Cases from cite.case.law:

POLAKOFF AABBOTT BAIL BONDS, v. STATE, 111 So. 3d 253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . In 2006, the Legislature amended section 903.02(4), Florida Statutes, to provide that "[a]ny judge setting . . .

FIRELINE BAIL BONDS v. E. BROCK,, 110 So. 3d 11 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . supports his argument by directing our attention to the 2006 amendment adding subsection (4) to section 903.02 . . . Section 903.02(4) provides as follows: “Any judge setting or granting monetary bail shall set a separate . . . Thus section 903.02(4) eliminates the use of so-called “blanket bonds” and requires a separate bond for . . . Before the addition of subsection (4) to section 903.02, Florida courts frequently set a single bail . . . Florida amended Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.131(b)(2) by adding the language of subsection 903.02 . . .

P. HYATT, v. KAPPOS,, 625 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . See MPEP §§ 903.02, 903.08, 904 (8th ed. Rev. 7, Sept. 2008). . . .

P. HYATT, v. KAPPOS,, 625 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . See MPEP §§ 903.02, 903.08, 904 (8th ed. Rev. 7, Sept. 2008). . . .

In CITY OF VALLEJO,, 403 B.R. 72 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . As explained in 6 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 903.02[2] (Alan N. Resnick and Henry J. . . . C.D.Cal.1996) (“Orange County III”)', see also Collier, at ¶ 903.02[4], Consequently, if a municipality . . .

AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, THE FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE, THE FLORIDA RULES OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE, AND THE FLORIDA PROBATE RULES, 887 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 2004)

. . . (c) Same as section 903.02, Florida Statutes. (d) Same as section 903.12, Florida Statutes. . . .

HUGHES v. THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, P. H. a, 274 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (S.D. Fla. 2003)

. . . . § 903.02 (providing that only the judge who imposed the conditions of bail or the chief judge of the . . . Stat. § 903.02, the Court finds that the state trial judge and the chief judge of the circuit are properly . . .

ANDERSON a k a v. STATE, 669 So. 2d 262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . While recognizing that a violation of section 903.02 is not always punishable as a third degree felony . . .

In COUNTY OF ORANGE, a, 179 B.R. 195 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1995)

. . . anything more than provide a method for municipalities to adjust their indebtedness. 4 Collier, supra, ¶ 903.02 . . . Bekins, 304 U.S. 27, 51, 58 S.Ct. 811, 815, 82 L.Ed. 1137 (1938). 4 Collier, supra, ¶ 903.02 at 903-2 . . .

In COUNTY OF ORANGE, a ALLIANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT L. P. v. COUNTY OF ORANGE,, 179 B.R. 185 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1995)

. . . anything more than provide a method for municipalities to adjust their indebtedness. 4 Collier, supra, ¶ 903.02 . . . the constitutionality of the 1937 Act in Bekins, 304 U.S. at 51, 58 S.Ct. at 815. 4 Collier, supra, ¶ 903.02 . . .

In COUNTY OF ORANGE, a ORANGE COUNTY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, OCEA AOCDS AFL- CIO, I. A. F. F. AFL- CIO, AFL- CIO ADMOC AFL- CIO, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE,, 179 B.R. 177 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1995)

. . . anything more than provide a method for municipalities to adjust their indebtedness. 4 Collier, supra, ¶ 903.02 . . . Bekins, 304 U.S. 27, 51, 58 S.Ct. 811, 815, 82 L.Ed. 1137 (1938). 4 Collier, supra, ¶ 903.02 at 903-2 . . .

In CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS SPRING CREEK GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT,, 177 B.R. 684 (Bankr. D. Colo. 1995)

. . . providing a procedure under which municipalities may adjust their indebtedness. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 903.02 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 606 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 1992)

. . . (c) Same as section 903.02, Florida Statutes. (d) Same as section 903.12, Florida Statutes. . . .

In FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 196 So. 2d 124 (Fla. 1967)

. . . (c) Same as 903.02. (d) Same as 903.12. (e) Substantially same as 903.13. (f) Same as 903.19. . . .

W. GOSSETT, a k a W. v. J. HANLON, Jr. A,, 195 So. 2d 865 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . . §§ 903.02, 903.04, and 903.19), production and impoundment of evidence (F.S.A. §§ 903.03 and 925.04 . . .

SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY, a a v. UNITED STATES, 306 F.2d 855 (9th Cir. 1962)

. . . the judgment granting appellee judgment against Seaboard and Hansen & Rowland in the amount of $1,-903.02 . . . Since the right of appellee to the $1,-903.02 depends upon its lien upon the full amount of taxpayer’ . . . We affirm the judgment awarding $1,-903.02 to appellee. . . .