The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 201
EXCISE TAX ON DOCUMENTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 201.12

201.12 Duties of clerks of the circuit court.—Clerks of the circuit court shall report to the Department of Revenue the names and addresses of any and all individuals, firms, or corporations, who shall fail to have affixed either the required amount of stamps or a notation that the proper stamps and the amount of same have been paid or will be paid directly to the department on any conveyance or taxable instrument or document which may be recorded in their respective offices; and any such clerk who knowingly fails to report any such violation within 30 days after recording of any taxable instrument or document, without such stamps or notation, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction punished accordingly.

History.—s. 2, ch. 15787, 1931; CGL 1936 Supp. 1279(113), 7473(6); ss. 21, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 3, ch. 81-14; s. 11, ch. 96-395.

F.S. 201.12 on Google Scholar

F.S. 201.12 on Casetext

Amendments to 201.12

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 201.12

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S201.12 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - FAILURE TO REPORT FAILURE TO AFFIX EXCISE TAX - M: S

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

BANCOLITA, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 312 F. Supp. 3d 737 (N.D. Ill. 2018)

. . . Part 404, Subpart P, App. 2, Table No. 1, Rule 201.12. with 20 C.F.R. . . .

E. ANDERSON, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 711 F. App'x 796 (7th Cir. 2018)

. . . P, app. 2, Rule 201.12, 201.00. But we do not agree with Anderson that Dr. . . .

HURTER, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 712 F. App'x 691 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . P, app. 2, table 1, Rule 201.12. . . .

J. WILKERSON, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 278 F. Supp. 3d 956 (E.D. Mich. 2017)

. . . grids would mandate a finding that she is disabled. 20 C.F.R., Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2, §§ 201.12 . . .

ALSTON, v. DIRECTV, INC. DIRECTV, LLC,, 254 F. Supp. 3d 765 (D.S.C. 2017)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 201.12(3) (2d ed. 2011), “records of other courts generally may . . . to establish the fact of the litigation and actions- of that court,” 1 Weinstein & Berger, supra, § 201.12 . . . be judicially noticed for the truth of the matters stated in them.” 1 Weinstein & Berger, supra, § 201.12 . . . et al., Federal Rules of Evidence Manual § 201.02[3] (9th ed. 2006); 1 Weinstein & Berger, supra, § 201.12 . . .

M. BISCEGLIA, v. W. COLVIN,, 173 F. Supp. 3d 326 (E.D. Va. 2016)

. . . .-' P, App. 2, Rules 201.12, 201.14. . . .

SCHESKE, v. UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM,, 59 F. Supp. 3d 820 (E.D. Mich. 2014)

. . . University of Michigan Standard Practice Guide § 201.12: Discipline, http://spg.umich.edu/policy/201.12 . . .

BEARDSLEY, v. W. COLVIN,, 758 F.3d 834 (7th Cir. 2014)

. . . P, App. 2, § 201.12. Ms. . . .

PEARCE, v. FAURECIA EXHAUST SYSTEMS, INC., 529 F. App'x 454 (6th Cir. 2013)

. . . McLaughlin, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 201.12 (2d ed.1997). . . .

PEARCE, v. FAURECIA EXHAUST SYSTEMS, INC., 529 F. App'x 454 (6th Cir. 2013)

. . . McLaughlin, Weinstein’s Federal Evidenoe § 201.12 (2d ed.1997). . . .

EFFIE FILM, LLC, v. POMERANCE, a k a, 909 F. Supp. 2d 273 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . See Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, § 201.12[5] at 201^14 (“Courts may take judicial notice of historical . . .

BRYANT, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 451 F. App'x 838 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . ("VE”) as ones he could perform were unskilled sedentary jobs because Medical-Vocational Grid Rule 201.12 . . .

COLDIRON, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 391 F. App'x 435 (6th Cir. 2010)

. . . P, App. 2, rule 201.12 (2008). . . .

L. O NEAL, v. J. ASTRUE,, 391 F. App'x 614 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . P, Rule 201.12 & 201.14. This describes O’Neal as of her 50th birthday. . . .

JUSTICE, v. ASTRUE,, 589 F. Supp. 2d 110 (D. Mass. 2008)

. . . advanced age”; evaluated under this category, “one would expect him to be found disabled pursuant to Rule 201.12 . . .

TREVINO S. v. MERSCORP, INC. GMAC- RFC LLC d b a GMAC HSBC Co,, 583 F. Supp. 2d 521 (D. Del. 2008)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 201.12[3] (2d ed.2008). . . .

JUSTICE, v. ASTRUE,, 576 F. Supp. 2d 195 (D. Mass. 2008)

. . . given his work experience and education, one would expect him to be found disabled pursuant to Rule 201.12 . . .

R. LORRAINE v. MARKEL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,, 241 F.R.D. 534 (D. Md. 2007)

. . . Fed.R.Evid. 201(b); Weinstein at § 201.12[1]. . . .

GOGUEN GOGUEN, v. TEXTRON, INC., 234 F.R.D. 13 (D. Mass. 2006)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 201.12[3] at 201-38 to 201-39 (2d ed.2005). . . .

M. MASCH, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 406 F. Supp. 2d 1038 (E.D. Wis. 2005)

. . . P, App. 2, § 201.12. . . . is a high school graduate or has a more "limited education” she would be disabled under Grid Rules 201.12 . . .

GRAVEL, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 360 F. Supp. 2d 442 (N.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . Conversely, Rule 201.12 would direct a finding of “disabled” if Gravel only had the RFC for sedentary . . . Specifically, she relies on Rule 201.12, which directs a finding of "Disabled” where a claimant has the . . . P, App. 2, Table No. 1, Rule 201.12; see 20 C.F.R. § 416.963. . . . Gravel also contends that Grid Rule 201.12 should apply as of the date she filed her claim at age 49. . . .

AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION, v. NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION,, 347 F. Supp. 2d 1061 (D. Utah 2004)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 201.12[2] (2d ed.2004). . . .

A. SCHWABE, v. Jo BARNHART,, 338 F. Supp. 2d 941 (E.D. Wis. 2004)

. . . However, Grid rule 201.12 holds that the same person, if limited to sedentary work and lacking the education . . . P, App. 2 § 201.12. . . .

E. WIRTH, v. Jo BARNHART,, 325 F. Supp. 2d 911 (E.D. Wis. 2004)

. . . Assuming that all of the other findings made by the ALJ remained the same, she now fell under Grid Rule 201.12 . . .

KOTEC, Z. v. JAPANESE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW YORK,, 321 F. Supp. 2d 428 (D. Conn. 2004)

. . . Time Warner Inc., 937 F.2d 767, 773-74 (2d Cir.1991); see also 1 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 201.12 . . .

WIRTH, v. Jo BARNHART,, 318 F. Supp. 2d 726 (E.D. Wis. 2004)

. . . that all of the other findings made by the ALJ remain the same, she would now fall under Grid Rule 201.12 . . . Plaintiff is properly characterized under Rule 201.12 which necessitates a finding of disabled where . . . Therefore, the Court believes that plaintiff is entitled to a determination of disability under Rule 201.12 . . .

CASEY, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 76 F. App'x 908 (10th Cir. 2003)

. . . P, app. 2, § 201.12. . . .

S. HILL, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 250 F. Supp. 2d 1286 (D. Kan. 2003)

. . . no more than a limited range of sedentary work from and after January 1, 1996, the framework of Rule 201.12 . . .

GOTZ, v. Jo BARNHART,, 207 F. Supp. 2d 886 (E.D. Wis. 2002)

. . . in light of her age, education and sedentary work restrictions, Medical Vocational Rules 201.04 and 201.12 . . . Plaintiff alleges that Rules 201.04 and 201.12 direct a finding that she is disabled. . . . These rules contemplate an individual of advanced age (§ 201.04) or closely approaching advanced age (§ 201.12 . . . P, App. 2, §§ 201.04, 201.12. However, plaintiffs past work was “semi-skilled.” (Tr. at 74.) . . . evidence regarding transferable skills defeats an automatic award of benefits under Rules 201.04 and 201.12 . . .

S. MOSER, v. POLLIN, M., 294 F.3d 335 (2d Cir. 2002)

. . . Medina, New York Civil Practice § 201.12 (Mar.2002) (“Since the decision in In re Piccione, the trend . . .

L. CREASY, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 30 F. App'x 620 (7th Cir. 2002)

. . . Part 404, Subpart P, App. 2, Table No. 1, Rule 201.12. with 20 C.F.R. . . .

THOMAS, v. Jo BARNHART,, 278 F.3d 947 (9th Cir. 2002)

. . . P, app. 2, § 201.12. Ms. . . .

LINSCOMB, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 25 F. App'x 264 (6th Cir. 2001)

. . . does not support the ALJ’s decision to reject his claims as not credible; and 2) Listing of Impairment 201.12 . . . Linscomb’s RFC fell between sedentary and fight work, he does not meet the requirements of Listing 201.12 . . .

WERNER R. W. a F. Jr. L. L. R. A. Co. PA L. L. v. J. WERNER L. I. M. L. R. L. J. D. E. W. T. T. S. S. A. A. W. W. E. L. A. A. S. S. G. J. G. J. R. J. J. D. L. J. Co. PA a, 267 F.3d 288 (3d Cir. 2001)

. . . . § 201.12[l](2nd ed. 2001)(“While judicial notice based on general knowledge reflects the traditional . . .

SMITHERMAN, v. G. MASSANARI,, 149 F. Supp. 2d 1303 (M.D. Ala. 2001)

. . . claimant contends that the ALJ erred in failing to find her disabled under Medical Vocational Rules 201.12 . . .

M. IRBY, o b o M. v. A. HALTER,, 171 F. Supp. 2d 1287 (S.D. Ala. 2001)

. . . he was capable of performing light work; (3) he is disabled under Medical Vocational Guideline Rules 201.12 . . . Irby’s final claim is that he is disabled under Medical Vocational Guideline Rules 201.12 or 201.14. . . .

THOMAS, v. A. HALTER,, 131 F. Supp. 2d 942 (E.D. Mich. 2001)

. . . the vocational expert’s testimony as to Plaintiffs alleged disability; (5) “noted correctly that Grid 201.12 . . .

TM PATENTS, L. P. TM L. L. C. v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION,, 121 F. Supp. 2d 349 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)

. . . See MPEP § 201.12. . . .

P. IERADI, v. MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC. A. P. A., 230 F.3d 594 (3d Cir. 2000)

. . . Berger, Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 201.12 [8] (Joseph McLaughlin, ed., Matthew Bender 2d ed.1997) . . .

FLETCHER, v. PRICE CHOPPER FOODS OF TRUMANN, INC., 220 F.3d 871 (8th Cir. 2000)

. . . Model Food Code ¶ 2-201.12(A) (“The person in charge shall exclude a food employee from a food establishment . . .

R. RUSHING v. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY,, 185 F.3d 496 (5th Cir. 1999)

. . . . § 201.12 (standard for locomotive operation under moving conditions); id. § 201.13 (standard for rail . . .

M. STRAWHACKER, v. S. APFEL,, 17 F. Supp. 2d 880 (S.D. Iowa 1998)

. . . At any time that the ALJ finds that Plaintiff is limited to sedentary work, Rule 201.12 of the medical . . .

In J. HAWKINSON,, 222 B.R. 334 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1998)

. . . plans were ERISA qualified: a pension plan with 3M valued at $7,580; and, a 401(k) plan valued at $25,-201.12 . . .

HUGHES, v. S. CHATER,, 895 F. Supp. 985 (N.D. Ill. 1995)

. . . Section 416.969 of Regulations No. 16 and Rule 201.12, Table No. 1, Appendix 2, Subpart P, Regulations . . . P, App. 2, Table 1, Rule 201.12 (R. 20-21). . . . .

S. DELYRIA, v. E. SHALALA,, 856 F. Supp. 1432 (D. Or. 1994)

. . . Instead, the ALJ should have applied Rule 201.12, under the “sedentary work” Guideline, which would have . . . Under Rule 201.12, a claimant is deemed disabled if claimant (1) is closely approaching advanced age . . . The ALJ found that claimant satisfied these requirements which are the same under Rules 202.13 and 201.12 . . . disabled under Rule 202.13, while a person who can perform "sedentary work" is disabled under Rule 201.12 . . .

KUCHARCZYK v. W. SULLIVAN, M. D., 798 F. Supp. 283 (D. Md. 1992)

. . . basis upon which to find the claimant not disabled. (3) 20 C.F.R, Part 404, Page 407, Table No. 1, Rule 201.12 . . .

J. STATHIS, v. W. SULLIVAN, M. D., 964 F.2d 850 (8th Cir. 1992)

. . . P, App. 2, Rule 201.12 (1991). . . . Based on the AU’s fact findings, Stathis claims to meet all of the criteria of Rule 201.12. . . . We recognize that Rule 201.12 applies to claimants between ages fifty and fifty-four. . . . Therefore, on November 5, 1989, Stathis turned fifty and claims that she meets all of the criteria of Rule 201.12 . . .

PULLIAM, v. SULLIVAN, M. D., 769 F. Supp. 1471 (N.D. Ill. 1991)

. . . exertional capacity for light work, Pulliam’s age, education and work experience, Rules 201.11 and 201.12 . . .

COKER, v. Dr. W. SULLIVAN, U. S., 902 F.2d 84 (D.C. Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 201.12(a). . . . See id. §§ 201.10, 201.12. Heckler v. . . .

M. COOPER, v. M. SULLIVAN,, 880 F.2d 1152 (9th Cir. 1989)

. . . Cooper would be considered disabled if she were limited to sedentary work, § 201.00(g) and Rule 201.12 . . .

COKER, v. R. BOWEN, M. D., 715 F. Supp. 383 (D.D.C. 1989)

. . . Section 201.12 provides that HHS will conduct audits to determine whether states are properly spending . . .

H. DESROSIERS, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 846 F.2d 573 (9th Cir. 1988)

. . . Id. rule 201.12. . . .

E. POERTNER, v. R. BOWEN,, 651 F. Supp. 166 (E.D. Mo. 1986)

. . . the AU relied on § 404.1569 of Regulation 404 and § 416.969 of Regulation No. 16 in addition to Rule 201.12 . . .

MASTRONI, v. R. BOWEN, M. D. HHS,, 646 F. Supp. 1032 (D.D.C. 1986)

. . . See Rule 201.12, 20 C.F.R. Part 404, App. 2. . . .

BULPETT, v. HECKLER,, 617 F. Supp. 850 (D. Mass. 1985)

. . . Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2, § 201.12. . . .

LUNDQUIST, v. HECKLER,, 670 F. Supp. 781 (N.D. Ill. 1985)

. . . Lundquist is disabled under Rule 201.12. 20 C.F.R. Part 400, Subpart P, Appendix 2. . . .

In FARMERS RANCHERS LIVESTOCK AUCTION, INC. In DAVIS, DAVIS v. UNITED STATES FARMERS RANCHERS LIVESTOCK AUCTION, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 46 B.R. 781 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 1984)

. . . . § 201.12 Registrants whose registrations have been suspended or revoked. . . .

WALLACE, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 586 F. Supp. 395 (D.N.J. 1984)

. . . unskilled or that the skills are not transferable would result in findings of disabled under Rules 201.12 . . .

WALLACE, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 722 F.2d 1150 (3d Cir. 1983)

. . . See Rule 201.11 and 201.12, Table No. 1 of Appendix 2, Subpart P. . . . This runs directly counter to Reg. 201.12, Table No. 1 of Appendix 2, Subpart P. . . .

MAPLE LEAF FISH CO. v. UNITED STATES,, 566 F. Supp. 899 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1983)

. . . of prehearing briefs does not prohibit submission of prepared statements in accordance with section 201.12 . . . (d) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 C.F.R. 201.12(d)), it would be unnecessary . . .

Co. v., 5 Ct. Int'l Trade 275 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1983)

MORRISON- KNUDSEN CONSTRUCTION CO. v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,, 461 U.S. 624 (U.S. 1983)

. . . Law § 201.12 (McKinney 1965). . . .

M. AMBACH, v. T. H. BELL, M. AMBACH, v. T. H. BELL, Dr., 686 F.2d 974 (D.C. Cir. 1982)

. . . . § 201.12(b) (1981). . . .

PASCO TERMINALS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 634 F.2d 610 (C.C.P.A. 1980)

. . . Id. at 299, 53 S.Ct. at 352. . 19 CFR 201.12. . . .

v., 68 C.C.P.A. 8 (C.C.P.A. 1980)

. . . Id. at 299. 19 CFR 201.12. . . .

PASCO TERMINALS, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 477 F. Supp. 201 (Cust. Ct. 1979)

. . . See 19 C.F.R. 201.11, 201.12(b) (1972). . . . See 19 C.F.R. 201.12(c) (1972). . . .

v., 83 Cust. Ct. 65 (Cust. Ct. 1979)

. . . See 19 CFR 201.11, 201.12(b) (1972). . . . See 19 CFR 201.12(c) (1972). . . .

CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, a v. CITY OF DOVER, a, 450 F. Supp. 966 (D. Del. 1978)

. . . .-11, 201.12 and 201.13 (1976). . . . So far as the language of sections 201.11, 201.12 and 201.13 is concerned, the scope of the regulations . . . 1310 (1977), arguing that it supports its view that the noise standards specified in sections 201.11, 201.12 . . . stationary) and railway cars in marshalling yards was preempted by the federal regulation sections 201.11, 201.12 . . . Not only do sections 201.11, 201.12 and 201.13 apply to locomotives and rail cars but also to sound produced . . .

ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS, v. M. COSTLE,, 562 F.2d 1310 (D.C. Cir. 1977)

. . . . §§ 201.11, 201.12, 201.13. . 42 U.S.C. § 4916. . Id. . . . . Id. at § 201.12. . Id. at § 201.13. . . . .

HARRISON v. KEYSTONE COCA- COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, a, 428 F. Supp. 149 (M.D. Pa. 1977)

. . . Local Rule 201.12 adopts the Code of Professional Responsibility to govern the conduct of attorneys practicing . . .

RETAIL, WHOLESALE DEPARTMENT STORE UNION, LOCAL v. Dr. T. DUNLOP,, 405 F. Supp. 1306 (N.D. Ga. 1975)

. . . requirements for exception under tandem relationships (6 C.F.R. 201.11(a)(1), recodified at 6 C.F.R. 201.12 . . .

DOMINION LAND AND TITLE CORPORATION, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 320 So. 2d 815 (Fla. 1975)

. . . Appellant notes that pursuant to Section -201.12, Florida Statutes, the Clerk of the Circuit'Court is . . .

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA v. W. WEINBERGER,, 520 F.2d 344 (9th Cir. 1975)

. . . . § 201.12) and “deductions from subsequent grants made to the State agency” to compensate for “Expenditures . . . provided for under the related Act and State plan, including State laws and regulations. [45 C.F.R. § 201.12 . . .

NATIONAL NUTRITIONAL FOODS ASSOCIATION v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 504 F.2d 761 (2d Cir. 1974)

. . . . § 201.12 (codification of SEC Rule XII(a)), 201.11(e) (1973); 29 C.F.R. §§ 102.26, 102.41 (1972) ; . . .

KOSS v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF UNITED STATES,, 364 F. Supp. 1321 (S.D.N.Y. 1973)

. . . . § 201.12(c) (1973), specifies that an answer to a motion be made within five days. . . . .

FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. J. HARDY, a a, 222 F. Supp. 68 (E.D. Mo. 1963)

. . . contract of insurance under Title I of the National Housing Act, constitutes a violation of Section 201.12 . . . (d) of the administrative regulations promulgated under said Act (Title 24 CFR 201.12(d)), and, therefore . . . Section 201.12(d) of the administrative regulations, promulgated under said Act pursuant to Title 12 . . . transferee not holding a Contract of Insurance under Title I of the National Housing Act * * * 24 CFR 201.12 . . .

STATE PORT SEWALL REALTY COMPANY, a v. E. GREEN,, 91 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 1956)

. . . deed was due under Section 201.02, Florida Statutes 1953, and F.S.A., and by the provisions of Section 201.12 . . .

DOLCIN CORP. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 219 F.2d 742 (D.C. Cir. 1954)

. . . . § 201.12(d) (1949) ['Securities and Exchange Commission], . . .

UNITED STATES FIDELITY GUARANTY CO. v. HAGGART, 163 F. 801 (8th Cir. 1908)

. . . the comptroller of Deputy-Hurst’s account, and upon such revision it was shown that the shortage was $201.12 . . .