Date Filed |
Document # |
Attachment # |
Short Description |
Long Description |
Upload date |
SHA1 hash |
2012-06-18 |
1 |
0 |
Complaint - (Discovery) |
|
|
|
2012-06-18 |
2 |
0 |
Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties |
|
|
|
2012-06-18 |
3 |
0 |
Report on Filing of Copyright Action (Initial Notification) |
|
|
|
2012-06-18 |
4 |
0 |
Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) |
|
|
|
2012-06-22 |
5 |
0 |
Ex Parte Applicaton for Leave re Discovery re Discovery |
|
|
|
2012-06-27 |
6 |
0 |
Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held |
|
|
|
2012-07-05 |
7 |
0 |
Order on Ex Parte Application for Leave re Discovery Matter |
|
|
|
2012-07-19 |
8 |
0 |
Order to Show Cause |
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The parties are ordered to show cause, in writing of no more than five pages, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction over the John Doe Defendants. Submissions shall be f iled no later than August 2, 2012. In light of thecourts jurisdictional concerns, the order allowing for the issuance of Rule 45 subpoenas prior to the Rule 26(f) schedule conference (Dkt. No. 7) is VACATED until such time as the court resolves the jurisdictional issue. (lc) Modified on 7/19/2012 (lc). |
2012-07-20 02:15:44 |
056c7f028df893800661f92ebac30b1854f8279f |
2012-08-02 |
9 |
0 |
Response (non-motion) |
|
|
|
2012-08-15 |
10 |
0 |
Notice of Related Case(s) |
|
|
|
2012-08-21 |
11 |
0 |
Transferring Case purs GO 08-05 (Related Case (CV 34) |
|
|
|
2012-09-14 |
12 |
0 |
Motion to Quash Subpoena |
|
|
|
2012-09-14 |
13 |
0 |
Request for Order re Discovery Matter |
|
|
|
2012-09-18 |
14 |
0 |
Order on Request for Order re Discovery Matter |
|
|
|
2012-09-26 |
15 |
0 |
Response in Opposition to Motion |
|
|
|
2012-09-28 |
16 |
0 |
Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held |
|
|
|
2012-10-02 |
17 |
0 |
Reply (Motion related) |
|
|
|
2012-10-03 |
18 |
0 |
Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held |
|
|
|
2013-01-04 |
21 |
0 |
|
(In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge James V. Selna. The Court ORDERS plaintiff(s) to Show Cause in writing no later than January 17, 2013 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause (OSC), on or before the above date: Proof of service of summons and complaint. (See document for further details.) (rla) |
2013-01-04 07:09:41 |
2c278c442a840724eebc93b74f98699766d7034f |