Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 943.32 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 943.32 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 943.32

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 943
DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 943.32
943.32 Statewide criminal analysis laboratory system.There is established a statewide criminal analysis laboratory system to be composed of:
(1) The state-operated laboratories under the jurisdiction of the Department of Law Enforcement in Ft. Myers, Jacksonville, Pensacola, Orlando, Tallahassee, Tampa, and such other areas of the state as may be necessary;
(2) The existing locally funded laboratories in Broward, Indian River, Miami-Dade, Palm Beach, and Pinellas Counties, specifically designated in s. 943.35 to be eligible for state matching funds; and
(3) Such other laboratories as render criminal analysis laboratory services to criminal justice agencies in the state.
History.s. 2, ch. 74-362; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 2, ch. 78-347; s. 1, ch. 84-22; s. 1, ch. 87-159; s. 2, ch. 88-324; s. 169, ch. 2008-4; s. 8, ch. 2010-62.

F.S. 943.32 on Google Scholar

F.S. 943.32 on Casetext

Amendments to 943.32


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 943.32
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 943.32.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

STOKELING, v. UNITED STATES., 139 S. Ct. 544 (U.S. 2019)

. . . . § 943.32(2) (2005); Wyo. Stat. . . .

UNITED STATES v. PEREIRA- GOMEZ,, 903 F.3d 155 (2nd Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 943.32(1) ("from the person or presence of the owner"). See, e.g. , 3 Wayne R. . . .

De A. CROSS, v. UNITED STATES v., 892 F.3d 288 (7th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 943.32(1). . . . Given this authoritative interpretation of Wisconsin law, section 943.32(1) does not trigger the elements . . .

UNITED STATES v. WYCHE,, 266 F. Supp. 3d 885 (E.D. Va. 2017)

. . . . § 943.32(1): Whoever, with intent to steal, takes proper from the person or presence of the owner by . . .

UNITED STATES v. TOWNSEND, a k a, 224 F. Supp. 3d 816 (D. Minn. 2016)

. . . . § 943.32(1) (2004). . . . Stat. § 943.32(2) (2004) (emphasis added). . . . Stat. § 943.32(2). . . . Stat. § 943.32(2) is whether the victim reasonably believed that he or she was threatened with a dangerous . . .

STEWART, v. UNITED STATES, 191 F. Supp. 3d 923 (E.D. Wis. 2016)

. . . . § 943.32 still qualifies as a “violent felony” after the Supreme Court’s decision Samuel Johnson v. . . . Stat. § 943.32 no longer qualifies as a “violent felony,” defined as any crime punishable by imprisonment . . . I therefore turn to the Wisconsin supreme court’s construction of § 943.32. . . . Stat. § 943.32, which does. Id. . . . Stat. § 943.32 does not categorically qualify as a violent felony under the force clause. . . .

ROBINSON, v. UNITED STATES, 188 F. Supp. 3d 857 (E.D. Wis. 2016)

. . . . § 943.32 still qualifies as a “violent felony” under the federal Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”) . . . Stat. § 943.32 as construed by the Wisconsin supreme court qualifies under the AC'CA’s force clause as . . . I therefore turn to the Wisconsin supreme court’s construction of § 943.32. . . . Stat. § 943.32, which does. Id. . . . Stat. § 943.32 does not categorically qualify as a violent felony under the force clause. . . .

UNITED STATES v. D. J. H., 179 F. Supp. 3d 866 (E.D. Wis. 2016)

. . . . §§ 943.32(2) and 939.50. (Docket # 13 at 18). . . . . § 943.32(2); cf. . . . Stat. § 943.32(2) states, Armed robbery, as' defined in § 943.32(2) ... is committed by one who, with . . . Stat. § 943.32(2). Indeed, neither of the parties argue that Wis. . . . . § 943.32(2) fails to satisfy the force clause. . . .

UNITED STATES v. S. ROGERS,, 179 F. Supp. 3d 881 (E.D. Wis. 2016)

. . . . §§ 943.32(2) and 939.05. (Docket #6 at 2). . . . Stat. § 943.32(2), which corresponds to Armed Robbery with'Threat of Force. (Docket #52 at 7 n.3). . . . Stat. §§ 943.32(2), 939.05. . . . Stats. §§ 943.32(2) and 939.05, respectively. (Docket #52 at 7). . . . Stats. §§ 943.32(2), satisfies the force clause of Section 5032. . . . Stat. § 943.32 (emphasis added). In addition, Wisconsin’s PTAC statute, Wis. . . . . § 943.32(2); cf. . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. S. R. a, 81 F. Supp. 3d 709 (E.D. Wis. 2015)

. . . adjudication was for Armed Robbery with Threat of Force-Party to a Crime, pursuant to Wisconsin Statutes §§ 943.32 . . .

UNITED STATES v. WEBSTER,, 528 F. App'x 648 (7th Cir. 2013)

. . . Stat. 943.32(2), and sentenced to 24 months’ imprisonment. See State v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BEASON,, 493 F. App'x 747 (7th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 943.32(1); United States v. Otero, 495 F.3d 393, 401 & n. 3 (7th Cir.2007). . . . Stat. § 943.32(2), and apparently the government offered none of the sources the court could use, consistently . . .

UNITED STATES v. MOLINARO A., 428 F. App'x 649 (7th Cir. 2011)

. . . . §§ 943.32(l)(b), (2), 939.32. . . .

T. GREENE, v. POLLARD,, 677 F. Supp. 2d 1073 (W.D. Wis. 2009)

. . . . § 943.32(2), all as a party to the crime and as a habitual offender. Dkt. 12, Exh. A. . . .

UNITED STATES v. D. ALEXANDER,, 355 F. App'x 71 (7th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 943.32(l)(b), (2). . . .

UNITED STATE v. GARCIA- CARAVEO,, 586 F.3d 1230 (10th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 943.32(l)(a); State v. Kvale, 302 N.W.2d 650, 652-53 (Minn.1981); State v. . . .

W. WARFIELD, v. GRAMS,, 341 F. App'x 227 (7th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 943.32(2), child abuse, id. § 948.03(2)(b), kidnapping, id. § 940.31(l)(b), and seven counts of hostage-taking . . .

A. SMITH, v. GRAMS,, 565 F.3d 1037 (7th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 943.32(1)(a)-(2). . . .

UNITED STATES v. OTERO, 495 F.3d 393 (7th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 943.32(l)(a), which has as a necessary element the use of force against a victim. . . . Under Wisconsin Statute § 943.32, “(1) Whoever, with intent to steal, takes property from the person . . .

UNITED STATES v. SANTIESTEBAN- HERNANDEZ,, 469 F.3d 376 (5th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 943.32 (West 2005). . . .

G. TAYLOR, v. BRADLEY,, 448 F.3d 942 (7th Cir. 2006)

. . . . §§ 943.32(l)(a) and 939.05, for an armed robbery that occurred on August 6, 1999 at Rena and Steven . . .

R. MCCLOUD, v. DEPPISCH,, 409 F.3d 869 (7th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 943.32(1)(a). . . .

D. LOSEY, v. FRANK,, 268 F. Supp. 2d 1066 (E.D. Wis. 2003)

. . . . § 943.32(2) as robbery “by use or threat of use of a dangerous weapon”), and being a felon in possession . . . Stat. § 943.32(2). Thus, the statute permits the state to prove armed robbery in a number of ways. . . .

R. PERRY, v. R. McCAUGHTRY,, 308 F.3d 682 (7th Cir. 2002)

. . . . §§ 943.32(l)(a) and 939.05. . . .

D. CLAPPER, v. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 946 F. Supp. 672 (E.D. Wis. 1996)

. . . . § 943.32(1)(B). (Rogers Aff., Exh. A at 5). . . .

R. FOSTER, v. McCAUGHTRY,, 792 F. Supp. 1147 (E.D. Wis. 1992)

. . . robbery as a party to the crime, enhanced by concealment of identity, in violation of sections 939.05, 943.32 . . .

G. SOLLES, v. R. ISRAEL,, 868 F.2d 242 (7th Cir. 1989)

. . . . §§ 940.02, 943.32(l)(a) and (2), and 946.62. . . .

COLE, v. YOUNG,, 817 F.2d 412 (7th Cir. 1987)

. . . . §§ 939.50 and 943.32(2) allows a maximum sentence of 20 years; aggravated battery under § 940.19(lm . . . . § 940.02, armed robbery, § 943.32(2), first degree sexual assault, § 940.225, and kidnapping, § 940.31 . . .

KAZEE, v. YOUNG,, 621 F. Supp. 577 (W.D. Wis. 1985)

. . . . § 943.32(1)(b), and one count of habitual criminality, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 939.62. . . .

W. WEBER, v. ISRAEL,, 730 F.2d 499 (7th Cir. 1984)

. . . . §§ 943.32(l)(b), (2) and 939.05. . . .

J. FEELA, v. ISRAEL SABIN, v. ISRAEL, 727 F.2d 151 (7th Cir. 1984)

. . . . §§ 943.32 & 946.62 (West 1982)), attempted first degree murder (Wis.Stat.Ann. §§ 940.01, 939.32, 946.62 . . . 1982)) and conspiracy to commit armed robbery of the Bancroft State Bank (Wis.Stat.Ann. §§ 939.31 & 943.32 . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. MIRELES, FR XXX- XX- XXXX, 17 M.J. 781 (A.F.C.M.R. 1983)

. . . State, 85 Wis.2d 558, 271 N.W.2d 105 (1978), interpreting W.S. 943.32, 943.38; Mayes v. . . .

RHODEN, v. ISRAEL, C. La, 574 F. Supp. 61 (E.D. Wis. 1983)

. . . . §§ 943.32(l)(b), (2) and 939.05. . . . Stat. §§ 939.50, 943.32(l)(b) and (2). . . .

ARGIZ, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION,, 704 F.2d 384 (7th Cir. 1983)

. . . . § 943.32(l)(b). . . .

VOGEL, v. PERCY,, 691 F.2d 843 (7th Cir. 1982)

. . . subsequently was charged as a party to the crime of armed robbery in violation of Wisconsin Statutes §§ 943.32 . . .

ALICEA, v. R. GAGNON,, 675 F.2d 913 (7th Cir. 1982)

. . . . §§ 943.32(l)(b), 943.-32(2), & 946.62 (1977). . . .

RUSS, v. ISRAEL,, 531 F. Supp. 490 (E.D. Wis. 1982)

. . . . §§ 943.32(1)(b), (2) and 939.05. Judgment of conviction was entered on September 8, 1978. . . .

BYRD, v. R. ISRAEL,, 513 F. Supp. 1077 (E.D. Wis. 1981)

. . . it less likely that he would be identified with said crime, contrary to Wisconsin Statutes sections 943.32 . . . I Wis.Stats. § 943.32 defines robbery in the following manner: “(1) Whoever, with intent to steal, takes . . . armed robbery because Susan Dulak was not the “owner” of the property stolen within the meaning of § 943.32 . . . in Wisconsin that when the information contains a citation to the statute allegedly violated, here § 943.32 . . .

HARRIS, v. CLUSEN,, 487 F. Supp. 616 (E.D. Wis. 1980)

. . . was convicted in Milwaukee County Circuit Court on July 23,1976, of armed robbery, in violation of § 943.32 . . . The maximum sentence for armed robbery in Wisconsin is thirty years, § 943.32(2), Wis.Stats., and petitioner . . .

DICKENSON, v. R. ISRAEL, 482 F. Supp. 1223 (E.D. Wis. 1980)

. . . On January 28, 1975, petitioner was convicted of armed robbery in violation of § 943.32(l)(a) and (b) . . .

SCARBROUGH, v. GAGNON,, 480 F. Supp. 292 (E.D. Wis. 1979)

. . . Petitioner Clyde James Scarbrough challenges his state court conviction for robbery contrary to § 943.32 . . . the completion of testimony, the jury retired and found petitioner guilty of robbery, contrary to § 943.32 . . .

MADDEN, v. ISRAEL,, 478 F. Supp. 1234 (E.D. Wis. 1979)

. . . Stats., and one count of armed robbery of an individual, in violation of §§ 943.32(l)(a) and (2) and . . . Stats., and one count of armed robbery in violation of §§ 943.32(l)(a) and 939.05(2), Wis.Stats. . . .

E. JONES, v. STATE OF WISCONSIN,, 422 F. Supp. 1148 (E.D. Wis. 1976)

. . . arraigned and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge of armed robbery (masked) in violation of §§ 943.32 . . .

E. BRINKMAN, v. Dr. F. SCHUBERT, STREETER, v. CARBALLO, L. WILLIAMS, v. GRAY, HARRIS, a k a v. L. GRAY,, 422 F. Supp. 820 (W.D. Wis. 1976)

. . . . §§ 943.32(1) and 943.32(2). . . .

A. HOLMES, v. L. GRAY,, 526 F.2d 622 (7th Cir. 1975)

. . . Holmes was charged with armed robbery and attempted murder in violation of sections 943.32(l)(b) and . . .

CLARK, a v. ZIEDONIS,, 513 F.2d 79 (7th Cir. 1975)

. . . . §§ 939.32, 943.10 and 943.32 (1958). . . .

MILLER, v. L. QUATSOE,, 332 F. Supp. 1269 (E.D. Wis. 1971)

. . . . § 943.32) and sentenced to an indeterminate term of not more than twelve years in the Wisconsin state . . .

F. HOLMES, v. R. GAGNON,, 324 F. Supp. 180 (E.D. Wis. 1971)

. . . was convicted by a state court on February 23, 1970, of armed robbery in violation of §§ 939.05 and 943.32 . . .

PATELSKI, v. O. CADY,, 313 F. Supp. 1268 (E.D. Wis. 1970)

. . . Section 943.32, Wis.Stats, provides for a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years for robbery. . . .

JOSEPH KANDALL v. THE UNITED STATES, 186 Ct. Cl. 900 (Ct. Cl. 1969)

. . . Also the trade-in allowance of $943.32 on Mr. . . . connection with such purchase plaintiff had traded in a 1955 Chevrolet, upon which Kinney allowed $943.32 . . .

OSTROWSKI, v. C. BURKE,, 402 F.2d 377 (7th Cir. 1968)

. . . Under Section 943.32 of the Wisconsin Statutes, the maximum penalty for unarmed robbery is 10 years. . . . Under Section 943.32, robbery and unarmed robbery are separate and distinct offenses carrying different . . .

ORESKOVICH v. UNITED STATES, 198 F. Supp. 64 (E.D. Wis. 1961)

. . . See, for example, Wis.Stats., Sections 943.10 “Burglary” and 943.32 “Robbery,” both providing for a ten-year . . .

Co. v., 5 B.T.A. 243 (B.T.A. 1926)

. . . Gross sales for the years 1919 to 1922, inclusive, were as follows: 1019_'_$246,820.38 1920_ 336, 943.32 . . .