appellate Procedure
763 So. 2d 1220, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6636, 2000 WL 702239
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2000 | Docket: 64799233
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j) (3) (A).
ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., concur
Category: Appellate Procedure
757 So. 2d 1260, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5796, 2000 WL 628717
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 2000 | Docket: 64797297
Published
sentence for violation of probation. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j).
GUNTHER, STONE, and POLEN, JJ., concur
Category: Appellate Procedure
765 So. 2d 98, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5772, 2000 WL 628015
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 2000 | Docket: 64799656
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
765 So. 2d 101, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5761, 2000 WL 628014
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 2000 | Docket: 64799660
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
757 So. 2d 588, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5504, 2000 WL 560266
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2000 | Docket: 64797174
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(B).
JOANOS, LAWRENCE and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
765 So. 2d 90, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5503, 2000 WL 560319
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2000 | Docket: 64799645
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(B).
JOANOS, LAWRENCE and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
755 So. 2d 833, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5200, 2000 WL 553959
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 2000 | Docket: 64796803
Published
review by a motion to withdraw the plea. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(ii); Harriel v. State, 710 So.2d
Category: Appellate Procedure
756 So. 2d 261, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5249, 2000 WL 525607
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2000 | Docket: 64796939
Published
does not conclusively refute his claim, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i), we reverse and remand for an evidentiary
Category: Appellate Procedure
756 So. 2d 1090, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5157, 2000 WL 526818
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 2000 | Docket: 64797054
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
WOLF, KAHN and LAWRENCE, JJ.,
Category: Appellate Procedure
756 So. 2d 1090, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5157, 2000 WL 526818
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 2000 | Docket: 64797054
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
WOLF, KAHN and LAWRENCE, JJ.,
Category: Appellate Procedure
756 So. 2d 1034, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3551, 2000 WL 305140
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2000 | Docket: 64797032
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(A).
JOANOS, MINER and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
752 So. 2d 1258, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2634, 2000 WL 266309
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2000 | Docket: 64795739
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(B).
ERVIN, BOOTH and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
753 So. 2d 144, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1327, 2000 WL 158605
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2000 | Docket: 64795786
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(B).
MINER, WOLF and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
750 So. 2d 727, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 449, 2000 WL 51891
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2000 | Docket: 64794741
Published
court’s mandate as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed
Category: Appellate Procedure
747 So. 2d 1072, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 344, 2000 WL 35865
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2000 | Docket: 64793601
Published
remand the cause for an evidentiary hearing. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(f).
Reversed and remanded.
Category: Appellate Procedure
750 So. 2d 127, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 346, 2000 WL 35864
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2000 | Docket: 64794511
Published
for treatment as a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(6)(B).
ERVIN, DAVIS and PADOVANO, JJ
Category: Appellate Procedure
746 So. 2d 1206, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16847, 1999 WL 1191462
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1999 | Docket: 64792970
Published
court. § 924.051(3), Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla. R.Crim. P. 9.140(d).
STONE, POLEN, and STEVENSON, JJ., concur
Category: Appellate Procedure
745 So. 2d 540, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16482, 1999 WL 1112516
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1999 | Docket: 64792495
Published
to consider a claim for a belated appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(l) (requiring petitions seeking belated
Category: Appellate Procedure
744 So. 2d 592, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15217, 1999 WL 1037833
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1999 | Docket: 64792101
Published
Beginning in January 1997, the effective date of Rule 9.140® and the return of jurisdiction to district courts
Category: Appellate Procedure
745 So. 2d 1060, 1999 WL 1014933
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1999 | Docket: 1294865
Published
and also implemented a two year time limit but rule 9.140(j)(3)(C) provides that "[t]ime periods under
Category: Appellate Procedure
745 So. 2d 1049, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14317, 1999 WL 979179
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1999 | Docket: 64792676
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(A).
ANTOON, C.J., W. SHARP, and HARRIS, JJ., concur
Category: Appellate Procedure
743 So. 2d 1182, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14144, 1999 WL 973584
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1999 | Docket: 64791926
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(B).
JOANOS, LAWRENCE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
735 So. 2d 615, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9528, 1999 WL 533602
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1999 | Docket: 64788920
Published
treat this order as a notice of appeal. See, Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).
PETERSON, J., concurs.
GRIFFIN
Category: Appellate Procedure
737 So. 2d 587, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8544, 1999 WL 420448
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1999 | Docket: 64789446
Published
his argument.
To obtain a belated appeal under Rule 9.140(j), the petition must allege that petitioner
Category: Appellate Procedure
737 So. 2d 559, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6496, 1999 WL 313267
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1999 | Docket: 64789432
Published
preserved; or
(v) as otherwise provided by law.
Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B). See also Robinson v. State, 373
Category: Appellate Procedure
732 So. 2d 1206, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6409, 1999 WL 312253
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1999 | Docket: 64788317
Published
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j)(3)(A).
DAVIS, BENTON and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Category: Appellate Procedure
723 So. 2d 365, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 16292, 1998 WL 896403
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1998 | Docket: 64785109
Published
request because it lacked jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j). However, we treated the request as a
Category: Appellate Procedure
719 So. 2d 38, 1998 WL 646595
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1998 | Docket: 1704932
Published
appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(3) (defendant wishing to appeal "a final
Category: Appellate Procedure
714 So. 2d 526, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 6660, 1998 WL 307493
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1998 | Docket: 64781847
Published
in part and denied in part Fedor’s motion. See Rule 9.140(e)(1)(B), Fla. R.App. P.; §§ 924.07, 071, Fla
Category: Appellate Procedure
710 So. 2d 743, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5579, 1998 WL 251467
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 1998 | Docket: 64780877
Published
Procedure, 685 So.2d 773 (Fla.1996). See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(j)(l), (petitions seeking belated appeal
Category: Appellate Procedure
701 So. 2d 1233, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13361, 1997 WL 741168
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1997 | Docket: 64777018
Published
received the order.
There is no such requirement in rule 9.140(j), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, the
Category: Appellate Procedure
695 So. 2d 923, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7195, 1997 WL 346071
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1997 | Docket: 64774383
Published
court denied the motion and this appeal ensued.
Rule 9.140 of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure provides
Category: Appellate Procedure
693 So. 2d 141, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5405, 1997 WL 255309
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 1997 | Docket: 64773360
Published
express reservation of his right to appeal. Fla. R.Crim. P. 9.140(b); Jones v. State, 636 So.2d 835 (Fla.
Category: Appellate Procedure
600 So. 2d 46, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7241
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1992 | Docket: 64667908
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).
Category: Appellate Procedure