Cases from cite.case.law:

SAMPSON FARM LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, v. D. PARMENTER, A. S., 238 So. 3d 387 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Parmenter, as former personal representative, filed a petition to reopen the Estate pursuant to section 733.903 . . .

CIUNGU, v. BULEA,, 162 So. 3d 290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See § 733.903, Fla. Stat. (2003); Fla. Prob. . . .

MACIER, v. In ESTATE OF BESSIE GIAMPORTONE,, 972 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Inasmuch as the probate judge had jurisdiction and the power to re-open the Estate under section 733.903 . . .

C. CARRAWAY, JR. v. CARRAWAY,, 883 So. 2d 834 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Although section 733.903 and Florida Probate Rule 5.460(a) allow further administration of the estate . . .

AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA PROBATE RULES, 848 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. 2003)

. . . Statutory Reference § 733.903, Fla. Stat. Subsequent administration. Rule References Fla. Prob. . . .

CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, USA, N. A. v. ESTATE OF PATRICIA SILVEIRA,, 815 So. 2d 770 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Section 733.903, Florida Statutes (1999), states: The final settlement of an estate and the discharge . . .

A. DRIBIN N. A. Co- S. v. ESTATE OF S. NOLAN,, 801 So. 2d 249 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Additionally, section 733.903, Florida Statutes, provides that the final settlement of an estate and . . . representatives have the ability to request and receive an order of subsequent administration pursuant to section 733.903 . . .

COMBS v. ESTATE OF E. EMERY,, 723 So. 2d 375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . held in trust pursuant to earlier court orders, and properly exercised its authority under section 733.903 . . .

ELMOWITZ, v. ESTATE E. ZIMMERMAN,, 647 So. 2d 1064 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . We note that under section 733.903, Florida Statutes (1988) an estate may be reopened for good cause . . .

In ESTATE OF GLEASON a k a E. RAINE, v. GLEASON, a k a, 631 So. 2d 321 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Although section 733.903, Florida Statutes (1987), authorizes reopening estates “if. other property of . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA PROBATE RULES, 607 So. 2d 1306 (Fla. 1992)

. . . Statutory Reference ¾&§ 733.903, Fla.Stat. Subsequent administration. RULE 5.470. . . .

ESTATE OF McKINNEY, v. M. SOFKA,, 585 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . See § 733.903, Fla.Stat. (1987); Kent Ins. Co. v. . . .

PAYETTE, v. W. CLARK, W. E. S. I. I. O., 559 So. 2d 630 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Second, the petition can be maintained under section 733.903, Florida Statutes (1987). . . . Extrinsic fraud which prevents a party from having an opportunity to present his case in court. . § 733.903 . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR. In Re RULES OF PROBATE AND GUARDIANSHIP PROCEDURE, 537 So. 2d 500 (Fla. 1988)

. . . Statutory Reference F.S. 733.903 Subsequent administration. RULE 5.470. . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR. In Re RULES OF PROBATE AND GUARDIANSHIP PROCEDURE, 531 So. 2d 1261 (Fla. 1988)

. . . Statutory Reference F.S. 733.903 Subsequent administration. RULE 5.470. . . .

KENT INSURANCE COMPANY d b a v. In ESTATE OF ATWOOD a k a G., 481 So. 2d 1294 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Further, Section 733.903 states that the discharge of the personal representative shall not prevent a . . .

L. VAN DUSEN, E. G. v. SOUTHEAST FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, J. d b a, 478 So. 2d 82 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Section 733.903, Florida Statutes (1983), which provides for the reopening of estates, is not applicable . . . See In re Estate of Bateman (construing section 734.26, Florida Statutes, the predecessor to section 733.903 . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR RE AMENDMENT TO RULES- PROBATE AND GUARDIANSHIP, 458 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 1984)

. . . Statutory Reference F.S. 733.903 Subsequent administration. Rule 5.470. . . .

In ESTATE OF H. KILLINGER a k a H., 448 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . circuit court concluded that the finding of the will did not justify reopening the estate under section 733.903 . . . Appellant also argues that section 733.903, Florida Statutes (1981), would allow the reopening of this . . . termination of probate of an intestate estate does not justify revocation of probate under section 733.903 . . .

YELLEN v. V. LONG,, 387 So. 2d 384 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Assuming that probate proceedings may be reopened under Section 733.903, Florida Statutes (1979), or . . .

In ESTATE LEWIN, LEWIN, v. M. MARKSBURY, M., 374 So. 2d 58 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . 13, 16 (Fla.1976); In re Estate of Pennington, 226 So.2d 881, 884 (Fla.2d DCA 1969); §§ 731.201(1), 733.903 . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR. In SUPPLEMENTAL PETITION FOR CHANGES IN FLORIDA RULES OF PROBATE AND GUARDIANSHIP PROCEDURE, 344 So. 2d 828 (Fla. 1977)

. . . Committee Notes: 1975 Revision: Tracks FPC 733.903, re subsequent administration. . . . Statutory References: FPC 733.903, Subsequent Administration. . . .

In FLORIDA RULES OF PROBATE AND GUARDIANSHIP PROCEDURE, 324 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 1975)

. . . Committee Note: Tracks FPC 733.903, re subsequent administration. . . . STATUTORY REFERENCE: FPC 733.903, Subsequent Administration. . . .