Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 941.45 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 941.45 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 941.45 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 941.45

The 2024 Florida Statutes (including 2025 Special Session C)

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 941
CORRECTIONS: INTERSTATE COOPERATION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 941.45
941.45 Interstate Agreement on Detainers.The interstate compact known as the “Interstate Agreement on Detainers” is enacted into law and entered into by the state as a party, and is of full force and effect between the state and any other states joining therein in the form substantially as follows:

INTERSTATE AGREEMENT
ON DETAINERS

ARTICLE I

Policy and Purpose

The party states find that charges outstanding against a prisoner, detainers based on untried indictments, informations, or complaints, and difficulties in securing speedy trial of persons already incarcerated in other jurisdictions produce uncertainties which obstruct programs of prisoner treatment and rehabilitation. Accordingly, it is the policy of the party states and the purpose of this agreement to encourage the expeditious and orderly disposition of such charges and determination of the proper status of any and all detainers based on untried indictments, informations, or complaints. The party states also find that proceedings with reference to such charges and detainers, when emanating from another jurisdiction, cannot properly be had in the absence of cooperative procedures. It is the further purpose of this agreement to provide such cooperative procedures.

ARTICLE II

Definitions

As used in this agreement:

(a) “State” means the United States of America, a state, territory, or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

(b) “Sending state” means a state in which a prisoner is incarcerated at the time he or she initiates a request for final disposition pursuant to Article III or at the time that a request for custody or availability is initiated pursuant to Article IV.

(c) “Receiving state” means the state in which trial is to be had on an indictment, information, or complaint pursuant to Article III or Article IV.

ARTICLE III

Request for Final Disposition

(a) Whenever a person has entered upon a term of imprisonment in a penal or correctional institution of a party state, and whenever during the continuance of the term of imprisonment there is pending in any other party state any untried indictment, information, or complaint on the basis of which a detainer has been lodged against the prisoner, he or she shall be brought to trial within 180 days after the prisoner shall have caused to be delivered to the prosecuting officer and the appropriate court of the prosecuting officer’s jurisdiction written notice of the place of his or her imprisonment and the prisoner’s request for a final disposition to be made of the indictment, information, or complaint; provided that, for good cause shown in open court, the prisoner or the prisoner’s counsel being present, the court having jurisdiction of the matter may grant any necessary or reasonable continuance. The request of the prisoner shall be accompanied by a certificate of the appropriate official having custody of the prisoner, stating the term of commitment under which the prisoner is being held, the time already served, the time remaining to be served on the sentence, the amount of good time earned, the time of parole eligibility of the prisoner, and any decisions of the state parole agency relating to the prisoner.

(b) The written notice and request for final disposition referred to in paragraph (a) shall be given or sent by the prisoner to the warden, commissioner of corrections, or other official having custody of the prisoner, who shall promptly forward it together with the certificate to the appropriate prosecuting official and court by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested.

(c) The warden, commissioner of corrections, or other official having custody of the prisoner shall promptly inform the prisoner of the source and contents of any detainer lodged against him or her and shall also inform the prisoner of his or her right to make a request for final disposition of the indictment, information, or complaint on which the detainer is based.

(d) Any request for final disposition made by a prisoner pursuant to paragraph (a) shall operate as a request for final disposition of all untried indictments, informations, or complaints on the basis of which detainers have been lodged against the prisoner from the state to whose prosecuting official the request for final disposition is specifically directed. The warden, commissioner of corrections, or other official having custody of the prisoner shall forthwith notify all appropriate prosecuting officers and courts in the several jurisdictions within the state to which the prisoner’s request for final disposition is being sent of the proceeding being initiated by the prisoner. Any notification sent pursuant to this paragraph shall be accompanied by copies of the prisoner’s written notice, request, and the certificate. If trial is not had on any indictment, information, or complaint contemplated hereby prior to the return of the prisoner to the original place of imprisonment, such indictment, information, or complaint shall not be of any further force or effect, and the court shall enter an order dismissing the same with prejudice.

(e) Any request for final disposition made by a prisoner pursuant to paragraph (a) shall also be deemed to be a waiver of extradition with respect to any charge or proceeding contemplated thereby or included therein by reason of paragraph (d), and a waiver of extradition to the receiving state to serve any sentence there imposed upon him or her, after completion of the prisoner’s term of imprisonment in the sending state. The request for final disposition shall also constitute a consent by the prisoner to the production of his or her body in any court where the prisoner’s presence may be required in order to effectuate the purposes of this agreement and a further consent voluntarily to be returned to the original place of imprisonment in accordance with the provisions of this agreement. Nothing in this paragraph shall prevent the imposition of a concurrent sentence if otherwise permitted by law.

(f) Escape from custody by the prisoner subsequent to his or her execution of the request for final disposition referred to in paragraph (a) shall void the request.

ARTICLE IV

Request for Custody or Availability

(a) The appropriate officer of the jurisdiction in which an untried indictment, information, or complaint is pending shall be entitled to have a prisoner against whom the officer has lodged a detainer and who is serving a term of imprisonment in any party state made available in accordance with Article V(a) upon presentation of a written request for temporary custody or availability to the appropriate authorities of the state in which the prisoner is incarcerated; provided that the court having jurisdiction of such indictment, information, or complaint shall have duly approved, recorded, and transmitted the request and provided further that there shall be a period of 30 days after receipt by the appropriate authorities before the request be honored, within which period the governor of the sending state may disapprove the request for temporary custody or availability, either upon the governor’s own motion or upon motion of the prisoner.

(b) Upon receipt of the officer’s written request as provided in paragraph (a), the appropriate authorities having the prisoner in custody shall furnish the officer with a certificate stating the term of commitment under which the prisoner is being held, the time already served, the time remaining to be served on the sentence, the amount of good time earned, the time of parole eligibility of the prisoner, and any decisions of the state parole agency relating to the prisoner. Said authorities simultaneously shall furnish all other officers and appropriate courts in the receiving state who have lodged detainers against the prisoner with similar certificates and with notices informing them of the request for custody or availability and of the reasons therefor.

(c) In respect of any proceeding made possible by this article, trial shall be commenced within 120 days of the arrival of the prisoner in the receiving state, but for good cause shown in open court, the prisoner or the prisoner’s counsel being present, the court having jurisdiction of the matter may grant any necessary or reasonable continuance.

(d) Nothing contained in this article shall be construed to deprive any prisoner of any right which the prisoner may have to contest the legality of his or her delivery as provided in paragraph (a), but such delivery may not be opposed or denied on the ground that the executive authority of the sending state has not affirmatively consented to or ordered such delivery.

(e) If trial is not had on any indictment, information, or complaint contemplated hereby prior to the prisoner’s being returned to the original place of imprisonment pursuant to paragraph (e) of Article V, such indictment, information, or complaint shall not be of any further force or effect, and the court shall enter an order dismissing the same with prejudice.

ARTICLE V

Offer to Deliver Temporary Custody

(a) In response to a request made under Article III or Article IV, the appropriate authority in a sending state shall offer to deliver temporary custody of such prisoner to the appropriate authority in the state where such indictment, information, or complaint is pending against such person in order that speedy and efficient prosecution may be had. If the request for final disposition is made by the prisoner, the offer of temporary custody shall accompany the written notice provided for in Article III. In the case of a federal prisoner, the appropriate authority in the receiving state shall be entitled to temporary custody as provided by this article or to the prisoner’s presence in federal custody at the place for trial, whichever custodial arrangement may be approved by the custodian.

(b) The officer or other representative of a state accepting an offer of temporary custody shall present the following upon demand:

1. Proper identification and evidence of the officer’s authority to act for the state into whose temporary custody the prisoner is to be given, and

2. A duly certified copy of the indictment, information, or complaint on the basis of which the detainer has been lodged and on the basis of which the request for temporary custody of the prisoner has been made.

(c) If the appropriate authority shall refuse or fail to accept temporary custody of said person, or in the event that an action on the indictment, information, or complaint on the basis of which the detainer has been lodged is not brought to trial within the period provided in Article III or Article IV, the appropriate court of the jurisdiction where the indictment, information, or complaint has been pending shall enter an order dismissing the same with prejudice, and any detainer based thereon shall cease to be of any force or effect.

(d) The temporary custody referred to in this article shall be only for the purpose of permitting prosecution on the charge or charges contained in one or more untried indictments, informations, or complaints which form the basis of the detainer or detainers or for prosecution on any other charge or charges arising out of the same transaction. Except for the prisoner’s attendance at court and while being transported to or from any place at which his or her presence may be required, the prisoner shall be held in a suitable jail or other facility regularly used for persons awaiting prosecution.

(e) At the earliest practicable time consonant with the purposes of this agreement, the prisoner shall be returned to the sending state.

(f) During the continuance of temporary custody or while the prisoner is otherwise being made available for trial as required by this agreement, time being served on the sentence shall continue to run but good time shall be earned by the prisoner only if, and to the extent that, the law and practice of the jurisdiction which imposed the sentence may allow.

(g) For all purposes other than that for which temporary custody as provided in this article is exercised, the prisoner shall be deemed to remain in the custody of and subject to the jurisdiction of the sending state and any escape from temporary custody may be dealt with in the same manner as an escape from the original place of imprisonment or in any other manner permitted by law.

(h) From the time that a party state receives custody of a prisoner pursuant to this agreement until such prisoner is returned to the territory and custody of the sending state, the state in which the one or more untried indictments, informations, or complaints are pending or in which trial is being had shall be responsible for the prisoner and shall also pay all costs of transporting, caring for, keeping, and returning the prisoner. The provisions of this paragraph shall govern unless the states concerned have entered into a supplementary agreement providing for a different allocation of costs and responsibilities as between or among themselves. Nothing herein contained shall be construed to alter or affect any internal relationship among the departments, agencies, and officers of and in the government of a party state, or between a party state and its subdivisions, as to the payment of costs or responsibilities therefor.

ARTICLE VI

Tolling Period and Limitations

(a) In determining the duration and expiration dates of the time periods provided in Articles III and IV, the running of said time periods shall be tolled whenever and for as long as the prisoner is unable to stand trial, as determined by the court having jurisdiction of the matter.

(b) No provision of this agreement, and no remedy made available by this agreement, shall apply to any person who is adjudged to be mentally ill.

ARTICLE VII

Designation of Officer

Each state party to this agreement shall designate an officer who, acting jointly with like officers of other party states, shall promulgate rules and regulations to carry out more effectively the terms and provisions of this agreement and who shall provide, within and without the state, information necessary to the effective operation of this agreement.

ARTICLE VIII

Effectiveness and Withdrawal

This agreement shall enter into full force and effect as to a party state when such state has enacted the same into law. A state party to this agreement may withdraw herefrom by enacting a statute repealing the same. However, the withdrawal of any state shall not affect the status of any proceedings already initiated by inmates or by state officers at the time such withdrawal takes effect, nor shall it affect their rights in respect thereof.

ARTICLE IX

Construction and Severability

This agreement shall be liberally construed so as to effectuate its purposes. The provisions of this agreement shall be severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, or provision of this agreement is declared to be contrary to the constitution of any party state or of the United States or the applicability thereof to any government, agency, person, or circumstance is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this agreement and the applicability thereof to any government, agency, person, or circumstance shall not be affected thereby. If this agreement shall be held contrary to the constitution of any state party hereto, the agreement shall remain in full force and effect as to the remaining states and in full force and effect as to the state affected as to all severable matters.

History.s. 1, ch. 73-287; s. 3, ch. 89-531; s. 1623, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 941.45 on Google Scholar

F.S. 941.45 on CourtListener

Amendments to 941.45


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 941.45

Total Results: 75

Torres-Arboledo v. State

524 So. 2d 403, 1988 WL 26245

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1988 | Docket: 2514587

Cited 91 times | Published

requesting final disposition of the charges, section 941.45(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1985), that his motion

Johnson v. State

593 So. 2d 206, 1992 WL 164

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 1992 | Docket: 446377

Cited 46 times | Published

State under the IAD's "good cause" provision, section 941.45(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1979), as the continuance

Vining v. State

637 So. 2d 921, 1994 WL 149681

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1994 | Docket: 1521580

Cited 36 times | Published

basis for lodging a detainer against the prisoner. § 941.45(3), Fla. Stat. (1987). The IAD also permits the

Stone v. State

378 So. 2d 765

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1979 | Docket: 1795211

Cited 34 times | Published

authority of a detainer lodged pursuant to section 941.45, Florida Statutes (1973). Defendant's conviction

Johnson v. State

442 So. 2d 193

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1983 | Docket: 1515930

Cited 24 times | Published

the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD), section 941.45, Florida Statutes (1979), had elapsed. Appellant

Brown v. State

674 So. 2d 738, 1995 WL 552814

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1995 | Docket: 1661950

Cited 20 times | Published

the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act.[3]See § 941.45, Fla.Stat. (1993); 18 U.S.C.App. 2, § 1 et seq

Fuente v. State

549 So. 2d 652, 1989 WL 106357

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1989 | Docket: 1373990

Cited 18 times | Published

brought to trial within 180 days pursuant to section 941.45(3) had been violated. At the hearing on the

Remeta v. Singletary

85 F.3d 513, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 12585, 1996 WL 284966

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 31, 1996 | Docket: 328526

Cited 16 times | Published

Interstate Agreement on Detainers (“IAD”), Fla.Stat. § 941.45, is an issue of first impression in this circuit

Coit v. State

440 So. 2d 409

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 1983 | Docket: 1430496

Cited 12 times | Published

charge in accordance with the provisions of Section 941.45(3)(a), (b) and (c), Florida Statutes (1979)

Bogue v. Fennelly

705 So. 2d 575, 1997 WL 276289

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1997 | Docket: 1582257

Cited 11 times | Published

the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD), section 941.45, Florida Statutes, do not apply to sentencing

State v. Agee

588 So. 2d 600, 1991 WL 167288

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1991 | Docket: 1708287

Cited 11 times | Published

affect a prisoner's right to speedy trial under section 941.45-941.50, Florida Statutes (1979). Although the

State v. Roberts

427 So. 2d 787

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1983 | Docket: 1151785

Cited 11 times | Published

Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IADA), section 941.45(3), Florida Statutes (1979), for the 180-day

Gaddy v. Turner

376 So. 2d 1225

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1979 | Docket: 1411036

Cited 9 times | Published

the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, Section 941.45, Florida Statutes (1977), apply to a detainer

State v. Minnick

413 So. 2d 168

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1982 | Docket: 1344643

Cited 7 times | Published

final order entered under the authority of section 941.45, Florida Statutes (1979) (Interstate Agreement

State v. Grizzell

399 So. 2d 1091

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1981 | Docket: 1167094

Cited 7 times | Published

"anti-shuttling" provision of the interstate act, Section 941.45(4)(e), Florida Statutes,[3] rendered the Tennessee

Shewan v. State

396 So. 2d 1133

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1981 | Docket: 1732173

Cited 6 times | Published

lapse of the speedy trial time set forth in section 941.45, Florida Statutes (1977). We affirm the judgment

Taylor v. State

582 So. 2d 152, 1991 WL 120785

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1991 | Docket: 2589573

Cited 5 times | Published

complaint" so as to trigger compliance with section 941.45, Florida Statutes (1989), the Interstate Agreement

Wainwright v. Evans

403 So. 2d 1123

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1981 | Docket: 1250906

Cited 5 times | Published

within one hundred eighty days as required by section 941.45(3)(a) Florida Statutes. The state contends

Lett v. State

837 So. 2d 614, 2003 WL 367854

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2003 | Docket: 537726

Cited 4 times | Published

the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act. See § 941.45, Fla. Stat. (1993); 18 U.S.C.App. 2, § 1 et seq

State v. Garza

807 So. 2d 790, 2002 WL 254127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2002 | Docket: 1750735

Cited 4 times | Published

and the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, section 941.45, Florida Statutes (1999) (IAD). We reverse

State v. Fay

763 So. 2d 473, 2000 WL 786270

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2000 | Docket: 1681804

Cited 4 times | Published

the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD), section 941.45(3), Florida Statutes, was violated. Appellee

Parker v. State

539 So. 2d 1168, 1989 WL 19567

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1989 | Docket: 93850

Cited 4 times | Published

under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, section 941.45, Florida Statutes, was violated. The record

State v. Butler

496 So. 2d 916, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2256

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 1986 | Docket: 428315

Cited 4 times | Published

"programs of prisoner treatment and rehabilitation." § 941.45(1), Fla. Stat. The purpose of the act is to "obviate

Toro v. State

479 So. 2d 298, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2715

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1985 | Docket: 125364

Cited 4 times | Published

IV(c) of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, § 941.45(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (1983).[1] We disagree. Applying

State v. Culligan

454 So. 2d 700

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1984 | Docket: 444384

Cited 4 times | Published

compliance with the requirements contained in Section 941.45(3) is sufficient to trigger the speedy trial

Williams v. State

426 So. 2d 1121

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1983 | Docket: 614783

Cited 4 times | Published

he was entitled to a discharge pursuant to Section 941.45(4)(e), Florida Statutes (1977). We disagree

State v. Wiggins

425 So. 2d 621

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 1983 | Docket: 1182150

Cited 4 times | Published

pending charges. The trial court held that under Section 941.45(3), Florida Statutes (1981) (a section of the

Maggard v. Wainwright

411 So. 2d 200

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1982 | Docket: 1696868

Cited 4 times | Published

indictments, informations, or complaints." Section 941.45, Florida Statutes (1979). Based on the reasoning

Jones v. State

386 So. 2d 804

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1980 | Docket: 1518310

Cited 4 times | Published

Kentucky. He contends that the Florida Statute, Section 941.45(5)(d) (1979),[1] limits the jurisdiction of

Gee v. State

954 So. 2d 83, 2007 WL 1146717

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2007 | Docket: 1704223

Cited 3 times | Published

under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, section 941.45, Florida Statutes, (IAD) was violated. We have

State v. Antonietti

558 So. 2d 192, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 762

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1990 | Docket: 1404797

Cited 3 times | Published

Florida Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, § 941.45 Fla. Stat. (1987). One month later Florida accepted

State v. Edwards

509 So. 2d 1161, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1513, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8865

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1987 | Docket: 64628399

Cited 3 times | Published

disposition of the charges against him under section 941.45(3)(b) of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers

Hawkins v. State

451 So. 2d 903

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1984 | Docket: 1483202

Cited 3 times | Published

affect a prisoner's right to speedy trial under section 941.45-941.50, Florida Statutes (1979). The defendant

Irby v. State of Mo.

427 So. 2d 367

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1983 | Docket: 1478211

Cited 3 times | Published

On November 6, 1981, appellant, pursuant to section 941.45, Florida Statutes (1981), submitted to the

State v. Ivey

410 So. 2d 636

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1982 | Docket: 477798

Cited 3 times | Published

Institution a request for custody pursuant to section 941.45(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1979), the state was

Pinnock v. State

384 So. 2d 738

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1980 | Docket: 1678612

Cited 3 times | Published

on detainers (re: speedy trial) defined in section 941.45, Florida Statutes (1979). The trial court denied

Monroe v. State

978 So. 2d 177, 2007 WL 2535259

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2007 | Docket: 1508769

Cited 2 times | Published

Agreement on Detainers Act (IADA), codified as section 941.45, Florida Statutes (2004). The charges included

Quinn v. State

713 So. 2d 1046, 1998 WL 320133

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1998 | Docket: 1450655

Cited 2 times | Published

the charges against a defendant with prejudice. § 941.45(5)(c), Fla. Stat. (1995). Instead of applying

Clark v. State

662 So. 2d 729, 1995 WL 627517

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1995 | Docket: 1683578

Cited 2 times | Published

Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (hereafter IAD). § 941.45, Fla. Stat. (1991). He filed the appropriate papers

State v. Smiley

529 So. 2d 349, 1988 WL 81555

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1988 | Docket: 432295

Cited 2 times | Published

disposition of the charges against him, under section 941.45(3)(a), was ineffective to start the time running

Welch v. State

528 So. 2d 1236, 1988 WL 72175

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1988 | Docket: 2547532

Cited 2 times | Published

filed a request for disposition pursuant to section 941.45 Fla. Stat., the Interstate Agreement on Detainers

State v. Moser

445 So. 2d 696

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1984 | Docket: 1287955

Cited 2 times | Published

provisions of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, section 941.45(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1981). We dismiss

Dozier v. State

175 So. 3d 322, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12619, 2015 WL 4946409

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2015 | Docket: 60250550

Cited 1 times | Published

state parole agency relating to the prisoner. § 941.45, Fla. Stat. (2012). Article 111(b) of the IADA

Churchwell v. State

44 So. 3d 645, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14077, 2010 WL 3655540

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2010 | Docket: 1366381

Cited 1 times | Published

complaint' so as to trigger compliance with section 941.45, Florida Statutes (1989), the Interstate Agreement

Halle v. State

914 So. 2d 470, 2005 WL 2806436

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 2005 | Docket: 1781358

Cited 1 times | Published

Interstate Agreement on Detainers ["IAD"], section 941.45, Art. III(d), Florida Statutes (2004). The

Hunter, III v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2025 | Docket: 70988583

Published

the court issued a warrant for his 1 § 941.45, Fla. Stat. (2021). It is also sometimes abbreviated

Willie Crockett v. State of Florida

206 So. 3d 742, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13344

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 2016 | Docket: 4419303

Published

or complaint on which the detainer is based.” § 941.45(Art, III)(c), Fla. Stat. (2004). It is through

Dawes v. State

135 So. 3d 420, 2014 WL 773119, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3223

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2014 | Docket: 60239630

Published

untried indictments, informations or complaints. See § 941.45(1), Fla. Stat. (2011); United States v. Wilson

Devine v. State

120 So. 3d 171, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 13469, 2013 WL 4483099

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2013 | Docket: 60233939

Published

contains the Interstate Agreement on Detainers. Section 941.45, article III, governs prisoners’ requests for

Walker v. State

43 So. 3d 915, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13431, 2010 WL 3515570

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 2010 | Docket: 60295512

Published

Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (“IADA”), section 941.45, Florida Statutes, and 18 U.S.C. Appendix.2

Parks v. State

43 So. 3d 858, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12922, 2010 WL 3446170

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2010 | Docket: 2398941

Published

Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act ["IADA"], Section 941.45(a), Florida Statutes (2004). We affirm. In

Candelaria v. State

937 So. 2d 1266, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16371, 2006 WL 2787527

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2006 | Docket: 64846904

Published

comply substantially with the requirements of section 941.45, Florida Statutes (2005). See Torres-Arboledo

Solorio v. State

884 So. 2d 154, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10886, 2004 WL 1618534

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 2004 | Docket: 64833444

Published

relief to which he may be entitled pursuant to section 941.45, Florida Statutes (2003), the Interstate Agreement

Phillips v. State

795 So. 2d 1033, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12559, 2001 WL 1045041

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2001 | Docket: 64809018

Published

enforce the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, section 941.45, Florida Statutes (1999). According to the

Guerrero v. State

779 So. 2d 392, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8480, 2000 WL 900120

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2000 | Docket: 64804146

Published

a request for final disposition pursuant to section 941.45, article III, Florida Statutes (1999). PARKER

Wisniewski v. State

650 So. 2d 188, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 993, 1995 WL 49264

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1995 | Docket: 64754181

Published

in the Interstate Agreement on Detainers. See § 941.45, Fla.Stat. (1993); § 24-60-501, Colo.Rev.Stat

Schuhart v. State

647 So. 2d 1049, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12454, 1994 WL 708171

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1994 | Docket: 64753071

Published

113 S.Ct. 1085, 1091, 122 L.Ed.2d 406 (1993); § 941.45(3)(2), Fla.Stat. (1987). The state was required

Segroves v. State

629 So. 2d 967, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12619, 1993 WL 535962

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1993 | Docket: 64745386

Published

motion to dismiss. He argues that pursuant to section 941.45(3), Florida Statutes (1991), he was denied

Kramer v. Metro-Dade Corrections & Rehabilitation Department

822 F. Supp. 1572, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7801, 1993 WL 188887

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 28, 1993 | Docket: 65984559

Published

18 U.S.C.App. II § 2. See also Fla. Stat.Ann. § 941.45 (West Ann.1985 & Supp. 1983). In any event, as

John v. State

534 So. 2d 895, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2657, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5398, 1988 WL 129540

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1988 | Docket: 64638949

Published

incarcerated in a foreign state pursuant to section 941.45(3)(a), Florida Statutes, he sent a letter notifying

Sharp v. State

522 So. 2d 51, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 433, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 535, 1988 WL 8378

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1988 | Docket: 64633556

Published

comply with section 941.45, Florida Statutes (1985).1 Sharp’s contention that section 941.45 applies to

Burns v. State

523 So. 2d 604, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 89, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11684, 1987 WL 3031

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1987 | Docket: 64634169

Published

requesting a final disposition pursuant to section 941.45, Florida Statutes (1985) (Interstate Agreement

Martin v. State

503 So. 2d 994, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 775, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12063

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1987 | Docket: 64625737

Published

Criminal Procedure 3.191, as authorized by section 941.45(3)(a) Fla.Stat. We grant the writ. In response

Cavanaugh v. State

495 So. 2d 1232, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2215, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10210

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1986 | Docket: 64622305

Published

45-941.-50, Florida Statutes, and particularly section 941.45(3)(a) which permits the defendant to request

Distiso v. Wainwright

451 So. 2d 988, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13613

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1984 | Docket: 64605496

Published

to the Interstate Agreement on De-tainers, section 941.45-.50, Florida Statutes (1983). Pennsylvania’s

Shumate v. State

449 So. 2d 387, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12956

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1984 | Docket: 64604447

Published

confinement and his request for trial under section 941.45(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981). See Coit v

Lorenzo v. State

422 So. 2d 1058, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21841

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1982 | Docket: 64593768

Published

the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, section 941.45, Florida Statutes (1979). Lorenzo was placed

Saxon v. State

416 So. 2d 904, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20518

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1982 | Docket: 64591169

Published

disposition of the pending charges pursuant to Section 941.45(3)(a), Florida Statutes. No reply was received

Dillman v. State

411 So. 2d 964, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19665

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1982 | Docket: 64588874

Published

resulting from pending Florida charges, see Section 941.45(3), Florida Statutes (1979), did within 180

Proctor v. Wainwright

408 So. 2d 793, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18899

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1982 | Docket: 64587337

Published

concur. WENTWORTH, J., concurs specially. . Section 941.45(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1979), requires trial

Hunter v. Franza

405 So. 2d 1035, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21565

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1981 | Docket: 64586059

Published

45 to 941.50, Florida Statutes (1979). Under Section 941.45(4)(c) petitioner was entitled to be tried within

O'Connell v. State

400 So. 2d 136, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20224

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1981 | Docket: 64583419

Published

time period set by the agreement.1 Pursuant to section 941.45(5)(e), Florida Statutes (1979), the dismissal

Allen v. State

390 So. 2d 806, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17753

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1980 | Docket: 64579019

Published

under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, Section 941.-45 et seq., Florida Statutes. By letter dated

Cox v. State

389 So. 2d 1028, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17175

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 1980 | Docket: 64578645

Published

Maryland. The Interstate Agreement on Detainers, section 941.45(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1979), provides that

Florida Bar

389 So. 2d 610, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4378

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1980 | Docket: 64578555

Published

affect a prisoner’s right to speedy trial under section 941.45-941.50, Florida Statutes (1979).] [(b)(2)