Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 92.55 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 92.55 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 92.55

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VII
EVIDENCE
Chapter 92
WITNESSES, RECORDS, AND DOCUMENTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 92.55
92.55 Special protections in proceedings involving victim or witness under 18, person with intellectual disability, or sexual offense victim.
(1) For purposes of this section, the term:
(a) “Sexual offense victim or witness” means a person who was under the age of 18 when he or she was the victim of or a witness to a sexual offense.
(b) “Sexual offense” means any offense specified in s. 775.21(4)(a)1. or s. 943.0435(1)(h)1.a.(I).
(2) Upon motion of any party, upon motion of a parent, guardian, attorney, guardian ad litem, or other advocate appointed by the court under s. 914.17 for a victim or witness under the age of 18, a person who has an intellectual disability, or a sexual offense victim or witness, or upon its own motion, the court may enter any order necessary to protect the victim or witness in any judicial proceeding or other official proceeding from severe emotional or mental harm due to the presence of the defendant if the victim or witness is required to testify in open court. Such orders must relate to the taking of testimony and include, but are not limited to:
(a) Interviewing or the taking of depositions as part of a civil or criminal proceeding.
(b) Examination and cross-examination for the purpose of qualifying as a witness or testifying in any proceeding.
(c) The use of testimony taken outside of the courtroom, including proceedings under ss. 92.53 and 92.54.
(3) In ruling upon the motion, the court shall consider:
(a) The age of the child, the nature of the offense or act, the relationship of the child to the parties in the case or to the defendant in a criminal action, the degree of emotional trauma that will result to the child as a consequence of the defendant’s presence, and any other fact that the court deems relevant;
(b) The age of the person who has an intellectual disability, the functional capacity of such person, the nature of the offenses or act, the relationship of the person to the parties in the case or to the defendant in a criminal action, the degree of emotional trauma that will result to the person as a consequence of the defendant’s presence, and any other fact that the court deems relevant; or
(c) The age of the sexual offense victim or witness when the sexual offense occurred, the relationship of the sexual offense victim or witness to the parties in the case or to the defendant in a criminal action, the degree of emotional trauma that will result to the sexual offense victim or witness as a consequence of the defendant’s presence, and any other fact that the court deems relevant.
(4) In addition to such other relief provided by law, the court may enter orders limiting the number of times that a child, a person who has an intellectual disability, or a sexual offense victim or witness may be interviewed, prohibiting depositions of the victim or witness, requiring the submission of questions before the examination of the victim or witness, setting the place and conditions for interviewing the victim or witness or for conducting any other proceeding, or permitting or prohibiting the attendance of any person at any proceeding. The court shall enter any order necessary to protect the rights of all parties, including the defendant in any criminal action.
(5) The court may set any other conditions it finds just and appropriate when taking the testimony of a victim or witness under the age of 18, a person who has an intellectual disability, or a sexual offense victim or witness, including the use of a therapy animal or facility dog, in any proceeding involving a sexual offense or child abuse, abandonment, or neglect.
(a) When deciding whether to permit a victim or witness under the age of 18, a person who has an intellectual disability, or a sexual offense victim or witness to testify with the assistance of a therapy animal or facility dog, the court shall consider the age of the child victim or witness, the age of the sexual offense victim or witness at the time the sexual offense occurred, the interests of the child victim or witness or sexual offense victim or witness, the rights of the parties to the litigation, and any other relevant factor that would facilitate the testimony by the victim or witness under the age of 18, person who has an intellectual disability, or sexual offense victim or witness.
(b) For purposes of this subsection the term:
1. “Facility dog” means a dog that has been trained, evaluated, and certified as a facility dog pursuant to industry standards and provides unobtrusive emotional support to children and adults in facility settings.
2. “Therapy animal” means an animal that has been trained, evaluated, and certified as a therapy animal pursuant to industry standards by an organization that certifies animals as appropriate to provide animal therapy.
(6)(a) In any criminal proceeding, before the defendant may take a discovery deposition of a victim of a sexual offense who is under the age of 16, the court must conduct a hearing to determine whether it is appropriate to take a deposition of the victim and, if so, whether to order any limitations or other specific conditions under which the victim’s deposition may be conducted.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c), in determining whether it is appropriate to take a deposition of a victim of a sexual offense who is under the age of 16, the court must consider:
1. The mental and physical age and maturity of the victim.
2. The nature and duration of the offense.
3. The relationship of the victim to the defendant.
4. The complexity of the issues involved.
5. Whether the evidence sought is reasonably available by other means, including whether the victim was the subject of a forensic interview related to the sexual offense.
6. Any other factors the court deems relevant to ensure the protection of the victim and the integrity of the judicial process.
(c) If the victim of a sexual offense is under the age of 12, there is a presumption that the taking of the victim’s deposition is not appropriate if:
1. The state has not filed a notice of intent to seek the death penalty; and
2. A forensic interview of the sexual offense victim is available to the defendant.
(d) If the court determines the taking of the victim’s deposition is appropriate, in addition to any other condition required by law, the court may order limitations or other specific conditions including, but not limited to:
1. Requiring the defendant to submit questions to the court before the victim’s deposition.
2. Setting the appropriate place and conditions under which the victim’s deposition may be conducted.
3. Permitting or prohibiting the attendance of any person at the victim’s deposition.
4. Limiting the duration of the victim’s deposition.
5. Any other condition the court finds just and appropriate.
(e) The court must enter a written order finding whether the taking of the deposition of the victim is appropriate. If the court finds that the taking of the deposition of the victim is appropriate, the order must include any limitations or other specific conditions under which the victim’s deposition must be conducted.
History.s. 7, ch. 85-53; s. 3, ch. 93-131; s. 23, ch. 94-154; s. 8, ch. 2000-336; s. 3, ch. 2011-220; s. 6, ch. 2013-162; s. 1, ch. 2014-4; s. 64, ch. 2016-24; s. 9, ch. 2016-104; s. 3, ch. 2016-199; s. 1, ch. 2017-13; s. 1, ch. 2023-148.

F.S. 92.55 on Google Scholar

F.S. 92.55 on Casetext

Amendments to 92.55


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 92.55
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 92.55.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In A. B. a T. B. v. R. B., 186 So. 3d 544 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . In that reasoning, the trial court explained for the first time that section 92.55, Florida Statutes . . . We recognize that pursuant to sections 92.53 and 92.55, the trial court was permitted to order on its . . .

In A. WISE D., 453 B.R. 220 (Bankr. D. Vt. 2011)

. . . Wise’s weekly paystubs showed a pre-tax benefit for medical insurance in the amount of $92.55 (Debtors . . .

MONTEIRO, v. MONTEIRO,, 55 So. 3d 686 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . In fact, section 92.55, Florida Statutes (2010), entitled “Judicial or other proceedings involving victim . . . capacity of the person with mental retardation, the nature of the offenses or act, the relationship See § 92.55 . . .

J. B. a v. STATE, 717 So. 2d 144 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . See § 92.55(2)(b)(4), Fla. Stat.; State v. Ford, 626 So.2d 1338 (Fla.1993). COBB, W. . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE, 649 So. 2d 1370 (Fla. 1995)

. . . section 960.001(l)(d), Florida Statutes (Supp.1992); (6) rule 8.245 (discovery), to conform to section 92.55 . . . Addition of this rule is mandated by section 92.55, Florida Statutes (1989). . . .

STATE v. FORD,, 626 So. 2d 1338 (Fla. 1993)

. . . On September 29, 1989, the prosecutor moved, pursuant to section 92.55, Florida Statutes (1987), that . . . The district court also held that section 92.55, Florida Statutes (1989), did not authorize the introduction . . . In addition, the district court held that even if section 92.55 authorized the videotaping of a child . . . Further, we recognize that section 92.55 was nonoperative because there was no enabling action or Court . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE, 608 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 1992)

. . . Addition of this rule is mandated by section 92.55, Florida Statutes (1989). RULE 8.120. . . .

HERNANDEZ, v. STATE, 597 So. 2d 408 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . In section 92.55, the legislature requested that the supreme court adopt procedures to protect child . . . The enactment of section 92.55 serves to support the trial court's decision. Gonzales v. . . .

WESCH, v. HUNT,, 785 F. Supp. 1491 (S.D. Ala. 1992)

. . . 100.00% 719 91.13% 67 8.49% 1 2 0.13% 0.25% 0 0.00% Total EASTERN VALLEY COMMUNITY 4,791 4,434 100.00% 92.55% . . .

FORD, v. STATE, 592 So. 2d 271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . On September 29, 1989, the prosecutor moved, pursuant to section 92.55, Florida Statutes (1987), that . . . As opposed to sections 92.53 and 92.54, where the legislature acted, section 92.55 is a nonoperative . . .

DISINGER, v. STATE, 569 So. 2d 824 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . of closed circuit television to obtain testimony of a victim or witness under sixteen, and section 92.55 . . .

STATE v. DIAMOND,, 553 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Section 92.55 — Judicial or other proceedings involving child victim or witness under the age of 16; . . .

In TERRY,, 78 B.R. 171 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1987)

. . . Service Station 57.71 Anesthesiologists 64.30 Animal Hospital 67.00 AT & T 89.59 Cleveland Hospital 92.55 . . .

In W. ASBRIDGE, 61 B.R. 97 (Bankr. D.N.D. 1986)

. . . The aggregate of these two claims comprise 92.55% of the total secured debt. . . .

BRIAN JACKSON ASSOCIATES, INC. S. v. SAN MANUEL COPPER CORPORATION, a a, 305 F. Supp. 66 (D. Ariz. 1969)

. . . publications such as books, magazine articles, patent copies, etc., introduced as exhibits herein: 92.55 . . .

GRACE SHOOK, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF FRED SHOOK, DECEASED, v. THE UNITED STATES, 61 Ct. Cl. 816 (Ct. Cl. 1926)

. . . Shook, petitioner) insurance premium, April-May-June, at 64 cents_ 1. 92 - 92.55 Balance_ 92. 93 The . . .

RICHARDS v. SECURITY MUT. LIFE INS. CO., 259 F. 727 (N.D.N.Y. 1919)

. . . state of New York, and demands: (1) That defendant be enjoined from collecting any sum in excess of $92.55 . . . premiums-to be paid by plaintiff; (5) that defendant be enjoined from refusing to accept the sum of $92.55 . . . required to account to plaintiff for all sums heretofore collected by it from the plaintiff in excess of $92.55 . . . increased amount, the amount demanded each year, since 1911, being higher or greater than said sum of $92.55 . . . Secondly, it is claimed that the contract of insurance, providing for the payment of $92.55 as yearly . . .