The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY

Chapter 570
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 570.20

570.20 General Inspection Trust Fund.—

(1) All donations and all inspection fees and other funds authorized and received from whatever source in the enforcement of the inspection laws administered by the department shall be paid into the General Inspection Trust Fund of Florida, which is created in the office of the Chief Financial Officer. All expenses incurred in carrying out the provisions of the inspection laws shall be paid from this fund as other funds are paid from the State Treasury. A percentage of all revenue deposited in this fund, including transfers from any subsidiary accounts, shall be deposited in the General Revenue Fund pursuant to chapter 215, except that funds collected for marketing orders shall pay at the rate of 4 percent.

(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, moneys in the General Inspection Trust Fund may be appropriated for programs operated by the department which are related to the programs authorized by this chapter in addition to the spending authorized in subsection (1).

History.—s. 1, ch. 59-54; s. 2, ch. 61-119; s. 4, ch. 61-493; ss. 14, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 9, ch. 83-339; s. 13, ch. 93-169; s. 738, ch. 2003-261; s. 27, ch. 2007-73; s. 39, ch. 2008-153; s. 3, ch. 2009-78; s. 34, ch. 2009-82; s. 30, ch. 2010-153; ss. 36, 82, ch. 2011-47; s. 5, ch. 2011-56.

F.S. 570.20 on Google Scholar

F.S. 570.20 on Casetext

Amendments to 570.20

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 570.20

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 570.20.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

BURGESS, v. A. DANIELS,, 578 F. App'x 747 (10th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 570.20 (“Community confinement is defined as residence in ... community correctional facilities] . . .

UNITED STATES v. KO,, 739 F.3d 558 (10th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 570.20. . . .

In S. RYAN, R. v. E. J. Jr., 472 B.R. 714 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2012)

. . . forty-three dollars and seventy-three cents ($1,443.73), and five hundred seventy dollars and twenty cents ($570.20 . . . Ryan ING $ 10,000.00 570.20 DFAS Dir. . . . Acet. ending 1648 $ 570.20 Acct. 1648 Acct. ending 9305 $ 1,800.00 11/15/07 $14,250.00 Acct. ending 7048 . . .

SACORA, L. H. v. E. THOMAS,, 628 F.3d 1059 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . . §§ 570.20-.22). . . . the November 14 Memorandum,] Program Statement 7310.04, Program Statement 5100.08[] and 28 C.F.R. § 570.20 . . . the district court granted the petition with respect to the BOP’s formal regulations, 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20 . . . The BOP did not appeal the district court's invalidation of the SCA regulations, 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20- . . .

GARZA, v. DAVIS,, 596 F.3d 1198 (10th Cir. 2010)

. . . . §§ 570.20 and 570.21. Mr. . . . educational programs, or similar facility-approved programs during non-residential hours.” 28 C.F.R. § 570.20 . . .

TORRES- VILLA, v. DAVIS,, 354 F. App'x 311 (10th Cir. 2009)

. . . . §§ 570.20 and 570.21. The government requested that the court dismiss Mr. . . .

Dy BUN, v. WILEY,, 351 F. App'x 267 (10th Cir. 2009)

. . . . §§ 570.20 and 570.21. . . . and transfer of eligible inmates to CCCs, and (2) BOP officials violated § 3624(c) and 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20 . . .

KRUEGER, v. MARTINEZ,, 665 F. Supp. 2d 477 (M.D. Pa. 2009)

. . . . §§ 570.20-570.22. Only sections 570.21 and 570.22 are relevant here. . . .

PIZARRO, v. SMITH,, 328 F. App'x 450 (9th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 570.20-21. . . .

v., 132 T.C. 131 (T.C. 2009)

. . . It relies on the Second, Third, Eighth, and Tenth Circuits’ invalidation of 28 C.F.R. secs. 570.20 and . . . involving the conflict between the Bureau of Prisons (bop) regulations codified at 28 C.F.R. sections 570.20 . . .

W. DEMIS, v. T. R. SNIEZEK, G., 558 F.3d 508 (6th Cir. 2009)

. . . . §§ 570.20 and 570.21, are inconsistent with the requisite individualized consideration of the factors . . . “categorical exercise of discretion for designating inmates to community confinement,” 28 C.F.R. § 570.20 . . . The magistrate judge concluded that BOP regulations 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20 and 570.21 “contradict or ignore . . . the “ ‘categorical timeframe limitations on prerelease community confinement’ found in 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20 . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. SMITH,, 541 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 2008)

. . . We conclude that the BOP’s categorical exercise of discretion as promulgated in 28 C.F.R §§ 570.20 and . . . least in part on the specific factors outlined in § 3621(b), and the BOP regulations set forth in §§ 570.20 . . . The final rules were published as 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20, 570.21 on January 10, 2005, see 70 F.R. 1659, . . . the statute, and thus deference is owed to the BOP’s interpretations (as expressed in 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20 . . . Section 570.20 provides: § 570.20 What is the purpose of this sub-part? . . .

J. T. HALTER, v. C. EICHENLAUB,, 566 F. Supp. 2d 649 (E.D. Mich. 2008)

. . . . §§ 570.20 and 570.21 to categorically deny petitioner placement in a CCC, because such a categorical . . . required to consider in good faith the factors contained in 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b) without regard to §§ 570.20 . . . Nothing in the unit manager’s letter to Petitioner indicates that the BOP used §§ 570.20 and 570.21 to . . .

H. MILLER, v. J. D. WHITEHEAD, v. J. D. v. J. D. A. Sr. v. J. D., 527 F.3d 752 (8th Cir. 2008)

. . . . §§ 570.20-21. This regulation was challenged in Fults v. . . .

MUNIZ, v. A. SABOL,, 517 F.3d 29 (1st Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 570.20(a). . . . prisoner the Bureau determines has a treatable condition of substance addiction or abuse. 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20 . . . -21 § 570.20 What is the purpose of this subpart? . . . The regulations, 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20-21, are set out in the Appendix. . . . .

M. TISCHENDORF, v. VAN BUREN, FMC-, 526 F. Supp. 2d 606 (N.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . . §§ 570.20 and 570.21 (2006) (collectively, “BOP Regulations”). . . . Section 570.20 states: (a) This subpart provides the Bureau of Prisons’ (Bureau) categorical exercise . . . prisoner a reasonable opportunity to adjust to and prepare for re-entry into the community,” 28 C.F.R. § 570.20 . . .

BROCK, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 256 F. App'x 748 (6th Cir. 2007)

. . . . §§ 570.20 & 570.21. . . .

WILLIAMS, v. PETTIFORD,, 518 F. Supp. 2d 737 (D.S.C. 2007)

. . . . §§ 570.20 and 570.21 (the “2005 regulations”). . . . These regulations provide, § 570.20 What is the purpose of this subpart? . . . In this court’s view, § 3624(c) has no bearing on whether §§ 570.20 and 570.21 are consistent with the . . . The new regulations became effective February 14, 2005, and are codified at 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20 and 570.21 . . . The 2005 regulations provide: § 570.20 What is the purpose of this subpart? . . .

JAWORSKI, v. A. GUTIERREZ,, 509 F. Supp. 2d 573 (N.D.W. Va. 2007)

. . . . § 570.20-21. . . .

MURDOCK, v. A. GUTIERREZ,, 631 F. Supp. 2d 758 (N.D.W. Va. 2007)

. . . . § 570.20-21. . . . during the last ten percent of the prison sentence being served not to exceed six months.” 28 C.F.R. § 570.20 . . .

ROSENSTEIN, v. R. WILEY,, 481 F. Supp. 2d 1201 (D. Colo. 2007)

. . . . §§ 570.20 and 570.21. Id. . . . The final rules, which became effective February 14, 2005, are codified at 28 C.F.R. § 570.20 and § 570.21 . . . The regulations state, in relevant part: § 570.20 What is the purpose of this subpart? . . . Corrections Center, in good faith, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b), and without regard to 28 C.F.R. § 570.20 . . .

BELL, v. R. WILEY,, 481 F. Supp. 2d 1168 (D. Colo. 2007)

. . . . § 570.20 and § 570.21. . . . The regulations state, in relevant part: § 570.20 What is the purpose of this subpart? . . . Corrections Center, in good faith, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b), and without regard to 28 C.F.R. § 570.20 . . .

M. LEJA, v. SABOL, FMC, 476 F. Supp. 2d 16 (D. Mass. 2007)

. . . . §§ 570.20 and 570.21 as divesting it of the authority to exercise the placement discretion conferred . . . community corrections placement in good faith without regard to its interpretation of 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20 . . .

J. WEDELSTEDT, v. WILEY,, 477 F.3d 1160 (10th Cir. 2007)

. . . . §§ 570.20 and 570.21, are inconsistent with clear congressional intent articulated in 18 U.S.C. § 3621 . . . Section 570.20 establishes the purpose of the regulations as a “categorical exercise of discretion for . . . The statute Respondent alleges authorized the promulgation of §§ 570.20 and 570.21, 18 U.S.C. § 3621( . . . The Levine, Fults, and Woodall courts each determined that the BOP regulations at 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20 . . . Relationship Between 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b) and 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20 and 570.21 Section 570.20(a), the policy . . .

D. SONNIER, v. FRANCIS,, 217 F. App'x 410 (5th Cir. 2007)

. . . . §§ 570.20 and 570.21 are invalid and that her due process rights were violated because she was sentenced . . .

BROWN, v. K. HOGSTEN,, 214 F. App'x 124 (3d Cir. 2007)

. . . . §§ 570.20, 570.21. . . .

PEREZ, v. L. WINN, FMC, 465 F. Supp. 2d 87 (D. Mass. 2006)

. . . . §§ 570.20 and 570.21 wrongly preclude individualized consideration of his eligibility for community . . . standards employed by the B.O.P. prior to December 2002 and without, consideration of 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20 . . .

MUNIZ, v. L. WINN, J. v. L., 462 F. Supp. 2d 175 (D. Mass. 2006)

. . . . §§ 570.20 and 570.21 that allow the BOP to circumvent these considerations. 2. . . .

COVIELLO, v. L. WINN,, 477 F. Supp. 2d 301 (D. Mass. 2006)

. . . . §§ 570.20, 570.21. . . . The rule was codified in 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20, 570.21: § 570.20 What is the purpose of this subpart? . . .

D. JASPERSON, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,, 460 F. Supp. 2d 76 (D.D.C. 2006)

. . . . §§ 570.20-.21. . . . categorical exercise of [its] discretion for designating inmates to community confinement.” 28 C.F.R. § 570.20 . . .

PEREZ, v. L. WINN, FMC, 457 F. Supp. 2d 109 (D. Mass. 2006)

. . . . §§ 570.20 and 570.21 wrongly preclude individualized consideration of a prisoner’s eligibility for . . . the standards employed by the B.O.P. prior to December 2002 and without consideration of 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20 . . .

HACKER, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, T. A. R. H. J., 450 F. Supp. 2d 705 (E.D. Mich. 2006)

. . . . § 570.20 and 28 C.F.R. § 570.21, the BOP no longer has the discretionary authority to place an offender . . . The petitioner challenges the validity and implementation of 28 C.F.R. § 570.20 and 28 C.F.R. § 570.21 . . . prisoner a reasonable opportunity to adjust to and prepare for re-entry into the community.” 28 C.F.R. § 570.20 . . .

UNITED STATES v. HERRINGTON,, 187 F. App'x 140 (3d Cir. 2006)

. . . . §§ 570.20, 570.21. . . .

LEVINE, v. APKER, 455 F.3d 71 (2d Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 570.20(a) (emphasis added). . . . that, because the BOP does employ CCCs “as part of pre-release custody and programming,” 28 C.F.R. § 570.20 . . . . § 570.20. . . . Categorical Rulemaking Authority The February 2005 Rule at issue in this case, published at 28 C.F.R. § 570.20 . . . inmates to community confinement only as part of pre-release custody and programming.... ” 28 C.F.R. § 570.20 . . .

PUTNAM, v. L. WINN,, 441 F. Supp. 2d 253 (D. Mass. 2006)

. . . . §§ 570.20, 570.21. § 570.20 What is the purpose of this subpart? . . . the standards employed at FMC Devens prior to December 2002 and without consideration of 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20 . . .

KU, v. WILLINGHAM, CT., 431 F. Supp. 2d 265 (D. Conn. 2006)

. . . . §§ 570.20-570.21, which restrict the prerelease time inmates can serve in a Community Correction Center . . . Community Corrections Centers (CCC) (also known as “halfway houses”) and home confinement. 28 C.F.R. § 570.20 . . . Remedy This Court having concluded that the 10% rule, 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20-570.21, is an invalid exercise . . .

MARTIN, v. WILLINGHAM, CT, 430 F. Supp. 2d 82 (D. Conn. 2006)

FULTS, v. SANDERS, FCI- FC,, 442 F.3d 1088 (8th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 570.20, 570.21. . . . . § 570.20-21. . . . George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. . 28 C.F.R. § 570.20 . . .

EVANS, v. WILLINGHAM,, 413 F. Supp. 2d 155 (D. Conn. 2006)

. . . . § 570.20-.21. . . . See 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20-21. . . . . § 570.20(a). . . .

WOODALL, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS G., 432 F.3d 235 (3d Cir. 2005)

. . . The final CCC designation regulations read as follows: § 570.20 What is the purpose of this subpart? . . . program (18 U.S.C. 3621(e)(2)(A)), or shock incarceration program (18 U.S.C. 4046(c)). 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20 . . .

MOSS, v. APKER,, 376 F. Supp. 2d 416 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . As codified, the policy provides: § 570.20 What is the purpose of this sub-part? . . . program (18 U.S.C. 3621(e)(2)(A), or shock incarceration program (18 U.S.C. 4046(c)). 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20 . . .

PIMENTEL, v. GONZALES,, 367 F. Supp. 2d 365 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . . § 570.20 What is the purpose of this subpart? . . .

UNITED STATES v. T. PAIGE,, 369 F. Supp. 2d 1257 (D. Mont. 2005)

. . . . § 570.20 provides: (a) This subpart provides the Bureau of Prisons’ (Bureau) categorical exercise of . . . 2005), one of the few cases which has examined the legality of the new BOP regulations, 28 C.F.R. §§§§ 570.20 . . .

COUNTY OF MONROE, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 678 F.2d 1124 (2d Cir. 1982)

. . . aid of all police officers or other persons in the execution of the warrant,” 11A N.Y.Crim.Proc.Law § 570.20 . . .

MARSHALL MINERALS, INC. v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION,, 661 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1981)

. . . . § 570.20 sets forth the following general principles for evaluating the safety of food additives: ( . . .

A. ROE S. v. UNITED STATES ROZZELL, v. UNITED STATES, 138 F. Supp. 567 (S.D. Tex. 1956)

. . . They reported this as ordinary income but later filed claims for refunds of $7,-570.20 and $11,497.85 . . .

RUTH v. STEARNS- ROGER MFG. CO., 13 F. Supp. 697 (D. Colo. 1935)

. . . tax for 1930 was arrived at by taking 12 per cent, of the net profit from infringing business, or $570.20 . . .