The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 80
QUO WARRANTO

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 80.02

80.02 Quo warranto; control of Attorney General over certain proceedings.—When the Attorney General commences an action setting forth the name of the person rightfully entitled, or when petition is filed upon the relation of a party claiming title, the Attorney General shall not dismiss the action without the consent of the claimant, but the court shall investigate the claim and determine the right, if so desired by the person on whose relation the petition is filed, and the claimant may have counsel of his or her choice to control the action in the claimant’s behalf.

History.—s. 4, ch. 1874, 1872; RS 1784; GS 2261; RGS 3584; CGL 5449; s. 30, ch. 67-254; s. 420, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 80.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 80.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 80.02

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 80.02

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 80.02.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES v. HELM,, 410 F. App'x 767 (5th Cir. 2011)

. . . obtained the charging instruments for Helm’s prior convictions, which showed under which subsections § 80.02 . . .

CROPLIFE AMERICA, INC. d b a s LLC LLC v. CITY OF MADISON, N., 373 F. Supp. 2d 905 (W.D. Wis. 2005)

. . . 2) l_ CHAPTER 80 ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR LAWN FERTILIZER APPLICATION AND SALE 80.01 Authority. 80.02 . . . Stats 80.02 PURPOSE AND INTENT. . . .

LEWIS, v. S. APFEL,, 236 F.3d 503 (9th Cir. 2001)

. . . earned an average of $289.66 per month; in 1991, it was $168.30 per month; in 1992, $188.92; in 1993, $80.02 . . .

ARIZONANS FOR FAIR REPRESENTATION, v. J. SYMINGTON,, 828 F. Supp. 684 (D. Ariz. 1992)

. . . 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Hispanic 13.15% 50.46% 11.80% 7.77% 16.51% 12.98% NH White 80.02% . . .

LOUDERBACK v. UNITED STATES, 500 F. Supp. 575 (D. Colo. 1980)

. . . In 1973 assembling and marketing costs were 80.02 per cent of the established retail prices and the tax . . .

ZENITH RADIO CORPORATION, v. MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD. NATIONAL UNION ELECTRIC CORPORATION, v. MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD. In JAPANESE ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 505 F. Supp. 1190 (E.D. Pa. 1980)

. . . . ¶ 80.02 at 80-7 (rule should now be read in conjunction with Official Court Reporter Act of 1944). . . .

SAN ANTONIO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v. RODRIGUEZ, 411 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1973)

. . . By contrast, during the same school year only 80.02% of the teachers had college degrees in the property . . .

COFFEE, v. PERMIAN CORPORATION, 474 F.2d 1040 (5th Cir. 1973)

. . . The Knight shares were then cancelled and Permian’s ownership in Knight Company increased to 80.02%. . . .

WRIGHT, v. WALLING,, 159 F. Supp. 190 (W.D. Ark. 1958)

. . . plaintiffs being allowed to amend their petition to show a cause of action for damages not to exceed $80.02 . . .

GOLTZMAN v. ROUGEOT, 122 F. Supp. 700 (W.D. La. 1954)

. . . Regulation 80.02 declares that a steam vessel “shall include any vessel propelled by machinery * * * . . .

THREEDY v. BRENNAN, 40 F. Supp. 69 (E.D. Wis. 1941)

. . . freeholders may apply to the town board of the town for that purpose in the manner provided in section 80.02 . . .

MONTROSE CEMETERY CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 105 F.2d 238 (7th Cir. 1939)

. . . In 1902 Kircher purchased an 80.02 acre tract of land in the northwest part of the city of Chicago for . . .

v., 27 B.T.A. 607 (B.T.A. 1933)

. . . In her return petitioner claimed a credit of $80.02. . . .

Co. v. Co. v. v., 9 B.T.A. 468 (B.T.A. 1927)

. . . The remaining 80.02% was owned by the Norfolk Railway & Light Co. . . . carry out this proposal the lease specifically provided that among the- assets to be leased was the 80.02% . . . . is the closely affiliated interest through which the Virginia Kail way & Power Co. controlled the 80.02% . . .

J. L. LANCASTER AND CHARLES L. WALLACE, RECEIVERS OF THE TEXAS PACIFIC RAILWAY, v. THE UNITED STATES, 60 Ct. Cl. 80 (Ct. Cl. 1924)

. . . Plaintiffs billed the single fare at $80.02 and 33 fares at. $29.72 to Chattanooga, the rates due under . . .