Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 520.07 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 520.07 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 520.07 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 520.07

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 520
RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALES
View Entire Chapter
520.07 Requirements and prohibitions as to retail installment contracts.
(1)(a) A retail installment contract shall be in writing, shall be signed by both the buyer and the seller, and shall be completed as to all essential provisions prior to the signing of the contract by the buyer.
(b) The printed portion of the contract, other than instructions for completion, shall be in at least 6-point type. The contract shall contain:
1. A specific statement that liability insurance coverage for bodily injury and property damage caused to others is not included, if that is the case; and
2. The following notice in substantially this form:

Notice to the Buyer

a. Do not sign this contract before you read it or if it contains any blank spaces.

b. You are entitled to an exact copy of the contract you sign. Keep it to protect your legal rights.

(c) The seller shall deliver to the buyer, or mail to the buyer at his or her address shown on the contract, a copy of the contract signed by the seller. Before the transaction is consummated, a copy of the retail installment contract, or a separate statement by which the disclosures required by this section are made and on which the buyer and seller are identified, shall be delivered to the buyer. Until the seller has delivered or mailed to the buyer a copy of the retail installment contract, a buyer who has not received delivery of the motor vehicle shall have the right to rescind the agreement and to receive a refund of all payments made and return of all goods traded in to the seller on account of or in contemplation of the contract or, if such goods cannot be returned, the value thereof. Any acknowledgment by the buyer of delivery of a copy of the contract, if contained in the contract, shall appear directly above or adjacent to the buyer’s signature.
(d) The contract shall contain the names of the seller and the buyer, the place of business of the seller, the residence or place of business of the buyer as specified by the buyer, and a description of the motor vehicle including its make, year model, and model and identification number or marks.
(2) The contract shall contain the following:
(a) Amount financed.The “amount financed,” using that term, and a brief description such as “the amount of credit provided to you or on your behalf.” The amount financed is calculated by:
1. Determining the cash price, and subtracting any down payment;
2. Adding any other amounts that are financed by the creditor and that are not part of the finance charge, including any additional amount financed in a retail installment contract to discharge a security interest, lien, or lease interest on a motor vehicle traded in in connection with the contract; and
3. Subtracting any prepaid finance charge.
(b) Finance charge.The “finance charge,” using that term, and a brief description such as “the dollar amount the credit will cost you.”
(c) Total of payments.The “total of payments,” using that term, and a descriptive explanation such as “the amount you will have paid when you have made all scheduled payments.”
(d) Total sale price.In a credit sale, the “total sale price,” using that term, and a descriptive explanation, including the amount of any down payment, such as “the total price of your purchase on credit, including your down payment of $ .” The total sale price is the sum of the cash price, the items described in subparagraph (a)2., and the finance charge disclosed under paragraph (b).
(e) Payment details.The number of scheduled payments, the amount of each payment, and the date of the first payment.

Except for the requirement in subsection (3) that a separate written itemization of the amount financed be provided, a contract which complies with the federal Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. ss. 1601 et seq., or any accompanying regulations shall be deemed to comply with the provisions of this subsection and subsection (3). However, in any proceeding to enforce the provisions of this section, the burden of alleging and proving compliance with the federal Truth in Lending Act shall be on the party claiming compliance.

(3) The seller shall provide a separate written itemization of the amount financed, which itemization shall disclose the following:
(a) The cash price;
(b) The amount of down payment;
(c) The difference between the amounts disclosed under paragraphs (a) and (b);
(d) The amounts, if any, included for insurance and other benefits, specifying the types of coverages and benefits; and
(e) Any taxes and official fees not included in the cash price.

The itemization required by this subsection may appear on a disclosure statement separate from all other material, or it may be placed on the same document with the contract or other information so long as it is clearly and conspicuously segregated from everything else on the document.

(4) The amount, if any, included for insurance which may be purchased by the holder of the retail installment contract may not exceed the applicable premiums chargeable in accordance with the rates filed with the Office of Insurance Regulation of the commission. If dual interest insurance on the motor vehicle is purchased by the holder, it shall, within 30 days after execution of the retail installment contract, send or cause to be sent to the buyer a policy or policies or certificate of insurance, written by an insurance company authorized to do business in this state, clearly setting forth the amount of the premium, the kind or kinds of insurance, the coverages, and all the terms, exceptions, limitations, restrictions, and conditions of the contract or contracts of insurance. Nothing in this act shall impair or abrogate the right of a buyer, as defined herein, to procure insurance from an agent and company of his or her own selection as provided by the insurance laws of this state; and nothing contained in this act shall modify, amend, alter, or repeal any of the insurance laws of the state, including any such laws enacted by the 1957 Legislature.
(5) If any insurance is canceled, or the premium adjusted, unearned insurance premium refunds received by the holder and any unearned finance charges thereon shall, at his or her option, be credited to the final maturing installments of the contract or paid to the buyer, except to the extent applied toward payment for similar insurance protecting the interests of the buyer and the holder, or either of them. The finance charge on the original transaction shall be separately computed:
(a) With the premium for the canceled or adjusted insurance included in the “amount financed”; and
(b) With the premium for the canceled insurance or the amount of the premium adjustment excluded from the “amount financed.”

The difference in the finance charge resulting from these computations shall be the portion of the finance charge attributable to the canceled or adjusted insurance, and the unearned portion thereof shall be determined by the use of the rule of 78ths. “Cancellation of insurance” occurs at such time as the seller or holder receives from the insurance carrier the proper refund of unearned insurance premiums.

(6) The holder may, if the contract or refinancing agreement so provides, collect a delinquency and collection charge on each installment in default for a period not less than 10 days in an amount not in excess of 5 percent of each installment. In addition to such delinquency and collection charge, the contract may provide for the payment of reasonable attorney’s fees when such contract is referred for collection to an attorney not a salaried employee of the holder of the contract, plus the court costs.
(7) No retail installment contract shall be signed by any party thereto when it contains blank spaces to be filled in after it has been signed, except that, if delivery of the motor vehicle is not made at the time of the execution of the contract, the identifying numbers or marks of the motor vehicle or similar information and the due date of the first installment may be inserted in the contract after its execution. The buyer’s written acknowledgment, conforming to the requirements of paragraph (1)(c), of delivery of a copy of a contract shall be presumptive proof of such delivery, that the contract when signed did not contain any blank spaces except as herein provided, and of compliance with this section in any action or proceeding by or against the holder of the contract.
(8)(a) Upon written request from the buyer, the holder of a retail installment contract shall give or forward to the buyer a written statement of the dates and amounts of payments and the total amount unpaid under such contract. A buyer shall be given a written receipt for any payment when made in cash.
(b) When a motor vehicle retail installment contract is paid in full, the holder shall ensure that the contract or title reflects that the lien has been satisfied or released and shall ensure that evidence of satisfaction is provided to the borrower or payor.
(9) The office may order a seller to refund any amounts assessed and charged on a retail installment contract which exceed the maximum charges provided by this act or by rules of the commission.
(10) A retail installment contract may provide that if a buyer rejects or revokes acceptance of the motor vehicle and asserts a security interest in the motor vehicle based on the ground of rightful rejection or justifiable revocation, the buyer must take one of the following actions:
(a) Post a bond in the amount of the disputed balance; or
(b) Deposit all accrued, and thereafter accruing, installment payments into the registry of a court of competent jurisdiction.

The cost of a bond posted under this subsection is awardable to the buyer in the proceedings. When the provisions of chapter 681 apply, this subsection shall not apply.

(11) In conjunction with entering into any new retail installment contract or contract for a loan, a motor vehicle retail installment seller as defined in s. 520.02, a sales finance company as defined in s. 520.02, or a retail lessor as defined in s. 521.003, and any assignee of such an entity, may offer, for a fee or otherwise, optional guaranteed asset protection products in accordance with this chapter. The motor vehicle retail installment seller, sales finance company, retail lessor, or assignee may not require the purchase of a guaranteed asset protection product as a condition for making the loan. In order to offer any guaranteed asset protection product, a motor vehicle retail installment seller, sales finance company, or retail lessor, and any assignee of such an entity, shall comply with the following:
(a) The cost of any guaranteed asset protection product, with respect to any loan covered by the guaranteed asset protection product, shall not exceed the amount of the indebtedness.
(b) Any contract or agreement pertaining to a guaranteed asset protection product shall be governed by this section.
(c) A guaranteed asset protection product is considered an obligation of any person that purchases or otherwise acquires the loan contract covering such product.
(d) An entity providing guaranteed asset protection products shall provide readily understandable disclosures that explain in detail eligibility requirements, conditions, refunds, and exclusions. The disclosures must provide that the purchase of the product is optional. The disclosures must be in plain language and of a typeface and size that are easy to read.
(e) An entity must provide a copy of the executed guaranteed asset protection product contract to the buyer. The entity bears the burden of proving the contract was provided to the buyer.
(f) An entity may not offer a contract for a guaranteed asset protection product that contains terms giving the entity the right to unilaterally modify the contract unless:
1. The modification is favorable to the buyer and is made without additional charge to the buyer; or
2. The buyer is notified of any proposed change and is provided a reasonable opportunity to cancel the contract without penalty before the change goes in effect.
(g) If a contract for a guaranteed asset protection product is terminated, the entity shall refund to the buyer all unearned portions of the purchase price of the contract unless the contract provides otherwise. A refund is not due to a consumer who receives a benefit under such product. In order to receive a refund, the buyer must notify the entity of the event terminating the contract and request a refund within 90 days after the occurrence of the event terminating the contract. An entity may offer a buyer a contract that does not provide for a refund only if the entity also offers that buyer a bona fide option to purchase a comparable contract that provides for a refund. An entity may not deduct more than $75 in administrative fees from a refund made under this subsection.
(h) Guaranteed asset protection products may be cancelable or noncancelable after a free-look period as defined in s. 520.152.
(i) If the termination of the guaranteed asset protection product occurs because of a default under the retail installment contract or contract for a loan, the repossession of the motor vehicle associated with the retail installment contract or contract for a loan, or any other termination of the retail installment contract or contract for a loan, the entity may pay any refund due directly to the holder or administrator and apply the refund as a reduction of the amount owed under the retail installment contract or contract for a loan, unless the buyer can show that the retail installment contract has been paid in full.
History.s. 6, ch. 57-799; s. 6, ch. 59-456; ss. 13, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 2, ch. 69-370; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-245; s. 1, ch. 77-457; s. 218, ch. 79-400; ss. 5, 21, ch. 80-256; s. 2, ch. 81-318; s. 2, ch. 83-123; s. 95, ch. 85-81; s. 1, ch. 85-207; ss. 4, 35, 36, ch. 90-103; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 2, ch. 95-234; s. 687, ch. 97-103; s. 8, ch. 99-164; s. 2, ch. 2000-127; s. 621, ch. 2003-261; s. 2, ch. 2008-75; s. 2, ch. 2024-142.

F.S. 520.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 520.07 on CourtListener

Amendments to 520.07


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 520.07

Total Results: 15  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Northside Motors of Florida, Inc. v. Brinkley, 282 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 1973).

Cited 37 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 13 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 23, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4944

...enacted in Florida (whether the Code has been enacted in the jurisdiction where the rights and remedies are asserted), including without limitation, the right to sell or otherwise dispose of the goods ..." Furthermore, as required by Florida Statute 520.07, F.S.A., the following language appeared in the contract in bold print: "NOTICE TO BUYER "(1) DO NOT SIGN THIS CONTRACT BEFORE YOU READ IT OR IF IT CONTAINS ANY BLANK SPACES....
Copy

Holt v. O'Brien Imports of Fort Myers, Inc., 862 So. 2d 87 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 22681423

...Holt filed an individual action, and he was also a named plaintiff in the class action brought with the Brollinis. The first three counts in both complaints alleged violations of the Motor Vehicle Retail Sales Finance Act (MVRSFA) in chapter 520, Florida Statutes (2000). Count one alleged that O'Brien Imports violated section 520.07(1) by failing to provide a copy of the retail installment sales contract with the essential provisions and financing disclosures before the Buyers signed for and accepted credit. Count two alleged that O'Brien Imports violated section 520.07(3)(d) by failing to itemize the amount it charged for certain insurance....
Copy

Cannon v. Metro Ford. Inc., 242 F. Supp. 2d 1322 (S.D. Fla. 2002).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25558, 2002 WL 31958926

...nto conformity with the basic federal pleading requirements. (2) Florida Motor Vehicle Retail Sales Finance Act ("FMVRSFA") Plaintiffs allege that Defendant violated the FMVRSFA in two ways: (1) by failing to sign the RISC, as required by FLA. STAT. § 520.07(1)(a); and (2) by failing to comply with the TILA, as required by FLA. STAT. § 520.07(2). Defendant argues that a 2001 amendment to the FMVRSFA prevents Plaintiffs from recovering for any violation of section 520.07, and that there is no violation of the TILA. The FMVRSFA requires that a retail installment contract must be in writing, signed by both the buyer and the seller, and be completed as to all essential provisions prior to the signing of the contract *1333 by the buyer. FLA. STAT. § 520.07(1)(a)....
...The statute's penalty provision allows a buyer to recover for any willful violation with respect to a retail installment contract. FLA. STAT. § 520.12(2). The statute was amended, effective June 8, 2001, to provide: Section 520.12(2) does not apply to any violation of the requirement in s. 520.07(1)(c) that the seller deliver or mail to the buyer a copy of the contract signed by the seller, if the seller delivered at the time the buyer signed the contract an exact copy of the contract that the buyer signed. FLA. STAT. § 520.12(3) (amended by Laws 2001, c.2001-196, § 32, eff. June 8, 2001). The Court finds nothing in this amendment to preclude the possibility of a buyer's relief for violation of section 520.07(1)(a), as alleged by Plaintiffs in the Complaint. Florida law provides that a contract that complies with the federal TILA shall be deemed to comply with the FMVRSFA, so long as it contains a separate written itemization of financing, as set forth in the statute. FLA. STAT. § 520.07(2). As explained above, the Court finds that Plaintiffs' TILA claims cannot be dismissed as a matter of law. Under Florida law, the burden of proving compliance with the TILA is on the party claiming compliance. FLA. STAT. § 520.07(2)....
Copy

Donoghue v. Wallach, 455 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...Thus, the county court concluded that the buyer was not required to pay the amount of taxes to seller. The seller then appealed to the circuit court. The circuit court agreed that by failing to separately itemize the sales taxes the seller had violated section 520.07, Florida Statutes (1981)....
Copy

Trotter v. Ford Motor Credit Corp., 868 So. 2d 593 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2573, 2004 WL 385004

...We disagree with the court's holding that no cause of action for common law restitution exists in Florida. But we agree that Trotter and Smith have failed to plead such a claim. Their cause of action for restitution is based solely on alleged violations of sections 520.07(2), 520.07(7), 520.12, 520.13, and 627.682, Florida Statutes (2000)....
...In fact, Trotter and Smith have sought these very remedies against Freedom in count III of their complaint, based on the same violations asserted against both Freedom and FMCC in count IV. While the Act does mention holders of retail installment paper, see § 520.07(6), it does not provide a remedy against a holder unless that holder has committed a willful violation....
Copy

Corcoran v. TranSouth Fin. Corp. (In Re Corcoran), 268 B.R. 882 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2001).

Cited 1 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 1, 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 1413, 2001 WL 1326912

...Any used motor vehicle not in Class 2 or Class 3 and designated by the manufacturer by a year model more than four years prior to the year in which the sale is made — $17 per $100 per year. (2) Such finance charge shall be computed on the amount financed as determined under § 520.07(2)....
...Simple-interest contracts A retail installment contract under The Motor Vehicle Retail Sales Finance Act may provide that the rate of finance charge be calculated on a simple-interest basis subject to the following provisions: (1) Instead of a finance charge computed on the amount financed as determined under s. 520.07(2), the seller may compute the finance charge at a simple-interest rate equivalent to the finance charge permitted by s. 520.08 on the unpaid balance as it changes from time to time or by any other method. . . . . . . . . (Emphasis supplied). 520.07....
...— The "finance charge," using that term and a brief description such as "the dollar amount the credit will cost you." Section 520.08(2) directs that the finance charge be computed on the amount financed, and the amount financed is to be determined as directed by § 520.07(2)....
Copy

Martinez v. Rick Case Cars, Inc., 278 F. Supp. 2d 1371 (S.D. Fla. 2003).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19825, 2003 WL 21995191

...Thus, whether the terms were disclosed or delivered to Martinez after the fact is irrelevant. Second, Martinez's Florida Motor Vehicle Retail Sales Finance Act claim survives, even if Rick Case delivered an exact copy of the contract Martinez signed. Florida Statutes § 520.07(1)(a) provides that: "[a] retail installment contract shall be in writing, shall be signed by both the buyer and the seller, and shall be completed as to all essential provisions prior to the signing of the contract by the buyer." Martinez...
Copy

State v. Mun. Auto Sales, Inc., 222 So. 2d 278 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5809

PEARSON, Judge. The state appeals from an order dismissing an information which charged Municipal Auto Sales, Inc., with grand larceny and with violating § 520.07, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., by obtaining the signatures of purchasers of an automobile on a retail installment contract which was not completed as to all essential provisions....
...d were acting for and in behalf of the corporate defendant; (2) all the defendants knew at the time of the presentment of the retail installment contract to the purchasers that the contract was not complete as to all essential provisions required by § 520.07, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. We reach the same conclusion regarding the second count that we did concerning the first count. We hold that, although it too was unartfully drawn, the second count charged Municipal Auto Sales with the crime of violating § 520.07, Fla.Stat., F.S.A....
Copy

Bengal Motor Co. v. Cuello, 121 So. 3d 57 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 1980147, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7810, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1088

...2d DCA 1997). But in this particular case, the RISC did not contain any of the language of contingency, nor did it reference the other two documents. See Hunter v. Bev Smith Ford, LLC, 2008 WL 1925265 , *1 at *5 (S.D.Fla. Apr.29, 2008), which states, Section 520.07 [FMVRSFA] does not expressly or implicitly prohibit financing contingencies....
Copy

Veal v. Crown Auto Dealerships, Inc., 236 F.R.D. 572 (M.D. Fla. 2006).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18237, 2006 WL 844561

...Crown violated Florida Statutes, section 520.12 by (1) failing to clearly and conspicuously make accurate disclosures in writing, in a form that the consumer may keep, prior to the consummation of the credit transaction pursuant to Florida Statutes, section 520.07(2)(a)-(e), as a result of including the cost of anti-theft etch insurance in the amount financed instead of the finance charge without providing the necessary TILA and Regulation Z disclosures; and (2) failing to identify and itemize the cost of TracGuard in accordance with Florida Statutes, section 520.07(3)(d)....
...Crown violated Florida Statutes, section 520.12 by (1) failing to clearly and conspicuously make accurate disclosures in writing, in a form that the consumer may keep, prior to the consummation of the credit transaction pursuant to Florida Statutes, section 520.07(2)(a)-(e), as a result of including the cost of anti-theft etch insurance in the amount financed instead of the finance charge without providing the necessary TILA and Regulation Z disclosures; and (2) failing to identify and itemize the cost of TracGuard in accordance with Florida Statutes, section 520.07(3)(d)....
Copy

Maroone Chevrolet, LLC d/b/a Maroone Chevrolet v. German Alvarado (Fla. 4th DCA 2022).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...501.201 pertaining to both trucks; 2) violation FDUTPA section 501.976 on the Second Truck; 3) violation of the Florida Motor Vehicle Retail Sales Finance Act section 520.08 on the First Truck and violation of section 520.07 on the Second Truck; and 4) fraud in the inducement. Maroone appeals the damages awarded on Counts 2, 3, and 4, but it does not appeal Count 1....
...payment and other payments on the First Truck. 2 Alvarado sued Maroone in late 2003, amending his complaint twice. The third amended complaint alleged four counts for violations of FDUTPA on both trucks, a violation of sections 520.08 and 520.07 on the First and Second Truck, respectively, and fraud in the inducement. The jury returned a verdict, finding Maroone: (1) did not violate section 501.201 on the First Truck but had violated section 501.976 on the Second Truck, awarding Alvarado $6,768.76; (2) willfully violated section 520.08 by charging above the finance charge limit on the First Truck, awarding Alvarado $1,858.85; (3) willfully violated section 520.07 by failing to provide an itemization of the finance charges on the Second Truck, awarding Alvarado $297.17; and (4) did not fraudulently induce Alvarado to purchase the First Truck but did fraudulent...
...See Urling, 468 So. 2d at 454. There simply was no competent, substantial evidence to support the proper measure of damages, and the jury’s ultimate damage awards pertaining to Count 2 must be reversed. 4 The Section 520.07 and Section 520.08 Claims As to Count 3, Alvarado claimed a violation of sections 520.07 and 520.08 based on the preparation of the RISC on the Second Truck and the preparation of the first RISC on the First Truck, respectively....
... Furthermore, applying the undisputed numbers for those values on the Second Truck to the proper formula produces a finance charge of 9.21%, which is also below the 11% statutory limit. Regarding the Second Truck, Alvarado claimed that Maroone violated section 520.07 by failing to disclose the $12,000.00 discount on the Second Truck on the second RISC when it reduced the cost of the truck by the original $12,000.00 down payment on the First Truck....
...Because Alvarado failed to introduce evidence of any diminution in the value of the Second Truck, we reverse the FDUTPA liability and damages awarded in Count 2 and remand for the court to vacate that award. Because Alvarado used the incorrect formula for the violation of sections 520.07 and 520.08 in Count 3, we also reverse the finding of liability and damages on that count....
Copy

AutoNation USA Corp. v. Miranda, 789 So. 2d 1188 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9800, 2001 WL 803196

AutoNation breached an obligation imposed by section 520.07(3) by failing to provide signed copies of the
Copy

Williams v. Delray Auto Mall, Inc., 916 F. Supp. 2d 1294 (S.D. Fla. 2013).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2013 WL 64616, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3505

...equired consumer disclosures. Defendants argue *1298 that Williams’ FMVRSFA claim fails for two reasons. First, Defendants claim that as long as the sales contract complied with TILA and contained an itemization of financing pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 520.07 (2), the contract did not violate the FMVRSFA....
...RSFA. The Court finds that Williams has properly plead a cause of action under the FMVRSFA. The FMVRSFA requires a retail contract to include: (1) the amount financed; (2) financial charge; (3) total of payments; and (4) total sale price. Fla. Stat. § 520.07 (2)(a)-(d)....
Copy

Nolden v. Summit Fin. Corp., 244 So. 3d 322 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...The title appears in bold capital letters on the first page. 2. The agreement itself complied with the statutory requirements imposed on Retail Installment Sales Contracts. The agreement includes the requisite "notice to buyer" section and a separate written itemization of the amount financed. § 520.07, Fla....
Copy

Adrianne Nolden v. Summit Fin. Corp. (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...The agreement itself complied with the statutory requirements imposed on Retail Installment Sales Contracts. The agreement includes the requisite “notice to buyer” section and a separate written itemization of the amount financed. § 520.07, Fla....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.